I guess not. All those brainy people on the Left, all those millionaires in Silicon Valley — not even they can figure out how to explain why we’re wrong. Why can’t they? Because we’re right. And so, we have to be smothered.
Proper terminology is of the essence. Indeed, many dissidents on our side have long argued that the Enemy willfully, stupidly, or just dishonestly uses false labels to smear the opposition. So, whites opting out of the globalist program are smeared as 'white supremacists'. Nowadays, if you mock Seth Rogan and Sarah Silverman's X-mas offal, you're a 'white supremacist'. Parents who criticize CRT are 'white supremacists'. Those who demand more investigation into the 2020 election are 'white supremacists'. Whites who are okay being white are 'white supremacists'. Dissidents on our side are rightfully angry that they are smeared with false terminology and slanderous labels. It's like brand-hoaxing, but then, we live in a world where trannies are labeled as 'women' as if gender-confused maladies are a badge of pride.
If the great lie of the Jewish globalist cabal is to smear anything pro-white as 'white supremacist', the great lie of White Advocates & Dissident Rightists(and conservatives in general) is to use the 'left' label on their persecutors. The Jewish-led Cabal is no more 'leftist' than pro-white groups are 'white supremacist'. (There is a small faction of genuine white supremacists but half of them happen to be recalcitrant neo-nazi and the other half are Feds.) Both sides dare not name it as it really is. Jewish Power(that is behind all this 'woke' garbage) and the Right spectrum are both incapable of seeing it like it is or saying it like it is.
It's far worse for the Right because, whereas the Jewish Lie is to pinpoint and vastly exaggerate the White Politics of the Right, the White Lie(that employs the 'leftist' label as all-inclusive epithet) is to give cover to the identity of their main enemy. Imagine Bob and Billy are at loggerheads. Bob goes out of his way to name BILLY as the baddie and says "BAD BILLY is an a**hole", "BAD BILLY is a shi*head", "BAD BILLY is a psycho", and etc. Bob calls Billy "Bad Billy" and associates Billy with all that is bad.
But, what does Billy do? Instead of calling out on Bob, let alone Bad Bob, he blames all of Bob's nastiness on "Mr. Negativity". So, Bob is never mentioned by name. All his nasty antics isn't associated with his personage. Rather, they're blamed on some vague generality called "Mr. Negativity". Anyone listening to this debate would think, "Maybe Billy really is Bad Billy and responsible for all those awful things. And, if Billy is right, Negativity must be to blame for the other problems." In this war of words, Billy is named but Bob isn't. No matter how often Bob associates Billy with Bad Stuff, Billy never names Bob and blames Bob's bad stuff on some vague 'negativity'. Guess who's going to win?
Even though both the 'white supremacist' and 'leftist' labels are misleading or downright falsehoods, the key difference is, whereas pro-white people feel the sting of being called 'white supremacist', Jews and globalist elite cucks love being called the 'left'. It is precisely what they want. Imagine having all the power, privilege, connections, and advantages but being associated with radical egalitarianism. ROTFL. Imagine being George Soros and being called a 'leftist'. Imagine being Michael Bloomberg or the Google Billionaires or some Zionist Jewish tycoon and being called a 'leftist' because one supports the smoke-and-mirrors false 'leftism' of gender-pronoun nuttery that is really the product of capitalist decadence and globo-homo neo-aristocratism.
While Jewish Power isn't only naming but DEFAMING whiteness by associating anything pro-white or race-neutral as 'white supremacist', those on the Right Spectrum dare not name the real power behind the anti-white lunacy(either due to craven fear of Jewish Power or the internalization of the notion that ANY anti-Jewish criticism is tantamount to naziesque 'antisemitism'). According to Jewish-controlled 'wokeness', even 'progressive' whites are 'white supremacist'. Now, this much reviled 'whiteness' really applies to Northern European(and pale-faced)whiteness, not to Latin whiteness. You'd think given the Latin/Hispanic lead in the conquest of the New World, the slave trade, and various 'genocides', Latin-American whites would especially get it in the neck from 'wokeness', but they're relatively spared because they are useful allies against 'gringos', the real prize white horse on which Jewish Power sits astride. After all, if Jews had moved only to Latin America, would they be masters of the world? No, Jewish supremacism needed to harness the ability and competence of Anglo-Germanic whiteness.
'Wokery' says all (pale)whites are 'white supremacist', but the dividing line is between those who profess their sins vs those who refuse to repent. In other words, it shares the same moral-spiritual dynamics of Christianity that says ALL humans are sinners and must rely on Jesus for salvation. Thus, Christianity isn't about the sinless vs the sinful but about the repentant sinful vs the unrepentant sinful. The repentant sinful feel more virtuous because they confess their sins and admit to the wickedness within their hearts, and this fills them with righteous fury toward those who reject the notion of sin and refuse to self-flagellate themselves. 'Wokristianity' says all whites are stained with the sin of 'white supremacism' because of history(though some even claim it's ingrained in lame whitebread genetics, thereby the only way out is through ACOWW or Afro-Colonization of White Wombs that makes white women give birth to sacred black babies, a kind of baptism of the white body with black semen, which seems to be the point of madonna's "Like a Prayer" video). 'Wokery' insists that even the most proggy do-goody whites are 'white supremacist' either subconsciously or by habit, legacy, or social privileges. Thus, it's not a matter of 'white supremacism' vs 'white egalitarianism' but between repentant 'white supremacists' who tirelessly purge their wicked hearts of this white 'sin' and 'white supremacists' who either revel in their supremacy or deny that they are supremacist even though they're beneficiaries of 'systemic racism'. This is why 'woke' whites are especially nutty. It's not just a case of tribalism of us-vs-them but the righteous pride of spiritual atonement. What made Christian piety so insufferable is also what makes 'wokeness' so hard to stomach. It's about people claiming, "I'm so much better than you because I atone and admit how totally shitty I am." Self-abasement as stepping stone to self-aggrandizement.
Of course, this nuttery is appealing to white progs because it's just pseudo-sophisticated enough to catch their fancy — ooh, 'subconsciously racist', that's some psychologically intellectual stuff — and comes with a kernel of truth, i.e. society doesn't suddenly change into what it professes to be but lingers(even for a long spell) with traces of the past, e.g. Modern India ideologically did away with the caste system, but the legacy lingers; China did away with Confucianism, but its cultural shadow still looms large; Japan hasn't been a samurai society for over a century and half, but certain samuraish ways still remain.
But, the same could be said of Jews and blacks. Modern Jews claim to be mostly liberal and cosmopolitan, but their behavior continued to be guided by ancient tribalism. Blacks claim to be part of the modern world but are still driven by jungle-jive genetics.
The comprehensive use of 'white supremacist' to describe American History(and the West in general) is misleading. US was white-dominant than white-supremacist. It was founded by whites, and naturally whites created a new order in their image and on their heritage. (In a way, it was more Anglo-dominant as non-Anglo white immigrants were pressured to assimilate to Anglo-American norms. It's certainly the reason we all speak English.) But, if America had been founded and settled from the Pacific by the Japanese, it would have been Japanese/Asian dominant. Every civilization has a dominant force, power, presence, rule. Arab World was Arab-dominant, and Muslim World was Muslim-dominant. Slavic World was Slavic Dominant, just like Turkey was Turkic-dominant. A kind of dominance remains in force even under foreign occupation; such sub-dominance later becomes the basis for national liberation. Even under Roman rule, Jewish communities within Judea were Jewish-dominant. Even under British rule, India was demographically and culturally Hindu-dominant. Even under Russian-Germanic imperial rule, Polish society was Polish-dominant, and this Polish sub-dominance later re-emerged as rallying cry for national autonomy.
It's like, even under Jewish Rule over America, many white Christian communities remain white/Christian dominant. This fact appears to enrage Jews who want to substitute whiteness with total cuckery and Christianity with globo-homo-BLM 'wokeness'. The difference between 'supremacist' and 'dominant' is the former tends to have no sense of limits and seeks hegemony over others. When Adolf Hitler was focused on German revival, he was for German Dominance. When he invaded Poland and later Russia, it was a case of German Supremacism. Most white Americans today have no use for world conquest or control — the US, a huge country with the best land in the world, is enough for them. European patriots want to keep their own nations, worlds of their own. They don't want to conquer Africa, Asia, or the Middle East. Notwithstanding neo-imperialist morons like Richard Spencer(who thinks he's 007 in Darth Vader helmet), most white American patriots had enough of overseas wars and want the military to guard US borders.
If any group is in supremacist mode in the US, it's the Jews, homos, military-industrial complex, and the cuck-dogs of Zion(like John Bolton and so many others). It's amusing indeed that the most supremacist and aggressive forces in America accuse white patriots of 'white supremacism'. In other words, those who prefer peace and national security are 'white supremacist' while those who call for hegemony and more tensions with the rest of the world are for 'liberal democracy' and 'equity'. What a joke to be 'woke'.
Essentially, 'wokeness' is a Jewish psycho-moral weapon to guilt-bait whites into paralysis and submission, which is then used to manipulate whites into serving Jewish Power. The mental programming goes like this, "I'm a white person stained with the sin of 'racism' and 'supremacism'. Thus, I deserve no agency and autonomy and must look to the sacred races for guidance. I must wash black feet and obey Jews, the Holy Holocaust people, and maybe just then, I'll earn an ounce of redemption points."
Even though conzos reject 'wokeness', they have their own variation which operates much the same way. After all, what is the GOP platform based on but "We are the good guys because we cuck to Israel more"? But, why would the Party of White Christian Conservatives need to cuck to Jews and Israel? It can only be explained in terms of "We white Christians are morally deficient, therefore we need the approval of Holy Holocaust Jews to attain real moral worth." So, any Zio-Cuck conzo should look in the mirror before he or she lambastes the inner dynamics of 'wokeness'.
The knee-jerk tendency of designating the Enemy as the 'left' has made it harder to drive a wedge between the globalist/cabalist elites and the masses of whites into the politics of justice. Granted, there are some genuine leftist types who call foul on globalism, corporatism, deep-statism, and the like. But as long as they're lumped in with the billionaire oligarchs, Zionist-globalists, and the power elites, there will be far less inclination on their part to see the light and resist the real power.
Indeed, even though Jewish Supremacists sometimes blame the 'right', they are far less likely to go on and on about 'the right, the right, the right' because they're focused on driving a wedge between elements within the Right Spectrum. By focusing on 'white supremacism', they seek to cause a rift between 'decent conservatives' and 'those racists'. So, even as the Democratic Party is broadly 'anti-right', it offers an olive branch to 'decent' elements of conservatism, and this is what National Review runs on: "We are the good decent principled conservatives who cuck half the time, unlike those 'racists'."
In contrast, by constantly attacking the LEFT, the Right Spectrum only ends up strengthening the bonds between Jewish oligarchs/Big Capital and the white masses into Resistance Politics.
What we really need to do is drive a wedge between the elites and the leftist masses and then build a bridge between white populists and white socialists. Socialism isn't to be confused with communism, which is dead and has no chance. Socialism is necessary because the current system is a rigged game. The government is no longer interested in going after monopolies. 'Free trade' undermined unions. The Covid regimen showed how the Power can push a few buttons and destroy countless middle class businesses while fattening the wallets of the already-super-rich. Any notion of free and fair competition under such a system is a pipe dream. Now, the socialism I have in mind isn't anything like communism and accepts the role of capitalism. But it also understands that capitalism leads to monopolies, concentrations of power, and corporate collusion between big capital and big state(something totally overlooked by libertarians who seem to idealize capitalists as principled individualists when many of them are unscrupulous tribalists or gangstoids). The socialism I have in mind uses political tools to combat the worst abuses of capitalism and its cancerous coordination with elite power centers.
Also, this socialism isn't to be confused with statism(with is really status-ism via collusion of state and capital). True socialism is about use of power to favor the people, the powerless, and the under-represented. In contrast, statism is about careerism via government jobs or state funded programs. While socialism always needs to use the power of the state, statism is far less concerned with the interests of the people than for the individuals who procure roles for themselves in government or by NGO funding. Though statists often claim to be working for 'social justice' or the People, they are only in it for themselves. They are looking for sinecures and the like. The proof is in the pudding. Notice how so many urban educated 'woke' types and blacks claim to be 'socialist' but all they care about is obtaining some statist job or gaining funding so they can sustain status and lifestyle on par with the professional class. When have these 'woke' statist types ever spoken up for the workers, the underclass, and the like? No, it's mostly about globo-homo or tranny nuttery. Or pie-in-the-sky schemes related to global warming, which means all they have to do is produce more paperwork and 'studies' without doing anything concrete or real. Or, it's about More Immigrants so that Big Business can have cheaper hirelings. Or, it's about the mindless adulation of blackness as a kind of racial fetish when anyone really interested in black well-being would call for less immigration(thus raising wages for blacks) and more police protection(that not only shields whites from blacks but suppresses black-on-black violence).
The future must be neo-fascist or social-nationalist. It has to be about the union of rightism and leftism as both have much value to offer. So, stop dumping on the 'left' and focus on the supremacist manipulators of globalism, capitalism, and statism. At the top, it's Jewish Power. Speak up for Palestinians because what Zionists did to Palestinians was dress rehearsal for what is being done to the West. Do everything to make the people, 'right' or 'left', more aware of who really rules the West. Point out that the core tenets of Globalism are really fueled by ultra-right Zionist Supremacism, not by Leftism. For proof, look how Jewish Power has totally suppressed BDS and pro-Palestinian voices within the supposedly 'leftist' Democratic Party. Point out to the progs of their misguidedness in opposing 'white supremacism'(when whites only want liberation from Jewish supremacism) while, in effect, doing the bidding of Jewish Supremacists who are the main drivers of wars and imperialism around the world. Indeed, what better way to save the world than via White Liberation from Jewish Supremacism. Once whites say NO to Jewish Power, Zio-Globalism will no longer have a white war horse to ride on to trample around the globe.
Among many on the Right Spectrum, there's the image of the Democratic Party being driven to the Far Left. Nothing can be further from the truth. The problem is the Democratic Party is totally beholden to the Imperial Center. Biden's regime is filled with Jewish Supremacists and totally in cahoots with Big Capital. It sees eye-to-eye with Zion. It is favored by the Military Industrial Complex that revs the engine for wars with Russia, China, and/or Iran. Sure, there's massive border crisis and tranny-gender nuttery, but both are favored by Jewish Supremacist-capitalists. The True Left didn't come up with globo-homo, even though plenty of leftists foolishly signed on in deference to Jewish Power(but then so did plenty of conzos). If the Democratic Party were truly controlled by the Far Left, things would actually be far better. The War Industry would be called out. Wall Street would be denounced. Big Pharma would be condemned. Homos would be criticized for working in the deep state to spread wars and terror. Blacks would be called on to favor universal justice over racial idolatry. There would be calls to treat Jews and Palestinians equally. But where do you see that in the Democratic Party? In truth, the agenda is purely Imperial Centrist, aka Jewish-capitalist-supremacist.
