White Dumbness vis-a-vis Jews and White Weakness vis-a-vis Blacks — Need for White Race-ist Unity — Whites must be like Asian Indians if they're to avoid the Fate of American Indians

https://buchanan.org/blog/the-new-systemic-racism-that-is-coming-138889

A commenter asked in reply to the Patrick J. Buchanan article:

"I still don’t get how all this happened… Whites aren’t dumb or weak… Where did it all go wrong?"

'Dumb' and 'weak' are relative terms. In relation to whom and what?

If Jews never came to the US, whites would still be on top and would be setting the narrative and agenda. Sure, there would be liberal whites, but they would be in balance with conservative whites. Both liberalism and conservatism have value, and one provided reform and novelty while the other provided stability and continuity, sense of heritage and roots. But Jews came along and used their power to tip the scale in favor of Liberalism. Thus, white liberalism came to be severed from white conservatism. (American History went from reconciliation and mutual respect between Northern whites and Southern whites following the Civil War to such condemnation of white identity & the American South that even white Southerners now do nothing to defend their heritage from feral blacks and PC radicals egged on by Jews who, at the same time, demand that white Southerners support Jim Crowitz in the West Bank. Dixie Chicks just calling themselves Chicks is typical of total Southern cuckery to Jews and the mob.) Liberalism without roots finds itself adrift. Liberals may bitch about conservatism, but liberalism without conservatism is like trees severed from roots. After all, liberalism is an outlook, and it needs a vantage point, i.e. it has to be liberal on a conservative foundation. Liberalism is like the sails on a boat, which would be like conservatism. Without the boat, the sails are useless. Or liberalism is like wings on a plane.Without the main body, the wings are useless.
Therefore, when white liberalism was severed from white conservatism, it had to serve another root-foundation, and this is where Jews made it serve Jewish Power aided and abetted by Jungle Fever/Faith & eventually Globo-Homo. As for white conservatism, it faced difficult times because Jews and their white liberal cucks said whiteness is problematic, then bad, then evil. So, white conservatism could no longer preserve white pride. For white conservatism to be viable, it had to drop the 'white' and just be conservative. Conservative about what? For some, conservatism merely meant conserving wealth(property values) or, paradoxically, the engine for change. (Consider David French whose idea of 'conservatism' is preserving the social forces that led to drag-queen story hour. In other words, American Conservatism = Conservation of forces that bring about the most rapid change.) But conservatism must conserve something other than 'muh money'. If whiteness is no longer worth preserving because of 'white guilt', then white conservatism, having dropped the 'white', had to serve another identity and culture, and again Jews made whites serve Jewish identity that was deemed noble because of Holy Holocaust Cult and its great heritage. If white liberals became subservient to Jews mainly on the basis of Jewish victim-hood, white conservatives became reverent of Jews mainly on the basis of Jewish heritage — Paul Johnson, one of the premier cuckservatives of the Cold War era, often made the case that Judaism is essentially conservative and so, Jews will eventually come around to the political right; the fool overlooked the fact that Jewish 'conservatism' is about maximizing Jewish Power by any means necessary, even by pushing deracinating liberalism on whites, which explains why so-called Neocons worked with Jewish Liberals to undermine white identity and pride. The Neo-Con-Federacy alliance didn't last long. White Southerners supported Zionists, but Zionists took a big dump on white 'racism', just like Apartheid South African support of Zionism didn't prevent most Jews from reviling white-ruled South Africa as the worst thing possible. At any rate, adopting Jewish Identity as the main theme of American Conservatism was bound to be devastating to white conservatism because the main villains of the Shoah were 'white supremacists'(though, to be sure, Nazi Germans were 'Aryanists' whose greatest crimes were against other whites, especially Slavs and Jews, if counted as 'white'). Jewish victim-narrative essentially blames whites and Christians for everything.

Now, Jews could pull this off because they are smarter than whites by one standard deviation. But what about Episcopalians whose IQs are comparable to Jews? Their religion was weak, they were more about class & privilege than blood-spirituality(or ethno-religious identity of Jews), and over time, their values just became bloodlessly following the latest fashion among trendy elites. Also, Jews have stronger and pushier personalities than Episcopalians who would rather lose a fight against feisty Jews than get down and dirty. Jews were especially effective in subverting white power because of their passive/aggressive nature. If Jews were ONLY aggressive, whites would have told them to screw off. But Jews would approach whites with sappy eyes and plead for sympathy for Anne Frank and 'muh holocaust'; and whites, out of Christian magnanimity and conscience, ceded to Jews the notion that the Holocaust was the greatest evil in world history and therefore ANY negative aspersion about Jews is 'antisemitic', therefore akin to Nazism. Whites thought they were being nice to poor pitiful Jews, but Jews were planting a moral trap underneath the white ass, especially as the history of 'antisemitism' was mainly a white European/Christian thing. Once that premise was accepted as part of Official White Morality, it meant that Jews could dump on whites all they want but whites better not dump on Jews in kind because it'd be so awful and hurt the feelings of those poor pitiful boo-boo-baby Jews. Fast-forward to today, and NYT & other Jewish-run media dump on whites endlessly but whites dare not say anything back in kind to Jews. Jews dredge up all the dark past about white history, but whites dare not do the same about Jews. If anything, both white 'liberals' and 'conservatives' compete with one another on who is more pro-Jewish. Jews kick white ass, but whites are eager to kiss Jewish ass. Kick-Ass-Kiss-Ass is the dynamics between Jews and whites. And of course, to consolidate white cuckery and submission, Jews also pushed the Noble Negro cult to guilt-bait whites for all eternity. So, Jewish-run NYT and other media outlets feature black and yellow bitches dumping on white women as abettors of white male terrorism against blacks, but white men say nothing about how countless white women had been robbed, beaten, raped, or murdered by blacks. Tally up the numbers of white women robbed, beaten, raped, or murdered by blacks, and it far dwarfs the number of black thugs lynched by white mobs in a hundred years. But white men, 'lib' and 'con', are a bunch of maggoty wussy boys.
But then, there's another reason white men don't defend white women. Too many white women, being mental clay in Jewish hands, are into white self-loathing and anti-white hysteria as virtue-signaling. Indeed, consider how most of these 'Karens' who are denounced by Ugabundas and Skankishas happen to be urban 'liberal' proggy bitches. To many on the dissident right, there is a certain schadenfreude in watching these insipid whores get their just desserts, a taste of their own medicine. These deracinated slutty lowlife white traitor bitches watch TV shows and movies where white female characters go with Negro men and where white men are presented as creeps or dorks, and their worldview conforms to Jewish Hollywood propaganda. But when they are confronted with black thuggery and vileness, the first thing they do is CALL THE WHITE POLICE. Now, one may ask why did their parents raise such insipid kids? Because white parenting, especially beginning with the boomers, was 'anti-racist', but a people are finished without race-ism. Jews are race-conscious and gain in power. Blacks mess up everything but still gain in power because they are race-conscious. Whites lose and lose because they lost their race-ism. As boomer parents think there is nothing worse than 'racism', they raised their kids to worship Fartin Poother Bling. And these kids grew up to madonna the muddy skank and rap music and sexting each other photos of Negro dongs. And all they heard in schools is 'white racism', 'white supremacism', 'evil of antisemitism', 'evil of homophobia', and etc. But on some subconscious level, they grew up feeling uncomfortable because it's not natural to hate your own kind. It's no wonder the 'gay' stuff spread like wildfire among whites, even with 'conservatives', because it's like the last expression of 'whiteness'. And it's no wonder that blacks eventually caught onto this and are insisting on making June the month of Homeys than Homos. Sheeeeeeiiiit, Juneteenth be da thang.
BLM and LGBT marching together is funny as hell because, despite the outward show of solidarity, they are expressions of opposing trends. BLM is about blacks doing as they please with roughhouse reparations of looting and burning, whereas Globo-Homo is about gentrification and yuppie-regeneration of the 'inner-city', code-word for parts of the town plagued with black crime and violence. Granted, there is a connection between blackness and homo-ness as plenty of white 'gay' buns crave black dongs — the butt-cucks — , but generally speaking, homo community caters to high-earners and the fancy-pants crowd than to hood rats.

Now, the 'weak' part. Again, it's relative. Without Jews and blacks, whites would be on top of the world in the West. Mentally, whites are strong against all groups except Jews. Some may say yellows have IQ comparable or even slightly higher than whites, but the difference isn't all that notable. Also, as yellows happen to be docile and dog-like, they are incapable of gaining power and authority as a minority. Chinese are successful minorities in Southeast Asia but in a precarious than prestigious position — it's no wonder Chinese would rather settle in New Zealand, Australia, Canada, and the US where they face less animus and violence from the majority. If recently yellows are berating at and bitching about whiteness, it's only because they are dutiful and servile dogs of the prevailing ideology set by elite Jews. They are following orders as good little boys and girls.
So, only Jews could make whites seem 'weak' of mind. Jews have noticeably higher IQ, strong identity rooted in blood & spirituality, and pushy personalities, along with sneaky passive/aggressive strategy. The only other people who make whites look weak are, of course, the Negroes, especially as American Culture is mainly about pop music and sports. Rock music has black roots, but moreover, blatantly black rap overtook rock as the most popular musical form, and what is rap about the thuggish cult of black aggression? Also, Americans worship sports, and who dominate? Blacks do. NFL culture is rather odd in its current configuration, and it's no wonder that it is in a state of crisis. Most players are black, and the game is getting even blacker. These black guys rose up the ranks by thumping white guys in high school and college, and they hump tons of white women. BUT, the majority of the fans are white males, and many white male fans of football happen to be 'conservative'. So, you have a game that is mostly about Democratic black guys dominating the field and humping white women that is cheered on largely by white males, the majority of whom are 'conservative'. White male 'conservatives' have 'evolved' to the 'anti-racist' position along the lines of, "Look, we cheer for you awesome black guys, and you whupped our pathetic white butts and you can hump my wife and marry my daughter, but please oh please, show some respect to the red, white, & blue and stand during the national anthem." That's Rush Limbaugh 'conservatism'. But black players feel differently. They feel, "Sheeeeeeeiiiiit, we be badass mofos who be da kangs of dis here sports, and we done whup fa**oty white boys and hump white girls, and dem white boys in da stands just a bunch of punkass pussies who be begging fo' our autographs while dey's girlfriends be lustin' after our dic*s." Yep, that is how black players see the game, and why not? Suppose Germans were taken as slaves to Japan, and suppose they came to dominate the sports by beating up scrawny yellow Japanese men and were humping the yellow girls. Would these Teutonic giants feel any respect for yellow dorks begging for their autographs? Would they pay respect to the Japanese anthem and identity for long? No, they would be feeling, "We be Vikangz".
For better or worse, sports is at least 1/2 of American culture and identity. So, who dominates sports comes to shape the image of America. Without blacks, whites would dominate sports in the US, and the racial-national perception would be very different. Indeed, look at the harm done to French identity and pride as the result of black domination. Sure, the white French pretend they are all beyond race and that Frenchness has no color, but blacks notice color. They know they are kicking white French ass and France is being Africanized.

Now, one may argue that white people as a unity are more powerful than any other. After all, white imperialists took over all of Africa at one time. British fleet defeated China in two Opium Wars. Spanish took over all of what is now Latin America. This is true, but white power depends on unity of identity, and that means race-ism. Without white race-ism, there can be no white unity. Then, whites can only compete as individuals, and then they will lose mentally to Jews with higher IQ & nimbler verbal skills and lose to blacks who are more muscular and athletic. This is why 'anti-racism' is the most fatal thing to happen to whites. But with white unity, whites could easily push back against Jewish Power. And whites as a unity can kick black ass. In the movie ZULU, each black warrior is more muscular and faster than whites, but whites work as a disciplined team and mow down the savanna bunners with awesome race-ist efficiency. This is why only race-ism can save the white race or any race. This is why any white person who uses the term 'racist' as epithet is part of the problem and hardly better than fools who yammer "Democrats are the real racists."

Ultimately, the great tragedy of American History is that American Indians didn't have the personality and wiliness of Asian Indians. American Indians were a stoned-faced stone-age people who put up a fight against men with guns and wagons, then later trains. They had no hope of military victory. They fought bravely and have been honored as such, but their defeat was a foregone conclusion, and following their surrender, they just remained on Reservations and lived on bacon, tobacco, and firewater. They were 'dumb' like the big 'Injun' in ONE FLEW OVER THE CUCKOO'S NEST.
But imagine if American Indians were more like Asian Indians. After a few setbacks with fighting the white men, they would have put down the bows & arrows and try to deal with whites with words & wit. After all, white folks were far less likely to shoot a people who are always talking and balking than shooting off arrows or hurling tomahawks. Through incessant talk, the hindu-like American Indians might have wore down the white men on the matter of immigration. A compromise might have been reached where white Christian immigration is okay to a certain point, but come on, let's leave something for the Indians. And then, the hindu-like American Indians might even have convinced whites to send the blacks back to Africa on account of America being the land of the Indians, not of the Africans who have their own gigantic continent to themselves. Hindu-like American Indians might have argued incessantly, "Look, you white people come here and take so much. But, you built stuff and we Indians benefit too. But why did you bring all those blacks? It's bad enough we lost this land to you whites but should we lose it to blacks as well?" And hindu-like American Indians might have gotten better deals from whites with contracts. The real American Indians just trusted the white man, smoked the peace pipe, and went back to their teepees... only to discover that Pale Face was just fooling them. But hindu-like American Indians surely would have pressed upon whites to keep the word. "Look, we remember you people buying Manhattan with bead necklace. Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me, and no shame on me this time."

In DELIRIOUS, Eddie Murphy says you got to SING to get the girls. In SEVEN BEAUTIES, Pasqualino says, "More you pee, more you live." In our world, the more you talk, the more power you got. Even when they try to silence you, you have to keep talking and talking and talking. You have to join the conversation but not on their terms because PC is all about them talking while your side only listens or chants along or barks according to orders.




It's been observed by some that whites are like the NEW American Indians. Then, the lesson whites must learn from the fate of American Indians is that whites must act like Asian Indians to survive. American History could have been very different if American Indians fought less and talked more. Indeed, one reason why white folks in the South lent a certain ear to blacks was because the Negroes were always talking, like Jim in HUCKLEBERRY FINN. It's like the white massuh played by Chuck Connors in ROOTS has a fondness for Chicken George who always be talking. Frederick Douglas was full of talk, and of course, Fartin' Poother Bling was nothing without talk. And, you don't even need a boombox voice. Gandhi sounded like a geek, but he talked and talked and drove the British nuts like Groucho Marx with the Wasp characters.

It's incredible that Jews of all people hold such a vaunted MORAL position in the American Narrative. After all, if any people experienced something like 'genocide' and destruction on American soil, it was the American Indians, all the more tragic because they have roots here going back eons, tens of thousands of years. And yet, there is the Jewish Holocaust Museum in Washington D.C. than one commemorating the 'American Holocaust' of the Red Man. And even though mass immigration did in the Indians, the Statue of Liberty as symbol of immigration is so highly prized and celebrated. Also, the US has been nothing but a blessing for Jews. They didn't face the kind of discrimination they did in the Old World, and furthermore, Jews took part in slavery/slave trade and sold supplies to whites who rubbed out the Indians. So, Jews took part in the 'American Holocaust'. And yet, Jews hold the high moral ground in America. Why? They never stopped talking. In the end, talk determines 'truth'. If Bob did wrong to John, but if Bob does all the talking while John sulks and sits in the corner, everyone will go with Bob's word. He sets the narrative. It's like the scene in GOODFELLAS where Martin Scorsese's mother tells a joke about a man who never says anything.



How did Christianity became a great religion? The Early Christians faced persecution, but they never stopped talking and eventually caught the ears of some powerful and influential folks. In the end, it wasn't a case of "meek shall inherit the Earth" but "speak shall inherit the Earth". And this is why white Americans, as they face a demise similar to that of the American Indians, must not make the same mistake. Instead of being like the noble but 'dumb' Indian in ONE FLEW OVER THE CUCKOO'S NEST, they must be like Asian-Indians who never shut up. They must be like Babu(of THE SIMPSONS) or Ben Kingsley as Gandhi who's always talking and talking, even when he's sent to jail time and time again. To reiterate this point, white Americans should speak with a Hindu accent. Doing so will remind them that, unless they keep gabbing like Hindus, they will end up like the Red Man.
Whites should start with the topic of creating the white leagues in sports on the basis that white athletic inferiority needs is own space from blacks who make it virtually impossible for any other race to play, especially certain positions. So, let blacks have NBA and NFL, but let there be the white leagues. And why not? Blacks got their own chess tournaments as they can't compete with Jews. Now, the Powers-that-be will say NO, but whites should still keep talking and never drop the issue and should re-package it in so many ways. After all, the US has said NO to reparations-for-blacks so many times, but it's still on the menu because blacks never stop talking about it. (Whites should demand Realization among blacks. Realization over reparations. What would this Realization be? That, even though blacks got less than whites in the US, they got so much from contact with whites than they would have on their own if left alone in their own savagery of bongo drums and chucking spears at hippos. Sure, the argument of the Realization would be condemned as 'racist', but one must never stop talking. Even if the other side says NO, you keep making your case and drive home the point. It's like even a brick wall eventually breaks if you keep picking at it. In those prison movies, inmates eventually make a hole with a spoon. Why? They never give up picking at the wall. Words wear down the opposition only if you must keep on talking.) If whites give up on certain issues and stop talking, they lose. Even if there are setbacks, one must keep talking. Like 'gay marriage' for instance. Don't just accept it as 'the law of the land' but keep talking against it. Chip away at it bit by bit by bit. If the power of words made the Roman Empire eventually succumb to Christianity, the religion of pesty Jewish heretics, it can do wonders for whites in the long run but only if they keep talking. If the idea of White Leagues is rejected and banned, should whites give up on the idea? No, they should keep pushing for it with new arguments. Did homos and Jews give up on 'gay marriage' when the courts initially said NO? No, they pushed on. Meanwhile, American cuckservatives began to say NOTHING in opposition. When one side talks while the other side remains mute, the talkers win. So-called 'culture war' was really a game of Culture Words, and Jews and the 'left' talked more. In contrast, the 'conservatives' said close to nothing or took orders from Jews and merely said, "Muh Israel" and "Democrats are the real racists", thereby undermining the need for race-ism among whites.

Say the word and you will be free. There's a song by the Bangles, "Walk like an Egyptian", but the real lesson is "Talk like an Asian-Indian". And use their dotty accent to always remind yourself that if you don't keep talking, you will end up like the American Indians. In a way, it's ironic that American Conservatism is in such sad state despite having dominated Talk Radio. They sure did a lot of talking... but about what? 'Muh Israel', inanities about 'Feminazis', cheerleading for more Middle East Wars, Russia-bashing, Chicom-bashing, and 'Democrats are the real racists'. In other words, total BS and nothing about real issues, real truths, and real needs. White folks need to speak the truth of HBD in hindu accent. Talk truth, not nonsense.

Of Needles and Balloons - Two Kinds of Ideologies & Two Kinds of Sensibilities

The Current Discourse can be characterized as a contest between needles and balloons. Guess which will win when needles meet balloons. Needles of course. Needles are steely and sharp. Balloons may be bigger, but they are full of hot air and soft on the outside. Truth is like a needle, and lie is like a balloon. Integrity and honesty are like a needle, and deception and falsehood are like a balloon. Needles do not fear balloons. If anything, they are eager to pop and expose them as mostly inflated rubber holding nothing but hot air. In contrast, balloons are deathly afraid of needles because even the slightest prick can expose their emptiness.

Granted, a discourse could be between needle and needle or between balloon and balloon. Certainly, the ideological debate between Democrats and Republicans is one of balloon vs balloon. It’s a contest of hot air of empty rhetoric pre-scripted and pre-packaged by the oligarchs, the network, and the handlers. It’s about paid politician as streetwalkers for globalist oligarchic pimps. But the contest could be between needle vs needle. After all, two opposing sides could be equal in intelligence, honesty, and integrity even if they see things differently. Or both sides may be sincere in their conviction that truth is really on their side. After all, we can never know the whole truth. We can only know some of the truth, and we are all affected by some degree of subjective bias or personal passion.

Also, virtue is no guarantee for verity. A person may have all the integrity, ability, and courage, but his knowledge of truth is limited to his access to education and information. Furthermore, human character is less about known facts than about one’s ethos and values. A person can be virtuous within the context of Hindu customs or within the framework of Islamic culture. All True Believers, even of false doctrines or dubious ideologies, can be men of integrity and character if they are sincere in their conviction and courageous in their principles.
This is why basic virtues aren't sufficient to make people strive for the truth. Every thought system makes demands on people to be serious, committed, and loyal. Through obedience and adherence to core values, people can be virtuous.
But a higher value can only be attained by an individual quest for truth. A person mustn’t only receive and revere the Truth handed down to him but question its assumptions, meaning, implications, and validity. This is a higher kind of integrity than sincere devotion to the Order.

It is that combination of curiosity and courage that makes for a needle. A ‘conservative’ or a ‘liberal’ who merely conforms to what he’s been told by the Authority or the Official Narrative cannot be a needle. Such people are filled with varying amounts of air or limp without air, but they are essentially passive in their submissiveness to the Order. They are dogs and teachers’ pets of the world. Or, being just plain lazy, all their ideas come from Pop Culture that is controlled by Jews, homos, and cucky-wucks.
To be a needle, one needs to step outside the box. The truth is not in being ‘left’ or ‘hard left’ or ‘right’ or ‘hard right’ but in the individual will to ask questions and understand the deeper layers of power.

Also necessary is a kind of personal sensibility that favors sobriety and probity over frivolity and insipidity. The Power knows this all too well. It fears the Needles, and that is why the 2 PC’s — Political Correctness and Pop Culture — are geared toward making us shallow, immature, infantile, delusional, escapist, and stupid. When one’s primary ideology revolves around LGBTQ fantasies of 50 genders, Afromania of BLM & Rap, mindless mantras about Diversity, porny version of feminism with pussy-costumes, tattoos-piercings-hair-color, and etc., you can never be a serious person asking serious questions and seeking serious truths. Style has value but only as an accent on substance. Style cannot substitute substance, especially if it happens to be demented and stupid, as so many styles are today.

The needles are serious people who are not afraid to ask the essential questions about the Power and the Way of the World. Needles are not afraid to connect the dots in ways that deviate from the official dictates of the Power. Needles have something of the Greek Hero in them. Something inside them want to challenge the gods and know of their secret. They want to discover the truth behind the Wizard in the World of Oz. And this is why the Power fears and hates the needles the most.

And yet, the System needs needles because only needles can probe for the truth. Yet, needles are dangerous because they can pop the Official Balloon at the center of any system, left and right. So, the System tries to allow the freedom of needles in most areas EXCEPT against the Core Balloon that holds the hot air of Dogma. The Catholic Church, for instance, allowed and encouraged needles in many scientific endeavors but wanted to protect the balloon of the Geo-centric Universe that was deemed to be essential to the spiritual premise of Church and Faith. Every system seeks to maximize the power of truth because truth is more useful than falsehoods. Try building a rocket with false calculations or assumptions. Every scientific discovery or mathematic solution is a needle. They can be used to further the power of the system. But what about the political justification for the system? For communism to survive, Marxism-Leninism could not be doubted or questioned. Though it began as a sharp instrument aimed at the hot balloon of the Tsarist and then Social-Democratic system, it turned into a big balloon once the New Order was firmly ensconced with its own myths, symbols, and slogans. Communism became a big balloon with hammer & sickle painted on it. But despite its grandiose size, it could easily be busted with a prick of a needle. And this is why the balloon had to be protected from critical/skeptical/analytical needles by a vast apparatus of brass knuckles. The balloon needed a safe space from needles. Since balloon can’t stand up to the pricks of needles, it had to rely on the power of fists. It’s like the game of scissors-paper-and-hammer. Papers can’t stand up to sharp scissors, but the blunt hammer can bash the scissors.

And the world we live in is very much one of balloons, needles, and iron fists. Jews used to represent the needles of America when they spoke truth(or clever lies) to power. Jews were like a skillful acupuncturist probing into all parts of Wasp America to find how the system works. Its strengths and weaknesses. Its reactions to the needles. Even though Anglos were called Wasps, all the stinging was done by Jews. Some Jews needled the power for the truth or justice. But others just wanted to deflate the Wasp balloon so that they could take over as the new masters of America.

But a system cannot be sustained with search for truth alone. It has to be filled with a Narrative with the stuff of myth, vision, and holiness. There has to be a quasi-spiritual faith in the system as something more than a realm of facts. It had promote itself as a realm of sanctity. So, Jews created a new balloon with the Narrative air of Shoah, Afromania, Diversity(via Lazarus-ian mass immigration), and etc.

It wasn’t enough that Jews won by meritocracy in intellect and drive. After all, superiority in intelligence and wealth doesn’t necessarily mean justification for power and control. A people can be intelligent and influential but vile and wicked. Talent means more ability, not more morality. After all, Jews had gained lots of financial success in Europe and were regarded as smart/clever, but that didn’t make the gentiles love the Jews any better. In order for Jewish Power to be protected, it needed to be inflated and shrouded with a Narrative. And Jews found the Shoah Narrative highly effective in making Jews out to be the greatest victims of all time and in instilling ‘guilt’ among white goyim.
Some may regard the ‘holocaust deniers’ as courageous needles, but they are more like idiots cutting their own flesh. While there can be serious and probing revision of Shoah, most of what goes by ‘Holocaust Denial’ is truly moronic stuff. Incidentally, the real danger of the Shoah Narrative isn't in the suppression of free speech but in the ‘sacralization’ of Jews into a holy race. Such deification of a group of humanity can be dangerous IF the people become very powerful. If we all deified Eskimos, it can’t do us much harm because Eskimos have little power. But if, as the result of Shoah Narrative, we were to regard Jews as wise, wonderful, perfect, and noble, it means we won’t be properly alert to the nature of Jewish power. Also, because of the ‘sacralization’ via the Shoah Narrative, we’ve effectively been banned from taking a cold hard look at Jewish history and learn of Jewish perfidy, abuses, corruptions, and ‘historical crimes’. So, while we regard most peoples’ histories as a mix of good and bad, noble and ignoble, we tend to see all of Jewish history as one of wise, wonderful, and blameless Jews having been set upon by wicked gentiles who never had a rational reason for feeling animus toward the Jews.
Indeed, what Jews fear most is not ‘Holocaust Denial’ but serious discussion and criticism of Jewish history and power. The main purpose of the Shoah Narrative isn’t to suppress the ‘denial of Holocaust’ but to keep alive the aura of Jewish sanctity that maintains the Jew Taboo that forbids honest discussion of Jewish history and power.

In a way, both Jews and blacks triumphed and won in the West due to meritocracy though in different fields. When faced with a superior rival, only social race-ism will protect a people. We understand this in mankind's relation to animals. If we struggled with animals on the meritocratic basis of brute strength, animals would crush us. So, we ‘cheat’ via social species-ism that says species exist, species are different, and we-as-humans need to be conscious of our species and do whatever is necessary to secure our survival and advantage over animals. If humans were to compete with animals on the basis of natural species-ism, many animals would gain advantage over humans because, in the contest of tooth and claw, humans cannot win against bears, wolves, buffaloes, elephants, hippos, etc. Humans could only win via social species-ism that allowed for ‘cheating’ with spears, arrows, barriers, and shelters. So, we’ve created an artificial world that keeps animals out.
Likewise, white people could only maintain a secure place for themselves against Jews and blacks only through social race-ism. As Jews are smarter than whites and as blacks are more muscular than whites, there was no way whites could win against Jews in a contest of natural race-ist contest of wits. And there was no way whites could win against blacks in a contest of natural race-ist contest of fists.
The Natural is race-ist in that it created different races with different abilities. So, natural race-ism made Jews smarter than blacks, and it made blacks stronger than Jews. And it made Jews smarter than whites, and it made blacks tougher than whites.
Whites understood the ramifications of natural race-ism via-a-via Jews and blacks. So, whites instituted quotas against Jews in elite colleges and barred Jews from certain clubs. It was the ONLY way to maintain the order of white power. Natural-meritocratic competition with Jews would not lead to equality or parity but to Jewish supremacism over whites. Now, this might not have been so bad IF whites could speak truth to Jewish Power once Jews became King of the Hill, but Jews cleverly denied this possibility by pushing the Shoah Narrative that sanctified Jews into a quasi-holy race. So, Jews not only won with meritocracy but were protected from criticism by sanctimonious taboos. And much of the problems of America and the World can be traced to the sanctification of Jews.
It allowed leeway for Jewish power to become especially corrupt and megalomaniacal. Too many Jews are now intoxicated not only with power and hubris but with moral and pseudo-spiritual vanity. They are full of themselves. This is dangerous because Jews, as the masters of the Empire of Judea(or EOJ), are now the most powerful people on Earth with too much hatreds for too many peoples: Russians, Iranians, Syrians, Palestinians, White gentiles, etc.
Anyway, the lesson from the rise of Jewish supremacist power is that natural race-ism leads to hierarchy and domination, not equality. Meritocracy for Jews led not to Jewish equality with gentiles but Jewish supremacist domination over gentiles who are seen as cattle and dogs by Jews.

Whites suffered the same fate with blacks, albeit in the realm of physicality. Natural race-ist competition between whites and blacks could only lead to black supremacism than racial equality. Having more fast-twitch muscles, stronger bones, and faster reflexes, blacks were bound to dominate sports if whites and blacks were made to compete on an equal footing. Therefore, whites needed social race-ism to create a secure space for white manhood and pride. Whites, especially white men, were totally justified in fearing the stronger, tougher, and meaner Negro. If whites dropped social race-ism, the future wasn’t racial equality or parity but black physical domination, black destruction of white manhood, and black colonization of white wombs(and pathetic cucky-wuckery for white men). So, why didn’t whites speak out on this? D.W. Griffith did try with THE BIRTH OF A NATION, but even he failed because the Wasp character was into either white pride or gentlemanly ideal. White pride led many whites into denial. They continued to believe in the Great White Hope or pretend that whites were tougher and could beat up blacks. Such pride was hollowed out when blacks totally came to dominate sports and conquer millions of white wombs. Now, white males are cuck-dorks who kneel before blacks. If the white priders were too full of themselves to admit to their fear of the Negro and sound the racial alarm, the gentlemanly types felt it was beneath contempt to speak of vulgar biological realities. They preferred the world of rules and agreements. Since ‘may the best man win’ is a gentlemanly value, they eventually decided the fair and honorable thing was to let the Negro compete equally in sports with the white man. The result was predictable. Blacks totally crushed whites. Worse, even the gentlemanly hope that the dignity of sportsmanship would rub off on the ‘groids’ didn’t come to pass. Black nature being wilder and funkier, blacks intoxicated with pride of sports domination just acted like jungle warrior and showered whitey with nothing but contempt and derision. White gentlemanly delusions about blacks didn’t pan out. Blacks soon reverted to their jungleman ways. (Whites would have been better off if more of them spoke of racial matters like Howard Stern or Tom Buchanan of THE GREAT GATSBY. Buchanan is uber-wasp but oddly fully of grubby chutzpah when it comes to matters of race. His talk isn't gentlemanly but more blunt and candid.)

But as with Jews, it was worse than that. Just as Jews were ‘sacralized’ by the Shoah Narrative, blacks were ‘sacralized’ with slavery-Jim-Crow-and-MLK narrative. So, blacks not only physically kicked white butt but were seen as black jesuses and even black god. Now, if blacks had won athletically and physically(especially through crime and thuggery) and if whites could call out on black abuses and bad behavior, there would be some push-back against the threatening and destructive power of blacks. But because of the sacralization of blacks, whites not only got clobbered by blacks in the stadiums and streets but they couldn’t even honestly voice criticism of bad black behavior. Indeed, the Official Narrative of America now says whites must praise, admire, and worship the very people who rob them of manhood and/or property. So, if a black guy whups a white guy and humps white women, the proper thing for the white guy is to be a white boy like CucKen Burns and praise the Negro to high heaven as the sacred master race. This is why a people cannot survive and secure their existence without an intelligent use of social race-ism. As the first true race-ist, Aristotle said so himself.

And of course, Homos complete the Holy Three along with Jews and blacks. As such, the three groups have immense power in the West. And for that reason, it is incumbent upon honest critics and observers to be needles and prick the balloons of falsehood and sanctimony about the three powerful groups.
The truth is that Jews are indeed smarter, blacks are indeed tougher, and homos are more creative in certain areas. But the other truth is that these advantages also lead to lots of abuses. Jews use their domination of finance, law, and high-tech to pull all sorts of dirty tricks. Bernie Madoff was one of the worst but not alone. Now, Jews threaten to engulf the world with war just to further their ambition for global domination.
And too many blacks act like thugs and louts because they think "We can whup people’s ass". The blend of black vanity and thuggery has led to a very ugly culture in America. And homos have used their great power to elevate themselves as a race of angels even though the main distinction between normal straight people and homos is that the latter are into gross fecal penetration. Homos have done much to degrade moral norms and to impose degeneracy as the New Decency. Also, all the lies we’ve been forced to swallow about homos have led to a culture of lies where truth has become as murky as biological sex in a gender studies program. And so, the responsible thing is for us to speak truth to Jewish power, black power, and homo power. We need to bust their bubbles.
After all, they initially gained power by pricking the bubbles of white lies, hypocrisy, and betrayal of principles. White Americans said the US is about equality of man and rule of law. But slavery gave lie to such an ideal. And white gentiles said US is about opportunity based on merit. But there were quotas against Jews in elite colleges. And traditional society and even psychology used to insist that homosexuality is a mental disease when, in fact, some people are naturally born with such deviant orientation.

So, the needles that pricked the false balloons in the past had value in advancing the truth. But that was then, this is now. We now live in a world where Jews themselves use quotas to favor their own kind over others in elite colleges. Also, Jewish power isn’t only about merit but (1) tribal and race-ist networking a (2) use of Jew Taboo to silence dissent and (3) White Submissivism that has made whites feel that they must deny their own identity and interests in favor of Jewish identity and interests. And blacks are out of control as criminals and thugs in so many communities. Jim Crow is ancient history in an America where black thuggery is not only tolerated but worshiped as ‘cool’, especially in the Rap realm. And homos, with the backing of Jewish Power, replaced Christianity with Homomania or Queertianity as the neo-religion of the West.

In other words, Jewish power, black power, and homo power have now reached a point that exceeds the bounds of merit. Jews did gain much by meritocracy, but once they got the power, they used the Shoah Narrative to browbeat any prospective critic of Jewish Power and to implement any scheme, no matter how ugly and demented, to further Jewish supremacism. The sight of tiny little Israel creates the false impression that Jews are merely worried about the security and survival of that tiny little state. In fact, the main obsession of Jews isn’t Israel but the Empire of Judea, of which Israel is the Temple, NY is the bank, LA is the myth factory, Las Vegas is the cash cow, and Pentagon is the hammer. The Empire of Judea has tentacles all over the globe though, of course, Jews project their octopus-like nature on others, currently on Putin.

As for blacks, they are no longer in the age of TO KILL A MOCKINGBIRD. Indeed, assigning school children with the book MANDINGO would be closer to the mark of where we are. Civil Rights Era is long gone. Blacks are in thug and beast mode. They feel arrogance and contempt toward other races. (But there is a GROUNDHOG DAY mentality that always resets the clock to the twilight of the Jim Crow. We are stuck in the conundrum of TO KILL A GROUNDHOG.)
And millions and millions of black Africans now believe that the West and white world exist only to serve and put out to blacks, not least because the world has become saturated with Hollywood images of noble blacks bestowing wisdom and coolness on the pale and vapid white race that can only be redeemed by Jewish genius, Negro cool, and homo radiance.

This is sheer cultishness and very dangerous because Jews, Negroes, and homos are now very powerful, albeit in different areas for different reasons. And this may prove to be even a bigger problem for EU. If whites everywhere are supposed to revere and worship blacks and if millions of black Africans wash ashore in Europe and cause so many troubles, are white people supposed to shut up and just keep praising blacks to high heaven? How is that any different from how Germans behaved during WWII? Instead of needling Hitler’s megalomania, too many Germans worshiped him and served him loyally to the end that saw the total ruination of Germany. Even though Diversity is sold as redemption for ‘white supremacism’ and ‘racism’, it has the same logic as the lunacy that engulfed Nazi Germany. It has Taboos and Sacraments that cannot be questioned despite all the facts to the contrary.
It’s a fact that blacks are tougher, more aggressive, and less intelligent. They are more psychopathic. Too many of them will destroy white manhood, and when white manhood goes, so does white womanhood as white women will become infected with jungle fever. And then, as Europe gets overtaken by wild black junglemen, it will be the fall of the West. But this truth cannot be spoken because it’s... uh... ‘racist’! We are supposed to tremble with fear before that bogus PC term that is meant to have the effect of ‘bad doggy’!

We need to speak the truth. It is time for needles. We need to prick the balloons of Jewish supremacism, black supremacism, and homo supremacism. These balloons are protected from the needles of truth by the iron fist of deep state, Jewish financial blackmail, the police that is controlled by ZOG, and Antifa Janissary(that is protected by the police).
The balloons are well-protected, but nothing can be completely protected. Just like Michael Corleone found a way to get Sollozzo and Captain McClusky in THE GODFATHER and Hyman Roth in THE GODFATHER PART 2, there are smart ways to use the needle against balloons. And then, it will be GOOOOAAAAAAL.