"White Silence Is Violence" — Yes, White Silence about Jewish Supremacism IS Violence against Palestinians and Victims of Zionist Imperialism — White Silence about Black Criminality is Violence against Truth and Rule of Law

There is a saying among BLM types: White Silence is Violence

Well, I agree but not in the way that BLM scumbags and their allies & enablers mean it. The motto is true in the sense that whites have been craven, feckless, cowardly, timid, and mute in face of rising evil and intensifying madness driven by Jewish Madness. In a way, we can understand why people choose to remain silent, choose to be cowards. People are naturally fearful, and most dare not stick their necks out. After all, how many victims of Josef Stalin & Jewish Bolshevik henchmen dared to voice their disgust with the system? How many Jews and other victims of Nazi Germany spoke out before SS henchmen with guns? How many American POWs spoke out against the Japanese captors in World War II? How many Japanese in America spoke out against dispossession and 'internment'?
So, human history is rife with those who remained silent in face of evil, oppression, or injustice. Of course, there is another kind of silence. It is when, despite you and your kind not being targeted by the Power, there is ample evidence of other groups being wronged; but you and your kind mostly remain silent. Germans have been accused of not speaking out against Adolf Hitler, and too many Russians and Chinese just went along with the madness of Stalinism and Maoism. And most Americans are silent about the evils of their government AS LONG AS it doesn't directly affect their lives. Such people are either tacitly approving of the oppression against the targeted groups OR fearful that speaking up may jeopardize their social status, livelihoods, or even lives. Edward Snowden blew the whistle, and look where he is now. And Julian Assange is facing serious time in prison.

According to Jewish-promoted BLM, white people are 'violent' for remaining silent about the 'systemic racism' of 'white supremacism'(that is supposedly interwoven through every fabric of society) that disproportionately targets, oppresses, and even murders so many innocent black lives. By not speaking out against evil, they are essentially tolerating its continuance. Even if you aren't directly involved in the oppression, you are doing nothing to stop it, and therefore, you too are culpable as observers who've done nothing. If you see a man being abused and killed but just go about your daily business and seek out distractions(as entertainment), you are not much better than the oppressors/murderers. If you see someone being murdered outside your window, shouldn't you call the cops than just keep watching TV? Even if you're not guilty of the murder, aren't you guilty of indifference and lack of caring?

All true, but totally untrue within the context of American Reality. If any group is silent in the face of violence, it is the blacks. Blacks are the main killers of blacks, but the 'stitches for snitches' fear-mongering in the black community has made it difficult for many blacks to come forward and serve as witnesses. Also, the intense street tribalism of blacks means that many blacks who know the killer will remain silent out of thug-loyalty. Furthermore, despite the odd black person who is wrongfully killed by the police, the police is the best protection against black-on-black murder. Indeed, the reason why blacks call the police the most is because they're attacked by other blacks. Of course, they hate the police when OTHER blacks call the cops on them when THEY do the violence. When blacks are attacked by other blacks, they are the first to call the police for protection. But when they attack other blacks, the first thing they do is blame the cops.
Now, as the proper thing to do when you see someone being murdered is to call the police, it would be most stupid to denounce the police as the main problem when, if anything, it is the only effective force against so much black-on-black violence in black areas. This is all common sense and simple facts, but the rise of PC mentality under Jewish Supremacism and White Cuckery has led to a browbeaten population that is afraid to speak the truth.

So, if any silence is the real violence, it is the silence of Jews, blacks, whites, and others that refuses to speak the obvious truth about black problems. The obvious truth is blacks commit more crime due to Endemic Race-ism(as opposed to 'systemic racism'), i.e. black genetics made them more inclined toward aggression, impulsiveness, and violence. Also, the fact that blacks are more muscular and tougher in a non-black majority society has imbued them with alpha thug pride, emboldening their viciousness. This is an obvious truth, but no one dares say it out of fear of PC and stupid accusations of 'racism' OR out of ignorance under PC mind-control.
Given the truth of higher natural propensity to violence among blacks(especially within the context of white majority society in which blacks feel as superior thugs and studs over whites), the logical conclusion would be that blacks need to be more mindful of their aggressive nature, more critical of the loutishness of fellow blacks, and more accepting of tough measures to control crime in their communities. Then, there could be more law-and-order and more reflection among blacks, and that will reduce violence and death in black communities. But no one dares speak this obvious truth. They opt for silence out of fear of PC. And it is precisely this kind of silence that has led to MORE DEAD blacks(along with non-blacks as well). Why is it that every time society bends the knee to BLM demands, MORE BLACKS end up being killed and more neighborhoods end up going to pot? Whether in the late 60s through the early 90s, the final yrs of the Obama Presidency, or since the advent of BLM riots in 2020, the number of dead blacks has increased. And with less policing, black aggression has spiraled out of control, and there have been many more victims of black thuggery and savagery.

So, it is true. Silence is Violence. But not in the way that BLM idiots, Jewish Supremacists, and White Cuck morons mean it. Silence is Violence because the forced/accepted silence about black problems has led to a total mis-diagnosis of racial problems. It's like treating indigestion with chemotherapy. But then, as with the Covid-19 hysteria, mis-diagnosing national/world problems is what the Globalist Elite Power is all about. The Power doesn't care about the truth, justice, or answers. It only cares about its own power, more of it. And as the power is held by Jewish Supremacists, it will push for any kind of PC, no matter how false, in order to ensure that whites will be paralyzed with 'white guilt', thereby remaining beholden to the Other led by Jews. Jewish Supremacist Power fears nothing more than White Liberation that finally says NO to Jewish Evil.

There are other ways in which White Silence is Violence. Why were Jews able to destroy Palestine and go on oppressing & dehumanizing the Palestinian people since the days of Nakba? Because there has been two kinds of white voices on the matter. The loud voice that totally cheered on Zionist imperialism against Palestinians and the silent voice that knew of the injustice but remained mum out of fear of Jewish Power & American Zio-mania OR out of toady-like admiration of Jewish Power, Wealth, and Achievements. But there were many whites who remained silent out of profound sympathy for Jews in the aftermath of WWII and Shoah. They felt white folks had no right to pass judgement on Jews who'd been victimized so horribly the by West. But in remaining silent, they de facto consented to Jewish manipulation of US foreign policy to favor the Zionist destruction of Palestine. So, there is a clear case of White Silence is Violence.

But it wasn't just the whites but other Americans too. Most blacks remained silent about all the US wars against foreign nations. Most blacks said NOTHING about what Zionists did to Palestinians. Most blacks were too busy watching TV or listening to rap or twerking. And their so-called leaders were too beholden to Jewish Money to speak out against Jewish Power. But the same goes for browns and yellows. Most browns don't care about US foreign policy. Many join the US military and invade other nations at the behest of Jews. And status-oriented yellows only care about saying whatever is 'proper' so as to rise up the ladder and be accepted by the Power. Sadly, this is even true of many Arabs and Muslims in America. So, all their SILENCE has essentially amounted to an assent to US foreign policy steered by evil Jewish Supremacism. Indeed, the number of blacks(most of them thugs) killed by US police is nothing compared to the number of Arabs, Muslims, and others around the world destroyed by US military, US financial terrorism, and US sanctions. But where is the Voice? Where is the Talk? Where are the Conversations?
Indeed, contrary to PC 'woke' accusations, plenty of whites are always talking about blacks and blackity-blackness. Jews, blacks, whites, and even browns/yellows are always talking about problems faced by blacks. Blacks like Jussie Smollet can lie. Blacks can pull off endless hate hoaxes. Blacks can sit at Starbucks without paying, but they are always the 'victims'. Blacks misbehave the most in school and get suspended, but they are portrayed as poor victims of 'racism'. The problem in the US is not white silence about blacks but White Bullshit about blacks. It's about White Dogma about blacks. White dogma, mantra, and bullshit about blacks feed on black megalomania and mis-diagnose problems by blaming whites and 'systemic racism' for black bad behavior, largely driven by the endemic race-ism of genetic product of evolution. If indeed whites are silent about anything, it certainly isn't about blacks.

Whites are silent about black violence against whites and non-blacks. How many whites get worked up over black-on-white, black-on-brown, and black-on-yellow violence? How many whites get worked up over blacks attacking Muslims and Hindus? There is talk of black-on-black violence on occasion but with emphasis on black victim-hood than black criminality. So, if a black thug kills a black kid, there is so much hand-wringing and tear-jerking about the black kid but hardly any word about the black thug who killed him. But usually, the talk is about whites attacking blacks when, in fact, the truth is the other way around. Black-on-white violence is the reality of America. But as Jews control the media, such facts are often suppressed. And as Jews control academia, they mold elite minds into believing that only 'racists' blame blacks for anything. And as Hollywood functions as the new vatican, the new 'spiritual' center of the world, all those white kids who grew up on Magic Negro tropes worship the Mountain-Sized Negro who loves a little white mouse in THE GREEN MILE along with MLK and Mandela.
In a way, people's perceptions change when dealing with gods. In the Bible, it is a sin when man kills man. But when God kills countless people, it's 'justice' because God is holy and fit to judge wicked mankind. And in pagan cultures, gods must be appeased even when they act amoral because they're so great and above the rules of mankind. In a way, white attitude toward blacks is a blend of biblicalism and paganism. On the one hand, blacks are seen as the people of MLK and Mandela, who are now holier than god and jesus. Blacks, as spiritual icons, can judge the rest of humanity, especially whites, the most 'racist' race stained with the 'original sin of slavery'. So, black violence is always justified, like God smiting the wicked in the Bible. So, whatever blacks do is filtered through this biblicalism. But as blacks are also top dogs of sports, sex culture, and thug-rap-music, white people are enamored with blacks as akin to pagan demigods who, being so badass and cool, are above the lame rules that apply to the rest of humanity. And in cult of Fentanyl Floyd, there is a combo of both biblicalism and paganism. He is spoken of as an angel and saint. But there is the other side of Floyd, the porn actor, drug dealer, and outlaw who "did it my way, sheeeeeeiiiit."
One thing for sure, there is no white silence about blacks. There are endless news articles about Emmitt Till and blackity-blackness. There are endless movies and TV shows about blacks and more blacks. There is MLK day, black history month, and black rappers revered as poets and prophets. Blacks appear all over TV news. Academia is filled with so much talk of black this, black that, and all the Narrative must conform to the notion of blacks as special, especially tragic, especially magic, exceptionally wise, and always oppressed. (Black megalomania parallels Jewish megalomania. There has been so much talk of Jewish victim-hood while hardly any official mention of Slavic victim-hood under Jewish Bolsheviks and Jewish gangster-globalists. No politician in the US speaks for Palestinians and about Nakba while all politicians are always praising Jews and Zion to high heaven. And yet, ADL and other Jewish organizations are always bitching that NOT ENOUGH is said about the Holocaust and 'antisemitism'.) Even when the problems are obviously caused by blacks, the PC logic goes into warp mode to somehow connect blacks stupidity and murderous-ness to 'systemic racism' or 'white racism'(or 'white fragility', and etc). And this is all a fool's game because, even as PC excoriates 'white fragility', it perpetuates it because whites are always put on the moral defensive. PC says it is sick of 'white silence' and wants whites to speak honestly about problems, but that is exactly what PC doesn't want. After all, if all of us can speak openly and honestly, many will point out racial differences, black stupidity, and black violence. Such honest talk won't do because it will destroy the culture of ignorance and conformity that makes PC possible. PC reacts to truth like bacteria reacts to oxygen. PC's idea of truth is like communist notion of freedom. 'Our way or the highway'. Just like communists told you how to be 'free', PC tells you what you must believe as 'true'.

Still, there is much truth in the notion of 'white silence is violence'. White Silence about Jewish Supremacism has led to Jewish Evils all around the world. As long as whites don't speak out against Jewish Power, it will go on using the US to support Israel's diabolical policies against Palestinians, Syrians, Iranians, and etc. If white people had spoken truth to Jewish Power, so many Arab and Muslim lives could have been spared in the Middle East. Also, prevention of wars and chaos would not have led to the massive 'refugee' crisis that engulfed parts of Europe and caused so many problems.

It is white silence about Jewish Power and its manipulation of blacks that has led to so much victimization of whites and non-blacks. If whites had been loud and clear about black-on-white violence, more would have been done to reduce it, thereby saving many white lives. But even as so many whites were attacked by blacks, most whites remained silent out of fear of being called 'racist' by the Jewish-run media and its cucky-wuck minions.
It is white silence about Jewish Supremacist Evil that led to a 'new cold war' with Russia, thereby endangering both nations with possibility of conflict, even all-out war. The truth is that nearly all of anti-Russia hysteria is driven by Jewish Supremacists who are bitter that they failed to take over Russia like they did with US and EU. Jewish Globalists hate the idea of an independent Russia that says NO to Jewish Globalist Hegemony and fear that other whites around the world might take the cue from the Great Bear. And so, there has been nonstop vilification campaign against Russia, but there's been total silence among most whites regarding this matter. Even those who are more sympathetic to Russia remain silent about the Jewish role in the 'new cold war'. Such white silence indeed breeds the unrelenting violence of the Jewish Supremacist worldview.

So, something must be done about the problem of 'white silence is violence'. It is about time whites got some courage, broke the vow of silence, and spoke truth to Jewish Supremacist Power. Whites need to push for a De-ZioNazification Campaign. Jewish Power must be exposed for its evils, and White Liberation must pledge to no longer serve and enable the evil and murderous(even genocidal) agendas of Zionic perfidy. White Soldiers must speak out and say, "We will NOT fight Wars for Israel." No more white silence before the power of Jewish Supremacism. White Voice is Choice. And choice means the hope of breaking break free from the nagging, demanding, threatening, and insulting biliousness of Jewish Supremacism that regards whites not as fellow humans but as attack dogs, horses, cattle, and Janissary for the Empire of Judea. Go get some paint and spread the message PALESTINIAN LIVES MATTER on the streets of New York. PLM.

NEW YORK FALLS APART AS POLICE CHIEF AND ENTIRE COMMAND QUIT, COPS WATCH BLM LOOT SNEAKERS


AVOID HONEY TRAPS by Ramzpaul

Police Reform is as Useless as Soldier Reform — We need ELITE REFORM as the Elites gave orders to the Police to wage War on Black Crime and Thuggery — Jungle Faith is downstream from Jungle Fever

All this talk of Police Reform is total nonsense. It's like discussing Soldiers Reform. While cops and soldiers can be trained and pressured to act more professional, most of what they do is following orders from ABOVE. In other words, even if soldiers commit no 'war crimes' or 'atrocities', they will invade, bomb, mass-kill, and destroy entire nations at the behest of their superiors who, in turn, take orders from the Deep State. (Democracy is about politicians doing the bidding of oligarchs while pretending to represent the people. After all, politicians are vetted and funded by oligarchs than arise from the people.) Same with the police. Even if all cops were 100% professional(or composed of foolproof robots) and didn't commit acts of police brutality, problems will arise from the fact that they're doing the bidding of the elites and the propertied class. (The case of Michael Brown was a classic example of this. It turns out the cop acted 100% professionally, but the ghastly Negro died and this upset a lot of blacks and all those do-goody naive whites who get their ideas of blacks from movies like GREEN MILE and TO KILL A MOCKINGBIRD.) The elites want safe streets and safe neighborhoods. That means using the police to get tough on criminal elements. Many such offenders are black. Also, blacks call the police to protect themselves from other blacks. So, tensions between blacks and police will be a fact of life in the US. And no police reform can fix this problem that mainly arises from black genetics, a natural propensity toward thuggery. After all, it's far more likely George Fentanyl Floyd died of drug overdose than police abuse. Police exists because the elites and law-abiding people want protection. Also, even the criminal class often rely on the police to protect them from other criminals. Even the mother of a gang-banger will call the cops if her gang-banger son is gunned down by other gang-bangers.

So, if tensions between the police and blacks are a problem, then it makes no sense to speak of 'police reform'. Policemen, just like soldiers, follow orders and do as told. Did the US military go into Iraq or drop bombs on Libya because soldiers went rogue? No, the soldiers did as ordered by higher-ups who, in turn, took orders from politicians who are in the pockets of Jewish oligarchs. The worst crime of the Iraq War was not Abu Grahib, bad as it was. The far bigger crime was that the US military was made to invade another nation on false pretext. And this decision was cooked up at the top by Jewish Neocons, Liberal Zionists, and their white cuck allies. Even if Abu Grahib and other atrocities hadn't happened and even if every US soldier had acted totally professionally, they still would have invaded another nation on bogus propaganda. And in doing so, US soldiers would have had to drop tons of bombs and shoot a lot of people just the same.

In the aftermath of the Iraq Debacle, do we talk of Soldier Reform? No, soldiers didn't make the decision. The orders came from the politicians owned by oligarchs. So, if there needs to be reform in US foreign policy, it must be at the top. Soldiers always do as they're told. When they're told to drop bombs to kill countless people, they do so. And when US soldiers were told to stand down when orgies of looting broke out all across Baghdad, they did as ordered and did nothing as the whole city was stripped clean. The responsibility belongs at the top. Sadly, there was no political reform after Iraq. Barack Obama spoke of a new foreign policy but, as just another puppet of Jews, expanded the mayhem even further, even inflaming Ukraine, Libya, Syria, and Yemen. And Donald Trump promised a new chapter but just became another stooge of the Deep State. US troops are still illegally occupying Syria and continuing with the 'Afghan War' which is now just plain and simple occupation. In all this, US soldiers just did as told. No amount of Soldier Reform can fix the problem of US foreign policy that is decided at the top. US soldiers do not, of their own volition, decide to keep occupying Okinawa, South Korea, European nations, Central Asia, and much of Middle East. US soldiers are there under the orders of politicians who do the bidding of the Deep State and Military-Industrial Complex. But notice that even so-called 'leftist' Democrats are totally for more money for Pentagon. Both parties hail the US military as heroes when, in fact, it kills countless more innocent victims than the US police does. Also, if the role of police is law and order, the role of US military is neo-imperialism and lawless disorder around the world for the sake of Jewish Power and Israel. What is called "US foreign policy" or "American Interests" are all about "Is it great for Jewish supremacists?" After all, if US had a neutral and fair policy toward all the world, it would not favor Zionist tyrants over Palestinian victims.

All this talk of 'police reform' is a dirty ploy of shifting the blame on the cops(who did as ordered) away from the politicians, elites, and affluent folks who valued a police force that would effectively deal with black crime, violence, and thuggery. Crime is more a racial than economic thing as plenty of poor whites and browns aren't big on crime. While poor people tend to commit more crime than rich people, the out-of-control pathology of crime is mostly a black phenomenon in the US, and this has little to do with history and mostly to do with biology, i.e. blacks evolved to be warriors, hunters, and thugs in hot savage Africa where hippos wanted to stomp them to death and hyenas wanted to tear them apart. African beasts were the first to lament, "There goes the neighborhood".

So, if 'good' and 'anti-racist' Americans are really troubled by the conflict between the police and blacks, what they should call for is POLITICIAN REFORM, ELITE REFORM, and JEWISH POWER REFORM. The rich and the powerful gave orders and made demands on the police to get tougher on blacks. The proof that the police only follows orders can be seen in how it does little to arrest Antifa in cities like Portland and NY while working with Antifa against white nationalists at Charlottesville. Why do the police leave BLM and Antifa vandals alone while arresting the St. Louis couple that only protected their own private property? Why do the police allow Antifa and BLM thugs to paint 'Black Lives Matter' all over but arrest people for painting over such signs? Again, the police has no agency. It does as told. If the US were communist and if cops were ordered to arrest capitalists, cops will do just that. If the US were antisemitic and if cops were ordered to arrest all Jews, they'll do just that. Cops are like dogs, just like soldiers. They look powerful because they got guns and clubs, but they must do as told. If they're ordered to stand down amidst Antifa violence, they will do just that. If they're ordered to arrest Proud Boys who only defended themselves from Antifa thugs, they'll do that.

When all these Jewish elites and mayors call for Police Reform, they are deflecting blame from themselves and scapegoating another. It's like the corporate sharks in Akira Kurosawa's BAD SLEEP WELL who use underlings as sacrificial scapegoats while they themselves remain unscathed. In all these blue cities, it was the affluent class and Jewish Power(and homo gentrifiers) who demanded tougher policing to deal with black crime and thuggery. And they were happy to see the crime rates go down. It was Bill Clinton who ordered cops to arrest more blacks. And the courts convicted more blacks. Cops had no say in this. Cops were mere cogs in the system. But the Power never wants any blame. They just blame the police and call for 'police reform' when blacks explode in rage. Or, even worse, the Power encouraged black rage explosion this time around to undermine Trump's presidency and use BLM/Antifa rage as fuel for yet another Maidan-like color revolution. (But as Trump supported such in Venezuela, he too is a scumbag.)

Though there are surely rogue cops, the main problem in the US is that TOO MANY BLACKS act like thugs, and the affluent class(and everyone else) relies on the police to keep black thuggery under control. The police exists because people who fear for their lives and value their private property demand it. And the police ends up in contentious encounters with blacks because blacks are the main thugs. What was Stop-and-Frisk about but Get-the-Negro, and it was a policy that was cooked up in so-called 'progressive' cities? It was mainly a way of dealing with blacks. And it worked. And the police only did as told.

So, if the elites and the affluent class really care so much about black lives and feel it's wrong for the police to use tough means to handle black crime, then the REFORM must happen at the top. After all, police policy is downstream from elite interests and policy. If black lives are indeed so precious or even priceless, then it is up to the elites to dissolve the police and expose themselves to the brunt of black violence. The Power said Fentanyl Floyd, a noted armed-robber, is a saint. Then, it is downright hypocritical for the elites to use the police to protect their lives and property from black thugs but then to call for Police Reform when black rage explodes about the police. Just like, "Don't blame the soldiers, blame the politicians who sent them to war", we need, "Don't blame the police, blame the elites who recruited them to wage war against black criminality."

Of course, BLM is a lie, mainly the product of Jewish control of academia and media. And American Morality is just vanity and hypocrisy. So many of these white 'liberals' jumped on BLM only as yet another excuse to hurl turd at Trump. Much of 'moral outrage' in the US is just proxy for partisan politics. White 'liberals' who never cared about Russia or Ukraine were suddenly OUTRAGED that Evil Putin is the mastermind behind Trump. Or, 'conservatives' who never cared about China are suddenly alarmed that Biden is "China's candidate" or that "Uighurs are being oppressed". The so-called 'anti-war progressives' who threw a fit under George W. Bush were suddenly acquiescent and even supportive of Obama's wars. 'Conservatives' who supported Trump's relatively anti-war rhetoric against Hillary applauded his gangland murder of Soleimani. It's all BS morality to justify partisan politics. It's all selective moral outrage without principles.
If indeed these good decent white 'liberals' really cared about innocent lives, why the silence about all the victims of US wars? Why are they okay with politicians of both parties praising US 'men and women' in the military when so many people have been killed in wars based on lies and misinformation? Why hasn't there been any call for PLM or Palestinian Lives Matter? Just like most moral issues in Divorce Court are nonsense — both parties will dig up any dirt and sling mud to give moral cover for personal vendetta — , political morality is mostly utter BS, and it's truly vile and disgusting to see all these people desperately pretending to CARE about justice when they really care only about Power and partisan politics.

That said, the white Jungle Faith in blackness is not entirely posturing. White spirituality in the post-Christian age is largely shaped by white sensuality. In a world where Pop Culture and Sports are the main culture, white sense of value derives mainly from who wins in sports and dominates pop culture/music, which is highly sexualized and porny even at Disney. As whites grow from young age admiring black rappers, ball-players, orators, and studs, they have a special thing for blacks that turns quasi-spiritual. It is then fitting that Fentanyl Floyd, thug and porn performer, is now the holy icon of 'wokeness' among whites. When whites feel they must favor FEELINGS over FACTS when it comes to blacks, it is proof that Afromania is the religion of whites(along with Jew Worship and Globo-Homo) — religion is, after all, about faith than facts even if there is no evidence that God exists or cares for you; in our day and age, we must have faith in the Magic Negro, we must favor the Icon and Narrative over reality and truth, just like brainwashed minions in USSR had faith in Stalin despite his great crimes against humanity; both the state religion and corporate cult of the US revolve around Jew-worship, Globo-Homo, and Magic Negro. It doesn't matter that blacks are top thugs and do so much harm. Because blacks are badass as athletes, rappers, and studs, they must be admired, and therefore, their historical suffering matters more than all the other sufferings(except the Shoah of course), and that means everything wrong with the black community must be blamed on whites who, in the sin of all sins, dared to oppress the superior race of stud-rappers-athletes. In other words, white Superego is downstream from the white Id. Jungle Fever led to Jungle Faith.

In contrast, what do most white people care about Palestinians and Arabs? Let those 'sand ni**ers' die by the bushel as they lack the smarts/money of Jews or the badassness/toughness of blacks. In other words, there is victim-supremacy, and the past/present suffering of those with visible superiorities matter more than the sufferings of others. Even the discussion of reparations is skewed this way. Jews deserve endless reparations for the Holocaust but never mind all the Slavs who lost so much under Jewish communism. Indeed, it would be 'antisemitic' even to point out that Jewish communists were mass-killers or that Jews were top sellers of opium to the Chinese(and opioids to 'white trash'). And there is constant talk of reparations for blacks but no one calls for reparations for the brown natives of the Americas. 90% of brown natives were wiped out by disease from the Old World, and their history is one of servitude and peonage under Spanish Conquistadors and their descendants. But those people must now pay taxes in the US to pay for reparations for blacks. That's the essence of white morality, which is mostly BS: Making browns(who suffered by far the most in the New World) pay taxes to pay for reparations for blacks. And notice there is no talk of reparations for all the mayhem the US has caused in the Middle East and other parts of the world. Only Jews, blacks, and homos matter.

By the way, Nick Fuentes is right. Depending on the police is like East Germans depending on the East German police to protect them from commie thugs and commie system.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/crtWAILwV9on/

Tribalism vs Universalism. And then, there's 'TRIVERSALISM' where a Certain Tribe becomes the Universal Idol for Other Groups to Revere and Worship — BLM as 'Triversal' Identity — Imperialism of Guilt and Its Dangers — Universalization of White Guilt about Jews and Blacks

According to Dr. Steve Turley, there is a silver lining to the rise of BLM as the defining theme of 'leftism'. Unbeknownst to the so-called 'progressives', the hysterical emphasis on the sanctity of black lives uber alles may have a fracturing and alienating effect on the 'political left', especially as the modern left has roots in the universalist and individualist principles of the Enlightenment.

So, what will happen to the Diversity Coalition? Many Non-Black Minorities surely noticed that the Democratic Party and Establishment don’t care about them as black thugs and white antifa retards loot, riot, commit arson, and/or just destroy things, especially the properties and businesses of who rank lower in the Holy-Victim-Hierarchy. All they hear is that ONLY BLACK LIVES Matter from the prevailing mantric Narrative. And prior to BLM-mania, it had mostly been about homos and trannies uber alles. Will such selective favoritism lead to bitterness among Non-Black Minority groups? Will they feel betrayed by the 'Left' that is certainly not colorblind?

According to Steve Turley, the rise of BLM undermines leftism because black tribalism is at odds with the core principles of modernism. (Watch the Video Below.) Though rationalized as something akin to the Civil Rights Movement, a call for racial justice than black supremacism, the blind rage that fuels BLM's fantasy-narrative is inseparable from the blatancy of black identity and black pride. Following Turley’s logic, the rise of BLM will likely lead to fractures within Diversity as each group will cling closer to its own tribalism, just like blacks with BLM.

BLACK LIVES MATTER TAKEOVER OF DEMOCRAT PARTY IS DESTROYING THE LEFT!!! by Dr. Steve Turley



But what if that doesn’t happen? What if a certain tribalism becomes a kind of ‘triversalism’, one where a particular tribe becomes universally adulated by other tribes? In a way, the US was ‘triversal’ from the beginning. Non-Anglos looked up to Anglos as dominant, most powerful, and even most admirable. And so, non-Anglo whites revolved around Anglo identity and power. They sought to emulate Anglo-Americans and become Anglo-ized. This was true even of German Jews in the US; they aspired to be like the Boston Brahmins and Anglicized their Jewish-sounding names.
Anglo culture, language, habits, and values became the standard for other groups. Though sold as Americanism than Anglo-ism, to become an American was essentially to become Anglo-ized in one way or another: Anglo Way Matters. But because Anglo-Americans didn’t nail down Anglo-ness as the essence of Americanism, their star was bound to fade. (Though Islam is a universal faith, it did for Arab culture what Americanism did for Anglo culture, at least for quite a spell. To become a Muslim meant submitting to the ways and customs of the Arab peoples. For a time, Islam was disseminated only through Arabic, deemed a holy language of the Prophet.)

The rise of Jewish Power has been a kind of ‘triversalism’. If we follow Turley’s logic, Jewish ethnocentrism, tribal identity, and even supremacism should have led to rises of similar tribalism among other groups. Instead, what we’ve seen is just about every group in both parties hail Israel, praise Jews, and pledge to do everything for Zion. Instead of boosting their own identity to compete with the Jewish one, they pledged fealty and obedience to the power and prestige of Jews. Indeed, if Liberal homos and Conservative Evangelicals have one thing in common, it is total commitment to praising Jews, remembering the Holocaust, and supporting Israel(because it’s either God’s Land or the nation with the biggest homo ‘pride’ parade). Though the Shoah is remembered as a uniquely Jewish tragedy, it has been ‘universalized’ to the extent that all other peoples are to acknowledge Jews as the most tragic people on Earth, therefore deserving of the most sympathy from all corners of the world; otherwise, you are an 'Anti-Semite'!!

So, it is not true, as Turley argued, that the rise in tribalism of one group necessarily leads to counter-tribalism in other groups. Spanish insisted on the primacy of their culture, language, and identity in the New World, but this didn’t lead to the counter-emergence of indigenous identities. Instead, the native browns submitted to the stronger tribal-centrism of the Conquistadores, and Spanish Identity became the regional ‘universal’ in Latin America. After all, what do Italians in Argentina have in common with browns in some Mexican village? They are united by Latino ‘triversal’ identity.

And consider the rise of homos and the wider cultural consequences. While homos are not really a tribe, they constitute a much-hyped identity and interest group. As homos(and even truer of trannies) are a tiny minority in all nations, one might think their identity and ‘pride’ would mean NOTHING(or even something negative and hostile) to the overwhelming majorities that are straight. Or, in counter to homo identity, straight people should insist even more on their normal identity. But instead, homosexuality and even tranny business have become the unifying ‘universal theme’ among so many straight people the world over. Homos praise themselves, and straights praise homos… just like Jews praise themselves and goyim praise Jews. There are now ‘gay pride’ parades all over the world, not just in US vassal-states but even in Vietnam that lost 2 million in resistance to US imperialism. Even Cuba cucked to globo-homo-mania.

And this also seems to be the case with blacks. By Turley’s logic, the rise of BLM should lead to similar identity movements among other groups: Brown Lives Matter, Yellow Lives Matter, Red Lives Matter, White Lives Matter, and etc. But blacks have gained ‘triversal’ value. They are now seen as so special, tragic, magical, awesome, and/or whatever that so many non-black groups look to blacks as the people deserving of special love, sympathy, and concern by ALL the peoples of the world. Indeed, look at BLM protests and riots no both sides of the Atlantic, even among whites in Europe. Blacks dominate pop music and sports, and that means they are the main heroes and idols of youths all over the world. Chinese boys worship NBA stars as gods. Iranian youths and Vietnamese youths ape American rappers. White women got jungle fever for black dongs, and white male cucks have Jungle Faith in the Magic Negro. Jewish Media promoted black tragedy as the greatest tragedy of all time AFTER the Shoah. Even though the number of blacks killed by lynching is minuscule compared to other tragedies — more Poles died at Katyn in a single event than all the blacks who were lynched by whites over 100 yrs —, but Hollywood and World Media fill the eyes and ears of the world with ‘Muh Holocaust’ and ‘Muh Slavery’ narratives. The cult of White Guilt has been spread by none other than hegemonic US imperialism. And even though there is non-stop narrative about black suffering in US history, there is no discussion of how the US lifted blacks up from savagery in the Dark Continent where they didn’t even have written language and the wheel. Indeed, if the world now believes that slavery is evil, it’s only because hearts-and-minds in all five continents have been colonized with Western Values.

Anyway, the fact that so many non-Jews, non-homos, and non-blacks flock around those three groups as the holy trinity of globalism suggests that not all tribalisms are the same. If all tribes were of the same value, the rise in tribalism in one would likely lead to the rise of counter-tribalism in others. But if a particular tribe is deemed especially great, awesome, noble, and/or magical, its apotheosis might become the unifying idol for other tribes.
Indeed, it's similar among individuals, which is why individualism never leads to egalitarianism. The ascendant prestige of one individual doesn’t necessarily lead to similar or counter-consciousness in other individuals. Rather, the Great Individual becomes the focal point of admiration and fascination for the lesser individuals, a kind of human cenotaph around which other individuals encircle in a state of reverence or ecstasy. The rise of fuhrer-ism in Adolf Hitler didn’t lead to the rise of counter-fuhrer-ism among the German population. Hitler’s super-individuality led to the dissolution of individual agency and pride among other Germans who came to mindlessly shout ‘Heil Hitler’ and pledge undying allegiance to him.

It goes to show that idolatry can be bigger than any ideology. Jews, Negroes, and Homos have attained ‘triversal’ status in the West. As their stars burn brighter, the lesser stars of other groups don’t even aspire to burn equally as bright but slavishly accept the superior radiance of the Holy Three as the defining light of the galaxy.

Promoting BLM all over the world is an example of the Imperialism of Guilt.

Western Powers used to practice an Imperialism of Pride: “We whites are awful proud, and you lesser non-whites must serve our greatness.” In other words, non-white identities should universally serve the higher white identity. Thus, Western Enlightenment Universalism was less the abandonment of all identities and cultures than the suppression or subsuming of lesser identities in service to the greater ones, the peaks of human achievement that all of humanity must universally admire, revere, and serve. And it was whiteness and Western Civilization. And even among those who emphasized Religion or Rationalism than white identity, there was an overwhelming sense that Christianity and Modernity were both nearly synonymous with white greatness and power.

As of now, Western Powers are under Jewish Rule, and they export the Imperialism of Guilt. “We whites are awfully ashamed, and ALL OF HUMANITY must share in our white guilt… even if you peoples had nothing to do with the Shoah or slavery in America.”

So, it went from All the World should follow Whites because Whites have so much to be Proud of … TO… All the World should follow Whites because Whites have so much to Atone for.

Why is this dangerous? Because it forces the particular Guilt of Whites on the entire world. Palestinians were among the greatest victims of this mindset. The Imperialism of Guilt argued “Because whites feel guilty about what was done to Jews in WWII, all the world must share in the guilt and pay the price.” So, Palestinians were made to pay the price of ‘white guilt’ even thought they had NOTHING to do with World War II or the Shoah. And what was said when Palestinians resisted Zionist Imperialism? They were judged in accordance to the logic of the Imperialism of Guilt. They were branded as ‘Anti-Semites’ even though their reason for anti-Jewish resistance had NOTHING to do with European Antisemitism. According to that craven sniveling cuck-historian Andrew Roberts, the ENTIRE WORLD was guilty for not having done enough about the Shoah. How laughable. Most of the world had NOTHING to do with European affairs or the machinations behind WWII. Why should the world share in the European 'guilt' over what befell Jews in WWII? Should the whole world share in the guilt of Mongols who once invaded China, Persia, and Russia?

After the Cold War, the Imperialism of Guilt led to Wars for Israel that killed or destroyed countless lives in the Middle East and North Afrca. But such wars and aggression were justified on grounds of the Imperialism of Guilt. If 'white guilt' means white indebtedness to Jews, all of humanity must share in the moral/financial debt, even though most of the world had nothing to do with ‘antisemitism’. Not only must Germans pay reparations to Jews but so must Palestinians who, indeed, lost their homeland to Jews on grounds that the World owes Jews something. The Imperialism of Guilt imposed the Western Burden of Guilt on the Palestinians even though they had nothing to do with the tragic events of Western History. Not supporting Zionism and Israeli interests would constitute a new antisemitism, the rise of new hitlers, and new holocausts. So, the West feels compelled to support More Jewish Wars. And even though Israel is the most powerful and aggressive nation in the region, we must all stick with the Western Guilt narrative that says Jews are always scrappy underdogs struggling to survive against ‘hate’.

And now, the Imperialism of Guilt is spreading Negrolatry all around. Most nations had nothing to do with blacks, let alone the Atlantic Slave Trade. But the White Guilt Narrative about blacks is being made standard all around the world. Many nations have been made to worship Mandela above their own national heroes, idols, and leaders. They know more about the Negro Victim Narrative than about their own peoples.
So, even browns, yellows, Hindus, and etc. must all share in the special sympathy for blacks. If not, they are ‘racist’. (Indeed, the financial burden of reparations for blacks will largely fall on the non-white immigrant populations who arrived in the US a hundred years AFTER the Civil War. Imperialism of Guilt in action.) What applies to whites due to their ‘historical guilt’ now applies to the whole world. Japan never conquered Africa or brought over black slaves. But if Japan doesn’t open up to blacks, it is deemed ‘racist’. It's as if Japanese must be just as servile to blacks as whites have become. Of course, Cuckpan is doing just that, and its sports idols are being taken over by blacks, and so Japan is over in the long term. In Europe, the result of the Imperialism of Guilt(or more specifically the Imperialism of White American Guilt) is already evident and very dire. Even European nations that had NOTHING to do with overseas imperialism, Atlantic Slave Trade, and the like now share in the White American Guilt. Swedes and Finns feel a need to sympathize with the Noble Negro and open their nations to Africans. If not, they are ‘racist’ just like Southern rednecks.

Now, some people may welcome the Imperialism of White Guilt as a case of the US undermining its own legitimacy and power. After all, if white America is confessing before the world how evil and lowly it is, wouldn’t the self-flagellation undermine the American Hegemonic enterprise? Yes, but ONLY IF the US were still ruled by whites and ONLY IF White Guilt applied equally to all groups, e.g. Palestinians, Syrians, Russians, Iranians, etc.

But the fact is the US is not white-ruled. It is Jewish-ruled, and BLM is merely a Jewish Power Ploy to boost the cult of White Guilt to keep whites subservient to Jewish Supremacist Power. After all, the Narrative of BLM doesn’t focus on Jewish exploitation of blacks, Jewish role in the slave trade, Jewish use of gentrification, Jewish push for the Israelization of US police force, Jewish use of globo-homo to send black interests to the back of the bus, and etc. BLM narrative is all about white working class police ‘brutality’ and ‘white legacy of slavery’. So, BLM is less about black power than about Jewish supremacist power exploiting ‘white guilt’ about blacks to keep whites browbeaten. Jewish Power is saying to whites, “We Jews are holy, whereas you whites are vile and guilty. So, to redeem your ugly white souls that oppressed all those innocent blacks, you whites need to serve us Holy Holocaust Jews in securing Imperialist Hegemony over the world.”

Notice US embassies are not putting up signs that say “Palestinian Lives Matter” or “Syrian Lives Matter” or “Libyan Lives Matter”. Or considering how many Russians died in the privatization or piratization schemes of the 1990s pushed by Jewish-Americans, “Russian Lives Matter.” No, Jews only push Black Lives Matter as a tool of ‘white guilt’ to keep white folks subservient as the cuck-race that blindly supports Jewish supremacist imperialism around the world that has killed or destroyed millions of lives through wars, sanctions, and financial piracy.
This is why those who see the BLM as being fatal to US imperialism are wrong. Sure, it does tarnish America’s reputation by making it seem a ‘racist’ country. But it is a Jewish gambit. Jews know that the MOST IMPORTANT element in the maintenance of Jewish Supremacist Hegemony is white submission to Jewish Power. As BLM will further shame whites, whites will feel even more compelled to serve the Holy Peoples: Jews, blacks, and homos. Indeed, look at Donald Trump. He’s cucking to Jews and siding with the Negroes against the Police.

In some ways, the Imperialism of White Guilt about Blacks will be even more damaging than the Imperialism of White Guilt about Jews. Whereas the latter led to the destruction mainly of North Africa and the Middle East, the Universalization of the Guilt about Blacks will lead to the junglization of entire nations around the world. Canada and UK used to be mostly black-free, but now, it’s deemed ‘racist’ for anyone there to say NO MORE BLACKS. Even though blacks commit the most crimes and cause the most problems, the Imperialism of Guilt about Blacks ensures that the global media will ignore stories of black thuggery/savagery while amplifying any story of a Dead Innocent Negro because Black Lives Matter More, or BLMM according to the Imperialism of Guilt. After all, black military men have been known to rape and even murder Japanese women in Okinawa. But has the US embassy ever held up a sign saying ‘Japanese Lives Matter’? No. Japan and other nations are constantly excoriated for their, as yet, less-than-ecstatic perception of blacks whereas so little is made of out-of-control bad black behavior around the world. The Ugly African makes the Ugly American look mild by comparison… but Jews control the global media and narrative, and Negroes be Holy.