What TREASON Means in a Globo-Homo World dominated by Jewish Supremacism — Were the Confederates 'Treasonous'? — Are Current Deep State Elites Treasonous to the American Nation? — Immigration as Treason

One man's treason is another man's reason and vice versa.

Was Southern Secession an act of treason? Yes, if you regard the American Union as inviolable and indivisible. No, if you believe in states' rights, including the right to secede. It all depends on the very premise, the foundational basis, of one's worldview or national view. One could say US was created out of treason against the Mother Country. Or one can say it was founded on liberty and independence from Father Tyranny, like with Zeus' rebellion against his own father Cronus.

Also, if US is so against treason, why encourage it around the world? US has collaborator agents in every country and encourages(and even bribes) them to serve US interests than their own national interests. US remains in Afghanistan by propping up a puppet regime that many Afghans regard as treasonous.

Also, looking back on US history, was Manifest Destiny a treasonous act? If US values and ideals are about equal respect for all peoples and cultures, then Manifest Destiny violated such principles by expanding westward and committing 'genocide' on the native folks. Was US conquest of the SW Territories treasonous? After all, if US was founded on terms of national independence and sovereignty, did it not violate the sovereignty of Mexico by provoking and waging war and taking so much territory?
Of course, one can make counter-arguments and say that the vision of America has been to spread liberty and expand progress. So, if US took more land and grew bigger in order to spread more freedom and development, it was all worth it and very pro-American.

So, on the matter of the Confederacy, one can make a case for treason or against treason. Depending on the premise, either argument is valid, or invalid. It's like a conscientious objector can be regarded as a traitor/coward or a hero/saint depending on one's views. And then, there are matters of dual or higher loyalty. Muhammad Ali considered himself an American but also a BLACK American and a black Muslim. As such, he had a loyalty higher than that to what he perceived as White America. He didn't serve in Vietnam because he saw it as a white man's war. In a way, one could say he was treasonous, but in another way, he was being true to his higher loyalties, i.e. had he served in the war, he would have been treasonous to Allah(as conceived by Nation of Islam).

Personally, treason is most despicable when it's mostly about personal gain, opportunism, and vanity. If you turn against your own people for thirty pieces of silver, you are scum. Or if you switch loyalties to the other side simply because it seems 'cooler' and more prestigious to with the richer/greater power, then you're hollow and lack a core. On the other hand, what may seem treasonous and are indeed so from the traditional perspective may be necessary reforms. Any great social upheaval or revolution is an act of treason against the past, resulting in much crisis and agony. But it allows the birth of an improved or new order that may well benefit the great majority. Rise of Modern Turkey was an act of treason against the traditional Ottoman order, but it was time for much needed changes. But such treason, as with the American Revolution against the British Monarchy, was fueled by much idealism and vision, therefore isn't despicable like treason for mere opportunism. (Besides, one could argue arch-conservatism is also an act of treason. If the role of the ruling class is to govern well and improve the lives of its subjects, then its absolute refusal to adopt superior means and greater justice could be construed as an act of treason against their obligation to rule well and fairly.)

There are obvious examples of treason, but many are subtle, ambiguous, and/or even subconscious. Take mass immigration to the West. Most non-whites don't consider it as treasonous. And even the ruling elites of many non-white nations encourage their own kind to emigrate. Maybe, it's due to surplus population, gaining greater economic access to and influence over the metropole, hope for remittances from the immigrant community, and etc. This kind of immigration isn't regarded as treasonous because emigrants from nation A aren't specifically going to the US or EU to do harm to their country of origin. For example, Turks aren't going to Germany or US to join some institution to do harm to Turkey. And yet, immigration is a kind of treason in the sense that immigrants are abandoning their own nations, pledging allegiance to another nation, forgetting their own identities & cultures, and mixing with other races to dangerous levels of deracination.
Furthermore, given the imperial nature of the US-EU empire under Jewish Power, there is always the chance(and not a slight one) that the empire will target, sanction, destroy, and even invade your nation of origin. Indeed, what are Iranians to do when the US is causing great harm to Iran? Some Iranian-Americans in the US military will have to drop bombs on their own people if it comes to war. Even Iranian-American civilians must pay taxes that go to support Jewish supremacist war on Iran. What are Russian-Americans to do when the US, under Jewish control, is relentless in its hate campaigns against Russia? What are Chinese in America to do if a war breaks out between US and China?
Look to the past, and what did German-Americans end up doing in World War I? They were recruited to kill fellow Germans. (In the case of World War II, it made good sense for German-Americans to fight for the US because Germany declared war, but US entry into WWI was on bogus grounds to serve global bankers. But German-Americans had to fight and kill their own ethno-brethren. [Jews understand this aspect of American History, i.e. it tends to push treasonous views on immigrants to wage war on their own kind in the Old World, e.g. German-Americans vs Germans and Japanese-Americans vs Japanese. And that is why Jews are adamant about remaining JEWISH-Americans than Jewish-AMERICANS, and that is also why Jews use media power and political influence to drum all politicians and all Americans with the notion that "Israel is America's greatest ally", i.e. Zion is synonymous with America.] Also, German-Americans were such craven cowards that, instead of pushing back against vile anti-German campaign in the US during WWI, they did all they could to Anglo-Americanize themselves. In some ways, Jews were more admirable in their resistance to such pressures following World War II when many Jews were under suspicion of sympathizing with World Communism. Jews were wrong to support communism but right to guard Jewish identity from American Power. The fate of German-Americans and Swedish-Americans should be a powerful lesson about what happens to a people when they lose a strong sense of who they are and where they came from. Of course, the deracination disease has struck not only German-Americans and Swedish-Americans but Germans in Germany and Swedes in Sweden. The fate is Milwaukee, Madison, and Minneapolis. Once wonderful places, now either crime-fested cities or 'woke' tardopolises into globo-homo-mania.)

Thus, the story of mass immigration to the US has been a kind of treason. Immigration can only lead to ambivalent feelings about identity. After all, Mexicans have contradictory views of Mexican-Americans. In some ways, they are fellow Mexicanos, fellow Tacoan brethren. Many Mexicans even see Mexican-American immigration, legal and illegal, as a kind of Reconquista. But in another way, Mexicans feel that Mexican-Americans who speak only Ingles, serve in the US military, and work as Cuckez agents of Gringo Nation are traitors. One reason why so many Mexicans didn't warm up to Jeb Bush despite his being so pro-Mexican and having a Mexican wife was that the couple looked so much like a symbol of US domination over Mexico. Big Gringo Man and Tiny Brown Woman. What Jeb regarded as his warmth and affection for Mexico was seen by Mexicans as domination and condescension. So, while many white Americans considered Jeb Bush as a symbol of treason — globalist selling White America to brown future — , many Mexicans saw Jeb's wife as the kind of typical Mexican female in Hollywood movies with a gringo man or hubber.

So, the charge of 'treason' is never a sure thing as anything can be deemed treasonous simply by moving the goal posts or altering the coding of core principles. The current war on Confederacy is essentially part of the Jewish War on White. Just like Jews say whiteness is not intrinsic to being French or British or Dutch or Swedish or whatever, they say any form of defiant white identity is evil and wrong. Jews used BLM to not only topple Confederate but British statues. Neocons are especially invested in destroying the Confederate legacy because they operate in the GOP. As GOP relies so heavily on the Deep South, it has become de facto the Neo-Confederate Party, or the Neocon-Federate Party. But that means Neocons in the GOP are associated with Southern 'racists', and that means people can connect Neocons & Zionism with White Southern Redneck 'racism'.
This is all very ironic because Jews, both Neocons and Liberal Zionists, totally support Israeli tyranny over Palestinians, turn a blind eye to IDF death squads mowing down Palestinian women & children, and support apartheid as practice in West Bank. Also, these 'progressive' Jews work well with theocratic Saudis and ISIS types. (They even work well with quasi-Neo-Nazis in Ukraine, though to be sure, 'neo-nazism' in Ukraine has a somewhat more positive pedigree for its resistance against Stalinism during World War II.)

The rule of American Politics is, "If Jews want it, they get it." Not only do Jews push for it but, once the word is out that Jews want it, goy politicos of either party dare not push back against Jews. So, both parties are totally for suppressing BDS. Both are for more billions to Israel and more sanctions on Iran and Syria. Both are now for globo-homo-mania. Both are for Negrolatry, what with Trump rhapsodizing about Fentanyl 'groid' Floyd smiling down upon us from heaven. (More likely, angels have their knees on his neck before casting his ghastly negro self down to hell.) If Jews want it, they get it. Jews got the power, and the Power decides. Sure, because the US is a democracy, Jews don't get everything right away, but they eventually get it as they get to push while no one pushes back. If one side pushes while other side doesn't push back, the pusher eventually wins even if it takes time. It's simple law of physics. If a car is on neutral and if someone pushes from the rear while no one pushes from the front, the car will eventually move in one direction. Jews made sure there will be no counter-push to their pushiness.
As for the GOP, the attack on Confederacy is both troubling and relieving. It may lead to anger in the White South, but as the GOP is the Party of Lincoln, it's always been inconvenient for it to rely on so many Neo-Confederate votes. But then, the Culture War against the White South has been so relentless and overwhelming that even many white southerners are now finally dropping their 'shameful' heritage that insults the new cult of Negrolatry. Lynyrd Skynyrd consented to stop using Confed flags at their concerts. NASCAR now follows suit. Walmart began in the South, but Confed flags have been OUT since the church shooting some yrs ago. Dixie Chicks are now just Chicks. While Antifa and BLM thugs ravage memorials and statues, most white Southerners remain on the plantation of cuckery and do nothing.

Also, white Southern elites were trained in places like Harvard and Yale and other 'liberal' colleges. As such, they are little more than mental cucks of Jews and globalists. Besides, the current Southern elite attitudes are, to an extent, in line with traditional ones. The values and agendas are different but the attitudes are much the same. In the past, the Southern elites looked down on 'white trash'. Many of them favored House Negroes over poor white farmers. Today, southern white elites virtue-signal by saying, "WE GOOD REPENTANT southern whites are NOT like those lowlife redneck vermin who still wave Stars & Bars and revere Stonewall Jackson. We suck Negro dong, kiss Jewish ass, and bend over to globo-homo power." Same old elitist attitude in different dress. But even white southern masses are changing. Their religion is football dominated by blacks who thump white guys and hump white girls. In integrated schools, many white guys got beaten up by black guys and cuck to blackness as in their pathetic roles as worthless 'whiggers'. And as rap music is big among white southern boys, they imitate blacks and no longer resist jungle-feverization of white women. They are finished. And there is mass immigration of yellows and browns who mostly vote Democratic. The South is really over. Same with Texas, now a land of cuckboys than cowboys.

In the end, while anything can be accused of treason, the sting of accusation sticks ONLY WHEN made by those in power. If the British had won, Benedict Arnold would have been honored as a patriot who served the crown while Washington and Jefferson would have been hanged as traitors. But the Revolutionaries won, and Washington became the Father of the American Republic whereas Benedict Arnold, at least in US history, became synonymous with 'traitor'.
So, 'treason' is one of those power-words. It gains full meaning only if made with the power to back up the accusation with penalty. In a way, all of today's deep state elites are treasonous. US elites don't serve the US. They are globalists whose main loyalties are to the oligarchic matrix of Jewish supremacist power, multi-national corporations, imperialist military-industrial-complex, the cult of Negrolatry, and globo-homo-mania as the new messianic neo-religion of the West. The Russia Collusion Hoax was one of the greatest acts of treason in US history, but it was presented as the ultimate patriotism against Donald Trump, the treasonous puppet of evil Vladimir Putin or Putler. So many people in the Deep State should be sent to prison or even executed for their plot against Trump who came to the presidency by fair election — if it was unfair, the wronged side was Trump and his supporters, but Trump still managed to eke out a win. But notice the Deep State spins a different tale, and it has the power to protect 'made' people. Just like Wall Street scum never faced justice after the 2008 fiasco, virtually everyone involved in Russia Collusion Hoax will be protected and continue to control America.

Men like David Patraeus are traitors. They don't defend or serve America. They serve Jewish supremacist imperialists and work for the kind of power that encourages Christian churches to drape themselves with 'gay pride' colors. In aiding and abetting Zionist 'genocide' of Palestinians and Wars for Israel(that target Muslims and Arabs), these men are actually even violating the principles of 'anti-racism' that they claim to represent. They say US must redeem its 'racist' past, but they have a strange way of going about it by aiding Zionist 'racist' terror against Palestinians, Arabs, and Iranians. So, 'treason' isn't about truth or justice. It's about who has the power, who gets to decide the political premise and 'moral' foundation, and who has the means to not only accuse others of treason but to use the power of institutions to make the charges stick.

In current US and EU, the highest 'loyalty' and greatest 'patriotism' are about cucking to Jewish supremacism, worshiping globo-homo queertianity, and kissing the black ass as magical. If you defy such notion, then you're treasonous. But then, being accused of 'treason' by vile Jewish supremacists and globalist cucks should be a honor. One should NOT be loyal to such evil powers. Today, the weasel globalist-generals who serve a globo-homo-ized US military that is used to promote Jewish Supremacism and Jungle Fever/Faith dare charge the great Robert E. Lee, a loyal son of his beloved Viriginia, of treason. With Jews, You Lose. Whites were fated to lose everything when they ceded their power and authority to Jews.

Now, a question. Suppose Southern States had more people and a bigger economy than the North in 1860 and suppose the Northern States seceded from the Union and Southern States waged war to restore the Union. Would the Northern States have committed treason?

Relativity of Treason — How Donald Trump is both a Traitor and a Patriot

Following the summit between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin, the Jew-run Mass Media have gone bonkers in smearing Trump as some kind of unprecedented traitor. This was to be expected because the entire Russia-Collusion-Hysteria had been engineered from the get-go to prevent the meeting of Trump and Putin. But Trump being Trump, he decided to meet with Putin and discuss important matters as World Leaders. Trump knows(and we know and even enemies of Trump know deep in their hearts) that the Russian Collusion thing is the biggest hoax in US history. It was essentially concocted by Jews and MIC(military-industrial-complex) to prevent a rapprochement between the US and Russia. There are reasons why Jews and MIC want to antagonize Russia. For Jews, it’s ethnic hostility rooted in historical animus and tribal greed. As Jews control the media and Deep State, they control the Narrative and get to define ‘American Interests’ which essentially comes to "Is it good for Jewish supremacism?" and "All Americans must like whatever Jews like and hate whatever Jews hate." Jews get to decide our loves and hates, and that means we are to be denied Emotional Autonomy. We must be like dogs that take emotional cues from their master. As for the MIC, they need Russia as the Evil Enemy in order to justify their budget for warmongering. There are other anti-Russian elements too. Globo-Homo degenerates hate Russia because of its restoration of nationalism and traditionalism. Pathologically vain self-worshiping Homos and Trannies want all the world to honor, celebrate, and praise their fussy-fancy ilk. And power-porn elite-educated mafia just love the game of power, and they figure Russia is the most credible rival in the world, especially as Jews have given green light to hate and revile Russia. For them, what counts is the sheer nihilism of playing The Game.

Anyway, the question of Treason is never a simple one because the logic of Treason and Loyalty is always relative. Consider the film CHARIOTS OF FIRE. The Olympic runner must choose between God and King. In choosing God, he is seen by some as snubbing and disrespecting the king. But to the sprinter, it is a higher loyalty. Similar conflict unfolds in the film BECKET where Richard Burton as the eponymous character must choose between loyalty to his friend & king AND a higher sense of duty.


James Comey himself reiterated the problem of treason with his book HIGHER LOYALTY. Comey violated FBI rules and conspired against the President. As such, he is a traitor to the Bureau and to the President. But Comey insists he acted out of a higher loyalty. To what? Truth and justice? To globo-homo agenda? Or to the nihilism of Deep State wrapped in bogus moralizing? In the film THE WILD BUNCH, Pike Bishop(William Holden) defends his estranged ex-friend Deke Thorton(Robert Ryan). Though Thorton is on the hunt for his former outlaw partners, he’d given his word to the Law. Dutch Angstrom(Ernest Borgnine) counters Bishop’s defense of his old friend by insisting that the ‘word’ isn’t enough; it’s whom you give it to.

In RAN by Akira Kurosawa, there are multiple layers of meaning whereby apparent treason might be a deeper loyalty and seeming loyalty could be concealed treachery. The youngest son who’d spoken bluntly against his father was the loyal one. The older sons who spoke with devotion and respect were out for their own power and even willing to destroy their own father. The biggest traitor may be Lady Kaeda who conspires to have the (Hidetora) Ichimonji clan destroyed from within. But in another way, she is also the most loyal character as she’d remained true to her own clan that had been vanquished by the Ichimonjis. As the wife of lord of the Ichimonji clan, her machinations were clearly treasonous. But she’d never forgotten or forgiven the fact that the clan she’d married into destroyed her own family.

And in NIXON, Oliver Stone dramatizes how there are competing factions behind any politician, and each faction represents its own vision of what America should be. And as a politician relies on support from various factions with conflicting interests, his loyalty to one can easily appear as betrayals to others. Especially a nation as big and complex as the US cannot have a single easily definable formula of ‘America’ or ‘American Interests’. Usually, those at the Top(especially in media, academia, law, and politics) get to decide what America is all about. Indeed, Americans cannot even agree on the heroes and villains of history. If Jews can help it, all the monuments to White Southerners will be torn down while all white people must be made to worship MLK, the Negro who sold out the Palestinians because Jews filled his pocket with money.


So, what is Treason? What is Loyalty? It’s all relative. Take Benedict Arnold, denounced as the biggest traitor of the American Revolution. But couldn’t one argue that the Revolution itself was an act of treason against the Mother Country of Britain and to the King? From that perspective, Arnold's treason was an act of loyalty to the Crown. (The Spanish Civil War was especially confused because the Leftists who were 'loyal' to the Power were radicals hellbent on turning Spain upside down with communism and anarchism, whereas the rebel forces were committed to maintaining Spanish Tradition.) Of course, the Founding Fathers argued that their higher loyalty was to independence, freedom, and dignity of man. Some have argued such were mere rosy words to cosmeticize what was essentially a naked power grab by the landed gentry of the Colonies who wanted supreme power in their own hands. Granted, the example of George Washington shows that the Founders weren't out to be the New King. Rather, what they envisioned was a new kind of aristocracy, the ‘natural aristocracy’, that would be made up mostly of themselves and their descendants who were deemed to be superior in intellect and knowledge. Though Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson are usually seen as ideological opposites, both were elitist in their own unique ways. The difference was Jefferson’s style was that of an agrarian aristocrat whereas Hamilton was more urban in his disposition and preference. Jefferson thought more like a nobleman whereas Hamilton thought more like a monarch. (Oddly enough, the two styles would be wedded together by Andrew Jackson, a crude man of low origin.)
The rise of modernity and rapidity of change made the issue of loyalty and treason increasingly more difficult to resolve. It's difficult to be loyal to anything when so much is changing so fast all around you. Constancy became obsolete.
The French Revolution was a rebellion against the King. Obviously, the Revolutionaries were traitors to the monarch, the nobility, and the Church that had defined France and French culture for so long. But the Revolution argued that the rulers no longer possessed the right to rule. The Enlightenment had revealed a higher form of justice. Also, rulers must serve the people than vice versa. To the extent that the Tradition made the French people serve the king, aristocrats, and the church(that were unresponsive to the needs of the people), it was in violation of the true Theory of Justice. Thus, treason against the Old System was necessary to bring forth a New System that was worthy of the loyalty of the people who were to be liberated and elevated. They would no longer be subjects and instead become free citizens of a republic. And then, of course the Revolutionaries fell into the lethal habit of accusing one another of treason to the spirit of the Revolution, a tragedy avoided by American Revolutionaries who were less radical and less threatened by foreign powers. Later, Russian Revolution would lead to tragedies that made the French Revolution’s failures look like a picnic.

Anyway, it isn't easy to ascertain who is traitorous or loyal because it depends on one’s perspective. Indeed, everyone could be said to be both traitorous and loyal. One’s loyalty to the Old Order is treason against the New Order, and one’s loyalty to the New Order is treason against the Old Order. And as the New Order soon becomes the Old Order, it also insists on blind loyalty and commitment. The issues of loyalty and treason have still not been resolved around the American Civil War. Though the North won the war, many in the South never accepted the Northern Narrative. Also, there had been a prolonged period when the North decided to effectively bury the hatchet and make cultural peace with the South, i.e. the North would maintain its favored Narrative and the South would its own. Live and let live. Let the North honor Lincoln and Grant. Let the South accept the fact of the Union but still honor men like Robert E. Lee and Stonewall Jackson. This noble understanding was subverted by Jews who, in seeking to totally cuck-castrate the white race into submission, have waged Total War on the Southern Narrative(which is ironic since Jews in the South had been mostly pro-Confederate).

So, what about Donald Trump? Is he a patriot or a traitor? If he is a traitor, we need to ask what he is a traitor to? Which America? After all, there is no single America. Surely, Palestinian-America differs from Jewish-America. Jewish-America sees BDS as traitorous, but Palestinian-America sees US support of Zionism as a betrayal of what 'America' should be about. And black-America hardly sees eye-to-eye with white America that has much at odds with Mexican-America. Many blacks revere men like Malcolm X who had harsh words for White America. And many whites in the South still feel affection for the Confederate flag that symbolized the South's rebellion against the Union. And whites and Mexicans(even Mexican-Americans) will remember the Alamo differently. Feminists, with the backing of Jew-run media, claim to represent Women's Interests. So, if women speak, act, or vote against the policies favored by Feminism Inc, they are said to be traitors to womynkind. Feminists say women must be more loyal to the Sisterhood than to their families. In reality, Power Feminists(like Elizabeth Holmes and Sheryl Sandberg) have more in common with Elite Men(especially Jews and globo-hustlers) than with lower class women without fancy careers, wealth, and privilege. The real conflict is between elite men/women and mass men/women. Feminists aren't out for equality. They want to rise high to be with and marry elite men.
And even within the same racial or ethnic community, there can be a wide divergence of interests. This is especially true among whites, among whom 59% generally vote Republican while the rest vote Democratic.Some white Republicans might see white Democrats as traitors to the race, while many white Democrats might see white Republicans as traitors to 'history' that will end when every corner of the world has been globalized with diversity and made Homo-Mulatto. Also, even though the US is a nation of 325 million people, only a relatively tiny share of the population has control over the media, academia, upper echelons of government, and the like. And they are the ones who usually get to decide what is what. They decide what ‘American Interests’ are. And they theorize what ‘America’ or ‘American values’ or ‘Western values’ are all about, and then they foist this formulation on all Americans via the mass media that are controlled mostly by Jews. Indeed, so much of the 'American' label is just a stamp or sticker for JEWISH power, privilege, and passions.
When we consider the people with the most power in the US(the Jews and Homos) and how they choose to define ‘America’, Trump is indeed a traitor to that ‘America’. The globo-homo elites are bored with nationhood. It's too petty and small for them. They want to play with and own all the world. They want the US to be not a fortress but an aircraft carrier. For them, Manifest Destiny continues with new wars, new propaganda, Homomania as the new missionary-crusade, Afro-worship as the New Cool, demographic imperialism, and spread of Jewish hegemony(with Anglos and Homos as favored sidekicks). Globalist elites of many nations pool their resources to gain control over the world, and all the masses of the world become mixed-up peons and helots with no right of identity, territory, or history. (Only Jews, especially in Israel, are to have that right.) The elites don't need a specified identity, territory, or history because they got what gives them the most jollies: Wealth, connections, privilege, and VIP status wherever they go. The elites speak of 'equality' and 'inclusion', but it's really just 'elititude', an invocation game of certain agreed-upon symbolism not unlike the practice of Christianity in aristocratic Europe; all those kings and noblemen hardly led lives that could be construed as genuinely Christian, but they didn't have to because they carried on with the symbolic rituals of sanctimony that shrouded them with the aura of piety. Elititude. Today, all those Western elites don't have to give up their wealth and rub shoulders with the wretched of the earth to be 'progressive'. They merely need to take selfies at a ceremony commemorating Nelson Mandela. How do you like them photo-ops by Bono with African children? After playing Pop Christ, he goes back to live in his mansion.

This ‘America’ that is favored by the Mass Media is not a sovereign nation but a jewel-in-the-crown of the real superpower in the world, the Empire of Judea(or EOJ) that has neo-imperialist globo-homo networks all over the world. Jewish power is connected via New York, Los Angeles, Miami, Atlanta, Chicago, San Francisco, Boston, London, Paris, Berlin, Warsaw, Moscow, Buenos Aires, Mexico City, Tel Aviv, and etc. Jews have powerful presence even in nations that are deemed as the enemies of the US. Jews are so powerful that even Russia, a nation that is constantly defamed by vicious Jews, must allow a bunch of Jews to hold great wealth and power. (Russians are spectacular underachievers who are so lazy, stupid, and incompetent that a handful of Jews have run circles around them time and time again. Indeed, consider the difference between the Russian Revolution and the German Revolution. Both turned out to be evil, but German Revolution of the National Socialists gained power for Germans against the Semites whereas the Russian Revolution led to the Semitic & non-Russian minority domination over vast numbers of Russian Slavs. Germans, being more capable, outmaneuvered the Jews, whereas Russians, being drunk and stupid, came under the rule of Jews who made up a tiny cabal. Alas, even though Germans were more capable, their recklessness led to WWII and their downfall, and Germans have never been able to regain their footing since. In a way, German conscientiousness came to be a thorn on its side. Though conscientiousness is generally a good thing, the relative lack of such among Russians seems to maintain their resistance to the Jews. Ironically, both Germany’s choice of National Socialism and Shoah-Guilt[or National Shame-ism] were the product of German conscientiousness. Overwhelmed by mounting poverty and degradation during the Great Depression, National Socialism seemed to offer an opportunity for Germans to rise up and do something hard and constructive to repair and rebuild the nation. It was National Will in action, and a people without conscientiousness couldn’t have chosen such a path. Germans, unlike stupid and lazy Greeks in the financial crisis several years back, were not bitching and asking for easy fix. They were willing to unite and work hard to restore German greatness again. This called for lots of work, unity, and collective sacrifice, and Germans were up to the challenge. So far so good. But then, the man the Germans put in charge, Adolf Hitler, turned out to be a mad visionary and degenerate gambler with history. Hitler exploited the conscientiousness of the Germans. He promised them a New Beginning based on hard work, sacrifice, and unity. Germans trusted him, and things seemed to be going well... until Hitler decided on imperialism, and then all hell broke loose. After the war, Germans chose the path of conscientiousness once again. They came to realize that their blind trust in Hitler-as-savior-of-Germany had led to a catastrophic war that not only destroyed millions of German lives but millions of non-German lives as well. Among the great horrors was Shoah, the killing of millions of Jews. So, Germans decided to be mindful and redeem themselves. If in the 1930s they’d put all their trust in Hitler, after WWII Germans increasingly put their trust in Jews as a holy people. When Jews didn’t rule the world, it didn’t much matter, but as Jews increasingly became the masters of the US, the most powerful nation in the world, Germans came under greater pressure to prostrate themselves before Jews as the Holy Holocaust Race that must be obeyed and worshiped like gods. And as Jews gained even more power, they went from rulers of the US to the rulers of the Empire of Judea, of which the US was the main prize. Flush with all this power, Jews are now in supremacist Judeo-Nazi mode, and they’re rabid with power.)

Given who really rules America and gets to decide what is ‘American’ or what are ‘Western values’, one could say Trump is indeed a traitor to this ‘America’. In the Brother Nathanael video above, it’s obvious that many anti-Trump voices in the media are Jewish. But then, the media are owned mostly by Jews. It’s an incestuous and inbred Jew-owned-and-run Media that hire lots of Jews to tell us that whatever Jews hate, we must hate too. Whatever Jews like, we must like to. Jews dictate to us what to hate, what to love. If Jews say it is American-as-apple-pie to support IDF death squad's killing of Palestinian protesters(calling attention to the fact that 2018 is the 70th anniversary of Nakba Pogroms that wiped Palestine off the map thanks to Jewish mass migration-invasion), then cheering for Zionist killers must be red, white, and blue(or red, white, and Jew). The so-called Mass Media offer us endless ‘two-minutes of hatred’, and according to Jews, Putin is the New Goldstein or Goldputin. According to the PC Narrative, one's willful deviance from this Agenda constitutes 'treason'. It's like a master shaming a dog as 'bad doggy' for refusing to fetch the ball or fight another dog.

Basically, the Mass Media is Hate News against whatever Jews hate and is Love Media for whatever Jews love(or thinks is useful to their supremacist power). All this Russia brouhaha is so much nonsense, and the ONLY reason it exists is because Jewish globo-homo imperialism hates nationalism or national autonomy/independence/sovereignty of goy peoples, especially whites. Jews are viciously hostile toward white Americans whereas Putin & Russia feel no such hostility. Jews are also hostile toward Russians. Because Russia refuses to obey Jewish Supremacists, Jews feel that Russia is 'hostile' to the Jewish Agenda; therefore, all of us(as obedient dogs) are also supposed to see Russia as hostile to us. According to Jewish logic, refusal to obey the Jewish globo-homo agenda is 'hateful' and 'hostile'. It's like Harvey Weinstein's sexual logic. Any woman who said NO to him was offending him than he was offending her. Like they say, "Jews cry out in pain as he strikes you." Jews lie about Russian Collusion when, in fact, they are the ones who colluded with Deep State and EU to get Hillary, their bitch-whore, elected. According to Jews, the only approved 'allies' of the US are its bitch-whore puppets like Japan, Canada, UK, France, Sweden, Mexico, Saudi Arabia, and etc. Any nation outside the orbit of US hegemony is friend or enemy depending on how JEWS feel about it. Jews are the final judge of which nations the US can be friendly with. Jews say Israel is America's closest ally, and that must be true because... Jews say so. Jews say Russia is the #1 enemy, and it must be so because... Jews say so. Jews are masters, we are dogs. Woof. Imagine someone who says he gets to decide who gets to be your friends or enemies. If you decided to find your own friends, he calls you a traitor to yourself. Jews are like the insane jealous lover in PLAY MISTY FOR ME who tries to claim the Clint Eastwood character all to herself. A truly vile people. Jews need to own the white race in order to sustain Jewish supremacism.

After all, Jewish supremacism depends on whites serving as horsey to the Jewish rider. Jews are to serve as the mind, and whites are to serve as the obedient body. Though Russia isn’t free of malevolent Jewish influence, it is freer than the US is. Paradoxically, Russians both fell under and resisted Jewish power more fully than White America did. If German conscientiousness made Germans both radically anti-Jewish under National Socialism and excessively pro-Jewish after WWII — in both cases, the Germans were trying so very hard to do the Right Thing — , the Russian lack of conscientiousness made them easily fall under Jewish Bolsheviks and later bluntly irreverent to Jewish power. After the fall of the Tsar and under the rule of the Provisional Government, the only thing Russians cared about was ‘land, bread, and peace’, or ‘what is in it for me?’ Most had no idea what was happening or didn’t care. They just wanted ‘my little thing’. So, Russian masses were willing to throw their lot with the Bolsheviks even though the latter was calling for national defeat to the Germans. Russian masses couldn't care less. They just wanted "what’s mine". Russian moral and intellectual laziness led to this morass, something that energetic and radical Jewish Bolsheviks took advantage of. Lack of Russian conscientiousness could be manipulated by Jews. But then later, this very trait worked against Jews. Upon Stalin's outmaneuvering the Jews and later when his heirs promised More Stuff to the Russians at the expense of Jews, the Russians readily accepted the bargain. Russians didn’t care if Soviet version of ‘affirmative action’ hurt smarter Jews. They were into "What’s mine?" than for higher principles and meritocratic fair play. Also, being less conscientious, Russians are harder to guilt-bait. Besides, communism made it difficult to guilt-bait most Russians. After all, communism said capitalism is evil. Most Russians never got to practice capitalism. If anything, even communist Jews had more savvy for enterprise and came to be associated with stuff like black markets. Also, WWII meant Soviet/Russian victory over Nazism. So, that meant Russians deserved moral pride over having defeated Nazi Germany. Against such mule-headed bluntness, it was difficult for Jews to guilt-bait and manipulate. It’s more constructive to work with ‘conscientious’ dogs than with boorish bears.
Post-Soviet Russia repeated this pattern once again. Because Russians were so lazy, stupid, and slovenly, clever and greedy Jews found it easy to manipulate the Russian economy and loot much of it in the 1990s while too many Russians were drunk on vodka or imitating American pop culture. If Russians had been more conscientious, like Germans or Japanese after WWII, it would have been more difficult for Jews to pull off such a stunt. But then, Russian boorishness and crudity turned into an advantage beginning in the 2000s. Emotionally gruff and rough-n-tumble in sensibility, Russians decided to say hell with Jews and their homo puppets. They said hell to 'liberal democracy' and what the globalists were hailing as the New Normal in the 'most evolved' progress. (Paradoxically, Anglos and Germanic types can fall for immorality-as-the-new-morality more easily because they are more conscientious. Most people don't think hard about right-and-wrong. They outsource such meanings to the elites and are mainly concerned with seeming to do the right thing in the eyes of the official power. They are more concerned with Moral Approval than Moral Thought. So, if the Power says 'gay marriage' is 'more evolved', Anglos and Germanic types try so very hard to appear More Moral and win status approval. In contrast, Russians, being less conscientious, are less concerned about seeming More Moral. So, they tend to be more oblivious to the latest Official Line. And yet, this outlook maintains genuine morality because it is less sensitive about keeping-up-with-the-joneses of morality-as-fashionable-virtue-signaling.) Russian rejection of globo-homo agenda was a morally important decision but not one that was made morally. Russians stumbled into moral action because things got so bad with Jews at the helm. They wanted a strong hand to rein in the oligarchs and gangsters, and that man was Vladimir Putin. Most Russians didn’t care what Putin did as long as he made things better. Lucky for them, Putin turned out to be rather sane and sound leader with good sense for things. Anyway, because Russians tend to be neanderthal in their ways and emotions, they are harder to psychologically or morally manipulate. Jews found it easier to gain power over lazy and stupid Russians but also more difficult to maintain control over them for the long haul because Russians are so disorganized, lazy, incompetent, and lacking in conscience. In contrast, Jews found it far more difficult to gain power over Anglos and Germans, a talented hardworking people with strong sense of moral pride. But once Jews gained an edge over them, they found it easier to manipulate them psychologically and morally because Anglos and Germans really care about the principles of right and wrong(or are obsessed about seeming to care about such things as a matter of status). In the short run, it was easier for Jews to take power in Russia but, in the long run, it was harder for Jews to keep the power because Russians just wouldn't play along as they’re too lazy, childish, boorish, and difficult. In contrast, Jews were met with truly stiff competition from talented Anglos and Germans. Thus, Jews required far more energy to gain dominance in their world. Jews gained supreme power in Russia in 1917. Jews gained comparable power only in the 1980s in the US. But once Jews gained power in the US, it was easier to keep because Anglos and Anglo-ized whites did a very good job of keeping things running for their Jewish masters.
After all, the very craziness of Russia in the 90s that enabled Jews to steal so much also led to the downfall or exile of many Jews. It’s one thing to grab a lot of loot, but unless there is law and order, it’s difficult for the looters to keep all their loot. Certain Jewish oligarchs of the 1990s met a fate similar to that of Jewish Bolsheviks in the 1930s in the Great Purge. Even though Jews grabbed so much power so fast in Russia following the October Revolution, the sheer lack of Rule of Law meant that what the Jews took violently and unscrupulously could be taken from them in the same manner by someone even more cunning and ruthless than them, and that man happened to be Josef Stalin the Georgian. Russia has always been a land of bandits, peasants, gamblers, and bear-wrestlers. Jews could get such people drunk and steal their wealth, but drunken mobs can easily turn on the very people who supplied them with the drink. Jews always played on lack of conscientiousness among Russians to gain power over Russians. Jews always saw Russians as idiots and boors to whom to sell vodka, either literally or metaphorically in the intoxication of the Revolution(communism) or Riches(privatization). But the danger was that Russians-as-boors might get pissed and go 'pogrom' on the nasty Jews.
In contrast, the US was the nation that once came up with Prohibition. And the Brits, even as they allowed the Jew David Sassoon to sell opium to China, banned the sale of opium in Britain itself. Therefore, if Jews played on lack of control and conscientiousness among Russians, they played on the strong sense of self-control and conscientiousness among Anglos and Anglo-Americans. Jews did the hustle on the Anglos. Initially, Jews were full of praise for White Anglo America. Jews flattered the Anglo-Americans for having created a nation better and more just than any in Europe. But that was a bait. After all, if the US was supposed to be so wonderful and great, why did it have such-and-such problems and why did US fail to live up to all its promises? So, what began as Jewish praise turned increasingly into Jewish condemnation of White America's failure to fulfill its true 'proposition'. And Anglo-Americans, especially the Episcopalian elites, being so conscientious and sensitive about their self-image as Good People, turned into moral putty in the hands of Jews(who rarely applied similar kind of critique on their own kind and power). Anyway, even though it was far more difficult climb for Jews to take over the US(than a nation like Russia), the victory has been more complete and total because (1) white Americans can maintain a system of Rule of Law that Jews can manipulate to their own advantage and (2) white Americans are earnest about their conscientious redemption and atonement to be ‘good people’ as, of course, to be defined by Jews who control the academia, media, and pop culture(which is the only remaining culture).

When we consider the US as a vassal of the real superpower in the world, the Empire of Judea, Trump is indeed a traitor. His rapport with Putin was an act of Treason to the ‘America’ as a prized colony of the Empire of Judea(or EOJ). While there are plenty of non-Jews who also denounce Trump’s summit with Putin, most of them take their talking points from Jews. In other words, Jews lead, others follow. If Jews were to change their tune tomorrow and say Russia is no longer a problem, most of these non-Jewish dogs will stop barking. In any power system, we must distinguish who’s the master and who’s the dog. In Stalin’s Soviet Union, it would have seemed that Stalin and all his men were equally united in their passion for or against something. But was it really a consensus? Or was it Stalin’s hatred that others had to agree with. So, if Stalin hated A, his henchmen also had to hate A. If Stalin then decided to love A and hate B, his henchmen would do likewise. Same logic applies to the US. Don’t mind the barking dogs. They lack agency. They will bark to the tune of their masters. As Jews rule the US, they get to decide what is to be hated. Jews hate Russia and Putin at the moment, so ALL OF US are supposed to hate along. And because most non-Jews in the Deep State and Mass Media won’t have a career unless they obey Jews, they also spout along. Sure, they sound sincere in their hatred, but so did the henchmen of Stalin and Mao. And of Hitler. Whatever the Fuhrer said, the Nazi henchmen had to go along with. Just about everyone in the American Deep State and Media has to APPEASE their Jewish Masters if he wants to have career, reputation, and status.

The rise of Russian Nationalism led to the slipping of Jewish monopoly power in Russia. The Russian masses decided to support Putin and Russian nationalism. Putin then lent special support to the Russian Church. Jews were alarmed by this and sought to counter the development with Pussy Riot and Homomania, but Russia said Nyet. This infuriated the Jews. In contrast, Jews were able to guilt-bait, castrate, browbeat, brainwash, and heart-worm American whites(and Western Europeans) into worshiping Magic Negroes, embracing cuckery, rejecting their own racial/cultural identity, remembering Holocaustianity, and celebrating Homomania. American Whites were told they have no identity or culture of their own, and even if they did, it must be bad because whiteness is ‘racist’ and must be destroyed. But Donald Trump, the Alt Right, and Populism began to turn the tide on the Jewish Supremacist Power. More Americans began to wake up to the Globo-Homo agenda. They came to be more aware of Jewish power. And even conservative white Americans who continue to have warm feelings for Jews and Israel increasingly said NO to social and political agendas favored by Jewish elites. And this is why Jews are all panicked about Russia. Jews are no longer worried about survival. They are addicted to supremacism. After all, Russia is friendly to Jews, and lots of Jews are fabulously rich there. Even as Jews denigrate Russia and spit on Putin, Russia and Putin have been nice, welcoming, and protective of Jews. While Putin moved against the nastiest Jewish oligarchs, he kept some of them around, and if anything, he’s come down hard on outspoken anti-Jewish elements in Russia. But that’s not enough for Jews who must have supremacism. Jews believe non-Jewish nations belong to them. Since Jews cannot take them over demographically like they took over Palestine, Jews promote mass invasion-immigration on all goy nations so that the native peoples will, under the Diversity regimen, lose their sense of identity, territory, and history. And then, Jewish globalist elites will find it much easier to penetrate and take over nation after nation, not least by exploiting the art of divide-and-rule among Diversity created by mass invasion-immigration.

While Trump is clearly a traitor to the Empire of Judea, he could be seen as a patriot to America that has been envisioned as a sovereign nation with a specific history, core demography, core cultural themes(mostly rooted in Europe), and well-established borders. According to this view, the Core Americans are the European settlers who conquered, founded, and built the nation. While non-whites did their part in the development of the US, America is essentially an extension of European Civilization, and in order for the US to remain that way, its core must be white-European, especially Northern European. Patriots believe that this America must be preserved. After all, America was not founded and built by the world. Rather, it was founded by a specific group of Europeans, and later, other kinds of Europeans adapted and assimilated to this Core America that was essentially Anglo-Germanic. It has been this success story that made the US a magnet for the rest of the world that was far less successful in creating nice societies. If indeed the US belongs to all the world and must become all the world, why should people of the world have to come to the US? If the US is not a specific nation but The World, then people around the world should just stay put because US, as the World, would hardly be different from the rest of the world. On the one hand, the globo-homo-pushers say the US is an ‘exceptional’ nation, but then they say the US must become like the rest of the world. If US is so exceptional, why must it become so much like the rest of the world? Or are they saying the world is made better if they come to the US and become ‘Americans’? But what would this ‘American’ be? If US no longer has a core demography, no core culture, and no core anything and if US is always reinventing itself with more and more Mass Immigration, what would make it so ‘exceptional’? Indeed, the US narrative went from 'immigrants from the world must assimilate to American-ness' to 'American-ness must assimilate to the world'.
Of course, Jews have it all figured out. The reason why Jews welcome more Mass Invasion-Immigration is because they believe themselves to the be smartest people. If Jews really believed that newcomers could take power from them, they would say NO to more Mass Immigration. Suppose Mexicans and Muslims have an average IQ of 130 and very pushy personalities. Suppose they were to come to the US, outsmart the Jews, and take over as New Elites. Would Jews really want More Immigration then? Of course not. Jews welcome more Mass Invasion-Immigration because they know the newcomers will only be their helots, servants, and new voters. Jews know the newcomers won’t be able to compete with Jews. Asians are smarter than most immigrant groups, but East Asians are too dull-in-personality to win against Jews-with-chutzpah. And Hindus are too exotic and weird for most Americans to accept as the New Elites. Indeed, Jewish Power works a perverse duality vis-a-vis whites. On the one hand, Jews berate and shame whiteness. Jews tell whites to know their place and not act uppity. But Jews also count as ‘white’, and that means they are more acceptable to whites as elites than other groups are. So, even though many whites may increasingly sense that Jews are pretty nasty toward them, they still regard Jews-in-power as whites-in-power since Jews officially count as whites. But many whites wouldn't feel likewise if a bunch of Hindus took elite power in the US. Hindus are just too exotic. And of course, Jews understand this psychology, which is why they don’t fear Hindus very much. And Hindus understand this too. They know that whites(and blacks and browns) are less likely to accept the 'dotkins' as New Elites. For one thing, it would be seen as cutting in front of the line as most Hindus in the US are relative newcomers. So, Hindus stick close to Jews in their attainment of power and privilege. They dare not try to gain the upper-hand over Jews. In this Jewish vision of America, more and more ‘immigrants’ means more underlings of Jews. While Mexicans can out-compete ‘white trash’ and Asians can out-compete white middle class, neither will be able to out-compete Jews. Jews are too smart. They are too well-connected. They are too tribal and viciously chutzpahstic. Also, even if they shit all over whites, whites would still prefer Jewish masters than non-white masters. At the very least, white Christians can remind themselves of Judeo-Christian Values and go on pretending that Jews and White Christians are brothers-under-the-skin even though Jews continue to kick them in the balls. Jews as New Elites seem like an alien power but not entirely because Jews and white Christians go back a long time. But if the US were to come under the power of non-whites, there would be far less support for the new elites among whites. Whites will take shit from Jews(and from blacks as Magic Negroes) but not from any other people. Even as Jews berate whites for not being sufficiently welcoming to MORE non-white immigration, they aren’t looking for to parity and equality between Jews and non-white immigrants. As far as Jews are concerned, the non-whites are merely Diversity army to be used against whites. Now, what if whites side with non-whites against Jews? Jews figure that won’t happen because whites, especially white conservatives, will always favor white Jews(no matter how nasty they are) to non-whites. This is the conundrum facing the American Right. Its racial consciousness leads to preference of ‘fellow white’ Jews over non-whites, but no group is as hostile and vicious toward whites in the West than Jews are. It’s like black bears siding with brown bears in the spirit of fellowship-of-the-bear against wolves and coyotes but being attacked most by brown bears that also welcome coyotes and wolves to beat on black bears too. Jews denounce white-consciousness as 'racist' but also rely on this 'racism' as it makes whites favor Jews over others. After all, most white conservatives tend to see Israelis as WHITE Jews and Palestinians as BROWN 'ragheads'. And it is why whites generally favor Jewish power over other kinds of power. Whites aren't bothered by College admission policies that favor Jews over Asians because Jews are seen as fellow whites. So, Jews are playing a contradictory game. They revile white consciousness as 'racist' but also subtly appeal to it to keep whites favoring Jews over non-whites(such as Palestinians in the Middle East and Asians in competition for colleges).

One thing for sure, Trump’s meeting with Putin sure smoked out the true nature of the Deep State. It is so totally Jewish or cucky-wuck. All this alarm about ‘evil Putin’ and Trump’s treason is about Jewish Supremacists demanding that the US remain as part of Empire of Judea than regain independence as a sovereign nation, like Russia and Iran. Jewish supergroup supremacist imperialism hates Russian nationalism and American nationalism because nationalism is anti-imperialist. Nationalism seeks autonomy and independence from imperialist domination. The Thirteen Colonies once belonged to the British Empire. When the Colonies declared independence, the British Crown and Parliament howled TREASON. The Colonies relied on the aid of the French to fight the British. (If Russia wants to help American patriots like the France aided the American Revolutionaries, why should we care? Did the Founding Fathers say NO to French aid on the basis that France was a monarchy?) At this point, the US is no longer a free nation. After the Cold War, Jews cemented their power as the supremacist element in the US, and they steadily and surely incorporated the US into the Worldwide Network of Jewish Supremacist Power. The US is now a colony of the Empire of Judea just as the Thirteen Colonies were once the possession of the British Empire. Just as the British Empire was furious with the uppity daring of the American Revolutionaries who declared independence, Jewish supremacists are freaking out over the fact that Trump and patriotic Americans(who’ve emerged from Jewish hypnosis) are effectively demanding independence and emancipation from the Jewish Supremacist Imperialism. According to Jews, ‘America’ must remain in the Image of Jewish Power. America must obey Jews. And especially White Americans must hate their own race & culture and cuck out to blacks and be ‘inclusive’ of unceasing non-white mass invasion that will reduce the historic core population of the US into a permanent minority. This is the Jewish vision of America, and it can only see Trump’s effort at rapprochement with Russia as a threat to Jewish domination. After all, Russia was once a part of the Empire of Judea but managed to tear itself free(though not entirely) from Jewish claws. If Russia could do it, why not the US? Why not the nations of the EU? If Russia is no longer a part of EOJ, why should the US remain a vassal? EOJ, more than NATO and EU, is the real curse of the world. Though Trump is coming under lots of fire, the sheer hysteria of the Jews is giving us a clear picture of who really rules America and what their real agenda is.
All patriots must be willing to be treasonous to the Empire of Judea. To be loyal to one's nation and people requires one to commit treason against the alien overlords. For Gandhi and Nehru to be loyal to the idea of Indian Independence, they had to be treasonous to the British Empire and refuse to serve as subjects and agents of British Imperialism.

Indeed, imagine the chutzpah of these Jews who make up 2% of the US population but deign to define what is 'America' and shove this concoction down our throats and up our anuses. These Jews, so nasty and lacking in self-awareness, seem to believe that America exists to serve Jewish vanity. Any vision of America that says NO THANKS to Jewish domination is deemed as 'treason'. Well, loyalty to nation calls for treason against globo-homo empire. Such is true patriotism. And we must praise Donald Trump for having tried against all odds against the vile and vicious Jews. He is wrong on many things, but his counter-chutzpah can be amazing.

Three Kinds of Treason: The Good, the Bad, and the Clueless — The West, the Rest, and Rebellion — James Comey the Scummy — Delusional Symbolic Morality of Justice Junkies

Let’s consider the three kinds of Treason(though surely there are other kinds). The first is a kind of higher loyalty directed by conscience and moral compass. The second is driven mainly by greed & opportunism(and cravenness). The third kind of treason feels like the first kind(an act of conscience) to the traitor but is actually manipulated by a devious power with lock on media and academia. In the modern West, many white people have found themselves in one of the three categories.

Generally speaking, ‘Treason’ is a dirty word. But it is also a relative concept. Benedict Arnold is considered to have been a traitor, but one could argue that the thirteen colonies were treasonous against the Mother Country and the King. Robert E. Lee was loyal to Virginia, but Virginia was deemed to be treasonous to the Union. Also, it wasn't unusual for a person to have divided loyalties. During the Civil War, a mother could find one of her sons fighting for the North and the other fighting for the South. Who was the traitor in the family?

And in a way, many great leaps of human discovery and advancement were the products of a kind of treason. Mythologies are filled with themes of righteous or liberating treason. Young gods rebel against older gods and take over the divine realm. Prometheus, half-man/half-god, betrayed the gods in stealing their fire and passing it to mankind. Christianity could not have been born without ‘treasonous’ Jews such as Jesus, Peter, and Paul whose conception of God’s will and design was seen as heretical, blasphemous, and intolerable to the Jewish community.
And America was born of Inspired and Idealistic Treason against the supposed Tyranny of the British Empire(and the Mother Country). All great revolutions were acts of rebellion, indeed treason, against the existing order. One could also say all of life is the product of treason. A daughter, the beloved of her father, goes off with another man and becomes his. The movie FATHER OF THE BRIDE illustrates the father’s ambivalence in giving his daughter away. (This may be a bigger problem when the groom is a man of another race, as in OTHELLO when the white hussy goes off with a blackamoor). And so often in life, the son finally becomes a man by standing up to his father in an act of defiance. Even as the father or father-figure resents such rebellion, there is also a sense of pride in the realization that the child has grown into a man and can finally think and act for himself. It is why John Wayne characters in RED RIVER and THE SEARCHERS come to grudgingly accept and even admire the younger partner as having grown into full manhood with a mind and will of his own. Without that element of rebellion against the father, a man will never be his own man. He will never be a wolf and remain a dog all his life.

Indeed, this was one reason why the West advanced far ahead of the East. In Asia, there was far greater emphasis on sons to remain obedient to their fathers and on subjects to remain loyal to their masters/rulers. In China and Japan, there was nothing worse than being accused of disloyalty and treason. And in India, the complex caste system demanded strict adherence to rules of social belonging and obligations. Anyone deviating from his caste duties could come under the harshest punishment. It was seen as treason against the cosmic will, the Karma.

Things were somewhat different in the West. While it also placed great emphasis on loyalty and fealty to kings, lords, church, and patriarchs, there was more leeway and wiggle room for individuality, independence, and liberty. Part of the reason was genetic. White people were innately less servile than East Asians. (If racial and cultural uniformity may have encouraged conformism in East Asia — people who look alike tend to think and act alike — , excessive diversity in India may have necessitated an iron regimen of conformism to maintain the order. Diversity + Freedom = Chaos. Therefore, to keep the peace among so many different ethnic groups, the spiritual-cultural order of India had to insist on the most obsessive adherence to core caste principles of Hinduism. If the Jewish Covenant spiritualized the ethnic uniqueness of the Tribe, Hindu Karma spiritualized one's caste obligations as a sacred duty. The Covenant united Jews in body and soul. In the most intricate way, Karma both separated and interwove the lives of so many castes of Hindus. Perhaps, Jews might have devised something like a caste system had they come to rule over vast numbers of gentiles but, unlike the Aryans who gained dominance over India, Jews were generally surrounded by far more powerful empires. Thus, the main obsession of Jews was preservation of their own identity. But in today's world, Jewish Supremacists have become the Master Race overlords in the World, and in the rapidly diversifying West we are seeing the rise of neo-caste-systems that are unavoidable with excessive Diversity. Earlier, Latin America already and organically ended up with a caste system even though such wasn't explicitly devised as had been in India long ago.) Another reason for the greater spirit of rebellion in the West owed to Christianity that said there is a Higher Power and Higher Truth than anything devised or known by man. Indeed, Christianity itself produced a rebellion called Protestantism that denounced the corruption of the Catholic Church. Catholic Church accused Protestants of heresy and treason, but Protestants accused the Church of having betrayed God.
Also, unlike pagan gods who weren't all-powerful and compromised by their failings, Christianity said there is only One God and One Truth; and Jesus was the Son of God, the Perfect Man sent to Earth to die for mankind’s sins. So, even as a European might serve his King or Lord, he believed there is a Truth and Justice far greater than any temporal master on Earth. As such, it was justified in the eyes of the righteous to betray one’s lord to serve the higher good and higher glory. Such a betrayal is at the center of BECKET where the eponymous hero(played by Richard Burton) betrays his friend(played by Peter O’Toole) and king for the higher truth. And in CHARIOTS OF FIRE, the devout sprinter believes he must go against God and Country to remain faithful to the greater glory of God.


Of course, a people who are overly rebellious and treasonous will cause social chaos and havoc. But a people who are overly servile and obedient will not produce the kind of individuals with the audacity to think differently. After all, all great change are bold acts of 'treason' against the status quo. To achieve the power of flight, one has to defy what most people presume to be impossible. A short story by Ray Bradbury, "The Flying Machine", surmises that China fell behind the West because its rulers and elites favored status quo, harmony, and continuity over leaps and bounds in history. So, even as the flying machine is marveled at, the inventor is to be put to death because his wondrous contraption violates the existing harmony. Such momentous leap in possibility may well upend the entire social order... indeed the kind that enveloped Great Britain in the Industrial Revolution. That was a profound rebellion against tradition and nature. Ironically, the fact that the Romantics denounced Industrialization’s war on nature and countryside in a poetic and passionate way shows that they too were imbued with the spirit of defiance. Industry defied nature with machinery, and Romantics defied machinery with imagination.

We can go on and on with many other examples, but the point is, even as Treason is usually regarded in a negative light, it(or an aspect of it) is intrinsic to every great change. In the Ayn-Randian myth-making, the great innovative hero can’t help but upset the existing order by envisioning something no one had thought before. As such, he is met with fierce resistance and opposition from conservative, conventional, or controlling forces that insist on continuity of established forms, ideas, and means.


For some people, an act of treason is a moral necessity. A famous example involved the German officers who conspired to assassinate Adolf Hitler. Though their plan was clearly an act of treason, the conspirators felt they must do something to bring an end to Der Fuhrer’s madness. (Those in the Deep State who are now conspiring against Trump may be seen by some as today's 'Good Germans', but if the German officers conspired against Hitler for his reckless warmongering that brought Germany to the brink of ruin, today's Deep State operatives are the warmongers who hate Trump because he spoke in favor of peace with Russia, no more Middle East wars, and limited nationalism than for boundless globalist neo-imperialist hegemony.) More recently, there was Edward Snowden who spilled the beans on the Deep State to expose its abuses and general contempt for the American public and other nations, even supposed allies. Of course, James Comey would have us believe that he too acted out of ‘higher loyalty’ to the greater good, but revelations show that his loyalty was to the Deep State. He is a sleazebag and slimeball, and one wonders how such a lowlife could have ascended so high in government. But then, it makes perfect sense because any kind of complex organization usually favors yes-men, toadies, ass-kissers, boot-lickers, and shmoozers over mavericks, free thinkers, and men of honesty. Comey’s combination of craven careerism and schoolmarm-ish moralism not only made him an ideal candidate to climb the ladder but the kind of fool who could easily dupe himself into thinking he is a real-life Atticus Finch. In fact, Comey was always a teacher’s pet whose horizons as careerist and pseudo-moralist never veered from the conventional path of what-to-do and what-to-think. It goes to show that intelligence and diligence are not enough to create a real human being. Comey is a classic company-man-type. He is a suit, an empty suit at that devoid of real soul and agency. He dutifully swallowed all the a-b-c’s of do-goody PC without question, led the life of a cucky-wuck hubby-and-dad, and climbed the ‘corporate ladder’ of the Deep State. Thus, for Comey the Deep State drone, it has always been all-for-the-company and in the spirit of PC ‘progressivism’, the verity and validity of which he never gave any consideration because his personality is of the type that never deviates from the path chosen for him by others.

In contrast, Edward Snowden, while no saint, really did embark on a course of action that took courage and conscience. One may argue Snowden was overly idealistic, naive, egoistical, or judgmental, but the fact is he fully understood that his life would never be the same after spilling the beans on the NSA. It would especially be risky because he would make Obama’s administration look bad. At least if Bush or McCain had been president, Snowden’s act of betrayal might have gotten sympathetic coverage from the ‘Liberal’ Media or the ‘Progressive’ community. But because he exposed the Deep State under Obama, almost all the powers-that-be in media, academia, and Deep State(all controlled by Judeo-Nazi Democrats) decided to collude to make his life as miserable as possible.
Snowden’s deed was clearly an act of treason but also an act of counter-treason as Snowden believed that the Deep State had betrayed the trust of the American people and the protections guaranteed by the Constitution. His act was truly that of higher loyalty. He didn’t do it for money, privilege, or power but to expose the truth of the Deep State and what it was capable of in not only spying on American citizens but subverting foreign nations, all the communication networks of which had been infiltrated or sabotaged by the US government. Snowden exposed that the US as the Lone Superpower functions not as a democracy but operates as a Deepocracy. Power and Righteousness(as the ‘exceptional’ and ‘indispensable’ nation) have not only corrupted but blinded the people in the Deep State to their own arrogance, corruption, and foulness. They are worse than organized criminals who, at the very least, know they are crooked scum of the earth. In contrast, all the vile deeds of the FBI, CIA, NSA, and the Pentagon are whitewashed with the conceit of the US as the necessary policeman, judge, and jury of the world.

Men like Snowden and Joachim Fest’s father(who refused to serve the Nazi regime) are relatively rare. Even people who want to do likewise haven’t got the spine to stick their necks out. This is understandable for obvious reasons in tyrannical societies where those suspected of treason or disloyalty could be locked up or even executed. Because Stalin destroyed even those who were loyal to him, a climate of fear gripped the USSR, and as such, few dared to say or do anything that carried even the slightest whiff of dissent. (Soviet government was bound to be paranoid and repressive because everyone involved in the creation of the New Order was radical, ruthless, cunning, devious, and subversive. Unlike the American Republic that was formed more-or-less by like-minded, like-cultured, and like-blooded Anglos, the 'Russian' Revolution was made by groups intoxicated with extreme ideology and/or extreme personality. Stalin knew it was either his faction or the other faction. And he knew about the nasty personality of Jews, which he countered with his Georgian-Caucasian bandit cutthroat cunning that totally blindsided Jews who thought they could outwit him.) But then, freedom + opportunity can also turn people into craven cowards. This may seem counter-intuitive because freedom and opportunity connote individuality, high spirits, and daring. But freedom and opportunity also mean possibility of great success in wealth and privilege. And those who become addicted to and defined by wealth and privilege become deathly afraid of losing their trophies and treasures by saying the ‘wrong’ word or doing the ‘wrong’ thing. Consider the sudden fall of Donald Sterling from grace and fortune simply because he told his mulatto mistress to stop whoring around too much with Negro ball-players. That's all it took to bring down someone that big. So, in a way, a very libertine America has created a class of uber-successful cowards and dorks. While they have the individual spirit and drive to make great gains in business or some endeavor, their addiction to success makes them fearful of bad publicity. Since one’s reputation is determined by the prevailing PC and the media(almost entirely controlled by Jews in the West), the rich and/or successful dare not step on the wrong toes.

So, the US is a paradoxical society where freedom to succeed has actually diminished freedom of thought among the very successful. If you can’t rise too high or make too much money, it’s no great loss to say the ‘wrong’ word and be demoted or fired. Suppose you have a job making $80,000 a year but get fired for courageously sticking up for your beliefs and have to settle for a job making $50,000. It’s a loss but not something totally momentous. But suppose you have an opportunity to make $100 million but could lose it all by saying the ‘wrong’ word... like Don Imus with the 'nappy-headed hos' remark. You’re likely to play it safe and just go along with the Official Dogma and Approved Narrative(that define who is respectable and who isn’t) to make the big bucks. Cucks make the bucks.
It is then no wonder that so many successful people just caved to ‘gay marriage’. As Jews control the media, academia, law firms, and government, they got to decide what is ‘more evolved’ and what is ‘hateful’ or ‘irrational’. Ill repute could lead to shunning by the ‘right kind of people’, and therefore, one learns to play along and go along... as the eponymous character intended to do in BARRY LYNDON to win favor among the aristocrats.

The second kind of Treason involves those without conscience. They will betray anyone just for personal greed. Take Paulie in THE GODFATHER who, it turns out, cut a deal with the Tataglias for extra cash. Guys like Paulie lack not only moral conscience but even the slightest modicum of honor. Real slimeballs, they will do ANYTHING to get ‘what is mine’. This is a characteristic commonly found among Southern Italians, Greeks, and Hispanics. Greasy and sleazy, such types are incapable of shame, let alone remorse, as they stoop to any level to get ‘what is mine’. They usually have the personalities of toadies and sidekicks. They are like the couple of hoodlums in MIDNIGHT RUN who serve as a foil to the pair made up of Robert De Niro and Charles Grodin.

De Niro’s character won’t take a bribe, and Grodin’s character got in trouble because he did the right thing(like Edward Snowden). In contrast, the two toady hoodlums will do just about anything to get ‘what is mine’ in their sordid world of crime and corruption. And the other bounty hunter, Marvin, is also a sleazebag. At one point, he is willing to sell the Duke(Grodin) to the gang boss for a million dollars. (He must be an Irish pig.)

The world has TOO MANY people who will betray their convictions, principles, and values just to get ‘what is mine’. The criminal world is full of them, but then, so is the legitimate world. People just love money, success, privilege, and pleasure at any cost. Look at the Mormons who preach morality but are always willing to cut deals with Big Money to rake in the dough. Mormons are fake moralists. Their clean-cut lifestyles create the impression of morality but really serve as a shield to hide all their materialist-driven compromises. Look at the total scum Mitt Romney. Or conehead Evan McMullin. But then, US elite society is filled with these careerist-opportunist liars who betray their core principles just to get ‘what is mine’. Just how is it that all those Republican Conservatives who supposedly believe in Family Values didn’t raise the slightest opposition to the agenda of Homomania? Where was their conviction?
The fact is they were mainly concerned with their careers in a nation where most top industries and institutions are controlled by Jews who can make or break anyone via the media that decree who is of good or ill repute. As Jews promoted Homomania as the neo-religion(even replacement for Christianity), even the most 'conservative' members of the GOP just went along because what mattered most to them was not courage of conviction but careerism and opportunity. Why open their mouths and risk losing lucrative careers as politicians(who rely on Jewish money and media coverage) and lobbyists and lawyers(upon leaving office).
Even law firms, now mostly controlled by the Tribe, only serve clients and cases deemed safe and ‘reputable’ by the Jews. So, the side that opposed ‘gay marriage’ in defense of True Marriage before the Supreme Court couldn’t get any support from top law firms. And top Jewish-run law firms are using all their resources to sue Richard Spencer and shut him down while truly courageous dissidents can’t get any representation.


Even though the second kind of Treason is crass and lowdown, at least there’s an element of honesty. Craven careerists and weasely opportunists know they’re just in it for the money, for ‘what is mine’. They betray morality, values, and principles to move up the ladder or feed at the trough. Now, people like Paulie in THE GODFATHER aren’t betraying principles or values because they got none. Paulie betrayed the Corleones, his employers, but he didn’t betray his own values because he’s utterly devoid of any moral sense. At Connie’s wedding, the Chico-Marx-lookalike-jerk mutters to himself about how he would steal the money bag if it were anyone else’s. So, a total slimebag like that has no sense of morality to betray. The most he can do is betray other people.

In contrast, there are many people who do have a sense of values but betray them out of material self-interest, social approval, or cowardice. If they’re honest, they will admit, at least to themselves and maybe close ones, that they’ve betrayed moral values for material values. If less dishonest, they will rationalize their compromises with all sorts of twisted logic. If truly dishonest, they will pretend that their act of betrayal was actually done out of realization of higher morality. A good example is Charles Murray changing his mind on ‘gay marriage’. The craven bald-headed fool caved to Jews and Homos, but he desperately tried to convince himself that his change of heart was brought upon by becoming ‘more evolved’. Not much better is Ross Douthat, the chunkheaded pompous Catholic jerk, who got down on his knees and begged for ‘terms of surrender’. In other words, he’d be willing to bend over and take it up the ass but please oh please, don’t force Christian bakers to make ‘gay wedding’ cakes. Some courageous Christian. And since when do Jews and homos show any respect or consideration for craven cuck-cowards like chunkhead Douthat? Opportunists like Murray and Douthat can rationalize all they want, but deep down inside, I know and they know that they caved under pressure because they don’t have the true grit, the kind of character that informed Joachim Fest’s father who refused to go along with the Nazis. Murray and Douthat are ultimately little more than putty in the hands of Judeo-Nazis.

Finally, the third kind of Treason is the most problematic. Suppose we apply the three types of Treason to white people. Let’s consider the first kind of Treason, that of higher loyalty to Truth and Honor. Suppose there is a white nation that is committing a grave wrong to a non-white nation. Suppose a white person in the white nation betrays his own nation and sticks up for the non-white nation out of moral conviction. So, even though he wants to be loyal to his nation, the great wrong compels him to stick up for the other nation. When Ron Paul and Pat Buchanan opposed the Iraq War, they were accused of treason by many Conservatives. But their ‘treason’ made a moral argument against what they deemed to be illegal and unjustifiable US actions. Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11, and the US had no legitimate reason to bomb or invade Iraq.
Now, let’s consider the second kind of Treason, that of craven opportunism, among white people. The most obvious example of this is all those white politicians and cuck-elites saying or doing anything, even at great harm to their own race and nation, just to win favors from all-powerful Jews. Whether Democratic or Republican, most white politicians, members of the Deep State, or big business will betray their own race and nation if serving Jews will further their careers or fill their pockets. They’ve grown so cynical and/or shameless in a debased Jewish-run nation of amorality that they don’t believe in anything but their personal status and prestige. Patriotism is gone in a US that is no longer a white nation. Faith is gone in a nation that is no longer about God but about holy homos. And morality is gone in a nation where most kids grow up to rap, trash, tattoos, and piercings. In such a fallen world, what is the only thing worth salvaging? Gimme ‘what is mine’.

The first and second kinds of Treason are easy to understand. The first kind is about higher morality and conscience. The second kind is about base desires. Though the first and second kind are different, they have one thing in common: Agency. The man of higher morality thinks and reasons on his own and comes to his own conclusion of what must be done. The man of base desires may not be admirable of character but, at the very least, he freely chooses to act out of craven greed.
But what about the third kind? It is marked by lack of agency. The person who practices the third kind of Treason is convinced that he or she is acting out of higher morality but is really nothing but a tool. Consider all the pussy-hatted white feminists or SJW-types into self-righteous supremacist vanity. They believe they are betraying the white race for the noblest reasons. They associate whiteness with ‘racism’, ‘white privilege’, patriarchy’, ‘xenophobia’, and etc. As GOOD white people, they believe that their anti-white stance speaks volumes about their higher virtue. After all, they’ve transcended base tribalism of us-versus-them and have chosen to side with rest of humanity in the name of Social Justice, Diversity, and Inclusion. The people afflicted with the third kind of Treason really feel this way. But do they have agency?

Of course not. Take James Comey, a race-traitor who serves the Jewish-controlled Deep State that is hell-bent on destroying White America. Comey may believe himself to be a goody-good white man with a ‘higher loyalty’ who counters white ‘racism’ to make for a better America founded on the principles of MLK’s teachings. But did James Comey, a man with a teacher’s pet personality and company-man's lack-of-imagination, ever dare to think outside the Box of what he was told by the media and academia? Did he ever ask hard questions about the Power? Did he ever notice that the Power is full of hypocrisy? Was he ever self-aware of the fact that he violated FBI codes of conduct to favor certain outcomes in service of End-of-History that insists on hegemony of US as the ‘indispensable’ and ‘exceptional’ nation, presumably because the US is about Jew-worship, Magic-Negro-and-Mandingo-Worship, and Homomania? Has there ever been a man so tall in body but so tiny in understanding? Still, one could argue that Comey-ism doesn’t really qualify as the third kind of Treason. His treachery could be categorized with the second kind. He is essentially an opportunist and company man. He may have deluded himself that his betrayal of Trump and the white race is about ‘higher loyalty’, but he’s always been about climbing the ladder and serving his own career. He may see himself as a kind of proggy Howard Roark, but he is actually pure Peter Keating. Indeed, had he grown up in Nazi Germany or Commie East Germany, he would have been someone like Adolf Eichmann, a yes-man who just swallowed the official dogma and followed orders.
Keep in mind that Comey violated the rules of the FBI not out of personal conscience(as Snowden did) but in total obeisance to Deep State power. The order came down to protect Hillary Clinton, and he did just that. Also, his meteoric rise in the agency suggests he was spotted early on as the kind of toady who will dutifully serve The Power above all. The Power controlled him in body, mind, and soul. And Comey was fine with that because his pathological personality wants to be accepted, approved, and appointed.

In contrast, there are white race-traitors who truly and sincerely believe that their treachery is for the higher good. They believe their Treason is of the first kind, a greater loyalty to a higher justice. They see themselves as above the brutish tribal politics of ‘us versus them’. They see themselves as possessing sympathy and compassion that too many tribal white ‘racists’ lack. Even when they are told that their positions will lead to White Genocide, they stick to the anti-white program in the conviction that whites must atone and pay the price for their unforgivable historical crimes. They feel so noble of heart and soul that they are even willing to sacrifice their racial-communal well-being for world justice. Also, unlike the Comeys, Hillarys, Bidens, McCains, and Bushes of the world, these race-traitors of the third kind of Treason have little to gain by spouting the nonsense that they do. They usually gain nothing by posturing as deracinated do-gooders. So, at the very least, they are not primarily opportunists and company-men like Comey or other such sleazeballs.

But they are nevertheless delusional moral morons because they lack agency and understanding of The Power and how it works. Indeed, it is doubtful if these clowns had a single independent, autonomous, or original thought/observation in their entire lives. Everything they believe and say is just druggy incantation of PC catechisms planted in their minds by Jewish-run academia or media. And the idolatry that governs their imagination is the product of Hollywood and Jewish-run music industry. Indeed, the narrowly selective nature of their social justice sympathies shows how utterly controlled by Jews they are. Because the West is so thoroughly Jewish-controlled, the general rule is "The more your views align with the agenda and narrative of the Empire of Judea, the more you are a tool of The Power." Because most Jews are Zionist, anti-white, Homomaniacal, pro-Mass-Invasions(to all nations except Israel), and promote interracism(with black men) for white women & cuckery for white males, the chances are you are a total tool and puppet of Jews if you, as a white gentile, also support those policies to a tee. Granted, there is a chance that you, all on your own, arrived at the same conclusions, but there is a greater chance of winning a national lottery.

The more you diverge from official dogma and narrative, the more you’re independent of The Power controlled by Jews. This is why Jews are using all their power to attack the Alt Right more than any other force. Alt Right is the most liberated and emancipated in mind and body from The Power. Paradoxically however, the further right you veer from the Alt Right, the more you’re likely to be an Unwitting Tool of the Jews because it is in the interest of Jews to associate any white identity politics as ‘nazi’. Indeed, the 14/88 and Neo-Nazi elements are not what Jews fear most. If anything, Jews find such lunatics and losers very useful as ‘bad optics’ to smear White Identitarians with. It is then not very surprising that some of the key leaders of Neo-Nazism have actually been closet-Jews. In Canada, Jews encouraged Neo-Nazis and skinheads to make a scene in order to use the ‘scandal’ to fear-monger and push for Hate Speech Laws. (Of course, Zionist Judeo-Nazi vitriol against Palestinians and Muslims is not deemed as ‘hate speech’.) This is why ADL and SPLC fear Jared Taylor far more than David Duke. Whatever Duke says, right or wrong, the Jews can always smear him as the ‘former Grand Wizard of the KKK’. But no such smear can be done to Jared Taylor, which is why Taylor has been banned from Twitter but Duke hasn’t been. And in the end, it is Mike Enoch’s intelligent and rational discussion of the Jewish Question that trigger Jewish Supremacists. Jews don’t fear the side of Enoch that larps as ‘nazi’ because Jews could always use it to smear the Alt Right.

This is why Ramzpaul had a point in bemoaning Alt Right’s flirtation with parodi-nazis like Andrew Anglin.

Even the slightest association of the Alt Right with ‘nazi’ element will be used by Jews to smear the entire movement. In contrast, New York Times can run sympathetic articles about Marxism and Maoism because (1) Communism was once a weapon of Jews to smash Christian Churches and to kill millions of Slavs and (2) Communism has been regarded as the main enemy and destroyer of fascism(though, ironically, Israel adopted a fascist conception of the nation-state, and former communist nations like China and Russia are now governed along lines that resemble fascist theory of power and history).

Anyway, one look at something like the Pussy March, and you know that all these deracinated and insipid race traitors lack agency. I mean, what self-respecting person imitates countless other minions and idiots whose idea of ‘social justice’ is wearing a ‘pussy hat’ or walking around in pussy costumes? All their chants and slogans are tiresome cliches spoon-fed to them since cradle. The sheer lack of coherence and consistency in their world-view proves how feeble of mind and weak of conscience they are. Their hysteria is not the outpouring of deep passion but desperation of people who must throw tantrums to again attention for their 'virtue' toy-playing. "Look Ma, I'm so goody-good." It’s like a crybaby who wants love, attention, and huggy-wug. Their movement is about tantrums of the Current Year, not deep passion for what really matters.

These people have hive-minds. Their morality is purely symbolic than substantive. So, the ONLY reason they opposed the Iraq War was because they hated Bush. The only reason they were silent about Obama’s wars and greater destruction in the Middle East and Ukraine was because Obama had the ‘progressive’ symbolism of being a ‘historic’ black president. Granted, there are plenty of such morons on the American Right as well. They supported Edward Snowden only because he made Obama’s administration look bad. But if Snowden had spilled the beans on the Bush regime, then many of those Rightard dolts would have hated him and called him a ‘traitor’.
Symbolic justice/morality is really a form of injustice. Consider Bradley ‘Chelsea’ Manning who was pardoned by Obama ONLY BECAUSE he’s a tranny. Because of the symbolic value of LGBTQ in the current PC, Manning got a get-out-of-jail-free-card. If not for that symbolism, he would have rotted away in prison for a couple of decades. And because of the symbolic value of Jews(and Jewish clout in law and government), Jonathan Pollard got pardoned and rewarded by rich Jews with a plush job. This man was a total traitor, but Jews take care of their own. Indeed, while Pollard was in prison, Jew-run Media always ran Christ-like photo of him.

And in the case of Charlottesville, Deandre Harris the thug was set free because his blackness has symbolic value. In contrast, Jacob Scott Goodwin who counter-attacked him for having attacked a white guy is facing ten years in prison. This is how Symbolic Justice works in PC-ruled US, one where illegal alien leeches are symbolized into sacred 'dreamers'. If your identity has symbolic value, you get ‘affirmative justice' points. But if you’re a white guy and totally innocent, you are attacked and persecuted even though it is YOU who have been victimized. Richard Spencer, for instance, is being sued by Powerful Jewish Law firms because he symbolizes ‘white supremacy’.
Now, we know how Palestinians feel. One of the biggest mistakes that white race made was sympathizing with Zionists over Palestinians. Whites thought that if they supported Jewish nationalism and identity, Jews would reciprocate and support white people. Instead, Jews decided to do to whites on a grand scale what they’d done to the Palestinians. The West is now turning into a giant West Bank. White voices are being silenced. White people are fired and destroyed. They are denied justice and representation. They are dehumanized by the Judeo-Nazi media and entertainment.


The fact that so much of Western ‘justice’ is now based on symbolism than substance is proof that most White Race Traitors are more dogs than humans. They have no understanding of anything except on the surface of which-group-is-deemed-holy and which-group-is-deemed-wicked by the Powers-that-be. Indeed, most Progs are too lazy and stupid to do any searching for themselves and just rely on either Jew-run MSM, Organized Education, or Hollywood(!!) for their impression of how the world works and what is happening. When a truth-teller on black crime like Colin Flaherty gathered up all the evidence of bad black behavior, the Jews-who-run Youtube took him down.

As far as Jews are concerned, reality is too triggering and undermining of Jewish supremacist power. To prop up their tribal domination, Jews need to favor symbolism over substance. Because Jewish supremacism cannot operate without White gentile submissivism and because White Submissivism cannot exist unless White Identity & Pride are paralyzed with ‘white guilt’ and white cuckery(before the Negro), Jews push the symbolism of the Magic Negro and Mandingo. The Magic Negro myth promotes the symbolism of blacks as the perfect children of the christian god(of course, the Jewish God favors Jews), a people horribly wronged by wicked and satanic whites who must atone forever. And Mandingo myth — it is time to replace TO KILL A MOCKINGBIRD in classrooms with MANDINGO the novel — says blacks are the true master race with more muscle and bigger dongs. So, there is the symbolism of blacks as noble victims deserving of white guilt & sympathy and as nature’s true aristocrats, the authentic race that must be worshiped by slow, dweeby, and flabby white boys who should surrender their women to the superior black men.

Now, if we sweep aside the bogus symbolism, a more sensible view would be, "Yes, it’s true that blacks were once enslaved or discriminated against in the US, and it is also true that blacks are more muscular and tougher than whites." So, what does that mean in the real world? It means blacks can kick white ass. It means black thugs are filled with arrogance and contempt for the ‘faggoty-ass white boy’. It means blacks don’t believe in equal dignity with the white race but feel that white wombs exist to be colonized by black seed and white boys' faces deserve to be smashed by black fists. It means black males see white males as ‘white boys’ who should suck up to blacks. In other words, it’s a clusterfuc* of complexity with no easy solutions.

But do NOT expect the SJW self-righteous-supremacist types to be aware of anything. They have no idea that their anti-white treason is a programming coded into their minds by Jewish Supremacist globalists, the real terrorists of the World (Dis)order. They just go for symbolism of black holiness... just like plenty of idiotic ‘conservatives’ on the so-called ‘American Right’ fixate on the symboism of Jews as a Holy Holocaust people who can never do any wrong... which is why Pat Buchanan has to school that idiot Sean Hannity on why Bibi Netanyahu is so full of shi*.

Anyway, the third kind of Treason is about the controlled minds of pets and dogs of PC. There is no agency, no real conscience, no true understanding of what is what or what is really happening in the world. It is about being addicted to the feeling of holier-than-thou, more ‘evolved’, more ‘righteous’, and pure-of-heart(which is hilarious when your average prog is a total degenerate). They are really more like crack addicts or sugar-junkies of delusional justice. They are Justice-Junkies whose idea of right-and-wrong has been totally implanted in their minds through electronica controlled by heinous Judeo-Nazis who continue to destroy Palestinian lives.
Granted, there are some people on the Left or Progressive side who are awaking to the bogusness of Russia Hysteria Conspiracy narrative, the corruption of Neo-Liberalism, and the urgency of Palestinian calls for justice. They also realize that Obama’s foreign policy was essentially a continuation of Neocon nuttery under Bush because, after all, there is no real difference between Zionist Neocons and Liberal Zionists who, in essence, play Good Cop and Bad Cop to fool the world.