The Total Implosion of Richard Spencer — It's Absolutely over for Richard Spencer — Richard Spencer vs Nick Fuentes

I once cut Spencer a lot of slack because he seemed like an intelligent, insightful, and thoughtful(and much misunderstood) spokesman for the cause of white consciousness.

But later he made noises about bringing back the great imperial game… as if the world is a STAR WARS universe. If he were living in the 19th century, such talk might have carry some weight. But this is the 21st century when white worlds can barely maintain their demographic and cultural integrity. In such a time, what kind of person would dream of being King over Africans? It's good to dream big dreams, but Spencer seems to have no sense of reality. His idea of the Alt Right is making himself futurist Tarzan in Darth Vader mask, leader of the 'fashes' and lord of the apes.

Near the end of THE VIDEO ABOVE, we hear a spitting mad Spencer hyperventilating with frustration over the fact that the world doesn't regard him as Napoleon of All Eternity. The world and all its powers don't see him the way he sees himself. Oh, what cosmic injustice! Now, given what happened at Charlottesville, I can understand the rage, invective, and even racial epithets. After all, what the city did was a clear breach of Constitutional Rights(something which Spencer doesn't believe in anyway). There's no question that the Unite the Right event was sabotaged by the powers-that-be, and we can understand the anger of the attendees. But, the problem is not Spencer's fury. Rather, the substance of his rage amounts to what can only be characterized as the most poisonous kind of white supremacism, one that is hardly different from crazy nonsense spouted by KKK and Neo-Nazi types. All of Spencer's deflections of being smeared a 'white supremacist' now ring false. He didn't come to the event to defend Southern Heritage or to speak on behalf of valid white interests. His big 'dream' was to create a New Empire where people like him hold the whip-hand over rest of humanity. If his dream could be realized, his dark vision would at least have the element of awesomeness. But in the 21st century when the white race is struggling to survive all over the world(even in their ancient homeland of Europe), Spencer's 007-Darth-Vader rhetoric just sounds stupid and ridiculous. It's like the babytalk of a child in a superhero costume on Halloween. Is Spencer living in reality or stuck inside a Batman costume? At any rate, there's no doubt that his agenda was never White Liberation from Globo-Homo-Shlomo supremacism but to become 'what he is', which is ubermensch(ling) stomping his boot on the face of humanity. What petulant sense of entitlement. He should have been spanked more as a child. He acts like a brat who wants to hog all the toys. He's like a girl bawling over lost candy. He’s like Dark Helmut playing with dolls in Mel Brooks' SPACEBALLS

Spencer fooled good people who trusted and followed him. He really is a piece of shi*.



A CURIOUS commenter:

Spencer has always struck me as controlled opposition. He has never had any real base. It’s interesting to note that he always somehow survived the purges. He gets to not only keep his Twitter account but even gets verified. He gets invited to the MSM to pontificate from time to time. He is the Hillary Clinton of the Alt Right. Popularised and favoured by ZOG, but has little support on the ground.

The Jew-run Media tried to exploit him, casting him as the baddie, a role the 'enfant terrible' side of him relished playing. He was also the go-to-guy because he could be charming and congenial when he wants to be. In turn, he was hungry for publicity and saw his chance. As most people in Conservatism Inc. were a bunch of sorry 'cucks', he enjoyed playing the 'bad boy' who dares to violate PC shibboleths. And for a time, he was very good at it, pacing and measuring himself like a smart boxer against a hostile but fascinated media.
Indeed, the media panicked when Spencer appeared to have genuine star power and seemed to be outwitting them at every turn. Were they creating than destroying a monster by placing him in the limelight? At the very least, he came across as intelligent, articulate, and handsome. It was as if Spencer was playing the media than the other way around, and many were genuinely, if reluctantly, impressed. So, whatever the media meant to do, it initially backfired on them because Spencer as media creature appeared bright and capable, even charismatic. Great fortune landed on Spencer’s lap. Alt Right was suddenly a thing, the talk of the town. It even had a cool edgy brand. And Spencer could have run with this.

But the man-child made a series of catastrophic decisions. It's usually the case that the rash and reckless side of the man emerges AFTER he's gained great power. Adolf Hitler and Mao Zedong were cautious strategists before they amassed supreme power, with which they then carried out disastrous decisions like Operation Barbarossa or the Great Leap Forward. In contrast, Spencer seemed to lose all sense of pragmatism and proportion the moment he became top dog of what was still a political subculture. It was as if Donald Trump's victory anointed him as the true ruler of the US, the world, the cosmos. He went totally TREE-OF-LIFE almost overnight.
Incredibly, he encouraged his fanboys to give Hitler salutes at a conference in honor of Donald Trump’s victory. This was not a closed event but a very public one with the national media present. The whole freaking world was watching, and his minions instantly trashed the event(that had gone very well) with Sieg Heil theatrics. And then, the man-child decided to have long conversations with clown Andrew Anglin of Daily Stormer. And he linked up with Neo-Nazi Malt-Right fatboy Matt Heimbach. He also interviewed David Duke. Now, while it's true that Duke has changed over the years and has done some important work, no sensible Alt Right activist with an eye to the future would have associated himself with man with Duke's baggage. But Spencer was increasingly full of himself, as if he was bulletproof no matter what he did. Spencer also got increasingly drunk and erratic, losing left and right the people who joined his movement out of genuine commitment. He could not keep quality people, and some of his associates were just as childish, bratty, and stupid as he is. Like Kyle Bristow for instance.
Then, there was roster of the Unite the Right event. When it was announced, I didn’t know much about the individuals slated to appear on stage, but in retrospect, a worse bunch of morons couldn't have been assembled. Heimbach is a fat fuc* who belongs on Jerry Springer, especially in light of what he did with his father-in-law's wife. Chris Cantwell is nuts and should be institutionalized. Others were hardly better. Now, it’s true that the Jewish mayor and the black police chief were mainly to blame for the melee, but Spencer drove Alt Right into the ground by associating it with nutjobs and morons. It’s like he was handed the coolest train set for Christmas but wrecked it with sheer lack of self-control and appreciation.

That said, it’s not true that he was spared the Purge. He was banned from EVERYTHING except Twitter. His new Alt-Right site was shut down. He couldn’t raise money. He couldn’t book venues. He’d been regularly invited by MSM as the voice of the Alt Right in 2016, but he was hardly called upon since Charlottesville.

The tragedy is he could have played it smart and shaped Alt Right into an important, even outstanding, movement, but his petulance, vanity, and egotism got the better of him. But then, he is philosophically a nihilist, which means he has no core morality other than power-worship, the fist-clenching of Darth Vader in EMPIRE STRIKES BACK. If he were a fresh 17 yr old who read Nietzsche and Ayn Rand and got over-heated with excitement, it’d be understandable, forgivable. But for a 40 yr old to gush about how he’s the rightful master of the universe, it is downright pathetic and embarrassing. People who hear Spencer's post-Charlottesville rant are more likely to laugh than be struck with fear. Ooh, he's the fuc*ing ruler, the king, the lord, the master of the universe. ROTFL.

A CURIOUS commenter:

His comments against Nick Fuentes is also reeking of bitterness. What is clear is that the Alt Right, or whatever you want to call it, is not dependent upon a small set of people. It isn’t Spencer’s pet project and it never was.


Nicholas Fuentes has an edge over Spencer, and it is consistency and commitment, as well as sobriety. He started a show called America First and has kept at it day in and day out, gradually building up an audience. In contrast, Spencer doesn’t know the meaning of tenacity and persistence. He conceived of grandiose plans and made big declarations, but he hasn't finished anything he started. He’s all sprint and no marathon. He created a site called Alternative Right with considerable fanfare but soon gave up. Then he set up Radix Journal, and it faded. It was supposed to have a print version, but it took forever to publish a single edition. He made the second-rate Crypto-Nazi Alex Kurtagic his right-hand man. He said he’s going to do regular podcasts or videos, but it was all off-and-on, never on schedule.
Nicholas Fuentes has his own set of problems. He’s young & brash and tends to fly off the handle(which at least has entertainment value). He’s smart and well-read for a young man, but his temperament precludes depth. He has interest in politics and history but lacks genuine curiosity and empathy. He has the panache to ask inconvenient questions and be contrarian against official dogma & narrative but is too quick to jump to his own simple-minded conclusions. Still, he’s young and a work in progress, and only time will tell if he will become a real player in the field of American Opinion. His positive asset is he keeps at whatever he’s doing, which is so different from Spencer who cooks up big plans but serves them half-baked... or totally burnt.


A CURIOUS commenter:

I wouldn’t even call Fuentes Alt Right. He is like the Alt Lite, but with the exception that he and his group are much less friendly to globohomo and Israel, and this scares TPTB. If people like him gained the upper hand, we’d see symbiosis, not conflict, with the more radical elements of the Alt Right like TRS.

Fuentes is neither Alt Right nor Alt Lite. He’s a ‘zoomer’ revamped with Paleo-Con fundamentals. He’s closest to Pat Buchanan, a Catholic conservative patriot with racial consciousness.

A CURIOUS commenter: 

Anglin, as another puppet, will of course try to sabotage everything as he usually does by promoting infighting and drama. But he is also rapidly losing relevance.

I don’t know why anyone would take Anglin seriously. Daily Stormer is only good for laughs, dumb and retarded but with an outrage humor like Adam Sandler movies or Three Stooges shorts. The proper thing is to just let Anglin do his thing. DO NOT invite him to serious debates. Consider Daily Stormer's take on the Nick Fuentes and 'Groypers' challenge to Charlie Kirk and TPUSA. It's only for laughs. Enjoy if you must but do not take seriously. The problem was never Anglin per se but that too many people in the Alt Right and Dissident Right regarded him as anything more than a clown. https://dailystormer.name/dear-everyone-you-get-what-you-fucking-deserve/

Finally, why is Spencer really really over? Because he sold the media the persona of a sane and rational 'white nationalist' who went against the grain/stereotype of the demented 'white supremacist' so often spread by the media. Spencer's brand had value as long as he could persuade people that his true self had no relation to the cartoonish image created by the Jewish Media of the KKK and Neo-Nazis. The Spencer shtick was most effective when the Media said "Look, evil scary white supremacist monster" but Spencer smiled and presented himself as a smart guy who cares about his race and culture. Because of Spencer's privileged background and educational credentials, respectability mattered more to his image than to anyone else on the Alt Right. Sure, he could be a bit edgy and do the enfant terrible thing that could be funny.
But the post-Charlottesville rant exposes Spencer as a truly contemptuous, deranged, vile, and vicious piece of turd who feels he is entitled to rule over the world because his childish self wants all the toys for himself. Just like virginity, once lost, cannot be regained, there is no way Spencer can persuade and regain the trust/respect of anyone of good will and rationality. In some ways, it's a good thing because imagine if a far more persuasive and sociopathic Spencer had indeed succeeded with a movement by concealing his truly ugly self that finally emerged when he amassed considerable power. Spencer is not a man of sound mind and body. He's borderline bipolar and semi-sociopathic. It's like the nutty character by Keir Dullea in BUNNY LAKE IS MISSING who seems sane throughout the movie only to be revealed as batshit crazy. Spencer is not clinically crazy but batshit stupid. Spencer once argued that the enemy sees 'white nationalists'(and even conservatives) as worse than wrong; unapologetic whites are seen as worse than evil, irredeemable. Well, at least in Spencer's case, he has proven the enemy right. He really is a pile of shit. Well, at least he has that going for him: The pride of being a stupid amoral bastard.

Some Thoughts on Colin Liddell's Criticism of the Alt Right and His Need to Rebrand as Affirmative Right — The Usefulness for Politics of Irreverence — The Need for the Left-Right

Colin Liddell of Affirmative Right

https://affirmativeright.blogspot.com/2018/04/walking-away-from-broken-brand.html

Colin Liddell:

As for the original banner itself—loaded with all the mistakes and bad karma of the movement, and an easy target for our enemies—it is now more of hindrance than a help.
It has entered Normiespace and the offices of Big Tech merely as a reason to avoid us and not listen to our invincible arguments or engage with our unbeatable ideas. It has become nothing more than a ticket to deplatforming. I therefore choose to toss it aside and to adhere to the true spiritual banner of the movement—the quest for truth, honour, morality, and life.
For this purpose, I have chosen to rename this site Affirmative Right and to redefine what we do here with a set of principles designed to avoid the mistakes of the past (more on that later).

Will changing the label to 'affirmative' do the trick? What if Andrew Anglin and others take up that banner as well? After all, chameleon Anglin initially attacked the Alt Right but later labeled himself as such(and even trolled that he's with the GOP and Trump).

One problem with Colin Liddell and others like him(expatriates) is they are too far removed from ground zero of The Action to lodge legitimate complaints. Many Alt Right figures are in Hungary, Georgia, Ukraine, India, Japan, Philippines, or some other part of the world. Richard Spencer and Mike Enoch got to define the Alt Right because they are in the US. As such, they could organize where The Action is. If Liddell were in the US or EU(two areas most crucial to the fate of the white race), he could have led a counter-movement to define the Alt Right in his manner. But, like too many expatriates, all he can offer are words and criticism. Granted, many radical leaders throughout history spent many years in exile. Vladimir Lenin moved around Western Europe as he was regarded as public enemy #1 in Russia. Still, he eventually returned to lead the movement IN Russia.

Maybe Affirmative Right blog does some good work, but words alone cannot define a movement. If Liddell really wants to define the future of the alternative-affirmative movement, he has to do more than talk or write. He has to form an organization and lead people. I don't see him being up for the job. And Andy Nowicki is more writer-novelist-critic by temperament than a man of action.
In contrast, Richard Spencer and Mike Enoch did bring people together and did organize a movement. Now, I agree with many of Liddell's criticisms of them. When Spencer ran Alternative Right website with Alex Kurtagic as his main henchman, I posted many comments warning about the dangers of the Alt Right getting too cozy with Neo-Nazi types. And there is no doubt that Kurtagic has the outlook(and looks) of Heinrich Himmler.

Richard Spencer is a spent force. (He should be called Richard Spender.) With his looks and charm, he could have done much for the movement. And I'll give him credit where it's due. He could have had a plush job in Conservatism Inc. if he'd played along and went by the script like most whores in the GOP. He did not and instead staked out a rather courageous path for himself. Still, there is smart courage and dumb courage. Also, just because you're anti-stupid doesn't mean you're smart or wise. One form of stupidity can be against another form of stupidity. And Spencer is ultimately a stupid person whose ideology is composed of Darth-Vaderian Nietzscheanism and James-Bondian Tomfoolery. He loves to clench his fist and talk about power and struggle, and blah blah, but he's really a spoiled brat who thinks everyone should make everything 'fun' for him. When the Power effectively shut down his college tour, he sniffled that it wasn't panning out. Gee whiz, he thought it would be 'fun'. What did he expect from the repercussions of a radical movement that really threatens the Power? The Power is just gonna sit back and roll out the red carpet for Spencer to have 'fun' with? Is that how Jews treat Palestinians? It sure ain't fun for Palestinians there and here(whose BDS movement has effectively been criminalized by Jewish Power). How childish and naive can one get? Spencer is all talk and no understanding of the Power even as he yammers endlessly about power, power, power. He needs to study Zionist suppression of Palestinians than watch 007 movies to understand how power works. Or at least watch THE GODFATHER and NO WAY OUT. He's always been yakking about how it is the Power that really matters, and yet he is surprised that the ruling power in the West used dirty tricks to shut him down? The student of Power didn't see it coming? He sudden fame really got to him. His 15 min of fame owed completely to Hillary and Mass Media's attempt to tie Trump to the 'toxic' Alt Right, but Spencer began to see himself as a self-made man than as a media creation and tool. (And as if to prove Hillary and the media correct AFTER THE ELECTION, Spencer steered the Alt Right into a genuinely toxic direction.)

Also, his narcissism is so stupid(and now stale) that he's turning into a laughing stock. He goes on and on about how the media just couldn't get enough of Spencer because he's so good-looking, brilliant, and awesome. Oh, he's the Don Juan of the movement, the man they love to hate to love, and they can't keep their hands off him. Well? When the Power finally decides he's a menace, the Power shut him off, and that's been that. So, he wasn't so irresistible after all. He's more Don Quixote than Don Juan. (Never mind that the media also interviewed 'albino' Anglin and fat Matthew Heimbach a good number of times.)
But even worse is that Spencer's future vision is hardly better than that of Neocons and Zionist-supremacists. If Jews feel that they should rule the world, the only difference with Spencer is that he feels that his Faustian tribe should rule the world with new rounds of imperialist ventures. (At least old imperialism could be rationalized on the prevalence of different sets of values, curiosity about the world, sense of adventure & discovery, and pioneering spirit. But what's the point of imperialism at a time where every corner of the world has been explored and mapped? Also, a world where any nation can offer stiff resistance to invasive imperialism(as in Iraq and Syria)? Imagine the Brits trying to invade China or India today.
Instead of countering Jewish-Zionist globalist supremacism with the ideal of universal nationalism, Spencer's agenda is to rule the world with white supremacy. It is all the more ridiculous when Spencer can't even order a cup of coffee in a diner and keep a membership at a health club. When white people are on the verge of losing their homelands, Spencer-the-clown's silly little mind is filled with Kiplingian fantasies(of conquering the STARS too -- Let's rule over Ewoks and defeat the Klingons).
In any struggle, the weaker power must seek moral advantage over the stronger power that has the material advantage. If you allow the stronger power to have both moral and material advantage, your side is cooked. But how can there be any viable moral argument from the Spencerian Alt Right when its main message is "Ultimately, we want to conquer and rule the world with Faustian-Nietzschean-Bondian-Vaderian white supremacy?" Spencer is too stupid to lead anything. At best, he's a decent commentator on a host of Beltway topics.

On the matter of Andrew Anglin, 4Chan Trolls, The Right Stuff(TRS), and others like them, Liddell's complaints are somewhat misguided. The real problem was taking people like Anglin seriously, an error committed by Liddell's site as well(even if in condemnation than praise). There is NO POINT in taking Daily Stormer seriously or engaging with their 'ideas' and proposals like 'white sharia'. Also, it doesn't matter if Anglin is or isn't a Fed-asset AS LONG AS Alt Right or Aff-Right people keep him at arm's length.
There are two ways to fight the power. One way is the moral and serious way. But there is also the other way: The irreverent, pestering, and outrageous way of the jester. The trick is to keep the two sides separate. Jews used many ways to undermine White Gentile domination of society and culture. They made serious Holocaust movies & documentaries. They built museums and published many scholarly books. But the other way was also effective. Jewish nasties, comedians, pranksters, subversives, and etc. were masters in mocking Jesus, spreading porn, indulging in vulgarity, and shitting on every sacred cow in the West. Jews made both SCHINDLER'S LIST and CADDYSHACK. Jews host both Holocaust conferences and Porn conventions. The trick, however, is not to mix the two. We don't see the director of the Holocaust Museum having serious conversations with a Jewish porn-oligarch. Now, behind the scenes, it's very likely that Jews of all kinds see eye to eye. It turns out ADL had ties to Jewish mafia since the beginning. But at least for public consumption, Jews keep seriousness over here and clownishiness over there. I don't think the Holocaust Museum will be inviting Howard Stern any time soon.
So, as long as the Alt Right keeps the Nazi-larping trolls in their own sphere, it's not a problem. Even though much of the trolling and 'shit-posting' have been offensive, they've also been effective in spreading irreverence of sacred cows of sacred Jews, magic Negroes, holy homos, and globalism. They've also been effective at exposing hypocrisies of the Power. That is the key, the use of outrage antics and black humor to make people laugh at Jewish power and its bogus pieties.

The problem arose when Spencer decided to have a SERIOUS discussion with Andrew Anglin. Now, one can have a conversation with anyone -- Bill Buckley invited all manner of guests on FIRING LINE -- , but Anglin is NOT someone you can have a serious discussion with about the future of the white race. He's too much of a clown, idiot, and degenerate. His stuff has to be kept in the jokesphere. You can't mix oil and water. The Radical Left in the 60s found out the hard way when its serious wing joined with the clownish wing represented by the likes of Abbie Hoffman, Jerry Rubin, and the Yippies whose priority was gaining notoriety as attention-whores. The Yippie shtick of running Pigasus(an actual pig) as political candidate was funny, but when these clowns were allowed to be part of the Leftist movement itself, everything began to turn into a shit-show, indeed something like the Gong Show. Soon, radical leftism spiraled out of control into a circus and poisoned the Democratic Party in the 1972 election against Richard Nixon.

Liddell is right that Enoch and Spencer were foolish to form a direct contact with Anglin and the Daily Stormer crew, but his site was, in a way, guilty of the same thing by taking Anglin and DS seriously even in opposition and condemnation. Whether pro- or con-, one should never take that stuff seriously. Anyone who's been to Daily Stormer knows the site is criticism-proof because it's too absurd. As Spencer often likes to say of things, "It is what it is." Debating DS is like taking Hustler Humor seriously. Of course, courting DS is even worse, but denouncing it also gives DS far more credit than it deserves.
Anyway, the point is even nasty Nazi-larping trolls have some value to the movement AS LONG AS the movement doesn't get near them. Trolls spread irreverence of sacred cows and premises underlying the Power. It's like Jews will use even Stormy Daniels against Trump. 'Serious' Jews will not invite her to their conferences and gatherings or take her seriously as a person, but they will let people like her vent their spleen against Trump and whomever Jews hate. So, we should regard Daily Stormer as Stormy Daniels of Counter-Power politics. A porn-bomb that can make a mockery of PC and the Power. Just be sure not to take the bomb in your own hand. Let Anglin and other clowns toss them. We can just watch and enjoy with plausible deniability since WE don't officially condone such things. The problem with Spencer and Enoch is they took the stormer-bomb in their own hands. It's like Jews don't condone what Kathy Griffin did with a decapitated rubber-Trump head and publicly even disavow it, but they don't mind OTHERS doing pulling such stunts. In opposition to Trump, Jews employ both the respectable gavel and the jokey poker.

Mike Enoch is the most interesting figure in all this. Whereas Daily Stormer is mostly retarded, The Right Stuff has presented something close to first-rate satire and insightful commentary. But because its satire is edgy and abrasive, it too would be problematic if it became an ACTIVE WING of the movement. As an independent voice cheering on the movement, it can do much good. But as a part of the movement, it can too easily be highlighted by the enemy as 'nazi' stuff. Again, oil and water doesn't mix in politics, especially for a movement with huge disadvantages in media and money. For such a nascent movement, good image is crucial, and TRS is counter-productive as a movement player. It's one thing for TRS guys to make Nazi jokes in their racy podcasts. But it was quite another thing for Mike Enoch to pull a Heil stunt at the NPI conference(after Trump's victory) when the whole world was watching. There was no way the Mass Media were going to cover that as 'larping' or 'joking'. Also, even if Enoch meant it as a prank, there were some real morons there who took it seriously and joined in the salute.
Still, DS and TRS aren't problematic AS LONG AS they stay in their own space and do their own thing. To be irreverent and outrageous against sacred cows, one needs more freedom and vulgarity than serious people in the movement. But serious people need plausible deniability from TRS and especially DS because some of their stuff are really over-the-top. That said, just like all religions were built on both iconography(affirmative erection of holy cows) and iconoclasm(mocking desecration of false gods), the Movement will need not just a serious & respectable arm but dirty fingers to pull down the pants of the Power and grab its nuts.

Finally, maybe what is more necessary than changing the adjective -- 'alternative' to 'affirmative' -- is changing the noun. Why stick with only the 'right'? This left vs right dichotomy has been useless since the end of the Cold War(and fall of communism) and the emergence of the Convergence between 'Fiscal Conservatism'(more money for the globalist rich) and 'Social Liberalism'(cultural decadence promoted by capitalists as the New Norm). Indeed, even regarding the Cold War as a right vs left conflict was problematic as communists nations tended to be more nationalist and culturally conservative than capitalist nations of the West. But because of the egalitarian economic ethos of the Soviet Empire(that seemed awesome in reach and power), people went along with the narrative of 'right-wing' capitalists vs 'left-wing' communists. And because the rich class feared economic leftism, it formed an alliance with social conservatives and nationalists. But in truth, the rich everywhere tend to mainly care about more riches and more self-indulgence. For this reason, they secretly despised social conservatism that said NO to excessive decadence. And they felt restrained by nationalism that said capitalists should prioritize doing what is good for the nation as a whole(like hiring native workers and paying them a decent wage with benefits); nationalism was less profitable than globalism. Because of the threat of worldwide communism, the capitalists went along with social conservatives and nationalists. After all, if American capitalists had treated the American working masses during the Cold War the way they treat working people today, many American proles may have demanded either fascism or communism. Why would the American working classes have tolerated and even supported the capitalists IF the latter had just to shipped jobs overseas, lowered wages, and brought over tons of foreigners to replace native workers? But with the end of the Cold War and the transformation of China from a Maoist to a Market economy, American capitalists had a golden opportunity to enrich themselves with Free Trade and to indulge themselves with fun decadence. The big losers were not only social conservatives and the working class but the True Left and Classic Left that had prioritized the needs of national workers and the importance of speaking Truth to Power. But the Democratic Party went with Free Trade under Clinton, and Big Business made a pact with PC because the 'new leftism'(a bogus variety) emphasized globo-homo-mania that, if anything, was great for the rich because, after all, homos are the most vain and narcissistic people on Earth who love catering to the powerful and privileged. Washington DC is 10% homo, and many of these 'gays' are in the Deep State cooking up new Wars for Israel, new Fruit-Crusades to turn the world pink, and new economic policies to make the super-rich in Wall Street, Silicon Valley, and Hollywood even richer. Calling someone like Rachel Maddow a 'leftist' is to defame true leftism and to give her ilk too much credit. They are not about equality or working people. They are about elitism, hierarchy, Jewish tribal supremacism, globo-homo power grab, and censorship of little people who dare to speak truth to power.

Indeed, we in the 'dissident right' are more leftist than those freaks. Calling such globalist tribal-oligarchs and their commissars a bunch of 'leftists' obfuscates the fact that they are really a bunch of supremacists who don't give a shit about the people. Because leftism has long been associated with much good(as well as bad, like discredited communism) -- struggles for workers, more freedom and liberty, equality under the law, and etc --, it only lends credence to our enemies by calling them the 'left'. Tucker Carlson calls Rachel Maddow a 'leftist', but in fact, his positions are now closer to the True Left and Classic Left than Maddow's. We need to remember that the leftism of the French Revolution forged a new politics where the national elites were compelled to identify first and foremost with the national masses. (Current globalism is neo-aristocracism whereby elites of the world mainly identify with one another than with their own national folks who are to be replaced by Diversity.) Nationalism is leftism as well as rightism. It is about Socialism of identity and interests between national elites and national masses. It is also about the tribalism of shared history, blood, and culture. Even though National Socialism turned evil upon lurching into imperialist mode with wars and genocide, its core nationalist and socialist policy was sound. Indeed, Zionism has been, from the beginning, a national-socialist ideology. It was a means to bring together Jewish rightism(reverence of blood, history, and culture) with Jewish leftism(the need for the elites to be mindful of the people as fellow brothers and sisters than as mere subjects). The reason why Jews hate left-rightism with such virulence among goyim is that they want to keep that great secret to themselves only. It's like Jews in Israel hate the idea of Iran having the Bomb because they so dearly want the Bomb for themselves. What Jews want most for themselves, they most vociferously deny to others. Jews love free speech but not for thee. Jews love Israelis owning guns but not for thee. Jews love nuclear weapons but not for thee. One thing for sure, just like National Socialism turned evil by going imperialist, Zionism too is a moral failure because it went from nationalism(defense of Jewish homeland) to imperialism(use white goyim to wage endless Wars for Israel).