Homomania or Queertianity = Satanic Jewish christianity

How Jewish Oligarchs & Commissars of Google observe Easter

How Jewish Oligarchs & Commissars of Google celebrate Homomania or Queertianity

Sometimes, what had been a great triumph for a people can turn into a matter of great shame and tragedy. When white Americans used black Africans as slaves, it was a great boon to the economy. White Americans even took pride in the act of civilizing black African savages into a people governed by law & order in a complex and advancing civilization. White people told themselves, "Those Negroes would be acting wild & crazy and dancing with gorillas IF we didn’t put them to good use as slaves in our superior order." So, white subjugation of blacks seemed like a good thing at the time. But once the Narrative changed and condemned the evil, greedy, and ‘racist’ whites for having enslaved and exploited an innately noble and superior-souled(and-bodied) people, white treatment of blacks in the past became a matter of great shame for white Americans, especially those in the South. Proud triumph turned into shameful tragedy for the white race.
Likewise, Nazi Germans were full of triumphant pride when they conquered and lorded over much of Europe. It was deemed as evidence of ‘Aryan’ superiority and awesomeness. It seemed as though the next 1000 yrs would be the ARYAN MILLENNIUM. The Germans seemed unstoppable. But then, the Soviets began to roll back Nazi gains, and eventually, the entire Nazi Empire came tumbling down. Then, everything the Nazis had done was deemed ugly, shameful, and evil. The change in reality and narrative turned Triumph into Tragedy, Pride & Prowess into Shame & Guilt.
This could also be said of Communism. There was a time when many people sincerely and passionately believed in Marxism-Leninism. They saw it as the wave of the future. They were so certain of its goodness and rightness that they believed ANY MEANS NECESSARY were justifiable to spread communism. Terror, mass imprisonment, state slavery, and mass killings were all fair game because History was on the side of Scientific Materialism of Marxism-Leninism. Communism would surely triumph and justify everything that’s been done in its name because its victory was as assured as the Sun rising in the East and setting in the West. But as communism became increasingly discredited and then finally collapsed, every triumph that had been associated with it came to be seen in a tragic light. In the Stalinist Era, it seemed as though all of Stalin’s deeds and accomplishments were awesome, superb, and morally justified. But in retrospect, Stalinism came to be associated with fear, paranoia, terror, ruthless repression, and mass killings. The once proud Red symbol of Communism came to stand for bloodbaths and rabid lunacy.
And consider the Narrative of Jews and Jesus. Jews worked with Romans to have Jesus killed and His Disciples harassed and persecuted. And when Jesus died on the Cross, Jews saw it as victory and triumph. They got rid of a heretic Jew with the blessing and support of Romans. Just like Jews today pressure goy elites to do the bidding of Jews, Jews back then pushed Romans to kill a renegade Jew. Of course, Jews today have supreme elite power whereas Jews back then were subjects of the Roman Empire. But it goes to show how even Jews-without-power have the Will-to-Pushiness that can make a great empire do their bidding. Anyway, Jews were satisfied and relieved that the dangerous Jew Jesus was killed and gotten rid of. They thought they won. But then, there arose the Narrative of Jesus as the Son of God who returned from the dead and gained entry into Heaven. As this Faith spread, what had been a triumph for Jews turned into tragedy. Jews came to be collectively blamed for the killing, indeed the murder, of the Son of God. (Jews say it was most unfair for ALL JEWS FOR ALL TIME to be blamed for the killing of Jesus, the blame for which btw has been shifted more to Romans after WWII, BUT Jews have no qualms about blaming ALL GERMANS AND ALL CHRISTIANS FOR ALL TIME for Shoah. It goes to show Jews are such hypocrites. They want to milk German Guilt and White Goy Complicity forever and ever and ever... just like the Overlook Hotel in THE SHINING wants to own the soul of Jack Torrance forever and ever and ever.) Anyway, the main point is that what had once been deemed triumphant/proud can later be regarded as tragic/shameful, and vice versa. It all depends on who controls the Narrative. Thus, any triumph/pride is vulnerable to reinterpretation that renders it as a case of tragedy/shame. (The British who used to be so proud of their Great Empire are now made to apologize for its abuses and exploitations 24/7, even tearing down symbols of past British pride in their own nation.) Likewise, what had once been deemed tragic or shameful can be re-jiggered to seem triumphant and proud. It’s like what Moses says of his staff to Ramses in the TEN COMMANDMENTS: "You gave me this staff to rule over scorpions and serpents, but God made it a rod to rule over kings." Ramses gave the stick to Moses as a beggar’s tool, but Moses wields it like the rod of God. Later, when Moses goes to receive the Commandments of God, the restless perverts among the Jews decide to go Ron-Jeremy-and-Sarah-Silverman and erect an idol of the Golden Calf to worship and celebrate. They are full of pride and riding high. But then, Moses returns and, with the power of the Lord, destroys the pride of pagan idolatry. What is ‘cool’ is made ‘fool’.

Because the Power of Narrative can turn black into white, white into black, black into white again, and white into black again, one must be careful and mindful of what he selects, blesses, and promotes with his use of Narrative. One must be sure to associate pride with what is deserving of pride. One must be sure to associate justice with what is just. One must associate beauty with what is possessed of beauty. After all, if the pride of beauty has been associated with something ugly, then it is only a matter of time before someone calls out on the discrepancy in the manner of the boy in "Emperor’s New Clothes".
But then, the power of Narrative is such that even the Worthy can be ‘discredited’ and condemned as Unworthy. Even Truth can be demeaned as False. Even real Beauty can be demeaned as Ugly. Even Tyranny can be sold as Justice. Of course, it’s more difficult to push the Bad as the Good, but the Power of Narrative and Social Conventions is such that Enough People can be fooled into believing that black-is-white. After all, how was it that all those Hindus thought it was a good idea to stick a piece of metal through their noses? And how was it that all those Chinese thought it was a good idea to ‘bind’ women’s feet? How was it that all those women in the Victorian Era thought it was a good idea to tightly strap corsets around their waists? (One thing for sure, women can be more easily goaded into doing totally stupid shit.)

We don’t need to look far to see how the Bad can easily be promoted as the Good in the Current Year. Just look at Homomania or Queertianity. It is now associated with ‘rainbow’ colors. Yes, homos(who indulge in gross fecal penetration) and trannies(who mutilate their puds and poons) get to hog all the colors of the rainbow. A symbol that had once been associated with the profound moral tale of Noah’s Ark and with the realm of the great Germanic gods is now the symbol of ‘pride’(more like poo-ride if you ask me) of Homos and Trannies. Also, what had once been called ‘gay pride’ is now just called Pride. Joining 'gay' and 'pride' is ridiculous enough as what is so pride-worthy about penises inside the anuses of men? And if trannies are so proud, whey do they go to the trouble of radically altering their hormones and bodies to be what they are not? But apparently, 'gay pride' wasn't good enough for homos. They want 'pride' to automatically mean 'gay'.
Just like homos appropriated the term ‘gay’ for themselves — ‘gay’ used to mean being light, happy, or debonair and didn’t apply ONLY to homos — , they decided to appropriate ‘pride’ for the LGBTQP — P is or Pervert-Pedophile — community or cum-unity. Talk about arrogance and megalomania. If Jews got chutzpah, homos got (poop)chutespah. An entire generation has been raised to associate the beautiful rainbow and the term ‘pride’ with homos, trannies, fecal penetration, and pud-or-poon-cutting. So, young children, upon seeing a rainbow, think ‘gay!!!’ Upon hearing the term ‘pride’, they think ‘gay!!!’ As if that isn't enough to stoke their egos, even food items are homoshered. (Jews insisted all foods to be kosherized, and now homos want all foods to be homosherized.) So, there have been homo-colored Oreo cookies. Burger King came up with ‘Pride Burger’. (Burger King might as well rename itself Bugger King.) Starbucks is always ‘pride this’ and ‘pride that’. (It might as well rename itself Starbuttfuc*s.)

And the Jews who control Facebook and Google add homo-themed doodles, symbols, and icons all over. It’s like a waiter sprinkling curry on every dish you order. Imagine you order pizza, but its sprinkled with ‘pride spice’ of curry. Suppose you order ice cream, and you get the same thing. The tutti-fruities are now a bunch of Toots who push Tootalitarianism on everything. Every TV show or popular movie must have a positive homo or tranny character. Ads feature homo ‘parents’. It used to be that every hotel room came with a Bible. Now, every social network platform, every other show, and every other product come with homo-this or homo-that. And every city is inundated with a ‘Pride’ parade that celebrates decadence and degeneracy of Jewish-financed-and-promoted globalism. But as if that isn’t enough, homos have even pushed their perversion as the new holiness into churches. And most European churches and most mainline churches in the US have complied to this insanity. According to Homomania-Queertianity, there is no higher purpose or meaning to God and Jesus than blessing homo fecal penetration and pud-and-poon-mutilation. People like Tim Cook and even the current pope(who should be called the Poop) say God blessed with certain people with homosexuality. (I suppose God also blessed pedophiles, incest-sexuals, and bestiality-practitioners with their hankerings.) According to the vain and narcissistic pseudo-theology of Queertianity, one need not make an effort to rectify and save oneself to atone before God but, instead, bend the meaning and purpose of God to bless one’s predilections, orientation, and indulgences. If Alcoholics Anonymous followed the model of Queertianity, everyone would just drink and drink in the conviction that God gave them alcoholic tendencies that must be indulged to the fullest. So, if Tim Cook spends his life by having other men ram their penises into his bunghole and ejaculate sperm to mingle with his fecal waste material, it’s because GOD blessed him with such wonders of sexual deviance. When we see homo colors take over one church after another, it should be plain-as-day that the cause of ‘gay rights’ hid something sinister: The project of instituting Homomania as Gay Rites, a neo-religion of the West. But more crucially, this was more the project of Jews than homos themselves, even though, homos and trannies, in all their bitchy and hissy megalomania, were fully onboard with this enterprise of self-apotheosis. Why did Jews feed on homo-and-tranny vanity? Because Jews have always loathed Christianity as a religion stolen from Jews by dimwit goyim. Prior to Christian conversions among goyim, God only belonged to Jews. God only favored Jews. Sure, God sometimes punished Jews because they acted badly, but God never favored goyim over Jews. But with Christianity, there was the idea that the New Covenant didn’t belong to any particular Tribe but to those of all tribes who would convert to the New Faith. What had been a well-contained and organic religion of the Jews went ‘viral’ and turned ‘cancerous’ and spread out across so much of humanity that came to not only outnumber Jews but revile Jews. (No wonder Susan Sontag called the white race the 'cancer of humanity.) After all, Christianity didn’t just claim to go beyond Jews but condemned Jews as the killers of the Son of God. Imagine that. The very people who invented the one and only God got blamed for killing His Son. Buddhism, as outgrowth of Hinduism, never attacked Hinduism in such manner. Roman mythology, as outgrowth of Greek mythology, didn’t attack the latter in such manner. But Christianity, though having arisen from Judaism, made Jews out to be the worst folks(after pagans). Then, it is no wonder that Jews welcomed the arrival of Islam that, though not exactly nice to Jews, waged war on Christendom and, at the very least, acknowledged and respected Jews as fellow People of the Book. If not for the rise of Islam, the chances are all that all of the Middle East and North Africa would have become Christian, and then Jews would have been condemned for Deicide not only by European Christians but by Arab and other kinds of Christians. (Indeed, the current forms of Christianity that remain theologically most anti-Jewish are in the Third World. Not having fully emerged into modernity, people in such nations are much more likely to accept literally whatever is written in the New Testament. So, if it says in the Good Book that Jews done it, they believe it. This is one reason why Jews loath the spread of Christianity around the world and want to replace it with something else as the hegemonic voice of the West.) If not for the creation of Israel and Zionist interests in MENA(Middle East and North Africa), World Jewry could be far more favorable to Arabs and Muslims. After all, Jews find Muslims useful in the West as such folks are far removed from political tensions between Jews and Arabs in the Middle East. Once the Muslim population is firmly ensconced in the West, Jews find them most useful as demographic and cultural armies against whites & Christians. It is only because of the Zionist vs Arab conflict that some Jews in the West see the necessity of fanning white/Christian animus against them ‘Muzzies’ and ‘ragheads’ who are featured mostly as Terrorists in Jew-run Hollywood movies and TV shows.

Anyway, Jews are riding high right now with Homomania. They are amazed and delighted with how fast it caught on in the West and even parts of the non-West. Jews know how power works. Jews know that most people are sheeple and are easily swayed by the elites. So, in order to spread Homomania around the world, Jews only needed to bribe, blackmail, or brainwash the non-Jewish elites of the academia, media, law, finance, and the state. Even if most people were to object to Homomania, the fact is they rely on mass media for information, mass entertainment for escapism & enjoyment, and mass education for their children. So, it’s only a matter of time before something like Miscegenation or Homomania is normalized among the masses. After all, the Nazi monopoly of media soon made majority of Germans supportive of Hitler. And monopoly of media in Stalin’s USSR made the majority worship Stalin as a god-man and their children grew up as fanatical communists(for whom all other ideologies were either false or evil). People are like reeds swaying in the wind. Elites control the winds, and most people-as-reeds blow in one way or another. So, there was no need for Jews to go door-to-door(like Jehovah’s Witnesses) to win the hearts and minds of individuals. They only needed to alter and reprogram the New Normal at the top/center, and then, it was only a matter of time before the majority just followed like sheep. It’s like Google doesn’t need to go door-to-door to change the programming in every computer. They only need to alter the coding in their headquarters, and then, ALL computers around the world work according to the new algorithms.
Not only do Jews understand that Elite Control is most crucial but that people are swayed less by ideas and reason than by idols/icons and sensation. After all, religions have outlasted ideologies. And Catholicism and Orthodox have outlasted Protestantism that has, for the most part, been austere and spartan, void of iconography and idolatry. Indeed, the most successful brand of Protestantism in the US is Evangelicalism that is passionate, bombastic, and rapturous. The more subdued Mainline churches have either faded away into crusty irrelevance or sought rejuvenation with homo colors. Religions outlast ideologies because of the power of the irrational-inspirational. It's like people find more meaning in astrology than in astronomy. Furthermore, ideologies that hope to survive turn into ‘idologies’ because worship and rituals are more inspiring and exciting than logic-and-thought. After all, an ideology can be called into question or discredited IF new thinkers find fault in it. But if it is worshiped as an ‘idology’ with sacred icons and rituals — as with the cult of personality around Stalin or Mao — , then the masses will likely worship it like religious folks worship God.
That said, serious ideologies and religions have one disadvantage in the Age of Entertainment. Ideologies tend to have fixed ideas(or dogma) and idols/icons. In the end, communism got boring year after year because of the same rallies, same icons(Marx, Engels, Lenin), and same slogans. What had been an object of passion and commitment became the same-old-same-old. And religions now seem boring to modern people raised on the New Normal of fads and fashions. Because certain ideas, icons, and themes are sacred in religion, they can’t be toyed with like styles and wiles of fashion industry and entertainment. In our Attention-Deficit world, people are fashion-addicts who crave Something New all the time. Granted, most of what is New is just repackaged or recycled Old, but don’t tell that to a nation of amnesiacs. They are satisfied with the semblance of the New. Even though Pop Culture and Fashion are about short-lived trends and here-today-gone-tomorrow celebrity, that very transient nature is what makes them so resilient and powerful. They are less about attachment to one dominant idea, attitude, or style than about the continual search for something New. Change is the constant,and people find it exciting.
And this is one reason why Homomania has caught on with so many people. It glows and glitters with the iconic colors of the ‘rainbow’, and every ‘Pride’ parade, like the Mardi Gras or Brazilian samba festival, offers new fashions and styles of celebration and revelry. It is especially appealing to affluent white people because Homomania in the West is implicitly white. Even though affluent yuppie types denounce White Identity and embrace Diversity, they still prefer white neighborhoods to non-white ones(especially crime-ridden black ones), and they find the blatantly anti-white rhetoric of PC and Multi-Culturalism trying at times. Most time of the year, white progs are supposed to be in apologetic mode toward non-whites. But come Homo Season, they can celebrate 'Pride' that is overwhelmingly white in expression.
But then, around the world different peoples have varying reasons for embracing Homomania. Prior to the US legalizing ‘gay marriage’, European nations, Mexico, and Canada regarded Homomania as anti-American. The so-called ‘progressives’ in those nations saw the struggle as between revolutionary support for Homosexual Rights versus Evil Christo-Fascist America that oppresses innocent blacks and pure-as-snow Homos. Especially during the Bush II years, many peoples around the world defied the US by embracing the homo agenda against Evangelical Crusader Bush. They thought they were being anti-American. (Because the US is so ahead in science, technology, military power, and pop-cultural capital, other nations hope to best the US in something, and the cheapest & easiest way to appear 'more evolved' is by embracing whatever that's deemed to be the latest in progressive thought.) They were blind, often willfully, to the fact that the Real Rulers of the US are Jewish globalists who’ve been the main funders of Homomania around the world. (While homosexual culture and struggle for homosexual rights didn’t originate in the US or even with Jews, Homomania-as-a-neo-religion is essentially the baby of Jewish-American Globalists.) Amusingly enough, all those anti-American progs around the world who opposed and defied American Power by embracing Homomania were actually dupes and tools of the Real American Power held by Jews. Indeed, Bush II was also a tool of Jewish Globalists who cynically manipulated patriotism and Christian-Zionism to maneuver Bush into waging these Wars for Israel. As they say, Follow the Money. The money trail in the US and EU(and elsewhere) leads to Jewish control of both ‘conservatives’ and ‘liberals’. Whether one is ‘anti-liberal’ or ‘anti-conservative’ in the US, it all boils down to ‘We love Jews more’ and ‘We support Israel more’.

With 80% of sheeple Americans now supporting ‘gay marriage’ and shedding tears(or wetting their pants) over Holy Homo nonsense, surely Jews are confident that they’ve succeeded in replacing the much dreaded-and-reviled(among Jews) Christianity with the new faith of Homomania or Queertianity. After all, in the new US, you will never lose your job or get in trouble for mocking Jesus, Mary, or Disciples. (The most famous person named ‘madonna’ is a skanky pop star whose second act in a mostly sordid career was the worship of the black dong.) But if you say anything that is critical of homos & trannies and their chosen lifestyles, you are shrilly condemned for ‘homophobia’, ‘transphobia’, ‘hate’, ‘intolerance’, ‘exclusion’, ‘bigotry’, and hounded, fired, & blacklisted. (The only reason the stupid Negress Joy Reid survived despite her critical posts about homos in her past blog is because she is black, which makes her a holy person: The Holy Three are Jews, Homos, and Negroes.) Now, even many ‘conservatives’ are onboard in condemning anyone who has unkind words for stuff like homo fecal penetration or tranny penis-cutting. As Jews command the top of the food-chain in the US, there’s a trickle-down effect that shapes all of society. Just like Jews in pre-Emancipation Europe couldn’t enter into certain professions or careers as Jews and had to convert to Christianity to gain fuller access, there is little chance of anyone today making the socio-economic climb into spheres of privilege UNLESS he or she professes enthusiasm for Homomania. One must be ‘born-again’ into Homomania if not raised with Homomania from cradle. All politicians in big cities must show up at Homo ‘pride’ parades just like everyone-who-was-anyone had to take part in Communist parades in the Soviet Union. Jews find Homomania more useful than Zionism in gaining mastery over goyim. While AIPAC, ADL and other Zionist organizations do their best to pressure all members of American political and economic elites to support Israel, the problem is it sends a message to Americans and the World that Jews Control Everything and that All Politicians & Businessmen are Whores of Jews(if not Jewish themselves). Even though Jews relish their supremacist power, they are nervous about people noticing that Jews got Too Much Power. So, Jews use Homomania as a front and proxy for Jewish Power. As Jews are the main funders of Homomania(that also has powerful Jewish homos and trannies), Homo Power is essentially Jewish Power. It’s like Neoconservatism isn’t explicitly Jewish and has prominent non-Jews among its members, but it is essentially a Zionist-supremacist ideology. Now, if anti-Jewish forces were to take control of Homomania and use it to attack Jewish power and Zionism, Jews may have a change of heart. But Jews have created, shaped, and controlled Homomania from the beginning. It is so closely entwined with Jewish power that it is as crytpo-Jewish as Neconservatism and Tory Party of UK(that is sometimes called the Torah Party). There have been attempts by some people, including Jewish homos like Glenn Greenwald, to re-jigger Homomania as a weapon against Jewish power and Zionism. So, there are images of Palestinian Homos waving the homo flag in opposition to Israel tyranny. Or some in the BLM wave the homo flag and denounce Israeli policy as Apartheid. But those are anomalies than the norm. The fact is Homomania was, is, and will be a Jewish Baby. Also, if Christianity was the Baby of heretical Jews who were rejected by the Core Jewish Community, Homomania has been approved and embraced by the Core. Jews love it because Homomania tells the overwhelming majority of straight people to bow down at the altar of Homo Elite Minority Privilege. This dynamic complements the idea that the vast majority of non-Jews should revere and serve the Jewish Supremacist Minority Elites. In other words, Jews love Homomania because its Elite-Minoritarian outlook parallels Jewish minority-elite-supremacism. The fact that so many people haven’t yet figured this out goes to show what total morons and dummies most sheeple are.

At any rate, Jews are feeling so awesome and powerful because they managed to replace Christianity with Homomania. After all, the Jewish-globalist-supremacists Google ignore Easter every year but go all out to promote, celebrate, and ‘iconize’ Homomania. Again, this isn’t merely for ‘gay rights’ but for Gay Rites, an effort to elevate Homomania as the new-religion of the West and the World, which is why Jews even push the madness on Latin America, Asia, and Africa. In their ambition at least, Homomaniacs are like early Christians who weren’t merely asking for religious freedom and tolerance BUT eyeing to one day take over the Roman Empire, spread the faith to everyone, and smash all competing faiths and practices of paganism. Early Christians weren’t satisfied with something as humdrum as ‘Christian rights’ to be left alone to worship as they please. They were absolutely convinced that their Faith was the only true Faith, must prevail over the empire, and wage total war on all false idols and rituals. When Christians didn’t destroy or remove pagan temples or iconography, they took them over and remolded them to serve and represent Christianity. In the same way, Homomaniacs are now taking over Christian churches and reinterpreting the Faith to be about God and Jesus blessing holy homos. Likewise, when Muslim Turks took over Constantinople, they didn’t smash all Christian churches and symbols. They took over some of them and remade them into Mosques in honor of Allah and Muhammad.
Homos and trannies should never have been trusted in the realm of power because, by their innate nature, they are excessively vain, narcissistic, hissy, bitchy, sneering-and-sniveling, and whoopee-pee-poo. Indeed, homos must make an extra, indeed herculean, effort to boost their pride and confidence because what they do is so obviously foul and ewwww. I mean, what good thing can one say about homo fecal penetration, let alone stuff like ‘fisting’? That's some ‘gay’ shit. There is even less pride about a guy wanting to have his penis and balls removed to get a fake vagina. Because there is no natural pride to such behavior, homos and trannies must go all out and shoot themselves with artificial-pride-as-emotional-steroids to feel so good about themselves. Indeed, it takes some chutzpah or (poop)chutespah to claim the term ‘pride’ to be synonymous with homos having their asses rammed with penises or trannies having their puds or poons mutilated to get fake genitals. But then, this total weirdness may paradoxically be quasi-spiritually appealing to so many globalist proggy types. Though too educated and secular to literally believe in God and miracles, they nevertheless have some spiritual longing encoded in their DNA. They long for miracles in a world without miracles. So, when they see some man ‘magically’ transform into a 'woman' or vice versa, it's like a secular version of the modern-day miracle.

Jewish Globalist Supremacist may be celebrating their great victory, but things can easily turn against them. How is this possible, you may ask? After all, both the non-Jewish elites and the great majority of the masses are for ‘gay marriage’ and onboard with Homomania. Even Christian churches have bent over to take it up the ass with homo colors. All Democratic politicians worship Homomania, many Republican politicians endorse it, and even those who haven’t converted to the Homo faith dare not oppose it openly. Among politicians, it is well-known that Homomania is a Jewish proxy, and therefore, opposing Homomania means infuriating Jews. It’d be like a US politician favoring Palestinians over Zionist imperialists. Despite the Constitutional concept of Separation of Church and State, the fact is the current US is a deeply quasi-theological in its practice of power. The cult of MLK, the Shoah, and Homomania are essentially State Religions. They aren't matters of individual conscience or personal creed. They must be embraced and worshiped by anyone who wishes to make it in government or succeed in business, law, academia, or media. And their Narratives must be accepted at Face Value. They cannot be questioned or argued with. Did 6 million die in the Shoah and were Jews totally guiltless throughout history? You better believe it... or else you are a ‘Denier’ and ‘antisemitic Nazi’. Did white people have absolutely NO legitimate reason for discrimination against blacks even though blacks are naturally more muscular, tougher, and more aggressive? Yes, you better believe it or else you are ‘racist’ who has no place in America. And you better believe that MLK, the degenerate pervert thug, was not only a saint but a figure greater than God and Jesus. And you better believe that Homos are the new angels, miraculous creatures of joy and wonder. If you disagree, you are a ‘homophobe’. The mindless sacraments for these favored groups and the enforcement of taboos against free discussion concerning them suggests that there is a quasi-religious aura that surrounds them. Therefore, in order for the US to truly separate State from Church, we need to promote open discussion and argument about all historical, racial, demographic, and sexual issues. We must not take anything at Face Value for mindless reverence and worship.

Even though something deemed Sacred has greater power than something deemed secular, it is paradoxically more vulnerable for that very reason. At first glance, the Sacred appears shrouded with divinity and protected by taboos. In contrast, a secular item can be freely debated and called into question by skeptics and rationalists. A secular item is always vulnerable to new critiques and analysis. In contrast, the Sacred cannot be touched or questioned. Those who dare do so can be attacked and destroyed as ‘heretical’ or ‘blasphemous’, the PC versions of which are ‘racist’, ‘antisemitic’, or ‘homophobic’. But because the Sacred is so highly regarded, when it begins to lose its luster and iconic status, it fails and falls faster than any secular idea. A secular position can be weakened by reasoned argument but also supported by counter-argument. Thus, there can be a back-and-forth see-sawing between opposing sides. In contrast, once a Sacred Something has been dethroned, it loses its value immediately. It’s like once you know the trick behind the magic, you will never be wowed again. And once you realize that a certain preacher used deception to fool the flock with pseudo-miracles, he can never regain your trust. Or, suppose some guy claims to have magic powers in Martial Arts. Instead of having demonstrated his real ability in the secular arena of the ring, there is an aura around him akin to the Force around Yoda and other Jedi Knights. For those who’ve fallen under the so-called Master’s spell, he might seem invincible and awesome. But all it takes is one real fight to expose him as a fraud, and then his star falls totally and permanently. Sacred cows can become bullshit almost overnight.



Even though Jewish Globalist supremacists and Homomaniacs say they ‘won’ the ‘debate’ and the ‘culture war’, they did nothing of the kind. Jewish ethno-monopoly of the Media only promoted one side while defaming the Other wide as akin to the demented Westboro church. Also, instead of putting forth real ideas and reasoned debates, Jews used the power of icons like ‘rainbow’ homo colors, manipulative ads, and TV shows(and movies and music videos) that idolized homos and then even trannies as a specially blessed people. As Joe Biden said, the acceptance of ‘gay marriage’ had less to do with debate than Mass Media propaganda made possible by Jewish ethno-monopoly of the Media. Of course, Joe Biden blurted this out in total admiration and praise of Jews — he claimed "It was all for the good" — , but he did spill the beans on the extent of Jewish power in the West. Jews, with their ethno-monopoly of media and so much else, can fool masses of dummies and sheeple into believing anything. Of course, what Joe Biden doesn’t mention is the use of gangster-and-bullying tactics as well. Jewish strategy, like that of homos, has always been passive/aggressive. Jews pretend to be nice and pleading for their agenda, but it’s an offer you can’t refuse. If you say NO, Jews will set out to destroy you. So, you better support Israel 100% and you better worship Homomania because, if you don’t, the entire Judeo-Globo-Homo media complex will come after you, like what happened to Carrie Prejean when she said NO to ‘gay marriage’. GET WITH THE PROGRAM, GOY... OR ELSE!!

And Jewish control of finance will cut off funds and loans unless you bend over to Zionism and Homomania. And even non-Jewish and non-Homo companies will, either out of fear or true conviction(as Homomania is the most sacred neo-religion for many cucky-wuck stupid and shallow people), fire you if you defy Homomania. In summation, Jews and Homos didn’t win a clean honest debate to win the ‘culture war’ but cheated, used smoke-and-mirrors tactics, and threatened people with dire consequences if they were to resist. Imagine you’re a boxer preparing for a fight. But while the promoters make your opponent out to be cool and wonderful, you are made to be a lowlife thug scumbag. And then, you get a message that if you fight back against your opponent for real, you will be financially destroyed and your house will be burned down. And then, the referee allows your opponent to do anything, even low-blows and eye-gouging, while you are penalized for having done nothing wrong. You have no choice but to take a dive. THAT is how Homomania won in the arena of US culture & politics officiated by vile Jewish supremacist a**holes as corrupt promoters and referees. Likewise, Zionism never won a honest debate in the US. Anyone who looks at the facts would have to admit Palestinians got a raw deal, were terribly wronged, and continue to live under humiliation. But notice all US politicians support Israel. Even when Israel pummels Gaza and kills women and children, the entire Congress pledges to support Israel and stand with Israel. There is NOTHING about Palestinians and their plight. So, what Jews did to Palestinians and their supporters in the US, they did the same to sane, decent, and moral people who stood firm and said NO to Homomania. It's often been said that Jews won so much of the Culture War because of their superior verbal intelligence, but that's not the main reason. It had more to do with Jews controlling the media, rigging the perimeters of permissible discourse, using loaded terms like 'antisemitic' and 'homophobic', and underhandedly threatening financial ruin on their opponents. Edward Said had high verbal intelligence, but how often was he featured on the MSM? No matter how intelligently and factually you expose Zionist lies and terrorism, the Rigged Narrative and Terminology will brand you an 'anti-Semite' and ban you from 'respectable' and 'acceptable' discourse. Of course, Jews themselves can push any nonsense they wish, like the hysteria about Russia Hacking the 2016 election. Many in the Alt Right could easily defeat Neocons and their ilk in open debates, but they are shut out of media and college lecture tours because their views have been deemed by Jewish supremacist power as 'unacceptable' and 'toxic'. There are plenty of BDS people, some of them Jews, who could take on any Zionist in a debate, but they are virtually shut out of MSM and banned from certain colleges. Trying to be heard in an honest and open battle of ideas is now as difficult as it was for Jake Lamotta to secure a title shot in a sports so overwhelmingly dominated by Jewish gangsters and the mafia. The Jewish ducks(who duck honest fights and debates) will only allow cucks. American Discourses is mostly about Jewish ducks and goy cucks.

And yet, precisely because Jews and Homos won so unfairly, their sacred cows are so easy to call bullshit on. The Zionist Narrative on the Israel-Palestinian conflict is now unraveling so fast that Jewish Power has to push its whore-politicians to criminalize and shut down BDS. But doing so will only embolden more critics of Israel to come forth and say Enough Is Enough. Indeed, even many young Jews are calling BS on what is being done to Palestinians. Especially as the Internet is a great equalizer and has given Palestinians and their advocates a platform to get their messages across, the bogus Sacred Cow of Zionist-Hegemonism is eroding. Sure, Jews still have immense power and monopoly of so-called ‘mainstream media’ and internet platforms, but it’s difficult to play whack-a-mole with so many opposing voices. Youtube and Facebook, both Jewish-owned, work closely with Zionist organizations like ADL and SPLC(funded mainly by Jews) to deny voice to anti-Zionist voices, but there are Too Many now. And things are getting so bad in Gaza that the Sikh whore Nikki Haley(who sucks Zionist cock 24/7 and swallows) is finding it ever harder to bully or bribe other nations to kiss Israeli ass.

Precisely because false beliefs have no basis in fact or evidence, they have to be sanctified with fake holiness, protected by taboos, and promoted with mindless hysteria. As such, they may seem invincible for awhile, but they've been waxed with the sheen of invulnerability precisely because they are so vulnerable. Consider the sudden fall of Ceausescu in Romania. He was a total hack with no special talent or vision. He even had a speech impediment, especially problematic for a leader. So, he created a ridiculous cult of personality around himself and his wife. And for awhile, he seemed to ride high, and the masses seem to worship him. But once it became obvious that he was a phony, the cult around him rang hollow, and his fall was total and brutal. This is why the fatso in North Korea is afraid of real change. As his just a third-rate fat-boy, the only claim to power is the aura around his dynasty. Once that goes, people will laugh him as Boy Pig, and his fall can be swift and brutal. Even estimable leaders with genuine ability & talent — Stalin, Hitler, Mao, Castro, and etc. — needed to surround themselves with the cult of greatness to hold sway over the masses during trying times. Even so, when they began to believe in their own myths, they brought about disasters like WWII or the Great Leap Forward. And even Stalin, who weathered the storms, defeated Germany, and was admired around the world as a great statesman, soon became a near non-person in the very nation he'd built a few years after his death. By the late 1950s, Stalin was hardly featured in Soviet iconography centered around Marx and Lenin. Whatever Stalin’s achievements(some of which were great), the fact is the cult-of-personality around him went far beyond reality, decency, and proportionality. Therefore, his overblown iconic status had to be deflated and shelved in order for the Soviet Union to be a normal nation with real expectations.

Today, the Holy Three of the West are Jews-with-Shoah, Blacks-with-MLK-cult, and Homos-as-angels. Because of the quasi-religious aura and sanctimony around them, they seem invulnerable. But that very advantage is their fatal weakness. After all, spiritual aura, especially around secular entities, is not based on anything real or provable. While it’s true that Shoah happened, there is nothing in history or reality that says a people are forever-holy-and-innocent because of a horrible tragedy that befell them in a particular place and time. This is true of Jews and blacks. It is ridiculous to judge all their past existences and future destinies in relation to Shoah or Atlantic Slave Trade(or Jim Crow that was hardly one of the great injustices in world history). As for Homomania, it is a total joke, a pure fabrication by the utterly corrupt and degenerate Jew-run media.
At any rate, decent, sane and sober people must not approach the Holy Three as matters for secular debate but as false-religions that need to be exposed and false-idols that must be toppled. It is totally irrational and insane to assume that because Jews suffered Shoah, they were always pure & innocent and shall be wise & noble indefinitely no matter what they do. As for blacks, the fact is they were brutal savages for 100,000s of yrs before they were brought to the New World. And even though slavery had its ugly and dark side, the main reason for black problem is not history but biology, or BAMMAMA: Blacks are more muscular and more aggressive. We need to prick the bubble of Black Holiness that would have us believe blacks would have Wakandas all over the world if not for ‘evil racist honkey’. And MLK, though an important figure in an important social movement, was no saint but a punk, boor, and thug in reality. As for Homomania, it’s some bogus neo-Golden-Calf mass cult that fools us into thinking homosexuality is mainly about ‘rainbow’ colors than gross fecal penetration among men. It is putrid and demented, the product of mindless hype pushed by Jew-run media, entertainment, and finance. We need to approach the Holy Three like we approach Televangelists, false preachers, charlatans, cults(like Scientology), and other nonsense.

Even though I’ve never been religious and don’t believe in God or Satan, I would still say Homomania is satanic. Even if Satan doesn’t literally exist, certain things are so sick, demented, vile, and disgusting that they might as well be the work of the Devil if he existed. And even though I’m not a Christian, I’m deeply offended when Homo degenerates befoul a Christian church with homo colors or mock a Buddhist site with their putrid air of contempt. One doesn’t have to be a believer to acknowledge or admire the great visions and deep values those religions stand for. There is a reason why Christianity and Buddhism resonated so deeply with so many people for so long. And same can be said for Judaism and Islam(albeit to a lesser extent perhaps). It really takes a satanic mindset to associate those faiths with Worship of Holy Homo. Only a sick soul would drape a Christian church with colors associated with homo fecal penetration, bathhouse follies, or tranny penis-cutting. Only twisted ultra-narcissistic deviants could take Ass-selfies in front a monument to Buddha.

Never mind the Ugly American. In the Age of Homomania, we have the Butt-Fugly American. These homo degenerates' idea of appreciating culture and spirituality is to take Ass-selfies in front of Buddhist Temples. But what do you expect from homo tourists from a nation that now drapes churches with homo colors and practices Gay Rites as the highest expression of sanctimony?

Jews think they are winning with Homomania. They think they are digging for the ultimate gold to control the world with a neo-religion of their own making. But they could be digging their own grave because it will be a matter of time before people wake up to the fact that Homomania is really Satanic-Jewish-christianity or SJC. Once the scales begin to fall from the eyes of the people who realize that they’ve been duped, messed up, and mocked by vile, disgusting, and sinister Jewish globalist supremacists, they will begin to wake up fast and reject the false religion of Homomania. The fall of Homomania will be like the fate of Humpty-Dumpty or Ceausescu cult. It can never be put together again. When Jesus died on the Cross, it seemed like the end of Him and His movement. But what He’d stood for and preached was so deep, profound, and moving(even if impossible) that a great Narrative could be spun from it and proselytized as a great religion. And it is why Christianity has lasted for so long and even survived communism. But the foundation of Homomania is total nonsense and filth.
Now, the homo struggle in the form of ‘gay rights’ was legitimate to the extent that it’s a fact that some people are born homo, and it is not their fault for being what they are and in having deviant sexual preferences. So, it only seemed right not to treat homos as ‘mentally sick’ individuals to be banned from jobs and housing. But once homos and then even trannies were promoted as saints and angels whose lifestyles are akin to the miracle of the rainbow and deserving of mass ‘pride’ parades, society went the way of Sodom-and-Gomorrah. And then, when the meaning of marriage, the most important institution of humanity, was desecrated to appease homos and to conflate the homo fecal penetration & tranny penis-cutting with the real sexuality of men and women that produce the miracle of life, the West became a sick and evil civilization. And then, when people’s lives were ruined financially and/or professionally because they refused to comply with Homomaniacal decrees, like baking ‘gay wedding cakes’, the homos and their Jewish globalist supremacists revealed their true face of utter wickedness. And then, when homo colors were even pushed into churches, only the stupid and retarded can keep with the BS that homo agenda is a secular and rational program. If so, why are homos even targeting churches for takeover? No, the fact is Homomania is a satanic Jewish agenda to replace Christianity, a true and great religion, with a false religion of their own making. It’s like THE OMEN series where Satan produces a counter-messiah to take over the world. One doesn’t have to be religious to see the utter wickedness of Jewish Globalist Supremacists. Not all Jews are onboard with this craziness, but unfortunately, the majority of them are, just like, at one time, majority of Germans supported the psychopath Hitler.
Jews did this. They did it to humanity, civilization, morality, and spirituality. It is a great evil. Jews are dancing with joy in victory and triumph, but a false religion cannot last for long. It’s only a matter of time before it is outed and exposed. And we need to speak out and tell the world that Homomania = Satanic Jewish christianity, i.e. Jewish attempt to replace Christianity(or any other great religion or philosophy like Buddhism, Islam, Hinduism, or Confucianism) with a cynically concocted Global Cult of their making. Whenever we discuss Homomania, we must mention that it is not a secular movement but a neo-religion, and we must state loud-and-clear that it is the creation of Jewish radicals, Jewish globalists, and Jewish financiers. Make Jews own the filth they foisted upon the world. Tell the people of every nation that IF they cuck out to Homomania, they are effectively bending over to be fuc*ed in the ass by Jewish Globalist supremacism. No people who respect their own tradition, culture, heritage, and forefathers could do such a thing to their own nation. When pressured by Jews to embrace Homomania, people must stand firm, look straight in the eyes of Jewish supremacism, and say "I don't worship Homomania. I have my own religion or value system, and if I pay respect to anything, it is the line of my ancestors who bequeathed a rich and meaningful culture to me and my people."

We need to expose the true nature of the Homo Agenda, connect it to the Jewish globalist enablers, and then tell the whole world. Once peoples around the world come to realize that Homomania is the latest instrument of Zionist-American cultural imperialism and pseudo-spiritual crusade, the tide will turn.
And once all these idiotic Millennials realize that their lives, sensibilities, and morals have been compromised and degraded by kneeling before the altar of the Homo as the holiest icon and highest value in the world, they will crave real answers and real truth. And it is then that the Truth — Homomania = Satanic Jewish christianity — will hit them like a bolt of lightning, and they will reach for true meaning and justice.

From Extreme Virtue-as-Vice to Extreme Vice-as-Virtue: The Pathway to the Fall of the West

Many of us would like to live in a world of virtue. But utopias have failed time and time again. It is a hubris to think that we can create heaven on earth. People are not saints, and too often, the Rulers of Virtue have proven to be fanatical, arrogant, corrupt, and/or cynical. Che Guevara and Osama Bin Laden were purists committed to the Cause but pathological like Robespierre. Others talk the talk of virtue while grabbing everything for themselves. Communist regimes all came to be ruled by people not unlike the corrupted pigs at the end of ANIMAL FARM by George Orwell. The problem isn’t just disagreement as to what constitutes the best virtues or the ideal utopia. Even if everyone were to agree 100% on theory and blueprint, the problem of ego and vanity often get in the way of achieving the dream.

Therefore, even though it’s necessary for people to be as good as possible, we mustn’t be perfectionist in our expectations and execution. There must be leeway for failings and mistakes, a chance for redemption and improvement. Also, even good people are still animals and, as such, always under the temptation to deviate from the straight and narrow path of virtue. They need to blow off steam at times and even get a bit wild. The wild-animal side of us will always be there, just like a well-trained dog remains an animal and feels the urge to run wild and free once in a while.

This is why theocracies and ideocracies don’t make ideal societies. Theocracies may be committed to God and the Holy Truth. And its leaders may stress piety and sanctimony. And the masses may go along or pretend to. But man cannot know the mind of God. Sacred texts serve as guide but can’t ascertain what God wants us to do at every moment. There are innumerable ways to interpret God and sacred texts. Also, if we were to follow certain texts to the letter, it may well lead to our demise. Imagine what would happen if the West decided to truly live by the letter of Christianity, "Turn the other cheek" and all that. Also, crazy people can believe they have a special rapport with God. A crazy person is dangerous enough but when claiming to be the spokesman of God, all the more dangerous. More often than not, people just project their wishes onto God and then say God told them so-and-so. And we know from Televangelists that there is no shortage of charlatans and lunatics who use religion to turn people into suckers or fellow looneys.

Also, even if all the leaders and all the people of a theocracy may be good, decent, and virtuous, much of human progress comes not from virtue but from violations of norms. In other words, we must give Devil his due in stoking our egos, greed, vanity, and narcissism to seek further, strive harder, reach higher, and push it to the limit. So many of the great feats of mankind couldn’t have been achieved without hubris, greed, obsession, and/or megalomania.
Indeed, even religious prophets had something of the madman. Hubris is self-defeating in the end, but the reason why the West achieved more than other civilizations is it made greater room for egoism of the individual for whom enough was never enough(in fame, fortune, knowledge, discovery, and/or daring). Trying to climb Mt. Everest may have been foolish and egotistical, but someone did it because of the sheer audacity to do the impossible. Same with going to the Moon. So, there is a Faustian side to human progress, something that tends to be suppressed by theocracies that stress piety and humility before the Great Truth.

There is also the problem of violence and cruelty in theocracies and ideocracies. Being intolerant in their insistence on virtue, they tend to be brutal in suppressing dissenters, dissidents, and deviants. People who are perceived to be ‘different’ aren’t deemed only wrong or incorrect but evil or wicked. Therefore, so many people were burnt at the stake as witches. So many people were stoned to death for blasphemy. So many people were sent to the Gulag or shot in the head. Or they were made to sit through grueling sessions of re-education that was like mental torture. All such may have been done in the name of virtue(and sincerely too), but the sheer intolerance made for a repressive and fearful social order. Also, because such orders favor mediocrities who stick to dogma, there develops a pathological hatred for anyone who exhibits individual streak or spark. People who think or act differently are hated not only for being incorrect or impious but for having the audacity and daring to step away from the herd and assert his self-worth. Such courage makes the rest of the herd look craven and cowardly, and therefore, the man of daring is attacked not only for heresy but for heart. A repressive social order creates a community of cowards. But cowards don’t want to admit to their cowardice, which masquerades as collective conviction. And when a man of real courage comes forth and speaks otherwise, the cowards are triggered by his nerves and cooperate to silence and break him, not least to win approval from their masters. As such, a society committed to extreme virtue could actually turn into an inadvertent world of vice.

Therefore, even though virtue is to be valued, we don’t need a Virtutopia or Virtuocracy. People need to be more-or-less virtuous, and society must be governed by men of some virtue, but we can’t expect heaven on earth. We mustn’t be perfectionist with humanity, and we have to allow for differences, deviance, and even failings. Of course, society must stress virtue and use all its institutions, from family to education to government, to maintain a world of virtue. But society mustn’t expect heaven-on-earth of humble saints ruled by angelic sage-kings.

Now, what are the virtues and truths that make for a good society? Virtues warn against excesses of our natures. Everything good can become bad when pushed to excess. Appreciation of food, a necessity for survival and health, can turn into gluttony. The joys of sex can turn into out-of-control lust than basis for marriage and family. (Billy Boy Clinton is a classic example of a man unmade by excessive lust.) Even industriousness can turn into a kind of sickness, as with workaholic Ebenezer Scrooge. Even saintliness can become a vice-of-sorts. Surely, a man who is overly generous and selfless will be exploited by others. And being so busy giving to and living for others, he will never have a family for himself or have the urge to defend his own people and culture. This is why Christianity is a problematic religion. If not for the notion of Jesus as the Son of God, His excessive selfless devotion to mankind could be seen almost as a vice that did more harm than good. Christianity as a practiced religion is workable only because Jesus is said to be the Son of God, so He could go all the way in being perfect in virtue. However, it would be foolish for most of us to try to be like Him because we are not the Son of God and will just get whupped real bad without the resurrection and all that stuff. This is why it is said Jesus died for our sins. He did what we can’t be expected to do because we are not the Messiah. Most likely, we’ll end up like the guy in the Luis Bunuel film NAZARIN.
Furthermore, it must be stressed that Jesus’ message was NOT about saving the World or Humanity as a collective. Rather, it was about saving souls, and souls are individual possessions. Each person has his or her own soul, and each soul can be saved only on the individual level. Your people cannot be blessed or saved as a collective. You can’t ride on the good qualities of your people, just like you are not to be condemned by the bad qualities of your people. When it comes to Christian salvation, you must open up your own heart. Just because most people in your community are deemed good by God and will go to Heaven, it doesn't mean YOU get to hop on some collective magic carpet ride. The question is, "has your individual soul made a sincere effort to be nearer to God?"

For non-believers like most people on the Neo-Fascist Nationalist Humanist movement, it’s neither here nor there because we don’t believe in the godly and spiritual. Still, for those who do consider themselves as Christians on basis of faith, belief, or conviction — those with conviction may not literally believe in the Christian mythology but embrace what Jesus and Disciples stood for — , they need to remind themselves that Christianity was never meant to be about saving the world or humanity. Souls can only be saved on the individual level. It’s like what Jesus said to the crucified persons next to Him. They were all in the same boat. All crushed by the Romans. But Jesus offered salvation to the repentant but not to the repugnant. The problem with current Christianity is it goes for collective blessing and redemption. So, because blacks were slaves in the past, they are supposed to be holy as a collective. Christianity doesn’t work that way. You could have suffered a lot, but if you’re a lout and punk, you will not be saved. Indeed, Jesus was a very pessimistic figure and didn’t think highly of humanity and the world. He didn’t think either could be saved in its entirety or as a collective. The only thing that could be saved were individual souls that would repent. He would be the spiritual ark that would save them from the flood of puss and take them to Heaven. At any rate, the faithful can believe Jesus had such power because He is the Son of God. But even the most devoted Christian would be stupid to try to be like Jesus because he would get his ass whupped and that'd be that.

Anyway, let me try to illustrate why Moderate but Firm defense of Virtue with Tolerance for Vice is better than Extreme Virtue but then how the worst thing is Extreme Vice, especially when it pushes itself as the New Virtue. Consider the following options:

1. Extreme Virtue with zero tolerance of Vice. Theoretically, this sounds like the best possible world. An Eden where there is no evil. After all, what is wrong with a world where there is only good and no evil? The problem is we live in reality, not in theory. We heard of Eden and other Golden Ages in religions and mythologies, but we never saw one in reality. If there is to be Eden, there has to be an all-knowing God. We can conceive of such a Being, but we are not Him. And we can never know what He really wants and intends for us. Only God can create Eden or some utopia. Also, even the Bible says that man, being what he is, ruined Eden. And in Buddhism, it is said that the 'perfect' world in which Siddhartha grew up was just an illusion.
So, we can’t have Eden or utopia. We can work towards the Better but we don’t know what perfection is. Also, good people can be filled with doubt, whereas bad people can be full of conviction, like in the poem "The Second Coming" by Y. W. Yeats. The best lack all conviction, while the worst are full of passionate intensity.
Now, putting aside the possibility that the satanic can pose itself as angelic, let’s assume the world is to be ruled with an iron-fist by the best and the brightest. Let’s say these people are genuinely intelligent, good-hearted, fair-minded, morally serious, courageous, and filled with integrity. Why shouldn’t such people have total control and use draconian means in favor of virtue against vice? But even genuinely good people are not all-knowing. They too could make mistakes. Even the most brilliant minds cannot foresee the future or understand the full consequences of their actions that seem good and sound at the moment. If the sincerely virtuous stick to the tried-and-true, society will never change and make progress. It will not grow. If the sincerely virtuous are so sure of their reforms, there’s the danger of radicalism. Robespierre was a sincere revolutionary, a man of true integrity and courage. But in the end, he was blinded by his own virtue. His virtue turned into hubris.
It may well be that many of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionaries were sincere men of virtue who sought to transform Iran into a Republic of Virtue in tune with Allah’s wisdom and in opposition to the soulless and materialistic West. Surely, there were among them many men of courage who’d survived persecution and torture. But the righteousness of virtue can easily turn into self-righteousness, and it can blind people to other views and perspectives that, if not equal in value, are nevertheless of some value.
Many communist revolutionaries of Russia, China, Vietnam, and Cuba were men of sincere commitment to the revolution and the creation of the New Man. And they truly believed that Marxism provided the template for creating a new classless order in which all humans would be equal in value and virtue. But in the end, the moral spartanism of communism turned into a prison of body, mind, and soul.
This is why even most Muslims don’t want to live in a Muslim theocracy. And even most Christians don’t want to live in a Christian theocracy. In the end, Theocracies are not ruled by God but by men who claim to speak for God. But some of these Men of God turn out to be corrupt and cynical. Others turn out to be kooky, like the current Pope. Some turn out to be sincere in conviction and seriousness, but that leads to self-righteousness that turns into an iron-fist. Who wants to live in a world ruled by Martin Luther or John Calvin? They were sincere men, but their hearts beat like hammers.

2. Moderate but Firm Virtue but with Tolerance for Vice. This formula sums up the Bourgeois West of the late 19th century and much of the 20th century. This was the basis for Liberal Democracies or Enlightened autocracies. Such an order has a general sense of The Good. Centrality of family, respect for tradition, respect for religion, acceptance of progress based on science and facts, respect for responsible use of reason, admiration for creative talent, appreciation of manners and good habits, meritocracy & Rule of Law, need for duty & diligence, and freedom + responsibility for one’s freedom. This Order of Virtue didn’t claim to have ALL the answers or The Truth. It didn’t claim to speak for God. But based on tradition, reason, caution, and experimentation, it had a general sense of the Good as opposed to the Bad.
And yet, because we don’t know All the Good and All the Bad, it was willing to be tolerant of new attitudes and modes of behavior that may seem ‘bad’ at the moment but might prove to be good or have some worth later. After all, if the History of Art teaches us anything, it’s that the contemporaries often failed to appreciate the seminal works of their time. The most famous example may be Vincent van Gogh, though this idea has been corrupted of late, what with every atrocious and untalented hack being praised to heaven as someone ahead of his or her time(which is total nonsense since much of the Art World is nothing but a hype machine). Because even the most intelligent, well-meaning, and well-intentioned elites can’t know everything about everything, it would be foolish for them to decide what is ACCEPTABLE and what is NOT. They may pass judgement but shouldn’t have the power to say certain expressions should be banned. They could be right at most times, but there is the odd chance that they could be wrong. What they see as ‘vice’ may actually be a new kind of virtue or, even if not a virtue, a thing of some value. The works of Picasso can’t be said to add to moral or social virtue of a civilization but they do have value as works of originality and genius and, as such, add something of value to civilization.

Also, in a liberal democracy, we must accept the fact that some people have different orientations, and we should take a live-and-let-live attitude AS LONG AS people keep it personal and private. So, if homos want to bugger one another or if Paul Johnson the historian wants to be spanked in the ass by a dominatrix, it’s not my business. Or if guys want to get together and drink too much and act the fool over a weekend, let them... as long as they are mindful not to cause harm to others.

3. The Rise of Vice and Tolerance of Virtue. This is very problematic and increasingly became the mode of the West beginning in the late 1960s, culminating in the 1990s. We went from the Bourgeois Order to the Boomer Disorder. There is some good things to be said about the boomers and counterculture. They found their parents to be overly materialistic & ‘plastic’. Flush with new prosperity following WWII, too many of the ‘Greatest Generation’ folks focused on keeping up with the Joneses. It’s like the upper-middle class folks in THE GRADUATE and THE SWIMMER. Naturally, young people wanted to say NO to ‘plastic’ and YES to authenticity. But their mode of self-discovery got enmeshed with indulgence with too much sex, drugs, and rock-n-roll, like with the daughter in PEOPLE NEXT DOOR, the forerunner of THE EXORCIST.

The defining culture of the Boomer generation was Rock Music steeped in reckless hedonism, leering sexuality, youthful exuberance as middle finger to maturity & responsibility, and cool-centrism that favored style over substance, the image over the thing itself, and the instant over longevity. Thus, Vice pushed Virtue to the sidelines. After all, Vice is cool whereas Virtue is square. The nihilistic Eastwood of Spaghetti Westerns and amoral & suave James Bond of 007 movies were cooler than Classic Westerns and other Hollywood Classics steeped in moralism. (If moralism lived on, it was in anointing blacks, Jews, and later homos as new sacred icons.)

Even so, Vice didn’t take the place of Virtue. It was still understood that Vice should not be confused with Virtue. It was just that Vice was a lot cooler. It’s why the young kid wants to follow the egotistical libertine band in ALMOST FAMOUS. His mother might be right about the negative influence of Sex, Drugs, & Rock n Roll, but THAT happens to be central cultural mode of the kid and his friends(as is the case with the high schoolers in DAZED AND CONFUSED by Richard Linklater). There’s no greater failing among these boys and gals than being ‘square’ and ‘lame’. But even though Vice was prized as more fun-and-cool than Virtue, there was still a grudging respect for Virtue and Tradition. The Counterculture may have cooked up JESUS CHRIST SUPERSTAR, a Rock opera version of the Gospels, but Jesus was still the ‘superstar’ of Truth, not John Lennon or Mick Jagger.

4. Vice as the New Virtue and the Intolerance of True Virtue.

The Age we live in is truly sick and degenerate. Over-emphasis on Vice is bad enough. Still, a world of sinners conscious of their fallen-ness is still a world that knows the difference between virtue and vice. In such a world, degenerate gamblers in Las Vegas, at the very least, know they are indulging in vice. But imagine a world where gambling is seen not so much as regulated vice but the New Virtue, one that even provides ‘historical justice’ for American Indians and ‘rejuvenates’ local economies. Imagine a world where the supposedly conservative political party depends on donations from a casino mogul, someone like the loathsome Sheldon Adelson. Imagine a world where pornography isn’t merely tolerated as popular Vice but as the New Virtue of female empowerment? And maybe prostitution too(though pornography is essentially videotaped vicarious-prostitution). Imagine a world where homosexuality isn’t merely tolerated as a sexual deviance of those born with weird sexual predilections but something wondrous, miraculous, and rainbow-like, indeed something so glorious that children must be acculturated to adore and admire homos and trannies from the youngest possible age. Imagine a world where it’s perfectly wonderful for people to emotionally(and even intellectually) grow up backwards, becoming less mature and more infantile with each passing year. So, we often find women in their 30s and 40s with pink-or-green hair, tattoos, and piercings acting dumber and sillier than when they were 10 or 12. A world where people emerge from colleges looking, feeling, and acting more childish than when they entered. After all, PC infantilizes the mind. Imagine a world where women baring their breasts, buttocks, and vaginas in public is justified and championed on grounds of liberation, emancipation, and progress when it’s just mentally deranged women acting worse than apes.

Such is a world far worse than the Counterculture world of boomers, an experimental moment of excitement and uncertainty and transition. In the 60s and early 70s, there were many contending ‘schools’, and none of them had gained the power of Political Correctness. Also, much of the Vice unleashed by the 60s was defended as relatively harmless vice. The argument was that most people were not saints and even saints had flaws. So, just as utopia is impossible, so is virtutopia. Also, the idealized images of Americana, such as LEAVE IT TO BEAVER and FATHER KNOWS BEST, were TV fantasies and didn’t reflect the reality that was far darker and more complex. So, the idea was that people should develop a live-and-let-live way. Be more tolerant, even of vices and flaws in people.

But our world is radically different from the BAD-NEWS-BEARS culture of tolerance(and slovenliness) of the 70s. Ours is an era when so many people are convinced that Vice is the New Virtue. Having been inculcated thus by PC and Pop Culture, we live in a world where people believe in ‘gay marriage’ as a quasi-spiritual triumph and pretend that BLM garbage has moral value as the New Civil Rights Movement. At the very least, when black riots exploded in the 60s, even Liberals understood blacks had gone bonkers. Even as they continued to feel sympathy for blacks, they knew that those burning down cities weren’t just innocent babes. The Radical Chic infatuation that lent support to Black Panthers and other radical groups was seen as foolhardy by most Liberals, and the Democratic Party was deeply divided on the race issue. But fast forward to today, and BLM is a totally manufactured lie, a ‘Hate Hoax’ on a massive scale. And yet, the Mass Media, Academia, and the Government pretended as if it is some tremendous moral movement. (This is especially disingenuous since the reason for tougher policing in big cities was the globo-proggy-yuppie desire to revitalize urban areas by clamping down on black crime.)
As for Jewish Vice-as-Virtue, it is the queen bee of them all. Jews control the media and pushed the BLM narrative. Jews have also been most responsible for the elevation of Homomania as a neo-religion, a form of Satanic-Jewish-christianity or SJC. It was part of their design to destroy Christianity as the predominant cultural and moral value system of the West. To Jews, Christianity will forever mean "goyim stole our God thanks to renegade Jesus and Paul" and "goyim, armed with God and Jesus, feel more ‘evolved’ and righteous than us Jews." The New Testament says the Son of God was killed by Jews, and He was resurrected. This is why Jews at Google will NOT acknowledge Easter, but they will run theme after theme about homos, trannies, and the like. Queertianity or Satanic-Jewish-christianity(SJC) is owned and controlled by Jews, and that is why anyone who comes under its sway becomes the tools of Jews. This way, God comes to belong only to Jews whereas dumb goyim are led to worship the holy homo anus. Now, there are Jews who also sincerely believe in Homomania and don’t care about real religions, but the REAL REASON why so many rich and powerful Jews got behind Homomania was its likely effect on goyim, especially white Christian goyim. If those dumb goyim could be made to worship holy homo anus or Bruce Jenner’s penis-as-vagina more than God and Jesus, then they’ve been stripped of moral pride. After all, Homomania has no moral depth and relies solely on hype and hysteria. Remove all that Wall-Street-Las-Vegas-Hollywood-Silicon-Valley financing, and Homomania will collapse overnight because there is nothing there, nothing that is real or meaningful. It’s the delirious make-believe that what homos do with one another has equal biological or moral value as what men and women do in acts of Real Sex. Homomania would have us believe that homo fecal penetration is worthy of being associated with the rainbow and of serving as the basis for ‘marriage’. It is not about tolerance of homosexuals(and even trannies) but celebration, elevation, and deification of homos and trannies as holy angels. This is why proggy parents want their kids to be led by homos in Boy Scouts or spend time in kindergarten and pre-school with trannies. They believe their children will be blessed by 'angels'. This is why so many people feel better about themselves if they can claim to have a ‘gay’ friend(or a black or Jewish friend).

Since homos and trannies aren’t merely to be tolerated but sanctified, anyone who says NO to Homomania is deemed a heretic and to be destroyed. Thus, a decent, moral, and courageous baker who will not make a ‘gay wedding cake’ will be targeted, demeaned, dehumanized, fined, and bankrupted. Those who gleefully call for such a person’s destruction aren't secular libertarians motivated by ‘equal treatment under the law’ but rabid & virulent crazed neo-religious types whose faith is Homomania. For them, a decent and moral baker who won’t cave to the degeneracy of ‘gay marriage’ is a heretic, witch, and devilish monster who must be burned at the stake. Their foaming-at-the-mouth and lunatic rage cannot be explained in terms of legal matter or rational argument. They are true-believing fanatics who, being empty souls devoid of genuine morality and faith, have had their spiritual vacuum filled with degeneracy-fitted-with-angel-wings. Sick souls gravitate toward degeneracy, but even sick souls long for some kind of meaning and validation. So, nothing is more appealing to such people than vice-as-virtue. This way, the sick souls can wallow in vice and degeneracy while, at the same time, believing themselves to be morally and spiritually superior to those who refuse to come onboard and must therefore be stoned or burned at the stake in ritualized PC madness.
A world where Vice is more prevalent than Virtue is bad enough, but a world that mistakes Vice as New Virtue and wages war on Virtue as the New Vice is a truly demented one. It is the one we are living in because the world is controlled by the West that is under the power of EOJ or the Empire of Judea. We are living in a world where the Lie is the New Truth.

Imagine a game of 2 + 2. We all know that 2 + 2 = 4. An excessively virtuous world of 2 + 2 = 4 would force all people to adhere to the truth that 2 + 2 = 4... or else. Such a world would be virtuous but not very free. After all, even if 2 + 2 = 5 is false, why shouldn’t people have the freedom to say what is wrong? Shouldn’t freedom tolerate falsehood? Also, how can society move beyond 2 + 2 = 4 IF people are made to fear being wrong in their calculations. Progress in mathematics, like in everything else, came about through many mistakes, trial-and-error, and theorems that failed. If an order excessively insists on the truth of 2 + 2 = 4, people will fear being wrong, and that will make for a dull, fearful, and less experimental society. While many calculations other than 2 + 2 = 4 may be wrong, some might lead to new possibilities that arrive at greater formulas.
Now, imagine a society that tolerates a mistake like 2 + 2 = 5. The calculation is plainly wrong, but a free society should tolerate mistakes and even falsehoods AS LONG AS those with the truth can rebut and correct the lies and delusions. So, a world where people can say 2 + 2 = 5, 2 + 2 = 10, 2 + 2 = 100, 2 + 2 = 900, and etc. is indeed a free society. It would still maintain the truth of 2 + 2 = 4, but it would allow for people to make mistakes or say something ludicrous for the sake of freedom. So, if you want to say 2 + 2 = 1,000,000, so be it. It’d be fantastical, but fantasy can be fun... like James Bond falling out of an airplane but somehow managing to land safely on a yacht with a woman in a bikini.

But then, imagine a world that has come to accept 2 + 2 = 5 as a Holy Formula. It cannot be challenged or questioned because anyone who does so shall be denounced and/or destroyed as a five-o-phobe, a ‘hateful’ 4-ist, or ‘intolerant’ 4-centrist. So, even people who know that 2 + 2 = 4 dare not voice their views and remain mum while the powers-that-be in media, academia, entertainment, and government instill so many minds that 2 + 2 = 5 = rainbow = happy faces = coolness = holiness. This is truly a kind of hell. Not only has falsehood been tolerated but elevated to the status of New Holy Truth. Since the sacred hates the profane, the New Sacred Formula of 2 + 2 = 5 cannot tolerate the Formula of 2 + 2 = 4 that, as long as it is allowed to be muttered, could challenge and discredit the falsehood of 2 + 2 = 5.

Inversion of Prerogatives in Our Crazy World says Your Nation Belongs to Foreigners

Now, what's the point of having your own nation? To have a homeland for your people, right? If you're not going to own and defend it as such, why have a nation at all?
Indeed, why not just abandon your identity and history? Why not abandon your people's special right to the territory? And why not dissolve borders so that any number of peoples can move in and out, like animals roam the wild? If you believe that any number of people should move in and out of any place, there is no need for nations. We might as well act like animals that migrate freely from place to place. All of us might as well become like Gypsies and surrender all sense of roots.
What about Rule of Law? I have no idea how that would work out. If a nation cannot even defend its borders and decide who enters and exits, how can it enforce any kind of rule of law? And if all the world should welcome endless wanderers, nomads, and invaders who come with their own cultural norms, who's to say one Rule of Law is better than another kind? After all, Rule of Law depends on the law itself. In the Current West, the Rule of Laws says you will be financially destroyed if you refuse to bake a cake for 'gay wedding'. And Rule of Law can be used against Rule of Law. In some states, illegals who have violated American laws are given protection under the Rule of Law that favors those who break laws over those who want to defend them. Rule of Law in California and many other states protect illegals and prosecute those who take actions against the invaders. So, what is Rule of Law in a world of Broken Borders?
Indeed, this will be the big question in Europe as Muslim communities demand their own sets of laws and as African communities insist on their tribal customs and norms.
Already, Jews are virtually above-the-law in many parts of the West. Rule of Law can only be enforced within a well-defined nation with shared values and habits. But in a world where nationalism is condemned as passe and where peoples of different cultures, manners, and habits move in and out of communities that they lay to waste, what chance is there for Rule of Law?

Having a nation is like having a house. A nation didn’t just fall from the sky or grow from the ground. It had to be secured, built, defended, built some more, defended some more, consolidated, claimed, and maintained. Likewise, a house has to be built or bought. It doesn’t come into existence just out of the blue. Now, what is the purpose of having a home? To own it as one’s property. To defend it from others, especially trespassers and marauders. Worst thing that can happen to a property is for others to trespass and take it. Now, if you intend to allow just about any human or creature to move in and out of your house, why did you build or buy the house in the first place? Why did you go through all that trouble just to let OTHERS to occupy and tear it apart?
Same thing goes for a nation. Why did your people build that nation if you’re not going to defend it and own it for posterity? Why go through all the trouble of securing the land, settling the land, developing the land, building institutions, enacting laws, and growing the economy IF your final purpose is to just let others have it? If you’re going to give it all away, why did your people go through so much struggle, even great wars, to claim and defend the land? If you think OTHERS should have it, then your people should not have bothered to pour so much blood, sweat, and tears into transforming the land into a nation.
Imagine there is a wasteland that most peoples show no interest in. Suppose YOUR PEOPLE enter into the land, cut down trees, till the soil, and do the heavy-lifting to turn the land into an oasis. ALL OF A SUDDEN, other peoples now want a part of it because it's nice. (It's like people who neglected Noah's advice to build arks of their own trying to climb into the Ark when the rain began to fall.) Should you let them take it? But why did YOUR PEOPLE build up the land just to let others have it? If you think others should have the land, then your people should not have bothered to build anything on it. Let others do the hard work to develop the land. Non-white peoples had no interest in exploring, discovering, conquering, and developing the New World. They didn't even have the vision or commitment to develop their own lands that, even today, remain poor and backward(despite abundance of land and natural resources). But now that they realize that white people have nice nations, they want to claim and take for themselves what was made by whites.

Also, if any people have the ‘right’ to trespass into your nation and take over, do YOUR PEOPLE also have the right to just mass-invade any nation and take over? So, 50 million Africans have the ‘right’ to take over Italy, and 50 million Italians have the ‘right’ to move to Japan and take over... if they feel like it? And the invaders and trespassers have the prerogative and the ‘right’ over the natives with deep roots in the land? Is patriotism the biggest crime in the globalist era? Doesn’t anyone realize that losing a nation is much worse than losing a house? If you lose your house, you can build another one. But if you lose your nation, your people have no homeland to call their own. And it’s very difficult to get it back. Good luck to Hawaiians taking back Hawaii. Good luck to Palestinians getting back Palestine. Good luck to Serbians getting Kosovo back. Good luck to Greeks or Christendom getting Constantinople(now Istanbul) back. It was by a miracle that Jews got Zion back, and it was very messy and bloody, and the problem continues to this day. Kurds continue to suffer because they don’t have a nation to call their own and happen to be scattered among several nations, all of which are hostile to them.
It’s bad business to lose a house, but another house can always be built or bought. But lose your nation, and good luck about getting it back. Jews reclaiming the Holy Land was the exception that proved the rule. Also, a homeland has much greater meaning than a home. Individuals don’t live forever. A man may own a great mansion, but he will be six feet underground after several decades on earth. And the mansion will pass to some other people. But a nation can exist indefinitely as the homeland of a people. Most of the pioneers of Israel are now dead, but their children and their children’s children ad infinitum hope to keep the land for the Jews as long as mankind survives.

Now, some argue that the newcomers will just become part of the national community, but this is wishful thinking. Usually, minorities remain cooperative and respectful ONLY WHEN they’re small in number and faced with a confident overwhelming majority that also commands patriotic elite power. But when the native majority acts all apologetic & wussy and says that their nation belongs more to foreigners than to themselves, the minorities will just call on more of their kind to come invading. And as their numbers continue to swell, they will begin to smell the blood of a dying nation. They will sense they can take over and feed off it. Scavengers and leeches don’t respect weakness in the host.
But then, even if newcomers came with respect and kindness, too many of them will alter the character of the nation because a people are MORE than merely a name. Germans are more than ‘Germans’. It’s like, if you have a daughter named Sue, she is more than ‘Sue’. Even if her name was changed to Jill, she would still be your daughter. But if someone who is not your daughter changes her name to ‘Sue’ and pretends to be your daughter, she is not your daughter despite having the name ‘Sue’ and wearing similar dress as your daughter. But the West is now suffering from the Changeling Syndrome. So, Germans fool themselves that if they take in millions upon millions of Muslims and Africans and pretend that they are ‘Germans’ or ‘New Germans’, then Germany will remain Germany because all the newcomers are ‘Germans’ too. Right, and imitation crab meat is real crab meat. And cats are dogs if you call them ‘dogs’ and teach them to play fetch, which is exceedingly hard to do.

How did this Inversion of Prerogatives happen? How did people(especially whites) come to believe that OTHERS have ‘first dibs’ or primary claim on what had been theirs rightfully and ‘fightfully’(as they’d ancestors had fought to claim it)? Imagine if someone did so much to build a home but then put up a sign that said, "claim my house". Why did he go through the trouble of building a house to let others have it and push him out? That would be retarded. Or, suppose a house was built long ago by your ancestors and handed down generation after generation as special place for your family lineage. Suppose that house is meant to be more than a place of residence; it’s meant to be a place of remembrance. Then, why would you allow a bunch of marauders and squatters to trespass and tear the place apart?

In a way, the problem began with the discovery of the New World. While most parts of the Old World were settled, the New World nations came into being with conquest, settlement, colonization, immigration, and rise of new identities. (The New World template of constant migration and mobility was turned into a universal 'human right'. So, even the EU is to be seen as The Other America, a 'union of immigrants' that must take in endless 'huddled masses' from Africa and the Middle East. This template is now also being applied to East Asia as The West constantly applies pressure on Japan to welcome Diversity and Inclusion-Invasion. According to Western PC, it should be a 'human right' for millions of foreigners to move to Japan and become 'New Japanese' and take over entire communities.)
The trajectory of invasion and expansion couldn’t be helped in the New World as most of it was either unpopulated or underpopulated(by standards of other civilizations, not least due to the deaths of tens of millions as the result of lack of immunity to Old World diseases). But the New World was not discovered and founded by the world but by specific populations. Spanish and Portuguese conquered most of what came to be Latin America. And Anglos and the French to a lesser extent conquered most of North America(minus Mexico). And these peoples created their new orders as racial, ethnic, and cultural extensions of the worlds they knew back home. So, Anglo-American preferred Anglo immigrants and settlers. When the US needed More People, it preferred those who were racially and ethnically closest to Anglos: Irish, Dutch, Germans, and Nordics. As they were virtually same as Anglos in appearance and temperament(though Irish could be rough at times due to the James Cagney gene), they could easily be assimilated into Anglo-America. Also, as fellow Christians, they worshiped the same God and symbols.

The US was not founded as a World-Nation for the simple reason that the World didn’t discover and develop it. A specific population of Anglos and Northern Europeans did, just like a specific population of Spanish and Portuguese came to set the cultural template for Latin America. Their biggest mistake was bringing over all those Sub-Saharan West African blacks who were more muscular and more aggressive than the white race. The race problem between whites and blacks is testament to the Danger of Diversity or DOD. To maintain order among tougher and more aggressive blacks, whites sometimes had to use ugly and cruel violence. And once blacks got their freedom, they began to prey on whites physically, materially, and sexually as the weaker ‘wussy’ race. Another threat came from the Chinese IF they were to be ‘welcomed’ in huge numbers.
In the past few decades, we’ve seen what virtual Open Borders(or Broken Borders) can do to a place. California, which had been overwhelmingly white, is now poised to have more Mexicans than whites. And along with Asians(craven teachers’ pets of Jews and homos), whites are being squeezed out. Worse, remaining whites in California have been mentally colonized by Jews to hate their own race and to welcome the flood. Based on recent events, imagine what would have happened if the US had allowed Open Borders to Chinese immigration-invasion in the late 19th century. China, with a huge poverty-stricken population, would have taken over California and much of the West like Mexicans are doing today. Or look at China itself. As Tibetans don’t have the means to say NO to Chinese migration-invasion, Tibet itself is poised to be majority Han-Chinese if it isn’t already.

Immigration is a tool that can work for or against your people. For most of the 19th century and even 20th century, white people used immigration to boost white presence and power in America. Immigration favored white folks. Immigration is never generic. It depends on who/whom. Israel was created by immigration but of Jews Only. Suppose Israel was founded with color-blind immigration. It never would have become a Homeland for Jews. Suppose Chinese government were to allow Asian-Indians to move into Tibet. In time, Indians instead of Chinese could dominate the place. There’s a huge difference between the Russian government encouraging Russian ethnics to settle Siberia and allowing Chinese to migrate there. If the latter, the Chinese will effectively own much of Siberia. So, when people say the US is a Nation of Immigrants, it’s meaningless because it pretends that immigration is generic. In fact, the kind of immigration that formed the foundation and basis for America was genetic than generic. Back in the 19th century, Emma Lazarus’ poem was not a threat to the US because it was understood, even by Lazarus herself, that immigration would favor European whites(of whom Jews were a part). Race-ism was great for America. It made America and defined America. Without Race-ism, the US wouldn't have developed as an extension of European Civilization. Suppose upon the establishment of the US, the Founding Fathers decided to call on peoples ALL OVER THE WORLD to pour into the New Land. Anglos and whites would soon have been turned into a minority outnumbered by Muslims, Africans, Asians, Hindus, and etc with their own norms, customs, and values. And without race-ism, whites would have had no justification to replace red savages and their primitive cultures with far more advanced Western ones. (Ism means belief, and Race-ism means belief in the reality of race & differences and/or the need for racial identity and consciousness. ‘Racism’ has been willfully mis-defined by Jews to mean irrational or knee-jerk racial hatred, chauvinism, and supremacism.) Whites who settled America were aware of the importance of race. If whites were to build a modern and progressive(as opposed to the degenerate ‘progressivism’ of today) nation, they had to be racially aware. Whites had to make a distinction between themselves and American Indians whose world was savage and primitive. The biggest mistake was bringing blacks over as slaves. This is regarded as a ‘racist’ crime’, but it was really a criminal negligence of true race-ism. If whites had been truly, rationally, and sanely race-ist back then, they would have thought, "Maybe it’s not a good idea to bring over all those blacks. Just look at their muscles. That mountain-sized Negro looks like he can crush my head like a zit. And look at those black women whose main expression is shaking their booties and acting like nappy-headed ho’s. And look at the dongs on them fellers. Not only will stronger blacks whup our ass but turn our women into jungle-fevered whores who go with Negro men as the superior race and look down on us as a bunch of cucky-wucks. So, let’s NOT bring over the ‘groids’ as slaves. Slavery is cruel and unpleasant and will besmirch our reputation, which is bad enough, but furthermore, there is no guarantee that slavery will last forever. Once freed, them ‘groids’ will kick our butts in sports, turn young people wild with jiggity music, reduce us to a bunch of dweeby cucky-wucks, and colonize the wombs of interracist white women who get to thinking like Rachel Dolezal." Now, that is some Core Race-ist thought, and if white people had accepted such Race-ism, they never would have brought over those Sub-Saharan West African Americans. At most, they might have brought over some Pygmies who, being small and short, could only have looked up to white folks like Arnold of DIFF’RENT STROKES and whined, "What you talkin’ about, white man?" This is why we need proper Race-ism that acknowledges and understands racial differences. Integration between whites and blacks leads to loss of white manhood and ACOWW(Afro-Colonization of White Wombs) because black men are more muscular, louder, funkier, and generally got bigger dongs. And the nature of women is to get sexually excited about ‘bad boys’ who act tough. This is ever more so in a culture where the main modes of expression is Rap thuggery and booty-chuggery. The main problem with blacks was not slavery; after all, black Africa had slavery for 10,000 yrs. It was the fact that the races are not the same. If whites had enslaved any other people, the dynamics would have been totally different. If Anglo-whites had enslaved white Russians, former masters and former slaves would have merged into a common race after Emancipation. After all, the end of Serfdom in Russia led to a unified single people. In contrast, why did Caste divisions last so long in India? Because there was a racial element to the caste system from the master caste to the middle caste to the slave caste to the untouchable caste. Even so, even the racial-caste system wasn't so bad in India because the darker peoples there are NOT bigger, stronger, and more aggressive than lighter-skinned upper-caste folks.

Europeans fail to understand this. They think their Africans won’t turn out like Black Americans because Europeans don’t have the ‘original sin’ of slavery. Granted, some European nations did take part in the slave trade, but Swedes and Germans didn’t. And the French less so than Anglos and Spanish/Portuguese, not least because the French eventually lost out in the New World to Anglos. So, Europeans think their African arrivals will turn out so much better than black Americans. But the end result will be the same because the problem in the US between whites and blacks was racial than historical. Europe can take in millions of FREE Negroes and treat them well, but the Negroes there will end up like Negroes in the US. Why? It’s in their oogity-boogity genes to act wild and crazy. In Africa, they drive hippos crazy, and in Europe they will drive white folks crazy. Also, their generally lower intelligence will mean they will leech off whites forever. Furthermore, their egomaniacal personality makes them less reflective and self-critical. Blacks have poor grasp of modern concepts of property, ownership, contracts, and manners. Blacks think like predators. When lions, hyenas, or bears see something they want, they try to grab it for themselves. Lions don’t think, "Hmm, those hyenas are eating that Zebra. I think it belongs to them, and we should bring down our own zebra." No, lions just think, "Sheeeeiiit, let’s take the eats from the hyena mofos." And if hyenas see a lone cheetah eating a gazelle, they don’t think, "You know, I’ll bet that cheetah tried so hard to bring down that prey. It’s his and let’s get our own grubs." No, the hyenas think, "Sheeeeeeiiit, a free meal! Let’s drive that punkass cheetah away and take his meat." Negroes feel the same way. Their sense of property and ownership is based on "Gots to have me". That’s what Rap is all about. It’s about the thuggery of taking stuff just because you want it. This is why blacks are champion robbers and rapists. Indeed, blacks rape even white women who put out to them. So, when white co-eds with jungle fever put out to blacks, blacks still have to rape them by saying to their brothas, "Here’s some free white pussy for us all, sheeeeeiiit." Blacks don’t hanker for no little white mouse like the mountain-sized Negro does in GREEN MILE. They’s want white wealth, white women, white lands, white everything. They think everything white exists to be taken by them. Blacks even feel that white history should be owned by them. So, white historical characters should be turned into ‘groids’ and blackamoors.

Therefore, people need to stop blaming ‘racism’ for the black problem in America and increasingly in Europe. The problem has been due to the lack of True Race-ism. If white folks had acknowledged the truthfulness of True Race-ism, they never would have brought over all those blacks to the New World.

Unfortunately, whites were motivated by Christianity, Commercialism, and Chauvinism. One part of whites felt that they were civilizing black savages into good decent Christians. By this logic, slavery was a Leviathanic process whereby blacks would go from wild savages to good Christian folks, whereupon they would be freed. But for such process to work, slavery would have had to last over a 1000 yrs with wild and dangerous blacks being weeded out of the gene pool. It’s like it took some time to domesticate wild bulls into livestock. It took some time to turn wolves into dogs. It took some time to turn wild boars into the farm pig. But blacks were under slavery for only a couple of centuries. Also, whites stupidly bred blacks to be extra-strong to carry all them cotton. So, in some cases, white made the stronger race even stronger and ended up like guys like Sonny Liston and Mike Tyson(who looks more demented than even African Negroes).
'Racism' violated True Race-ism. Abraham Lincoln was a True Race-ist insofar as he understood the black threat. This is why he wanted the blacks freed and sent back to Africa. He had the same fears as the visionary prophet D.W. Griffith of THE BIRTH OF A NATION who feared something closer to BIRTH OF THE CONQUEST OF THE PLANET OF THE APES. But True Race-ism was overlooked by those with short-term commercial interests or Christian folly that Negroes could become nice meek humble Uncle-Tom-like Christians when, in fact, the Negro soul is too wild and rough to understand the true meaning of higher spirituality. Jesus founded His religion by silently meditating for 40 days. A Negro has difficulty sitting still for 4 minutes. His jiggity oogity-boogity nature turned even Christianity into a butt-shaking foot-tapping pandemonium. If Negroes take up Buddhism, they’ll turn Nirvana into something you attain by hollering and ‘twerking’.
Other than commercial greed and Christian folly(of civilizing blacks into nice Uncle Toms), there was white chauvinism of False Race-ism, aka ‘racism’. Unlike True Race-ism that honestly explores and notices racial differences, False Race-ism or ‘racism’ led to white chauvinism and denial of reality. White ‘racists’ were full of themselves as the toughest and manliest fellers in the world. They believed in the ‘great white hope’ who would finally whup the Negroes and show the world who’s the real King of the Hill. ‘Racism’ stupidly boosted white male pride when white men should have been in alarmist mode(like honest D.W. Griffith of THE BIRTH OF A NATION) and feared the ghastly Negro. Of course, on some level, white men did fear the Negro as a threat. After all, Jack Johnson whupped all those white guys, and later, Joe Louis whupped tons of white guys, and Muhammad Ali and other blacks dominated boxing. And blacks took over basketball and football. And blacks in schools beat up so many whites. But white ‘racists’ were too filled with bogus chauvinism to come to terms with the black threat and admit their legitimate fears. Whites had been winning so much for so long against so much of the world that it seemed white superiority was a birthright. But in fact, whites were superior only in certain things while inferior in other things. In raw struggle of animal drives, white men were bound to lose to the tougher Negro men. But too many whites didn’t admit to their fears(lest they come across as ‘scared’ and ‘wimpy’) and exaggerated their manhood by calling blacks ‘niggers’ and acting nasty like Southerners opposed to Segregation. Their anti-integrationist stance would have been much more effective if, in the spirit of True Race-ism, they had laid out why blacks, being more muscular-more-aggressive-and-bigger-donged, pose an existential and ‘sexistential’ threat to the white race. But nope, they just huffed and puffed as tough white guys and acted like thugs in front of TV cameras while blacks were pretending to be marching for ‘peace’ when they were really thinking, "You honkey mofos gonna get your ass whupped once the laws be changed cuz we just pretendin’ to be for MLK’s message of peace as Trojan Horse trick and shit." Yep, the Black Rampage was unleashed on America with the passage of Civil Rights Bill.

Anyway, the point is immigration is never generic. It is about who/whom. A nation has something to gain by letting in more of their own kind. So, when Germany took in millions of Ost-Germans after WWII, Germany just became MORE German. And when Polish ethnics were pushed into Poland from Western Ukraine(which used to be part of Poland from 1918 to 1939), Poland just became more Polish. Granted, even migration of the same kind of people can be stressful and challenging. The sudden rush of millions of Ost-Germans into Germany after WWII led to a humanitarian disaster. And the rush of many Mainland Chinese fleeing Maoism into Hong Kong led to severe socio-economic stress. Even so, problems eventually faded because Ost-Germans were fellow Germans, and all those Mainland Chinese, once they found their footing in Hong Kong, were just fellow Chinese. But the millions of New Germans(from Africa and Middle East) rushing into Germany today will alter the character of the nation. And imagine if a million Hindus than Chinese had rushed into Hong Kong. There would be big tensions between Chinese and Hindus, even if they’re regarded as ‘New Chinese’. Why did Hong Kong return to China? Because of history, ethnos, and culture. If China had the right to reclaim Hong Kong(even though Brits played a key role in having built it) because it was part of Chinese territory and populated by Chinese, why don’t the native folks of Britain have a right of claim to their ancestral homeland? Chinese don’t think, "The rest of the world has first dibs on Hong Kong and any other part of China." So, why do the Brits, French, Germans, Swedes, and etc. feel that OTHERS have greater claim to their own nations? How did such Inversion of Prerogatives happen?

Because of the Inversion of Prerogatives, we now believe that white minds belong to Jews to mold, white wombs belong to black men to impregnate, white wealth exist for non-whites to filch, and white lands exist for immigrant-invaders or immi-vaders to colonize and takeover. As for whites, they must say YES to the surrender of their claims. If they say NO, they are demeaned as ‘racist’, ‘xenophobic’, ‘exclusionary’, ‘Islamphobic’, and ‘antisemitic’. Now, if whites were in other lands lording over others, I can understand why the natives would complain and demand that whites get lost and return to their own lands. But now, even whites in their own nations are told that they don’t own their own minds, womenfolk, wealth, and land. Not even history as White History is being darkened with non-whites(especially blacks) cast in roles of white historical characters. And so many whites serve as cucks and collaborators because they’ve been raised fro cradle to obey Jews, worship homos, revere Negroes, celebrate Diversity(of Immi-vasion and replacist demographics), and hate white patriots who say NO to their own racial demise.
Part of the reason is Western elites are now worthless cuck-collaborators of Judea. But another reason is globalism has inflated Western elitist ego with dreams of neo-imperialism. So, French, British, and German leaders no longer see themselves merely as leaders of their own respective nations but of the World. Theresa May the hideous harridan talks like she is ruler of all humanity than of her British kinfolk. Angela Merkel sees herself as big-titty dairy cow to people all over the world. And the French elites still dream that France will become like a Mini-World with all the immi-vaders turning into New Frenchmen who appreciate French culture when, in fact, most Newcomers assimilate to globo-mondo-trash culture emanating from Hollywood and Rap music industry. While millions of Black Africans flock to Europe to demand "Where the white women at?" and while millions of white women yell out, "I’m here with jungle fever, you big-donged Negro", mentally castrated white males honk out, "I’m a cuck! I’m a cuck!" Indeed, among too many white males, the only warrior passion they can muster is against their own race. So, while Antifa white males honk, "I’m a cuck!" before the Negro and the Jew, they get murderously violent against white patriots who refuse to honk, "I’m a cuck!"

It’s not enough to own something. One must feel one has righteous claim over what he owns. And this is determined by control of the Narrative. It’s like it’s not enough to possess a house. You must back it up with rightful and/or righteous claim. Without the claim, one’s possession of the house becomes iffy and questionable. One is put on the defensive against would-be invaders. It’s the Claim Game. Before Jews could gain Palestine, they had to claim it with their own righteous Narrative about how the land really belongs to Jews due to history. And after WWII, Jews added the Shoah Clause to the claim, i.e. because of what happened in WWII, the West is morally obligated to back Jewish claim on Palestine. If Jews had just tried to take Palestine by brute force, they might have succeeded but would have had no moral claim to back up their ownership. The problem with whites in South Africa is they failed to come up with a useful claim on the land, made much worse by allowing blacks to become majority in the nation.

The US was founded with a specific and special claim made by Anglo-Americans and other Europeans. But Jews resented the special role of White Christianity in claiming and owning America. Jews wanted to own it for themselves. But because they didn’t have the numbers with which to beat out white gentiles — in contrast, Jews did have the numbers to squeeze out Arabs in Palestine — , Jews sought to subvert and nullify the White Christian claim by pushing for mass non-white immi-vasion. America has been a Nation of European Immigrants, but Jews took out the ‘European’ and just made it a nation of Generic Immigration from all over the world. By pushing this Diversity Narrative, Jews terminated the special white claim to America... and that meant that Jews would be the defacto rulers and owners of America. Why would that be if the World comes barging in? Wouldn’t Jews lose out along with White gentiles? No, because Jews control the upper echelons and elite level of America. With control of Wall Street, Silicon Valley, Las Vegas, Real Estate, Hollywood, Big Media, Ivy Leagues, and much else, Jews would be the Hyper-Elite overlord class over Diversity of Gentiles who can be manipulated and controlled by machinations of Divide-and-Rule.

This is why it was so important for Jews to push Homomania as well. That too is an Inversion of Prerogatives. We know what real sex is. We know that all human life was created by sexual union of men and women. So, marriage and family are something that belong to straight and normal people. Not a single life was ever created by Homo fecal penetration or Lesbian poon-grinding. Marriage developed as a Bio-Moral institution. It understood the way of biology — the sex drive and creation of new life by reproductive process of men and women — and the way of morality — the need for a man and woman to commit to one another to take care of the very lives they produce — , and as such, it was the most important institution in human history. Now, because most people are straight men and straight women, True Marriage has valued the majority population over the homo(and tranny) minority of sexual deviants. Straight people not only got married but had a special claim on and ownership of marriage. This affirmed the power of the majority and normality. Jews figured that such a ‘majoritarian’ institution undermines minority ambitions. If a society of mostly straight men and women should be ruled by them and guided by their needs, the corollary is a mostly gentile society should be ruled by gentiles in service of gentile interests and needs... but that would undermine Jewish supremacist claim on gentile societies. So, Jews pushed the LGBTQ Inversion of Prerogatives that fooled so many PC-addled and Pop-culture-addicted dummies into believing that straight and normal people have no special claim on Marriage. Instead, it belongs just as much or even more so to Homos and trannies. Thanks to Jew-run media and Jew-run government, there is now more fanfare for homos getting ‘married’ even though it’s about guys committing to bugger each other for life.

But such degeneracy has been so sensationalized and blessed by the Jew-run media and entertainment that many vapid, shallow, and superficial straight people now get ecstatic at any manifestations of Homomania, which is now essentially a neo-religion for globalized, deracinated, and desexualized hedonist-morons.

And this lunacy has also bled into the idea of womanhood. We sane people know what real women are. They are the fairer sex, have boobs and pooters(or cooters), and can give birth. Some men used to dress up as women, but we knew they were men as fake women. But now, the Power tells us that womanhood is ‘fluid’. So, if some guy with dick and balls puts on a wig, wiggles his ass, dons a dress, and claim to be a ‘woman’, we better admit he’s a woman. He can get a fake ‘vagina’ through Frankenstein surgery OR keep his dick and balls. The thing is the Inversion of Prerogatives says he is a ‘woman’ and we better acknowledge him as one... or else we are ‘transphobic’ and to be fined for big bucks by cities like New York.

So, just like native Anglos no longer own UK and native French no longer own France, real women no longer own womanhood. The new prerogative for Brits and French is to defer to Immi-invaders and roll out the red carpet to them as having more claim to the land than the existing inhabitants with deep roots of ancestry and history. Because the core meaning of UK and France has been re-coded to define them as ‘nations of immigrants’ and worshipers-of-Diversity, the mass-invaders(as ‘immigrants’ and ‘people of diversity’) now have greater claim to nations like UK and France than the native folks do.
And if tranny men want to claim ‘womanhood’, the New Feminism(totally controlled by Jewish globalists) says women should welcome them as ‘sisters’. So, the Prerogative of Womanhood is no longer to define woman-ness according to biological truth but to the social construct of PC. (Ironically, LGBTQ that says homosexuality and tranns-genderism are biologically fixed, immutable, and unalterable says sex is just a social construct, and there is no fixed ‘man’ or ‘woman’.) So, the vast majority of women must surrender their prerogative of Womanhood to a tiny minority of tranny freaks who claim to own womanhood just as much as real women do. But because virtue-vanity in the prog community is invested in being ‘more evolved’ and ahead-of-the-curve in ideological fashions, so many people unthinkingly go along due to hype and hysteria or out of fear and intimidation, as those who don’t comply are identified and attacked by purity-spiralers.

But then, all the West, despite being majority white Christian — even nearly homogeneously White Christian in places like Hungary and Poland — has surrendered to the Inversion of Prerogatives whereby the prevailing idea is that Jewish & Zionist interests must always take precedence over White Christian/Gentile ones. Indeed, that was the beginning of the end. When white gentile majorities began to defer to Jews and treat them like a Holy People whose identity, interests, and narrative must take precedence over white gentile majority ones, Jews gained tremendous pride, prestige, and power to reprogram the core-coding of the West. The result was Inverted Prerogatives whereupon whites, even in their own ancestral lands, must surrender their title and claim to All the World that the Jewish horsemen use as cattle to stampede over the White West. If white people don’t want to be overrun by the never-ending stampede, they must circle the wagons and, better yet, build fences to keep the cows out.

If Western folks think they can appease Jews and the Invaders by being nice to the ones who have already invaded, they need to think again. Such wussy meekness and weakness emboldens Jews and invaders to push for yet MORE STAMPEDE. If squirrels invade your house, it won’t do to treat the ones-already-inside nicely. Squirrels on the outside will not think, "Humans are being nice to squirrels in the house. Let’s respect them and not invade further." No, when squirrels on the outside see that squirrels-inside-the-house are getting free food and other goodies, they will invade too and more and more will come. It’s just the Law of Organisms. Humans are organisms and naturally flock to where the goodies are. If white nations were dirt poor, corrupt, and messy and IF non-white nations were rich and overflowing with goodies, white organisms will want to move to non-white places. When people heard of gold in the West, there was the Gold Rush. When Africans and Muslims hear that Europe has Broken Borders through which millions can pass through and gain access to goodies, the Euro-Rush is on big time.

It is time to Re-invert the Prerogatives. Not only must the stampede must be stopped but those who’ve invaded the West must be kicked out and returned to their own homelands. If they resist, they must be accused of being ‘racist’ and ‘white preferist’. After all, why do these non-whites not want to live with their own kind? Do they hate their own people and culture? Why do they prefer to live under and with whites? Isn’t their preference for whiteness a form of ‘white preferism’? The invaders must be liberated from ‘white preferism’ and made to re-appreciate their own peoples and cultures. They must be sent back.

And there must be reckoning with Jews who messed with the Narrative and re-coded the West to invert the prerogatives. Something must be done with Jewish Power. Whatever happens, there must be stringent laws that prevent Jews from corrupting and sabotaging the Core Survival Code of any white nation.