Surest Way to Undermine Authority Is to Expose the Hypocrisy, but Only Those with the Power of Megaphone Get to Decide Which Hypocrisy to Target — Jews Destroyed White Authority by Exposing White Hypocrisy and Fear that Their Own Hypocrisy Will Be Exposed in Turn, and so They Censor Like Crazy

History shows that exposing hypocrisy is the surest way to pull the rug out from under the authority of those who command the dogma/narrative. When are children most likely to respect for parents, teachers, 'heroes', or authority figures? It's not when they realize the adults are imperfect(as everyone is) but when they realize certain adults are full of BS who say one thing but do another. This is why it's especially damaging when a reverend is caught in a sexual or financial scandal. Because spiritual leaders spout high-and-mighty about virtue and morality, their reputations shrivel when they are caught with pants down or hand in the cookie jar.

What was the main reason for the fall of White Authority & Power in the West? As the Christian-Humanist-Enlightenment West was confidently moralistic, righteous, and even holier-than-thou — "God is on our side", "White Man's Burden", "Human Rights", "beacon of liberty", etc — , it was especially vulnerable to exposure of hypocrisy. An amoral power like that of Vikings, Huns, or Mongols had no use for righteousness, but Western Power rose not only with guns and gold but with the Good Book and the Idea of Progress. Christianity was especially vulnerable to accusations of hypocrisy because it is so purist in its moralism; after all, Jesus even said "Turn the other cheek" and "Love thy enemy."
As long as the West guarded its Narrative and Agenda from accusations of hypocrisy, they had the authority, self-respect, and even the respect of their subject peoples(who, despite their resentment against Western Imperialism, were eager to learn from the superior and more advanced white civilizations and gain approval from them). Sure, some critical whites noticed the hypocrisy from within, but their mostly constructive criticism and relatively mild rebuke led to reforms and progress that served as the basis for yet more moral pride: "We are not perfect, we made mistakes, but we work hard to make progress and improve things." This is why, for the first 100 yrs after the Civil War, America was not particularly burdened with guilt over slavery. The favored white narrative was, "Slavery was wrong, but WE white Americans fought a war to end it." As long as whites held the megaphone, they could direct people's attention to the ultimate redemption of Western Civilization and White Folks via progress and reform, thus emphasizing pride over shame/guilt. As a result, the element of White Hypocrisy was muted.

But then, Jews took over the megaphone, and one of their main methods of undermining White Authority was by exposing white hypocrisy and making it the central theme of Western History. So, at every turn, Jews condemned whites/Christians for having preached one thing while practicing another. If whites-in-power had argued that their world wasn't perfect but nevertheless enacted reforms and furthered progress, a point of pride, Jews emphasized the shame and guilt of white failures to practice what they preached. As such, Jewish Logic insisted whites no longer deserved moral authority, and if whites were to gain a measure of redemption, they had to surrender to the newly ascendant moral authority of Jews(and their allies, mainly blacks and homos) with the power of judge-and-jury to outline what whites must do in order to be rehabilitated: Total rejection of white identity & interests, even to the point where "It's Okay to be White" is denounced as 'white supremacist', blind faith in Diversity designed to turn white nations into white-minority nations, worship of Shoah as neo-religion, Afro-mania, Globo-Homomania, and total support for Zion & Wars for Israel.

As ALL orders(and individuals) are hypocritical to some extent — practice almost always never matches principles or theory — , the real issue is NOT "Who is or isn't hypocritical?"; rather, it is "Who owns the megaphone that directs our attention to a particular hypocrisy?" When white power wielded the megaphone, it decided who were or weren't hypocritical, but when the megaphone was yielded to Jews, the Jews got to select and pass judgement. And whites were vulnerable especially in the 20th century because of World War I and World War II(and the Shoah). Prior to such cataclysms, despite setbacks and failures, it seemed as though the West was making great advances on all fronts and at all times, industrial and moral. Enlightenment and People Power seemed to be creating a better and happier world. Yet, in WWI and especially WWII, all the themes of progress — populist passions, mass communications, science and technology, social engineering, etc — all converged into a total catastrophe. Once Christian moralism faded among whites, it was replaced by secular Pride of Progress, but even that failed for White Authority in the horrible events of the 20th century.
That said, if white power had tenaciously clung to the megaphone regardless, its pride might have survived intact. After all, the Chinese Communist Party has much to answer for, but as it has always controlled the megaphone, the main theme of Chinese politics is not the hypocritical discrepancy between what the CCP promised and what it delivered in terms of Maoism and then capitalism. Maoism was an utter disaster, and capitalism is hardly what a communist party should be practicing, and these are Easy Hypocrisies that could be exposed to undermine CCP authority, but not many talk about such in China because the megaphone of the CCP is about patriotism and unity and reversing "100 yrs of humiliation".

What do Jews fear most? They know from recent history what undermined white authority, not least because of their crucial role in it. It was by exposing White Hypocrisy, thus denuding whites of respect and awe that they once held in the world. Jewish Judgement made whites lose their 'innocence' like Adam and Eve who suddenly realize they are naked.
But, what was an effective weapon against whites can be an effective weapon against Jews. As long as Jews control the megaphone, they need not worry much since most people aren't independent thinkers and just go along with the prescribed narrative and the general hype. As control of media and academia is very expensive, it was easy for super-rich Jews to maintain a near-monopoly over the Narrative. But the internet changed the playing field, and there were suddenly many voices, from left and right, that began to expose Jewish Hypocrisy. And in this, the Shoah increasingly became an Achilles Heel for Jews. It was with the Shoah Narrative that Jews made themselves out to be a saintly victim race that wouldn't hurt a fly, no more than Norman Bates's mother could. Rather, we were told that the Shoah was the final culmination of goy madness that had irrationally targeted Jews in perpetuity for all the problems of the world when, if anything, no people were as innocent and decent as the Jews.

People become more vulnerable to accusations of hypocrisy if they elevate themselves as high-and-mighty moral arbiters for all humanity, and Jews did just that with the Shoah Narrative. And this made Jewish Hypocrisy a real problem because it isn't difficult to point to all the bad things Jews have done over the ages and are doing now. While a miniphone is no match for a megaphone, when there are so many miniphones on the internet exposing Jewish Hypocrisy on Twitter, Facebook, Youtube, and etc., all those voices add up to something like a counter-megaphone. It's like enough mosquitoes can drive a man crazy. And this is why Jewish Power is so hellbent on using their ethno-monopoly over internet platforms to shut down as many voices as possible because they know full well that the very thing that brought down white authority can bring down Jewish authority in turn.

Authority is key because wealth and privilege are not enough. Even now, white gentiles have the bulk of the wealth in the US, but they totally lack authority. Even grubby non-whites who just got off the boat feel emboldened to spit on whitey as indeed many Hindus do. Blacks are poorer than whites, but they have great moral authority due to the prevailing narrative pushed by the Jewish megaphone. Currently, Jewish Power is rife with hypocrisies of all kinds. Jews talk of equality but are the most unequal people. Jews talk of the evil of 'hate', but they run Hollywood that makes hateful movies about the Other, especially Muslims and Russians. Jews talk about the dangers of misogyny, but they control porn and made billions from rap music where women are 'bitchass hos'. Jews bitch about atavistic nationalism, but they demand that we all support Israel, the Jewish homeland. Jews call for War on Terror, but they've been working with terrorists against Assad of Syria. They say we must remember the Shoah, but radical Jews played a key role in mass killings in the 20th century. Jews berate Russia for all sorts of bad behavior, but the reason why a man like Vladimir Putin came to power is because of Jewish oligarchic malfeasance in the 90s. And so on and on.

All we need to do is pull on the string of Jewish Hypocrisy, and Jewish Authority could come apart at the seams and unravel. Jews could have all the wealth in the world, but without the element of authority, they would lose respect/reverence, and then they would be an easy target of criticism and rebuke. And that's why there is growing censorship or censchwarship on internet platforms.
But for how long can Jews hold out against accusations of wanton hypocrisy, which has paradoxically gotten worse precisely because of Jewish suppression of criticism of Jews. Without healthy criticism and debate, a power grows even more corrupt and vile, and then there is even greater hypocritical distance between what it preaches and what it practices. Shielded from criticism, Jewish Power has grown more obnoxious and foul, making its hypocrisy worse, thereby requiring more suppression, which only compounds Jewish vileness even more in a vicious cycle. But I'm sure Jews will remind us that they are for 'free speech, not hate speech', what with 'hate' being defined by themselves. AIPAC's call for more 'genocide' of Palestinians apparently isn't 'hate'.

Afro-Colonization of White Wombs(ACOWW) has been facilitated by White Achievements and Power of Electricity and Electronica as Magnifiers and Amplifiers of Black Prowess

Many nationalists blame the rise of feminism as the main cause of West's downfall.

Feminism is a big problem, but it alone can't do much harm. After all, prior to mass immigration-invasion, feminism was just a headache in Sweden, not an 'existential' matter. Feminism or no feminism, the real threat to the white race is due to biological differences among the races, especially between whites and blacks.

After all, the white underclass is hardly intellectual/ideological or into stuff like 'feminist' Critical Theory. Most never came across academic tracts on anything. But we see more and more 'white trash' women breeding with black men than with white men... which only adds to white male depression and White Death, esp as white-have-nots have no leadership or guidance from white elites. If anything, they are condemned for 'white privilege' by the white elites who hog the real privilege(by cucking out to Jewish overlords). White elites ameliorate the burden of 'white guilt' by fancy displays of virtue-signaling. Look how far Tom Brokaw, Bill Clinton, Joe Biden, and their ilk got by mixing privilege/success with self-serving displays of 'conscience' that dumps most of the burden of 'white privilege' on Joe Sixpack.

Even anti-white-ness per se may not be the main threat to the White Race. After all, white women are not attracted to American Indians -- legit 'victims' of US history -- despite the Narrative that morally advantages Indians over whites. So, even if white men are accused of 'genocide' against the Noble Red Man, the fact is most white women will not run into the arms of Red Man. And no matter how much we hear about the mistreatment of Chinese railroad workers, white women will not have 'yellow fever' for yellow gorks.

The real problem is electronica and Afro-funkery.

Paradoxically, the greatest achievement and strength of a people can end up serving the power of another people. It's like the roads built by Romans. They were meant to expand Roman power and domination. But in the end, it made the invasion of Rome much easier because the barbarians could use those very pathways to march toward Rome to sack it. So, what the Romans built to ensure their domination over others facilitated the domination by others over Romans. Rome ended up being 'host' to invaders. It's like a dog's mobility is a great advantage, but it also enables the spread of parasites much more effectively. Dog's speed allow dogs to hunt and run from danger. But it also means dogs will run all around and spread fleas and ticks to other dogs and mammals. Dogs unwittingly serve as the hosts and carriers of the very creatures that feed on them. It's like the Alien creature in Ridley Scott's movie uses humans as host-carriers of their eggs.

Prior to white development of mass travel, mass communication, and electronic media, blacks were nothing more than oogity-boogity primitives in their own world. Though physically powerful and aggressive, they lacked the intellect and temperament to develop the kind of technology necessary for world domination. They mostly chucked spears at hippos and then yelled "run like a mothafuc*a". They beat on bongo drums and shook their booties and told folktales about how someone's grandma was an antelope. So, no matter how physically powerful and wild they were, they were stuck in their own little worlds and meant nothing to the rest of The World.

So, how did Afromania spread(indeed, even before homomania)? It was due to white achievements in electricity and electronica. Electricity allows the development of electronica, the gadgets, especially of media and entertainment, that AMPLIFY and MAGNIFY human expression, showmanship, and prowess. Before electronica, it took an entire orchestra or a big chorus to make loud sounds. With electronica, a skinny Mexican like Carlos Santana or dufusy Briton like Jimmy Page could create thunder with a single guitar on par with Wagner's operas. Rock music wasn't possible without electricity. Prior to electronica, black music could be loud and raucous but its reach was limited to a saloon or hall. But when bluesmen went electric, they sounded 1000x more powerful.
Even without electronica, people could express themselves powerfully, but the impact was limited. Electronica amplified the power of expression 100x and transmitted images and sounds to millions and even billions of people, especially via satellite technology.

Now, blacks had NOTHING to do with modern science. White folks did it all, just about. Even non-white achievements by Japanese were micro-improvements on white macro-paradigms. So, the power of electricity and electronica developed as achievements of white power to serve white power.
The problem is the power of electricity and electronica came to favor the expressions of another people, even ones that posed harm to the very people who developed the technologies.
It's like Japanese companies like Sony and Toshiba made lots and lots of TV sets and sold them around the world. So, did Japanese TV's spread Japanese culture and prestige? No, for the most part, what people around the world watched on those Japanese-made TV sets were Hollywood and American culture. So, if Japan sold 100 million TV sets, they did little to spread Japanese racial or cultural prestige or enhance Japan's soft power. What really mattered was what was broadcast on TV, and it was mostly American sports and entertainment and movies and music. Japanese provided the hardware but not the idols for global consumption.

So, all those Japanese TV's were really serving the American Sound and Image.
In the end, who prints books is less significant than who provides the ideas and images conveyed on the pages of books and magazines.
I mean a person in some part of the world with a Sony TV does NOT think when watching a movie, "I'm watching a TV set made by Sony. Gee, those Japanese make good TV's. Good workmanship. Nice technology." No, he ignores all that and just gets excited about what is coming through the Tube, which is far more likely a Hollywood product than a Japanese movie or TV show. If Jews were to make all the TV sets but if Palestinians were to make all the TV shows, which side would gain the advantage? Will people show more appreciation to the fact that Jews made the TV sets OR will they show more appreciation to the programs created by Palestinians?

So, when white folks feel assured of their power because so much of Human Achievement was the result of white genius, white brilliance, and white innovation, they are not seeing the bigger picture. Much of white achievements in technology is merely useful and convenient. People don't pay attention to the technology itself but what it can deliver or convey. How many people know what really goes into a TV, smartphone, computer, internet, or video game in terms of technology and programming? They just like the sight-and-sound, the fun stuff relayed by such technologies. Thus, so much of white genius and white-human-achievement goes undetected and remains invisible. When people flush the toilet, they don't think of the important historical figure who came up with modern plumbing and sewage system.
People are still organisms, and most organismic needs are basic and functional. People do them because they must. It's like taking a urine, taking a dump, drinking water, getting some sleep, cleaning and bathing, and etc. People do them not because they want to but because they must. They're about bodily functions.
What people fixate most on are things of pleasure. Not just any food but sugary-creamy food. Music and dance, related to sex culture, as music and sexuality light up same parts of the brain. And human organisms still have that warrior-hunter instinct, which is why people, esp men, still love sports and action movies and video games.

As for culture, elitist high art has no chance against pop culture. Elite culture had prestige when the world was ruled by aristocrats with fancy airs. They were patrons of high art. Also, the power of religion emphasized themes of grace, dignity, transcendence, and redemption over ones of wantonness, excess, vulgarity, and shamelessness. For most of human history, most people had humble folk culture and family lore. Elites had high culture. But in the democratized world of mass consumption, pop culture is the only dominant culture, and it is driven by profits derived from catering to 'base' animalistic drives of masses of human organisms.

White people developed the power of electricity and invented electronica on a massive scale. Today, even tribesmen in Africa have smartphones that connect with all the world. Since white folks developed the technology and since East Asian nations make a lot of these gadgets, one would think the power of electricity/electronica would favor whites above all and Asians second. But, the controllers of much of globalist media and entertainment are Jews who generally happen to have their own ethno-organismic interests that tend to be hostile especially toward white gentiles(but also against Muslims and Asians). So, movies like GET OUT, DJANGO UNCHAINED, and 12 YEARS A SLAVE are financed by them(but nothing about the Nakba Pogroms that wiped Palestine off the map).

Also, in our culture of shameless thuggery and lasciviousness, blacks have a decisive advantage in entertainments with greatest reach for masses around the world: Pop music, sports, vulgar comedy, pornography, increasingly sexualized dance forms, and art of hollering(like in rap battles, though when used well, it can lead to impressive oratory, as with MLK).
Blacks always had these traits, but they were contained in Africa. Someone in Mexico, India, China, Turkey, Iran, or Hungary wouldn't have known about black volume or virility prior to mass electronic communication. But with the spread of electronic networks all around the world, blackness in sports, music, dance, sex, and hollering has spread all over. And this is leading to a kind of Afro-mono-culture. Now, global electronic networks can, theoretically or ideally, spread all sorts of cultures and expressions around the world. And this spirit does exist in the Art Film Community where people still show interest in different works from around the world. But these films make minuscule amount of money. Look at any Variety box office charts, and it's rare for a foreign or indie film to make more than $100,000 at box office in the US, no matter how good the film is. Most indie or foreign films make much less than even that.
Especially in a world culture that is increasingly shameless, infantile, savage, and vulgar, people don't have patience or interest in anything except that which gives them a quick fix or high, like crack or smack. Also, sports is a zero-sum game. People only care about top winners and no one else. Blacks dominate sports because they got more fast-twitch muscles, making them quicker and more explosive. Also, blacks have tougher bones and faster reflexes. Evolution made for racial differences in physical advantages. Since blacks are most wild and dominant in the culture of mass thrills -- even coming up with a dance called 'twerking' -- , World Culture is going Afromaniacal. Long ago, French pop music was unique. While it borrowed elements from other musical styles, it maintained a distinctive Frenchness. But go on youtube and check the top 10 hits of France last year, and it's just French version of Afro-funkery and rap. And look at the French soccer team. Almost all black.

This means that the most advanced part of the world, the West, has done most to promote and disseminate the attitudes and (lack of)manners of the most primitive, aggressive, and troublesome race on earth, the blacks, whose racial nature has made a total mess of Africa, Haiti, Detroit, parts of Baltimore, and etc. Whites built computers and the internet. Blacks had nothing to do with it. But black expressions are spread to all corners of the world via the internet.

http://www.ozy.com/fast-forward/how-hip-hop-is-fueling-feminism-in-an-unlikely-place/77095?utm

Afromania may be sold as 'diversity', 'feminism', 'progress', or 'tolerance', but it is really Afro-colonization of the world via the CARRIER of white technology. Even though technology was created by high intellect, great discipline, and much learning, their purpose is to make things easier and simpler for most people. Initially, technology was to ensure better survival and production of basic goods like automobiles and laundry machines. They were not about pleasure but necessity and convenience. But once people's basic needs were met, they relied on technology more and more for pleasure, especially with the rise of youth culture in the 50s and 60s when hedonism became the main mode, even to the point of infecting leftism, whereby May 68 in France was ignited by French male students being angry for lack of easy sexual access to coeds.

The masses find most pleasure in sports as form of neo-tribalism, pop music, dance as horny expression, comedy & culture of vulgarity, pornography & other forms of sex culture, and narcissism & celebrity(to the point that even fat homely Lena Dunham imposes herself on us as 'hot stuff), and etc. And blacks have gained dominance in many of those. And because US media have global reach and because internet interconnects all the world, it means Euro-power in electricity and electronica have come to serve as midwife to and carrier of savage Afromania. And this may be a destructive force, not least because modern technology not only allows mass communication but mass travel. In the 50s and 60s, white Britons may have listened to black music and drawn inspiration, but most black Africans had little chance of making it to UK. Also, there were far fewer blacks back then in Africa. But modern medicine and food vastly increased black population in Africa. Also, air travel is now cheap enough that any well-off African can fly to any part of the world. Also, the breakdown of borders and loopy redefinition of 'western values' mean that Africans can willfully endanger themselves at sea to be dragged into Europe, whereupon they can trek from Italy or Spain to northern parts of Europe. And since the 80s, European women have been dosed on madonna-ism, the ideal of white ho having orgy with the entire NBA. This leads to the Afro-Colonization of White Wombs or ACOWW. And if you have trepidation about any of that, all of EU, from top to bottom, have been mentally-colonized to condemn you as 'racist'. A people who are only territorially conquered can still survive as a race. Poles and Kurds had been conquered this way, but as most of their women had children for their own men, the people and culture survived. But when the women of a race are womb-colonized by another people, it leads to something like mestizo-ization. The Hispanic colonization of native wombs in Latin America forever destroyed the identity and pride of Meso-Americans who still linger as strangers in their own land, or strangers in a familiar land.

At the current rate, the white race is going from boomers to doomers. Not only do more and more white women invite their wombs to be colonized by black men but white men, as sappy cucks, have embraced their own inferiority and fitfully virtue-signal their 'anti-racism' of having accepted the black man as the 'better man' who's more deserving of possessing and enjoying white female beauty. Paradoxically, white 'progressives' who rhetorically reject the notion of racial differences actively behave in ways that are premised on racial differences. After all, why would white women go with black men unless they believed black men are superior as savage-warrior-hunter-studs over sappy white loser males? And why would white males seek comfort and compensation in Asian women? It's because they are losing white women to black men.

Will Trans-Professionalism be the Next Big Craze after Trans-genderism?

Will we have trans-professionals?

I think I'm a lawyer, therefore I am one.

I think I'm a doctor, therefore I am one.

I think I'm a sign-language interpreter, therefore I am one.

(There was alarm about the potential security threat posed by the bogus interpreter at Nelson Mandela's funeral upon World Leaders, but aren't 'world leaders' themselves really just a bunch of fakers who do the bidding of their globalist masters? I mean, did Obama really want to destroy Libya? Was it really his personal decision? Or was he ordered to take out Gaddafi? Maybe it's time to call 'world leaders' by their proper name: Globalist Puppets.)

All identities are breaking down under globalism.

Who is a woman? A man with a wig.

Who is an American?  An illegal.

Who is a patriot?  A globalist.

Who is a moralist?  A homomaniac.

Who is a poet? A rapper.

Who is a doctor? A chiropractor.

Who is a lady? A slut.

Who is a parent? A homo pretending to have had the kid.

What is free speech? Shutting down 'hate speech'.

The real shame is that even professionals are acting fake.
If US journalism has genuinely high standards, I would support its concern over Fake News.  There are lots of fake stuff on the internet, and amateurism is no substitute for professionalism. But the 2016 election coverage revealed how low the standards of journalism have come in this country.  Too many, possibly even the majority, of professional journalists are shills, whores, propagandists, partisans, liars, and genuine kooks, like Kurt Eichenwald.

Anne Appleabaum's once wrote a sober piece about dangers of amateurism and wikipedia. I thought it was a good piece and a necessary one.

https://www.aei.org/publication/the-blog-of-war/

Especially with the rise of the internet, categories are breaking down. Prior to the internet, the term 'film critic' or literary critic' used to mean critics with professional pedigree and credentials. Now, it means just about anyone with an opinion and a blog, podcast, or youtube channel.  So, anyone gabbing endlessly about Hollywood blockbusters or anyone yammering about the latest teen fiction is a 'critic'. There are also tons of amateur historians, amateur philosophers, amateur everything muscling in on those with real professional credentials. The internet has made all these people possible.

But people like Applebaum haven't done their professions much credit by shilling for the Deep State, pushing US propaganda, favoring tribal interests, and pursuing political agendas at the expense of academic standards. Applebaum is clearly a Jewish supremacist not unlike Jennifer Rubin committed to doing her part to game the global system to favor Jewish interests over the national interests of gentiles. So, even though her cautionary piece on amateurism was valid in and of itself, her own behavior and violation of professional ethics have, in action and deed, been a disservice to her own thesis.

One advantage of amateurism, despite deficiency of professional training and production values, is the relative freedom and lack of restraint. This was the advantage of the French New Wave over the French film industry, French cultural scene(that was heavily slanted to the communist left), and Hollywood studio domination. French New Wave directors had less means but more freedom and room for personal expression. They made up with originality, creativity, and vision what they lacked in materials, craftsmanship, and funds.

It’s Time to Name the Real Culprit in the Banning of Alex Jones and Infowars from the Major Platforms — It is Time to Name You-Know-Who, or Yonuhu’s — Yes, JEWS are behind the Great Purge of Patriotism

On the Ethno-Gentrification of the Media. Those who ethnically cleansed the Palestinians, looted the Russian economy, destroyed Western borders, and laid waste to Iraq-Libya-Syria are now INFO-CLEANSING the Internet. Should the 2% be gatekeepers of news and info for 98% of Americans who are goy? Tribal Oligarchs as corrupt referees calling foul on anyone who warns of the rigged system owned by the Deep State. We need to expose how the 2% control 95% of media in the US. Expose Jewish supremacist power and privilege.

If the Tribe treats White People this way, is there any reason why white folks should support Israel? When Jews treat you like Palestinians, have the decency to side with Palestinians and join with BDS. After all, what do Palestinians and Hungarians(or Poles or any white majority population) have in common? Both are targeted for destruction by the Globalists.

As all of you surely heard, Alex Jones and Inforwars have been simultaneously banned by Youtube, Facebook, Apple, Spotify, Pinterest, and few other monopolistic platforms. According to these firms, Alex Jones’s channel had to go because of ‘hate speech’, something vaguely decided by the Powers-That-Be. ‘Hate Speech’, like ‘Obscenity’, can be stretched to mean just about anything. Also, the Powers-that-be protect and even promote certain kinds of hatred while suppressing other kinds. Worse, they defame speech they don’t like as ‘hate’ just to shut it down. Censorship of Alex Jones is pushed by the Corporate Media, but it’s in concert with the State and institutions such as academia and law firms. And if there is any connective thread linking all these private and public entities, it is the not-so-hidden-hand of Jewish supremacist Power. People don’t like to Name the Jew either out of fear or slavish devotion to anything Jewish(as the result of indoctrination since childhood of how Jews are so wonderful, wise, holy, and lovable, with the corollary that anyone who is critical of Jews or Israel must be a ‘rabid and virulent antisemitic Nazi’). So perhaps, it’s useful to refer to Jews as You-Know-Who’s or Yunohu’s.

After all, due to the sheer immensity of Jewish Power, even slavish philo-semites must know, on some level, that Jews as the unnameable you-know-who’s are pulling the strings from behind the scenes. At this point, it’s no secret that George Soros and his ilk have been behind many agendas so harmful to whites and other non-Jews around the world. But it’s taboo to Name the Jew that the critics of Soros feel obligated to emphasize that he must be an ‘anti-Semite’ because, as a boy, he collaborated with the Nazis who rounded up Jews. But as a boy, Soros was only trying to survive, and he wasn’t the ONLY Jew who acted thus to save his own skin. People collaborate in a climate of fear. Indeed, look at white Americans who collaborate with Jewish supremacists even though the latter is waging war on White America and White Europe because they don’t want to be destroyed in career and livelihood. If white Americans who are not threatened at gunpoint so cravenly collaborate with Jewish globo-homo supremacists, we can understand why the young Soros collaborated with Nazis to save his own skin. People are not angels or saints. They are all-too-human, for better or worse. The problem of Soros is not that he once served the Nazis. Rather, he is all too typical of others of his tribe on both the ‘left’ and ‘right’. Notice that Neocon Jews hardly ever attack Soros. If anything, their agenda is closer to Soros-ism than American Nationalism. Jews of all stripes are generally supportive of Jewish globalist hegemony, and nearly all of them are virulently hostile to any sign of non-Jewish identity and national interests. They see goy national identity-interests as obstacles to Globo-Homo Pax Judeana.

Imperialists generally hate all nationalisms except their own. The British Imperialists guarded their own racial identity and national interests BUT suppressed the nationalist aspirations of their subject peoples for independence and autonomy. Today, the Jewish-Power-Network rules the world via connections from LA to Chicago to NY to Boston to London to Paris to Berlin to Warsaw to Moscow. Yes, Jews are so powerful that even Russia, the main target of Jewish hostility, must praise and protect Jews. Jews suffer no consequences for spewing hatred against others. Even their victims feel compelled to praise and honor Jews because the World Economy is so dominated by Jewish Power. Jews not only want to maintain the current hegemony but expand it further. Jews do this by using ‘free trade’ to suck all the world into the US-dominated trade zone. Jews do it by promoting Homomania and Afromania. Via Homomania, Jews recruit homos in every nation to do the bidding of Jews. Also, by making all the world revere and serve the homo minority, Jews encourage an attitude among all goyim that minority must be favored over the majority. As Jews are minorities in all nations except in Israel, you can see how this is good for Jews. Also, Homomania isn’t just a cause for ‘gay rights’ but a proselytization of Gay Rites as the new globo-faith. It is supposed to supplant Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, and etc. If Jews can’t exactly get rid of those religions, they seek to associate them with homo symbols. In the Old Soviet Union, Jewish Bolsheviks physically destroyed churches. In the 21st century, Jewish Corporate Trotskyites seek the desecrate and destroy the souls of every religion by associating them with Homo-Worship. When Christians are led to believe that Jesus died for the glory of men doing fecal penetration on each other or going to a doctor to have his penis and balls removed for a fake ‘vagina’, you know it’s a soul-sick or dead religion. Or imagine Buddhists being convinced that, after a long meditation, Siddhartha’s great revelation is that a penis in the anus is holy. Or imagine Muslims being led to believe that Muhammad, the last and greatest prophet(according to the faithful), had a message for all mankind, and it is ‘Bruce Jenner is really a woman’. When religions are homomaniacked, they wilt and die. They turn into a farce, and Faith cannot survive as a joke.
Jews also spread Afromania to undermine national cultures. Why are blacks so effective in this? It’s because they easily beat other races in sports, make funky music, and have bouncier butts and bigger dongs. So, when a nation takes in just a few blacks, they take over the sports and become revered as the new idols of national heroism. Blacks are 5% of the French population but dominate sports, and so, the white French now look to blacks as the face of French manhood and glory. French manhood is finished and cucked. Also, black music, being so sexual and wild, turn kids around the world into jungle junkies who main cultural obsession is imitating rappers. And because black booty is at the center of this, all cultures are ‘twerkized’. Civilizations rose by suppressing the energies of the groins and buttocks and by emphasizing the hands(makers of things), heart(empathy and depth), and brains(reason and logic). But with the spread of Afromania, all the world is turned onto jungle jivery that is controlled by Jewish music industry moguls, sports franchise oligarchs, and porn-meisters. Also, with the spread of Afromania, women around the world are turned onto jungle fever, and they come to lose respect for their own men as inferior. We see this with the rise of cuckery especially in the West. Cuck-culture is about white males accepting their submissive role as weak and wussy ‘white boys’ vis-a-vis the Real Manhood of black men who are now deemed to be most deserving of ‘white pussy’. That is our culture, like it or not, and Jews spread this template all around the world. (Granted, Afromania may destroy Jewish power also because too many Jewish girls, especially half-Jewish ones born of ‘shikse’ mothers, also have jungle fever now and reject Jewish men as dorks and wimps.)

Anyway, Jews have the Real Power in America and that means around the world as well because the US is the lone superpower. Or, to be more accurate, there is a power even greater than that of America, and it is the Empire of Judea, or EOJ. The Jewish globo-power-network is the most powerful force in the world, and the US is a part of that empire. However, the US is prized by Jews because it is their Jewel in the Crown. The US is the only sound foundation of Jewish Power. Even though Jewish power is extensive in some European nations, it is nothing like the Jewish stranglehold on America. Also, even if Jewish power dominated ONLY America, it would still be the greatest power in the world because the US, even on its own, is the lone superpower.
In the end, imperial power is always precarious because it’s about minority rule over much of the world. The Romans were powerful as long as they could instill fear in their non-Roman subjects. But once the fear dissipated, the empire was bound to fall almost overnight. The British Empire was gigantic and mighty, but it was about small numbers of Brits lording over vast numbers of non-whites around the world. If the latter were to rouse up with a sense of nationalist identity and interests, British Empire found itself skating on thin ice. As powerful as the US is around the world with its military and financial power, its hegemony is not a sure or permanent thing. The US must constantly use a combination of carrots and sticks to make the world comply with US demands, which have become synonymous with Jewish supremacist and Zionist agendas. This is why Jews prize their hold over the US above all things. If Jewish hegemony fails around the world, the Jews can always say, "Well, we got the US" and retreat to their primary power center. And having the US as lone superpower, it can always exert pressure on other nations, even ones that resent and hate the US.

Jews must suppress American Nationalism because it prioritizes what is good for All Americans than what is good for Jews around the world. American Jews don’t primarily identify with fellow Americans. They feel far closer to other Jews around the world than with goyim in the US. Just like the British in India felt closer to the British in Africa and vice versa than with Indians or Africans, Jews in the US feel closer to Jews in UK, France, Germany, Poland, Russia, Israel, and etc. than with non-Jewish Americans. As far as Jews are concerned, goyim exist mainly to listen to Jews, obey Jews, revere Jews, and serve Jews. When a bunch of people on horseback gather together, do they feel closer to one another as fellow humans or do they feel closer to the horses they are sitting on? Of course, the real connection is human-to-human, with the humans regarding horses merely as creatures that exist to serve humans. Likewise, Jews all over the world see non-Jews as horses to ride. Jews in the US ride the biggest and strongest horse, and American Jewish riders help Jews in other nations to ride the goyim there like horses too.

Riders and Horses. It's like Jewish globo-masters and their Goy cuck-collaborators.

American Jewish advisers in Russia of the 1990s aided Russian Jews on how to saddle the Russian goy horse and ride it ragged. Jews abused the Russian horse so badly that Putin reversed the Jewish rough-riding somewhat and unhorsed the worst of the Jewish oligarchs, and he’s been appreciated by the Russian people for restoring some measure of nationalism. But even Russia is not fully independent because of so much of Russian economy is dependent on foreign commerce controlled by the US that is controlled by Jews.

Anyway, it is time that we admitted the facts as to why Alex Jones got banned from the major platforms. We must name the you-know-who or yonuhu. It’s the Jews. Come on, it’s the Jews. Who owns Youtube? Who owns Facebook? Who owns the biggest firms on Silicon Valley? It’s been reported that CNN and other news networks requested Facebook and Youtube to purge Infowars. Who owns CNN and Big Media? Hawaiians? Eskimos? Dumb ‘Polacks’? Japanese-Americans? Mormons? West Virginia Hillbillies? Blacks?

You Know Who, and it’s the Jew. THE REAL PRESSING CONCERN FOR ALL FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLES IS THAT THE MEDIA AND INTERNET PLATFORMS ARE CONTROLLED BY ETHNO-MONOPOLY OF JEWS WHO MAKE UP ONLY 2% OF THE POPULATION. IMAGINE ANY NATION WHERE A MINORITY THAT MAKES UP 2% GETS TO CONTROL AND MONOPOLIZE NEARLY ALL MEDIA AND PLATFORMS. IT WOULD BE CALLED IMPERIALISM! IN ORDER TO HAVE REAL CHANGE, WE NEED TO BRING ATTENTION TO THE ETHNO-MONOPOLY OF THE MEDIA. THAT SHOULD BE THE CORE ISSUE. HOW DARE THE 2% GET TO DECIDE THE RIGHTS OF SPEECH AND EXPRESSION OF THE 98%? OF COURSE, THERE ARE PLENTY OF NON-JEWS WHO SUPPORT JEWISH CENSORSHIP, BUT THAT'S BECAUSE THEY'VE BEEN BRAINWASHED BY JEWISH ETHNO-MONOPOLY OF MEDIA AND ELITE INSTITUTIONS. JUST ASK YOURSELF. IS IT HEALTHY FOR ANY SOCIETY TO ALLOW THE 2% TO HAVE MONOPOLY POWER OVER NEWS AND INFORMATION THAT AFFECTS THE 98%? CAN YOU IMAGINE ISRAEL ALLOWING A NON-JEWISH MINORITY THAT IS 2% CONTROLLING ALL THE MEDIA IN ISRAEL? JEWS ARE NOT SO STUPID. SO, WHY DO WE TOLERATE THE ETHNO-MONOPOLISTIC SITUATION IN THE US?
While it’s true that big corporations moved against the competitor-corporation of Infowars, there was an ethnic, or more precisely an ethno-monopolistic, aspect to the move against Alex Jones. This wasn’t just corporatism. It was Corporate Trotskyism. Long ago, many Jewish elites and radicals took up Marxism, and their great hero was the full-bloodied Jew Leon Trotsky, indeed even more so than Lenin(who was only 1/4 Jewish). Even when Jews soured of communism and came to see it as one big folly, they still honored Trotsky as the kind of tireless, ruthless, and relentless Jewish ball-of-fire inflamed with the Will to Power to change the entire world. To this day, Neocons revere Trotsky as a great Jewish Prophet. Jews no longer believe in communism, but they still believe in a kind of permanent revolution. It is no longer in the service of ideology but identity. To Jews, the End of History means the Beginning of the Permanent Revolution for Jewish Identity as the supreme hegemonic power around the world.

So, it’s not enough to say Big Corporations did this to Alex Jones. We must ask WHO owns and controls those corporations. Some argue that Facebook and Youtube were pressured to ban people like Alex Jones by Advertisers and it’s all about money. That is nonsense. After all, so many consumers in the US are white and Trump-supporters, so why isn’t there pressure on Youtube and Facebook from Advertisers to shut down anti-white, anti-Trump, anti-Christian, and anti-patriotic speech? No, the fact is Jews at Youtube and Facebook want to shut down the free speech of goy patriots, and they use the Advertising Issue as an excuse. Advertising, like Youtube and Facebook, is mostly controlled by Jews in the US, and what all these Jews have in common is ruthless ambition for Jewish supremacist hegemony and fear of nationalist resistance against Globalism. So, this isn’t just about corporations. It’s about the hostile ethnic supremacism of Jews in the top industries working in concert to shut down voices that challenge the Narrative pushed by guys like George Soros, Paul Singer, Michael Bloomberg, and the rest of the Tribe. We cannot understand what is really going on UNLESS we take the element of Jewish hostility into account. Youtube banned Alex Jones for the same reason Google bans any doodle for Easter. Jews feel hostility toward Christianity, and they fear the stirrings of White Independence that may eventually break free of Jewish domination like the American Revolutionaries broke free from the British Empire.
The same ethnic logic was behind the Iraq War. So many tried to explain it in terms of ‘No Blood for Oil’. But if the US really wanted to steal oil, why not invade Saudi Arabia and take its oil? Besides, Hussein was all-too-willing to do business with the West. It wasn't him who said NO to Western investment in Iraq. Rather, it was the Jewish-controlled US that forced sanctions on Iraq and made it difficult for Iraq to export oil, even to buy basic items like foodstuff and medicine. Also, even with sanctions on Iraq, the world was awash in oil, and it’s not like any nation was desperate for oil like Japan during WWII. No, the main reason for the invasion was Jews feared a united Iraq as a rival of Israel. Via invasion, Jews hoped that Iraq would become another pliable client state like Saudi Arabia, a loyal dog of the US and Israel. The protest signs should have read NO BLOOD FOR JUDEO-NAZIS.

Indeed, this is where classic Marxist theory fails. By emphasizing economic interests over ethnic identity, it believes that history is animated by mere materialist greed. Now, Marxists weren’t entirely wrong. A people can become deracinated and emotionally severed from their ethnic kin and be concerned mostly about class or moneyed interests. This can be said about many white elites who feel no sense of racial identity, pride, and solidarity with the white masses. All they care about is status, wealth, and privilege on the individual level. But even that isn’t entirely true. Because tribalism is a part of human nature, a people who reject their own identity invariably latch onto the identity of others who still maintain the pride of identity. It's like those who have no cause fill the vacuum by latching onto those who do have a cause. So, even though whites are deracinated in their whiteness, they are fervently racial in their devotion to Afromania, Jewish pride, and pro-Zionism. Hillary Clinton and Paul Ryan may have no use for whiteness, but they sure are totally gaga in their enthusiasm for all things Jewish or Zionist.

At any rate, mere economic theories don’t explain what is happening in the world. In a way, Marx and other Jews pushed an economic theory of history to mask the power of Jewish identity. After all, Jewish capitalists weren’t merely out for profits per se but for profits to bolster Jewish Power. Jewish profits were meant to serve Jewish prophecy. Jewish capitalists favored Zionism. Jewish capitalists also funded the Bolsheviks out of ethnic interests. They wanted fellow Jews, even if communist, to topple the Old Order in Russia and take over. Tribal solidarity trumped ideology or mere material interest. And when we re-examine Russia of the 90s, it wasn’t just economic forces at play. It was capitalism + Jewish identity working in tandem. So, we need a theory of Ethno-Capitalism. It is simply not true that capitalism is always about color-blind or apolitical supply-and-demand of goods and services for profits.
Now, there is much in capitalism that prioritizes profits and individual self-interest above all else. Even enemies will trade with one another for profits and mutual interest. If two nations are enemies but if one produces oil but no iron while the other produces iron but no oil, they may have to trade with one another out of sheer need. But, capitalism isn’t just about profits. Sometimes, prophecy(of ethnic ambition or national vision) trumps profits. Or, short-term profits may be sacrificed in favor of long-term profits, a kind of economic prophecy. For example, the US could have made lots of money by continuing to sell iron and oil to Japan that was then invading and occupying China. It would have been great for short-term profits. But if Japan were to dominate all Asia, it might grow into a great power and pose a threat to US ambitions for world hegemony. So, Japan was hit with the embargo. Jews feel the same way. Sure, Jews will often trade with just about anyone to make more money. But when Jews must choose between profits and prophecy, they often go with the latter because Jews believe profits must serve prophecy than vice versa. This prophecy is Jewish supremacist hegemony over the world. Sanctions against Iraq and Iran prevented many Jews from doing business there. They cut into Jewish economic opportunities. But they were deemed worthwhile because the Main Interest of Jews is to ensure Israel’s position as the only superpower in the Middle East. So, Jews were willing to choose Zionist prophecy over profits. Same goes with Russia. If sanctions against Russia were lifted, Jews in US and EU could make lots more money by doing business. But Jews regard that as short-term profit that may undermine long-term Jewish prophecy and even greater profits. A Russia that is open to business may boom economically, and that will be good for Putin. With more money, Russians will be able to fund more nationalist projects. So, Jews figure short-term profits must be sacrificed to undermine and destroy Russia with heavy sanctions. Once Russia is brought to heel, it can be taken over by Jews and their Globo-Homo cuck-collaborators. Then, not only will Jews come to own Russia like they own the US but they will be able to make even more profits.
At any rate, so much of capitalism was entwined with identity. This was no less true of Jews than with any other people. Because there was so much talk of Jews and Money, men like Marx and other Jewish communists may have favored a theory that convinced people believe that economic forces are impersonal and trans-national. And they wanted people to believe that the triumph of communism would also be impersonal and trans-national but for the sake of proletarian justice than exploitation. Indeed, it’s interesting that in their theories of both capital and labor, these Jewish radicals de-emphasized the element of identity, race, and nation. It’s possible they didn’t want us to think about Jewish role in capitalism and Jewish role in communism. Behind the ruse of universalism of greed or justice, Jews were seeking supremacist and hegemonic power.

Capitalism is not merely about profits. After all, Jews could have invested heavily in Infowars and made Jones a business partner. The fact is one can make money off just about anything. If Jews really feel that there are too many ‘deplorable white racists’ out there, Hollywood can make a killing with movies that cater to the ‘prejudices’ of ‘white rednecks’. But Hollywood doesn’t. It forgoes profiteering from such a market because their long-term prophecy of Tribal Supremacism over goyim trumps any short-term profits. In order for Jews to maintain their own supremacism, they must convince and compel whites to serve Jewish interests than their own. And the ONLY way to do this is to by paralyzing white identity and pride with the cult of ‘white guilt’. Whites must be convinced that any sign of white identity or white desire for independence from Jewish Power is ‘white supremacist’, ‘nazi’, and ‘hate’. This is why the most effective way to combat Jewish Supremacism is to state that (1) Jewish supremacism is the reigning power in the US and the world and (2) that you and your people no longer want to support this satanic Jewish-Zionist neo-Trotskyist supremacism that promotes Hate for Iran and Russia, crushes Palestinians, demeans people of European ancestry and Christians, promotes near-genocidal wars for Israel, aids & abets Wall Street and Las Vegas’ fleecing of humanity, and pushes mass migration-invasion into ALL nations except Israel in order to use Diversity as a tool for Divide-and-Rule by Jews.
Even though the prophetic end-game of Jews is to convert and enslave white goyim into permanent collaborator-and-helot race of the Jews(what the Nazis envisioned for Slavic populations upon Nazi victory), there are so many foolish whites who think a partnership of equals is possible between Jews and whites. They think, "If we scratch Jews’ back and stoke their egos, they will scratch ours and be kind to us." But while whites scratch the Jews’ back and kiss the Jews’ ass, Jews stab whites in the back and kick whites in the ass. Whites say, "We will suck your Jewish cock and swallow", and the Jews says, "Oh yeah? You do just that while we castrate your balls, cut off your dick, and replace your manhood with a fake ‘vagina’." But then, why should Jews respect whites? Whites outnumber Jews by a huge margin, BUT whites are willing to accord Jews the status of equal partnership in the Alliance? Can you imagine a society where Jews outnumber non-Jews by a huge margin but offer equal partnership between the two communities? Jews would laugh at such an idea. Imagine Jews in Israel according equal partnership to Palestinians. ROTFL.
So, Jews see the white offer of equal partnership as weakness and stupidity. Jews feel nothing but contempt for sappy white cucks. Also, precisely because Jews are outnumbered by whites, they know that an equal partnership could easily be tip in favor of the far more numerous whites as time passes. So, if Jewish power is to be assured vis-a-vis whites, they must hold the whip hand. They must have power over whites, not parity with whites. And this whip hand isn’t merely about control of money and privilege. After all, having lots of money doesn’t guarantee moral justification. The Shah of Iran was obscenely rich, but most Iranians just saw him as a greedy pig. Even now, white people have more wealth than blacks and browns, but they are only accused of ‘white privilege’, which morally invalidates white success.
In the past, Jews were generally richer than white Christians in Europe, but this only led to white accusations of Jewish greed and parasitism. So, socio-economic might alone can come under moral attack. The might has to seem righteous in order to be shielded from criticism. Without the element of the righteous, the might can only rule by bribery or fear. This is why Jews have used the double whammy of Holocaustianity and Slave Narrative to paralyze whites with ‘white guilt’ while elevating themselves to the status of The People of Six Million Messiahs Who Were Crucified in the Holocaust. This Narrative is getting more perverse by the day because there is such a naked and stark discrepancy between the venal character of most powerful Jews and the 'sacralized' image of Holy Jewish Victims of Shoah. Granted, there are some morally impressive Jews like Norman Finkelstein. Whatever one thinks of Finkelstein's overall ideology, one can't help but admire his conviction that the true lesson of the Holocaust is that Jews must act as moral exemplars, not cynical exploiters of past tragedy to further Jewish supremacist interests. Finkelstein finds it appalling that Jews invoke WWII and Shoah to justify what they’ve done to Palestinians and to wage Wars in the Middle East instigated mostly by Neocons and other power-mad Zionists.
But as it happens, Power Prophets outnumber Principle Prophets in the Jewish community. Flush with unlimited cash, power, privilege, and success, Jews are now addicted to supremacist power. According to Jewish logic, Jewish domination is as natural and necessary as the Sun rising in the East. That means anyone who opposes or rejects Jewish supremacism is ‘unpatriotic’, ‘treasonous’, and ‘hateful’. Yes, in the Current US, a white person who says that he doesn’t want to serve Jewish globo-homo supremacism and would rather serve what is good for America is a ‘hater’, ‘traitor’, and ‘white supremacist’, whereas any white American who hates his own race, calls for dissolution of borders, and champions Jewish globo-homo supremacism is the True American(or True Conservative). In short, Jews think they own the US and the world. They think humanity should obey and serve Jews. Such is the ONLY LOYALTY and ‘patriotism’ that Jews can tolerate. All goyim must be primarily ‘patriotic’ and ‘loyal’ to Jewish power. The reason why Jews hate Russia is that Russians chose Russian identity and interests over Jewish globo-homo power. According to Jewish logic, Russians who chose Russian-ness are ‘traitors’. How dare Russians favor their own kind over Jews(and Homos)! Similarly, Jews have redefined Americanism so that nothing is more ‘patriotic’ and ‘loyal’ than serving Jews, homos, Israel, and Diversity. By Diversity and Inclusion(euphemism for Invasion), Jews mean that white Americans must reject their own kind in favor of Jewish supremacism and non-white mass-colonizers. This is great for Jewish supremacism because the increasing number of non-whites allows Jewish elites to play divide-and-rule among the goy races. It’s like Jewish NYT hired Sarah Jeong the Yellow Dog to bark at whitey. And by using that yellow dog as the Face of Anti-Whiteness, Jews mask the fact that THEY are the main ones pushing anti-white vitriol. Jews do the same with Muslims. Jews promote fears of Muslim Terrorism in movies and TV shows. They encourage white Christians to join the military and fight in Wars for Israel that leads to death and destruction of 100,000s of Muslims and Arabs. But then, Jews encourage Muslim Mass-Migration to the West, coddle Muslims as part of Diversity, and indoctrinate them to hate Whitey as the enemy. These Jews are truly a bunch of a**holes.

Now, Alex Jones hasn’t been anti-Jewish or anti-Zionist. At times, he has said Israel is going too far in Gaza or West Bank. But overall, he’s been pro-Zionist and pro-Jewish. If anything, like Rush Limbaugh, he’s been scapegoating ‘Chicoms’ and Yellow Peril. He’s been raising alarms about Muslims and Terrorism. He has rarely said anything that is blatantly critical of Jewish power. Indeed, he once said SAUDI ARABIA controls Hollywood. LOL. Joel Stein would beg to differ. And even after the Jews of Google and Facebook banned Jones, he blames the Chinese, indeed as if Jew-run US corporations take orders from Beijing.
Now, US companies must comply with Chinese demands when they do business IN China. But China has NO SAY whatsoever with what Jew-run companies do IN the US. So, if Alex Jones has been so careful not to tread on the Jewish Tiger’s tail, why has he been BANNED BY JEWS or BBJ? Because he’s popular as not just a journalist but showman and entertainer. He has a large following for his antics as cantankerous maverick(and even some leftists tuned to his show because most of MSM is Deep State propaganda run by a handful of Jewish oligarchs). Also, even though he doesn’t directly go after Jews, his positions on many matters and issues go against their Agenda. This is true of Donald Trump as well. Despite Trump’s constant praise of Jews and Israel, his preference for nationalist sovereignty over globalist hegemony ticks off a lot of Jews who love to use the US to spread permanent Globo-Homo hegemony over the world. Also, Jews want to use the US as a battering-ram against any nation Jews don’t like. So, when Trump wants to de-escalate the war in Syria and bring US troops back home, Jews freak out. When Trump wants better relations with Russia now that the Cold War has passed into the dustbin of history, Jews get all triggered because Jews want to use US power to destroy Russia and make it bow down to Jewish globalist supremacism. Since it’s difficult for Jews to get most Americans riled up about Russia, they made Homomania the central moral-spiritual issue for most proggies. There was a time when most American didn’t worship Homos. If anything, most Americans thought fecal penetration among men was pretty gross. But ever since Jewish media and academia(with funding of Wall Street, Silicon Valley, Las Vegas, and Hollywood) made Homomania the secular religion of the West, so many proggies get triggered over the fact that Russia won’t allow massive globo-homo parades on the Red Square or allow globo-homo propaganda in elementary schools. Proggies are outraged that Russia won’t accept Homomania, rather like how Christian Americans in the past were offended that some heathen population didn't take kindly to Christian missionaries. Remember how US imperialism used to rationalize its incursions and invasions of other nations in the name of spreading the Gospel and the American Way? Today, the neo-missionary zeal is to Globo-Homo-genize the world with Gay Rites. And this was how Jews managed to make so many neo-spiritual Americans hostile to Russia. Evil Russia doesn’t bend over to Homos and Trannies and take it up the ass like the US, UK, Canada, France, and Germany did before their Jewish masters. All those nations exist only to obey and serve the Jewish Agenda. If Jews say they must convert to Homomania as the new faith, they grovel and comply. Indeed, so-called ‘conservatives’ in the UK say ‘gay marriage is a conservative value’. Whatever Jews want, they get. According to Jewish definition of ‘patriotism’, it means non-Jews must be loyal to Jews and whatever Jews like. To a Jew, a Frenchman who is patriotic to France is not a ‘patriot’ but a ‘far rightist’. But if a Frenchman sucks up to Jews, supports Israel, waves the Homo flag, and pledges to inundate France with millions of Africans as New Frenchmen, then such a Frenchman is ‘patriotic’ since he loyally serves the globalist agenda of Jews.

Anyway, even though Alex Jones isn’t directly hostile to Jews and Zionism, he is very critical of the broad globalist agenda favored by Jews to cemented Jewish Supremacist Hegemony over the world. And that is enough for Jews to attack Alex Jones. Indeed, that’s why Jews also attack Russia despite its pro-Jewish stance. Putin has been very accommodating to Jews and has maintained close relations with Israel. But his Russian nationalism stands in opposition to Jewish Globo-Homo Hegemony, and THAT is enough for Jews to see him as the enemy who must be destroyed. So, it’s not enough for goyim to be nice to Jews. Jews will still hate you if you support agendas and policies disfavored by them. So, it doesn’t matter how much you praise Jews or Israel. If you oppose ‘gay marriage’, Jews hate you because Homomania is their baby, their missionary-proxy of world control. It doesn’t matter if you sing hosannas to Israel 24/7. If you oppose Mass Immigration-Invasion, Jews will see you as a ‘Nazi’ because you stand in opposition to the Jewish strategy of increasing Goy Diversity in order to play divide-and-rule among the gentiles.
By now, it should be obvious that Jews are rather like Hitler and Mao. Impossible to appease. No matter how many favors you do for Jews, it’s never enough because Jews want everything. Also, your niceness is seen by Jews as weakness and stupidity. So, they only feel contempt and more greed and press upon you for further concessions.
This is why it is time for whites to make a clean break with Jewish Power. Now, if there are individual Jews who want to join with white patriots, that’s all fine and well. But, give up all hope that white people can come to any meaningful understanding with the Current Jewish Power. Jews think, ‘We win, you lose’. Jews think, 'we are the horseman, you are the horse'. To Jews, whites will always be whores and horses, or whorses. Also, when Jews are so blatant in hiring anti-white activists like Sarah Jeong for the NYT, it is time to name the Jew. It’s not enough to say the NYT did it. NYT is run by whom? Just say it. As long as Jews are explicitly demeaning whites and bitching all the time that there are ‘too many whites’ in positions of power and privilege, it is time for whites to shout back and say it’s the JEWS who are most disproportionately represented in positions of power and privilege and also that Jews invoke ‘white privilege’ as misdirection to distract the gullible fools from noticing the Real Power concentrated in the hands of globo-homo Jewish Supremacists. We must name the Jew. Indeed, it is downright pathetic that even when Jews are the #1 bashers of Trump and white people, Trump and white people drone on and on about how they love Jews and Israel. Enough already. It’s sickening to see that even after Jews took Alex Jones off the platforms, Jones is being mealymouthed and yapping about ‘China’. It’d be like Stalin bitching about UK after Germany invaded USSR in 1941. You cannot win any war UNLESS you name the enemy and fix upon it as your main target. If someone is shooting at you, you must identify where the bullets are coming from and shoot back at the source. If you willfully refuse to pinpoint the target and shoot at everything but the person shooting at you, you will not only leave your enemy unharmed but get shot and die. We need to wake up and say it like it is. Jews did this. Jews have the real power. Jews are behind the censorship. Jews have monopolistic and oligarchic control over media and platforms. The current situation is obscene in a nation where Jews are only 2% of the population. It is time white people said NO MORE SUPPORT FOR ISRAEL. It’s time they said, WE WILL TREAT JEWS LIKE THEY TREAT US WHITES. WE WILL SEE JEWS LIKE THEY SEE US WHITES. Fight fire with fire. Why does Margaret Dumont always lose in Marx Brothers movies? Because even as the Jewish pranksters mock her and abuse her, she treats them as her dear friends. With the Jewish move on Alex Jones, it’s really over. If whites, patriots, and conservatives don’t name the Jew now, they have no one to blame but themselves.

Now, some will say it’s not only Jews. Apple is run by Tim Cook, an Anglo-Homo. But being homo, he’s part of the Globo-Homo World Order pushed by Jews. Also, in any society, most people fall in line with the Dominant Narrative. In the Soviet Union, everyone had to praise Marx and Lenin to get ahead. There was NO WAY one could ascend the ladder without pledging to the gods of communism. It’s like the Jews who converted to Christianity in the 19th century to get a leg up in society. Back then, Europe was profoundly Christian, and it was unthinkable in many European nations that a non-Christian should enter respectable society or work in government. So, even Jews who really despised Christianity converted to it and gained the credentials to make more money, be admitted to high society, and gain employment in the state.
It’s no different today. With Jew-worship, Homo-worship, and Afro-worship as the Neo-Religion of the West, one must prove one’s credentials as a slavish and servile toady of Jews and their favored icons to make it in society. If not, you aren't allowed in. Also, if you have already gained power and wealth but get exposed as a ‘racist’, ‘anti-Semite’, or ‘homophobe’, the full force of the Jew-run media will come after you to turn you into a non-person. ('Racism' never means what Zionist killers are doing to Palestinians and Arab nations. It doesn't mean Victoria Nuland the Neocon recruiting real neo-Nazis in Ukraine. It's always about Jews accusing OTHERS with their monopoly of media.) And then, all institutions and industries will be pressured to treat you as a non-person as well. We are told we live in a secular liberal democracy, but ours is a neo-religious order with new sacraments and taboos. This is why, even after Jews and their cuck-collaborators deplatformed him, Alex Jones says NOTHING critical about Jews and only mumbles about ‘Chicoms’ and Yellow Peril. But people like Jones must ask at this juncture... "What is there to lose?" When he’s been attacked and removed from so much of the internet, he might as go for the Samson Option and call out on the Jews. If they take you down, go down screaming. Go down spilling the beans on WHO was really behind your downfall. Don’t go your death cowering in fear and pleading for mercy like the victims of Stalin. Go with a loud voice yelling WHO is really behind all the shit. Go out like Tony Montana.


Now, the Jew-run media and Jew-run platforms are saying Alex Jones was removed for ‘hate speech’ and ‘fake news’. But what this really means is that the Power gets to defame anything as ‘hate’ or ‘fake’ in order to justify shutting it down. Of course, these standards don’t apply to the Jew-run media. Never mind all the lies told by Deep State and Media about WMD's that led to the US invasion of Iraq. Never mind all the lies told about Russia and Ukraine. Even now, Jew-run MSM says Russia invaded Georgia when, in fact, Russia retaliated against Georgia's invasion of South Ossetia with the encouragement of Neocon Jews. (And there's no outcry in MSM about IDF death squads killing Palestinians. Nothing about Zionist occupation of Golan Heights that belong to Syria. Nothing about 2018 being the 70th anniversary of Nakba Pogroms that destroyed Palestine.) Never mind that Obama used Neocon Victoria Nuland to recruit Neo-Nazis to pull off a coup to bring down a democratically government in Ukraine. Never mind the US told lies to intervene in Libya that was reduced to a failed state. (And we thought Pearl Harbor was bad stuff.  Did Japan do to the US what the US did to Iraq and Libya? By the way, the US still illegally occupies parts of Syria, and Jews are most triggered when Trump wants to pull out the troops. Jews want Trump as globo-imperialist than American nationalist because it is globo-imperialism that does the bidding of Jewish Supremacism.) Never mind all the lies about Syria to cover up American, Saudi, and Israeli support for terrorists who tore that nation apart. Never mind the lies that Diversity is working out just swell for the EU.

Never mind the media lies about Trayvon Martin and George Zimmerman, especially the editing of the phone call to make it seem like Zimmerman was looking for a black guy to hunt down and kill. Never mind the lies of BLM favored by the media. Michael Brown was no ‘gentle giant’, and he never said "Hands up, Don’t shoot". And it is a lie that the main threat to blacks in the US is white cops gunning down innocent blacks. Blacks kill blacks, along with people of other races. Never mind the lies about black crime, calling black thugs ‘youths’ and ‘teens’. Never mind the lies told by Chicago government and media about why the Oakstreet beach was closed. It was because blacks attacked whites, but the Narrative was ‘heat wave’ on a day when the temperature was only 80 degrees. Never mind the lies of Sabrina Rubin Erderly who made Stephen Glass seem like a honest reporter. Erderly’s lies about UVA led to an attack on the innocent fraternity and prompted a media-wide defamation of white fraternities. (By the way, try searching for UVA Rape Hoax and Mark Dice on Youtube. Jews at Youtube and Jews in MSM rigged the algorithms so that the Mark Dice video never shows up, and all you get are Jewish-dominated 'mainstream' News Sources in the search results. Never mind that it was independent internet journalists who cracked that case while MSM showered praise on Sabrina Rubin Erderly as a potential Pulitzer candidate. We are all Palestinians. The West is one big Information West Bank. Occupied territory.) Never mind the lies about Charlottesville. The Unite the Right guys came to make a speech, but the mayor and the police illegally shut down the event and instigated violence by pushing Unite the Right attendees into mobs of Antifa. But the media spin was a complete lie. A total Jewish lie. And then, there is the biggest conspiracy theory in US history, the bullshit about Trump colluding with Russia. It was pushed to prevent any rapprochement between the US and Russia because Jews and Globo-Homo lunatics seek total hegemony and hate Russia as an obstacle. Trump’s idea that the US, as a sovereign nation, should have good relations with Russia as a sovereign nation is an affront to Jews and the Deep State that wants the US to be in globo-imperialist footing to force all nations to submit to Jewish globo-homo hegemony. And of course, the Dotcom bubble and Real Estate bubble were the result of Jewish deregulation of banks and cooked books that fed on false optimism. And when the economy blew up, the very Jews who were most responsible for the mess got their boy Obama to bail out the banks, whereupon Wall Street grew even richer while the rest of the economy scraped by. Compared to all such abuses, it seems Alex Jones’ silly antics did hardly any harm. I know he said something about ‘gay frogs’ and raised alarms about junk food and such stuff. But nothing he said did the kind of damage done to the world by Jews and the Deep State. In fact, it was Alex Jones’ sometimes effective tirades against globalism, neo-imperialism, and the military-industrial complex that made him dangerous to the Establishment of both parties. After all, most GOP guys are cuck-collaborators and whores of monsters like Sheldon Adelson. Even though Jones didn’t have the courage to go all out and call it like it is, the fact is he said JUST ENOUGH to make millions of Americans wake up to the fact that the US is run by a globalist oligarchy with monopoly control of media, academia, finance, and internet. It wasn’t 100% true but at least 50% true. And 50% truth is threatening to those who push 100% fake news all the time.

https://www.rt.com/usa/435271-alex-jones-inforwars-censorship/

When certain communities wanted to ban obscene or seditious material in the name of ‘community values’, Liberals and ACLU attacked the censorship as unconstitutional. Free speech must trump ‘community values’. Pornography must enter every community, they said.

But now, Jews and proggies invoke ‘community standards’ to shut down certain speech. But whose community are they talking about? If Alex Jones had more than 2 million followers on Youtube, that was quite a community, and the members of that community thought Jones was speaking for them. So, ‘community standards’, as used by Jewish tech-oligarchs, is a weasel term. Youtube and Facebook are banning Jones for the interests of Jewish Tribal Interests, not this thing called 'community standards'. After all, if these Jews really believe in all-around niceness, why do they allow all manner of Zionists who justify the ongoing occupation and land-theft in West Bank? Why is Google economically engaged with Israel that uses IDF death squads to gun down Palestinian women and children? Is Zionist Judeo-Nazism okay by the 'community standards' of Facebook and Youtube?

How is that Jews, who make up 2% of US population, get to decide what the COMMUNITY STANDARDS are for all of us? Google banned Jones for the same reason it bans any doodle for Easter. It’s not kosher enough. This is koshering of media and internet.

Now, some will say that Facebook and Youtube are private companies. But the fact is they function as public virtual communities, not least with support of the government. They are used by members to form communities centered around shared values, beliefs, and politics. These have become just as important as real communities. So, when the ‘community standards’ favor certain groups over others, it’s like a town invoking ‘community values’ to ban certain ideas or expressions.

At any rate, whites are beginning to realize what it’s like to be a Palestinian. Palestinians are arbitrarily censored or arrested. They cannot stop Jewish illegals pouring into West Bank. Sound familiar? White support of Zionism was the biggest mistake. Jews don’t show gratitude. Instead, they see what they did to Palestinians and use it as the template for what to do with other goyim.

The only way to fight back is by naming Jewish Power and siding with Palestinians. Jews do stuff like this because they know whites will praise Jews and defend Jews no matter what Jews do to whites. If you hit someone and if your victim still praises you, you will keep hitting him. It is only when he hits back that you will think twice about hitting him again.

Enough is enough. It is time to say WAAP or We Are All Palestinians.

A Response to "Heritage Foundation Defends Facebook’s ‘Right’ to Censor, Will Oppose Regulation" on Breitbart

http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2018/05/03/heritage-foundation-defends-facebooks-right-to-censor-will-oppose-regulation/

Heritage Foundation is so full of BS.

Now, the argument that Facebook can do as it pleases because it is a private company has merit... if it were consistently applied.

BUT, would Heritage Foundation argue in such manner IF Facebook were owned by Palestinian-Americans and banned Pro-Zionist pages and voices as 'hateful' to Arabs? Really?

Or suppose Twitter is owned by Iranian-Americans who detest Israel and Zionists. Suppose they ban AIPAC, ADL, and other pro-Zionist groups as 'hate groups'. Would  Heritage Foundation support the right of Twitter to ban pro-Zionist voices?

Or suppose Youtube is owned by Chinese-Americans and they worked with pro-Chinese voices(even in China itself) to shut down critics of China as 'hateful'. And suppose pro-Tibetan voices are banned from Youtube also. Would Heritage foundation support that?

No, of course not.

Also, the so-called Liberals are total hypocrites. They've been saying forever that it was EVIL and ANTI-AMERICAN for the Red Scare and Anti-communists to have fired and blacklisted people suspected of being communists or communist-sympathizers because, after all, the Constitution protects people's civil liberties regardless of race, color, or creed.

CREED means ideology, belief, religion, or conviction.

But now, the Liberals are saying people should not be hired or they should be fired on the basis of creed alone. If their creed is 'hateful'(according to Judeo-Nazis and Homomaniacs who rule current America), they must be shut down. Examples of obvious truths censored by Twitter that takes from Judeo-Nazi organization ADL that supports Zionist tyranny over Palestinians:

And,Heritage Foundation, a cucky-wuck organization, says Facebook and other companies(owned by people of certain ethnic group) can ban people who advocate for white interests.

With a 'right' like that, who needs the left?

Worst of all is the sheer hypocrisy. The goal posts keep changing to favor one side. So, we are told that blacklisting communists and leftist radicals during the 'McCarthy Era' was so terrible because of 'Muh Constitution'. We've heard that narrative a million times from textbooks and PBS documentaries.

But when it comes to pro-white voices calling for white national liberation from PC tyranny and Jewish Supremacism, they must be fired, blacklisted, and shut down. And the Liberal Media are fully behind the silencing. But then, most of the media, like most internet platforms, are owned and controlled by Jews who are only 2% of the US population. (And Heritage Foundation relies on rich Jews and cuck-oligarchs for donations.)

But then, the very people who've denounced America of the 40s and 50s for anti-communist and anti-Soviet hysteria are now pushing the totally nonsensical paranoid hysteria about 'Russia Hacking'. These psychos are shameless. At the very least, the Soviet Union after WWII was a real empire with a radical ideology. In contrast, Russia today just wants peace and trade. So, why is anti-Russia hysteria worse than ever? Because Jews rule America and hate Russia because Russia won't play nice doggy to EOJ or Empire of Judea. It won't bend over to Homomania(a form of Satanic-Jewish-christianity) and won't let Jewish oligarchs totally own the place.

In truth, Jew-run Hollywood was always about blacklisting. Suppose any writer or director proposes an idea for a movie about the Nakba Pogroms of 1948 from the Palestinian POV. Or a movie about Charlottesville that shows what REALLY happened, i.e. Jewish mayor, black police chief, Deep State, and Big Media all conspired to shut down the event and railroad White National Liberationists who said NO to Jewish Supremacism.

I guarantee that person will never work in Hollywood again. The anti-communist era blacklisted lasted just several years. But anti-white and anti-Palestinian blacklisting in Hollywood go on forever.