How the Rules of Elite Selection Determine the Future of Civilization — Current Elite Selection in the US has invariably led to White Cowards serving Jewish Bullies

Philip Giraldi asks why Why Always Israel? Only One Country Matters to Congress and the Media - https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2021/02/04/why-always-israel-only-one-country-matters-to-congress-and-the-media/

Why always Israel? It is the inevitable consequence of the dynamics of Elite Selection in the past several decades. The masses do the work and pay taxes, but a tiny group of elites makes all the decisions. So, the means by which the elites are chosen is crucial to the direction of a country or civilization. This is as obvious as day is bright and night is dark, but almost no one has been paying attention to the dire outcomes of Elite Selection along Jewish bias and demands.

In the past, the US government and elite institutions were open to both pro-white whites and anti-white whites. So, whites at the elite level were represented by both proud(as well as arrogant) whites and self-critical(as well as self-loathing) whites. Also, when Wasps ran things, the US government and elite institutions were open to pro-Jewish Jews and anti-Jewish Jews. So, Jews at elite levels were represented by both proud Jews and self-critical Jews. Jews who were critical of Zionism could enter government or gain position. Jews who rejected Judaism as outdated and chose assimilation into Anglo-Americanism were also welcome. Jews who embraced universalism over tribalism could also rise high.

So, back then, the US elite domains had both proud whites and self-doubting whites, both proud Jews and self-critical Jews. Of course, the Jewish Community was less divided than the white community(due to reasons of culture, history, and circumstance), but you didn’t have to be a nasty ultra-Zionist or hyper-proud vicious Jew to make it to the top.

But over the years, as a certain type of Jews gained the most power(and as certain chutzpahistic traits came to the fore with the pride/arrogance of success) , Jewish Power increasingly rigged the rules of Elite Selection. Increasingly, proud whites were banned and only sappy or cucky whites were approved for elite promotion. Also, self-critical Jews were increasingly rejected in favor of brazen, aggressive, tribal, and supremacist Jews(ironically made worse by GOP’s indulgence of the especially nasty Neocons who came to influence Liberal Jews as well — by welcoming nasty Neocons into the GOP, American Conservatives had hoped to use 'our Jews' against the so-called Liberal Jews, but the Neocons only weakened goy conservatism from within and emboldened Liberal Zionists to be even more assertive in their tribalism).

So, what happened after several decades of choosing white elites for their wimpery and cuckiness while choosing Jews for their supremacism, arrogance, nastiness, and tribalism?
We ended up with a scenario where the new white elites surrender white identity and interests to serve Jewish identity and interests that are insisted upon by nasty Jews.

How different things might have been if whites and Jews with differing outlooks and varying attitudes had been allowed to rise up the ladder. There would have been a more balanced set of agendas and interests. But, especially beginning in the 1960s, a white with elite prospects had to excoriate white identity and interests whereas a Jew with elite ambitions had to prioritize Jewish identity and interests uber alles.

The Rules of Elite Selections go a long way to determine the future of any group of humanity. One of the key questions as to why a civilization fell behind or apart can be gleaned from its dynamics of Elite Selection. Consider the Ottoman Turks and Traditional Confucian China. Elites in the Ottoman Empire were not chosen on merits, much as in the Byzantine Empire, and it meant a slow and sure death. Chinese did have a meritorious system that ultimately proved to be meretricious because of the emphasis on useless ‘eight-legged essays’, status posturing, and pomposity. And while it’s true communism was a bad economic system, things were made worse in the Soviet Union was its policies of Elite Selection that rewarded reliable flunkies without guts or vision. Notwithstanding the stultifying effects of black-biased Affirmative Action and Political Correctness run amok, it's been said elite selection is more meritocratic than ever in the West, but even if true, ability alone doesn't make a civilization. Many Jews are smart and capable but arrogant, nasty, contemptuous, and hypocritical, qualities that degrade the elite world. And while many bright whites do make it to the top, what good is their intelligence if they don't have the courage/character to speak truth against obvious corruption of Jews, vain fantasies of homos, and pathological lies of blacks?

US really lucked out for a long time because it had a sterling cast of characters(the Founding Fathers) as the original elites, and despite the corruptions and compromises, the first foundation served America well. But increasingly, as the nastiest among Jews gained prominence, the only qualities approved for whites were cravenness & obeisance while the obligatory quality among Jews was nastiness and viciousness. Nasty Jews refound America. The ‘Refoundation’ went much further than the Reconstruction in the South. From Founding Fathers to Refounding Reprobates.

Given the current rules of Elite Selection, someone like Glenn Greenwald will not be hired by New York Times or Washington Post. Someone like Norman Finkelstein will never work at an Ivy League university. As Jews, they are far too conscientious. And proud white men(relatively speaking) like Pat Buchanan are nowhere to be found in the GOP or ‘conservative establishment’. Heritage Foundation dropped Jason Richwine like a hot potato. National Review severed ties to John Derbyshire. Some might laud the changes in white attitudes as admirable in their conscientiousness and willingness to atone for history, but 'white guilt' has nothing to do with real conscience that arises from within. Rather, 'white guilt' is essentially afraid of and servile to external pressure, especially from Jews(who control the blacks and homos). It's similar to 'dog guilt' which is almost entirely driven by the dog's fear of disapproval from the master. The master can rile up the dog to attack a rabbit but then suddenly make it feel sorry for having killed the bunny. Thus, 'dog guilt' has no agency, and the same goes for 'white guilt' that always looks over its shoulder at Master Jew. So, 'white guilt' has been made to feel terribly about what happened to Emmett Till long ago but feels no comparable emotions about whites having aided and abetted in the destruction of countless Arabs and Muslims in the Middle East. The difference is the Jewish Master orders whites to grovel at the altar of Emmett, all the while barking ever loudly for more Wars for Israel. After all, if white conscience were for real and if whites truly condemned all forms of 'racism', they would not only condemn Neo-Nazi elements but the Zionists who continue to occupy Palestinian lands, wage Wars for Israel, and encourage terrorism in Syria.

Wanna join the elites? If you’re white, you have to be a cowardly dog. If you’re Jewish, you have to be a nasty weasel. And that is why It’s JEWS AND ISRAEL all the time by all the elites. Jews are uber-elites, whites are unter-elites. Unter must bow down before the Uber. Whites are to Jews what Rudolf Hess was to Adolf Hitler, what Lavrentiy Beria was to Josef Stalin, what Zhou En-Lai was to Mao Zedong.

CHINA DECEPTION; GAME OF MISDIRECTION! - https://www.bitchute.com/video/EAteKtxj0Fai/

American Democracy cannot function without Naming the Dominant Power — How Rise of Secular Society and Fading of Religion led to Sacralization of the Secular Sphere — The Rules of Elite Selection among Jews, Whites, and Blacks

American Democracy was never what it claimed to be, but it's gotten far worse since the end of the Cold War. For democracy to work at least halfway, the Power has to be named and criticized. US had that at least that degree of democracy for most of its history. WASPs were in control, and they never denied it. Indeed, much of US history was about WASP dominance and WASP negotiation with non-wasps to make for a fairer republic. So, these processes did lead to genuine reforms and progress. Why? Because the Power was named and negotiated with. So, even though US democracy was always controlled by money and far from ideal, there was at least the fundamental dynamics among power, truth, justice, and compromise. Power was held by WASPs, and that was the truth. In a way, WASPs deserved this power because they laid down the foundations of America and did much to build and reform it. But, given what America stood for and the contributions of other groups as well, there was need for power-sharing and better justice. And to achieve this, there needed to be series of compromises between the WASPs and non-Wasps, white and non-white. And so, on those truths of power, justice, and negotiation, the US did lurch forth as a better-working democratic project and political experiment than most others. Furthermore, for most of US history, people worshiped God. Even in the 'bad old days' of so-called 'white supremacy', whites were not worshiped. They had the fear, respect, and/or admiration of others, but they were not objects of worship that one couldn't question.

But since the end of the Cold War, the US hasn't functioned even as a flawed, marred, or imperfect democracy. None of the elements necessary for a working democracy/republic is evident in the US. In terms of power, the US history has two parts: The long history of Wasp rule, and the new era of Jewish rule. Thus, only two groups really held dominant power in America. Wasps and Jews. But whereas Wasps never hid or denied their power and dominance, that's all Jews do 24/7. Indeed, Jews bitch and whine about 'white supremacy' just when white power is in steep decline while Jews are snatching up everything. It is a dirty trick to hide Jewish Power behind the bogeyman of the ever-present 'white privilege'. Also, Jewish screeching about 'white supremacy' is really fearful of white consciousness that wants independence from Jewish Supremacism that wages crazy wars, financially fleeces the world, and spreads lies & filth via control of media, academia, so-called non-profit organizations, and organs of the state. White desire for freedom, emancipation, and liberation from Jewish Supremacy is what is smeared as 'white supremacy'.

Now, is it possible to have a functioning democracy when the dominant power refuses to show its face? While the Wasp elites of old were hardly saints or angels, they at the very least admitted they had the power, and therefore, negotiations could be sought on that basis of truth. But how can any democracy work when the most powerful group won't even acknowledge it has the dominant leverage over the nation but instead hoists up puppets like Joe Biden who squeak about 'white supremacy'? What are these goyim but Jewish-controlled Whores or Jewhores? Biden is just a figurehead behind which Jewish Power does as it wishes, but we aren't supposed to notice or talk about Jewish Power. Instead, we must pretend that Jews are still a beleaguered minority whom we must protect and favor for sympathy. So, even though Donald Trump let Jonathan Pollard fly off to Israel and the GOP grovels before the memory of Sheldon Adelson(the freak) out of sheer cravenness, they pretend their stance is of compassion than fear.

Even an autocracy where it is well-known who has the power is likely to work more honestly than a so-called democracy where the true power won't even admit to its alpha dog status. In Russia, Putin's regime has the power, and this fact is known to all. In China, the CCP has the power. So, if people need to get something done, they know whom or what they must deal with. But what good is a democracy when, despite all its declarations of principles about truth-liberty-justice, people cannot even name who has the real power?
It's like one's better off boar-hunting with a spear if, at the very least, one can spot and see the boar. But what good is a high-powered rifle in a boar-hunt when one isn't even allowed to see the boar? No matter how good the weapon, you'll never bring down the boar because blinders are always on to hide the beast. Because there is no truth in the current Jewish-run US, what passes for 'justice' and 'progress' are meaningless. Sure, there is much talk about 'racism', 'white supremacism', 'homophobia', 'transphobia', and etc., but they all miss the boat on what ship the US is sailing. The KKK is no longer around. And where exactly is this 'white supremacism' unless we gets all paranoid about so-called 'micro-aggressions' and 'Karens'? And does anyone really believe it's a great social injustice to say men-pretending-to-be-women have no business in the women's restroom or in women's sports?

Students at Oberlin College can hallucinate all the KKK they want. Jussie Smolletts of the world can cook up more 'hate hoaxes'. BLM can pretend innocent blacks are gunned down by 'racist' cops. Such nonsense will not fix the real problems of America, much of it metastasizing from Jewish Power. Jews run Wall Street and resort to insider schemes to rake in billions. Jews control the Fed and can pump endless cash to Wall Street. Jews control foreign policy and push the US to the brink with great powers. Jews have also turned much of Middle East and North Africa in hell holes. And what greater injustice taints the US than its aiding and abetting in Israel's annihilation of Palestinian nationhood and identity? Jews control the media as propaganda machines. Jews promote cultural pollution that have rotted the souls of so many young people. Jews control gambling, which is really theft on a massive scale. Jews use big pharma to addict people to all manner of mostly useless drugs. Sacklers were among the worst. Jews push for mass immigration/migration, legal and illegal, on all nations except Israel in order to use diversity as a wedge within goy nations.

All of the above are big, big problems, and they are matters of great injustice, but we can't talk about them because (1) we aren't supposed to notice Jewish Power and (2) Jews control the means of discourse & matters of dogma and convinced so many idiot goyim into taking poison as medicine. Indeed, much of the hot topics for debate have been devised by Jews to either (1) distract us from the truth of Jewish Power or (2) to serve Jewish interests by other means. Why do Jews tolerate and even encourage all the idiot conzos yapping about China-China-China? Because Jews figure it's better for idiot goyim to blame China than Jewish Power for the insane election of 2020 and other globalist shenanigans. And why do Jews hype up Russia-Russia-Russia? That way, all the 'suberals' (so-called 'liberals' subordinate in body and soul to the Jewish-controlled Deep State) will blame Russia for whatever goes wrong and, furthermore, support the 'new cold war' that is really a Jewish plan to destroy National Russia. Why not, as Jews regard Slavs much like Adolf Hitler and the Nazis did: A race of helots who should just obey and serve the superior race of Jewish Semites.

The US went from an imperfect union and flawed democracy to a supremacist ethnocratic state dominated by Jews who won't admit they got the power. This is surely the most surreal power-arrangement in history. US as lone superpower is the most powerful empire that ever existed, BUT its Jewish rulers pretend they haven't the power. But then, Israel has 300 nukes pointed at Iran whereas Iran has zero nukes, but the alarm is about "Iran will get the bomb to blow up Israel!" Like the saying goes, "Jew cries out in pain as he strikes you." That's American Politics in a nutshell and as America controls the world, it's the state of World Affairs.

In just about every case in history, those with the power were full of pride and glory, even outward arrogance and hubris. The saving grace was people knew who had the power. This was especially true with kings and emperors. In a way, the development of representative government(falsely called 'democratic' though technically a republic) began the process of obfuscating power. Unlike kings and lords who held the throne and hogged the power, representative government was based on the principle that elected leaders didn't govern for their own glory or pride but for other groups or The People. Thus, they were spokesmen for special interests or the chosen representatives of The People. But if representatives are chosen by the People, which people? Also, who are financing the campaigns to make certain candidates viable? Are elections decided more by money and special interests or the will of the people? And what is the will of the people when people's minds are molded by media concentrated in the hands of few oligarchs who generally hire reliable hacks than truth-seeking journalists?

Thus, despite certain advantages of so-called 'democracy', it is in some ways the most dishonest system of governance. Essentially, puppets of special interests win offices in the name of serving The People who are, more often than not, duped. Unfortunately, most people tune out of politics because it's boring, dirty, depressing, and corrupt. They say they despise politicians but don't want to get involved. So-called democracy or republic uses so-called politicians as fronts for the real ruling class made up of oligarchs and elite institutions. It's like the Corleone Family had a lot of 'buffers'. Radical Jews used fronts during the Hollywood Blacklist, but Jews continue to use fronts despite their immense power. George W. Bush, Joe Biden, and Barack Obama were total fronts/buffers. Donald Trump turned out to be a front also due to lack of will or lack of choices. But even prior to the rise of Jewish Power, democracy was always a kind of shamocracy because politicians were usually fronts/buffers of the real power. Indeed, a so-called democracy is rule by the Real Power(of industry and institutions) through vetted puppets whose playacting creates the illusion of being the People's Choice.

That said, when Wasps ruled America, it was well-known that Anglo-Germano-Americans dominated the industries & institutions and thus owned most of the political puppets. So, even though most politicians were tools back then as well, it was understood they were serving the Wasp elites as the real puppet-masters. And because the spotlight was on the Anglo-Germano-American elites, not least by Jews who grew increasingly powerful in the media, the ruling elites were under pressure to live up to principles of fairness and justice based on truth of power.

But today, with Jews having the power but lacking the integrity to admit to their power, any honest, truthful, and fair-minded discussion of power is impossible. No wonder there is so much talk of 'hate' and 'supremacy', but it is never directed against Zionism and Jewish hegemonism. When the Anglo-American elites messed up Guatemala and Vietnam, there was moral outrage about the military-industrial complex. But Jewish Power hardly gets any blame for what has been done to Middle East and North Africa.

But things are even worse. In a way, America was a more secular nation when most people worshiped God. God is bigger than any man or any group. Because God is so great and mysterious, American politics rejected any theocratic tendencies. God was too big for man's game of earthly power. People's spiritual life was devoted to God while their political participation was in the world of man. So, people went to church for God and looked to governments for politics. Spirituality was for divine matters, and politics was for human affairs. As God was real in people's lives, they looked to church for spiritual meaning. There was no need to seek out the godly or sacred in the secular sphere because God was very much alive in the church.
But the more society became secularized, the less people looked to church for spirituality. And yet, just like vegans crave protein, human nature is such that it longs for the spiritual. Having rejected God and church, people begin to erect idols within the secular sphere. So, MLK went from a great man to a godly figure. Sympathy for blacks turned into Negrolatry of BLM and rich folks washing the Negroes' stinky feet. 'Gay rights' turned into Gay Rites, and now, Mainline churches are dominated by cynical lesbians whose only interest in religion is to make it serve globo-homo. And of course, Shoah went from historical tragedy to eternal faith in the holiness of Jews.
Thus, paradoxically enough, the more secular society became, the more quasi-spiritual it became WITHIN THE SECULAR SPHERE ITSELF. Secular became sacral, resulting in 'Securalism'. Also, whereas secular society in the past remained secular precisely because people sought spiritual needs in the church, secular society became increasingly less rational, factual, empirical, critical, and skeptical because of the 'new gods' of Jew Worship, Holy Homo, and Magic Negro within the supposedly secular domain.
Jews not only control the narratives and idols. They control the gods, the icons and narratives glowing with sanctimony and burning with moral outrage. If sympathy for Jews, blacks, and homos was sufficient in the past, it no longer is. One must show due reverence and worship. One must get down on the knees. And never mind the cold hard facts. Never mind that Jews are acting like the new nazis. Always see them as a bunch of Anne Franks. Never mind blacks are the top criminals and their thuggery is the product of 100,000 yrs of evolution alongside lions and baboons. Just pretend blacks are sacred earth children and all their problems stem from 'white racism'. And don't dare say anything that might hurt 'gay' feelings(such as "homo-fecal-penetration is gross, ewwww, and a pain in the ass") because homos are holy and that means their feelings are simply divine. And as trannies are closely allied with homos, don't even think of offending a man who says he's a 'woman'. Facts don't matter. Just take on FAITH that the gods controlled by Jews deserve our reverence and obedience.

In such a socio-political climate laden with pseudo-spirituality, what kind of people make it to the top? Obviously, no one with true or innate conscience has any chance of making to the top. The mere fact that you refuse to designate a tranny-man as a 'she' is grounds for no promotion, demotion, or even dismissal. No one with true conscience can rise in the current order of mendacity and compulsory worship of the new gods.
Among all the political candidates, Tulsi Gabbard came closest to exhibiting some degree of principles and integrity, but how far did she get? Donald Trump seemed more brazen and principled against his opponents in the GOP primaries in 2016, but he won for style and swagger than integrity or honesty; and he proved to be a total dud, faker, coward, blowhard, and moron.

American Politicians and the Deep State ruling class bang their pots and pans about justice and progress, but none of it's about innate conscience or personal morality. Rather, it's about feigning moral outrage in tune with pre-scripted narratives. So, all these politicians drone on and on about how Israel is sacred to Americans and how they're committed to its survival, blah blah. But in fact, Israel is the biggest power in the Middle East and is in the process of totally erasing the remaining Palestinian territory. Politicians refer to leaders like Vladimir Putin as 'killers' because it's part of the Approved & Obligatory Morality Tale. All this moral furor is akin to dogs barking to win the approval of their master. Thus, it's not true conscience. Anyone with an ounce of real conscience, like Tulsi Gabbard, gets nowhere, while those who feign moral conscience on matters approved by Jewish Supremacists are slated for the top positions. "US intervention has ruined the lives of countless Syrians" gets you nowhere, but "Assad is tyrant and killer" gets you money support and media approval from the Jews.

Also, true conscience is near-impossible when people worship false gods of THIS world. Conscience requires people to be critical and factual. What's the point of conscience if it dares not speak the truth? In the past, someone like Daniel Patrick Moynihan exhibited something like true conscience. He felt genuine sympathy for blacks given their historical experience. And yet, he also noted certain problems of culture and values in the black community. Sympathy didn't negate criticism. Back then, blacks were big news but not holy. Even the later canonized MLK could be called into question.
But how can there be true conscience now when we must believe the fiction of BLM and look upon Negroes as next to godliness? Sure, those who chant BLM slogans express lots of moral outrage, but it is mindless and stupid, either the product of cowardice or fanaticism. It's not true conscience. People like Moynihan aren't possible in government anymore because Jews control the gods, and there are certain things we can't be critical of or factual about. What passes for 'conscience' in our age is sheepishly swallowing the dominant narrative, mindlessly worshiping the approved idols, and stupidly regurgitating the catechisms of 'wokeness'. This has led to certain GIVENS in the current order, and even Tulsi Gabbard isn't immune to them, as when she felt compelled to join in the Zionist denunciation of BDS. It's understood by all that it's just a GIVEN of politics and power that you must kiss Jewish Ass if you are to get anywhere. Jewish Power is such that it's not even worth debating the moral merit. It's like Stalin was always right in the USSR, and that was a given, something you simply couldn't even question. Not only do Jews control America, not only are most goy elites a bunch of craven cucks, but the masses of Americans have been soul-poisoned by Jewish Media to favor Judeo-Nazis over Palestinians. So, even if a honest politician chose to damn the torpedoes and spoke the truth about the evil of Zionist Imperialism, he would not only get attacked from above but from below as his constituents will vote him out of office for having dissed holy-schmoly Jews and Israel.

The war on true conscience affects Jews too. There are Jews of some conscience, like Max Blumenthal, Philip Weiss, Glenn Greenwald, and Norman Finkelstein. But they've been demoted or dismissed. They are forced to work in the margins.
Indeed, the current Jewish-dominated Rules of Elite Selection require Jews to be nasty and white goyim to be craven. If a Jew shows signs of genuine decency, he is rejected because his true conscience might criticize the iron grip that AIPAC has on America. As a decent Jew, he might be willing to work toward more humane solutions with Palestinians, Arabs, and Iran. And as a principled Jew, he might support free speech and call for honest discussions on all topics, even those inconvenient for Jewish Power. Of course, Jewish Supremacism that rules America simply can't tolerate such Jews. So, decency among Jews is a big no-no in the game of Elite Selection. Decent Jews need not apply.

NORMAN FINKELSTEIN - THE BEST OF

Among white goyim, the favored trait is cravenness. After all, if traits of courage and toughness were favored, white goyim with brass balls may rise to the top, and such individuals may well speak truth to Jewish Power. Indeed, what Jews hated most about Trump was his tough-guy act and, at least in 2016, didn't act like a suckass at the feet of Jewish Power. (But in office, his bark turned out to be far worse than his toothless bite.)
Among black goyim, the favored trait is opportunism. After all, if honest and decent blacks made it to the top, they would ask, "Why do we support racial oppression in the West Bank when we denounce it in the US?" So, the kinds of blacks most favored are the Obamas and Kamala Harrises of the world. These blacks will sell their own mothers for a piece of the pie. They don't care about what harm the power does AS LONG AS they get to share in it. They bitch about American Power in the past mainly because blacks didn't have a big role in it. As long as blacks are allowed to share in the power, these blacks don't care if the US war machine wrecks the planet or if the US financial regimen robs the globe. As long as blacks too get to play the game and hog some of the prestige, they are fully onboard with the game of empire. How many blacks raised a fuss about nations destroyed by Obama? Hey, he's a black man in charge, so that's okay.

So, under Jewish Dominance, US democracy is utterly dysfunctional, and in the game of Elite Selection, the trait of nastiness is favored among Jews, trait of cravenness is favored among whites, and trait of opportunism is favored among blacks. No wonder the ruling class is now completely worthless. Nasty Chuck Schumer and Jerry Nadler. Craven Mitt Romney and Dan Crenshaw. And opportunistic Obama and Harris. A world of maggots.

"'AMALEK' AND THE CONTROLLED MEDIA"

What's in a Word: The Politicization of the Term APPEASEMENT — In the Current Order, If You Appease Jewish Supremacism, You're Not an 'Appeaser', but If You Call for Reasoned Negotiations with Those Hated by Jews, You Are an 'Appeaser'... funny how that works

THE HUGE DEMOCRAT PARTY COUP by Brother Nathanael

A clear case of the Power of the Word is 'appeasement'. When it is and when it is not an appeasement? It's like 'hate'. When Jews hate you, it's not hate. But if you're even mildly critical of Jews, you might be a 'hater'. And what is 'extreme'? These days, a man with a big chunky pair of balls who claims to be a woman is a 'woman'. That is the New Normal. But a conservative(or a lesbian/feminist) who might disagree could be branded as 'extreme'. Once, you had to be Nazi-like to be 'extreme'. But now, the mere desire of Hungarians to preserve their national integrity is condemned as 'extreme' and 'far right'. But then, when Jews are truly zealous of their identity, heritage, and territory in Israel, we must all get behind the Tribe. If you criticize Zionism or call for a measure of justice for Palestinians, you get smeared like Jeremy Corbyn. You are either an 'Anti-Semite' or harboring it among your flock.

Back to 'appeasement'. It's a famous(and even infamous) term usually associated with the supposed wimps and weaklings who caved to Adolf Hitler and the Third Reich. Say the word 'appeasement', and Neville Chamberlain's deal with Hitler will come to mind. In the West, it's also been used to smear those who call for constructive dialogue with Iran(because, of course, whatever Jews hate is the 'new hitler'). Neocon Jews and their cuck-puppets never tire of denouncing others as akin to the craven cowards who cut a deal with Hitler. So, acknowledgement of Iran's legitimate interests is tantamount to repeating the mistakes of 1939 and paving the way for more horrors, maybe even Another Holocaust!

'Appeasement', like 'phobia', is not a neutral or objective term. It is judgmental and condemnatory. If someone is said to be 'phobic', it means his fears are utterly irrational, unfounded, and pathological. So, if someone is opposed to non-stop immigration that might forever transform the character of his homeland, he isn't a patriot with sound anxieties but a bigot with sickness in his head(and soul): A 'xenophobe'. Likewise, 'appeasement' isn't merely negotiation or compromise but a craven bargain with the devil. Of course, the accusation can come from any side. After all, German critics of Hitler could have argued Der Fuhrer appeased the British and the French in promising not to press for more German territories lost in World War I in exchange for Chamberlain's acceptance of German fait accompli in Czech Territory.

Because the term 'appeasement' is so judgmental, historians should be careful in its use. It is more a form of editorializing than understanding. The term is problematic even within its own definition. After all, if 'to appease' means: To placate or attempt to placate (a threatening nation, for example) by granting concessions, often at the expense of principle", then it is an all-too-common occurrence. Power differentials are a fact of life as most parties in any situation are not equal. Some are richer, better connected, more prestigious, more influential, and more powerful. So, it's often the case that the weaker party has to make concessions to the powerful side. But, most such interactions or transactions are not called 'appeasement'. So, even appeasement isn't 'appeasement' if it's approved by the Power/System or the established way of doing business.

What is the most powerful group in the US? It's the Jews, and so much of US politics, economics, and social policy is about non-Jews sucking up to Jews. Politicians suck up to the demands of Wall Street and the Donor Class, both heavily Jewish. Anyone who wants to work in Hollywood has to suck up to Zionists. Mutter something about BDS or criticism of Jewish Power, and you shall be blacklisted. US politicians of European backgrounds never make pilgrimages to their own ancestral homelands. Rather, they go to Israel, put on a yarmulke, and stand before the Wailing Wall. They all suck up to Jews by invoking the memory of the Shoah while ignoring most other horrors of the 20th century or any other era. US politicians shill for Israel and spew hatred against Iran. They stand in line outside AIPAC as willing lackeys for More Wars for Israel. All such behaviors certainly qualify as acts of appeasement but are never called out as such by the Big Media and Big Academia that are controlled by Jews.
Appeasing Jewish Power is so approved and 'normal' in US politics that it's never slapped with the seal of 'appeasement'. Indeed, it's become so second-nature to Americans that they're blind to their own craven cuckery. After 2020 election, you'd think American Conservatives would finally wake up to Jewish Power. Trump surely appeased the Jews a thousand times but got rammed in the arse just the same. In other words, 'With Jews, you lose'. But all we get from The Donald is more appeasement to Neocons who threaten Iran and all we get from Trumpeteers is 'China, China, China'. Never mind China too was in the business of appeasing the Jews as the go-to ruling elites of the US. The bargain was China would get a piece of the pie if it aided Jews in the demise of white identity and power.

Apparently, 'appeasement', like 'Hate', is always something done by people, regime, or nation that happens to be disapproved by the Power — when Jews hate(Russia, White Christians, Syrians, Arabs, Palestinians, Hungarians, etc.), it's never called hate. While it's been said a million times that Neville Chamberlain appeased Hitler, it's hardly been mentioned that Winston Churchill(and FDR) appeased Joseph Stalin by conceding all of Eastern Europe to the Iron Curtain. After all, Churchill and FDR are still remembered as great men. Richard Nixon was much lauded for meeting with Mao Zedong. It wasn't called an appeasement of a Red Monster. But the merest sign of Trump wanting to work with Vladimir Putin was condemned as 'appeasement' of 'Putler'. But then, the GOP cucks called Obama's deal with Iran as 'appeasement', once again invoking World War II, even though Obama did it under the control of J-Street Jews who were seeking to ease Iran out of the Russia-China orbit. GOP cucks misled the public with the charge that the US under Obama funneled billions upon billions of US taxpayer money to Iran when the money was Iran's own that had been frozen in the US.

In the West, there are two kinds of appeasement. There are those who appease Jews in the most pathetic and shameless manner. John McCain was champion at this, but most GOP and Democratic politicians are top contenders. They know all the doggy tricks. This might be called 'positive appeasement'. But there is another kind that might be called 'negative appeasement'. Take Rand Paul. While he often displeases Jewish Power by refusing to back every War for Israel, he won't call out on Jewish Power. He turns every discussion or policy issue into an abstract discussion of principles and the Constitution. But current events and prevailing trends cannot be understood apart from the hypocrisy of Jewish Power that yammers about 'equity' and 'social justice', all the while pushing for policies that only make Jews even richer and make Israel even more dominant in the Middle East.

In a fair world, nothing should be called 'appeasement' or anything fitting the description should be thus labeled. So, if what Chamberlain did was appeasement, so was Churchill's deal with Stalin. And all the minor nations and powers within the US empire should also be called appeasers. What does Europe do nowadays but constantly appease the US that is controlled by Jews? Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, and etc. are appeasers of the US empire. Colombia is a suck-ass appeaser of US power. And US politicians are mostly craven appeasers of Jewish Power.
But, the term is used selectively to demean ONLY THOSE who concede in a manner that is disapproved by Jewish-controlled US empire that shapes the narrative and discourse around the world via its lock on academia and media and deep state.

Appeasing Jewish Power means one must also appease whatever is favored by Jews. So, if Jews say BLM, one must appease black thuggery as the 'new sainthood'. Even though blacks are the most violent criminal class in the US, one must sing hosannas to magic blackness. And of course, the homos. Jewish Power promoted holy homos, and that means one mustn't upset homos lest he also displease Jews who must be appeased at all times. Jews are the 'Made Men' of US power, and that means the only functional 'law' of the land is Whatever Jews Want. Appease globo-homo. Sodomy is the new god, or godomy. Jews demand it, so you better obey. If a tranny says he's a woman, you better use 'proper pronouns' where he is a 'she' or even a 'they'. Surely, powerful Jews are cracking up behind closed doors at the sheer stupidity and/or cowardice of goyim.

So, we have a situation where everyone must appease the Jews in order not to be labeled an 'appeaser'. It's like one must hate whatever Jews hate in order not to be called a 'hater'. And it's not enough that most people in the West appease Jews. There are still some who say the US should be on better terms with Russia or some nation hated by Jews, and that is lambasted as 'appeasement'. Jewish Power is like a jealous god that says "Ours Only". Everyone must appease the Jews, but that is not appeasement apparently. But if you dare suggest that US negotiate or compromise with any side hated by Jews, you are a damn 'appeaser'! What a rotten state of affairs.

In the current order, your appeasement is not appeasement if it's approved by the Power. But even if you don't appease but call for negotiations or dialogue with a side hated by Jews, you are an 'appeaser'. If you smooch the Jewish Supremacist Ass, you're not an appeaser. But if you merely call for the end of the illegal US occupation of Syria, you are 'appeasing' Assad the 'butcher of Syria'.

Just like the US dollar is the world currency, Jewish Outrage of Tri-Supremacism(centered on Jews, Negroes, and Homos) has become the world moral currency. The only way to earn 'woke' currency is by appeasing the supremacism of Jews, megalomania of Negroes, and vanity of homos. Thus, every European nation has a Holocaust Museum, and homo prides are spreading around the world to showcase that "Our nation has accepted Gayspel as the new gospel'. Or even nations without blacks or black problems make a fuss with BLM to show they are with the program.

Western elites are worse than ever because the terms of elite selection favors the supremacists among the Jews but saps and flunkies among whites. A Jew who is conscientious and critical of Jewish Power hardly gets anywhere. Just ask Norman Finkelstein who couldn't even secure a gig at second-tier college DePaul. A Jew has to be supremacist to make his way to the top. But when it comes to whites, anyone exhibiting any independence of thought or anything resembling courage/integrity is struck down. He's not even admitted to elite college if, for example, he posted something on Twitter or Facebook that might displease Jews, homos, or blacks. That means the kind of whites who rise to the top are saphead cucks who go along to get along. They may still be smart and capable, but they are born appeasers and toadies than mavericks and men of independence. In other words, the likes of Mitt Romney, John McCain, Ben Sasse, Brian Kemp, Paul Ryan, and etc. are allowed to rise to the top. (It's an Asianization of the West. In the East, exams are treated as an end than a means to an end. Exams aren't so much a gauge of success as success itself. So, Asians don't think independently but merely study whatever is approved to pass the exams as proof of their success. In the quasi-Confucian Neo-West, whites must pass the PC exam of approved thought than think independently. Millennials grew up to favor approval of thought than independence of thought.) So, the result is a system run by sniveling Jewish supremacist masters and groveling white goy cuck dogs. But, we are told that white cuckery isn't appeasement because Jews control the narrative and decide what is what.

The Huge Democrat Party Coup by Brother Nathanael