Hills stripped of trees eventually collapse into mudslides. Without deep roots to contain the soil and without leaves to soften the rain, hillsides without trees invariably wash away in mudslides with horrible consequences. We’ve all been informed of the importance of nature and forests. If nature is despoiled for short-term gain, the chain-reaction of destruction can cause irreparable harm. Not only are the trees gone but the animals, plants, and other organisms that depend on them. And then, other organisms that depend on those organisms also become endangered. As humans ultimately rely on nature, short-term gain can turn into long-term loss, even the destruction of mankind. Entire civilizations perished due to their short-sighted plundering of nature.
What goes for nature also goes for the mind. Mental health can be destroyed like nature. The removal of something essential and indispensable from the mind sets off a destructive series of ‘events’. It reverberates far beyond the initial impact and harm. It’s like the removal of an essential organ affects the entire body, one detrimental effect leading to another then another. What goes for the body goes for the mind, which is really part of the body.
When the mind is ‘deforested’ of what makes people essentially moral, spiritual, cultural, and thoughtful, the human soul no longer binds as one. Bereft of meaning, sound standards, depth of reference, and true conviction, the mind turns into mush or mud that can be molded into anything. The mind goes from precious metal to malleable plastic.
Such fluidity of mind is rarely, if ever, the facilitator of true freedom and individuality. Mud-minds and plastic-brains are almost always molded by forces that disparage tradition in favor of fashion, the choice instrument of mass manipulation. Because their conscious(and subconscious) spaces are not held together by forests of the mind with roots in family, culture, history, and spirituality, their semblances of thoughts, feelings, and decisions are like so many mudslides or mental diarrhea.
A properly cultured mind requires something more than standard education, especially if education has been reduced to indoctrination in the latest ‘intellectual’ fads aimed at impressionable young ones with single-mothers or soulless parents whose idea of culture is Pop Culture and whose idea of values come from the corrupt Jewish-monopoly media(elite and mass. Given the sheer mindlessness and mendacity that are passed off as intellectual thought or ideological priorities in the Current West, it’s obvious hat intelligence and knowledge alone won’t save anyone’s mind and soul.
Intelligence is merely a tool and often caves to emotions. Intelligence seeks the truth only when directed towards it. When people with intelligence are instilled, especially at impressionable periods and/or vulnerable moments in their lives, with strong emotions in relation to myths, fantasies, falsehoods, or disingenuous narratives, the element of sheer passion overrides facts and reason.
For example, just how did so many intelligent people come to believe in the divinity of Jesus over the centuries? Because Christianity had such an emotional, cultural, and spiritual hold on them. Why did so many highly intelligent people become swept up, rather unthinkingly(or monomaniacally), with Marxism/Communism? It wasn’t only the conceit of partaking of a movement that supposedly figured everything out and unified all relevant knowledge but the radical conviction that one was on the side of angels or historical justice. And yet, given the nobility of Jesus’s teachings and the power of Karl Marx’s vision, those who wholeheartedly accepted the Christian Faith or Communist Destiny were not necessarily deforested of the mind, at least not entirely so. Whatever harm that the religion of Christianity or the ideology of Communism may have done to the human psyche, it also planted new seeds that could grow into trees of meaning, understanding, redemption, and/or justice. Neither was animated by nihilism, hedonism, or degeneracy.
But take a look at our world. We see women with green, purple, or pink hair. Such numbnuts now come in all types and ages. They aren’t always silly teens trying to be ‘different’ but middle-aged women. Why would a full-grown woman do such a thing to her hair? If a 10 yr old girl made herself look like Cyndi Lauper or some cartoon figure, it might be ‘cute’. But why would full-grown women, especially one with college degrees and professional responsibilities(and with family and children), go about doing stupid things to their hair(or getting ugly tattoos)? (Granted, such women tend to be ‘cat ladies’ than women with families, but then, there is no lack of trashy mothers either.)
Why would so many people, parents and children, defile and sully their bodies with ugly tattoos? What goes on in their minds when they decide on such acts of folly? Don’t they have a larger sense of life, i.e. what is ‘cool’ today maybe ‘fool’ tomorrow. Even if they are only stuck in the Moment, why would anyone with even a smidgen of sense believe that he or she looks better with body graffiti that are invariably stupid, vulgar, and trashy? I can understand some primitive tribes where tattoos carry cultural significance. Or someone who’s been to hell and back in war and got a tattoo to signal camaraderie with his band of brothers. But what exactly is the meaning of tattoos to the fools who decide to splatter their bodies with in-erasable ugliness?
What’s done to the body is decided by the mind, and one wonders why so many people in the West(and in their satellites) have fallen into the habit of harboring dumb thoughts and fetishes that usually lead to disastrous results. (What tattoos are to skin, various illicit drugs are to the soul. Kicks and highs are offered as substitutes for meaning and health.)
Obviously, both stupid ‘cat ladies’ with funny-colored hair and morons obsessed with tattoos possess mud-minds. They are putty in the hands of globalist Jews who fill up their minds with the latest fads, cultural and political. Unlike status-anxious brown-nosing politicians who toe the latest Party Line for opportunism, so many in so-called ‘woke’ community hysterically espouse the latest crusade or craze with zero awareness that, not so long ago, they hadn’t a care or a clue on the topic. Their ex-lax minds slide and flow with whatever BS is cooked up by the Media Machine.
Evidently in their formative years, their minds were not planted with trees bearing the fruits of truth and meaning. Instead, the baleful influence of the 2 PC’s, Political Correctness and Pop Culture, uprooted whatever that was nascent & normal, decent, and healthy. In their stead, toxins were injected and plastic trees(with only the semblance of the real thing) were planted. For sure, ‘Gay marriage’ is to real marriage what a plastic tomato is to a real tomato. No, ‘love is love’ is not true love. Homo fecal-penetration is not equal in worth, meaning, and purpose to the true sexuality that produced all the life in the world since the beginning of time.
As such, the generations especially from the Boomers onward(and gone full-retard with the Millennials) have the kinds of minds that can be mud-slid into oblivion. Little that is deep, meaningful, and true clings to them. Their minds tend to be vulnerable & defenseless, so gullible and eloping with the latest stupidity. How else can one explain monstrosities such as ‘gay marriage’, the dementia of Afrophilia or Negrolatry(as if blacks, the most criminal race, are a bunch of saints), the ludicrousness of Jew-Worship(as if Zionists need protection from the countless Palestinians and Muslims terrorized by the Wars for Israel), and the clown-world notion that a man is a ‘woman’ simply because he feels like it.
What are the factors that hold a mind together and maintain its resistance to the decadent, even degenerate, fads and fashions that now define so much of the 2 PC’s, pop culture and political correctness? What allows for a healthy ecosystem of the mind, a kind of psycho-system, one that can weather and survive the winds, rain, and hailstorms of Corrupt and Venal Power?
A strong sense of individuality is surely one but not in the libertarian sense that each individual should consider himself/herself as the center of the universe or idolize the great individual(usually some business tycoon) as godlike and beyond reproach.
No, every individual is part of a link, an inheritor of a legacy. We are surrounded with things that we, as individuals, didn’t create. While we are more than ants in a colony, we are similar to ants in that we are bound to a larger community. Individuality is priceless, but we need to understand and appreciate that we are part of a family, culture, history, spirituality, and territory. Even for the non-religious, certain spiritual ideas beneficially restrain excesses of hubris or hysteria. For know-it-all intellectuals and brainiacs, God as a metaphor can serve as a reminder of the limitations of human knowledge and achievement. The concept of God can also be beneficial to those with a heavy tendency toward arousal or sensualism: A contract or consensus among ‘arousalists’ that there must be something more meaningful and deeper than the tingly pleasures of the flesh. Without the concept of God or something equivalent, too many people are prone to self-worship, arrogance, mammon, or fervor of the moment(aka the Current Year).
Global Warming Hysteria is one such example. While global warming caused by CO2 may indeed be a problem, the sheer absolute certainty bordering on quasi-millenarianism among its proselytizers is truly a sight to behold. Instead of offering up better science and data with cool minds, they act as though they are 100% certain that UNLESS things go their way, it’s End of the World for sure in a few decades. If anything is heating up real fast, it’s their self-righteousness. While serious concern for the environment is laudable, especially as humans have despoiled much of the planet, the sheer arrogance of certainty bordering on megalomania(or ‘megalogaia’) suggests that what is sadly lacking in their lives is a true sense of spirituality.
The forest of the mind needs real connection to family(even bordering on sentimentality as it is only within the family that one is allowed unabashed emotions that are essential to life), and this means having a man who knows what it is to be a father and a woman who knows what it is to be a mother. And this familial sense must be expansive as the concept of the nuclear family, though useful in the modern setting, tends to over-emphasize one’s own family and its independence from kinfolk. The nuclear family is convenient and desirable in that each family is guaranteed its freedom and agency. Just like we, as individuals, want our private spaces, most families prefer their own separate spaces.
Still, family bonds within and without are much richer when there is a larger sense of connection and communication among relatives including grandparents, uncles, aunts, cousins, nephews, and nieces. There needs to be ways of communication, meetings, gatherings, rituals, and remembrance that remind everyone that he or she isn’t alone in the world or isn’t primarily part of some faddish subculture but is instead a part of a deep lineage. This used to be taken for granted in the past, but with so many children being an only-child, raised by single-parents(or even grandmothers or foster homes), and addicted to pop culture(and deracinated by PC), we can no longer take for granted the sense of belonging and obligations that come with Familial-Consciousness.
The forest of the mind also needs true spirituality. There are several true religions of great reach and depth. If one finds it impossible to literally believe in God or gods in the modern era(and this would include myself), we can still appreciate the old religions and mythologies for their striving and meaning. One doesn’t have to be Jewish, Christian, Muslim, Hindu, Buddhist, or Greco-paganist to draw inspiration from the faiths and fables that served as the visionary and spiritual bedrock of entire civilizations. While it is only natural to seek new meanings in our world of rapid change, one mustn’t confuse the latest fad or fervor as a worthy substitute for the great religions and myths of the past. While it’s possible that there will be new prophets and revelations in times to come, they most certainly won’t be the products of the Current Power whose main(even sole) priority is to hog all the wealth and privilege for itself. Then, it’s no wonder that the Power has been so hard at work in deforesting the hearts-and-souls of modern folks to be washed away like mudslides under the barrage of globalist PC and Pop Culture.
The forest of the mind also needs real culture and true sensibility, just like the body needs real food and real nutrients. While candy, doughnuts, and ice-cream are acceptable as occasional snacks, they’re not to be confused with real food, the kind with proteins and vitamins. Similarly, a civilization with pop culture as its main culture is like someone who mainly gorges on junk food and candy as his/her main diet. Why is our culture so sick(and sickly), fatuous, disgusting, imbecile, retarded, infantile, and/or excessive? It’s due to the decline in sensibility, indeed to the point where even the (so-called) experts cannot tell real culture from junk culture. Consider the risible rise of Pop Art in the art world. Consider how superhero comic book movies have come to dominate the discourse about cinema. Consider how the biggest literary events are stuff like HARRY POTTER, HUNGER GAMES, TWILIGHT, FIFTY SHADES OF GRAY, or some teen or teen-inspired fiction. People who don’t know real culture from junk culture have lost the forest of the mind. Their minds are like the hills of Haiti that’s been stripped of trees and overruns with mud when it pours. By the way, Real Culture is much more than high or serious culture. It’s about the art of living, sense of family and obligations, preservation of meaningful rites & rituals, sense of history & continuity, and a moral sense. Modernity’s fixation on exhibitionism in all things have narrowly defined culture as arts and entertainment when it’s really a way of life.
Much more can be said on this subject, and this is only a start. But one thing for sure, we need an Arbor’s Day of the mind. We need to sow the seeds and plant the trees of truth, meaning, culture, and justice within our psyche. By ‘truth’, we mean the poison weeds of false narratives planted in our minds by the capitalist-globalist Jewish-monopoly media must be pulled out. And by ‘justice’, we need something sounder than the Tri-Idolatry that elevates Jews, Homos, and Negroes as the most sacred groups whom all others must worship and serve. What is the SJW(social justice warrior) or JJ(Justice Junkie) dogma really about? It’s not about justice based on truth, facts, reason, and reciprocity but about hysteria based on idol-worshiping of certain groups(Jews, blacks, and homos) as the sole arbiters of wisdom and holiness. It’s a form of inverted supremacism that, while denouncing ‘white supremacism’, goes full blast in promoting Jews, blacks, and homos as more worthy than other groups. Just ask the Palestinians.
We must de-salinize our minds of the poison salt of PC. We must remove the fake plastic plants of pop culture. And in their place, we must plant the trees of true meaning and conviction. Otherwise, our minds will be piles of mud that will not hold against the deluge of globalist pap and rot.
And we need self-realization and self-actualization more than ever because even the institutions of True Religions are now in the hands of the globalist agents who, wittingly or not, are aiding and abetting in the deforestation of the mind to turn all of our souls into one collective mud-flood flowing into the cesspool of mammonite idolatry of Jews, homos, and Negroes.
Donald Trump may have been useful as a monkey wrench tossed into the globalist machine, but he too is a depraved creature of depraved times, one where even the majority of so-called ‘conservatives’ are okay with ‘gay marriage’ and pander to the worship of the Holy Three. ‘Gulliberals’ and ‘Cuckservatives’ constitute the mainstream positions in the Age of Mud.
We need a garden of true liberals and true conservatives who complement one another in the preservation and progress of a sane and sound society. And such a mind garden can only be created out of a true forest with real trees of knowledge and remembrance. In this age of degenerates, we need the re-emergence of the regenerates.
We've all heard of stories from around the world where hills stripped of trees surrender their soil to mudslides. Without roots to hold the dirt in place and without leaves to soften the pummel of rain, hills without trees invariably wash away in mudslides that do great damage to outlying areas. This is why, since childhood, we've all been instructed of the importance of nature and forests. If nature is despoiled for short-term gain, the damage can be irreparable as the loss of trees unleashes a chain-reaction of destruction. Not only are the trees gone but all the animals, plants, and other organisms that depend on them. And then, other organisms that depend on those organisms also become endangered, and many perish. As humans ultimately rely on nature, what had been short-term gain turns into long-term loss, even destruction for mankind. Indeed, entire civilizations perished because of their short-sighted exploitation of nature.
What goes for nature also goes for the mind. Human souls can be destroyed just like nature. When something essential, fundamental, and true is removed from the life of the mind, it sets off a series of 'mental events' that reverberate far and wide. The impact is not limited to the initial loss but gradually or even dramatically expands to other dimensions of the mind. It's like the removal of an organ affects the entire body, which begins to fall apart like dominoes. What is true of body is also of mind. When the mind is 'deforested' of what makes us essentially human, moral, philosophical, spiritual, and/or cultural, the human soul doesn't hold together. Having no deep meaning, sound standard, richness of reference, and true conviction, the mind turns into mud and can be molded into anything. The mind goes from precious metal to malleable plastic. Such fluidity of mind is rarely, if ever, the facilitator of true freedom and individuality. Mud-minds and plastic-brains are almost always molded by the Power that, in our world, favors fashion over tradition because slaves to fashion are so easy to manipulate with the latest craze or outrage. Because their conscious(and subconscious) spaces are not held together by forests of the mind with roots in family, culture, history, and spirituality, their thoughts, feelings, and actions are like so many mudslides or mental diarrhea. A properly cultured mind is not only about education. Indeed, if education turns into indoctrination dishing out the latest 'intellectual' fads, especially to impressionable young ones with single-mothers or soulless parents whose idea of culture is Pop Culture and whose idea of values come from the corrupt Jewish-monopoly media(elite and mass), then it can do more harm than good. Given the sheer mindlessness and mendacity that pass themselves off as intellectual thought or ideological commitment in the Current West, it's quite evident that intelligence and knowledge alone won't save anyone's mind and soul. Intelligence is merely a tool and often caves to emotions. Intelligence seeks the truth only when directed towards it. When people with intelligence are instilled, especially at impressionable times in their lives, with strong emotions in relation to falsehoods or disingenuous narratives, the element of sheer passion overrides facts and reason. For example, just how did so many intelligent people come to believe in the divinity of Jesus for so many years? Because Christianity had such emotional, cultural, and spiritual power over them. Why did so many highly intelligent people become so swept up with Marxism/Communism? It wasn't only the conceit of partaking of an ideology that supposedly figured everything out and unified all relevant knowledge but the radical conviction that one was on the side of angels or historical justice. And yet, given the nobility and depth of Jesus' teachings and the power of Karl Marx's vision, those who wholeheartedly accepted the Christian Faith or Communist Destiny were not necessarily deforested of mind, at least not entirely so. Whatever harm the religion of Christianity or ideology of Communism may have done to the human psyche, it also planted new seeds that could grow into new trees of meaning, understanding, redemption, and/or justice. Neither was animated by nihilism, hedonism, or degeneracy.
But take a look at our world. We see women with green, purple, or pink hair. And, they are not merely silly teens trying to be 'different' but women who are middle-aged, even old. Why would an adult do that to her hair? If a 10 yr old girl did funny stuff to her hair to look like Cyndi Lauper or some anime figure, it might be 'cute'. But why would full-grown women, especially one with college degrees and professional responsibilities(and with family and children) go about doing stupid things to their hair? (Granted, such ladies tend to be 'cat ladies' than family women, but then, there are plenty of stupid mothers.) Why would so many people, parents and children, besmirch and sully their bodies with ugly tattoos? What goes on in their minds when they decide on such acts of folly? Don't they have a larger sense of life, i.e. what is 'cool' today maybe 'fool' tomorrow. And even if they are capable of only thinking of the Moment, why would anyone with sense believe that he or she looks better with body graffiti that are invariably ugly, vulgar, and trashy? Now, I can understand some primitive tribes where tattoos have some cultural significance. Or I can tolerate someone who's been to hell and back in war and got a tattoo to signal his camaraderie with his band of brothers. But what exactly is the meaning of tattoos to the fools who decide to splatter their bodies with in-erasable ugliness? While such is done to the body, it is decided by the mind, and one wonders why so many people in the West(and their cultural colonies) have fallen into the habit of harboring dumb thoughts and preferences that lead to disastrous results. (What tattoos are to skin, meth is to inner organs. Substitute kicks and highs for those with no sense of meaning.)
Obviously, both stupid 'cat ladies' with funny-colored hair and morons addicted to tattoos have mud-minds. They are putty in the hands of globalist Jews because their minds can be washed away so easily with the latest fads and fashions. Unlike status-anxious whore-politicians who just go along with the latest Official Line decided by the power(the Jews) out of opportunism, so many of so-called 'woke' community really seem to hysterically believe in the latest crusade or outrage with zero awareness that, only a few years or even moments ago, they hadn't a care or a clue on the subject or issue. Their ex-lax minds seem to slide and flow with whatever BS is cooked up by the Media Machine. In their formative years, their minds were not seeded and planted with meaningful trees providing them with a lifetime worth of meaning. Instead, PC uprooted what was nascent & normal, decent, and healthy in them and 'seeded' their mental soil with ideological salt(that prevents organic growth) and planted plastic saplings that has the semblance of trees but no means to spread its roots. ('Gay marriage' is to real marriage what a plastic tomato is to a real tomato. No, 'love is love' is not true love. Homo fecal-penetration is not equal in worth, meaning, and purpose to true sexuality that produced all the life in the world.) As such, the generations especially from the Boomers(and gone full-retard with the Millennials) have the kinds of minds that can be mud-slid away with ease. Nothing that is deep, meaningful, and true seems to stick with them. Their minds seem vulnerable & defenseless, so very gullible, and elope with the latest stupidity. (Today's 'liberals' might as well be called 'gulliberals'.) How else can one explain monstrosities such as 'gay marriage', dementia of Afrophilia(as if blacks, the most criminal race, is the most angelic race), ludicrousness of Jew-Worship(as if Zionists need protection from the countless Palestinians and Muslims Jews have terrorized and killed), and the clown-world notion that a man is a 'woman' simply because he feels like it.
What are the elements that hold a mind together and keep it resistant to the decadent, even degenerate, fads and fashions that now define so much of the 2 PC's, pop culture and political correctness? What allows for a healthy eco-system of the mind, a kind of psycho-system, one that can weather and survive the winds, rain, and hailstorms of the Corrupt and Venal Power? A strong sense of individuality is surely one but not in the libertarian sense that each individual should consider himself/herself as the center of the universe. No, every individual is part of a link, an inheritor of a legacy. After all, most of our lives are filled with things that we, as individuals, didn't create. While we are more than ants in a colony, we are like ants in that we are nothing all by oneself. We need individuality, but as individuals, we need to understand and appreciate that we are part of a family, culture, history, spirituality, and a sense of place. Even for the non-religious, certain spiritual notions can be beneficial in restraining excesses of hubris or hysteria. For the intellectuals and brainiacs with a know-it-all tendency, the concept of God can be like a contract among them that there is a power and truth beyond their capacity for discovery and understanding in their all-too-short lifetimes. The concept of God can also be beneficial to those who with heavy tendency toward sensualism: A contract among sensualists that there must be something more meaningful and deep than the pleasures of the flesh and tingles of sensory nerves. Without the concept of God or something equivalent, too many people are prone to self-worship, arrogance, mammon, or fervor of the moment(aka the Current Year). Global Warming Hysteria is one such example. While global warming caused by CO2 may indeed be a real problem, the sheer absolute certainty bordering on quasi-millenarianism among its proselytizers is truly a sight to behold. Instead of offering up better science and data with cool minds, they act as though they are 100% certain that UNLESS things go their way, it's End of the World for sure in a few decades. If anything is heating up real fast, it's their self-righteousness. While serious concern for the environment is laudable, especially as humans have despoiled the planet enough, the sheer arrogance of certitude bordering on megalomania(or 'megalogaia') among the save-the-worlders who spout the most hysterical and self-serving form of global-warming mania suggests that what is sadly lacking in their lives is a true sense of spirituality.
The forest of the mind needs real connection to family(even bordering on sentimentality as it is only within the family that one is allowed unabashed emotions that are essential to life), and this means having a man who knows what it is to be a father and a woman who knows what it is to be a mother. And this familial sense must be expansive as the concept of the nuclear family, though useful in the modern setting, tends to over-emphasize one's own family's separateness than relatedness to kinfolk. The nuclear family is convenient and desirable in that each family wants its free space and agency. Just like we, as individuals, want our private spaces, every family wants to mind its own business. Still, family bonds within and without are much richer when there is a larger sense of connection and communication among relatives including grandparents, uncles, aunts, cousins, nephews, and nieces. There need be ways of communication, meetings, gatherings, rituals, and remembrance that remind everyone that he or she isn't alone in the world or primarily part of some faddish subculture but part of a deep lineage. This used to be taken for granted in the past, but with so many children being only-child-ren, raised by single-parents(or even grandmothers or foster homes), and addicted to pop culture(and deracinated by PC), we can no longer take for granted the sense of belonging and obligations that come with Familial-Consciousness.
The forest of the mind also needs true spirituality. There are several true religions of great reach and depth. If one finds it impossible to literally believe in God or gods in the modern era(and this would include myself), we can still appreciate the old religions and mythologies for their imagination, searching, meaning, revelation, and lessons. One doesn't have to be Jewish, Christian, Muslim, Hindu, Buddhist, or Greco-paganist to draw inspiration from the faiths and fables that served as the visionary and spiritual bedrock of entire civilizations. While it is only natural to seek new meanings in our world of rapid change, one mustn't confuse the latest fad or fervor as worthy substitutes for the great religions and myths of the past. While it's possible that there will be new prophets and revelations in times to come, they most certainly won't be the products of the Current Power whose main(even sole) priority is to hog all the wealth and privilege for itself. Then, it's no wonder that the Power has been so hard at work in deforesting the minds of modern people so that their hearts-and-soul will wash away like mudslide under the barrage of globalist PC and Pop Culture.
The forest of the mind also needs real culture and true sensibility, just like the body needs real food with real nutrients. While we may enjoy candy, doughnuts, and ice-cream once a while as snack, we know we cannot survive on them for long. We need real food with proteins and vitamins. Similarly, a civilization with pop culture as its main culture is like someone who mainly gorges on junk food and candy as his/her main food. Why is our culture so sick(and sickly), fatuous, disgusting, imbecile, retarded, infantile, and/or excessive? It's due to the decline in sensibility, indeed to the point where even or especially the (so-called) experts can't tell what real culture is anymore. Consider the rise of Pop Art in the art world. Consider how superhero comic book movies have come to dominate the discourse about cinema. Consider how the biggest literary events are stuff like HARRY POTTER, HUNGER GAMES, TWILIGHT, FIFTY SHADES OF GREY, or some teen or teen-inspired fiction. A people who don't know real culture from junk culture have lost the forest of the mind. Their minds are like the hills of Haiti that's been stripped of trees and flows with mud whenever it rains.
Much more can be said on this subject, and this is only a start. But one thing for sure, we need an Arbor's Day for the mind. We must spread the seeds of truth, meaning, culture, and justice within our psyche. And by 'truth', I don't mean the Narrative foisted upon us by the capitalist-globalist Jewish-monopoly media. And by 'justice', I don't mean the official dogma of the Holy Three that elevates Jews, Homos, and Negroes as the only sacred groups whom all others must worship and serve. What is SJW(social justice warrior) or JJ(Justice Junkie) dogma really about? It's not about justice based on truth, facts, reason, and reciprocity but about hysteria based on idol-worshiping of certain groups(Jews, blacks, and homos) as the sole fountains of wisdom and holiness. It's a form of inverted supremacism that, while denouncing 'white supremacism', goes full blast in promoting Jews, blacks, and homos as more worthy than other groups. Just ask the Palestinians.
We must desalinize our minds of the poison salt of PC. We must remove the fake plastic plants of pop culture. And in their place, we must plant the trees of true wisdom, depth, meaning, passion, and connection. Otherwise, our minds will just be piles of mud that will not hold firm against the deluge of globalist pap and rot. And we need self-realization and self-actualization more than ever because even the institutions of true religions are now in the hands of globalist agents, witting or unwitting, who are aiding and abetting in the deforestation of the mind to turn all our minds into one collective mud-flood flowing into the nowhere land of mammonite idolatry of Jews, homos, and Negroes. Donald Trump may be useful as a wrecker of globalism, but he too is a depraved creature of depraved times, one where even the majority of so-called 'conservatives' are okay with 'gay marriage' and pander to the worship of the Holy Three. In the age of mud, we have 'gulliberals' and 'cuckservatives'. We need a garden of true liberals and true conservatives who need each other for both preservation and progress of a sane and sound society. And such a mind garden can only be created out of a true forest with real trees of knowledge and remembrance. In this age of degenerates, we need the re-emergence of the regenerates.
“What’s happening here? The state population is now about 13 percent Hispanic, but only 1 percent black. Part of the explanation is probably the Mormon Church’s century of institutional racism.”
Race-ism is best foundation for social-capitalism. Swedish model of social-capitalism was working just fine when Sweden was all Scandinavian... but then Diversity came along. (By Race-ism, I mean, "Ism means belief, so Race + Ism = Belief in the Reality of Race and Racial Differences; and the need for Racial Consciousness".)
In a way, Mormons became the way they are because they excluded others, but it was also because others excluded them. In this respect, they are like Jews who were excluded by others but also excluded others. Thus, Mormons developed a ‘ghetto’ mentality.
There are Two Meanings of Justice.
1. Legal Justice and Righting wrongs. So, if Bob does something wrong to John, Bob owes John compensation. It is about redress and punishment for violation of the law or social contract. This concept of justice is represented by "eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth" in the Bible. By its standards, if someone didn't do you any wrong, there was no injustice, and he owes you nothing.
2. Tribal Justice. A sense of shared survival and success. This concept of justice is found in the Exodus. Moses feels a sense of obligation to lead ALL Jews out of Egypt. He doesn't owe them anything as he hadn’t done them wrong(on a one-on-one basis) in his capacity as an individual, but as a Jew, he feels responsible for other Jews. This concept of justice says it is not enough for a person to be successful as an individual and care only about himself. He must belong to a community and work for the common good. Greek mythology is more individual-oriented. It's about the rare hero who rises above the rabble and demonstrates his superiority, like Perseus in the slaying of Medusa. To be sure, through his extraordinary feat, he saves others of his kind. And Theseus protects his community by slaying the Minotaur who gorged on human offerings. Still, the emphasis is on individual feat and personal glory. It is about how the hero stands APART from the rest. In contrast, the stories in the Bible emphasize how every individual's deeds relate to family and tribe. Communism, a secular form of Judeo-Christian worldview, tried to realize this Jewish-communal-sense-of-justice on a universal scale, but it was too grandiose and unwieldy. Just like a tower erected too high will collapse, so will a bridge built too long. The ideal of communal justice works best on the ethnic/tribal level and even on the national level IF the nation is racially & culturally homogeneous or reasonably so. This ideal that a people must all make-it-together and not leave others behind is found in the Zhang Yimou film NOT ONE LESS, a kind of 'no child left behind'. It only works within a shared racial community.
Mormon capitalism is bound to their brand of social-culturalism. But, it will fray if the Mormon community becomes overly diverse. Mormon theology is hardly profound stuff. What has made Mormons special has been (1) a sense of community based on shared race and history (2) Muslim-like emphasis on daily rites, some of which are sufficiently strict to prevent members from giving into excessive vice.
When it comes to family formation, Mormons have an intuitive sense that generating children amounts to a kind of future-socialism or bio-socialism. In a way, having children is 'socialist' in the sense that you have to share your earnings with others. Purely from an economic viewpoint, children are 'parasitic'. They do no work and leech off the wealth of parents. Parents must buy them food, spend time with them, clothe them, provide medical care, and etc. It is very taxing, economically and emotionally. So, why do it? Because it is a kind of future-socialism. Why is future-socialism rewarding in ways that paying taxes to provide benefits to total strangers isn't? Because there is a special bond of love & happiness between parents and children. Also, unlike faceless strangers who live off the tax revenues of others(via the confiscatory state) and show NO gratitude(and often demand MORE free stuff as a 'right'), children are happy and grateful for what they receive from their parents, even just an apple or orange. It's socialism of emotions than just of materials. (This is why prolonged welfare dependency is corrupting to both parents and children. When kids see their parents struggle to make ends meet, they feel appreciation and gratitude, even a bit of guilt because parents work so hard for the family. But when kids see their parents as mere leeches off the state, they feel no sense of obligation because it wasn’t the parents who provided for them. So, do they feel grateful to the state? No, because the state is faceless and abstract as far as they’re concerned. It is just a system to milk.) Also, if children are raised properly with sound nurturing of identity, culture, history, values, arts, and appreciation-for-nature, they carry on with the heritage even after their parents have passed away. Indeed, they see it as their obligation to do so. And in earlier times, they would have taken care of their parents. This was a big theme especially in traditional societies. Kids were seen as organic Social Security. Parents provide for their children, and later, the children-as-grownups provide for their parents-grown-old. So, family formation has always been a bio-cultural socialism into the future. Parents share their wealth with kids, and in turn, kids feel obligation to their parents and the culture they all sprung from.
This sense has weakened over the years because the state or industries came to provide for old people. Also, with the fading of identity and real culture, there is less of a sense of inheritance from parents and bequeathing to children except in monetary/material matters. If a people no longer believe in what they are in the racial-cultural-historical sense, they feel no need to pass the torch to keep it going. Today, most young people culturally identify with celebrities and what Chris Hedges calls the Empire of Illusion, a frivolous(but intensely charged) Fantasy World, than in the richness and depth of the line-of-my-people.
Orthodox Jews and Mormons still have strong identities, and they feel their cultures must be kept going through the ages as living inheritances and timeless inspirations. And the ONLY way to ensure that is to have children and teach them well. More than anything, one’s wealth, knowledge, experience, and genes must be SHARED with one’s children. That is the deepest and richest kind of socialism. Bio-Socialism.
It’s a truism that the Alt Right and related causes/movements constitute a reaction to Identity Politics of Jews, so-called ‘People of Color’, Homos, blacks, and even radical feminists. There is some truth to the assertion insofar as a group must uphold the banner of identity to have a seat at the bargaining table in the Diversity Sweepstakes. After all, if Power is increasingly about what-you-or-your-people-are-owed-because-of-your-interests-based-on-identity-politics, then it’s only right that every group must have an identity. It’s like, if the rule says, "You must have an identity card in order to purchase a car and drive", you won’t be able to drive unless you have a license. You will notice that everyone who is driving has an identity card that grants them the right to drive a vehicle. No card, no car. So, it’d be natural for you to go through the process of obtaining an identity card of your own so that you will be able to drive. Then, why should it be any different in politics and social competition. If the Current West says those groups with specific identities will be celebrated and favored in the Diversity Sweepstakes, then a people without an identity won’t amount to a plate of beans. They must always step aside and make way for those with identities that make them the favored of DIOS(Diversity Is Our Strength) Ideology. In the US, non-whites are allowed and even encouraged to have Identities. In contrast, whites are browbeaten into suppressing their Identity. Or, whiteness is invoked only as a Negative Identity that must be denigrated, impugned, mocked, shamed, and discredited. So, while most groups are made to feel Pride in Identity, whites are made to feel either numbness or shame. The only Pride allowed to whites is if they rise above Whiteness(as a toxicity) to be cleansed and redeemed by serving the Noble Identities of the Other, mainly Jews, Homos, and Negroes. (After all, Jews would be plenty pissed if whites who abandon their Pride of Identity decide to champion Palestinians and Iranians against Zionists as Evil Jewish WHITES.)
Because of the Name of the Game in our Age of Political Correctness and Diversity-Mongering, it’s been tempting for some white people to raise their own banner of White Identity and even White Nationalism. According to people like Jordan Peterson, it’s just a case of disgruntled white people picking up bad habits from PC and what Harold Bloom called the School of Resentment. (Jews praise Peterson for his criticism of White Identity, but of course, Jews are the biggest Identity Politicians in the world and insist that whites, upon rejecting their own identity, do all they can to support and promote Jewish Identity and Interests to the point of Jewish Supremacism.) But people like Jordan Peterson are overlooking a crucial difference between the rising tide of White Identity and the way Identity Politics is used by non-whites and the LGBTQP — P is for Pedophile — Community.
For starters, White Identity isn’t about White Innocence. Unlike the Identity Politics of other groups, White Identitarians don’t go around saying whites were always victimized, pure-as-snow, innately noble, and blameless. There is an understanding that the histories of all of humanity have been a brutal, violent, and destructive process. So, yes, white people were involved in wars, mayhem, conquest, oppression, and exploitation. Whites brutalized fellow whites and other races. But so did other races. Black African savages were conquerors, killers, and slavers too. Mongols were a fierce nomadic tribe that caused havoc in Asia, Near East, and Europe. American Indians and Aztecs where hardly salt-of-the-earth or star-children living in harmony with nature. Even as White Identitarians show appreciation for the awesome achievements of their forefathers, they are fully cognizant of the fact that history has been a brutal process and that much of human progress was the result of aggression and violence. It’s been noted by historians that the advancement of Western Europe owed to constant wars among kingdoms that prioritized innovation in weaponry and technology to stay ahead of rivals. It’s like Space Technology greatly benefited from the competition between the US and USSR to send the first man to the Moon. Thus, the Space Race happened parallel to the Arms Race. The very rocket that sent men to the Moon could have targeted a nation for nuclear destruction. (Furthermore, the best rocket scientists were the product of Nazi militarism.) History has been like that Sergio Leone movie THE GOOD, THE BAD, AND THE UGLY. The good, co-mingling with the bad and the ugly, wasn’t pure-as-snow either. So, except for extreme idiots on the White Right who revere Adolf Hitler and/or refuse to acknowledge the dark side of Western Imperialism(that discovered & united the World and unleashed new possibilities for all of mankind but also unloosed havoc and upheaval in every continent and even led to near-total extinctions of civilizations in the New World), there is an admittance and understanding among White Identitarians that (1) History has always been tragic and (2) White people did their share of killings and mayhem.
In contrast, most Peoples-of-Color, especially the blacks, pretend otherwise about their own bloody histories. Blacks act as if (1) they were totally great but white folks stole everything from them or made it impossible for Africa to have lots of Wakandas because European Imperialism got in the way of African genius and shi* and (2) they are innately noble & wonderful, therefore, everything that is wrong with blacks in the West or in Africa must be the fault of white folks. Worse, some blacks feel that they be so ‘cool’ and ‘badass’ that even the bad shi* they do is justified on account of awesome black folks done it. The logic goes, "Blacks be wonderful, so whatever they do be wonderful too." Blacks regard their own black bodies as Midas-like and shi*. It’s no wonder Ta-Nehisi Coates(aka The Nasty Coates or The Hissy Coates) be always yapping about Black Bodies. You see, black bodies got this talismanic soulfulness, so it was much worse to oppress Black Bodies than any other kinds of bodies since Black Bodies be magical and shi*. (According to GET OUT, White Liberals worship Black Bodies for their harder muscles and bigger dongs so much so that they are even willing to murder blacks to take over Black Bodies. So, if a Negro isn’t being chased by KKK who done hate him too much, he be chased by White Liberals who love his black body so much that they want to kill his ass and take over his black body.)
The jury is still out as to whether Jews are white or non-white. Jews find it useful to be white as they can launder their Jewish Privilege as WHITE PRIVILEGE and blame the White Community for having too much wealth and privilege(that are actually disproportionately held by Jews), but given the mindless vilification of whiteness over the years(not least due to Jewish control of academia and media), Jews are increasingly troubled by being thought of as WHITE. Many Jews are now tempted to emulate White Latin Americans, the descendants of Conquistadors, who masquerade as People-of-Color, benefit from Affirmative Action, and blame Gringo for all the history of White Oppression of the Other, conveniently forgetting that it was the Spanish and Portuguese who spearheaded the Conquest of the New World and the destruction of indigenous civilization of Aztec cannibals and Inca human-sacrificers. Anyway, whether Jews are white or non-white, they put on the biggest pure-as-snow & eternally-innocent act of all time. According to the Jewish Narrative, it is mental, moral, and spiritual sickness not to like, love, admire, respect, revere, and worship Jews. Goyim exist mainly to praise Jews, enrich Jews, protect Jews, fight for Jews, and massage Jewish ego(and suck the Portnonic puds of Jews). Apparently, the fact that most people throughout history didn’t treat Jews as god-king-saint-prophets is proof that humanity had been soul-sick with ‘antisemitism’ and must finally redeem itself by sucking up to Jews at every turn. What ethno-megalomania!
One thing for sure, except for diehard 14/88 Neo-Nazi moronic types, most of White Identitarianism is nothing like Jewish Identity Politics(or Identity Theology). White Identitatarians are not asking the World to revere or even respect whites. All they are saying is that Peoples of European Origin have traits, cultures, territories, and histories well-worth saving. They are NOT asking non-whites to serve white interests above their own interests. They are saying white people should primarily preserve their own identity and serve their own interests in their own domains just as non-white folks all over the world should do likewise for their own people, power, and culture. They are the exact opposite of White Supremacists who believe that the White Race(as the Master Race) should rule all the World and force non-whites to kiss White Butt. The position of White Identitarianism is, "You guys do your own thing, and we will do our own thing." Ironically, Jews, non-whites, and White Progs who condemn and denounce White Identitarianism as ‘white supremacism’ pursue an ideology that is predicated, upon closer inspection, on White Supremacist precepts. After all, whereas White Identitarians expect non-whites to be independent and capable of reforming, developing, and improving their own nations, the outlook of Jews, non-whites, and White Progs is the exact opposite. Their pro-Diversity and pro-Mass-Immigration(which is really Mass Invasion) argument is premised on the notion that non-whites must be with White Folks in White-Made nations to have a better life. So, don’t expect Somalians to fix their own problems in their own nation. They must be brought to Sweden and Minnesota(and Ohio and Maine) to have better lives. By themselves they are hopeless and helpless. So, even as Jews and Progs condemned Donald Trump for his ‘shithole nation’ remark, in their heart of hearts, they really do believe that certain non-white groups can’t do anything on their own. Those non-whites are like children who must be ‘rescued’ by Mass Immigration to the West where they can leech off White Wealth. Same attitude prevails in regard to certain Mexicans and Central Americans. Never ever expect those people to fix up their own nations. Their ONLY chance of a better life is to come to the US and partake of the civilization created by Whites. It’s just a variation of White Man’s Burden, the beneficent Master Race ideology of British Imperialism. The only difference between Then and Now is that White Man’s Burden(WMB) was once invoked to justify colonization of non-white lands by whites but is now subconsciously embraced to justify colonization of white lands by non-whites. You see, white folks must welcome such Diversity because those folks simply can’t have Nice Things unless they come to live in white nations. Therefore, the underlying principle of the Jews, non-whites, and Progs is actually closer to White Supremacist ideology than the core conviction of White Identitarianism is. The position of White Idenititarians — Whidens or Whidents? — is like that Bob Dylan song, "Most Likely You Go Your Way And I’ll Go Mine". Or "You Can Go Your Own Way" by Fleetwood Mac.
Even as Jews, non-whites, and White Progs defame whites as ‘toxic’ and wicked, they believe Jews and non-whites must always have access to White Worlds. If white race is infected with the toxicity of ‘white supremacism’, why do Jews and non-whites feel so dependent on whites and the White World? Why are Jews and non-whites so eager to follow whites wherever they go. If Earth were to blow up and if humans had to evacuate to a White Planet, Black Planet, Asian Planet, Brown Planet, Muslim Planet, or Hindu Planet, it's most likely that not only whites but non-whites will all try to head to the White Planet. Even when black or proggy celebrities threaten to leave the US because it is too ‘racist’ or ‘white supremacist’, their destination of choice is a nation even whiter than the US, usually Canada, Australia, or Germany. This attachment and dependence on Whiteness implies that Jews, non-whites, and White Progs really do believe Whites are superior. Indeed, whites are so superior that Jews have long preferred white nations over all others(despite all the complaints about 'antisemitism'). And non-whites prefer to leave behind thousands of yrs of history and culture in their own nations to resettle in white nations and live alongside white people, live under white laws & systems, and even have children with white folks. And the compassion of White Progs seems to be predicated on the notion that non-whites can only be rescued, taken care of, guided, and led by superior whites. Of course, PC ideology pretends that it’s all about Diversity-Equality-Inclusion, but if all the races are equal, why do non-whites prefer whites even over their own kind? And if Diversity is so great, why do non-whites run from Diverse nations in Latin America and North Africa to come to white-majority nations? Why do non-whites want to exclude themselves from their own nations and be included in white nations? The underlying assumption of Diversity is really the notion that Whites are the Best. Nobody-Does-It-Better than whites, and so, everyone, even in modern East Asia, wants to come to White Nations. ‘Diversity’ is really "I want to get away from my own inferior people and go live with superior whites." (Also, in order for Jewish Supremacism to be viable, Jews need the systemized support of the most capable race on Earth after the Jews, and that people happen to be whites. If Jews prize blacks most in sports, they prize whites most in management, bureaucracy, and leadership positions. The fact that Jews prize white talent above all others is sure sign that Jews don’t believe in the equality of the races despite their PC bullshit. Jews regard themselves as the most superior and want to be served-and-supported by the next-most-superior people who happen to be whites. This is why Jews obsess about shaming and taming White Identity. They want White Talent to serve Jewish Power than insist on its own power, White Power. Jewish Supremacism feeds on White Submissivism.)
At any rate, if the Identity Politics of Jews, non-whites, and Homos is essentially political, this isn’t true of the White Identitarian Movement. Granted, there are Real Identities in the School of Resentment — Jewish identity, Afro-black identity, Asian-Hindu Identity, and etc. are real identities with deep roots — , but the problem is a one-sided formulation whereby one’s own identity is whitewashed whereas everything about white people is tarred-and-feathered. And then, there are unstable and made-up identities in the School of Resentment, mainly because of the Rise of Gender Identity movement. While homosexuality is a Real Identity, it isn’t a stable identity because we never know from which couple the next homosexual child will be born. If a Greek man and a Greek woman produce a Greek child, a straight man and a straight woman can produce a homo child. And if a homo guy were to impregnate a homo woman, there’s no guarantee that the child will be homo; indeed, he or she is far more likely to be straight. Thus, there is a lack of continuity, certainty, and stability in homo identity. Still, homos are real enough.
In contrast, all this tranny business and related silliness have really mucked up Gender Identity Politics. Apparently, it’s Identity as Ideological Scrabble, a word game. Given that less than 0.5% of people are tranny, it shouldn’t matter that such folks cooked up 50 or more genders as a word game. The real problem is that this ultra-minority dysphoria has been promoted among impressionable children who are encouraged to gender-bend, not least with the enthused encouragement of their perverted teachers and wacky-proggy parents. So, the problem of Gender Dysphoria has spread like an epidemic among even naturally straight youths. Not only are boys told that if they feel a bit girlish, they might really be girls(and girls are told that if they feel a bit boyish, they might really be boys), but they are told it is a Great Sign worthy of celebration. (Proggy parents act as if giving birth to a homo or tranny kid is akin to Mary giving birth to Jesus. But then, Homomania was designed by Jews to be replacement faith for Christianity.) Just as people could be led to believe in witches and fairies, so many kids have been led to believe they may be something they are not. If you tell a roomful of kids that they may be afflicted with a certain condition based on vague symptoms, even kids without the condition could be made to believe that, gee whiz, maybe they have it too. Suppose you tell the kids about the symptoms of diabetes that, by the way, are NOT unique to diabetics. Then, many kids may be led to believe that maybe they too have diabetes because they have those symptoms like peeing a lot or feeling tired at times. Gender Fluid Identity works the same way. There are so many grey areas and vague suppositions that an impressionable child could easily be led to believe that, gee, maybe he’s really a girl or she’s really a boy... all the more so IF the authorities shower positive attention on the child who claims to be of the Other sex. This turned 21st century ideology in the Obama Era into a total farce. If Jews, blacks, and others(even homos to an extent) misused real identities for politics-of-resentment, trannies turned Identity Politics into a fantasy. Never mind misuse of identity; trannies just made up identities. And yet, globalists were fine with this because, as proponents of Mass Invasion, they waged War on All Real Identities(except Jewishness in Israel). The Idea was, If a man is a ‘woman’ if she says so, then anyone is anyone if he or she says so. Then, an African is an ‘Englishman’ or ‘Frenchman’ if he says so. An Afghani is a ‘Swede’ if he says so. The Proglob(proggy-globalists) went from misuse of real identities to mischief with false identities. Bruce Jenner claiming to be a ‘woman’ is really a form of Identity Theft.
At any rate, something like Jewish Identity or Black Identity need not belong to the School of Resentment. Jewish Identity is rich in history & culture and could be valued as such. And even though Alex Haley turned out to be a plagiarist and fraud, the idea behind ROOTS was a noble and moving one. And it is this kind of identity that White Identitarians are primarily interested in. Though all identities have no choice to be politicized in the Current Year, White Identitarianism is essentially cultural than political. In other words, it would be deemed necessary EVEN IF white people in the modern world weren’t challenged by Jewish globalism, Homomania, Black Rage, and non-white Mass Invasion. Even if white nations were demographically stable and secure, White Identitarians would stress the need for conscious identity because modernity alienates people from their racial roots, cultural heritage, historical consciousness, and mytho-legendary narratives. Even if whites were not demographically or territorially threatened by non-whites and Jews, White Identitarians would argue that the Modern conception of meaning, purpose, and existence is not enough to lend real meaning to birth, life, and death.
Indeed, White Identitarians would argue that white people(and non-whites in their nations) must now make a SPECIAL effort to retrieve/recover, revitalize, maintain, preserve, and hand down their sense of family, community, blood, culture, and history because it cannot be taken for granted in the modern world that has no use for anything but materialism, consumerism, individualism, hedonism, utilitarianism, and profiteering. Whatever value McDonalds or Walmart may have, it has no concern for where you came from, who you are, or what you will leave behind.
In a traditional community steeped in a particular culture, one doesn’t have to make an effort to have an identity or roots. One is always reminded of who he is, what his values are, what traditions & customs he must follow, and how he must behave. He is surrounded, indeed saturated, with culture. There is no need to be consciously cultural because he has no choice but to be habitually cultural because he’s surrounded by the trappings of his people’s culture from morning to night. If anything, a person in such an overtly cultural community must make a conscious effort to be free as a thinking individual. And the general trajectory of Western Civilization has been to break out of the confines of particular culture & community and gain independence & agency as free individuals. And this is why the West achieved so much more than other civilizations in which people were mired in strictly ordained decrees & demands of their fixed and particular culture. For example, Islamic and local tradition permeated every facet of life in the Arabian desert. And a samurai or peasant in pre-modern Japan conformed to the particular cultural norms and duties of his community. He had no individual freedom to say no and do his own thing. Indeed, he was so deeply enmeshed in his culture that he could hardly imagine an alternative.
In contrast, the West developed the concept of individual conscience, freedom, and initiative on the basis of reason, evidence, creativity/inspiration, and personal morality. Instead of merely conforming to the larger culture, the secret was to confirm one’s individuality, free will, and potential as a thinking & feeling being. And this development led to explosions in science, technology, enterprise, philosophy, and the arts. Therefore, instead of being submerged in a Permanent Culture(like Ancient Egyptians were over millennia), the West underwent accelerating changes in styles, expressions, ideas, values, and means/methods. And these developments eventually led to the Rise of Modernity. Even so, until relatively recently, Western Folks didn’t, at least for the most part, revile or reject their identity, culture, and history. Instead, they steadily evolved from one mode to another, changing profoundly but also remembering and appreciating the organic links between the present and the past. Progress meant building upon the past than rejection of the past.
Furthemore, in some ways Modernity necessitated a strengthening of cultural-and-national identity. In the old days of Kings and Aristocrats, most people were mere subjects, barely educated, often semi-literate(or even illiterate), and knew little of the world beyond their local community. Their lot in life was to obey and serve their lords and masters. But with the emergence of the Modern World, especially with the French Revolution and great transformations in Britain, the People began to matter. They were no longer mere subjects or servants but the citizens of the nation. As such, they needed to be educated and instilled with a sense of national purpose, cultural identity, and historical continuity. So, even though one facet of Modernity promoted individualism, another side of Modernity promoted unity of identity and purpose. And in the case of socialism and communism, there was a sense of solidarity and unity based on economic justice and working class dignity. Indeed, Karl Marx had written on the alienating effect of capitalism where the workers toil away in factories in which they have no direct stake; they are mere wage-slaves who might as well be cogs in the machine.
Anyway, even though we can all appreciate the freedom, individuality, and sense-of-agency made possible by modernity, we must also recognize that there is a serious problem of meaning-of-existence in the 21st century, in many ways far more troubling time than the earlier century. At the very least, even through most of the 20th century, the atomizing and deracinating(albeit personally liberating) aspects of Modernity were balanced by the unifying influence of nationalism. Frenchmen and the British became freer and more individualistic but also prouder and more unified as members of a nation-based civilization. For most of the 20th century, a Frenchman knew what was or wasn’t a real Frenchman, and a Briton knew what was or wasn’t a real Briton. Japanese had a clear sense of who was Japanese and who wasn’t. On the one hand, modernization infused greater individualism among the Japanese. But the effect of nationalism as a modern organizing principle was to instill all Japanese with a sense of shared blood and history. Prior to modernization, a Japanese peasant may have mainly identified as human property to his samurai lord. His cultural consciousness would have been local and village-centered. He was Japanese but had a weak sense of being part of the Japanese nation, history, and civilization. But modernity, in freeing the masses from their traditional stations in life(in which their forbears were bound to over many generations), needed to raise national consciousness in order to lend the uprooted and displaced masses a new sense of belonging and purpose. It was a huge challenge for someone to make the adjustment from a local agricultural community to a mobile industrial economy. Nationalism was the remedy for alienation resulting from one’s ‘exile’ from one’s local community.
But that balance of nationalism and individualism has been lost with the rise of globalism. Some may argue that nationalism was discredited because of WWI, Nazism, and WWII, but this is total nonsense. WWI was the result of clash of empires. Had the problems been resolved on the local-national level, there never would have been the Great War. Also, Nazism went truly wrong when its emphasis went from National to Imperialist. Also, it was nationalism that was the main motivator against both German and Japanese imperialism. Polish and French Resistance were nationalist. Russians fought for the Motherland. Chinese resisted Japanese aggression for national preservation. And after WWII, the Third World struggles were all nationalist and anti-imperialist. And it was nationalist pressures that made the USSR give up on empire. The Soviets knew their imperialism over Eastern Bloc nations was unpopular among the native folks. Soviets got away with crushing the nationalism of Hungarians in 1956 and Czechs in 1968 but grew increasingly anxious about maintaining hegemony via force of arms. Poland could have exploded in the 1980s, and the Soviets didn’t send in tanks only because the Polish communists managed to clamp down(mainly to avoid full-scale Soviet invasion). When the Soviet Union broke apart, the world breathed a sigh of relief and welcomed the emergence of newly liberated nations. So, the main theme of the 20th century was as follows: Universal Nationalism as the primary force of freedom and dignity against Imperialism.
But then, Jews took power in the West(especially following the end of the Cold War) and rewrote history to make Nationalism the main culprit of the 20th century. As the new rulers of the US(and the EU and even Russia for awhile in the 1990s), Jews became addicted to supremacist hegemonic neo-imperialism and strove to undermine all nationalisms(as obstacles to the Empire of Judea or EOJ). Jews even promoted Homomania as the New Globalist Ideology and even crusading neo-religion. Thus, the West(and other nations emulating the West) grew weaker in national, cultural, and historical themes. No longer was there nationalist consciousness & solidarity to counter-balance the individualism and atomization of modernity. In time, Pop Culture became the main culture. History was simplified to vilify whites and paralyze them with ‘white guilt’(to make them subservient to the Noble Victim Peoples such as Jews, Negroes, and Homos, aka the Holy Three). White Submissivism is necessary to serve Jewish Supremacism. Religion was distorted into Zionist warmongering among Evangelicals or Homo-worship among Mainline churches. National identity kept eroding with Mass Immigration, the effect of which was really Mass Invasion or Demographic Imperialism by the Other. In time, Parasitism was the New Normal while Classic Patriotism was vilified as ‘far right’ and ‘hateful’. So, an illegal invader is a ‘dreamer’ in the US while a gung-ho patriot is a ‘populist deplorable neo-nazi far-right hater’. So, a Briton who wants to keep Britain British is a deranged ‘hater’ and ‘racist’ whereas newcomers from Africa or Pakistan WITH ZERO ROOTS in the U.K. are welcomed as wonderful New Britons. When Parasitism is the New Patriotism, you know something is terribly wrong. Meanwhile, the globalists assure everyone that all will be fine because of... More Restaurants, More Exoticism, More Sex-with-the-Other, and More Vibrancy.
This is why white people(or any other people) must now make a conscious effort to cultivate, reinforce, and preserve their sense of identity, roots, and history. A Briton living in the U.K. in the 1930s needed not have made such a conscious effort. From a young age, at school and church, in the home, and serving in the military, he was educated, indoctrinated, conditioned, and encouraged to identify as British, share in British glory and pride, and defend British might, territory, and honor. He didn’t have to make a conscious effort as all the institutions, big and small, worked in concert to imbue him with national identity, spiritual sense, and ethics-manners-honor thought to be particular to British folks. But now, all such are gone. If anything, the Jewish-Homo-Cuck-dominated institutions & industries of media, academia, finance, entertainment, sports, and the state all conspire to tell British kids that Africans-and-Muslims-are-the-real-Britons-because-UK-has-always-been-a-nation-of-immigrants, Homos-and-Trannies-are-holy-and-the-Christian-church-exists-primarily-to-bless-fruitkins-and-other-deviants, Jungle-Fever-and-the-Afro-Colonization-of-White-Wombs-are-the-greatest-thing, White-males-must-cuck-out-and-become-wussy-servants-of-Jews-Blacks-Muslims-and-Homos, and Pop-Culture-is-the-main-culture. When this is the reality in the U.K. and in the US, people are no longer possessed of meaningful identity, culture, or history. They must now find it on their own. They must ‘home-school’ themselves on what they are really about. The Jewish globo-supremacists who control the US use all their means to persuade white Britons and white Americans that their nations were always ‘nations of immigrants’, always about ‘universal values’(though one must always, for some odd reason, favor Jews over all others), and always harmed most by ‘racism’ that prevented sufficient Diversity that will really do wonders for UK and US. It’s all a crazy lie.
In fact, Race-ism was one of the best, soundest, and most essential components of what made UK and US great and outstanding in the past. Race-ism assured racial integrity, unity, continuity, and solidarity. A people who drop their race-ism either become confused/alienated or ‘cucked’ to serving other peoples who continue to cling to their identity. Is it any wonder that whites, who’ve been pressured to lose their own identity, are now so servile to the powerful identities and interests of Jews, blacks, and homos?
Identity and what might be called ‘culturality’ is like Morality. When and Where they are not remembered, reinforced, and preserved by institutions and community-at-large, they must be salvaged and secured by individuals themselves. It’s like, if there are no schools to teach you, you must educate yourself. If there are no established churches or temples to preach the faith, you must do so on your own. In a community with a strong sense of right-and-wrong, one doesn’t have to be consciously moral. In such a community, moral values are written into the codes of everyday life and being. If you’re a member of the Amish community, you are reminded by everyone and everything what it means to be Amish in identity and values. But in the modern world of individuals and decadent/deracinated elites(who offer no guidance, leadership, and protection), every person must consciously think of right and wrong because he is surrounded by freedom and choice than by moral instruction and social pressures. (Granted, PC does exert much pressure on modern people, but it’s not about morality but about Power by supremacy-of-sanctimony. PC tells us to unquestioningly defer to Jews, Homos, and blacks. But morality is NOT about blind obedience to certain groups deemed divine. Also, true morality must apply to everyone. PC can’t be truly moral because it blames whites even when they are innocent and exonerates Jews, Homos, and blacks even when they are clearly wrong or problematic. Consider the Starbucks Negroes who were treated as saintly victims by the company and the media even though they violated Starbucks' policy... that, by the way, was soon altered to appease the black community. If blacks want to occupy a table without buying anything, it must be justifiable, even inspiring and noble, because they are black; therefore, the company must now allow ALL peoples to hang out at Starbucks without purchasing anything.) Just like one must be consciously moralist in a world devoid of clear moral instructions, guidance, and pressure, one must be consciously culturalist in a world that no longer provides clear guidance and meaning in the identity, culture, and history of a people. And this is where White Identitarianism is different from mere Identity Politics so common among the Progs. With Progs and their allies, Identity is simple. It comes down to feeling good-and-noble if one is Jewish, Homo, or black. If one is non-white but not one of the Holy Three, he or she must latch onto one or all of the Holy Three to gain Pokemon points. At the very least, non-whites of all stripes are at least not scapegoated for all the problems of the world. That ‘honor’ is reserved for the Wicked Whites who, unless they suck up to Jews-Homos-Negroes, are defamed as ‘far right’, ‘neo-nazi’, or ‘white supremacist’. So, that is Proggy Identity Politics in a nutshell. It’s so easy. Feel good and noble if you’re of the Holy Three or non-white. Feel bad and bow your head in shame if you’re white, especially straight white male. It’s really hardly more sophisticated than a game of Tag, ‘You got the cooties’, or Pin-the-Donkey(or Honkey as the case may be). Jews got the looties, homos got the tooties, blacks got the booties, and whites got the cooties.
In contrast, notwithstanding the political dimensions of White Identitarianism, it is essentially a cultural project of ‘home-schooling’ oneself of his or her true origins, history, and culture... and, based on those factors, forging a sense of destiny for one’s own people independent of the globalist project of subverting and destroying all nations and cultures(except for Israel that gets Passover privileges). In a world where white kids are raised on trash & degenerate Pop Culture as the Main Culture and on vapid & shallow Political Correctness as the Main Credo, there is a need for white individuals to think consciously, critically, and seriously of what it means to be part of a Real Folk, Real Culture, Real History, and Real Tradition. If someone who does the cooking serves you healthy and balanced meals, you don’t have to think consciously about nutrition. It’s all done for you. You merely need to arrive on time and enjoy the meals. But if there’s no one to cook for you OR if the cook just serves you sugary & greasy junk food, you need to learn to cook for yourself and gain personal awareness of what real nutrition and healthy eating are. And the conscious will of ‘preparing our own meals’ is at the core of White Identitarianism. When the globalists just feed white people junk and garbage that lead to diabetes and cancer of mind, body, and soul, it is about time white people learn to ‘home-school’ and ‘home-cook’ their own servings of culture, history, and identity.
