When All Sides Are Agreed That Anti-White Jewish Power Is Holy, Whiteness Can Only be Unholy - Jewishness is the New Faith in the US, meaning Jews Always Win regardless of Political Outcomes — Jews as the 'New Whites' — White Conservatism Cannot Win Worshiping the Gods controlled by Jews and rigged to elevate Jews to Godhood while casting Whiteness down into Hell as Demonism

 

Jews control the gods, meaning they decide what is holy and unholy, what is sacred and what is taboo.

Now, if only half the nation accepts those gods and demons, the other half would at least be free to worship its own gods. But what if the entirety of the nation worships those same gods. Then, all sides would be compelled to honor those gods and hound the designated demons.

As Jews control the gods of the entire nation, Jews are blessed while whites are damned. Why? Jews who control the gods via media, academia, and organs of the state made Jewishness holy and whiteness unholy. So, whereas BOTH political parties must kneel before Jewish holiness, neither party can stick up for any kind of white positivity.
The Democratic Party now openly denounces and defames whiteness(to the point where the slightest whiff of white identity or interest counts as ‘white supremacy’), and the best the GOP can do is timidly bow its head in shamed silence.

Effectively, the anti-white Democratic Party has the gods on its side because whiteness is now the Devil. Surely, the side that denounces the Devil has the moral advantage over the side that is either silent or tepid in the anti-Devil discourse. Because whiteness is the Devil, neither side can speak up in its favor. One can denounce it like the Democrats do or remain mum on the matter, like the GOP does(though there are plenty of anti-whites in the GOP as well). The GOP is NEVER explicitly pro-white. The great majority of White Conservatives vote for the GOP as the un-anti-white or less anti-white party than as the pro-white party.

Now, if Democrats favored the gods of the Jews whereas the GOP favored the gods of the proud whites, we can have a clash-of-the-titans scenario. “Their gods vs our gods.” But when both sides worship the same gods and reject the same demons, the side that is more passionate in its worship and denunciation has the moral high ground. Democrats are seen as morally superior and spiritually holier because they receive the lion’s share of the blessings of the Holy Three of the Jews, Homos, and Negroes, thus emboldening their conceited sanctimony.

In a world where Jews control the gods, those three groups are the ultimate icons of sanctity. And as white ‘conservatives’ have drunk the same Kool Aid with their ‘muh Israel’ & ‘holy holocaust’ invocations, MLK worship, and even acceptance of globo-homo, they are at a severe moral disadvantage. After all, no matter how much the GOP claims to be for Jews, blacks, and homos, the fact remains most Jews, blacks, and homos are with the Democratic Party. As Jews, blacks, and homos are supposedly holy and better than the rest, the mere fact that they favor the Democratic Party must mean it’s better than the GOP, which is shunned by the great majority of Jews, blacks, and homos.

If God blesses one thing over another, the thing blessed must be better as who are we to question God? Similarly, if Jews, blacks, and homos are indeed holier, their blessings upon the Democratic Party must mean it is the better party of angels.

Acceptance of this template is the fatal weakness of White American Conservatism. It values the Holy Other over its Selfness. Whiteness accepted its lot as a planet revolving around the Jewish sun as the source of moral radiance. As if incapable of generating its own light, it relies on the Other, the Holy Jew, for the glow.

But then, what is the control of electronic media but control of the modern sun? Jews control the media. Those who can’t or don’t create their own light/sun have no recourse but to rely on the light/sun of the Other, and the Jewish Light is coded with the message, “Worship and Obey the Jews”, as if without Jewish ‘wisdom’ and ‘truth’, there can be only darkness and ignorance among your kind.

Indeed, Jews now desperately push for Censchwarzhip in the Age of the Internet because there’s finally a means by which goyim can independently create and share their own light. Judeo-centrists insist on a world where they not only own the bonfire but control who gets to make and share the fire.
After all, if everyone can make fire on their own, they could make their own fires to rival the bonfire. No wonder Jews ordered Amazon to shut down Parler and other free speech sites. It’s like the British Imperialists once monopolized the salt trade in India. The making and selling of salt independent of British Control might as well have been ‘hate salt’. But then, so many lowlife Hindus today work with Jews to control and corrupt the West.

At any rate, while the GOP denounces overt displays of white supremacism like the KKK and Nazis(mostly nonexistent or mostly feds), it doesn’t go whole hog on denouncing whiteness like the Democratic Party does. So, in the current ‘spiritual configuration’, the Democrats totally denounce the White Devil whereas the GOP does so only half-heartedly.
As if to compensate for this moral deficit(of not fully condemning the Devil), white ‘conservatives’ make noises about how ‘Democrats are the real racists’ or how GOP is even more pro-Israel or how ‘conservatives’ care more about defending homos from Muslims. So, white ‘conservatives’ are never for whites or whiteness. At most, they don’t denounce the White Devil as virulently as the other side does, but this opens them to accusations of being half-hearted about fighting ‘racism’ and ‘white supremacism’.

Jews have it so good because they control the gods, and that means both parties worship Jews, Zionism, Israel, Holy Holocaust, and Jewish Whatever. The Iron Law is Jews Know Best, and that’s that. So, even though Jews favor the Democratic Party, they know they will be revered, obeyed, and praised regardless of which side wins elections. If both parties and all factions in the US are united on ONE THING, it is in their total obeisance toward Jews. Jews might as well be god.

It’s like whether Catholics or Protestants win, God wins because despite their sectarian differences, both churches worship the same God and Jesus. So, God and Jesus can never lose among the Protestants, Catholics, and Orthodox. The various churches may bicker among themselves over interpretations and across institutions, but they are all for God. Also, the Devil is always the loser regardless of which church dominated society. Whether a particular society is ruled by Catholics, Protestants, or Orthodox folks, the Devil is the Bad Guy.

As Jews control the gods in the US, Jews are worshiped by both sides. Democrats and Biden praise Jews and Israel. Trump, McConnell, and the GOP praise Jews and Israel. Even Jewish crooks are allowed to run free and remain above the law. Jews are to US political parties what God is among the three main Christian Churches: Catholic, Protestant, and Orthodox. Just like God always wins among the three churches, Jews always win regardless of what happens with the two parties. Jews are worshiped by all.

In contrast, whites and whiteness in American Politics are like the Devil in the Christian Churches. Regardless of which church controls society, the Devil is denounced, and regardless of which party wins office, whiteness is either bad(the Dems) or not good(the Repubs). Democrats now denounce whiteness with murderous glee, and the most the GOP can offer as counterpoint is, “We whites are okay because we go out on a limb to worship Jews, blacks, and even homos.”

Things were markedly different in the past. The US was once a Eurocentric nation and proud of it. Whiteness was at the center of American Politics and Culture. So was Christianity. Neither political party could win by denouncing whites or whiteness(or Jesus). So, whatever the differences among the political parties, they all pandered to white identity and white interests because whiteness was, if not holy, a matter of pride, glory, and dignity. Even Jews and blacks sought to be a part of the White Order as a ‘credit to their race’ in the eyes of the great White Power. And neither Democrats nor Republicans had any notion of promoting anti-whiteness. And while there was sympathy for other groups, such as American Indians, blacks, Jews, or poor immigrants, they were not objects of worship but of pity.

The US used to be a nation where the glory of and respect for whiteness was a given. Just about everyone in the Democratic Party and Republican Party was pro-white and pandered to whites. FDR and Harry Truman relied on countless white voters who would now be called ‘racist’. Also, the theme of Past Liberalism was “whites are good but can be better” and therefore must allow reforms for a more perfect union. It wasn’t about ‘whites are evil’ or ‘whiteness is demonic’, the dogma of the current ‘progressivism’. It was about ‘whites are good but flawed.’

As for most American Conservatives, they have yet to join in the ‘whites are the devil’ chorus but they won’t say anything good or proud about the white race, white culture, or white history. At best, they are into ‘boomer antics’ of appealing to either colorblindness(which no one cares about anymore) or sappily trying to prove that ‘conservatives’ are not ‘racist’, ‘Anti-Semitic’, or ‘homophobic’. Always defensive and apologetic than assertive and judgmental like the other side.

In more ways than one, Jews have become the New Whites. In the past, both political parties pandered to whiteness as the essence of Americanism. It was understood that Europeans settled and built America. Whites were proud that America was built with ideas, values, and skills brought over from Europe. So, whatever the ideological differences, whites didn’t have to worry about the threat to whiteness regardless of which party won. Some whites may have disagreed with Republican policies and other whites may have disagreed with Democratic policies, but those were mostly over economic matters. The GOP was better for more affluent whites whereas the Democratic Party was better for working class whites, but the important thing was both parties were pro-white. So, whatever the political or economic outcomes of elections, there was hardly any negative racial consequence for whiteness.
Indeed, FDR running an anti-white campaign would have been inconceivable. If anything, even Liberals back then ran a very pro-white campaign against the ‘Japs’. And the moral theme against Nazi Germany wasn’t about White Evil but about good freedom-loving whites of the US and UK against the lunatic Teutons under Hitler.
In our time, however, the Democratic Party and even the GOP are loath to speak of any goodness associated with whites or whiteness. Whites can only be good by washing themselves of the sin of ‘whiteness’. This is what they teach in Whiteness Studies, which is nothing but Dogma on Deviltry.

What whites enjoyed in the past, Jews now enjoy, which makes them the ‘new whites’. It is unimaginable for anyone in either political party being critical of Jews, Jewish privilege, Zionism, Israel, or Jewish Supremacism. Jewishness is a Given in the current idolatry. Just as Rudolf Hess once hailed, “Hitler is Germany, Germany is Hitler”, the current US order is about “Zion is America, America is Zion.” Whatever differences may exist between the GOP and the Democratic Party, they are 100% united on one thing: “We Cuck to Jews who are now bigger than god and jesus.” Even with Jews doing everything to destroy Donald Trump and smear American Conservatism, the only thing we hear from the GOP is ‘Muh Israel’, ‘Destroy Iran for Jews’.

If Whiteness was once a Given in Old America where no politician could gain office by bashing whites or whiteness, Jewishness is the Given in New America where no politician or pundit dares to call out on Jewish Power or denounce Jewish Abuse when it happens.
Indeed, it’s gotten to the point where noticing a Jew doing bad is worse than a Jew doing bad. So, if a Jew sticks your arse with a knife, his violence is less problematic than you noticing and stating, ‘A Jew stabbed me in the arse’. Jews were behind the Jew D’Etat over the bogus Ukraine Scandal, but that hardly mattered and the main worry was anyone noticing, “Hey, it’s a cabal of Jews up to no good.”

Goyim in the Democratic Party suck up to their Jews, and goyim in the GOP suck up to their Jews. And of course, the Jews of the Democratic Party and Jews of the GOP meet behind closed doors and work together on the basis of “Is it great for Jews?”

The more things change, the more they remain the same. True, whites are no longer on top, but Jews are now the New Whites. But actually things are even worse because, although whiteness itself wasn’t attacked by politicians and leaders in the past, there were calls for reform against evils done by whites. At the very least, it was understood that whites could be good or they could be bad. Even though whiteness was a matter of pride and dignity, it wasn’t a license to do whatever. This allowed for reforms within the white community. The idea was that whiteness is a matter of pride, and therefore, whites must be mindful to live up to their principles. So, even though whiteness was favored over non-whiteness, whites were hardly blameless or immune to criticism. Whiteness was proud but wasn’t sacred.

In contrast, Jewishness is more than a matter of pride. It is regarded as downright sacred and holy, therefore, immune from scrutiny and criticism. Perchance some Jew commits a great evil and goes to jail, he gets special treatment and is likely to be pardoned sooner than later because powerful Jews look out for one another as fellow tribesmen. Jews believe that even a bad Jew’s liberty is more precious than the lives of countless goyim. And Jewish feelings matter more than the rights and freedoms of goyim. If you say something protected by the First Amendment that happens to trigger Jewish feelings, Jewish Power will try to shut you down. Not only are Jews served by both parties but no one dares to criticize anything about Jewishness. Even so-called ‘radicals’ in the Democratic Party support anti-BDS legislation and travel to Israel and stand before the Wailing Wall like cucked dogs.

Jewish Lawfare Part 1
 Video Link
Jewish Lawfare Part 2
 Video Link

Even when whites had it all in the US, there was the reminder among whites, “We are good but can be better and must strive toward creating a more perfect union”, and this entailed necessary criticism of certain abuses of white power and privileges and also the obligations of the WASP elites. But there is virtually no moral pressure coming from the two main political parties on Jews toward moral reflection and improvement because goy servants regard Jewishness as holy and godlike. The pressure usually comes from dissident Jews, Palestinians, and a minority of white voices, insufficient for decisive change any time soon.

A proud people of dignity are still human and have room for improvement, and that’s how whites felt about themselves in the past. But why would a people into self-worship ever bother with self-criticism or self-improvement? They are holy, they are godlike, and that means goyim exist mainly to serve Jews.
And why would goyim dare to make criticism when Jews deserve something more than respect, which is Worship?
After all, you don’t criticize the gods. Either out of mindless obeisance or abject fear(or both), few dares to name the Jewish Power, and that means American Democracy has become dysfunctional. (Even most dissidents try to rationalize Jewish/Zionist evil as an extension of ‘white supremacism’ than as an innate, autonomous, or self-generating phenomenon.)
For all the talk of ‘liberal democracy’ and electoral processes, the modus operandi of American Political Psychology is hardly different from Stalinism, with Jewish Power now revered, worshiped, and obeyed like Stalin in the bad old days of the Soviet Union.

Political psychology matters as much as political processes. Imagine if North Korea became a democracy(in terms of process) with free elections BUT the Political Psychology of the Kim Cult remained. It would technically be a democracy but still operate like a ‘theocracy’ because most people would have an irrational attachment to idolizing and serving the Kim Clan.

Political Freedom is useless in tandem with Psychological Bondage, which is the case with the US. Despite all the talk of freedoms, liberties, and rights, the depressing truth is so many people, high-middle-and-low, are psychologically chained to the gods controlled by Jews.
Appeasing Jews and their allies is the highest good in the emotional realm of so many Americans. It could be some no-name Karen whose entire life revolves around Jewish prestige, BLM, and LGBT nuttery. Or it could be some cuckservative in the GOP savoring for some doggy biscuits from Jewish Power by praising Israel or embracing Lady Gaga. Or, it could be some Deep State goon who thinks he’s on the side of angels because he serves the globo-homo neo-imperialism. (For shallow fools, celebration of sodomy is next to godliness. What is to be expected in a society where Pop Culture is The Culture for most people, from elites to the masses?) Or, it could be Trump who can’t stop blabbering about how he loves to take it up the arse from Netanyahu and will do wonders for black employment rates. Never mind the whites.

Yoram Hazony & Abigail Shrier give False Impression of Jewish Heroism when Jewish Power is overwhelmingly Anti-Nationalist and Anti-Sanity(on sexual matters) — Why Jews had to especially flatter Black Megalomania with BLM bonanza in 2020

Exclusive: America's Most Important Right-Wing Conference Of The Year Is An Israeli Influence Operation - https://national-justice.com/exclusive-americas-most-important-right-wing-conference-year-israeli-influence-operation

There are HBD(human bio-diversity) types and dissident rightists who promote the likes of Yoram Hazony and Abigail Shrier, lending the false impression that Jews are at the forefront of defending nationalism and sexual sanity when such figures are, at best, outliers in the Jewish Community or, worse, participants in the deception. In fact, most of Jewish Power is anti-white, anti-nationalist(except for Israel), and anti-sexual-sanity.

The only kind of Jews worthy of trust are those who acknowledge loud and clear that the overall Jewish Agenda is virulently anti-white. We can trust Brother Nathanael on Jewish anti-white politics. We can trust Max Blumenthal on the Israel Lobby's influence over America. But Hazony pretty much makes the same rounds as the two-faced weasel Ben Shapiro: Identity for us Jews, not for you goyim. In Hazony’s view, there can be only ‘civic nationalism’ for whites, which, at this late date, is useless. ONLY JEWS get to have ethno-nationalism, though, in his infinite propensity to twist facts and logic, Hazony insists Israel celebrates 'diversity' because it has an Arab minority. In truth, Arabs still exist in Israel only because Jews failed to remove all of them in the Nakba campaigns. Jews didn't invite Arabs into Israel to celebrate 'multi-culturalism' and, if anything, they are hatching plans to realize the Final Plan of total Jewish supremacy in Israel and West Bank.

To my knowledge, Hazony doesn’t acknowledge that Jewish Power is leading the charge against whites(and other goyim), and Shrier doesn’t mention that Jews are the main funders and pushers of LGBTQXYZ nonsense. We are to believe that a bunch of mentally imbalanced trannies suddenly amassed so much power all on their own. Unless they mention WHO are behind the anti-white and anti-sanity agenda, they are bad faith actors and not to be trusted.

And whites who keep falling for such individuals as heroes or champions are either idiotic or hopeless. They are idiots because they name the symptoms but not the disease. So much of anti-white and anti-sane agenda originates and flows from the Jewish source.
Or they are hopeless because, like so many people in the West, they have an idolatrous fixation on Jews: A particular position is thought to be ennobled based on who/whom. So, if a Jew says something, it purportedly has higher value simply because it was expounded by a member of the Tribe endowed with higher innate worth. Such thinking is hardly different from the ‘wokeness' or 'jewokeness' of morons who sacralize blacks and believe something carries greater meaning and moral authority simply because it happens to have been associated with or expounded by blacks.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Racial Reckoning: Just Looking Around by Robert Weissberg - https://www.unz.com/article/the-racial-reckoning-just-looking-around/

It be Bounty for the Mutiny.

Since the Clinton 90s, Jews and New Democrats espoused neo-liberal free trade and globalism. And they began to favor globo-homo over black issues except in rap and sports. Many young black males were thrown in jail and crime decreased drastically(and predictably). Big cities welcomed millions of immigrants who came to replace blacks in many places and industries. Blacks felt neglected. If blacks remained loyal to the Democratic Party in record numbers from 2008 to 2016, it was only because Barack Obama was the face of the party though he was really a puppet of Jews and homos.

But after Obama, there was the black realization that the Democrats don’t really offer them much(unless one works for the government). Besides, most of Obama’s tenure was about celebration of homos, bailing out Wall Street, and more Wars for Israel. And anti-Russian policy at the behest of hateful Jewish supremacists. BLM was a bone Obama threw to the blacks at the end.. with dire results. As too many blacks gained little or nothing under Obama in tangible terms, they were indulged with the symbolism of noble victimhood.
Over the years, the Democratic Party became the yuppie elite party, the college educated suburban party, the homo party, the Zionist party. Sure, it made a lot of noises about MLK and pretended Obama was The One, but most of its policies were along the lines of Stop-and-Frisk-the-Nigger-as-Super-Predator, urban gentrification, celebration of homos(most of them white) and welcoming diversity, aka mass immigration.

But as the GOP was so boring and dull(and associated with the Neo-Confederate South and sucking up to the rich), it could be taken for granted that blacks would remain with Democrats. What choice did they have?

But Donald Trump came along and made noises about too-much-immigration and taking care of America first. So, even though most blacks remained with the Democratic Party, Trump's brand of politics struck a certain chord in the black community. Democratic Party needs almost all the black votes to win in key areas. So, in a long while, the Democrats actually had to compete for every black vote. Now, how could they appeal to blacks when blue cities had been pushing for stop-and-frisk-the-nigger, globo-homo priority, and immigrants-uber-Negroes?

Roll out BLM in strength and make George Floyd the anointed one, and blame it all on the 'white supremacism' of Trump and white cops. And all those white and Jewish libby-dibs, who’d been supportive of stop-and-frisk policies and preference for homos/immigrants over blacks, did everything to cover their tracks; and by bleating about BLACK LIVES MATTER, they did all they could to fool others and themselves that they’ve been agonizing over the plight of the poor poor noble Negro. What a whitewash! From stop-and-frisk to stoop-and-wash(the Negro foot).

Jews control the big cities and the Democratic Party. Long ago, they got pissed with blacks, especially with Stinkin Dinkins(as mayor of NY), and did everything to suppress black crime and revive big cities beginning in the early 1990s. Jews succeeded for the most part, especially in the Big Apple(or Big Bagel). But this led to simmering black grievances about the Democrats in 2016 and 2020, especially as Obama was no longer in the running to placate the Negroes and as Trump came along as da gangsta making noises about MORE FOR AMERICANS than foreigners. So, Jewish Power felt compelled to hype BLM and sacralize Negrohood(to flatter black egomania), as well as spread the money around to keep blacks on the plantation. When all else fails, buy loyalty.

Another factor for neo-sacralization of the Negro had to do with stirring of white politics. Napoleon was to have said, “Let China sleep because, when it wakes, it will be one giant eggroll.” Jews feel the same way about whites. What if whites wake up from their wussy slumber and think independently? Jews fear that Trump stirred the white dragon from its comatose state. Even though Trump cucked to Zionists at every turn, he roused white political passion into a frenzy that reminded Jews of Germans en masse going “Heil Hitler”.

Jewish Power depends on white cuckery and goy obeisance to Jewish Power, and this means whites must NOT have a political consciousness of their own, one that's proud and autonomous. After all, emancipated whites might ask, “Why must we serve Jews at every turn when we are our own people with our own identity, culture, and heritage?”

Therefore, Jews believe they must emotionally paralyze whites with ‘white guilt’, and Jews believe blacks are most potent for this purpose because whites are in awe of blacks as super-athletes, super-rappers, super-butt-shakers, and super-dong folks. White people don’t feel too bad about having wiped out stony faced dull American Indians but get all emotional about how they’d once made people like Michael Jordan and Jay-Z pick cotton.

Of course, we may well ask WHY do whites, especially Anglos, cuck to Jews and appease them at every turn? The great lesson of WWII is supposed to be about how ‘appeasement’ doesn’t work. Neville Chamberlain has roundly been ridiculed as the biggest dumbass of all time because of his appeasement of Adolf Hitler. If that was foolish, why do Anglos think they can appease Jews and come off any better? (If anything, Hitler offered the Anglos a far better bargain, whereas Jews are pushing for nothing less than White Nakba of the West.)

If the Greek Lobby or Chinese Lobby or Russian Lobby tried to push the US or UK around, Anglos would say GO TO HELL, especially if Jews approve. But why are Anglos a bunch of Anglucks(Anglo-Cucks) when it comes to Jewish demands? How did Anglo politics become a dog show for the Jews?

BLACKS ARE TOP THUGS BUT JEWISH POWER TELL WHITES TO CUCK TO BLACK CRIMINALITY - DUMB WHITES COMPLY

In 2020 Jewish Power & Democrats bid up the Value of the Black Vote to Ludicrous Levels because They Feared Trump might shave off Enough Black Votes to Win Re-Election — The Problem for Jews and Democrats wasn't that Trump was Anti-Black but Too Pro-Black — To Compete with Trump's Appeals to Blacks, the Jewish-run Democratic Party pulled all the stops and elevated Blacks to god-status to keep them on their side

CHAUVIN'S WHITE GUILT - Brother Nathanael

BLM got totally crazy in 2020 because of the bidding war for holy blackness.

Usually, Jews and Libby-Dibs needed not worry about the black vote because it was reliably Democratic. And the kind of bland generic white candidates put up by the GOP had no appeal to blacks. Even though the great majority of blacks voted Democratic in 2016 and 2020, Trump was the GOP candidate in a long long time with any appeal to a segment of the black population. If Billy Boy Clinton was the 'first black president', Donald Trump was the 'first ni**a president'. Clinton was a jazz man, but Trump rubbed shoulders with rappers and had a rapport with the likes of Mike Tyson. For Democrats to win in some states, black support has to be HUGE. So, even a slight shaving off of black votes can mean electoral loss for Democrats. If GOP relies on whites voting 60% Republican, Democrats rely on blacks voting way over 90% Democratic. Democrats took the black vote for granted, just like they did with white working class and ethnics in the past, especially following the Great Depression and New Deal.

But eventually, the Democrats began to lose the white working class, the ethnics, and the Southern whites. A lot of this had to do with blacks. When the Democrats were about 'class justice', many have-lesser whites voted for the Democratic Party. Working class, ethnic whites, and southern whites were reliably Democratic for a long time. But when the Democrats moved more toward 'racial justice' rhetoric, followed by black pathology and crime unloosed on the nation, many whites began to move to the GOP. Also, with booming times, many children of working class parents rose up the ranks to become middle class and higher, and back then, money and success were associated with WASP-heavy GOP. It's like Italian-Americans became more Republican with socio-economic improvement.
Back then, the GOP stood for tradition and respectability, concerns that still mattered. Today, no one cares for tradition. Also, respectability means nothing in a degraded culture where even adults have green hair and tattoos.
What matters now is the cachet of being faddish and fashionable; that's what appeals to the successful, and today's affluent and educated are far more likely to be Democratic, especially as the Party is now shamelessly pro-money and pro-success. Democrats lost the white working class but gained something far more valuable: the white educated and elite classes who hold the more valuable cards. Also, globalism is geared to favor the urban rich and has little room for white working class unless one is a truck driver(that is until self-driving cars become a thing). So, Democrats won over the useful kinds of whites whereas the GOP hasn't a clue what to do with the 'loser' white working class that voted for Donald Trump as the Party's been for so long a wing of the Chamber of Commerce. As for Trump, he got their votes and they showed up at his rallies in droves, but his presidency has been about 'Muh Israel' and 'Muh Negroes'.

In the foreseeable future, the Democrats may no longer need the black votes so much. In California, for example, the black vote is meaningless. But in places like Atlanta, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, and etc., black votes can tip the scale. So, for the time being, the Democrats need all the black votes they can get. Before Trump, this wasn't much of a concern as it's difficult to imagine blacks voting for the likes of Mitt Romney or Jeb Bush. But Trump struck a nerve with a segment of the black population.

And in a way, the Democrats do have a reason to worry about the black vote. The Obama presidency blindsided Jews and Democrats to this fact. Blacks overwhelmingly voted for Obama, and it seemed like Democrats had an effortless lock on the black vote. And yet, it's possible that black support for the Democrats actually eroded from 2008 to 2016 despite their record support for Obama. After all, the Democrats increasingly became the party of the rich, the privileged, the gentrifiers, the great replacers(with mass immigration replacing not only whites but black Americans), and globo-homo. Indeed, but for his race, the Obama presidency was most memorable for its globo-homo glitz. In a way, Obama was the 'first gay president'. And even more than Bill Clinton and George W. Bush, he was a tool and invention of Jews, therefore the 'first Jewish president'. He tried to salvage his black credentials with BLM near the end of his second term, but Michael Brown was too much of a hard sell and the craziness led to Dallas shootings of white policemen. (Of course, no one took a knee for the dead cops.)

In 2016, Hillary lost narrowly largely because the black vote wasn't out in force for her. And Biden, the favorite of the Establishment(along with Kamala), got the nomination because of black votes in the South. So, 2020 victory hinged heavily on the black vote and black complicity in election rigging. And this time, Jews felt they needed to enter into a real bidding war for black loyalty. In the past against milquetoast GOP candidates, the Democrats need not worry too much about the black vote. But there was the chance that Trump might shave off just enough black vote to push him over the top. If Jews and Democrats took the black vote for granted, they had to jealously guard it and bribe it with lavish prizes in 2020. And that's why the George Floyd and BLM thing got so out of control. Of course, Jews hate Trump because his swaggering style had an awakening effect on White America, and BLM & Floyd Cult were also to reinforce the 'white guilt' mechanism.

Anyway, as the saying goes, "Why pay for something when you can get it for free?" And that's how Jews and Democrats had come to feel about the black vote. As blacks were so resolutely pro-Democratic and anti-GOP, it didn't require much effort to keep blacks voting for the Party. Black votes were essentially free, and of course, it was even more so with Obama. Even if Obama didn't do much for blacks, his blackness had blacks voting for him as a 'bro'.
But post-Obama was like a rude awakening for blacks. They were happy to have a brotha in the White House for eight years, but when the jig was up, blacks were feeling like Janet Jackson singing, "What have you done for me lately?" Obama yrs were mostly about gentrification, more mass immigration, more globo-homo, and etc. Indeed, it seemed as if black issues were pushed to the rear in favor of not only homos but freaking trannies. Also, Obama didn't say anything about policies like Stop-and-Frisk and, if anything, mostly seemed in be in cahoots with the urban yuppie gentrifier class. In a way, all this BLM hysteria is about Jews and libby-dib elites trying to distract blacks from the fact that THEY did most to lock up record number of blacks, replace blacks with immigrants, favor globo-homo over black issues, and have the IDF teach US police a few tricks on how to control the colored folks.
Obama years to blacks were, in a way, sort of like Reagan years to True Conservatives and the Clinton years to True Liberals. Because Reagan was president for 8 yrs(and George H.W. Bush for 4 more yrs), it seemed as if Conservatism really won, but during that period, the US became more soulless and less socially conservative. And while the Clinton years seemed like the triumph of Good Ole Liberalism and boomer idealism, it was actually a time of hyper-capitalism and massive deregulation. It took the passing of the Reagan-Bush era for conservatives to finally wake up and realize nothing had been conserved. And it took the end of the Clinton Era for liberals to realize how Clinton had been the tool of the chamber of commerce and the rise of the oligarchs. And it took the end of the Obama era for blacks to wake up and realize, "Sheeeeeeeiiiit, we ain't got nothing in them eight fa**oty years."

And this explains why certain segments of the black population were receptive to Trump in 2016. Obamagic had had a sandman effect on them. They were asleep thinking a brotha was in charge when, in fact, the trends during the Obama years favored the urban yuppie class, the Wall Street oligarchs, and globo-homo types. In a way, this is the danger of having 'your guy' in office. His position creates the impression that your side is on top when, very likely, it is losing out to other forces obfuscated by the false comfort of 'your guy' being on top. Blacks felt a post-Obama funk as his presidency wound down. After Obama, blacks were no longer interested in a white leader. Also, there wasn't another black candidate around that could appeal to white voters, which were crucial to Obama's wins as a Nice Negro. Then, it's understandable why Trump's message of America First had a certain appeal to blacks who feel they themselves should be favored over immigrants, and this sentiment goes back to Booker T. Washington who appealed to American elites to end immigration and hire blacks for jobs.

So, in a long while, Jews and Democrats actually had to fight for black votes and hearts & minds. While they could rest assured that the great majority of blacks would still vote Democratic, they feared that Trump might shave off just enough black votes to win a second term. Or not enough blacks might show up to vote, which is why Covid hysteria was useful to carry out election fraud on an unprecedented scale.
Anyway, to win over blacks in 2020, Jews went crazy in the bidding war. For a long time, it was understood that the GOP wouldn't even try to win over black votes. GOP would do the bare minimum to look 'un-racist', and Democrats could be assured of the black vote. But Trump made a real play for the black vote, and this meant that the Democrats couldn't rely on the old tricks once again and rest on their laurels. They had to bid up higher and higher in the Afro-auction. Jews took no chances. What they did for Michael Brown wasn't enough. And BLM-as-movement wasn't enough. George Floyd had to be sanctified. Not merely a victim but a saint. And BLM was transformed from righteous rage to rapturous religion. Jews and Democrats pulled all the stops in showering blacks with glittering prizes.

So, if the Black Vote would have fetched $1,000 in past auctions, the bidding wars in 2020 raised it to about a million dollars. Jews did for BLM what some people did for Bitcoin. Made it rise through the roof. If Hillary had won in 2016 and if she ran for re-election against someone like Jeb Bush or Rick Santorum, none of this would have been necessary. Jews and Democrats could have rested assured that the black votes would be there. Also, it wouldn't be the end of the world if Jeb Bush or his ilk won because he's such a total wussy cuck. But Jews truly hated Trump and what he stood for, and they were willing to DO ANYTHING to unseat him. Indeed, what Jews pulled off in 2020 is like what South Korea did with the steal in the 1988 Olympics. It was obvious Roy Jones clearly won the match, but SK wanted the gold. People always knew there was corruption in the Olympics, but they thought there's no way South Korea would pull something so low, so obvious, so foul IN FRONT OF THE WHOLE WORLD. But yep, their provincial pride overrode sense and decency, and so, the steal happened right in front of eyes of the world.
Approaching 2020, many wondered what Jews would do to beat Trump. After all, they pulled all sorts of dirty tricks with 'Russia Collusion', 'Ukraine scandal', and other BS. But few people thought Jews would go totally crazy and pull off Covid nuttery and BLM lunacy just to win an election. But they did just that in front of the whole world. Jews have no sense of limits in having their way. But because Jews control the media and top institutions, they fooled just enough people and got away with it. Unlike South Korea that fooled no one, Jews were able to fool so much of the world with their utter BS. But then, even people who were not fooled nevertheless gladly went along with it because they've been led to think they're the 'best and the brightest', therefore ANYTHING is justified in wresting back control from Trump the Nazi and the Deplorables(even though the people in charge in the Trump White House were the same Israel-Firsters).

In a way, blacks have much to thank Trump. Thanks to Trump, Jews and Democrats went all in to win back the blacks. Even Covid hysteria was put aside to let BLM run riot. Blacks got both the spiritual prize as the holiest race and the material prize as they got to run wild and loot and steal. Indeed, even as their stores were being stripped clean by crazy Negroes, the 'woke' companies were singing paeans to BLM under the guidance of Jews who control the gods. The Jewish Mind uses the Black Body to attack whites, body and soul.

If not for Trump, all this attention and adulation wouldn't have been showered upon blacks. Blacks became especially precious in 2020 precisely because Jews feared that record number of blacks might vote for the Orange Man. Of course, Jews know the real truth. They know George Floyd was just a scumbag who died of drug overdose(like so many white working class), and they know Derek Chauvin is a victim of legal lynching. It's like Jews knew Russia Collusion thing was a hoax but pushed it just the same. And they attacked Trump on the Ukraine scandal because it was really ruinous to Biden, the real crook involved with regime in Ukraine installed by US-instigated coup. The real problem for Jews wasn't that Trump was 'racist' but that he came across as least 'racist', at least when it came to blacks. (When it came to Mexicans and Chinese, it was a different story.)

In a way, we see a pattern here. Jews are a 'jealous god' and didn't want Trump to take any credit. They didn't want Trump to take credit for ending the war in Afghanistan, so they delayed it... until Biden could take credit. And notice how Jews are now talking with Russians to arrive to some agreement. The very Jews who howled about Trump being a puppet of Putin are now dealing with Russia. Again, Jews didn't want Trump to take any credit in world affairs. What they shamed Trump for doing, they are doing it themselves. It's like the Kate Beckinsdale character in THE LAST DAYS OF DISCO. She says she could never date a guy in advertising but it's really to dissuade a friend from dating a guy that SHE wants. Jews will tell you not to do something, but when you choose not to, they do it and reap the rewards for themselves.

American culture and politics have devolved into a ritual of appeasing Jews, homos, and blacks. Wall Street bailouts, Wars for Israel, globo-homo mania, tranny nuttery, BLM riots, Floyd cult, and etc. This is no way to have a healthy society. But as the fish rots from the head, Jews deserve the most blame for leading America by the nose into the abyss. And yet, all we get from conzos is 'Muh Israel' and "Please don't call me 'racist-wacist'."

BIDEN'S SLEW OF JEWS - Brother Nathanael

Problems of Rush Limbaugh & the Delusions of Dittoheads — The False Dichotomy of 'Right-Wing' Capitalism vs 'Left-Wing' Socialism

Did Rush Limbaugh really make a difference?

Ironically, Limbaugh paved the way for the triumph of the New Liberals who should now be called Uberalls as they stand for Shlomo-Globo hegemony uber alles. Maybe, Limbaugh should be called a 'Limberal' given he unwittingly lent a hand to the Globerals and Uberalls in their total usurpation of power. How was Limbaugh a tool in this?

He was a total cheerleader for US corporations, 'free trade', 'private enterprise', Wall Street, Las Vegas, and money-money-money on the supposition that those are intrinsically 'conservative' forces. His was a pro-rich message though his main appeal was to the rubes. Thus, he helped create the situation of "What's the Matter with Kansas", i.e. so many American social conservatives who were have-lesses supporting policies that favored the have-mores and have-lot-mores in the mistaken belief that Big Money was on the side of Americanism.
Perhaps, Limbaugh's blind spot could be forgiven as his formative years were the Cold War when global conflict according to the US Narrative boiled down to God, Enterprise, & American Patriotism versus Godless Communism & Anti-Americanism. Also, when Rush Limbaugh was young, the face of capitalism was General Motors and good ole boys making things in factories. And the GOP was powerful in California — none other than Ronald Reagan won twice there as governor and dominated in 1980 and 1984 — , and the initial high-tech start-ups had many libertarian-leaning individuals who preferred GOP's pro-entrepreneur policies.

Limbaugh was blind, willfully or otherwise, as to how much things had changed in American Capitalism with the ascendancy of boomers(among whom Jews were especially powerful). And had he inspected matters more carefully, he would have realized that Eastern Bloc communist nations were, in more ways than one, culturally and socially more conservative than the Liberal West(that, under the power of PC, became both less conservative and less liberal, rejecting both traditional values and civil liberties in favor of the Tri-Supremacist Idolatry of Jews, Negroes, and Homos enshrined as the Holy Three). Limbaugh clung to Cold War formulations of the Left vs Right, and his continuing influence after the Cold War turned out to be corrosive. In his twilight, he warmed to Donald Trump, but it was too little too late(and besides Trump turned out to be a clown).

In the 1990s, a boomer civil war broke out between Rush Limbaugh(and Newt Gingrich) and Billy Boy Clinton(and Jews securing their position as the new ruling elites). With the defeat of George H.W. Bush, the so-called Greatest Generation's fall from power(and grace) was swift, and the boomers, biggest generation in US history, took total power(though Clinton did appoint some of the older generation). Bob Dole was useless in 1996, and the death of Richard Nixon marked an end of an era.
According to Limbaugh, Bill Clinton and his crowd represented the Radical Sixties, Socialism, and Anti-Americanism. But the real conflict wasn't about capitalism vs socialism but about trying to win over Big Capital. Under Bill Clinton, the Democrats had pretty much given up on Big Labor and fixed their gaze on Wall Street, Big Tech, and other Big Money players as the main prizes. It was as if both Limbaugh and Clinton in drag were doing lap dance for Bill Gates and the like. They were both going 'me so horny, we sucky sucky long time'.
In time, Boomer Big Money went with the Democrats, something American Conservatives were reluctant to face until the likes of Ann Coulter and Tucker Carlson finally began to gripe about traitorous Chamber of Commerce and 'woke capital'. But even now, so many American Conzos yap about 'socialism', 'communism', and blah blah. Right, the mega-billionaires of Facebook, Google, Amazon, Microsoft, Hollywood, Wall Street, and etc. are all a bunch of 'communists'. And those vain homos and trannies funded by the super-rich represent what? Leninism and Stalinism?
Bill Clinton, a sleazebag but an astute observer of human nature, understood that the rich aren't only materially greedy but morally vain and status-anxious. As long as Democratic policies were overly punitive on the wealthy, many among the rich would reluctantly stick with the stuffy-and-square GOP as the pro-business party. But once the Democratic Party became reasonably pro-business, many(even most) rich folks would come over to the Democrats(even if GOP remained more pro-business) because the Democrats control the gods and own the 'cool'. Especially with Jewish control of academia and media, the gods of the US became the Sacred Semites, Noble Negroes, and increasingly Holy Homos. As the Democratic Party was the home of most Jews and blacks, it held the moral high ground. And as Jewish Power made homos ever holier, the young generation increasingly went with the Democrats as the happy globo-homo party.

Of course, the GOP had given up 'racism' long ago, but why would blacks accept racial equality from the GOP when they can get racial sanctity from the Democrats? Some Jews, as 'Neocons', did join the GOP because it was even more pro-Zionist than the Democratic Party, but it was a matter of inches(and besides, the Neocons were merely using the GOP without offering much in return: "I eat your lunch, and I eat my lunch."). If the Democratic Party was 200% for Israel, the GOP claimed it was 210% for Israel. It hardly made a difference. Also, despite GOP's ultra-hardline support for Israel, many American Conservatives opposed or or were at least less enthused about Jewish-favored policies in the US, such as gun-banning, more mass-immigration, anti-white rhetoric, Christianity-bashing, and promotion of globo-homo. Indeed, GOP's extreme obeisance to Israel and Zionism was really a crutch, a desperate compensation for its disfavor among most Jews. If anything, it betrayed GOP's anxiety as the party of disdain among Jews. In a sane world, those attacked by Jews should attack them back, but as Jews became holy in the US, you had to praise them and seek their approval EVEN when they attacked you. As the GOP couldn't win favor from Jews on domestic issues, it went full-steroids on Israel. GOP gushed as if Jews are the very best, and yet most Jews stuck with the Democrats. If indeed Jews are the best yet most remained with the Democratic Party, didn't it imply that Democrats are morally superior? After all, it seems a happier home for the Very Best.

Anyway, as the party of the three most 'sacralized' groups(of Jews, blacks, and homos), the Democrats had a decisive moral advantage over the GOP, and this state of affairs hasn't changed after four years of Donald Trump whose message was, "I love Negroes, even as they riot and loot! I love Jews even as they ram me in the arse! And, Trannies can use women's room at Trump Tower." Rich people love money but are also anxious about their reputation, and as the Jews/Democrats controlled the gods, most rich folks moseyed on over to the Democratic Party. Besides, it was also the party of big Hollywood stars and rock stars, thus more fashionable and 'cool'. In contrast, GOP was associated with 'racist' redneck Neo-Confederate South & 'homophobes' and Nashville hillbillies. (Its moralism came down to Ann Coulter and Dinesh D'Souza yapping about how the Democrats are the 'real racists' because the KKK members were historically Democratic.) And when the Jew-run media made Trump and 'Deplorables' out to be Worse-than-Hitler and the new nazis, most rich folks(shallow and vain) wanted nothing to do with it. And the likes of Mitch McConnell and Mitt Romney know only one trick: Try to win back the rich with even more tax cuts and other cucktivities.

Limbaugh of the Cold War mentality thought that the triumph of global capitalism was synonymous with victory for conservatism against Godless Communism and leftover radicalism from the Sixties, but the success of everything he'd championed came to mean the death knell of American Conservatism(and also of American Liberalism as the current power is anything but liberal in the traditional or even radical sense). The great irony is that Limbaugh lost precisely because he won. The Big Money that he so idolized won many times over, and its power led to censorship of conservatives, deplatforming of patriots, denial of financial services to rightists, defamation of people like him, and the rise of global-gangster-fascism(as opposed to good humanist fascism). Limbaugh and the dittoheads assumed that Big Capital was at war with Big Government, and the triumph of the former would ensure more liberty, more freedom, and more patriotism. Actually, the result was the fusion of Deep Pockets and Deep State. Also, Limbaugh and his ilk hoped that Jews could be wooed over to Conservatism because Jews are rich and GOP is 210% pro-Israel(than merely 200% that the Democrats are). They failed to realize that Jews have an agenda all their own. Jews weren't looking to pick sides but take over both parties and manipulate them to Jewish supremacist ends.

In the end(and from the beginning), Limbaugh was more style than substance, and Trump turned out to be no different. For all his maverick playacting, he cared more about money, success, fame, and celebrity than integrity and truth. Though he stood up to the GOP on occasion, he was more often than not a reliable cheerleader and whore for all its destructive policies.

Could Limbaugh have made a difference? Yes, but he missed the chance. Looking back, the most prescient presidential candidate of the last fifty years was Ross Perot whose campaign took on both the GOP and the Democratic Party as the tweedle dee and tweedle dum of globalism and 'free trade'. Though Perot was far from perfect and a rather unstable personality, he was more right than wrong about the dangers posed to American sovereignty by the rise of globalism and the New World Order. Because the GOP was more invested in 'free trade' than the Democrats back then, Perot was hit harder by the Republicans. Limbaugh, a Reagan Romantic of the Cold War mindset, joined with the GOP in mercilessly mocking not only Perot's looks and personality but his warnings and policies. Rush, the attack dog of the GOP, assured all the dittoheads across the fruited plains(soon to become tutti-fruity plains) to denounce Perot and go with George H.W. Bush, 'free trade', and New World Order policies.
Thus, Limbaugh missed the boat. Another chance came with Patrick Buchanan's remarkable speech at the 1992 GOP convention where he spoke for the common man and the American Worker threatened by globalist 'free trade'. Again, Limbaugh reliably sided with the GOP and repeated all the talking points about how Walmart and the like are the wave of the future, and the American Worker had nothing to fear and nothing to lose and had everything to gain. Or, maybe they can learn to code and become big earners in High-Tech.
And of course, 'true conservatives' know that capitalists are all such swell fellows, mostly patriots and natural conservatives(or at the very least libertarians committed to small government and liberty). They would never betray the GOP for all it has done for them with lower taxes, de-regulation, and the like. Limbaugh and dittoheads were fooling themselves.

While capitalists are surely people of talent, drive, ambition, creativity, and even vision, the world of money isn't exactly one of integrity or loyalty. As it's mainly driven by materialism and status-anxiety, loyalty and integrity are the last thing on the mind of capitalists. Capitalism is useful and productive but shouldn't be the core of any meaningful identity, ideology, or value system. Like Michael Corleone says in THE GODFATHER 2, "all our people are businessmen... their loyalty is based on that..." One may admire businessmen for their ability but never mistake it for integrity.

If Limbaugh had taken a nationalist-populist stance in support of Ross Perot and Pat Buchanan, perhaps he would have been booted off 'conservative talk radio' that, more often than not, was a propaganda wing of Zionists and the GOP, much like most of so-called MSM is little more than Ministry of Information for the Democratic Party and ADL. Still, he would have been a man of integrity, and had he overcome the obstacles with a populist message, he and his following could have served as a formidable counter-force against globalism pushed not only by the GOP but the Democrats.
But, by working with the GOP to crush people like Perot and Buchanan, Limbaugh unwittingly strengthened the future Democrats who would turn out to be the main beneficiaries of 'free trade', deregulation, Big Tech monopoly, and anarcho-oligarcho-tyrannism. Limbaugh banked on the false hope that triumph of New Capital would ensure dominance of the GOP and American Conservatism. And most dittoheads fell for the myth that the power struggle was about American Capitalism & Conservatism(and Neocons & Israel) versus International Socialism & Liberalism(and all those 'Anti-Semites' eager to throw Israel under the bus) when, in fact, the real tug-of-war between GOP and the Democratic Party was for the 'hearts and minds'(or wallets and vanity) of the rich donor class.

The sad irony is that the rich capitalist oligarchic class won bigger than ever(exactly as Limbaugh and dittoheads wished), and it was this very class(especially dominated by Zio-Globalist Jews) that waged total war on American Nationalism, the white race, Christianity, and populist-conservatism. But American Conzos learned nothing. Again with Obama's win in 2008, there was more nonsensical talk about 'socialism'! True, Obama had links with certain radical figures from the Sixties, some of them Jewish, but most of them had moved on from communism to Zionist-capitalist-supremacism. (Besides, Neocons had Trotskyite backgrounds.) Wall Street was bailed out under Obama, the puppet of the Jews, and Jews got even richer when Main Street took it up the arse. And it was Big Capital that funded globo-homo and tranny-wanny nonsense. It was the capitalists who promoted 'gay burgers'. And it was the capitalists at Chick-Fil-A who, despite so much support from the conservative consumers, caved under Jewish Capitalist pressure and became Dick-Fil-Ass. And while uber-capitalist banks were shutting down accounts of conservatives and rightists, some of the biggest corporations were pumping many millions, even billions, into groups like BLM and SPLC. It was super-rich Hollywood Jews and Silicon Valley Zionists who pumped record cash into Georgia to ensure Democratic Senatorial wins. Joe Biden raised record money in 2020 thanks to Big Capital and super-rich Jews. And Big Capital conspired with the Deep State and Big Media to turn 2020 into a hellhole with Covid nonsense and BLM nuttery just to punish America for having elected Trump. So, the notion that capitalism is automatically conservative was a boomer myth, a byproduct of Cold War mentality.

But the kind of 'conservatism' set by Limbaugh and dittoheads failed to see the big picture because it was stuck on framing the world in terms of capitalism = conservatism versus socialism = liberalism. What's-the-Matter-with-Kansas was a case of "What's the matter with Limby-Dim and the Dittoheads?" Now, it's true that Limbaugh's reach and influence waned in the age of the internet, but much of the talking points remained. So, Steven Crowder the chowder-head still thinks the big enemy is 'socialism'. Andrew Torba, though laudable as founder of Gab and defender of free speech, gripes about 'communism', ROTFL. (China may be ruled by the CCP, but China gave up communism long ago... or haven't they heard? CCP today is about as Maoist as the current Democrats are Pro-Confederate and Pro-Working-Class.) And so many even in the Dissident Right speak of THE LEFTISTS. Anyone with sense would have realized long ago that true leftism is deader than conservatism, though it may not seem that way on the surface as radical 'wokeness' seem to be everywhere. But it's all just labels over trivia and trifles. Jewish supremacist capitalist-Zionism hides behind the 'leftist' label to create the false impression that its side is about 'equity' and 'justice' when it's totally about supremacism, hierarchy, hegemony, and privilege. If the Democrats are really about equal justice for all, what's with all their 'Muh Israel' catechisms and submission to Zionist Jews and total support for More Wars for Zion?

Alt Right could have introduced something new, but idiot Richard Spencer and his retardo crew decided to larp as Nazis and fall into the enemy's trap, which made it even harder for Trump to try something different.

At any rate, one thing Perot got right was going beyond the stunted worldview of left vs right. The Reform Party was a third party that appealed to both rightist and leftist sentiments. Though Nazism 2.0 turned out to be insane with its imperialism and wars, Nazism 1.0 was essentially sound precisely because it combined rightism with leftism. National Socialism was about German Pride but also about the German worker, the backbone volk of the nation. Perot instinctively understood this, and free-thinking Democrats and Republicans were willing to give him a chance.
It attempted a counter-convergence against the convergence happening within both the GOP and the Democratic Party. After the end of the Cold War, the establishment elites of both parties were converging on 'free trade', globalism, the gods of PC, and total sucking up to Jews. For all the bitterness between Billy Boy Clinton and Newt Gingrich, they were totally agreed on More for Wall Street and More for Big Money. Perot's challenge envisioned a different kind of convergence. Not among the elites but among the masses. The American People, instead of being divided by and manipulated with the false dichotomy of 'left' vs 'right', would converge as a broad mass of patriots in defense of national sovereignty and economic justice. Convergence of the people against the convergence of the elites. If not for Perot's instability and the dirty tricks played by both parties(especially by the GOP), it's possible Perot could have changed the course of US history. And Limbaugh could have been part of something truly remarkable but he opted to be the lapdog of the GOP and cheered on the Walmartians.

A third party is useless if it appeals only to one side. Another 'liberal' party will merely take votes away from the Democrats, ensuring victory for the GOP, and another 'conservative' party will shave votes from the GOP, ensuring victory for the Democrats. The only chance for a Third Party is to win over disillusioned people from both sides. Also, its message must be both left and right. After all, there is much that is good about leftism(without which Western progress is inconceivable) and much that is good about rightism(without which there is no civilizational continuity and stability). Conservatism allows for tradition, caution, and continuance. Liberalism allows for novelty, experimentation, and daring. It's like how evolution works. Without mutations, organisms would have remained the same. And yet, most mutations are harmful and must be rejected. Without leftism, there is just moribund conservatism, and many civilizations grew weak and weary as a result, like Ancient Egypt and Byzantium. The West made great leaps because of the revolutionary spirit. And yet, without the stabilizing gyrational force of conservatism, leftism can turn cancerous and crazy, mistaking every novelty as the 'most evolved' truth. Imagine an organism where the mutations take over. It will turn into Elephant Man.

Looking back on 2016, it would have been better for Trump to run as a third-party candidate. Because he ran as a Republican, he was compelled to play the 'rightist', thus needlessly alienating many people with leftist inclinations. Had he run on a combination of nationalism and socialism, he could have done so much more. Of course, had he won as a third party candidate in 2016, he would have been squeezed by both parties in Congress for four grueling years, but many more Americans would have been with him. Being alone with the people isn't the worst thing, and his tragedy would have been heroic. Instead, as a sham 'rightist' in a cucked GOP, the tragedy of 2020 was a clown-show, a farce.
Two realities decide the fate of America: JEWS CONTROL THE GODS and JEWS GIVE YOU MONEY. In the end, despite all his bluster, Rush Limbaugh bowed to the Jewish-controlled gods and took their money as Talk Radio Industry was controlled by Uber-Zionists.

RUSH - AN AMERICAN ICON