For his ‘historic’ meeting with Donald Trump, Vladimir Putin stated his intention of laying all the cards out on the table and addressing the root causes of the ongoing crisis in Ukraine, which, unless addressed, won’t resolve tensions between Russia and the West. In other words, a ceasefire, or ‘Minsk III’, would be just another fool’s errand given that the terms of I and II were reneged by Ukraine(with the encouragement of the West that used them as ploys against Russia). Putin supposedly explicated the events within a larger context, and it entailed the Western’s hostile attitude and strategy toward Russia. It all sounded reasonable enough(and sufficiently firm), but it didn’t go far enough, and why?
Because if Putin is really serious about getting to the core of the issue, he would acknowledge the fact that the Ukraine War has essentially been a Judeo-Russian War. The ‘leadership’ of the West, as currently configured, consists mainly of puppets and pawns whose overlying purpose is to appease the Empire of Judea. Even the US, the so-called Lone Superpower, is run by Jewish hegemonists(whose main identification is with the Empire of Judea) and their hapless goy cucks. The US military is to the Jews what the Sikhs were to the British who once ruled India.
Furthermore, if Putin really means business looking forward, he would have to spell out what is clear as day: The US isn’t some neutral player or impartial observer in this conflict but has been the primary enabler of the Kiev regime and its virulent anti-Russian policies. And even though Donald Trump may be something of an outlier in seeking working relations with Russia, the fact remains that his first term worsened matters by arming Ukraine for a war of aggression(while civilians in Donbass came under constant shelling) and tearing up long-existing missile treaties with Russia.
Some may argue that Trump was hampered by the Russian Collusion Hoax — the Deep State derailing his diplomatic gestures to Russia, at least half the country seeing him as “Putin’s Puppet”, and even the GOP doing the bidding of anti-Russian Jewish Neocon elements in sabotaging any rapprochement with Russia — , and as such, his options were limited to handing US-Russian policies over to establishment figures close to the military-industrial complex, New-Cold-Warriors, and the ‘Russophobes’. Focused on surviving the Russian-Collusion-Hoax scandal, Trump hadn’t much of a leeway in resetting relations with the Kremlin. But, such an explanation is too generous to Trump who, as events concerning Iran have shown, is a two-faced weasel and a lowlife punk with the mentality of a gangster.
If Putin is willing to indulge the charade that there never would have been a Ukraine War if Trump had retained the presidency in 2020, he can forget about getting to the root(s) of the problem because, all said and done, Trump has been and will always be just another arm of Jewish Supremacist power.
The recent turn of events, however uncertain, has little to do with what Trump wants. It’s the result of his Jewish puppet-masters having sensed that things are getting desperate and hopeless in Ukraine, therefore they may lose everything; and so, they’re simultaneously using Trump as a ‘man of peace’ to butter up Putin(so as to salvage as much as they can in Ukraine) and using their European puppets to hammer away at a more aggressive policy against Russia. In other words, Jews use their EU puppets to keep growling at Russia while using Trump to convince Putin that ‘peace’ is possible, therefore Russia should come to the table for a negotiated settlement where most of Ukraine remains under the control of the Jewish oligarchs who run Kiev.
The US spent a lot of money on the war, but it hasn’t sacrificed manpower. In contrast, it’s widely assumed that Russia has lost up to 130,000 men, which is more than twice the number the US lost in Vietnam over eight years. If we add up all the wounded and mentally damaged soldiers, it could reach up to a million. The main culprit that enabled this horror has been the US controlled by Jewish supremacists who covet Russia as their rightful whorehouse. And Trump, for all his verbiage about making nice with Russia in the 2016 campaign, has mostly been a hapless tool of the very Jewish Supremacists who derailed his wishful conciliatory policy.
The idea of Putin in good faith coming to any agreement with the US government would be a betrayal of what Russia has gone through. The US did everything to cripple and destroy the Russian economy. The US used its media power to spread the most deranged anti-Russian propaganda all across the West(and its satellites). The US-controlled West stole over $350 billion of its assets and may used the interests to fund and arm Ukraine.
The key countries that have remained supportive of Russia during the conflict have been China and Iran(and India in trade). Trump outed his true nature in relation to Iran, gloating about Israel’s surprise attack and dastardly murder of politicians and military commanders, an act that makes Pearl Harbor look like a pageant of honor. We know the entire Jewish-controlled West defended Israel’s attack as a ‘right to defend itself’ even though it was Iran that was attacked(in the middle of negotiations no less). And if we consider that Israel has hundreds of nukes aimed at Iran while Iran never possessed nuclear weapons, the scenario gets crazier. We know where Trump stood in the middle of this fiasco. (He also had General Soleimani murdered earlier.) Vileness knows no bounds with Trump who, one minute, cheered on Israel’s shock attack on Iran, and then the next minute, hogged credit as an ‘impartial’ peacemaker between Israel and Iran, supposedly ancient foes who can’t stop hating one another.
Now, it’s no secret that the reason as to why the Trump faction wants to make nice(r) with Putin is to drive a wedge between Russia and China, if only to ramp up the next big cold war(and maybe a hot war) with the latter.
Given that Iran and China have stood alongside Russia through the entire West’s war on Russia in Ukraine, it would be foolish for Putin to ease ties with Trump’s US that yet seeks more confrontations around the world, not least in Venezuela against which the current US administration is cooking up fantastic accusations, not least because of that country’s good relations with Iran and sympathy for the Palestinians.
Even if Trump is personally well-intentioned in regards to Russia, it doesn’t matter because he’ll be gone in three years. The real power in the US and the West will be in the hands of Jewish Supremacists whose long-term anti-Russian strategy will remain intact.
There’s a sense that Putin(and some around him) are still impressed with the US as the Lone Superpower, the premier country of prestige and respect. They seem stuck in the post-Cold War mentality when the Soviet Union collapsed overnight while the US stood tall as the reigning undisputed giant. But such a mentality is unwarranted.
True, the US is still immensely powerful and prosperous and has made leaps and bounds in key technologies. Also, mass immigration has made the US far more populous since the end of the Cold War.
However, the US has also become a silly country where most goyim are hapless and gutless cuck-dogs of Jewish Power now bereft of wisdom and driven by gangsterism and power-lust. The US needs to be feared but is undeserving of respect, especially when its idea of neo-spirituality is the worship of the homosexual bunghole painted in ‘rainbow’ colors.
The problem isn’t with Putin and/or Russian officials meeting with Trump & his team or the pragmatic realization that the US and Russia, as major world powers, must have some kind of working relations. The problem lies with the delusion that Russia can, in good faith, come to any terms with the US on the basis of long-term trust and respect.
Consider. When Richard Nixon met with Mao Zedong, both sides knew they were light years apart in ideology and national interests; however a dialogue was deemed necessary between two such important powers.
In world affairs, all sides must keep open channels for dialogue, even with rivals and enemies. But one should never drop the ball on the nature of the other side, especially if hostile. The North Korean regime understood this, meeting with US officials but never trusting them. In contrast, Gaddafi trusted the West and ended up with a dagger up his arse. Assad of Syria hoped for better relations with the West, even aiding in the US invasion of Iraq and the ‘rendition’ of terrorist suspects. In the end, however, the Zionist-run West used the ‘Arab Spring’ to foment a ‘civil war’ in Syria, which was turned into rubble(and is now headed by an Al-Qaeda thug suddenly showered with praise by the US and EU as usual in deference to Zion). The reformist Chinese government believed in US good intentions in the Eighties but was nearly toppled by mass protests that were in no small part engineered by the CIA. After the fall of communism, Russians looked to Western advisors to transform the economy but found their country pillaged and looted by Jewish oligarchs.
Arguably, the West might have pursued a different policy had it not fallen into the hands of Zionist-Supremacists. The US, after all, did implement the generous and far-sighted Marshall Plan that went a long way to rebuild Europe. And Japan made great gains under the US umbrella as well.
To be sure, Europe and Japan in the aftermath of World War II were down and out, essentially defeated, declining, or secondary powers that looked to the US as the top dog in the emerging Cold War and post-imperialist world order. The US could be somewhat magnanimous with countries within its neo-imperial sphere.
But when it came to sovereign nations or countries with potential for great power status(to rival the US empire), the policy has often been different. Usually, the position has been hostile, like against Cuba following the Revolution. Or, it’s been a kind of a hustle, offering carrots to lure them closer only to strike with a stick. Or, it’s been to develop them into junior partners, rich and strong but ultimately secondary and subservient to the US, somewhat like the French Empire vis-a-vis the mightier British Empire.
Anyway, if we were in the first year of the Ukraine War, a time when Russian casualties hadn’t yet climbed to current levels, when terrorist attacks in Russia proper hadn’t yet occurred, when Kursk hadn’t yet been invaded, and when Russian nuclear air fleet hadn’t yet been bombarded by drones(infiltrated into Russia), negotiations with the US(and the West) might make sense.
But at this late date, if the Kremlin thinks a permanent resolution to the conflict is possible through dialogue instead of through total victory on the battlefield all on Russia’s terms, it’s a den of fools and cowards.
The real rulers of the US want Russia to be ultimately defeated and dismembered, if not this year then in ten years, if not in ten years then in fifty years, if not in fifty years then in a hundred years. And it will remain so AS LONG AS Jewish Supremacists rule the West.
No amount of Trumpian salesman tactics can negate this truth, which means any deal with his administration can only be temporary and palliative. It’d be like treating the symptoms of the disease without diagnosing it. The Jewish Supremacists running the West see Ukraine as another Syria, a country that once seemed saved and stable(by the interventions of Russia, Iran, and Hezbollah in Lebanon) but was ultimately undermined and destroyed by the Empire.
The problem runs deeper because the kind of people whispering into Putin’s ears for a deal with the US are really Trojan Horse fifth columnists. Too many Russian elites have the Polish Disease, a kind of Slavic self-loathing that seeks validation by way of approval from the ‘superior’ West and the all-powerful and ‘cool’ America.
Will such types ever learn? They say men’s IQ drops by around 30 points in the presence of a gorgeous woman. It seems the IQ of leaders around the world undergo a similar decline when dealing with the Lone Superpower. For all their trepidations about the untrustworthy US, they are flattered when given an audience. It’s as if the US and the West in general are the only game in town. You haven’t made it unless you’ve made it over there. Hand some Iranian director or actor an award at some International Film Festival(invariably in Europe), and he or she is ready to piss on his/her own country to win more plaudits from ‘sophisticated’ Westerners who are deemed so superior to the rubes back home.
This blind-spot seems to affect Putin as well. Something of a Germanophile for much of his life, he trusted the likes of Angela Merkel and others in the hope of Russia being accepted as a respected partner by the West. Indeed, against all warning signs over two decades, it took the Ukraine Conflict for him to finally wake up, but then he wasn’t alone. Many Russians realized the full extent of West’s hostility toward them only when the US and EU waged total war on Russia, not only on its government but on its economy, culture, and history.
Despite all the troubles heaped on Russia as the result of America’s militarization of Ukraine, Putin in Alaska seemed to go along with the charade that the problem isn’t really the US but certain recalcitrant elements in the EU. For all the talk of getting at the ‘roots of the problem’, there’s the usual lack of candor. Putin won’t say that it was the Jews all along: Jews run the US and hate the idea that lowly Slavs have possession of so much land and resources.
If the Putin the Slav is willing to let Jews off the hook, he only proves the Jewish point, i.e. Slavs are a bunch of slavish dogs. It should be obvious by now that, more than Ukraine(which has been a puppet all along) and the EU(a collection of vassal states), it’s been the US that has been at the center of Russia’s woes. For Putin to play along with the Trumpian masquerade(of the US’s neutrality in the affair) after the US has done so much to cause harm to his country is downright embarrassing(and disgusting).
Imagine a reverse-scenario in which Russia had used Mexico or the Southwest territories of the US in a similar manner. Suppose Russia sent tons of arms there to groups hostile to the US, usurped the local governments, encouraged armed groups to shell US civilians(of whom over 10,000 perished), and provoked a war that killed over 100,000 US soldiers. Suppose Russia even sought to destroy the US dollar and crash the entire economy.
Would any US leader pretend that Russia is some neutral third party in the bloodbath? If the Russian president offered to ‘mediate’ between Mexico or breakaway Southwestern ‘republics’ and the US, would the American leader agree to a meeting with the Russian leader and be taken on a limousine ride? Of course not. And American people wouldn’t stand for it.
But Putin thus disgraced Russia. He went with the outrageous BS that the US hasn’t been the biggest enabler of Ukraine in this conflict, implying that the real blame lies with the bad faith actors of the EU.
A cold-eyed view of Trump’s actions leads to only one conclusion. Trump is trying to save some chestnuts for his Jewish masters from the fire lest Russia finish the job, take as much land as possible, and vanquish any possibility for the West to use Ukraine as a future proxy.
Some argue that dismantling the Ukrainian military(as bludgeon of NATO) than gaining territory has been the main strategy of the Russian war plan, but while it makes sense on the battlefield, winning the peace will be determined by territorial gain. All said and done, the whole point of weakening the enemy is so that, when the moment finally arrives, it can no longer hold the territories from which power could be exerted. Unless the territory is taken, it can be used once again as a base from which to launch future campaigns.
Besides, most of Ukraine is arguably a part of historical Russia and, as such, it wouldn’t be like Russians taking alien lands with zero historical or cultural justification. The only proper way to treat Ukrainians is as prodigal Russians who must be taught a lesson not to side with the West against Mother Russia. Ukraine itself must be taken to the woodshed and given a thorough whupping. While war is a great evil that should be avoided whenever possible, the fact remains that too many Ukrainians were lulled by the Siren Song of the Jewish-controlled West and caught the Polish Disease of self-loathing Slavicism and doglike craving from approval of the New World Order. Further, too many interests in the West were invested in luring Russia into a conflict, which was to serve as justification for collapsing the Russian economy. Thus, peace was no longer an option for a Russia with pride, self-respect, and of course the will to survive.
Unfortunately, Russia has done a poor job of inspiring loyalty and trust among its Ukrainian neighbors and striking fear in the hearts of its potential rivals and enemies along its periphery. This is rather pathetic given that Russians and Ukrainians have so much in common. Apart from the population in Donbass who primarily identify as Russians, Russia Proper has done little to win over the hearts and minds of the Ukrainians as a ‘brotherly people’.
This suggests a deficiency of vision and imagination among the Russians. If the US from afar can win over so many European nations, with which it has little in common, how is it that Russia has managed only to stir up contempt, loathing, and disgust among its neighboring countries, even Slavic ones?
Contrast Russia’s failings in this regard with the relative successes of other powers. Bismarck’s Prussia unified the German peoples through ‘blood and iron’, but at the end of the day, the various Germanic populations under Prussian dominance felt proud to be part of the newly molded nation. And later under Hitler, most Austrians were ecstatic to join the Third Reich.
Why can’t Russia inspire similar feelings among the Ukrainians? Even the lowlife Erdogan of Turkey has been more successful in stirring up pan-Turkic passions through all of Central Asia than Putin has been with Slavic peoples outside Russia. Consider another example. Following the bloody American Civil War, the bitter and resentful White Southerners accepted as fait accompli that they were part of the great United States of America and loyally served in its military. In contrast, what has Russia inspired among most Ukrainians? Even most Slavic and/or Christian Orthodox nations(with historic and/or cultural ties to Russia) prefer the paternalistic(or maternalistic) company of the West than maintain brotherly ties with Russia. Take Greece and Bulgaria.
What total failure of the imagination, especially in contrast to what Jews have achieved with non-Jews. Jewish globalists even managed to win over the ‘Ukro-Nazis’ to their side. They managed to convince 70% of Ukrainians to elect a Jewish comedian to be their leader. Even though Jews are only 2% of the population in the US that’s historically been predominantly Christian, they ‘converted’ the great majority of Americans to venerate Jews, support Israel, worship the Holocaust, revere Anne Frank, serve AIPAC, obey the ADL, and etc., as well as worship GloboHomo, a Jewish-concocted pseudo-religion. It sounds unreal, but Jews managed to do all that. Jews persuaded the majority of whites in the US and EU to see Russia as the Eternal Enemy regardless of ideology, i.e. it doesn’t matter if communism is long dead, Russia is worse than ever!
In contrast, Russians cannot even convince nearby Ukrainians(or Armenians for that matter), who are ethnic, historical, and cultural cousins of the Russians, to join with Russia in the spirit of mutual respect & support and peace & prosperity.
Adolf Hitler was a bad guy, no doubt, but at least give him credit where it’s due: He had vision and imagination to inspire the various Germanic peoples to band together. He even won over Mussolini and the Italian Fascists who initially regarded the National Socialists with disdain and contempt. In contrast, Putin’s Russia has won zero respect among its neighbors to its east and south. Even neighboring or nearby countries with tiny populations like Finland, Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, and Armenia sneer at Russia, snub their noses at Putin, and throw in their lot with the EU and NATO controlled by faraway US.
Partly, it’s the historical fear of Russia that renders its neighbors irrational in their ‘Russophobia’, which drives them into the arms of NATO. But it’s doubtful that anyone really believes that a resurgent and revanchist Russia is eager to gobble up its neighbors. No, the likelier reasons are twofold: Putin’s cautious approach is seen as weak, and no one respects a wimp, especially if it’s a big wimp. To the world, the US is a big tough guy whereas Russia is a big wimp. The US is seen as all muscles, whereas Russia is seen as all blubber.
The other reason is Russia’s lack of cultural and/or ideological cachet, ironically even more following the fall of communism. As terrible as communism turned out to be, it was like a secular substitute for Christianity for many in the West, and even social-democracies in the Capitalist West traced their origins to Marxism. Thus, the idea that Russia, once the most backward part of Europe, made the giant leap to take on the vanguard role as the dominant revolutionary force in Europe(and the entire world, inspiring anti-imperialist movements) held a certain fascination for many in the West.
Communism, though ultimately the god that failed, really put Russia on the map ideologically in the 20th century, not least because of the idealization of the Bolshevik socialist experiment when the West was in the throes of the Great Depression, the epic prestige of the Russian victory over Nazi Germany, and the perception of Soviet support of national liberation struggles following World War II.
Russia once held a cultural attraction as well, albeit for reasons opposite the ideological. If radicals and leftists once looked to the Soviet Union as the hope for mankind, the model of the construction of the New Man, conservatives and reactionaries found in their dream of Russia something close to the ‘Medievalist’ ideal, a society and culture close to the earth, profoundly religious, organically hierarchical, indeed one where men were men, women were women, and children were children. This appeal didn’t necessarily fade with the onset of the Soviet experiment and, if anything, took on a tragic glow, as the forces of conservatism, once regarded as repressive, carried the cross as victims of reckless radicalism that destroyed millions of lives and uprooted Russian society from timeless themes of history and spirituality.
In contrast, post-Soviet Russia has been in something of a limbo. It no longer holds the title as the premier revolutionary force in the world, but it is also sufficiently post-modern to negate any deep connection to tradition, heritage, and the past, though there have been campaigns by the Russian government to restore the Orthodox Church and certain cultural traditions. Ironically enough, the main tradition that current Russia alludes to most is the Soviet sacrifice and victory in World War II, a time when the communist government was compelled to invoke nationalist and even spiritualist themes to unite the vast domain against the German aggressors.
At any rate, current Russia is too ‘rightist’ & ‘reactionary’ to appeal to Western ‘Liberals’ & ‘Progressives’ and too soulless & hedonistic to appeal to Western rightists; as for the Western ‘conservatives’, they are little more than servile toadies of Zion, which means that if Jews hate Russia, most ‘conservatives’ feel obliged to follow suit given their utter lack of agency.
The only way Russia can inspire is via the fascist model, but even if one argues that its current system is quasi-fascist, it can only be implicitly so given that fascism is forever associated with Nazi Germany and its evils. Thus, even though Putin’s achievements owe most to something resembling fascism, his government and the cultural/intellectual leaders of Russia are loath to present their approach in an open and honest way. It can only be submarine fascism or stealth bomber fascism than battleship fascism.
Russia owes its current power to fascist-like policies but proclaims to be at war with ‘neo-fascist’ forces in Ukraine. The actual difference between the so-called ‘Ukro-Nazis’ and current Russia can be summarized as toady-supremacist fascism(of Ukrainian self-loathing Slavic Nazis who suck up to supremacist Jews) versus the national-humanist fascism of Russia, the ideology of which is somewhat close to the earlier manifestations of Italian Fascism(before its fatal alliance with the racial supremacist National Socialism of Adolf Hitler).
But instead of formulating its set of ideas into an inspirational creed, Russia usually falls back on the old Western Liberal talking points of ‘fighting Nazis’, even though, ironically enough, the Jews are the main backers of the ‘Ukro-Nazis’ and have used their media power to convince the majority of Westerners that Putin is the New Hitler. Aleksandr Dugin is regarded in some circles as a kind of guru of New Russian Thought, but there simply isn’t enough there to captivate the attention of the world, especially its intellectuals, artists, and would-be-leaders.
Therefore, despite its vast size and military prowess, Russia plays a rather diminished, even passive, role in the world. Unlike Jews who have the power to persuade the entire West to wave the ‘gay’ flag and worship sodomy, Russia hasn’t even been able to win the respect of its nearest neighbors that prefer to join the EU club, celebrate ‘rainbow’ sodomy, and do the bidding of faraway America. Because post-Soviet Russia is passive and deferential(to the West), it’s seen as weak and wussy. The real reason why even tiny nations like Estonia and Lithuania bark at Russia owes less to fear or negative historical memory. It’s because they see the US(and NATO) as the strong horse and see Russia as the weak one.
There’s a difference between caution and timidity, and Putin’s actions over the years have seemed more timid than cautious. If Russia cannot win over its neighbors with ideology or culture, it has to win their respect by a show of force and confidence, thereby striking fear in their hearts.
However, the protracted war in Ukraine, though ultimately favorable to Russia, has given the Jewish-run Western Media ample opportunity to spin the narrative that Russians cannot even secure the eastern parts of Ukraine after three bloody years. If Eastern European nations(that were either neutral or in the Soviet camp during the Cold War) truly fear today’s Russia, they wouldn’t be cheering on the war against Russia or have joined NATO(as Sweden and Finland did).
In a way, Russia is like White America(or White Europe), seen as big and wussy. Whites are still the majority in the US(and the overwhelming majority in most of Western Europe), but they’ve been neutered of identity, heritage, pride, confidence, and courage. Thus, whites are always deferring to Jews, blacks, homosexuals, Diversity, immigrants-migrants-refugees, and etc. So, even though whites are still demographic majorities, hold the most wealth, and occupy many elite positions, they’re morally defensive, as if any sign of their well-being, status, and privilege is an affront to an ‘inclusive’ and ‘diverse’ multi-cultural future that idolizes Jews, blacks, and homos above all.
Indeed, the current moral basis of the West’s right of hegemony is its rejection of nationalism, ‘racism’, ‘homophobia’, ‘antisemitism’, and ‘far-rightism’ in the name of ‘diversity’, ‘inclusion’, abolishment of ‘whiteness'(as a disease). So, even though the US is still the Lone Superpower, it doesn’t represent the America of old that was essentially White and Christian but the New America as conceived by Jewish Supremacists who suppress white identity to render it obedient to Jewish Power. Western prestige today has little or nothing to do with whiteness as a matter of autonomous entity and worth but with whiteness as a burden and obligation of whites around the world to prioritize the idolization of Jews, homos, and blacks. Not only is the history of white imperialism regarded as evil but even the modest desire of whites to live in their own lands and mind their own business; that too is regarded as ‘racist’ and ‘far right’ because it neglects the White Duty to serve the Jews, blacks, and homos(and some Diversity), a secular equivalent of people living for themselves than for the glory of God in a religious community.
Thus, the White West has become like a giant wimp, which is more embarrassing that a tiny wimp. If a mouse acts like a mouse, that’s only natural. But if an elephant acts like a mouse, that’s laughable. The new conception of the West holds that the US and EU, along with Canada and Australia, are all about IDEAS, mainly that of ‘inclusion’, ‘diversity’, and etc. In this way, it doesn’t matter if the West is hegemonic or constitutes an empire, because it’s the empire of ‘diversity’, ‘equity’, and ‘inclusion’ where all of humanity are welcome to take part. In a way, part of the reason for the West’s war on Russia is due to the latter being too white, the kind that isn’t burdened with historical guilt that could be exploited by Jews. Granted, a monkey wrench has been thrown into this equation because the Western establishment also insists on unconditional support for Jewish Supremacism, Zionist imperialism, and gangster-nihilism for Israel, as if Jews themselves are exempt from the values they’ve imposed on the goyim, especially whites.
Now, how has Russia been like the White West? Even though Russian whites are different from Western whites(who’ve been thoroughly indoctrinated by pseudo-liberal Zionist Jews), post-communist Russia has been excessively deferential to the West, indeed as if Russia lacks autonomous civilizational without the approval and validation by the more advanced, prosperous, and rules-based West. In other words, Russia must strive to earn the respect of the West, but never vice versa. Such attitudes became ingrained in Russian ‘cosmopolitan’ elites and are far from absent among the current ruling elites, even despite three bloody years of conflict in Ukraine with the degenerate West. Some say the war has emboldened many Russians to finally develop a sense of pride and heritage independent of Western opinion, but only time will tell if it will take root and lead to a cultural rebirth. But, even if Russia is now emboldened to name the EU as a hostile and useless partner, can it name the US as the power behind the EU and, to go even further, to name Global Zion as the power behind the US?
Boris Johnson
How depressing that the world finds it easier to slaughter millions of people than speak a simple truth. Russia has demonstrated its capacity to shoot off countless missiles and artillery shells to kill untold numbers of Ukrainian soldiers(and some Western advisors) but also its incapacity to speak the simplest truth about this war, that the Jews have been behind it. It’s rather like the observation that the average person is more afraid of public speaking than of dying. Russia is more afraid of naming the Jewish Power than killing a million Ukrainians.
When questioned by Tucker Carlson to explain the origins of the war, Putin went on and on for about 45 minutes on the history between Russia and Ukraine, but he failed to name the instigator, the bad faith mixer of Jewish Supremacism. Current History is usually not about Deep History but prevailing power politics. For instance, China and Taiwan share a long history together, but given that the ruling elites of Taiwan are cuck-collaborators of the US Empire, tensions remain high. During the Sino-Japan War just prior to World War II, it wouldn’t have made much sense for Chiang Kai-Shek to speak of all the cultural and historical ties between China and Japan going back many centuries. For all that deep history between the two civilizations, what really mattered at the moment was Japan was an aspiring imperialist power that sought dominance in Asia in its competition with the Western empires. The case of South Korea and North Korea is even starker. They were part of a single domain for as long as anyone could remember in terms of Deep History but remain divided because of ongoing legacies of the political structures implemented by the US and the USSR upon Japan’s surrender.
Likewise, even though Putin is correct about the Deep History between Russia and Ukraine, current Ukraine operates on the basis of power dynamics of whoever is in charge, and they happen to be Ukrainian cuck-collaborators of the Jewish supremacists who rule the West. Thus, Putin’s history lesson to Carlson was really irrelevant to the issue at hand, i.e. Ukraine came under the thumb of the Empire of Judea, not least because Russia played the game timidly with the West that came to regard Russians as a bunch of cowards. Unless Putin and Russians are willing to name the Jewish Power, they will never get to the root of the problem.
Because Putin and his supporters would rather blame the Nazis(old and new), the British, the EU, and NATO, there’s this impression among Russians that the current conflict owes to the ‘Russian thing’, meaning that Europeans have held a deeply entrenched hatred and contempt for Russians as lesser humans or subhumans, a people who are either culturally or even genetically prone to be slave-like, which supposedly explains the history of the Tsars, Stalinism, Soviet repression, and ‘Putler’-ism.
Some Russians even go so far as to argue that crypto-Nazism is still alive and well in Europe, i.e. deep in their hearts, the majority of Europeans during and since World War II hoped for a German victory and never forgave Russia for its defeat of Hitler’s pan-European empire. Yet others, Russians and non-Russians, argue that the current conflict is essentially an Anglo-thing, baked into the cake of both the British and American worldview; supposedly, the current British hostility toward Russia is merely the latest manifestation of the British Empire’s rivalry with the Russian Empire since the 19th Century.
But, such explanations are misguided or misconceived. Just think. If indeed the EU is really crypto-Nazi, why is it so ecstatically supportive of ideas, policies, and themes disdained and despised by the Nazis? Hitler had no love for the Jews, but Jews are like the god-like brahmin caste in the eyes of the Europeans. If Nazism were still alive, even as an undercurrent, there would be ‘antisemitism’ simmering in every corner of Europe, but it’s otherwise. Jew-Worship is the order of the day.
Also, Nazis persecuted homosexuals, and yet, Anno Sodomini is the quasi-official cult of the West, from the US to Canada to the UK to the EU. The Nazis weren’t known for their idolatry of non-white races, such as blacks. Yet, the current West is all about the idolization of blackness. Negrolatry is run amok everywhere, and whites in the US and EU look upon blacks as sacred cows or demigods. The Nazis certainly wouldn’t have endorsed the Great Replacement of White Europeans with Third World masses. Their favored idea of the Great Replacement was the Lebensraum plan in Russia; it was certainly not having Continental Europe be overrun by millions of immigrants from Africa, Middle East, Asia, and even Latin America, one of the notable sources of (reverse)immigration to Spain.
Given these facts, the current European animus toward Russia has nothing to do with lingering strains of Nazism. Nor with British Imperialism, as the current Anglo Civilization is about inviting the world to take over Britain, not about Britain taking over the world.
The European mind is no longer grounded in history, heritage, ethnicity, culture, or patriotism. It’s been hollowed out by Pop Culture, Americanism, and the guilt-cult surrounding World War II, especially in relation to World War II. Having expunged any deep sense of roots and pride, Europeans have outsourced their sense of morality to the supposed holy tribe consecrated by the Holocaust(as the culmination of white/European/Christian evil).
Thus, the current European mind is essentially canine in its orientation. Doglike, it merely obeys the Jews as to what to like, what to hate, whom to cheer, whom to cheer or jeer, and etc. As with dogs, there’s no internal consistency. A dog growling at a stranger will make nice if so ordered by the master.
Indeed, consider the utter lack of European consistency when it comes to Arabs/Muslims. For all their professed commitment to mass immigration and diversity, Europeans either support or tolerate the Jewish-run American Empire’s destruction of the Middle East. They hardly express any sympathy for the mostly Arab and/or Muslim victims of these wars. Yet, they welcome the ‘refugees’ of these wars as a moral imperative. In other words, Arabs might as well be subhumans when they’re dying OVER THERE, but they’re suddenly precious OVER HERE as ‘refugees’ or migrants. The very EU elites who pledge support for Arab/Muslim refugees/migrants will in the same breath insist that Israel has all the right in the world to massacre as many women and children as it wants to in Gaza, Syria, and Lebanon.
The very EU elites who condemn Russia’s ‘aggression’ in Ukraine will say Israel has the ‘right to defend itself’ whenever it initiates attacks on Iran, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, and other countries. The very Europeans, who claimed to have learned the mother of all moral lessons from the Holocaust, turn a cold eye to the genocide happening in Gaza. Of course, not all Europeans are like this, but the EU elites and enough Europeans are exactly so, utterly lacking in agency and always saying and doing whatever that is most pleasing to their Jewish masters.
Within this context, the anti-Russian feelings about Europeans aren’t rooted in anything substantive. The current antipathy is merely what the Jews ordered, and most Europeans mindlessly comply. The reasons for the distrust and disgust in regards to Russia are direct or indirect. In the most direct sense, the Jewish-run news media(and entertainment complex) run endless narratives about Russian backwardness, repressiveness, corruption, militarism, aggression, and evil plans to reconstitute the old empire and conquer whole swaths of Europe. Hollywood movies and TV shows invariably feature Russians as thugs, sociopaths, crooks, thieves, gang-bosses, or drunkards. (This is why Russian people shouldn’t place much hope on the distinction between the American elites and the American people, as most Americans have absorbed many hours of TV where Russianness is almost synonymous with villainy, which is exactly what the Jews ordered as their global empire needs to maintain distrust between American goyim and Russian goyim.) Many people in the West have been led to see Russians as a direct threat, a real danger, a mortal enemy.
But even for Westerners who don’t believe in resurgent Russian militarism or the fantastic idea that Putin plans to reconstitute the Soviet Empire, there are indirect reasons for their dislike. The West that emerged especially after the Sixties was one of deracination and rejection(and even revilement) of its roots and tradition. Western identity went from one of ancestry and history to one of unfettered individualism, hedonism, personal liberation-ism, and ideological fashions, of which ‘woke-ism’ is merely the latest version. Thus, there’s little of depth, continuity, or sense of permanence left in the West.
Because Russia(as well as some parts of Eastern Europe), during and after communism, albeit with the exception of the wild transitional period of the 1990s, retained a sense of nationality, continuity, and tradition, it is disdained as pigheaded and stupid, stubbornly resistant to necessary progress or Fukuyama’s End of History, such as filling up entire national sports teams with blacks and with endless fanfare in celebrations of GloboHomo.
Having converted the entire West to Anno Sodomini, Jewish Power could vilify Russia as the recalcitrant hold-out against the worship of the ‘rainbow’ homo anus. Silly as it sounds, it’s conceivable that the top reason for the ‘progressive’ community’s hostility toward Russia has to do with the suppression of the brazen antics of homo-narcissists and NGO-funded groups like Pussy Riot. In years past when Europeans had a real identity and a real culture, it would have been unimaginable that so many Europeans and Americans could hate Russia on account of its refusal to allow Gay Rites parades on the Red Square, but the deracinated, rootless, infantile, and mindless fools who now populate the West can be steered to like or hate anything at the drop of a hat.
All said and done, anything less than Russian taking virtually everything east of the Dnieper River, along with Odessa, can be construed as a defeat for Russia. While destroying the Ukrainian military(as NATO proxy) than taking territory may be a sound combat strategy, long-term security will depend on who controls which territory. As long as Ukraine as NATO proxy holds onto most of Ukrainian territory, it can always rebuild a fighting force or position Western forces against Russia. Only the possession of all the territories east of the Dnieper River and the city of Odessa(to secure Russia’s control of the northern Black Sea area) can provide an effective buffer against future provocations from the Empire of Judea.
Of course, naming this Jewish Supremacism will be even more effective and definitive as a long-term strategy, but alas, Russia is a country that has the iron stomach to slaughter a million ‘brotherly’ Slavs in battle but has the feet of clay when it comes to saying three little words: “Jews done it.” It’s all so pathetic, especially as World Jewry tirelessly spews the most rabid and virulent anti-Russian propaganda 24/7. In a way, the Russian ‘courage’ to kill so many Ukrainians is the flipside of the cowardice to simply state the obvious: The Ukraine War is a Judeo-Russian War.
And even though Israel and Ukraine are two sides of the same Jewish Supremacist coin — and even though Israelis have gone out of their way to sabotage Russian interests in Central Asia and the Middle East — , Russia perpetuates the delusion of being on good terms with Israel(and looking forward to constructive relations with the Jewish-run US).
There are Israel and World Jewry doing everything to destroy Iran and use Azerbaijan against both Iran and Russia, and even though Russia is backing the defense and survival of Iran, it also maintains the charade that Israel is some kind of working partner(and that Russian-Jews in Israel give a damn about Russia, which they don’t).
Russia has shown the world it can shoot off countless missiles and drones, but it has yet to prove that it can drop the Truth Bombs. We know why the US, UK, EU, and the rest of the gang cannot. Totally under the thumb of Jewish Supremacist rule, the elites there are a bunch of cuck-collaborator dogs who dare not utter the truth. Also, Jews shower those goy elites with lots of prizes for their craven perfidy.
In contrast, there are no carrots for Russia from the Empire of Judea, only sticks. And whenever Russia rolls out the red carpet for World Jewry, the latter urinate and defecate on it.
Animals can fight with unmatched ferocity. Russia can certainly fight like a wounded bear, no easy foe to overcome. However, what distinguishes humans from animals is the power of language. Russia has bloodied Ukraine with its fangs and claws, but it has yet to use its lips to point the blame at the Empire of Judea. That will have a bigger impact than any bomb, even an atomic one. And only thus can Russia get to the root of the problem.
As for the EU, what a sorry bunch of saps. They bet the house on the defeat of Russia and the promise of leftovers after the Jewish Supremacists had their fill. But if Russia wins and remains standing(and even grows in stature in the eyes of the world), the US will have no choice but to deal with Russia as an important player in world affairs, in which case the EU vassals will be demoted from favored shills to an annoying bunch of losers.
After all, for all the tough talk against China, the US respects it, not Taiwan(or even Japan or South Korea or Philippines). If the US embarks on an aggressive strategy against China, its satellite East Asian nations will likely follow suit and bark at China. But once the US realizes that China cannot be beaten or diminished, it will have no choice but to treat it with respect… in which case all the East Asian vassals that yapped at China will be left looking ridiculous(and irrelevant).
The EU could very well end up being ‘taiwanized’ from the whole affair. Though reliable ‘allies’ of the US against Russia, if the US decides Russia is ultimately undefeatable, it will shake Russia’s hand while slapping away the EU sidekicks. Remember that the US under Richard Nixon agreed to recognize Red China and have it take over the seat at the UN at the expense of Taiwan.
If a heavyweight boxer is out to beat another heavyweight boxer and has a bunch of gimps cheering him on, he may appreciate the gimps upon knocking out the opponent. But if his opponent is tough and goes the distance, our boxer is more likely to respect him as an equal than waste attention on the gimps, however supportive they may be.
This is why Russia’s victory must be a commanding one. Only then will the US deem Russia as a power deserving of respect, like it or not, whereas the EU shills will be relegated to the aisle reserved for ridicule.
