White Americans as Mere EXTENSIONS of Jewish Supremacist Power Than as Free Individuals

Jewish Powerites understand a crucial truth. People tend to be Extensions than Individuals. As a complex domain of social organisms, the human world is more like an ant colony or a bee hive than a random assemblage of lone creatures like tigers or bears. People constantly pick up signals, all the more so in our age of electronic media and gadgets. Every time someone uses ‘my’ device, he or she is being tuned to signals emanating from a center of power/influence. He or she may think, “I’m a free individual with ‘choice'”, but in fact, the possible ‘choices’ are fed into his/her mind through electronic signals.

In a way, people became less individualistic with the rise of radio and TV. Prior to such technologies, everyone in the US did something different on any given night. Some read books(countless different titles) and magazines, some went for social gatherings, some went for a walk, some stared at the moon, and etc. If ANYTHING unified the masses in the US and the West prior to Radio and TV, it was the Bible, which of course was interpreted differently by every reader.
With the advent of the TV, however, countless viewers could be watching exactly the same thing at the same time, the only notable difference being the qualities of TV sets. Despite the ‘participation’ of millions, the programming was decided by just a handful of people, among whom Jews were prominent; they controlled the signals fed into the Collective American Mind.

As the character in A SERIOUS MAN(by Coen Brothers) messes with the TV antennae on the rooftop for better reception of signals from ‘heaven’, he worries that the impact of television, serious in influence but unserious in content, isn’t all for the good of his children. It’s as if the antennae on the roof replaced the fiddler on the roof, a figure of unique folkloric significance.

Still, Jews in general had less to worry about as the Jewish Media Masters were careful not to send signals that might negatively affect Jewish interests. Instead, signals instilled the mass public with the message that one’s moral character is a measure of his/her ‘philosemitism’.
The signals did carry animus, hostility, and hatred far and wide, but they were mostly aimed at whites because Jewish supremacist power needed white submission and obedience, the logical offshoots of white shame, moral paralysis, and self-loathing instilled into white hearts-and-minds via media(and academia). Jewish Powerites needed whites to be in permanent-atonement-and-redemptive mode(for the ‘historical sins’ of ‘racism’, ‘antisemitism’, and etc.) because it could be exploited to steer white thoughts and actions toward serving Judeo-Centric goals. Whites came to think thus: “Because Jews are so good and holy whereas whites are so vile and loathsome, whites must look to Jews for wisdom and guidance and appease them at every turn.”

In a way, libertarianism, especially the kind pushed by Ayn Rand, has been of great advantage to the Jews. Libertarianism served as a loosening agent. First, the bonds that hold a structure together must be weakened; then, the structure can be disassembled piece by piece. That said, the ultimate trick isn’t to break things apart to keep them separate indefinitely. No, they’re taken apart to be used as building blocks for a new structure based on YOUR blueprint.
Libertarianism promised individuality, freedom, and choice for everyone. It was especially useful in disassociating the White Right from its bonds of conservatism. White Conservatism upheld the bonds of heritage and the bonds of race(and of Christianity).

While Americanism(and Western Culture in general) had long been more individualistic than others, it rejected radical individualism. If one had to make a choice between unity/community and division/individuality, the former was almost always prioritized. So, while American Conservatism wasn’t anti-individualist, it put unity before the individual.
Libertarianism was committed to reversing the formula. Among the more moderate libertarians, it was individuality and choice before unity and tradition, but they weren’t necessarily hostile to the latter. Ron Paul belongs to this school. (His is the school of Virtue Libertarianism, the idea that more freedom and individuality will mean more choice and means by which people can make more rational and sensible decisions. More freedom means more opportunity to be good and moral. In contrast, there is the school of Vice Libertarianism that looks upon traditional virtues as ‘square’ & ‘lame’ and believes that the vices will cancel each other out and lead to a kind of natural equilibrium. It might be called the Anton LaVey school of libertarianism. LaVey argued that the problems of gluttony will be solved by another vice, vanity and narcissism, i.e. gluttons, in their desire to be attractive, will naturally control their appetite; but then, what is to be done about the ‘body positivity movement’ that says ‘fat is beautiful’?)

If moderate Libertarians placed individuality before unity(but still valued unity), the radical libertarians were opposed to any kind of unity and heritage. It was all a matter of ‘me and my choice’. It’s no wonder they oppose nationalism that consolidates the organic whole for survival and power. Radical libertarians see such policies as standing between the individual and choice. In their eyes, the evil of Group Interest stands in the way of individuals and their freewheeling options in a borderless world.

At any rate, unbeknownst to most goy libertarians, Jewish elements pushed libertarianism as a means to an end, not as the end itself. Consciously or subconsciously, Ayn Rand and other Jews would have sensed that Jewish Power would grow immeasurably if whites could be made more atomized while Jews maintained their tribal consciousness. Unity generates a gravitational core whereas individuality scatters everything to the winds. The universe is filled with stardust, but stardust remains adrift in the dark. Powerful suns are formed by the gathering of stardust into great concentrations of matter.
No wonder cities have always ruled over the countryside. Cities concentrate power, countryside scatters it far and wide. Even Mao Zedong, who called on his peasant armies to ‘surround the cities from the countryside’, got his education in the cities and, when his side won the war, made sure that the communists controlled the cities with an iron grip.

Paradoxically, city life is more rootless and individualistic, yet power is concentrated there into a singular unity. In contrast, country life is more rooted and communal, but people are smaller in number and separated from one another. Perhaps, city folks are more individualistic because they can take their systemic unity for granted. They live in such an elaborate form of social order that they don’t have to work so hard at basic survival.

At any rate, dimwit goy libertarians thought that individualism was for everyone. Everyone would become deracinated and come to regard himself or herself primarily as an individual, as a ‘me’ or ‘myself’. Everything else — national loyalty, racial identity, religious affiliation, kinship, or etc. — would be secondary or nonexistent. And all groups would move in this direction. Not only whites but Jews, blacks, browns, and the rest.
But just when whites were moving toward individuality at the expense of any other consideration, Jews were playing up the Holocaust Cult, Zionist Ideology, and Yiddish sensibility. Jews were reminded to never forget their Jewish history and unique ALL-TOO-JEWISH suffering. So, even as Jews prized the utility of individualism, it remained within the orbit of unity.
Philip Roth, for example, pursued a highly individualistic literary career, but all said and done, he was steeped in his sense of Jewishness(even truer of David Mamet). Jews were JEWISH individuals, not generic individuals, which is what Jews urged whites to become(like John Updike whose daughters married Negroes).

As for nonwhites, Jews favored varying agendas depending on their relative usefulness or dangerousness to the Tribe. Jews did everything to weaken the identities of Muslims, Asians, Hindus, Latin Americans, and Africans. All immigrant groups had to be thrown into the Melting Pot and mixed with the demographic white base.
And yet, if nonwhites were urged only to be just like whites, ‘generic individuals’, they wouldn’t be of much use to Jews. Indeed, whites and nonwhites as ‘generic individuals’ might come to see eye-to-eye on lots of things. Instead, Jews aimed to use nonwhites against whites. But what kind of useful identity could nonwhites have if they were fully dissolved in the melting pot?
Jews pushed Negative Identity on nonwhites, an identity based on hostility toward whites. Thus, being non-white, be it black, brown, yellow, Hindu, Muslim, or whatever, became less a matter of positive connection to one’s racial or cultural background than a matter of being AGAINST whites.
Blackness, for example, is essentially about being ‘victims of white supremacist racism’. Brownness is mostly about resentment toward the Gringo. And yellowness is about complaining about the ‘model minority’ trope as just another form of ‘white racism’.

While Jews also possess a powerful sense of Negative Identity — “Evil White goyim did pogroms on us and threw us into gas chambers” — , they also have a powerful sense of Positive Identity rooted in history, heritage, and remembrance. In contrast, as most non-white goy groups arrived with weaker cultures and identities, their only identifier is the ‘moral pride’ of being wronged and victimized by White ‘racists’ and ‘supremacists’. It’s like Jews tell Muslims, “Forget about Islam, let your daughters grow up to ‘twerk’ & act like sluts, let your sons ape black rappers, and wave the ‘gay pride’ flag.” So, what would be the meaning of being a Muslim in America? It would be as a member of People of Color who are forever ‘victimized’ by nasty ‘white supremacist Islamophobes’.

As things stand today, Jews have both positive and negative identities, nonwhites have negative identities, and whites have generic identities. Jews have a sense of history and unity(separate from whites) and a sense of moral outrage(in negative opposition to white ‘Anti-Semites’). Non-whites, in their historical/cultural amnesia, lose a sense of who they are and where they came from, and as such, their identities have meaning only in relation to whites: “White racists did us wrong.” Indeed, without their sense of aggrievement in relation to whites, they would hardly know who or what they are.

As for whites, they are worse off as they’re not only deracinated but reviled. Whites are discouraged from looking into their racial, historical, mythical, and spiritual roots. Whites are now utterly post-cultural. When the European past is invoked, it is to willfully misinform whites that Vikings and Romans were black(as Europe was apparently always about ‘inclusion’ and ‘diversity’) OR to remind whites that they’ve been uniquely guilty in some way or for some reason.
Can whites at least be free individuals left alone to do as they please, like the fellas in Richard Linklater’s DAZED AND CONFUSED? No, not even that. Whites are branded with an identity with the reverse moral dynamic of the non-white Negative Identity. If nonwhites define themselves with Moral Pride vis-a-vis whites, whites must define themselves with Moral Shame/Guilt vis-a-vis nonwhites(and Jews of course). Non-whites see themselves as “people who were always wronged by whites”, whereas whites are pressured to see themselves as “people who always wronged nonwhites”. Thus, both non-white identity and white identity lack autonomy and independence.

Jews have a sense of who they are independent of their relation to whites, whereas nonwhites, having far weaker memories, only have a sense of ‘victimization’ under whites, i.e. the Negative Identity of Moral Pride. For whites, there’s the Negative Identity of Moral Shame. As whites aren’t allowed any sense of who they are independent of the rest of humanity — the mantra of ‘Diversity Is Our Strength’ across both North America and Europe has made it taboo for whites to conceive of a world of their own, past, present, or future — , whites have been conditioned to always think of themselves in relation to the Other. Accordingly, there is no whiteness independent of non-whiteness. White Identity is always a function of its relational dynamics with Jews and nonwhites. Because it had long been ‘white supremacist’, it must henceforth be white-subordinate in perpetuity. White minds must obey the Jewish super-mind. White arms and legs must serve the Zionist Empire. White faces exist to be punched by the black fist. White wombs exist to be colonized by black seeds(and those of other races). White industries exist to be shipped to other countries. White history exist to honor other races, especially blacks, e.g. keep believing that the great European figures were black(or would have been a lot cooler if they were black, so let’s pretend).

Of course, all throughout history, whites sometimes trampled on other peoples and vice versa. After all, whites were invaded by the Huns, Moors, Mongols, Arabs, Turks, and etc., and they are currently being invaded by Third World hordes. Whites were also fleeced by Jewish money-lenders, and countless Christian Slavs died at the hands of Jewish Bolsheviks.
But, such thinking is usually verboten. Whites must only dwell on the wrongs they did to others, except of course when in service to Jewish Supremacists. Whites could write off the guilt of having supported Zionist wars on Palestinians, Iraqis, Iranians, Syrians, etc.
That said, when the ‘refugees’ from the Wars for Israel end up on European and American shores, THEN whites must feel shame and guilt for not taking in more of them. When it comes to smashing Arab/Muslim nations, Jews urge white military men to be like ruthless and heartless Nazis. But when the ‘refugees’ come knocking on the doors of the EU and US, the faceless victims suddenly take on the aura of ‘New Jews escaping the holocaust’.

In the 1960s and 1970s, one could believe that Jews preaching Free Speech and youth culture were mainly for a freer and less hung up American on matters such as race, culture, and identity. And yet, what Jews were really doing was using libertarianism to loosen the white bonds of historical heritage and political unity. Once loosened and divided, however, individual whites were to be molded into a new unity, one of servitude and shame than of pride and power.
As for Jews, they sure as hell weren’t going to generic and ‘white bread’, or rootless individuals. (If Jews seemed rootless to goyim, it was because they refused to become rooted to goy cultures. They insisted on rootedness to the much deeper history and identity of their own.)
Once whites were reduced to atomized individuals, the plan was to reconstruct them into a new sense of whiteness, the Negative Identity of Guilt & Shame. And this was to be realized through Political Correctness permeating not only education but entertainment, advertisement, endless social crusades & purges, and ceaseless public announcements.

Jews did it to mold whiteness into an instrument of their Power. Also because Jews sensed that arch-individualism is not natural to humans who are social creatures. After all, there were signs of Christian Revival and the counter-revolutionary Conservative tide in the 1980s after the tumultuous Sixties and the Me-Decade of the Seventies. It was a high water mark for Evangelicals in the post-war era.
Against such trends, Jews concocted Political Correctness, Magic Negro Cult, Globo-Homo, Diversity-mania, and Holocaust Cult as the new secular religions. Jews figured that whites would feel lonely as mere individuals and coalesce into some kind of ‘spiritual’ community. But what kind of community? The kind that is about white pride, Christianity, conservatism, family values, and nationalism? Such was a nightmare scenario for Jewish Supremacism.
If whites were to be steered away from individualism back toward some kind of unity and identity, it had to be one where white sense of worth was predicated on guilt and atonement. Whites feeling good about being white was absolutely unacceptable. Whites could only feel good about atoning at the feet of Jews and blacks, celebrating Diversity, cheering globo-homo, and praising white female race-traitors who go for Afro-Colonization of White Wombs(or ACOWW).

Over time, the Jewish-conceived formula even spread to once conservative American suburbs and small towns. After all, no matter where anyone lived, he had a TV set that emitted signals from Jewish-controlled centers of news, information, and entertainment. As Joe Biden said, Jewish media made America accepting of ‘gay marriage’. All those electronic signals beamed into the eyes and ears of Americans made them regard homos, the proxies of Jewish Power, as ‘angels’ while despising anyone opposed to the ‘gay agenda’ as a subhuman ‘homophobe’, the face of which became the Greensboro ‘church’, which might as well be a Jewish Front(just like all those phony Neo-Nazi groups led by Jewish hucksters).

As such, all those white people turned into mere EXTENSIONS of Jewish Power. Even as goyim today feel themselves to be free and independent, they are bombarded by Jewish electronic signals on a daily basis. The airwaves are essentially mental whips, rods, and leashes. They tell us what is ‘true’ and ‘false’. They work on our emotions. Consider all the stupid white people who were led to believe it is ‘Nazi-like’ to support or enforce border security. Reliant on Jewish-controlled sources for news and opinions, they’re like dogs on a leash. They are like horses with blinders on, constantly goaded with cracking whips.
They flatter themselves as rational individuals, but most of the news they absorb comes from a handful of Jewish-owned-or-controlled conglomerates that work hand-in-glove with the Deep State. Jewish Propaganda and Mind-Control techniques pervade all electronic devices, and even A.I. has been rigged to heed the Jewish playbook. (The devices are like crack pipes. You may own the pipes, but the drugs are supplied by the pushers. You’re owned by the drugs sold by the kingpins.)

If members of the educated class were truly rational and independent, they would be for Free Speech and open discourse, but having been so relentlessly brainwashed and conditioned by Jewish Power, they support speech control and Censchwarzship lest they be ‘triggered’ by something that runs counter to the Official Narrative that defines their lives. Because ‘woke’ virtue rests on whites tirelessly expunging themselves of ‘white guilt’, they prefer censorship to any threat to their worldview. As with Christian sanctimony where obsessive humility is a path to self-righteousness, ‘woke’ self-loathing is perversely life-affirming to many whites who genuinely feel ‘saved’ in their near-worship of the new gods of Holocaustianity, Negrolatry, and Globo-Homo. They got to have their psychological safe spaces.

The preservation of psychological safe spaces invariably leads to unsafe physical spaces. Mind is conflated with matter, as if reality is a projection of subjective wishes. As the effects of BLM have shown, you can’t have both safe spaces for the mind and safe spaces for the body. If the mind, especially the elite mind, shuts out reality in favor of fantasy, the ensuing policies can only do harm, eventually forcing society to learn the hard way.
So many whites feel psychologically ‘safe’, secure and justified, with the conceit of the Magic Negro and the scapegoat of ‘racism’ or ‘white supremacism’. They hiss and holler at those who dare to expose the fantasies. Their turtle-minds retreat into ‘safe spaces’ when confronted with reality.

So, what did their fantasies lead to? Stuff like Defund the Police, resulting in manifold increases in dangerous spaces. Ideally, psychological safe space should be in sync with physical safe space, which was indeed the very basis of suburban expansion since the Sixties. Whites knew that moving away from blacks would make for safer neighborhoods. They knew it in their minds and saw it in the streets.
But over time, Jewish-controlled media filled white minds with false stories and symbols of the spiritual war between soulful blacks and soul-cold whites. So, blacks were always good and true, whites were always bad and false. Whatever the actual reality looked like in the schools and the streets, the media/academia insisted on the false dichotomy as the basis for the standard American view of race relations. Things have gotten even worse, as it’s always Groundhog Day with Emmett Till, as if American race relations are perpetually stuck in the 1950s, while brushing over all the cases of black-on-white violence that have grown to epidemic proportions with BLM’s effective knighting of black thuggery.

Under relentless indoctrination and pressure, even whites who’d taken flight from black blight came to regard Diversity and Blackness as holy while disparaging their own whiteness. So, instead of trying to defend and preserve their own nice communities, they chipped away at the foundations of their own physical well-being in subservience to the prescribed psychological safe space, the crib in which the Magic Negro resided rent-free.
Consider the white idiots in the suburbs who held rallies in honor of Fentanyl Floyd and invited blacks to wash their feet. But then, it’s fitting that the druggy Floyd has been ‘canonized’ by secular progs in search for new gods. In a way, psychological safe space is like addiction to opium. Someone sucking on an opium pipe is in his la-la land. He thinks he’s in heaven, and even though his habit is actually ruining his physical and material well-being, he prioritizes mental bliss over physical reality. Of course, it’s only a matter of time before the deteriorating reality breaks down the walls of one’s delusions(like the Chelsea Hotel fire in the film SID AND NANCY).

In the end, white people didn’t so much become individuals as EXTENSIONS of Jewish Power. Of course, most are too ignorant or stupid to have realized the direness of their condition. Granted, having been instilled with Jew-Worship, Homo-Mania, and Magic Negro Reverence, many probably feel good about themselves, like that pathetic excuse for a man, Will Stancil.
Not that most American ‘conservatives’ are much better, what with the likes of Ron DeSantis, Chris Christie, Mitt Romney, and Marco Rubio. They too are essentially Extensions of the Jewish Will.

Now, it’s natural to be an ‘extension’ given the social nature of man. The real question is of what. Of white identity/interests or Jewish identity/interests? It’s like the Bob Dylan’s song(during his Christian phase) called “Gotta Serve Somebody”. It could be the Devil or the Lord, but you gotta serve somebody. Ants on their own are nothing without the queen ant. But then, the queen ant would be nothing too but for the fact that all other ants are extensions of her key role in the order. They protect and feed her, and she produces the offspring that keeps the species alive.

In the case of slave-taking, the ants of one colony can be made to serve another. The raiding ants take the larvae of another colony, and the baby ants grow up to serve the colony of their captors. Of course, they don’t know it, even as they dutifully function as extensions of the colony that raided and/or destroyed their colony of origin.
Whites brought over black slaves to serve as Extensions of whites. Because whites were far more advanced, blacks(even as slaves) gained a good deal, but the fact remains that they were no longer serving their own kind but working for the white race. And even as a free people, blacks in the US military continue to serve as Extensions of the US Empire, now controlled by Jews who are most hellbent on Wars for Israel and Judaic Hegemony.

That said, if blacks knew that they were slaves because their subjugation was so visible and physical, most whites don’t know that they are essentially mental slaves of Jewish Massuhs(who use blacks, Diversity, and Antifa Janissary idiots as overseers to bully and intimidate the white masses). If whites enslaved blacks physically, Jews enslaved whites psychologically. Jews shylocked the white soul.
In a way, what Jews have done to whites is worse than what whites did to blacks. Despite their physical bondage, blacks were gifted with Christian souls. For all the backbreaking work, blacks learned that God is bigger than any number of white folks with guns & whips, and that Jesus, the Son of God, loves the wretched of the Earth, the poor, and the oppressed. So, even as whites shackled blacks physically, they freed black souls from the depths of jungle savagery. And in time, black Christians would embark on a spiritual as well as political struggle for freedom and dignity.

In contrast, Jewish Power used the media and academia to rob whites of their hearts and minds, their souls. Jews, the masters of psychology, devised the most effective methods of mind control. Within the corridors of white psyche, Jews placed all sorts of traps and poisons so that whites would feel nauseous at any thought of ‘white pride'(like Alex in A CLOCKWORK ORANGE) and nervous at any thought of offending Jews, blacks, and homos.
Jewish mind-control crept into the hearts of white goyim and convinced them that the essence of Christianity is the worship of sodomy and some Negro junkie named George Floyd.

Any man, however smart or strong he may be, is only so much on his own. He is just one person. He gains power by turning other men into extensions of himself. Their bodies serve as extensions of his mind, will, and vision. He is the will-to-power. Under Adolf Hitler, it was as if all Germans were extensions of the Fuhrer’s arms and legs. And under Mao, countless Chinese were carriers of his will. More Extensions means more Power.

Jewish Powerites can tolerate goyim only as extensions of their tribal will. There are many more Extensions than Extenders, just like there’s only one Sun but several planets in the Solar System. THE GODFATHER is not about individuals but about a handful of characters, Vito and Michael(and Barzini), who are Extenders while the rest are mostly Extensions or Buffers of one kind or another.

At one time, Jews rose up the ranks in the US as Extensions of WASP Power, but the tables were turned, and now WASPs serve as Extensions of Jewish Power. The difference is that even Jews-as-extensions had a powerful sense of who they were and looked to the day when they might rule.
In contrast, today’s WASP Extensions of Jews are truly a sorry and pathetic lot. They are without identity or pride, sappily servile as minions of Jews. They are like ants serving another colony without the slightest trepidation. They are ‘white uncle toms’ or ‘white toms’.
And if WASPs in the past thought it was rather uncouth to be overly ‘Anti-Semitic’, Jews today are utterly shameless and relentless in insulting, humiliating, and dehumanizing whites at every opportunity.

And what do whites react to all this? They on their knees and beg the Jews, “Can I suck your dic*?” At most, some whites will boast, “I sucked but didn’t swallow” as a point of pride. How utterly pathetic. In the movie MY BODYGUARD, the small kid is bullied by tougher kids and recruits a much bigger guy to serve as his Extension. Jews are nothing without their Extensions.

Ironically, white people are the most valuable extension of Jewish Power even as Jews employ Diversity as a bulwark against a possible White Awakening. Jews regard whites as the most indispensable but also the most dangerous horse that may throw off the Jewish rider and kick him in the skull and run off to be free. It’s no wonder that Jews use Diversity as added baggage on the horse to weigh it down. Of course, if Diversity serves as the straw that breaks the white horse’s back, Jews will end up with nothing. With whites, it’s a game of carrots and sticks. Carrots for the white ‘House Goyim’ who collaborate with the Jewish Massuh but sticks for the white ‘Field Goyim’ who refuse to pick cotton. (It’s like Leon Wieseltier’s formula for dealing with Muslims. Total ruthlessness OVER THERE where they pose a threat to Israel but kindness OVER HERE where they are part of the coalition against whites.)

Jews use Diversity against whites but worry that excessive anti-white bashing may lead to diminished white energies, in which case whites won’t be so useful as managers and foot-soldiers of the empire. In MY BODYGUARD, we naturally sympathize with the small kid because we don’t like bullies. We understand his recruitment of the big guy as an extension. But the kid is also a smart-ass and a jerk. A darker version of him is Sean Penn’s character of Davey Kleinfeld in CARLITO’S WAY. Kleinfeld is all brains and no brawn. He can get people to do all kinds of things for him. And yet, he is a crook and an arch-criminal in the making.

Over the years, many Americans have come to believe that Jews are the smartest, wisest, most decent, most judicious, and most understanding people on Earth, not least because of the Covenant and the Holocaust. Then, why not have Jews take over as the new ruling elites? Why not be guided by Jewish intellectuals, activists, and scholars? What better kind of elites could one hope for? Let the US be led by such wise-men and let the goyim accept their proper roles as eager Extensions of Jewish Power.

The problem with such a view is it misunderstands the nature of power. It may well be that there are wise, smart, and judicious Jews, but such people almost never gain power. Power almost always ends up with the cunning, devious, egotistical, ruthless, greedy, vain, nasty, vicious, corrupt, unscrupulous, and/or decrepit.
Indeed, the wisest Jews prefer truth to power, meaning they can never fill the power vacuum, which ends up being filled by power-mad Jews(like Victoria Nuland). What kind of Jews gained power? The likes of Norman Finkelstein(who, for all his faults, is sincere in trying to come to terms with the Palestinian issue) or a sleazebag like Chuck Schumer?
Therefore, Jewish domination didn’t lead to the rule by wise-men but by gangsters with law degrees. George Soros, Paul Singer, Mark Zuckerberg, and the like. The Question is, “Do you want to be an Extension of this Power, or do you want to cut free and become an Extension of the forces that defend, support, and preserve YOUR OWN race, culture, and history?” Choose the Proper Extensionism for yourself.

If Whiteness has no Validity or Meaning, then Whites cannot lay claim to anything, and there is No Common White Property — The Political Art of White Dispossession by Jewish Supremacism, especially by pushing ACOWW or Afro-Colonization of White Wombs

What secures the survival and well-being of a people? What keeps them healthy in body and spirit? What provides them with a sense of meaning and purpose, even destiny? What fills them with a sense of distinctness, a special quality that makes them rise above mere genericity, rise above the occasion?

A people must have a sense of their evolutionary origins and understand what makes them different from other races. If of a spiritual bent, a people must be bound by the conviction that God created different peoples, and each group is unique in its own way. A people must have a sense of history. Just like every individual has his own unique biography and every family has its own story, every people need to keep with their own history with its origins, myths, tales, and heroes & villains. Just like it's tragic for an amnesiac or an Alzheimer patient robbed of memory, a people without historical memory and a deep sense of roots & mythic bonds are truly lost, like a confounded hiker or navigator without a compass, no sense of where he came from and no sense of where he's going and why.
For security-sake, it's essential that a people lay claim to certain territories as rightfully theirs. A people without a country are like a man without a home: Doomed to wander as nomads. There's a difference between a traveler and a nomad. A traveler has a home to return to in the end, like Odysseus. In contrast, a nomad is a chronic wanderer. Steve Martin's character in PLANES, TRAINS, AND AUTOMOBILES has a home and a family waiting for him. John Candy's character is always on the road, condemned to drift from place to place.
Furthermore, as one lives forever, a people must produce new generations, and this requires the union of man and woman. To preserve the unique features of form and beauty of a people, most of the sexual unions must be among the men and women of the group. Excessive miscegenation leads to something like the mulatto-mestizos of Latin America, confused populations with weak sense of who or what they are.
In addition, to ensure the synthesis of identity, history, and territory, there must be proper authority, a concentration of power, that works to lead, represent, defend, and preserve the people and culture. Without these supports, a people's long-term survival comes into question. It's like there's no guarantee that a chair with four wobbly legs will remain standing. If a horse with one broken leg is useless, imagine one with four broken legs. What happens to a building when its columns or support beams are broken? The whole thing may well crumble to the ground. Indeed, bigger the structure, stronger its support system must be. Bigger they are, firmer they must stand... or else harder they fall.

Now, it's possible for a people/culture to survive without all the supports. Jews certainly did for nearly two thousand years without a homeland to call their own, and Kurds continue as a people & culture despite being dispersed among several non-Kurd-majority nations like Turkey, Syria, Iran, Iraq, and etc. In the case of the Jews, their magic formula was the Covenant, which went beyond mere identity, territory, and history. The Covenant created a spiritual bond between Jewish Blood and Heavenly Spirit. It meant that wherever Jews may be, whatever straits they were in, and however downtrodden they may be, they are the Chosen People favored by the one and only true God. The fact that Jews survived over the millennia despite so many setbacks(and even loss of territory) is a testament to the power of bonding blood with spirit. At any rate, Jews are an exception in history.
Furthermore, while there's much to learn from the Jewish Example, one should never heed Jewish advice as the essence of Jewishness is to maximize its own tribal power, wealth, influence, and control at the expense of goyim. If something works great for Jews, Jews will recommend the very opposite for the goyim. But then, Jews are being smart in their deviousness. If gold is buried in spot A, of course it makes sense for Jews to tell others it's buried in spot B... or C or D or E. It's like the Vikings who settled in Iceland wanted it for themselves. So, they gave it the forbidding name of 'Iceland' to keep others away while naming a far less hospitable land mass 'Greenland'. Likewise, Jews want to hoard their own 'Iceland' for themselves while recommending the metaphorical 'Greenland' for goyim. Iceland is really green whereas Greenland is frozen.

For most peoples, the failure to secure one of the pillars of peoplehood is like being a Paralympian than an Olympian. It's like competing with a missing arm or leg or with a broken spine. Such peoples must hobble through history and are always at a disadvantage vis-a-vis others with sturdier, sounder, and more complete support systems. An engine running on all six cylinders has more kick than one running on three. A plane with four working propellers is preferable to one with only two working. Jews are like someone using both arms and both legs urging others to tie one hand behind the back and jump around on one foot. Some Jews go even further and urge upon goyim to cut off all limbs. Jews would have goyim, especially white goyim, turn into Boxing Helena.

Still, a people with one or two cylinders working are better off than a people with all the cylinders out of order. The rule of history is that a people with essential support systems, no matter how poor and backward, are better positioned to survive into the future than a people who, no matter how well-fed and affluent, have been robbed of theirs. Indeed, compare the Palestinians and Anglo-Canadians. The latter enjoy much better living standards than the tragic Arabs living under Zionist occupation and tyranny. But, whereas Palestinians doggedly cling to their pride of identity and sense of history(and totally believe in the rightness of their cause and see Jews for what they are) despite their loss of territory, Anglo-whites in Canada have no pride of identity, no sense of history, and no claim of territory. Indeed, for Anglo-whites nothing is conceivably more evil than the idea of white authority/power in service of white interests. Even as a defeated people, Palestinians know what they are and do what they must to survive. Despite their affluence and privileges, Anglo-whites of Canada have zero defense systems against the Great Replacement(or White Nakba) and, if anything, believe the evil of whiteness must be erased by Diversity, Inclusion, and Equity, or D.I.E.
So, whereas Palestinians struggle to remain Palestinians with each passing year, Anglo-whites lose out ever more in Canada(and it's the same in all of Anglosphere and Germanosphere as Northern European whites are now totally mind-controlled by Jews). Of course, Jews sought to mind-trick the Palestinians as well. Zionists argued there's no such thing as the Palestinian people, Palestinian culture, or Palestinian history. Jews said it's all just a 'social construct'(but for some reason, we are to believe Zionism is so natural and real that it has the right to destroy the natives of Palestine to make room for Euro-Israel dominated by Ashkenazim). If Palestinians didn't take the vile Jewish bait, whites not only took it but swallowed the whole thing as good medicine... only to have the hook stuck inside their intestines which are now fatally wounded and bleeding.

Jews rule the world and seek to undermine and invalidate any concept of White Property or White Possession. White Dispossession is the name of the game. This is why Jews attack the very notion of whiteness. If whiteness is a valid category, then whites would have reasons to defend their identity, heritage, history, territory, wealth, authority, and power. But if whiteness is invalid, just some ‘racist’ construct or at best a figment of the imagination, then whites have no unique, special, and/or commanding claim to anything. Minus such conviction, whites don't deserve to own anything as a people, not least because even their peoplehood lacks legitimacy.
Of course, whites as individuals can own stuff, even lots of stuff(like Bill Gates or Warren Buffett), but there is nothing that whites as a race, culture, or people can have, defend, and preserve as their own. The politically correct mantra of Diversity really means that anything white can be claimed and taken by nonwhites? (It's like Asian-Indians as individuals could gain wealth under British Imperialism, but they, as a people, could not claim India as a national entity independent of Rule Britannia).
It's akin to conditions of slavery, at least on the legal and psychological level(even if whites aren't literally slaves). Consider blacks in the American South when slavery still existed. Not all blacks had to pick cotton from sunup to sundown. Some black slaves could learn a craft and earn money(even save enough to purchase their own freedom). But no matter how much they earned(and even upon gaining freedom), it was virtually forbidden for them to think that they deserved or owned anything as a collective, as a people. For blacks, wealth and freedom were just individual matters. Some blacks could do pretty well as individuals and some could be legally free, but they couldn't be empowered as an united people.

Today, Jews have done the same to whites who are but soul-slaves of the Zionic Tribe. Jeff Bezos and Tim Cook are among the richest whites in the world, but their wealth is purely an individual matter. They can spend it on themselves and their close ones but never ever for white interests. But then, as people aren't mere individuals but part of a larger community, what can rich whites do to show they aren't just in it for themselves? There are three choices: (1) Libertarianism, a soulless ideology about 'muh freedom' that only further atomizes the white race and separates rich whites from those with less (2) The Approved Tribalism or Idolatry of Jews, blacks, and homos — even though Identity is generally denied to most groups, especially whites and Palestinians, it is not only tolerated but celebrated among Jews, blacks, and homos as the three magical groups (3) Mania for Diversity and Inclusion, which means rich whites should care about nonwhites around the world and welcome them into the West, not least to snub and replace 'racist' whites.

Is it any wonder that Jews(who are only 2% of the US population), blacks(who are 13% of the population), and homos(who are only 2.5% of the population) have more authority than whites? All Jews can coordinate together for Jewish Power. Blackness has been made sacred, i.e. blacks, just by being black, are deemed holy. Globo-Homo is now celebrated, and an entire month is reserved for Limp-Wristianity or Queertianity as replacement for Christianity. And even though the identities of Mestizos, Asians, Arabs, and etc. aren't especially regarded in the West, they have prestige as 'immigrants' bearing the wonderful gift of Diversity, further pushing whites to the back of the bus. (Of course, no one asks why people from Latin America must come to the US for a better life when their own countries are plenty diverse. Why has Diversity failed to do its magic for Latin America? Does Diversity become magic only when whites in the West are on the verge of losing their majority status? Odd how that works.)

Anyway, War-on-Whiteness(or WOW) and the ensuing White Dispossession allow Jews to lay claim to and gain possession of just about anything that once belonged to the white world. Nothing white is deemed sacred or priceless. Jews look upon the white world as a Jewish pawnbroker looks upon property. They are all trinkets for his taking. Everything white has a price tag and can be bought or sold or just taken by Jews or nonwhites.
Of course, Syrians aren't so lucky either. Jewish-controlled US foreign policy led to the military occupation of entire swaths of Syrian territory. The way Jews see it, Syria doesn't belong to Syrians, and Jews can use their goy military puppets to invade and occupy any piece of Syrian territory at whim. Currently, Syrians don't even have access to their own oil due to Jewish-guided US occupation. And of course, Palestinians in West Bank are silenced by the Jew-run media while yet another piece of their territory is swallowed up by Jewish invader-settlers. Jews look upon all the goy world as their oyster or goyster.

Since whiteness is an evil notion, the idea of White Territory is intolerable. Whites have no territory to call their own. All of the West must be on the auction block. It is to be sold and bought. Worse, any bunch of nonwhites can trample into white lands because Jewish-controlled globalism(the current ideology of the West) says Europeans don't even own the identity or meaning of European-ness. Anyone can become 'European' because globalism defines 'European-ness' as the celebration of Diversity, Inclusion, and Equity.
So, while white individuals can own lots of private property, there isn’t a single square inch in the world to designate as White Territory. Jewish supremacists who rule the West insist that whiteness is an evil that must be eradicated, and therefore, nothing can be claimed in the name of whiteness. White people must live merely as generic people or deracinated individuals in service to Jewish Identity, globo-homo-afro idolatry, and globalist ideology. Of course, Viktor Orban disagrees and says Hungary is sacred birth-and-burial ground for Hungarians. Jews cannot tolerate this. Not because Hungary itself is an important and consequential nation in the literal sense — a middle-income country with population of mere ten million, it isn't — but because its European-and-Christian-centered nationalism, in rejecting the entire paradigm of the Jew World Order, may inspire whites around the world to think outside the Jewish Box and say NO to Jewish Supremacism in the name of White Liberation. To Jewish Supremacists, the Hungarian example is akin to Palestinians saying Palestine is their homeland on the basis of pride of identity, resilience of history, and claim of territory. Well, at least Jews also have historical roots in the Holy Land, but it is outrageous how they lay claim to all the West that rightfully and racially belongs to whites.

For Jewish supremacists, the idea that white women belong to white men to have white kids with in order to preserve the white race is also evil. As whiteness is just a figment of ‘racist’ fantasy, white women are mere commodity for other races. They are whores for Jewish merchants and ho’s for black men. Jews say there is no deep and meaningful bond between white men and white women because whiteness is just garbage cooked up by ‘racists’. This is what Jews push. Jews want white wombs to be colonized by black men.
But it's rather odd if one thinks about it. On the one hand, Jews and blacks impugn whiteness as just worthless garbage, but they seem obsessed with white beauty that is the product of tens of thousands of evolution whereby white men mated with white women. If Jews and blacks see nothing special about whiteness, why do THEY lay claim to beauty that is unique to whites? Of course, the black threat is especially damaging to whites because of the Jungle Fever factor. Even with anti-whiteness in full force in media and academia, most white women won't sexually venture outside whiteness as they don't feel much attraction to most nonwhite men. But it's different with white women and Negroes because black men are better at sports, can holler & sing louder, and have bigger dongs. Indeed, even when the West was 'racist' and enforced taboos against miscegenation in the past, some white women went with black men because of the sheer pull of jungle fever. In our times when Jews control ideology(propaganda) & idolatry(marketing) and outright promote Jungle Fever and encourage millions of black Africans to move to the West, ACOWW or Afro-Colonization of White Wombs is an existential threat to the white race. It effectively turns white women into 'mudsharks' and reduces white men into wussy cucks, resulting in the erasure of European uniqueness in form and beauty as the white race will be mulatto-ized and claimed by blackness that, contra whiteness, is much celebrated and even sacralized in the Jew World Order.
The way Jews see it, Jewish Supremacism depends on white submission, and there is no better way to effect permanent white obeisance than by breaking the sacred bond between white men and white women with Jungle Fever. Today, cuckenized white men celebrate the very fact that white women reject them and go with blacks. Jews brainwashed white males into believing that black sexual imperialism and white sexual defeat are synonymous with 'anti-racism' when, in fact, it's premised on black men being superior men to white men. Of course, it could be just a case of White Male Cope. Since they are losing white women to black men and can't do anything about it, they pretend they are letting it happen of their own accord out of racial magnanimity or commitment to combating 'racism'. So, even though white women are being taken away from white men, white men pretend they are giving their women away out of free will. It's like the landlord in THE GODFATHER PART 2 who complies with Vito Corleoene's request out of fear but pretends it's out of the goodness of his heart.

In the Jew World Order, there can be no such thing as White History, yet another essential pillar or support system lost for the white race. Indeed, Jews insist White History never existed because whiteness was always a fantasy of ignorance + supremacism and nothing else. Kids nowadays are told Greeks and Romans weren’t white. Iceland and Sweden were always 'multicultural', meaning multi-racial. Blacks always roamed around Britain and France. So, why not fill up all new movies about European lore and history with blacks and nonwhites? And even if some parts of Europe were indeed all-white, how terrible indeed and in need of being remedied with the wonders of Diversity. It's as if such whites lived inside a cave without the sun and must be brought out into the light. Shame on such history for its lack of diversity. As diversity is so wondrous, all Europeans must fantasize that their ancestors and heroes were black even if such weren't the case.

As for the politics of white authority or white power, NO WAY insist the Jews. Whiteness is ‘racist’, therefore any power or authority centered on serving white identity and interests is totally anathema to all that is good. So, while white individuals can make lots of money and work for powerful institutions, they must never think white or serve white interests. They must serve lofty ideals such as ‘diversity’, ‘inclusion’, and ‘equity’…. though for some reason, they must also serve Jews and blacks and homos as the Holy Three even though we’ve been told tribalism is wrong.

This is why whites are so powerless. Even though whites are still numerous in the West, have lots of wealth, desired for their looks, and are well-represented in elite institutions, whites are powerless as a race because even the most successful white individuals can never ever serve or defend whiteness but must serve ‘woke’ ideology or the idolatry of the holy three: Jews, blacks, and homos. If Bill Gates were to donate a measly $100 to Jared Taylor's American Renaissance, the full force of Jewish Supremacism and its white cuck-collaborators, what with their total grip on elite power, will pounce on him at once and destroy his reputation, connections, and wealth. Also, the courts will dig up anything to bring him down as so-called 'justice' is just a gangsterist lawfare arm of the Jews.

Whites today are like all those horses. Horses are big powerful beasts, but whatever their number, they are powerless as horses because they’ve been trained to serve humans. No matter how powerfully they run and do their horsey things, it’s never for horse-sake but for human-sake. Whites are now essentially saddled horses of Jewish cowboys.

The REAL Pandemic : "HATE CRIMES" On The Rise! - Nick Fuentes

Ron Paul style Libertarianism is Useless against Globalist Gangster Fascism of the Deep State & Big Industry, both of which worship the Gods controlled by Jewish Power — Only Solution against Globo-Homo Gangster Fascism is the National-Humanist Neo-Fascism of the Patriots

When Fascism Comes, It Will be Wearing a Mask - Ron Paul http://www.ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/featured-articles/2021/january/25/when-fascism-comes-it-will-be-wearing-a-mask/

The problem is not fascism as all power is fascist. The question is WHO controls it.

US is under Jewish Supremacist gangster fascism. THAT is the problem.

A true liberal democracy never existed and is impossible. Every system is dominated by one group and its arm of the deep state. And there’s always bound to be a close working relation between big government and big business. Japan Inc. developed that way. So did Germany in the 19th century. So, if state + industry means fascism, even democracies have been fascist. Israeli state and Israeli industry support one another. If that is the definition of fascism, Israel is fascist.

The real problem is that the use of power in the US is centered on Jewish Supremacist interests.

We see this in the apotheosis of the tranny. Now, did most women want this? Did they want to take a backseat to a bunch of freako men pretending to be ‘women’? No. It was Jews who wanted it. Why? Jews seek to suppress any notion of majority identity and pride. Among womenfolk, real women are more than 99% whereas tranny faux-women count for less than 1%. And yet, women now must make way for trannies as champions of female sports.
Why? Jews see tranny power/privilege as analogous to Jewish power/privilege. In both cases, it’s the minority-elite dictating and dominating over the vast majority. When the great majority of goyim let themselves fall under Jewish Power, stuff like globo-homo and transmania were almost inevitable as furtherance of Jewish Power Strategy. Jews see it as cultural rhyming: Jewish minority elite power rhymes with tranny minority elite power.

Against Jewish gangster-fascism, we need a fascism of our own. The problem in America is not the threat of fascism but lack of our fascism against their fascism.

Ron Paul is a nice guy and all. He means well, but libertarianism is useless as a power strategy because it atomizes people into individuals who only care about ‘muh freedom’. To fight the concentrated unity of Jewish supremacism, goyim must unite into ‘ouh power’.
Why did Western frontier towns need sheriffs and deputies? Whereas the outlaws led by Lee Marvin were united in their nastiness, the townsfolk were divided as individuals and too disorganized to come together as a fighting force against the bullies and baddies. It’s like Frank Miller and three men can subdue an entire town in HIGH NOON because the folks don’t think and act as one; each person thinks only of ‘muh life’. It’s like a small pride of lions can kill lots of wildebeest because the latter never unite as a fighting force but only flee with ‘muh life’ in mind. If wildebeest acted as one, there’s no way lions could kill them.

The weakness of libertarianism is evident in the post by the libertarian John Matze(CEO of Parler):

https://parler.com/

The pooter-boy posted a comment:

"Many upsetting things have occurred over the last year. The natural reaction is to cast blame, or to jump to pre-mature conclusions.
We should, in the spirit of Parley, place aside our differences, place aside our biases of one another, and have a respectful conversation in order to improve our society. We shall check our baggage at the door, and start fresh with one another.
I believe everyone in the tech community, political, and others should put their differences aside to move forward together."

What a wuss. Big Tech companies under direction of nasty Jews colluded to shut his company down, and Big Media, also run by Jews, praise the censchwarzship and smear his reputation(and encourage antifa types to make threats to his family), but pooter-boy Matze sheepishly pleads for civility and discourse.
A man so incapable of righteous anger is worthless, but that is the essence of libertarianism, and it affects so many even on the Dissident Right. The sheer dweebiness is sickening. While mere anger doesn’t get one anywhere, neither do mere ideas or facts. It is rage, anger, or passion that fuels whatever ideas one believes in or facts one espouses. Andrew Torba of Gab has the passion along with the idealism. In contrast, Matze is a wuss, a dweeb, a pooter-boy.

Even funnier is his notion that ‘in the spirit of Parley, place aside our differences…’

What? The whole spirit of a site like Parler is to air the differences and have honest discussions and let the chips fall where they may. If the spirit of Parler is to hold hands and sing kumbaya, Matze should serve as waterboy on the Oprah Show. This is why libertarianism is useless. It is weak. And many dissident right types are weak at heart because they began as libertarians who never appreciated the power of unity via fascism.

All power is fascist. So, we need to stop denouncing bad power as ‘fascist’. Rather, we should identify the bad power correctly as THEIR FASCISM while working to construct OUR FASCISM based on our identity and the real truth.

It is war. When the enemy is united and attacking as a force, the last thing you want to do is to tell the men on your side, “Fight as individual soldiers and never unite into a fighting force as that would be ‘fascist’.” Well, that's libertarian thinking. Ron Paul is a nice guy and means well, but his ideals are utterly useless in the real world. An atomized people will lose to a united people, indeed even when the former outnumbers the latter by a huge margin. Always. Consider. If there are 1,000 goyim and just 10 Jews BUT if goyim only act as individuals whereas Jews fight as a group of ten, Jews will win every encounter. There is no power without unity, and that is one of the essences of fascism. Jews act fascist but smear others as 'fascist'. It is a power strategy to keep the advantage of fascism for themselves while discouraging it among others. We need to call out on Jewish fascism and build our own counter-fascism. If you're honest, you'll know it's the only way.

FOX NEWS CONTRIBUTOR SARA CARTER AMPLIFIES DEFAMATION OF YOURS TRULY, PROVING FOX IS TRASH