Nationalism is the best defense against imperialism.
Nationalism means a people minding their own business. It means having national sovereignty and respecting the sovereignties of other nations.
Imperialism, in contrast, means trampling on the rights and independence of other nations.
If National Socialism had remained in nationalist mode, it wouldn’t have disrupted the world order. But it went into imperialist mode and trampled on and violated the rights of self-determination and self-rule among other nations.
Initially, Japan modernized for nationalist reasons. Threatened by British and American imperialism, it emulated Western science & technology to defend the homeland. But it went from nationalism to imperialism upon the realization that the great powers were conquering and dividing the world among themselves. In order for Japan to compete and command the respect of other great powers, it too entered the imperial game. Furthermore, the UK and US, two imperialist powers, welcomed Japan into the imperialist club as a counterbalance to expanding Russia and unstable China.
Prior to the emergence of modern nationalism, much of the world had been divided among the great powers with little regard for established borders. Indeed, it had been so since time immemorial. Power and might decide the boundaries and limits of power. So, Persians conquered and laid claim to huge swaths of territory, even areas inhabited mostly by non-Persians. Same with the Romans, Mongols, Russians, Ottomans, and the Western European empires. There was no established principle in the world that insisted on a Basic Right of security, ownership, independence, and self-rule. Jews did have the concept of the Covenant and Holy Land(promised to them by God), but this ‘right’ meant nothing to the greater empires that dwarfed the Jews.
Security could only be assured by might. There was no universal ideal or international law agreed upon by all the peoples of the world. And no global institution existed to enforce higher principles. For most of history, peoples were too busy conquering, defending, adventuring, or discovering to think in terms of universal political morality for all humanity. If a kingdom or state was sufficiently powerful and ambitious, it could embark on invasions and control of more territory. It was about grabbing more and more until met by an equal or greater force or exhausted of resources.
But then, there was the rise of modern nationalism in Britain, France, the US, then followed by Germany, Italy, and Japan. Modern nationalism was a noble development insofar as it obligated the national elites to represent, serve, and defend the national people AND ignited the nascent idea that a nation had a RIGHT to land, security, and independence. Nationalism made national autonomy a right in terms of ideals and principles. Indeed, the main theme of the American Revolution was the idea of the colonists right to break away from the British Empire and establish a free and independent nation-as-republic. Even kings and noblemen who’d resisted the French Revolution and defeated Napoleon eventually adopted the nationalist model as a means to modernize and unite the populace, who went from being subjects of monarchs to the ‘free people’ represented by monarchs.
However, due to the long legacy of imperialism(stretching back to the beginning of history itself) and the relative backwardness around the world, modern nationalism inherited the ambition for empire-building. This led to a contradiction. Even as nationalism defended the homeland from other nations and empires, it sought to expand its own imperial base. So, Japanese nationalism went from defending Core Japan to conquering and claiming other lands that were non-Japanese. Earlier, the British had gone from securing an Island Nation-Kingdom to conquering other territories that would eventually constitute a gigantic world empire. Though a nation born of independence from the British Empire, the US went from creating a new nation out of the wilderness in the New World to searching overseas for imperial domination, especially after the defeat of the Spanish Empire.
Western Imperialist expansion was hardly unique as most of the non-West was no stranger to the imperial mode of constant invasions and counter-invasions. The non-West however lacked the nationalist ideal of (1) elites-and-peoples bound by historical and cultural covenant(which would have made foreign invasions more difficult) and (2) the political principle of the rightness of national autonomy and self-determination. Their political philosophy was essentially might-is-right. When the Brits invaded the territories of what came to be known as ‘India’, they merely usurped dominance from the Muslim Mughals.
But, World War I and especially World War II dealt a serious blow to the imperialist model. Nazi imperialism and Japanese imperialism, following the second world conflict, were not only defeated at huge cost but denounced as epitomes of evil. Also, it wasn’t long before almost all Third World folks demanded their own national independence, waged wars of liberation, and eventually expelled the European imperialists(sometimes with moral support from the US or the material support of the Soviets). And the Vietnamese fought a long hard battle to drive the US from what had once been ‘Indochina’. Granted, much of the Third World demand for national independence was possible only as the byproduct of global transformation by the European powers that, via modern communication & transportation, as well as archaeology and education of the local elites, instilled a new consciousness among the non-West of a larger sense of collective identity, unity, and pride. In many cases, the very ‘nations’ seeking independence were the creations of Western Imperialism, such as Indonesia, much of the Middle East, and all of Sub-Saharan Africa.
With the end of WWII, there was the gold standard of Universal Nationalism. The new consensus was that EVERY people deserved to have a safe and secure homeland. Such an ideal had been expounded by Woodrow Wilson following World War I, but it didn’t go far because the Great European powers weren’t about to abandon their empires, without which they’d lose their great power status as their homelands were limited in territory, resources, and population. And as the West set the template, Japan was determined to have an empire too. This all came crashing down after the horrors of WWII in which Europeans themselves suffered the ignominy of imperialist domination and rule under Nazi Germany(followed by Eastern Europeans under Soviet domination, though in a way, Western Europeans, though freer and richer, fell under US hegemony, which lasts to this day and, following the end of the Cold War, expanded to the borders of Russia.)
Due to the Imperialist Legacy, modern nationalism developed as nationalism + imperialism for some nations. If some European nations were content to remain and defend their own territories, others had embarked on imperial ventures long before the rise of nationalism. Thus, French nationalism inherited the French empire and valued it as a source of prestige and power. This was a system of ‘Nationalism for me, but not for thee’. The modern British and French were proud nationalists at home but sought to suppress and crush nationalist consciousness in their subject peoples though, contradictorily, their extensive archaeological studies of other cultures led to a reawakening of historical memory and pride among the locals. Consider Angkor Wat in Cambodia and the Pyramids of Egypt.
But with the eventual fall of empires following WWII, the new template was “Nationalism for me and for thee.” Let each and every nation, big or small, powerful or weak, rich or poor, be free and independent. And this was to be a moral right. In the New Order, the richest, biggest, and most powerful nation had no right to conquer and claim a small, weak and poor nation. At the very least, as a matter of principle, even the biggest nation and smallest nation were equal in its universal right to national self-determination. After all, there was a reason why the world body of international law came to be known as the United Nations than United Empires. And the Cold War provided some degree of protection for the weaker nations, e.g. the Cuban Revolution couldn’t have survived without Soviet support, and the Southeast Asian nations leaned to the US for protection against subversion from Red China, while North Vietnam relied on the support of the USSR and China to fend off American Neo-Imperialism. And as long as the Soviet Union existed as the other superpower, the US thought twice about getting entangled in the Middle East.
In the post-WWII era, many progressives and liberals were supportive of the national liberation struggles in Vietnam, Algeria, and Cuba for independence and autonomy. And when Soviet tanks rolled into Czechoslovakia, it was the last draw for many Western Leftists who denounced it as a communist form of imperialism.
Still, the US and USSR towered over the world as the two great empires. Of course, neither admitted that its version of world domination was imperialistic. Soviets insisted their hegemony was about the brotherhood of man under communist ideology. And the US claimed to serve as the defender of the Free World. And, if their apologists did detect elements of imperialism in the US or Soviet world order, they argued it was different from the Bad Old Imperialism. It was imperialism-as-necessary-evil against either Communist Tyranny or Capitalist Exploitation. So, even if Pax Americana was an empire, it was a noble containment strategy against the insatiable fanaticism of communism. Or, the Soviet empire was praised for lending support to peoples around the world seeking independence from the exploitation by Western capitalism(via ‘neo-imperialism’). At any rate, the assumption was that the justification for imperialism-as-necessary-evil would fade once the Evil Empire(communist or capitalist) finally vanished from the world.
Eventually, the Cold War did end with the collapse of the Soviet Union and the emergence of nations no longer under the Soviet-Russian yoke: Lithuania, Estonia, Georgia, Poland, Hungary, Czechoslovakia, and etc. It appeared that universal nationalism came to prevail over Soviet Imperialism. Russians(under the supervision of Jewish globalist carpetbaggers) now ruled over Russia, not over other peoples with their national autonomies restored.
With the end of the Cold War, many people, Americans and non-Americans alike, hoped that the US empire would wind down as well. After all, the Imperial Uncle Sam had been justified on grounds of containing and, if possible, rolling back the Soviet empire. With no more Soviet Empire, what need would there be for the US empire?
Maybe just maybe, the US empire could have come to an end, and America would have returned to the nationalist mode: The US minds its own business, and other nations mind their own business, and, as good neighbors, all nations trade with one another, share ideas, and communicate. Fences make for good neighbors. And, bridges among nations are supposed to facilitate the transport of ideas and goods, not to allow for mass migration and neo-colonization.
But three developments kept the US in the imperial game.
1. The US got filled with the hubris of End of History. Having won the Cold War, the American elites thought the American Way was the only way. In terms of political philosophy, mass culture, economic theory, and military prowess, the idea was that America, as the ‘exceptional’ and ‘indispensable’ nation, has the right to ‘lead’ and ‘defend’ the world. “If you’re not with us, you’re against us.” My way or the highway.
2. The West’s cult of mass immigration as not only an economic necessity but a moral imperative resulted in all-out mass invasions of white nations by the Third World. This had a profound impact on world consciousness as nonwhites, who’d previously demanded and fought for nationalism and independence, came to devalue nationalism in favor of a new kind of imperialism, a globo-mutual-imperialism. As nonwhites figured it is so much easier to have a good life by moving to the West than by working as patriots to reform and develop their own nations, they effectively became champions of demographic imperialism and mass-colonization. The West was given carte blanche to militarily occupy, financially dominate, and culturally influence most of the world in exchange for opening its borders to the whole world, thereby allowing the children of non-white immigrants to rise up and attain status and stake in the US-led world order.
Once, like Fareed Zakaria or Nikki Haley, they gained elite positions in the West, they became cheerleaders for the globo-imperialist warmongering against non-white peoples. After WWII, peoples in the Third World sympathized with one another in what they regarded as a common struggle against White Imperialism. But in the Age of Globalist Empire, nonwhites who rose up the ranks in the West came to function as servitors of the Zionist-controlled Empire against non-white nations. Having been groomed & appropriated by the West(that serves the Empire of Zion) and flush with status & privilege, the likes of Haley and Zakaria are more than happy to cheer on the bombing of nations like Libya, Syria, Iraq, and etc.
As for the EU, by some estimates Brussels is already one-third Muslim and is expected to become majority non-white in a few decades. As nonwhites settled in the West, they identified neither with their nations-of-origin or with white Westerners. Many came to exist in an ideological limbo of globalism, a kind of Universal Imperialism. Take Francis Fukuyama, the man who announced the triumph of ‘liberal democracy’ as the End of History. He’s no longer Japanese in any meaningful sense, but he’s not part of the White West either. He resides in the lala-land-of-the-mind called End-of-Historia. And Amy Chua feels as a member of what she calls the ‘supergroup’.
Perhaps, one reason why former imperialist Western nations became so pro-immigration was their subconscious desire to justify past imperialism. After all, imperialism once spread diversity around the world (permanently in Latin America), and the anti-imperialist impetus was essentially anti-diversity. Algerians and Vietnam eventually rejected and resisted the Diversity of European colonizers, just like Palestinians did everything they could to stem the flow of Invasive Diversity of Zionist colonizers. And Tibetans certainly aren’t happy about the mass-migratory Diversity of Han Chinese who keep flooding into Tibet. Anyway, by welcoming demographic imperialism from non-white nations, former white imperialist nations could be subconsciously defending their past imperialist record of having imposed Diversity on subject territories that could not say NO to the well-armed European colonizers and their collaborators… like Hindus who followed in the heels of British Imperialists into Africa and Southeast Asia. Diversity = imperialism. Homogeneity = nationalism.
3. Another reason why the US empire grew bigger and more aggressive was because Jews became the new ruling elites of America. Why did this matter? Because Jewish power is essentially and intrinsically imperialist. As Jews are a minority elite in the US, they don’t identify with most Americans who are seen as dumb and filthy goyim, the untermensch. Jews regard themselves as superior to goyim and mainly identify with other Jews in other nations. So, from the perspective of Jewish supremacists, gentile nationalism is feared and loathed as independence and autonomy from Jewish Hegemony, just like the British Imperialists regarded the nascent nationalism among the American colonists as a threat to British Imperialist hegemony. Jews fear and loathe gentile nationalism as an hindrance to Jewish globalist networking for Jewish supremacist hegemony. After all, if goyim put their own people and culture first and foremost, their nation would take precedence over Israel and Jewish interests.
Jews are like the British imperialists who feared the rise of nationalist consciousness in Third World nations. The British elites didn’t feel an affinity with the native majority in any of the subject domains. Their affinity was with the Mother Country and to the network of British Imperialists around the world. British Imperial power could sustain itself only by making the subject peoples mainly ‘identify’ with British Imperial prestige than with local national concerns.
Kenyan nationalism meant Kenyans asserting authority against the British rulers. It meant Kenyans should defend and serve their black identity in their own nation than the global ambitions of the British imperialists. Indian nationalism meant the brown people of the subcontinent demanding self-rule & self-determination and, furthermore, asking the Brits to leave. As Gandhi said:
If the British were about ‘Nationalism for me but not for thee’(or imperialist-nationalism), Gandhi was about universal nationalism, or ‘Nationalism for me and for thee’. The British feared universal nationalism as a viral threat to their own brand of imperialism, one in which only the British had national independence as well as imperial pride. After all, if every non-white domain(or Ireland for that matter) of the British Empire insisted on national autonomy, how could British hegemony be sustained?
Today, Jews think and act like the British imperialists. Most Jews don’t feel a shared sense of identity, history, or destiny with gentile nationals in the US, Canada, Poland, France, UK, Germany, Brazil, and etc. To Jewish minorities(elites or otherwise) in such nations, most of the people are just seen as replaceable and interchangeable filthy goy untermensch. To sustain Jewish supremacism, Jews suppress goy nationalism. Consider how David Brooks and William Kristol are obsessed with keeping Israel as a Jewish ethno-state BUT they’d love to see whites in Europe, US, and Canada reduced to minorities in their lands of their ancestors. And hideous Jewish supremacists like Max Boot and Jennifer Rubin think gentiles exist as cannon fodders in the endless Wars for Israel. To Jews, goyim are little more than cattle. Jews look upon gentiles like ruling pigs look upon other barn creatures in George Orwell’s ANIMAL FARM.
Jews now practice Imperialist Nationalism of ‘Nationalism for me but not for thee’. So, Jews say all Western nations must support Israel as a JEWISH STATE but also insist that white gentile nations must abandon nationalism(even one that says ‘for me and for thee’) because gentiles exist to serve Jewish power first and foremost. Jews don’t want gentile nationalism to come between Jewish Supremacism and White Submissivism. Also, Jews push for Mass Invasion(aka ‘immigration’) to turn the native white majority populations into minorities in their own nations. That way, Jews can control the native majority by guilt-baiting them with accusations of ‘racism’ for being insufficiently ‘welcoming’ of non-white mass invaders and leeches. And as the nation grows ever more diverse, Jewish Imperial elites hope to play divide-and-rule by pitting nonwhites against whites, whites against nonwhites, nonwhites against nonwhites(as they are racially diverse), and whites against whites(as they’re ideologically divided).
This is why Jews fear being ‘gandhi-ed’ out of the West. Indeed, what would happen if white folks woke up and told the Jewish supremacist-imperialists, “It’s time you left”? What if whites decided on mass civil disobedience against Jewish Power? Say NO to the Wars for Zion. Goycott Jewish Hollywood, Goycott Jewish media, Goycott Jewish-run businesses that are hostile to whites, Goycott Jewish Casinos. No to Zion. Time to tear down the Zion Curtain. That would surely make the Jews sweat. As the Hindus(against Brits), blacks(against Segregation), and National Socialists(against Jews) proved, boycotting businesses can be very effective. Palestinians are leading the way with BDS. Of course, Jews use Economic Warfare all the time. Consider how Jews use the West to sanction Iran and Russia. Consider how MAGA types have been debanked and deplatformed and hit with endless lawfare. Donald Trump is being stripped of all his wealth. (Of course, the sad sack of shit is still bending over to take it up his arse from the Zionic dong.)
As it stands, Jewish imperialism is far more insidious and dangerous than British imperialism. At the very least, British Imperialism, like the French or Spanish kind, was OUT IN THE OPEN. It wasn’t denied. If anything, the British made a splashy pageant of it 24/7. Brits were singing anthems about how Britain rules one third of the globe. So, there was NO DOUBT as to the nature of the British Empire.
In contrast, Judea is a Hidden Empire. Even though the biggest power in the world is the Jewish Global Network — most US politicians, academics, media people, and etc. are agents or shills of Zion — , Jewish power uses goy countries as fronts to carry out its vile deeds. So, even though the Power of Zion was behind the war on Syria, Westerners have been led to believe the US and EU are only trying to get rid of Assad as the ‘butcher of Syria’ and gasser-of-children. Jewish supremacists are craven but cunning arseholes who use their vast capital to manipulate, bribe, and threaten OTHERS to do the fighting and dying.
It was very different in the Age of the British Empire. Everyone knew the British were in command of using their proxies and subjects to further British Imperial interest. So, even when Brits recruited and ordered Indian, African, and Arab troops to fight in wars, no one would have thought India, Kenya, or Arabia were leading the charge. Everyone would have known that those non-white forces were doing the bidding of the British. But, because the Empire of Judea is a Hidden Empire, so many people fall for the charade that ‘liberal democratic’ Western nations have freely chosen to wage these Wars for Human Rights, which are really the Wars for the Hidden Empire of Zion. The UK and France are essentially vassal nations of the US that is a vassal whore of the Empire of Judea.
The problem with MAGA was never nationalism. If the US had chosen the nationalist path — what Pat Buchanan called ‘republic, not an empire’ — after the end of the Cold War, the world would be a safer and better place. Just think. Suddenly, the Soviet Union was gone, and Russia was no longer a threat and sought political and economic cooperation with the world. If Anglo-Americans or WASPs had kept the power, maybe something could have been worked out. But Jews were rapidly gaining elite dominance in the US in the 80s and 90s. And Jewish attitude toward Russians was hardly different from their attitude toward white Americans: Both are mere cattle, replaceable and interchangeable. To Judeo-Nazis, white Russians and white Americans are filthy goyim, or untermensch, more akin to dogs, horses, cattle.
So, the hope of Russia’s transition from communism to a market economy was wasted. Jewish globalists held the reins of ‘reform’ in Russia and economically plundered the nation in the 1990s. Also, Billy Boy Clinton, a shill of Jewish globalists, pushed NATO right up to Russia’s borders. Jews figured, “Don’t let a crisis go to waste.” Jews exploited the End of the Cold War for their own nefarious interests. Instead of having the US empire retreat with the fall of the Soviet empire, Jews took advantage of America-as-sole-superpower to consolidate control over the EU and Russia. Thus, European nations soon became mere vassal-states in a few generations. Also, clever Jews manipulated the vanity of warriors like John McCain and ‘thinkers’ like Samantha Powers into believing that they, as redemptive gentile leaders of the ‘exceptional’ and ‘indispensable’ nation, were entitled to the right of Enlightened Empire Building to remake the whole world in their image.
Of course, Jewish directed the power of the US mostly toward Jewish-Supremacist agendas, which is why most of US aggression has been directed at the Middle East, North Africa, and Ukraine(or Pale of Settlement). Consider how Jewish power directed the US to use sanctions, invasions, and even the support for Jihadi terrorists to undermine stability in the Middle East, all for the supremacist interests of Israeli hegemony. Jews, in their perversity, even went so far as to strike up an alliance with sub-Nazi forces in Ukraine as battering ram against Russia.
Donald Trump in 2016 ran on nationalism that promised to end or severely limit American ventures overseas. Prior to his administration, the US had already been the imperialist wrecker of Iraq, Libya, Syria(where CIA aided Al Qaeda, the very people who were accused of carrying out 9/11), and the recruiter of Neo-Nazi elements to pull off a coup in Ukraine. Trump sounded good during the campaign, but the Deep State circled him like sharks and forced his hand to do the bidding of the Empire of Judea instead of focusing on the problems at home, like the broken southern border.
Globalist ‘humanitarians’ say the rich and powerful US shouldn’t be so self-absorbed and instead help other nations. But their idea of ‘humanitarian’ intervention mostly comes down to destroying nations hated by Jews. And the bulk of US foreign aid is more money for Israel to keep on crushing Palestinians and destabilizing the Middle East with threats and attacks.
Jews hate the idea of American nationalism because it means the goy sheeple of the US will no longer go baaaaah and support Wars for Zion. Also, the theme of American Nationalism would be, “American leaders must do what is good for MOST Americans(most of whom are not Jewish).” Jews hate the notion because Jews feel zero affinity with goy Americans. Jews want the bulk of American resources and energy to be channeled toward sustaining the globalist hegemony of Jewish Power. The mentality of Jews isn’t much different from that of an absolute monarch. The king expects the people to serve him, not vice versa. The Jewish 2% expects the gentile 98% to serve them, not vice versa.
The world needs universal nationalism more than ever. Nationalism for Me and for Thee. But as long as Jewish power rules the West, it remains difficult. Jews fear gentile nationalism because it undermines the neo-imperial globalist Jewish hegemony of the US.
To better understand the Jewish mindset as a microcosm, consider the Israel-Palestine conflict. How nice it’d be if Jews went for ‘Nationalism for Me and for Thee’ with their Palestinian neighbors. Jews would have Israel as their homeland, and Palestinians would have the West Bank as their homeland. But nope, Jewish power summons the support of the West to crush Palestinian nationalism while maximizing their own nationalism with massive walls and military violence. It is a form of Imperialist Nationalism: ‘Nationalism for Me but not for Thee.’ So unjust.
‘Nationalism for Me but not for Thee’ is like the logic of American Slavery, which was ‘Freedom for Me but not for Thee.’ Abolitionists began to ask, if white folks should be free, why not blacks too? Likewise, if Israel has the right to be free and independent as a Jewish state, why doesn’t Hungary have the right to be free and independent as a Hungarian nation? Sorosian Jews call upon the West to praise and support Zionist nationalism but then pressure the EU to sanction and destroy Hungary for having chosen national survival and self-determination.
We know why things are so. Because Jews seek to maximize their own tribal power, they seek to weaken the ethno-national power of all other peoples who will then be coerced to serve Jewish globalist hegemony.
Anyway, how depressing that Trump, who ran on nationalism and an end to globo-imperialism of US interventionism, was pressured by the Deep State Zionists and Military Industrial Complex to continue with the same old same old, which is sucking up to Jewish Supremacists. The US continues to occupy much of desperate Syria. The US accuses Russia of meddling in Western affairs — who can forget the Russia Collusion Hoax? — and harboring aggressive global ambitions when, in fact, the Jewish-controlled US is the #1 meddler in other national elections and the invader & destroyer of Iraq & Libya and an enabler of terrorists in Syria and Ukraine. When will this madness ever end?
The US is like India under the British. Sikh Indians joined in all the British Wars. When the British fought in Africa, Middle East, WWI, and WWII, Indian soldiers served under ‘queen and country’ that wasn’t their own. Indians had no agency. The US is under Jewish imperialism & cuck to Jewish wars. A jewel in the crown for the Jews. White Americans are now the Sikh Men of the West.
Anyway, the overall arc of history is as follows.
1. Imperialism. The mighty dominate and rule over all others. Might is right.
2. National Imperialism. The right of one’s own nation to be safe and secure from invasions but no such rights granted to other peoples. Example: Japan defended itself from other empires but advanced into China. ‘Nationalism for me but not for thee.’
3. Universal Nationalism. The right of each nation/people/culture to be free and independent. Nationalism for all peoples of the world as the core basis for international cooperation. It is the Template that emerged from the ashes of WWII and the end of European and Japanese empires. ‘Nationalism for me and for thee’.
4. Universal Imperialism. The right of great powers to militarily, financially, and culturally invade and transform other nations: Drop bombs, take over banks, bribe politicians, and spread Homomania as the new crusading faith. In turn, the great powers must welcome vast demographic invasions by the rest of the world. ‘Imperialism for me and for thee.’ It’s great for Jews who control Western banks and whore politicians of the US & EU and who seek to use increased Diversity in the West to play divide-and-rule among goyim. We see this dynamic playing out between the EU and the Middle East. The EU supports the Zionist-US invasions of the Middle East and then welcomes millions of Muslim ‘refugees’ displaced by those invasions. The EU becomes demographically invaded in turn.
Boomer cucks did immeasurable harm to the US, the West, and whites by cucking to Jews and Israel and ceding all power and moral authority to the Jews. Had white boomers been more adversarial and pushed back against Jewish Supremacism, the Jewish supremacist cancer wouldn’t have spread so fast and far. Sadly, instead of atoning for their epic error in judgment, the boomer cucks are doubling down on their cuckage to Israel in the latest bloodbath in the Holy Land.
How things might change if white people took inspiration from the Palestinians. Palestinians are weak and small in number but full of fight and courage. Whites are big and powerful in number but filled with craven brown-nosing cuckery. If Palestinian Defiance were combined with White Potential, Jews would be finished. Palestinians cannot beat the Jews. But, whites with the Palestinian spirit could beat the Jews. If whites grew defiant and stood up to Jews and finally realized that Zion is their enemy, Jews would lose white support, and then Jewish Power would be over. Jewish Power must feed on white submission and support. If whites were to wake up and say NO MORE to Jewish Wars in Ukraine and Middle East, Jewish terror and tyranny would fade from the world that could enter a new golden age. Palestinians are weak politically and militarily but they do have something priceless: truth and courage. They know Jews are their enemy and have the guts to fight even after Jews pound them again and again. Whites are potentially the most powerful people on Earth but have fallen in grace in the US and EU because they cravenly cuck to Jews, their main tormentors. Just imagine the promise of Palestinian Guts + White Potential? If whites thought and acted like Palestinians, Jewish Power would be kaput sooner than later. What have whites gained by sucking up to Jews? Whites may have thought Jews would be nice to them if whites aided and abetted the Jewish destruction of Palestine. But what happened? Whites only fed the beast of Jewish greed, supremacism, and hubris, and Jews are now looking to push WHITE NAKBA to diversify the West itself so that goyim can be divided-and-ruled. White Cucking to Jews since WWII has been the biggest tragedy of Western Civilization. Learn from the Palestinians. White Intifada against White Nakba.
Do cockfighters care about the cocks? No, they only care about the game, the betting and winning. They don’t care about dead cocks because that’s what cockfighting is about, training male chickens to fight to kill or die. If your cock dies, you don’t grieve and think it’s the end of the world. It’s a game where you your cock will eventually fall to a tougher one. Then, you get some more cocks and re-enter the game. Cocks do all the killing and dying. Even the ones that win only get some food and water, but then their view of life is limited to chickendom. Being dumb animals, they have no concept of life but to follow their instincts, which is easily manipulated by humans who know that cocks will naturally fight if pitted against one another. It’s the cockfighter who wins the money while cocks either die or get hurt, as even the winning cock suffers some injuries. But then, are young soldiers all that different? They are willing to kill people they don’t know or lose their limbs and even die in wars just for cheapie medals on their chest and flag-waving paeans to serving-one’s-country, even if it means engaging in overseas wars far away that have nothing to do with national interests but only serve the global agenda of Jewish supremacist tribalists.
If goy cucks are sapheads who sheepishly serve at the feet of Jewish Supremacist power, goy cocks are full of fight but aren’t too bright. They love posturing tough with guns & grenades and copters & missiles but can’t see beyond the rah-rah Rambo-like mentality of ‘serving your country’ and ‘kicking ass’ in the name of ‘beer and country’. They don’t ask, at least not to any meaningful degree, “Who really controls my country?” and “Are the elites serving essential national interests or some nefarious agenda of a dark cabal?” They certainly have physical courage in fields strewn with bullets and bombs, but they are feeble upstairs. (On the other hand, some of the stupidest and most brain-twisted idiots are the ‘highly-educated’ and ‘well-read’, not because they’re low-IQ but because, in their deference to elitism and conceit on status, uncritically trust and absorb the prejudices packaged as ‘perspectives’ from dominant institutions controlled by Jewish supremacists, globalist-imperialists, and the military-industrial-complex. But, who are they to question the narratives when they’re tied up with the sanctimony of ‘Western Democratic’ Globohomo, Negrolatry, and endless incantations of diversity-equity-inclusion? Elite white-bread are white-read, or well-read in accordance to the Sorosian agenda.)
One might even say the cocks, for all their physical courage, are mental cowards because they, like the samurai in feudal times, mindlessly obey all directives from above. Their hierarchical ‘conservative’ mentality predisposes them to serve authority, respect superiors, and follow orders. So, even if the political order is decadent or degenerate(and denigrate genuine conservative and traditional values), your average conzo soldier is bound to say ‘yes sir’ because his simpleminded honor is about taking orders and carrying out one’s duties without question in TOP GUN fashion. In other words, they aren’t all that different from critters in dog-fighting or cockfighting. Fighting Cocks are fierce but are still chicken, and whites are total chickens, or ‘whickens’, before Jewish Power.
Of course, all soldiers the world over follow orders. If every soldier defied his superiors and raised endless questions, no military could function. Precisely because the military(and indeed the state in general) in any system is about the people more or less going along with the agenda from above, it is of crucial importance that the leaders are responsible men rooted in sound view of reality and motivated by genuine national interests. When the US was preparing for the Iraq War, surely many in government(and even the military) were skeptical about the plan, but they went along and did their part because it was their job to do so. As the saying goes, fish rots from the head. Even good men end up serving evil when the top is infested with rot.
The US and the ‘Collective West’(as extension of US hegemony) aren’t led by sound people and motivated by national interests(or even by genuine universalist principles, misguided and naively optimistic as they may be). In the so-called West, only Israel operates on the basis of genuine national interests, though the ultra-nationalism inherent in Zionism has been pathologized into neo-imperialist Yinonism(or the ideology of the Yinon Plan).
Arguably, Hungary and Poland, halfway part of the ‘Collective West’, are still in nationalist mode. Unlike Israel, Hungary practices genuine nationalism that respects other nations on the basis of mutual recognition and reciprocity. Still, Hungary’s situation is precarious because the EU and NATO, as puppets of the Jewish-run US, have their knives out for Orban’s vision of Hungary, even as they profusely praise and fund Israel(despite Jews being the richest people in the world). As for Poland(the land of self-loathing Slavic suck-ups), if it must choose between nationalism and approval from globalist superpower, it leans toward the latter. In the current Ukrainian crisis, Poland has been in lockstep with the Jewish-run US and went so far as to stab Hungary in the back even though it knew with absolute clarity of the ‘Western’ provocations that led to the Russian invasion. Unlike Hungarians who are content to be left alone and leave others alone, Poles suffer from a massive inferiority-superiority complex as they’d once been a central power in Europe but lost it all and found themselves at the mercy of bigger powers. It’s a chicken in hawk’s clothing. Given that Poland’s tragedies were often the result of being caught between two or more great powers, one would think it would opt for neutrality in any conflict, but it has thrown its lot fully with the US that is controlled by Jews who despise Dumb Polacks, but they clever and savvy Jews know how to manipulate Polish national neurosis: “You Poles are Western Slavs, more advanced and sophisticated, not like those boorish hot-blooded Russian Slavs who only know vodka and dancing with bears.” Perhaps, Poles hope that the West will be more tolerant of Poland’s nationalism if Poland serves the globalist project in Ukraine. Or, it could be Poland’s revanchist feelings about Russia.
Another factor is every nation/people want to seem tough by having some Other to hate on. Given the power dynamics, the reviled Other usually isn’t the dominant threat or existing tyranny but the approved scapegoat or punching bag. In George Orwell’s 1984, the people are oppressed by ‘Big Brother’ and would gain much to speak out against ‘him’, but no one dares to because ‘Big Brother’ power can crush them like ants. They are cowards under ‘Big Brother’, but people have a psychological need to feel tough and courageous. So, the system directs their rage at ‘Goldstein’ as a therapeutic outlet(as well as for ideological unity).
If peoples in the Collective West were truly tough and honest, they would be denouncing the US above all as the main instigator of wars and gangsterism around the world. Furthermore, they would point to Jewish Supremacists as the demented authors of ‘Western’ policy. But, most Americans are beholden to and/or afraid of Jewish Power. As craven cowards at the feet of Zion, they seek toughness points by saber-rattling at China over Taiwan(or Uighurs) or sticking their chests out at hot-blooded Russia-Russia-Russia. The likes of Mitt Romney and Lindsey Graham, so castrated and obsequious at the feet of Jews, bark like mad dogs at Big Bad Russia and Evil Putin(as ‘Goldstein’). They’re silent about Jewish use of Antifa and BLM to terrorize American cities and the Jewish use of Biden’s administration to effectively destroy US borders, but they howl about the sanctity of Ukraine, which is really Jewish Gangster Paradise, what Cuba was once to the Jewish mafia and the CIA before the Castroite Revolution. Romney might as well be Senator Geary in THE GODFATHER PART 2.
And of course, there are weaklings who frown upon Russia’s actions because they’re so eager to show that they themselves are not ‘violent’ and ‘aggressive’, as the Jews and the so-called ‘left’ have often depicted ‘white supremacists’, ‘white nationalists’, ‘racists’, and MAGA crowd to be. Having internalized the Jewish accusation that the White Right is all about militancy, the weaklings are so eager to prove otherwise and get triggered by any sight of a white majority country finally pushing back against the Jewish Agenda. The weaklings fear that Russia’s actions have proven Jewish accusations correct, i.e. ‘white nationalism’, of which Russian Nationalism is supposedly a part, is potentially aggressive and warlike, and therefore must be suppressed lest it explode into violence like Russia in Ukraine. Don’t these weaklings know that, when push comes to shove, it’s only force that decides the outcome when all else fails?
Eucks(EU cucks) are hardly different from the whucks(white cucks) in the US. With Holocaustianity and other Jewish-enforced cults(such as Negrolatry and Globo-Homo) as their new sanctities, their leaders and brainwashed masses dare not name the Real Threat to national defense and preservation. NATO is useless because Russia poses no threat to Europe(unless it is provoked, which Jews have been doing since the end of the Soviet Union). If anything, membership in NATO and EU is a far bigger threat because it keeps European nations under the wing of the Jewish-controlled US, the grand plan for the EU being endless immigration from the Third World(especially black Africa), globo-homo degeneracy, craven cuckery to Jewish gangsterism, Negrolatry & Jungle Fever, and cutting economic ties to Russia with essential raw materials of great benefit to Europe. If Europeans had some integrity and courage, they would bury the hatchet with Russia while rejecting Jewish supremacist hegemonism, which is what US power has essentially devolved into, but then the current ‘democratic’ order is about the Rule of Money, and super-rich Jews can easily buy off the white-whore-elites to do their bidding, much like Jews financed BLM to be anti-white but never anti-Zionist. White whores and black whores, they both take the money and don’t care as long as they got theirs — it seems David Mamet was right about most goyim, i.e. for all their posturing as ‘patriots’, ‘liberals’, ‘conservatives’, or ideologues of various stripes, there’s an offer they can’t refuse in the form of bribery or blackmail.
Militarily, financially, culturally, and ‘spiritually’, the Brits and Continentals have become so subordinate to Jewish-run US power that they dare not see and state the obvious, i.e. Jewish Supremacism is the biggest threat to their well-being and ethnic survival. But, it sure doesn’t feel good to own up to one’s cravenness. Just like a dog cowering before a big dog nearby regains a bit of self-esteem by barking at a dog far away, the EU dog that rolls over for the big US dog(that, in turn, rolls before the Jewish Master) barks at the Big Bad Russian Bear, not because the EU is within the reach of Russia’s claws but safely distanced from them. In a spectacular case of misdirection, membership in NATO sustains the illusion that EU cuck-nation-states are still tough and firmly resolved against ‘existential’ threats. What an irony of history. Eastern European states were once under Soviet tyranny but maintained the myth of unity against the non-existent Western military threat, which became a reality for Russia only after the Cold War when Jews took over as the new US elites and absorbed former Warsaw Pact nations into an alliance against Russia as the all-purpose bogeyman(when EU is really being destroyed by Jewish-spearheaded agendas like the Great Replacement, Diversity-mongering, Eternal Holocaust Guilt, and neo-Weimarization).
EU is really fearful of Jewish Power and the US, not Russia, but, worse, the fear is loaded with worship of Jews as the neo-jesuses of Holocaustianity. When Anglos ruled the US, Europeans might fear American power but could mouth anti-American slogans because they didn’t worship Anglo-Americans, and similarly, for all their fear of the Soviet Union, Eastern Europeans during the Cold War didn’t behold Russians as a special or holy people; in contrast, Jews have become objects of near-worship on both sides of the Atlantic. A German or Italian during the Cold War could badmouth ‘yankees’ to loud cheers, and Poles and Hungarians under the Iron Curtain could make derogatory remarks about Russians to the delight of fellow countrymen, but no one dares to say anything even mildly critical of the holy-schmoly Jews, especially a dangerous state of affairs as Jewish supremacists control the US as the lone superpower and are hellbent in making goyim kill goyim for their tribal self-aggrandizement.
EU takes a tough-seeming stance toward Russia because of zero consequences. If anything, there are treats and prizes to be had for good doggy behavior before the Jewish master, and it’s worth noting that psychology, than mere material rewards, factors into all this because status-anxious elites don’t live on bread alone but a sense of virtue that has been made synonymous with appeasement of and approval from Jews, so much so that Western goy elites will sacrifice a good deal of material advantages for emotional capital accrued from the Jewish hand petting their good-doggy heads. (However, the recent crises are making some Europeans think twice as to whether Russian power and influence are really so inconsequential while Jewish-controlled US power is so absolute and invincible. Still, what is good for the nation is secondary to the collaborationist elites whose main priority is position and privilege in the status quo, much like the communist elites of Warsaw Pact nation served the Soviet Union to the very end for their own narrow interests.) Likewise, Japan is a bitch-whore of the US but dares not speak up against it. Instead, it huffs-n-puffs itself up by flicking the middle finger at China and Russia, or getting into tiffs with that other bitch-whore South Korea, while neither dares to stand against in any substantive way against Jewish-controlled US influence that spreads the same civilization-destroying rot in all the goy world — yet, the sheer chutzpah of the likes of George Soros saying Russian victory will mean the ‘end of civilization’, because the foundations of civilization are apparently tranny-mania, slut pride, jungle fever, anti-white vitriol, and the Great Replacement; it’s like a quack warning someone of lung cancer upon quitting smoking. Of course, if the EU and Japan were under Russian control, they’d roll over for the Kremlin while making nasty noises about the West, which was indeed the case with the Warsaw Pact nations.
Anyway, the reason why Jews call for ‘World War III’ is because they see themselves as the cockfighters using goyim as cocks to tear one another apart. If there ever was a chance that a large number of Jews would become embroiled directly in the conflagration, Jews would not be for ‘World War III’. No cockfighter wants to be a cock himself and be pecked into bloody oblivion by other cocks. But what does he care as long as he gets to play god over the cocks? The blood sport is entertaining and profitable for all involved. Even in the Middle East where Israel is located, notice Jews involve the US, and most of the soldiers doing the killing and dying are the goyim. The IDF exists to defend Israel or to crush easy opponents. All the heavy-lifting and dying are left to the US and NATO coalition of goy cucks. Jews are the master, American goyim are the alpha dog, and rest of NATO is beta dog or below.
Now, what is meant by ‘World War III’? It’s mostly hyperbole and has little chance of becoming reality, a worthy sequel to WWII. One thing for sure, it will NOT escalate into a nuclear exchange as that will certainly affect Jews as well. The last thing Jews want is for New York and Los Angeles to be reduced to ashes. By ‘WWIII’, it means the US and NATO expanding and prolonging the conflict WITHIN Ukraine. Sure, US soldiers and European NATO soldiers may die if things escalate, along with a good number of Russians(and many more Ukrainians), but Jews don’t care. The cocks in the bloody pit will be goyim. It will be the goyim, and Jews don’t care about dead Russians, Ukrainians, Germans, Poles, Czechs, French, and, yes, Anglos.
It’s been said Jews hate Russia, but it has less to do with Russian-ness per se than its relative sovereignty and independence. When Russia came under Bolshevik authority(substantially Jewish in the first phase), many Jews around the world were friendly toward Russia. Many Jews in the US spied for the Soviet Union, even sending atomic secrets. Harry Dexter White was mindful of ‘Russian’ interests in mind back then, a time when your average Jew felt more hatred and resentment toward Anglos who seemed to patch up things with the Germans following WWII. But now that Anglos have totally cucked to Jews, they are treated as good doggies, whereas the Russians, with their autonomous sense of historical narrative and national interests, are intolerable to Jewish supremacism.
The Trump phenomenon offered a glimpse as to the character of the Jewish political psychology. It feels the most hatred for goyim + independence, just like a pimp cannot accept a hooker going her own way. Why do Jews hate Iran more than Saudi Arabia? Both nations are steeped in religion and tradition. Because Iran has been far more sovereign, defiant of what-Jews-want, whereas Saudis have long been the lackeys of the US. But of late, even Saudi Arabia may come under the crosshairs because it is finally showing signs of defiance to the US world order. The Syrian and Ukrainian conflicts have amply illustrated that Jews can be less hostile toward even the most extremist groups, such as ISIS terrorists and Ukro-Sub-Nazis, IF their actions complement the Jewish Grand Plan, aka “Is it good for Jews?”, the only calculus of value to Jewish Supremacism. Almost certainly, Zionists manipulated and guided Alqaeda elements to carry out the 9/11 attacks, and then, in the name of fighting Alqaeda, directed US military power against the Taliban to control of Afghanistan and against Hussein to conquer Iraq. Alqaeda was the main excuse but not the main target of US wars, and if anything, the ‘West’ under Obama & Hillary, tools of Jewish Supremacists, reanimated it to destroy Libya and Syria(but most of the Jewish-controlled MSM looks the other way in the Empire of Jewish Lies and Goy suckers & cowards).
Trump populism energized many white Americans to rally for their own racial and class interests. How did Jews react to all this? With utter shock and horror. Not because these MAGA ‘deplorables’ are really Neo-Nazis but simply because they represent WGTOW or Whites-Going-Their-Own-Way, rather like Russia away from Jewish-led homo-globalism. It drove Jews crazy to hear white cocks singing, “We ain’t gonna work on Maggie’s Farm no more”. How would a cockfighter feel if the cocks decided to stop fighting for his benefit?
Jews hated MAGA as much as they hated Russia and, if anything, conflated the two as one phenomenon(along with Brexit, which eventually proved as hollow as Trumpism). Jewish Power, which cares not one iota for traditional America and autonomous US national interests, portrayed Trump and MAGA as traitors against ‘America’, with cucks like Mitt Romney nodding along — apparently, border security is akin to Nazism while Antifa street terror is the moral equivalent of US soldiers landing on Normandy. So, what exactly is this ‘America’ that we should be loyal to? A colony of Jewish Supremacism, the highest values of which are Negrolatry of thugs, Globo-Homo celebration, Tranny-Wanny monstrosity, completely broken borders, debasement of elections, total ethnic domination of finance-academia-media, and endless pieties about the Holocaust when, in truth, Jewish Supremacism is like the New Nazi power around the world, even openly aligned with Nazi-variants in Ukraine.
Now, what do Putin’s Russia and MAGAmerica have in common? The former is explicitly about national sovereignty and the latter implicitly so, which may translate over time into potential defiance of whatever-Jews-want. Jews want all goyim to be like Mitt Romney, Lindsey Graham, Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton, Rich Lowry, David French, and the like. Even supporting Israel isn’t enough IF one’s position hints at the restoration of national sovereignty for one’s own people. Russia has had good working relations with Israel but is still reviled by World Jewry. Trump took it up the arse, dong and fist, from Netanyahu, but Jews still hated him for stoking nationalism in the US(and for urging European nations to follow suit and chart their own destinies independent of NATO). Hungary is pro-Israel but in the Jewish crosshairs for subversion and regime change. Why? Jews demand, want, and expect everything to go their way; they see the entire world as a chess game of ‘Zionists’ and ‘Palestinians’, or ‘Jews win, goyim lose’. They have the mono-god-complex, i.e. their power is the only true power while all other powers are false powers. Jews exist to rule as the god-race, and goyim must first and foremost serve Jews or be crushed and humiliated like the Palestinians.
Whites need to understand that nationalism is best served by pan-race-ism(or pan-ethnicism). (Race-ism defined as, “Ism means belief, and race + ism means belief in the reality of race and racial differences, hence the need for racial consciousness.”) Pan-race-ism allows for a better understanding and mutual respect among peoples of the same race(or related ethnicities). Based upon such racial mutuality, they can respect their differences, what makes each group unique, as well as their similarities. Before the EU degenerated into the farce it is today, with the creation of ‘Afrope’(Africa-as-penis fused with Europe-as-vagina) as its ultimate plan, it was a pan-race-ist enterprise that acknowledged that all Europeans were of the same race(with minor differences) and shared histories & cultures(with variations of course). So, instead of Europeans slaughtering one another in more wars, why not learn to live together on the basis of mutual respect as the peoples of the same race on the same continent? The project wasn’t to dissolve European nations but to unite them in constructive and meaningful ways, and mutual race-ism was the strongest glue in all this. After all, Spain is closer to North Africa than to Sweden, but Latins and Germanics have long been regarded as fellow Europeans of the white race.
And Asia also has much to gain from a pan-race-ism where all would acknowledge a certain common bond based on blood and culture. Acknowledge national sovereignties and ethnic differences but also work in the knowledge of shared Asian-ness. And there are organizations for black pan-African mutuality and understanding, and again, race plays a major role.
Indeed, the Jewish Advantage owes to pan-race-ism. Over many centuries, Jews spread out all over the world and mixed and assimilated with various peoples, and Jews in different lands spoke different languages and became ‘Polish Jews’, ‘Russian Jews’, ‘German Jews’, ‘French Jews’, ‘Hungarian Jews’, ‘Greek Jews’, ‘Persian Jews’, ‘Yemenese Jews’, ‘Mexican Jews’, ‘Argentinian Jews’, ‘American Jews’, and etc. Despite these differences, there was enough of a Pan-Jewishism that prevented excessive animus among the various tribes and, moreover, facilitated their global networking, culminating in their global power today. And it is this pan-Jewish internationalism that provides crucial support for Zionism and Jewish nationalism in Israel, which goes to show that nationalism in concert with world power has far more leeway and leverage than a nationalism that is isolated and without global networks. Jews all over the world cooperate in supporting Jewishness and Jewish Power.
Now, imagine the kind of power white people would have around the world IF their various nationalisms were interconnected via pan-white race-ism. So, instead of seeing the world in terms of ethno-nationalism vs white race-ism, the best way forward is to secure the various ethno-nationalisms on the white-race-ist foundation of shared blood and common threads. Pan-Race-ism is an essential bedrock for ethno-nationalism. In the end, Nazism failed because it rejected Pan-Race-ism in favor of Teutonic supremacism. Instead of respecting Slavs as part of the European folks/race, it went into Neo-Spartanist mode of Master Folks ruling over Helot Folks.
Despite Cold War tensions, the two decades from the end of World War II to around mid-60s were the golden age of Pan-Race-ist Nationalism in the West. Not only did the Cold War remain cold(or peaceful) but both camps, capitalist Western Europe(and US & Canada) and communist Eastern Europe, recognized in theory and considerable practice the sovereignty and inviolability of the nation-state. The US was militarily dominant in Western Europe, but the uniqueness and independence of each nation were respected. And even though Soviets dominated, militarily and politically, most of Eastern Europe, they respected the national integrity of the communist member states, i.e. Poland as the land of Poles, Hungary the land of Hungarians, Czechoslovakia for the Czechs & Slovaks, and etc. Besides, the communists were too occupied trying to keep people in to ever worry about hordes of non-European foreigners. It was a time of ever increasing individuality and liberty, more prosperity and opportunity. And the West, having shed most of its overseas empires, was finally cleansed of the moral burden that comes with ruling over foreigners.
Even though overt ‘racism’ of the supremacist kind was increasingly out of fashion, there was nothing wrong with European identity and pride. And it was wonderful to be white in America. And Jews hadn’t yet gained dominant power, and Holocaustianity as the new official cult of the West hadn’t yet taken hold. After the hellish tragedies of World War I and World War II and despite Cold War tensions, it seemed as if the white race had finally arrived at a pan-race-ist culture of mutual respect.
Also, the remapping of Europe after World War II along more homogenous lines and the abandonment of the imperial project meant less cause for contention — and all Europeans shared the same tragic sense of defeat, either under Axis or Allied power. A fuller appreciation of the new status quo would have been great for the future of the West. But several developments happened. The Black time bomb finally went off in the US, and race problems became ever more toxic there. Then, whites lost their minds in the US & Canada and went for open borders. The gates of near-paradisiacal domains flung open to the Third World. Meanwhile, the insipid and radical strains of post-war ideology infected the younger generation that exploded in the insane ‘revolutions’ of 1968 that, for example, tore France apart for no good reason at all. And black factor in pop culture spread Jungle Fever and cuckery.
Unfortunately, in the absence of pan-white-race-ism, there is no resistance and counterweight to pan-Jewish tribalism that stretches across continents. Whether Jews are ‘right-wing’ or ‘left-wing’, they have a wink-wink understanding with fellow Jews. So, even as ‘rightist’ Jews attack the ‘left’ and ‘globalism’, they will not name the Jewish Power and, if anything, viciously attack anyone who does. Likewise, even as ‘leftist’ or ‘liberal’ Jews denounce the ‘far right’, ‘supremacism’, and ‘extremism’, they(like the New York Times) are careful to tip-toe around the fact of Jewish ultra-rightism and ultra-nationalism emanating from Zion and Jewish cooperation with ultra-radical ISIS Jihadis(and remnants and mutations of Alqaeda) and Sub-Nazi cults & battalions in Ukraine.
In contrast, but for a smallish segment of race-realist or race-conscious whites scattered across the West, most whites not only lack a sense of pan-white-race-ism but are downright hostile to any notion of whiteness except as something to blame, shame, and defame. Even whites who oppose ‘white guilt’ try to justify their racial identity by associating it with friendly feelings toward blacks(despite black violence against whites) and reverence of Jews(despite Jews pulling the strings of the anti-white agenda); it is why the likes of Douglas Murray are totally worthless. “I’m not ashamed to be white because I’m so totally and absolutely against ‘racism’ and uphold ‘Western’ standards of excellence and meritocracy that welcome any number of nonwhites to Britain as long as they play by the rules.” What a homo-cuck.
Thus, lacking a deep sense of racial roots, whites have fragmented along ideological or idolatrous lines. Many blacks may be ill-educated and averse to books, but they need not think too hard since the mere fact of being black justifies their existence — X Kendi’s schtick is, “I BE black, so gimme more”, which complements the mindset of Jews who, though intellectual and very well-read, also enjoy justification-by-mere-being, i.e. they are holy merely for being Jewish. Jews are great for being Jewish, blacks are great for being black, but whites are ‘guilty’ for being white; then, no wonder whites seek redemption by rituals of BELIEVING, and the sacraments(such as support Zion over Palestine and turn a blind eye to or morally justify black violence) are, of course, decided by Jews(and blacks & homos) as whites are denied autonomy and agency. Absence of agency can lead to two conclusions: (1) no matter what wrongs you commit, it’s never your fault because you’re at the mercy of ‘systemic racism’ or something or other, always a helpless victim (2) no matter what good you do, it’s always your fault because the system perpetuates supremacism in your favor, therefore even your goodness is just an extension of that ‘privilege’.
One thing that would be beneficial to whites is to use ‘race-ism’ and ‘race-ist’ in positive contexts. ‘Racism’ is usually invoked in cases of school shootings, Fed-sponsored KKK antics, Nazi wars of annihilation(though most of the victims were whites), vandalism, ‘hate crimes’, and etc., but it should be associated with all the great things as well. To the extent that there was a racial factor to Western achievements, the various fields of arts, science, philosophy, spirituality, and etc. should be admired through the prism of race-ism. Besides, why not when the ‘wokesters’ are now saying Math is ‘racist’, Classical Music is ‘racist’, Shakespeare’s works are ‘racist’, Western science is ‘racist’, Western medicine is ‘racist’, and etc? Alright, alright, we agree. All such good things are ‘race-ist’. And ending slavery was race-ist too because whites did it on grounds that they, as the most advanced race, had the moral obligation to end the practice all over the world. There was an element of racial pride in such moral crusades. The Great Race-ist Crusade to End Slavery among the non-white feudalists, barbarians, and savages.
Ideologically, there is the split between ‘conservatives’ and ‘liberals’, both sides accusing the other side of being ‘racist’ or ‘the real racists’. Or, many whites have staked their claim to ‘virtue’ and/or ‘spiritual’ uplift on account of their idols. So-called ‘liberal’ and ‘leftist’ whites think they are oh-so-wonderfully redemptive because they can’t conceive of anything holier than George Floyd and some tranny with his dick cut off. And so-called ‘conservatives’, despite being bashed and insulted by Jews 24/7, think they are so very wonderful because they stand with Israel. In either case, whites try to justify themselves by association with some Other. Do blacks justify their worth by saying, “Hey, our sense of worth is associated with our support of Eskimos?”
It got downright comic with Donald Trump accusing Democratic Jews of being ‘antisemitic’ because they don’t love Israel as much as his cucked-ass-self does. MAGA maggots’ devotion to Zion is total and absolute despite supposedly misguided Jews(the great majority of whom are Democrats) striking hot pokers up their arse. If the Jesus’ shtick was an unwavering compassion and love for humanity despite being whupped and crucified by it, the ‘conservative’ position is an undying love for Jews despite all the slings and arrows hurled at them by the Tribe. “They know not what they do.” But, it’s really a conceit because most ‘conservatives’ are really motivated by the desire to win over Jewish power and wealth. It’s not about compassion for powerless Jews but prostration before powerful Jews.
What Jews fear most about Russia, MAGA, and national populism in general is the emergence of pan-white-race-ism, by inference if not by intention. It’s obvious Putin’s Russia has no desire to lead or unite the white world. At best, Russia wants good relations with the West, as well as with East Asia and the Global South. Also, as Putin and his Soviet-era generation were weaned on national myths arising from the Great Patriotic War, they are as invested ideologically in ‘anti-racism’ and denunciation of racial supremacism associated with Nazism. And the Cold War was, to a large extent, the White West and White East competing for the hearts and minds for the nonwhite world, a game of which side is less ‘racist’.
Given post-war consensus in the West has made explicit white pride almost synonymous with ‘racism’, Russia doesn’t want to make a big thing about race. As for most MAGA folks and Trump, they know and care nothing about Russia and, at best, seek cordial relations rather than another ‘cold war’. But Jews are paranoid mind-readers and sniff out the implications of Russia’s place in the world and rise of populism, essentially white, in the US and EU. Even if Russia isn’t racially motivated, it is nevertheless a white majority country and a huge and independent one at that. Unlike the US, Anglosphere, and the EU, it isn’t led by cuck goyim who do the bidding of their Jewish masters. It is also vast and full of natural resources, capable of weathering the slings and arrows of World Jewry.
Also, Russia is about national pride based on roots, culture, history, and achievements. If anything, Russian nationalists may feel historical grievances about what Jewish Bolsheviks did to their civilization. And there’s immense pride in the sacrifices during World War II. If Nazism is the greatest evil the world has ever known, Russians can claim not only to have been its biggest victims(as the Soviet Union lost the greatest number of lives by far, though a good many of them were non-Russians) but the biggest victors over it. There’s nothing comparable to ‘white guilt’ in Russia.
Anti-Slavicism, especially among Anglo-Brits, was once comparable to Antisemitism. It’s worth noting Jews heavily contributed to the negative image of Russians in the West, at least prior to the Bolshevik Revolution — while Jewish animus against Tsarist Russia was understandable given the discrimination and pogroms, the Anti-Russian ‘tropes’ pushed by Jews were as over-the-top and virulent as Anti-Semitic ones, and in our time, Anti-Russian vitriol, called ‘Russophobia’ by some, is beyond belief; it’s as if the hostile energies once invested against Jews in the West have been channeled against Russians, to the delight of Jews who apparently have nothing against antisemitic-like feelings AS LONG AS they’re directed at peoples hated by them.
For both Anglos(and Germans) and Jews, the Russians were the lesser whites ‘unfairly’ blessed with too much land & resources and should somehow be made subordinate to the West. If antisemitism is now one of the, if not the, biggest taboo in the West, Anti-Russo-Slavicism is very much in vogue and has reached levels comparable to National Socialism’s Culture War on Jewish influence and achievements. Western ‘Canceling’ Russia in the 21st century is a variation of National Socialism’s all-out war on everything Jewish but allowed and encouraged because the current West, under total Jewish Control, operates on the mode of “Is it great for Jewish Power?” Just as Jews, who’d once decried McCarthyism as the greatest violation of American civil liberties, now enforce far more stringent and extensive forms of persecution and censorship of dissident voices, they are now working with Sub-Nazi elements in Ukraine despite having tirelessly condemned Nazism as the one ideology/movement that could never ever be tolerated or rehabilitated — It suits Jewish supremacism to see Ukro-Slavs(who fancy themselves as superior ‘Aryans’) and Russo-Slavs slaughtering each other. According to the Jewish Theory of Political Relativity, the only principle is “Jews feel like it”. Just look how Victoria Nuland spews nothing but lies, but in her mind, she is always speaking the truth even when she’s lying because she’s serving Jewish supremacist power, the only real truth to people like her.
The current Ukraine conflict is rather like how the US, with considerable Jewish influence, encouraged Saddam Hussein to provoke a war with Iran that lasted ten years and took over a million lives. What do Americans and Jews care about all those dead Muslims? ‘Dead Muslims’ matter only in China’s treatment of the Uighurs when, in fact, the West has done far worse in the Middle East and North Africa. Besides, if Russia took a hard line in Chechnya and if China is taking no chances in Xinjiang, it is precisely because the West has routinely used intelligence, subversion, and covert operations to foment trouble in those parts of the world. Neither Russia nor China can allow a live-and-let-live attitude in certain parts of their domain because the Jewish-controlled US uses every trick in the book to create problems there. Russia wasn’t sufficiently vigilant, and the Jewish-run West got the Right Sector to topple the government in Ukraine. Assad was asleep at the wheel, and the Jewish-led West armed a whole lot of radical Muslims to tear Syria apart.
Even though there is no direct link between Russians and MAGA populism, Jews fear that increasing numbers of whites in the West may look to Russia for inspiration, especially in the age of the internet and free flow of information. Besides, populism today isn’t like that of yesteryear when it was usually associated with dirt poor farmers and working class folks who were ill-informed, barely educated, and semi-literate(or even illiterate). Populism has come a long way from the Huey Long era. In the ALL THE KING’S MEN, the hicks would be grateful for the most basic services and protections from the government. In our time, even people without M.A or Ph.D or any college education can find news and information on the internet and learn all kinds of stuff. Arguably, Joe Schmoe living in a small town has more access to information from all over the world than the staff at the New York Times and Washington Post before the internet. Of course, many populist-oriented folks use information badly and fall for a lot of ‘fake news’ and stuff like Q-Anonsense, but then, the educated elites haven’t done themselves proud either by falling for Russia Collusion Hoax, the BLM cult, Globo-Homo degeneracy, Covid nuttery, and whatever nonsense the Jewish-controlled media complex hypes at the moment for no other reason or purpose than serving Jewish Supremacism.
Anyway, populism today is far smarter and better informed than its past incarnations. Also, as Tucker Carlson argued, populist passions are symptoms of a society grown sick under a corrupt elite. Naturally, the people look to the elites for leadership, guidance, and truth(or at least the half-truth). Populism begins to stir when the people begin feeling that the elites are corrupt, craven, clueless, uncaring, decadent, degenerate, demented, and/or unresponsive to their needs. Politicians were always a bunch of whores and sleazebags, but the idea of shared National Interest and Principled Progress have been ditched in favor of mindless idolization of Zionism and Jews(and their favorite allies, the Homos/Trannies and Blacks). Today’s so-called ‘conservatives’ conserve nothing and only suck up to Jewish Power, and today’s ‘liberals’ are anti-liberal, always in obeisance to what Jews demand — when they say ‘hate speech’ is not Free Speech, they aren’t talking about Zionism that led to the ‘genocide’ of Palestinians, Neocon warmongering that have destroyed entire countries, BLM lies that led to burning cities & pogroms, Jewish war on whiteness(as a kind of ‘cancer’), Globo-Homo’s hatred of sexual norms/truths, or the mindless anti-Russian hysteria. (Jewish War on ‘hetero-normativity’ is quite revealing. It’s posed as a problem, even an injustice, but hetero IS normal. From the Jewish perspective, normality recognized as normative for most people is unacceptable and must be deconstructed and pathologized. No wonder we live in a world where ‘woman’ can have a penis, and a ‘man’ can have a baby.) With their minds totally owned by Jews, today’s so-called ‘liberals’ are into the mob-violence of ‘punch a Nazi’ in the US and ‘fund the Nazi’ in Ukraine. In other words, always bark according to Jewish commands. And, for all their clamor for ‘social justice’, they are mostly silent about Neo-McCarthyite suppression of Palestinian voices and the BDS movement. And as higher education has been taken over by ‘woke’ dogma, facts and logic must take back seat to idolatry and narratives, mostly in favor of Jews, homos/trannies, and blacks.
If the so-called ‘people of color’(who aren’t black) have any place in this new order, their duty is to suck up to Jews, idolize blacks, celebrate globo-homo, and blame it all on whitey(or Russia or China). People who used to sympathize with Galileo(in the controversy with the Catholic Church) are now for the cathedralization or Vaticanization of truth or knowledge, with the ‘experts’(or ‘experverts’) deciding for us what is ‘acceptable’ information or ‘disinformation’. Incredibly, so-called ‘liberals’ relinquished any real claim on Free Speech, which is now with the Populist Right than with any other group. To them, ‘truth’ is merely a matter of ‘trust the science’, with ‘science’ being whatever the Jewish Deep State deems to be conveniently ‘true’ in the current year, month, week, day, or hour. Or they go for pat formulations like ‘love is love’, meaning that there is no biological or moral difference between real sex involving proper organs and homo fecal penetration.
Even though the vast majority of Americans are under the Jewish supremacist spell(and retardedly support the ‘Ukrainian’ side when, in fact, current Ukraine is totally a puppet state of globalist Jews who stoop so low as to work with sub-Nazi types for political expediency), there are signs that a good number of Americans(and Europeans) are waking up to the dangers and sheer lunacy of globalism, a strange brew of universalist goy cuckery and Jewish tribal supremacism with blacks and homos as proxies. Despite his lifelong Germanophilia and anti-Slavic bias, Pat Buchanan began to notice during the Putin years that Russia of all places was becoming the bastion of traditional European values, relatively speaking of course. The popular online personality Steve Turley has noted the rise of the ‘civilizational states’ rooted in heritage and history at odds with the globalist world order that seeks to sever all roots.
From his perspective, Putin is the good, or at least the better, guy when the West’s agenda is aligned with likes of George Soros whose mindfuc*ery goes so far as to encourage little boys to have their nuts cut off and to smear countless Trump supporters as ‘domestic terrorists’, which would also include parents who object to their children being indoctrinated with porny propaganda and anti-white CRT cooked up by Jewish ‘scholars’ and their dimwit goy minions.
According to the globalists, it boils down to ‘liberal democracy’ versus ‘autocracy’, but ‘liberal democracy’ is defined by product rather than by process. Outcome matters, not the principle. So, a nation like Hungary can hold fair elections and elect a man like Viktor Orban who wants to preserve Hungarian folk and culture, but that is ‘autocracy’, simply because it’s not the desired outcome. But if nasty and vicious Jews like Victoria Nuland and their cuck goy flunkies like John McCain & Lindsay Graham work behind the scenes to pull off a coup in Ukraine with the aid of Right Sector and sub-nazi elements, that is ‘democracy’ because it was the desired outcome.
So, the process mean NOTHING to the Jewish globalist supremacist. No matter how democratic the process, it isn’t ‘democracy’ if the outcome isn’t what Jews want. But, no matter how undemocratic the process, it is ‘democracy’ if it is what Jews want. Consider how Jewish power responded to Donald Trump’s election in 2016. Some were even urging the deep state and the military to do everything possible to remove him. And the hyper-fraudulent 2020 election, made all the worse by Covid-hysteria, proved beyond a doubt that Jewish Power is pure gangsterism and tribal supremacism, and totally without honor as it rants about ‘muh democracy’ while rigging elections right and left Third World style. The danger wasn’t the US slipping into a banana republic but a bagel one.
Or, consider the Jewish efforts to monopolize all information. Even their biggest lies are sold as Real News whereas anything that counters them is construed as ‘fake news’ or ‘disinformation’. Jewish globalists say it’s a wild, crazy conspiracy theory to ponder the Great Replacement, all the while openly celebrating the demise of White America due to mass immigration of nonwhites orchestrated by the Tribe. This is so obvious, but even now, most American ‘conservatives’ are spineless and gutless cucks of Jewish Power. Given most whites are sheeple & followers and given that most white leaders are castrated cucks to Jews, this shouldn’t be surprising.
But, there is Russia, which stands as a self-sufficient power that insists on its own path and perspectives. If the Collective West is Jugromo-centric(or Jewish-Negro-Homo-centric), Russia is Russo-centric, which is intolerable for Jews. And in our internet age, more white eyes are opening to the Russian Way despite Russia having no plan to lead the white world or proselytize its model as the correct one for the West. Russia has mainly sought diplomatic and business ties, unwilling to engage in a culture war, i.e. live-and-let-live attitude of let the West do its own thing and Russia its own, but this is unacceptable to Jews who are hellbent on spreading Jugromo-centrism around the world, especially white countries.
Still, when whites in the West have nothing to turn to for meaningful leadership, they are beginning to recognize Russia as an inspiration. What both Jews and their hated white enemies recognize is Russia may be the last white holdout, even bastion, of white sovereignty. And increasing numbers of Americans are considering the Orthodox Faith when the Catholic Church has become a den of pedophile globalists led a flaky pope, Mainline Church is globo-homo central, and Evangelicalism has degenerated into ‘Muh Israel’ retardation. This is why Jews want to destroy Russia and, if unable, turn it into such a pariah that it will seem ‘treasonous’ for anyone to be sympathetic with Russia’s ‘civilizational’ path.
It seems Jews are trying to stay ahead of the game. Instead of allowing time to warm relations, if only in spirit of mutuality, patriotic Russians and patriotic Americans(and white patriots the world over), Jews are hard at work preempting such an alliance of the heart and mind by vilifying Russia as the Evil Other. So, everything Russia(or Hungary) stands for is ‘far right’ and ‘extreme’, such as respect for tradition and religion(one that isn’t debased into worship of George Floyd, Harvey Milk, and ‘Muh Israel’), centrality of family life, reality of the sexes, national sovereignty, and healthy norms. All such are now deemed ‘extreme’ and ‘far right’, and what Official America now stands for is tranny-wanny nuttery, globo-homo revelry, Negromania, open/broken borders, slut pride, and whatever-else-Jews-want(even to the point where science must bend the rules of biology to prop up the notion of man-as-’woman’). The real extreme is now promoted as the New Normal whereas the healthy and natural normal is reviled as ‘far right’ and ‘extremism’.
Now, to better understand the psychology of white cuck support of Ukraine(which has no sovereignty and is really a puppet-colony of the Jewish Empire), it’s useful to remember the control the British had over their nonwhites subjects all over the world. Take India for example, the Jewel in the Crown, the most prized possession due to its huge population, reasonably talented native elites, rich history & culture, and huge land mass with strategic location for the naval-oriented British. Before the rise of Indian nationalism and Hindu political consciousness(which was anti-Muslim before it became anti-British, not least because the Brits exploited the divisions between Hindus and Muslims, sometimes favoring Hindus over Muslims and vice versa), Hindus had no agency. They were dazzled by British power and ability. The Brits seemed magical, almost superhuman. The British overlords were feared, even resented and hated at times, but also admired and revered.
Furthermore, as Hindus had long been under the Muslim Mughal Empire, coming under new foreign domination wasn’t anything new. Indeed, many Hindus(and even some Muslims) preferred British rule that brought many advances and opportunities(and for the most part respected Hindu cultures and traditions — some historians even believe that, if not for the British, all of India would likely have been Islamized). And, what later became Hindu and Indian nationalism couldn’t have been possible without the model of Western nationalism, not least because there never was an organic Indian national identity(comparable to that of the Japanese for example). For nationalism to work, be it autocratic or democratic, the ruling elites must claim to represent, lead, and serve their own people. In this sense, true nationalism only emerged with the French Revolution and the American Revolution. Traditionally, in the West and the non-West alike, the people were seen as subjects of the rulers. They served their lords, not vice versa, and the Hindu world was no different. For Hinduism to work as nationalism, it had to, at least in part, overcome its caste divisions and create a sense of bond than bondage, a united people and culture working as one for the common good.
It was only in the late 19th century that there were truly consequential stirrings of Indian nationalism. Until then, most Hindus were either too poor and ignorant to know about the world, and those who were prosperous and/or educated enough to know were spellbound by British prestige. Therefore, few harbored any notion of Indian interest or Hindu agency — besides, the Hindu worldview tended to be passive and anti-agency, i.e. things happen as they do because the cosmos wills it so, and there’s nothing that can be done about it. So enthralled were the Hindus with awesome British power(displayed with pomp and circumstances as if cosmic karma was on its side) that British destiny defined and dictated Indian destiny. British Policy was Indian policy, British Loves were Indian loves, British Hatreds were Indian hatreds. Brits recruited and trained Indians to fight, and the most prized were the Sikhs, akin to their Janissaries.
The British ruled not only with material carrots and sticks but with iconography, narrative, and ‘values’. Education under British rule convinced many Hindu elites that the British had a right to rule because they were so great and awesome, almost divine and magical. So, if the British needed Indians to fight in Africa, the Indians did so. If the British needed Indians to support Queen and Country against Germany, the Indians did so, despite the fact that Indians had no reason to be anti-German. After all, Germany had no designs on India, and it was the British, not the Krauts, who were ruling over Indians, sometimes with an iron fist. Yet, until the rise of Hindu nationalism and Indian Independence Movement, the de rigueur attitude among Hindu elites was to just go along without asking too many questions.
But how times have changed! Recently, the Collective West sanctioned Russia like no country has ever been sanctioned before. And the West expected India to comply and join in the anti-Russian hate-fest, but India said, “No, thanks”. India acted on the basis of its own national interest and autonomy. It refused to be pushed around by the West. Also, many in India noticed the obvious hypocrisy. The US has been invading and destroying country after country, but most of the West didn’t condemn the actions or call for sanctions against the US. Furthermore, these invasions were truly unprovoked, essentially the work of Jewish ‘neocons’ who see the world as a grand chess game for Jewish Supremacy. In contrast, Russia was provoked relentlessly until it finally chose war, but so many in the West are acting so ‘outraged’ by all those Russo-Slavs with their boiling blood. The current West is ridiculous.
But, is it any more ridiculous or really all that different from the mentality of Hindus under British Rule? Why did Hindus so dutifully support and join in the fights that were all about British Imperial ambitions and had nothing to do with Indian interests? Even as late as World War II, Winston Churchill had the most contemptuous view of Indians as dirty ‘wogs’. If anything, the Hindus, despite their inferior position, collaborated with the British to crush other subjects of the British Empire. (To be sure, despite inferiority to the British, they appreciated their relative superiority over other subjects deemed even more inferior. They were superiors among the inferiors, and of course, such bargain is what white ‘conservatives’ and even dissident right types like Jared Taylor and John Derbyshire dream about, i.e. they are willing to accept Jews as superiors IF Jews were to favor them as superiors among the goy inferiors.) The obvious thing would have been for all nonwhite subjects of European Imperialists to wake up and realize they have something in common: They needed to struggle for liberation from foreign rule. On the other hand, many native individuals felt more liberated under foreign European rule than under domestic rule that was relatively more tyrannical.
Therefore, national liberation had meaning in terms of justice only on the European nationalist model, one where the leaders and the people are bonded as One People. If the imperialists were expelled only to revive the old indigenous tyranny, the natives would once again be helots and peons, even if under their own kind. Indeed, one reason why so much of the world came under European rule was because the local elites were too occupied keeping the masses down to harness their true potential; naturally in such order, the masses were too hunkered down, obeying orders, and doing as told to ever think outside the box of blind duty and think in national terms. Western Imperialism most likely would have lasted much longer but for the fact that it spread European-style nationalism to the natives, something which the nonwhites eventually came to appreciate and use it for their own purposes. Nonwhites initially thought that the white masses in the Metropole were much like themselves, subjects of the empire, but they realized there was a sense of bond and mutuality between white elites and white masses, the heart of nationalism.
Anyway, here we are in the Current Year. Today, Hindus have their own viable and sovereign nationalism. They have cultural and political agency and think & act according to what they deem to be in their interests and integral to what they are. Also, they worship their own gods, both spiritual and secular(the men who struggled for Indian Independence). They don’t need Jews telling them to place BLM above the heroes of India. (In contrast, the so-called West, on both sides of the Atlantic and even Down Under, has been led to place Negrolatry above whiteness; Europeans have been made to believe there is nothing meaningfully white about European history, culture, and identity. Hindu temples in India aren’t festooned with globo-homo symbolism like christian churches in the so-called West, which goes to show a lot of so-called ‘Christians’ are little more than soul-slaves of Jews, but then why are whites worshiping some dead Jew as the Son of God? Because the lacked the vision to dream up their own God.)
Hindus today aren’t like the Hindus of old who eagerly collaborated with the British. Back then, it wasn’t too difficult for the Brits to win over the Hindus due to the Muslim Factor and Caste System. As long as Hindus regarded Brits as the new, the other, and preferred imperialists over the Muslim Mughals, the Empire was seen favorably. Also, given the profound caste divisions among Hindus, the Hindu spiritual and/or economic elites felt little sense of camaraderie with the lower castes and were more than willing to collaborate with the British who seemed like the karmic lords of the universe. It was only later when Hindu elites educated abroad learned of the power of nationalism(as the core foundation of European World Power, i.e. British Empire grew out of British National Unity), attained a fuller appreciation of their own great histories(largely due to Western archaeology that recovered lost time), and came to resent Western social-political barriers against even the most qualified nonwhites(who’d done everything to play by white rules) that they began to forge a nationalism of their own, which wasn’t easy for Hindus because of deep-rooted caste divisions, but men like Gandhi and Nehru deftly managed to balance old and new.
At the social level, caste system still operates in myriad ways in India(and among Indians abroad, like in Silicon Valley), but politically speaking, Hinduism emphasizes unity, solidarity, and pride among all Hindus regardless of caste, and without such mindset, the Indian Independence Movement couldn’t have succeeded.
Then, it is no wonder that Jews are pushing a neo-caste mentality on the West, which is why ‘leftism’ is a complete mischaracterization of the Jewish Agenda. Jews are not out for equality or ‘equity’, which only really applies to blacks(in areas where they’re deficient), and that’s because Jews promote blacks as the sacred cows of the West. This isn’t about racial equality but black superiority, along with Jewish and homo superiority, uber alles. BLM isn’t about equal justice for blacks but blacks-being-above-the-law. In the US, blacks kill blacks and lots of non-blacks as well, BUT we are to pretend that blacks are especially being targeted by ‘racists’. Hardly anything is said about black atrocities and horrors against whites, ‘Latinos’, Asians(especially Chinese-Americans), and etc. Black crime and thuggery become issues ONLY WHEN directed at Jews or homos, which reveals how justice operates in the West. A game of who/whom. It is a caste-oriented justice where violence is deemed worse when done to certain ‘protected’ groups. Why are certain groups ‘protected’ while others are not? Why does the US turn a blind eye to Zionist tyranny over Palestinians and Israel’s wars on Arab nations? Because Jews are ‘protected’.
Such ‘protections’ give the false impression that certain groups are especially weak and vulnerable and therefore require special recognition, but Jews are the most powerful people on Earth who’ve raped entire economies and killed millions in the 21st century with wars, sanctions, and drugs(especially opiods). And blacks are the biggest thugs and criminals in the US, and of course, the biggest threats to themselves as they often murder one another. And why aren’t homos held accountable for their sicko degenerate orgiastic behavior, the vector of various diseases?
Jews push the neo-caste system because they want white elites, the most crucial collaborationist element in Jewish Power, to aspire to higher-caste prestige by worshiping the gods-controlled-by-Jews. Otherwise, white elites might, like the nationalist Hindus in the early 20th century, begin to see themselves as leaders of the white community. (Even implicit signs of this, as in the MAGA movement, are deeply triggering to Jewish Supremacists who want whites to remain in servile mental mode.) So, white elite minds have been instilled with the neo-cosmology of gods and demons controlled by Jews. ‘Racism’, aka ‘white supremacism’(which comprises anything positively white), is the worst of all possible demons, whereas Jews, blacks, and homos constitute the holy trinity.
So, if a white person is eager for status, privilege, and esteem, he or she will decry the stain of whiteness and sever ties with the white masses or any notion of white identity or white interests. If white power is demonic, then whiteness itself must be sick. Therefore, the only way a white person can possess value, especially apart from those irredeemable white ‘racists’, is by kneeling at the altars of Harvey Milk, George Floyd, and Jonathan Pollard. Via their tributes to the gods controlled by Jews, aspiring whites feel themselves to be of a higher caste.
Caste system in India was sustained on the basis of fear of contamination. Higher castes feared being contaminated by lower elements, and at the very bottom were the Dalit caste of ‘Untouchables’. It was one of the reasons why Islam made such rapid gains in India, not least among the lower elements. As followers of the Prophet, they were equal to any Muslim. A rich elite Muslim, at least in theory, regarded even poor Muslims as brothers under the sun. It was the basis of Muslim success in war and conversion.
In contrast, the lower caste Hindu’s dharma or duty was simply to stay in his place and do his duties, and if the caste was rock bottom, as among the untouchables, it was akin to spiritual leprosy, and the other castes took all the troubles to avoid contact with such ‘unclean’ folks. Brahmin especially loathed contact with such lowly beings, but from the karmic cosmological perspective of Hinduism centered on reincarnation, it was deemed just. The soul in an ‘untouchable’ had either been demoted from a higher caste body for some infraction or had been promoted from an animal body. Either way, in order for it to be elevated in the caste hierarchy in the next life, its holder had to accept his place in THIS LIFE and do what was expected of him. If an ‘untouchable’ rejects his cosmic sentence and gains riches & social success, he may have it good in THIS LIFE, but the soul within his body will be further demoted in the NEXT LIFE.
A caste system need not be spiritually based. It could be a matter of race, lineage, or military force. The Russian caste system prior to the abolition of serfdom wasn’t spiritually based, and it’s been customary throughout history for invading people to subjugate the conquered; Spanish under the Moors and Palestinians under the Zionists fall into the category of ‘second class citizens’, and for much of US history, blacks constituted a separate and lower caste, though not necessarily written into the law.
But, spirituality is useful in ‘morally’ validating a caste system whereby inequality is said to be ordained by cosmic design. In other words, the privileged castes are compelled to enforce the system not out of greed or self-interest but in dutiful deference to divine authority. In other words, they have gods on their side. And, this explains why Jews have ‘spiritualized’ secular liberalism into a neo-theology of gods and demons. Under this cosmology, blacks are saints, heroes, and judges. Jews are prophets and the brains of the universe. Homos are angels and fairies. Jews, blacks, and homos don’t need to prove their worth since they are holy by design(or identity).
In contrast, whites must work extra-hard at attaining spiritual ‘wokemon’ points because they’re stained with ‘whiteness’, the source of the worst evils, such as ‘racism’ and ‘white supremacism’, which must be relegated to the ‘untouchable’ ghetto of the Deplorables lest the ‘good whites’ be contaminated. And to constantly cleanse and purify themselves, whites must seek out gurus(usually Jewish, black, or homo) who instruct them on the rituals involving ‘white fragility’, ‘white supremacism’, ‘racism’, ‘antisemitism’, ‘diversity-inclusion-equity’, MLK Worship, George Floyd remembrance(and the proper ways to wash stinky Negro feet), Karen-ism, and etc.
One reason why many ‘woke’ whites took to getting ‘jabbed’ is the Covid Hysteria resonated with their view of the world as a struggle between ‘contamination’ and purification. They associated Covid-19 with Trumpism(while Trump tried to associate it with China), and jabs & masks were to cleanse themselves of the MAGA germ. And now, Russia is the big ‘contaminant’ in the world that dares to profane the holy values of the West, such as Jungle Fever, Negrolatry, Globo-Homo, Tranny-Wanny, Pussy Riot, Cult of Zelensky, and Total & Absolute Submission to Jews. Even some on the Dissident Right are denouncing Russia, and I guarantee this has everything to do with their cuck-maggoty cravenness before Jews, blacks, and homos who are the real destroyers of the West. Afraid to call out on the real villains who rule over them, they act ‘real tough’ by barking at faraway Russia. It’s like a dog cowers before a mean dog nearby but barks at a big dog in the distance.
Western whites are now like the Hindus of old under the British Empire. They are without agency and always look towards Jews for guidance and approval in political, economic, cultural, and military affairs. Whatever Jews say, it’s the only way. That’s pretty much all one needs to know about Ukraine. Most people in the West, especially the US, know little about Russia and can’t tell a Russian from a Ukrainian in ethnicity, language, culture, or history.
So, why are they suddenly so rabidly pro-Ukrainian and frothing at mouth about Evil Russia? The same dynamic that made Hindus take the side of their imperialist overlord against his enemies. Hindus had no reason to be anti-German, but they supported the British war effort in World War I, just like black African soldiers served their French imperialist overlords in Indochina. Whites are now to Jews what Koreans were to the Japanese and then to the Americans: Bitches and whores. Under Japanese rule, Koreans took part in the invasion of China. As a US satellite, South Korea took part in the American destruction of Vietnam and Iraq. Mere dogs of empire without agency. Of course, there were rewards for the collaboration, and it’s no different for whites who roll over for Jews. One thing for sure, while Jews value white talent + submission, they will always favor white mediocrity + white submission to white talent + white agency(especially one that is critical of Jews and Israel). It’s no wonder fools like John Bolton and John McCain got as far as they did despite their lack of any talent or character.
History sure works in mysterious ways. The once-lowly Hindus, who lacked agency and followed in the footsteps of the British Empire, repeating its talking points, fighting its wars, carrying its water, and bearing its symbols(of Queen and Country far far away), are now at the center of a sovereign nation with its own sense of identity, history, and destiny. So, when the Jewish-run West called on the world to sanction and hate on Russia, India refused to do so. Long ago when they were under British Rule, Hindus just nodded along to British commands. Today, India gauges its likes and dislikes in accordance to what-is-good-for-India, rather like how Jews think in terms of “Is it good for the Jews?” (Of course, Hindus in the West, either out of careerist opportunism or ‘woke’ brainwashing, march to the Jewish Supremacist tune, mostly against white goyim.) Jews and Hindus, even in contention, have something in common that is missing among whites: sovereignty, autonomy, and agency. In other words, Hindus have the power to disagree with the Jews who rule the West, an option denied to Western white goyim who must always look over their shoulders for Jewish approval.
Not only have Russia been ‘canceled’ and Russian individuals robbed(like Jewish culture and property by the National Socialists) in the Jewish-run West but any white goy(or conscientious Jew for that matter) who’s dissented from the official narrative, especially by naming the Jewish Role, has also been ‘canceled’, indeed many times worse than red-sympathizing dissidents and radicals during the so-called McCarthy Era. It is about time the term ‘McCarthyism’ should be retired because the new censorship(or censchwarzship) and ‘cancel culture’ are almost entirely directed by Jews, once among the the prime suspects during the ‘Red Scare’. Besides, whereas McCarthyism was a phase that came and went(and had little institutional power), Jewish supremacist tentacles twist into every corner of the West with no end in sight and no pushback, as even those most reviled by Jewish Power never ever mention the power of Jews. Current West isn’t totalitarian but is certainly ‘tentaclitarian’. (Incredibly, whereas the Trump-Russia Collusion thing was a complete fabrication, Jewish role in Soviet espionage and communist subversion were very real. But in the Jewish-run US, the men who pursued actual Jewish communist spies were the bad guys of history while the liars and frauds who perpetrated the Russia-Collusion Hoax, which also destroyed careers and derailed a presidency, are showered with accolades and the power to suppress ‘disinformation’. Talk about a fox, or weasel, in the henhouse.)
White Race is now a total disgrace, a bunch of Whindus or Dotbreads(dot-headed white breads). On the Ukraine issue, just think ‘whindu’, and everything falls into place. It’s so elementary. As if being a bunch of whummies(white dummies) isn’t bad enough, they’ve reconciled themselves to whindu status. It’s even worse because Jews are a lot cleverer than the Brits of old. Whereas British power(and glory) was out front as the victorious and triumphant conquering might over India, Jewish Supremacist Power(the greatest that ever existed, at least upon gaining mastery over the Anglo-Germanics reduced to cuck-hood) remains in the shadows as the political discourse is usually about ‘American Power’, the ‘West’, the ‘Left’, the ‘woke’, ‘diversity-equity-inclusion’, ‘gay pride’, ‘BLM’, ‘democracy vs autocracy’, ‘Russian interference in US elections’, ‘China buying up America’, ‘Clash of Civilizations’(when the biggest real clash is between Jewish Supremacism vs Goy Autonomy), and etc. But trace the puppet strings on each of these issues, and all threads leads to Jewish Supremacism.
For example, notice that ‘equity’ never addresses the vastly disproportionate influence of Jews in institutions and industries. And ‘inclusion’ doesn’t mention the Zionist-supremacist suppression of BDS in ‘blue’ and ‘red’ states alike. And ‘diversity’ hardly addresses the ‘problem’ of under- or zero representation of many groups in the NBA or NFL or the dominance of homos in areas like fashion and style — incredibly, industries catering to women often have more homo toots than women, but then, what is a real woman these days when the powers-that-be(Jewish, of course) strong-armed and brain-twisted every major institution into accepting a hairy tranny with penis and balls as a ‘woman’? Jewish minority uber goy majority, tranny fake-women minority uber real women majority.
Eons ago, the proto-Anglos and the Germanics fell under Roman rule(and later the Russo-Slavs came under Mongol rule) but then gradually emerged as the dominant powers in the world. The Romans are long gone, never to return again, but the Jews, one of the few ancient peoples/cultures to persist to the present, have become the new lords over whites, most crucially the Anglos and the Germanics, the most capable goy groups in the last 150 years.
And, just like the Early Christians(mostly Jewish in origin) conquered the Roman Empire spiritually, secular Zionist Jews conquered the Anglos and Germans quasi-spiritually with Holocaustianity, Negrolatry, and Globo-Homo as the new trinity. The Early Christians didn’t need to militarily conquer Rome. Just capture its soul, and the empire’s military might was in the service of Jesus, a Jew Himself, as the Son of God. Likewise, capture the hearts and minds of Anglos and Germanics with the Tri-Idolatry of Jews, homos, & blacks, and guess what? The Western Empire led by the US as the lone superpower is doing the bidding of Jews as the gurus of all wisdom. And Jewish Power is especially a difficult nut to crack because it controls all sources of power. Unlike Gentile Europe where political power(monarchy), military power(aristocracy), economic power(burgeoning bourgeoisie), spiritual power(church), managerial power(bureaucracy), and intellectual power(scholars and philosophers) served as checks and balances, Jewish Supremacists in our time control the puppet presidents, military-industrial complex, law firms & courts, academia & media, finance-property-tech-entertainment, the deep state, and the spiritual institutions, whereby so-called Mainline churches push globo-homo & Negrolatry while Evangelicals push little else but “Muh Israel” and “Jews are the Chosen, and we must lick their boots or God will kick our butts.”
Then, the Occam’s Razor on Ukraine is quite simple. Whites are Whindus, and lacking agency and autonomy their likes and dislikes are simply a matter of copying whatever the Jews do, just like Hindus of old under British Rule outsourced authority and prestige to the Brits. Indian perspective was always aligned with that of the Brits who commanded the loyalty of the indigenous elites. If Brits were anti-French, Indians were anti-French. If Brits hated Germans or Russians, Indians did too. And if the Empire called on the Indians to serve as managers, merchants, or soldiers in far-flung places, Hindus took up the offer as duty or opportunity. Brits cleverly flattered the top collaborators as almost as good as the White Man, just like Jewish organizations shower prizes and awards on white goyim who most dutifully play along. Britain was the mind, India was the body. Britain was the master, India was the dog… that is until the Indian Independence Movement said NO MORE to all that.
Though Jews use Diversity against whites, the rise of Indian Nationalism showed how diversity could be overcome against a COMMON enemy. Brits had relied on India’s vast diversity to play divide-and-rule among the locals, but Gandhi and Nehru’s movement managed to unite various groups against the British Empire as the oppressor of all Indians. If Jewish Power were to be named, diverse goyim in the US could also unite against Zion as the real top dog of the West. No wonder Jews turn the West’s attention against Russia, Iran, Syria, China, and any other nation with some measure of independence from the Zionic empire. And ‘conservative’ Jews cleverly direct White Populist and Conservative rage at ‘the left’.
No wonder Jews are so adamant about no one naming The Real Power, distracting people with nonsense about Russian interference, Chinese threat, Iran as sponsor of terrorism, autocrat Viktor Orban, Assad the ‘butcher’, and even Venezuela. One thing for sure, Indian Nationalism wouldn’t have worked without naming the British Power. Likewise, Jews will continue to exploit ever-growing diversity against goyim unless their power is named and exposed as the real mover and shaker.
Sadly, even many on the so-called Dissident Right seek not liberation from Jewish Power but to its favored bitch status, like Indian Hindus and Indian Muslims, prior to the Independence Movement, vied for top dog position under the British Empire. “O Master Jew, favor us white dogs over those nonwhite dogs, and we will serve you so faithfully, far more than any bunch of nonwhite dogs would.” So utterly pathetic. Whites in the West have no Gandhi, Ho Chi Minh, Castro, or even Nasser or Sukarno. They have a bunch of Diems and Batistas.
To the casual or outside observer, however, the West is ruled by whites and ‘Christians’ because Jews remain in the shadows, even if so obvious. Just look at Joe Biden’s administration, and it’s as if Jews lost all inhibitions about grabbing just about everything. But you better not notice because noticing is a thought crime. No wonder they scream so much about ‘white supremacism’ to keep the public focused on the threat from Evil Whites lest people finally notice it’s the Jews at the helm. In a way, Joe Biden is the perfect embodiment of the state of white politics that is brain-dead and soul-dead in utter cuckery to Jews. What a Whindu.
