How Negrolatry or Afromania among Silly Whites parallels the Transformation of Worship from Pagan Cults to Judaism to Christianity — The Problems of White Psychristianity — Nature vs Nurture in the God-Myth

BASIC FACTS ABOUT RACE IN 13 MINUTES - American Renaissance

The history of the transition from paganism to Old Testament to New Testament is instructive in an understanding of how whites came to bow down to Negrolatry.

Though there were many kinds of paganism, the pagan gods weren't generally high on the moral scale. Some were downright cruel and murderous, like the gods of the Aztecs. Human sacrifice was also practiced by certain paganists of Ancient Near East. Pagans feared and worshiped power for power's sake. Their spiritual vision was far from moral. It was all about might. The gods were like the forces of nature. Floods, earthquakes, volcanos, drought, pestilence, and etc. Good or bad, it didn't matter. It was fearsome and frightening. Nature could be on your side or against your side. All you could hope for was good fortune. Hopefully, nature will favor you, and you had to do whatever necessary to earn those favors. As gods controlled nature(or nature = gods), you had to pay them tribute. It could even be in the form of ritual human sacrifice if indeed it was deemed the only way to placate and appease the gods. Gods were powerful. They were the forces behind or within nature. It was presumptuous of man to expect, let alone demand, that gods be moral and caring about feeble and flawed mankind. Gods were gods, super-beings of great power. And they did as they pleased, and the most mankind could hope for was easing their wrath(or direct it at enemy tribes). Maybe then, the gods won't kick your butt too badly. Maybe the gods will spare your kind and take out their fury on some other hapless tribe. Paganism was spiritual nihilism. Might was right.

Then arose the Jewish religion(as well as other religions that sought to morally justify, as well as bind, the spiritual forces). It winnowed the spiritual realm into the universe of one God. Judaism went even beyond 'holocausting' all the other gods. Instead of Yahweh prevailing over all other gods, vanquishing them into extinction, it argued there was never any other god than the one and only God. So, all other gods never existed. They were false, figment of the imagination, whereas Yahweh was the one true God from(or before the) beginning. Jewish Spirituality was a revolution in thought. At once, it elevated the conception of God to levels unknown to mankind. The Jewish God wasn't just the one and only God but the all-powerful and all-knowing God. Among pagan gods, some were more powerful than others but no god was all-powerful and all-knowing. But the Jewish God was the one supreme being. Jews made their God into a singularity, more powerful than all the other conceptions of gods combined. And yet, Jews also hamstrung their God more than any other people did. By moralizing their God as not only all-powerful and all-knowing but good and wise, the end-result was God that was allergic to the nihilistic temptation of might-is-right.

So, even though the Jewish God was more powerful than any god imagined before, He couldn't even demand that Abraham kill the kid. Sure, as the one and only God, it was His right to demand that Abraham sacrifice Isaac. But, if He'd really made Abraham carry out the blood ritual, He would have revealed Himself as no different from the pagan gods. So, the Jewish God was at once the lone superpower of the spiritual realm and morally owned by the Jews. (In a way, Jews played a similiar mind trick on the Anglos. Jews flattered the Anglos as not only the mightiest people in the world but also the noblest. Thus, Anglos were goaded into believing their great power must be morally justified, especially in Jewish eyes. Their might had to be right. Of course, what constituted 'good' in Jewish eyes was on the basis of "Is it good for Jews?" As Anglos became ever so mindful of Jewish sensitivities, their godlike power came to cuck to Jewish agendas, whereupon Jews eventually took over as the new gods.")

Even though Jews moralized spirituality and conceived of the one and only God(who is not only all-powerful and all-knowing but all-wise and all-just), God of the Old Testament retained some of the darker characteristics of the cruel pagan gods. The ever-fluctuating Jewish concept of God ranged from wise, caring, and compassionate TO cruel, ruthless, and murderous. Jewish God seemed to be kind of schizoid. Too often, His wrath seemed unbalanced and disproportionate to the crime of the wrongdoers. Or, his violence seemed arbitrary as far as the human mind could fathom.

Also, there was a seemingly insurmountable contradiction within the Jewish moral conception of God. On the one hand, Jews praised Him as the all-powerful, all-knowing, all-wise, and entirely just Deity. On the other hand, they wanted Him to favor the Jews uber alles. One interpretation of the Covenant was that Jews would be favored by God if and only if they sincerely aspired to be BETTER than other peoples. In other words, Jews would strive to be wiser, fairer, and more moral than other peoples, thereby deserving the special blessing of God. This was the kindlier take on the Covenant. But, there was another interpretation that implied God would/should favor the Jews uber alles simply because Jews got Jewish blood. At best, this was rank tribalism, and at worst a kind of supremacist nihilism.

At any rate, it was frustrating for Jews that despite the manner of their deeds, good or bad, they remained weak relative to other tribes. Was God holding back his full blessing because Jews weren't good enough? Or did God intend Jews to remain politically and militarily weak because their true destiny was to formulate a new kind of power that conquers souls with words than lands with swords? By developing their spirituality, Jews would master the art of survival despite their military setbacks. Thus, while other peoples that concentrated on physical conquest would rise to greatness with victory but fade into oblivion with defeat, Jewishness would outlast all of them because its essence was soul-bound to God regardless of victory or defeat in battle. It helped that the Jewish God couldn't be represented in idol form, which would have led to at least the symbolic desecration of His Being by the enemy's sword and hammer. It's harder to destroy a mystery than a representation. (On the other hand, mystery remains dark and anxiety-inducing.) Still, it was tough-going for Jews to be surrounded by empires far more powerful than their tribe. Even if Jews licked their wounded pride with self-assurance that they alone possessed the formula for survival and longevity, even a mere century seemed like forever to the people living in anxiety and turmoil.

When Jews prayed for the Messiah under Roman Occupation, they envisioned him to be a super-warrior-prophet who would vanquish the Romans(and all other enemies of Jews, as well as collaborator-Jews) and restore Jewish independence(and maybe even bring about Jewish hegemony). But, other Jews conceived of different possibilities, and one of these led to the birth of Christianity. In a way, the Warrior-Messiah template was fulfilled by Muhammad some 600 yrs later, but he was an Arab who, in his own way, universalized Hebraism(and its link with Hellenism via Christianity).

There has long been the Utopian dream of starting anew. A new beginning without the stain and imperfections. A kind of New Eden. Even God is tempted in this direction, as when He sent the flood to drown out the wicked so that humanity could begin again with the virtuous Noah and his family... but things went badly once again.
Some of the most radical firebrands in the modern era wanted a new beginning, a kind of Year Zero experiment. Reform and even moderate revolution weren't good enough because they tolerated too many of the Old Imperfections. Instead of eradicating all old evils and starting anew, reform took a gradualist approach upon a corrupted order and succumbed to reactionary pressures and opportunistic tendencies. Instead of cutting off the hand of the Devil, reformists shook it and contracted the disease of accommodation in the name of craven pragmatism.

Communism swore to stamp out the old and oppressive in one clean sweep and replace it with the new and just. It led to Stalinist collectivization, Maoist Cultural Revolution, and most frighteningly the Year Zero experiment in Cambodia. At the root of communist theory was the idea that one could not compromise with the Old Way. Social-Democrats were denounced for having succumbed to 'moderate' bourgeois temptations. Leninism and Maoism waged war not only on the evils of the Old but on the Old itself as an evil that must be eradicated in its entirety to make way for the New. (Granted, Classic Marxism wasn't so much an attack on the Old as on the New. It believed capitalism was doing an awesome job of eradicating the old way and making way for the new, except that its contradictions and imbalances couldn't possibly be the basis for a stable social order as too few would end up with too much at the expense of everyone else.)
The shining New Order needed not be grasped for in the dark. It was not something that would gradually come into view through trial and error, steps forwards and backwards. No, this New had already been envisioned in the mind of Karl Marx. Like Zeus's head birthed the full-grown Athena in her full glory, Marx had seen the Future, how it would happen and what it would be about. For this prophecy to be fulfilled, the Old(or the Bad New)simply had to make way for the New or the Good New(that would be premised on justice prophecy than on just profits). It wouldn't be yet another chapter in the customary historical process of the old constantly ceding to the new(which becomes the new old ceding to the new new and so on) but the end of the Old for good and beginning of the New forever. It would be the End of History and the Beginning of the Future.

But seeds of such thought were there in Christianity itself(though its Utopian vision was directed toward Heaven). It imagined God born anew. For Christians, the birth of Jesus was like spiritual Year Zero. Anno Domini. In a way, it was the human equivalent of what God had attempted with the Flood but in spiritual reverse. Mankind had proved to be a disappointment, and the Flood was meant to wipe out everyone but the good man Noah and his family so that humanity would have a new flowering without the weeds.
Likewise, God turned out to be a big disappointment for many Jews though, whereas it seemed only right for almighty God to air His grievances about man, it was unthinkable for man to do likewise about God. Why were the Jews so weak? Did God fail to live up to His end of the bargain? Or was the fault with the Jews? Besides, if Jews worship an all-wise and all-knowing God, why was the Torah so full of contradictions? Why are there so many suggestions of God's imperfections even though He is supposed to be perfect? Why does God have so many contrasting 'personalities'? How come the various great prophets disagree with one another as to the nature of God and His design for the Jews and mankind?

Of course, Jews couldn't admit that the fault was with God. They couldn't say it but they nevertheless felt it. There was something wrong with God, and there was too much contradictory and bewildering baggage in the Torah. If God failed to fix the world with the Flood and the new beginning with the good man(Noah), perhaps the answer was a new beginning with the good God. A Year Zero for spirituality. But how could Jews reject the Old God when He was the one and only God, the all-perfect and all-wise Being? That would have been blasphemous. The renegade Jews who comprised the Early Christians had an idea. How about the Son of God? Even though the Narrative is that He suffers and dies for the sins of man, the crypto-narrative could be He does penance for the sins of His Father. Such can't be said because God is supposed to be perfect. But if indeed the Old God is perfect, why a need for the Son of God as the equal of God and the founder of a new religion? Why a need for the face of God(in human form) who heretofore didn't have a face to show to mankind? Ultimately, Abram was spared from having to sacrifice his son, but according to Christianity, God had to sacrifice His Son to bring about the New Faith, the ultimate one, and the Redemption. But only of man or of God Himself as well? Upon closer examination, the Jesus Narrative is about penance of both man and God.

Via creation of the Jesus Myth, spiritual Year Zero could conceive of God without the old baggage. Unlike the Old Prophets who consulted the Jewish Tradition and History to grasp God's meanings & intentions and build upon earlier wisdom(or delusions), the new prophecy of early Christians would be written on a blank slate. The newly birthed (Son of)God could be all about love, peace, and forgiveness, conceived of only the highest virtues and in a manner far more consistent than the Old Testament narrative. He would signify the end of the Old Covenant that bound volatile God to the troublesome history of the Jews. The New Covenant wouldn't be bound to any history or custom. It would be based on Faith and purity of heart and open to all mankind. Jews were so fearful of their God. God was good and just but also ruthless and terrifying. God was a helping hand but also a clenched fist. The Messiah of Christianity had bleeding hands. Christ, having felt the fleshly pain and suffering of mankind, would understand. He would be of a bleeding heart(though not the sappy kind of the 'liberals'). Furthermore, there would be not one but two Year Zero narratives around Jesus. His birth in Bethlehem heralding a new promise and the Resurrection where He would defeat death and enter into the Kingdom of Heaven.

This way, mankind could hope for a more humane and loving God. Jews believed God existed before the world, long before the First Man, who only came into existence through the will of God. God created the world and always exerted a patriarchal and masterful authority over humanity. So, it wasn't the role of mankind or the Jews to mold God's nature. God molded them, and mankind could only hope to understand God a little better.
But with Christianity, mankind could nurse Christ-as-baby in their arms. Mankind could have a parental role over Christ as starchild. Mankind could mold Jesus in His formative years. Jesus, though God by nature, was Man by nurture. (Moses spent his formative years as an Egyptian but as a man turned full-Jew and destroyed many an Egyptian. In contrast, though Jesus would come to realize He is God than mere man, He would forever feel indebted to the good people who loved, nurtured, and taught Him.) Mankind, in imagining its role in the maturation and education of Jesus, could assure themselves that the Son of God as the new face of God would be fundamentally different from the Old God of the Torah who was unpredictable like the weather. Jesus would be more like the weatherman looking out for mankind.

Now, what can this teach us about the development of Negrolatry in the West? First, we must acknowledge that even modern secular white folks still think and feel in terms of Idolatry and 'psychristianity'. Even if no longer religious, a part of them is into idol-worship of all things thrilling & titillating(especially as modern culture is mostly about sports and youthful enthusiasm, with most people growing older not with pride of wisdom but resignation to irrelevance), while another part cannot shake off the guilt-complexes and redemption narratives inherited from Christianity that governed Europe for over a millennium. Also, Northern European Protestant types have long been craving for Idolatry or at least iconography that had been purged from their culture in rejection of semi-pagan Catholicism. At least German Protestants compensated for their lack of spiritual color with the power of music. Anglo-Protestants were especially vulnerable to the temptations of Negrolatry because of the dryly literary insistence of their culture.

From the white perspective, there are parallels between the developmental stages of Negrolatry AND the evolution of paganism into Jewish Religion and then the transformation of Judaism into Christianity, the universal faith, one that especially came to conquer/convert the white heathens of Europe. (From the black perspective, it could be they are aiming at something resembling Islam, a secular faith for whites where blacks-as-gods thrive less on kindly virtue than on fearsome power. If Black Muslims of the Nation of Islam seek racial separation[at least in theory], much of so-called Critical Race Theory or CRT is about whites worshiping and obeying blacks because blacks are good simply for being black.)

Like Ancient Religions and Cults, the crudest and most elemental forms of Negrolatry have to do with paganist fear-and-trembling before raw power, the might-is-right thing. This is Negrolatry #1. Before the emergence of higher moral/spiritual concepts and codes, mankind worshiped gods simply for their awesome power. Never mind right or wrong. Just bow down before the terrifying might that can smite your butt. No wonder so many tribes, in both Old World and New World, made human sacrifices to the gods. (Today, so many whites are willing to sacrifice so many whites and other non-blacks to appease the black gods. White victims are presented as sacrificial offerings to black thugs, criminals, leeches, and crooks via reduced sentencing or 'affirmative action'. Of course, stuff like BLM ends up killing more blacks due to reduced police presence, but the holy god of black egotism matters more than the mere flesh of black bodies riddled with bullets. This has to be seen as a kind of neo-human-sacrifice - https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/08/exclusive-lawsuit-filed-wake-forest-university-coach-killed-man-one-punch/ )

In a similar vein, Negrolatry in its most primitive form is about white awe of the bigass megaton Negro. Even in the old days when blacks were slaves in the South, whites noticed that 'dem ni**ers' could carry heavy loads and holler up a storm while picking cotton. It's like Ancient Folks held powerful animals in awe and even worshiped them: Hippos among Egyptians, bulls among Persians, and etc. Negro was beastly, and even though high spirituality is at the opposite spectrum of beastliness, spirituality initially grew out of worship of beastly power. Even as gods and God evolved into higher spiritual/moral conceptions, they could never lose the element of great power if they were to hold sway over mankind; indeed, the Jesus Narrative couldn't have become a religion without the Resurrection Myth as His Death would have signified ineffectiveness than the triumph of goodness. History of both man and god(s) is about power turning good than good gaining power. Power is always the first consideration. Most people admire bad power over good weakness, though they wish for the good-and-powerful. Admiration is reserved first for power, and then comes the wish for power to be just.

It's like the crude gods preceded the more complex gods in Greek mythology. It's like refined fuel originates from crude oil. And so much of pop music, despite their complexity and sophistication, draw their core energy from wailing/hollering blues and the like.
So, even though civilized white man considered black slaves to be of a beastly lesser race, that very beastliness also impressed the white man for its raw prowess. So, on some subconscious level, white man felt about the Negro like a primitive tribe about a volcano. It's like modern man, for all his collective power and dominion over nature, still feels a certain awe when pondering a bear, lion, rhino, elephant, or killer whale. Or a hurricane or earthquake. And kids feel awe about dinosaurs, especially the T-Rex.

But just like Jews moralized spirituality from a might-is-right cult to a right-is-might faith, there was another side to white man's formulation of Negrolatry. This was the foundation of Negrolatry #2. White do-gooders wanted to regard black soulfulness as akin to spiritual grace. Blacks in the South were like Jews in bondage in Egypt. They needed a Moses to lead them to the Promised Land. This Moses figure could be black(like Frederick Douglas and later MLK) or white(John Brown or Abraham Lincoln). The beastly was idealized as priestly. According to Negrolatry #2, blacks loved to sing-and-dance not because they are a bunch of savage jive-ass bunners but because their hearts are bursting with passion for freedom, equality, and dignity.
White folks, especially of Abolitionist bent, projected their own dreams and hopes onto the Negro. These Northern folks had little first hand knowledge of the jivers and their ghastly racial nature. But they knew a lot about the Bible and projected Biblical narratives upon the Negro. Of course, the South also consulted the Bible to justify slavery. They said Ham saw his father Noah naked, and God punished him by turning him into a Negro condemned to slavery under other races.
Jews, yet to develop a universalist mentality that came with 'emancipation' of their own(in Europe), were okay with the Southern explanation as to why blacks should pick cotton for whites(and Jews). It was because Ham saw Noah naked. But the fanatical Christian Abolitionists in the North weren't satisfied with Old Testament explanations alone. They were into sanctimony and holier-than-thou-ness. And what better way to feel piety and self-righteousness than by denouncing slavery, especially of the Noble Negro? UNCLE TOM'S CABIN even has a Noble Negro as christ-like figure dying for the sins of white folks. Of course, sympathy for the Negro had an element of condescension as well. Many Northern whites thought it was bad enough to be Negro with dark skin, nappy hair, and fat lips. Why make it worse for such an unfortunate people by using them as slaves as well? Also, many whites in the North thought blacks would always remain childlike dependents and sidekicks of the white race. They had no idea they were lighting a powder keg full of gunpowder.

But UNCLE TOM'S CABIN notwithstanding, whites weren't ready to confer unto the Negro the role of Christ in the American Narrative between the Civil War Period to the Civil Rights Era. Rather, the road from slavery to freedom was deemed akin to the Exodus story, albeit one led by white saviors or White Moses, especially in the figure of Abe Lincoln. Whites, especially the do-goody types in the North, wanted to believe that Negroes had noble souls and would be grateful and use their freedom wisely. Many whites in the South thought otherwise for reasons of firsthand knowledge and/or prejudice. While many were bigoted against blacks for racial reasons, they also instinctively sensed that Negroes could abuse their newfound freedom by terrorizing white folks in a reversion to oogity jungle nature.

This phase of Negrolatry lasted roughly from the Civil War to the Civil Rights Movement. The latter made a difference in that MLK took on the mantle of Black Moses who would fulfill the unfinished project of the White Moses Abraham Lincoln. But, his death turned him from a dead moses to resurrected christ. Negro Narrative went from a struggle for freedom to stairway to heaven.

But then, there is a reason why whites so desperately cling to the Cult of the Black Christ or Blackrist. It somewhat akin to why some Jews deviated from the Old Religion to formulate a new one that became Christianity. God of the Jews seemed at once unstable and tempestuous AND indifferent and uncaring. He could suddenly send floods, pestilence, and disasters out of the blue. Or He could be silent and distant just when the Jews need Him most. The Jews who would become the Early Christians wanted a more consistent and principled God. Also, they wanted to feel His nearness and what better way than by imagining Him as the Son of God who lived among mankind, died, and was resurrected to be one with the Father, God Himself. It was more soothing to believe in the Christian God. While the God of Judaism was a high concept God, the Torah's spiritual vision spanned the development of gods from might-is-right to right-is-might, which is why God in the early part of the Old Testament resembles the deities of the frightful pagans. He even makes a pagan-like demand on Abraham to make a blood-sacrifice of his son, only to 'change' His mind at the last minute. Thus, God presented Himself to Abraham as a moral God. Even so, God in later parts of the Old Testament never quite shed the vestiges of terrifying pagan gods. One can never be certain with the Jewish God, as Job found out the hard way. Then, it's no wonder that certain Jews dreamed of the Year Zero God, the one who could be conceived almost from scratch with only the good qualities minus the torrid and terrifying aspects in the Torah.

There is a parallel between the renegade alt-Jews(who became the early Christians) and today's whites who dream of a Better-Blackness. They've been enthralled with black prowess and associated it with the Noble Negro Narrative... but blacks by and large haven't conformed to the Narrative, remaining ignoble or 'nignoble'. While black problems have been a tenaciously cursed element of American History, blacks were more or less kept in 'their place' until the 1960s. The South had Jim Crow laws. And the North had its own subtler means of keeping whites over here and blacks over there. There were all sorts of discrimination against blacks in the North and the West. Jews in Hollywood had their own ways of keeping the lid on blacks.
Because of white social pressures and political muscle, blacks had no choice but to at least pretend to be a 'credit to their race'. Of course, plenty of blacks were louts and thugs. Norman Podhoretz's essay on the Negro Problem shows that, even before the Civil Rights Movement and the riotous 60s, black thugs had been harassing, beating, and robbing non-blacks, Jews included. Still, white society, both liberal and conservative, had been overwhelmingly on the side of preserving white spaces denied to blacks and dealing with blacks as second-class citizens or a can-of-worms to be kicked into the future. With such odds stacked against them, blacks couldn't go totally crazy, and whites in their safe white spaces could cling to the dream of the Noble Negro doing his best and in need of white sympathy and support. The Civil War Narrative held that blacks were freed and were on the gradual path to equality and justice. It would take time but blacks would eventually reach the Promised Land. But the Civil Rights Narrative spun a counter-argument. The Emancipation had been betrayed and the Negro had yet to break free. White Moses Abe Lincoln failed, and black Moses MLK would finally finish the job and make it to the mountaintop and lead his people to milk-and-honey.

Given the actual nature of the Negro, race-ist white skeptics had reasons not to fall for the Dream. But America is nothing if not naive and idealistic in some stupid(and inspired) way. Also, most skeptics were too genteel and inhibited to spell out in graphic and grisly details as to why the Negro Experiment wouldn't work. For some reason, White America chose to forget all about Jack Johnson and propped up the cult of Joe Louis, the nice BROWN(than black) Bomber. Apparently, Louis was such a nice guy, and it was only by accident that he knocked out all those white guys who just bumped into him. It was like the 'bum of the month' was really a 'bump of the month'. He didn't want to do it, but those clumsy uncoordinated white guys were haplessly walking into his fists and falling down.
As the raw truth remained unsaid even by the race-ists, white dreamers got the upper hand with the Narrative. The Dream would be MLK would finish the job and at last America would fulfill its mission. Of course, many chose to believe the mission was derailed by the assassination of MLK, but in fact, race problems got out of control while he was alive. Massive riots broke out in 1965, three years before MLK's death and by 1968, many blacks weren't even heeding King's advice and getting more rowdy-radical.

Because of the moral-spiritual investment of so many white folks(especially the wiberals) in the Noble Negro Narrative, they were willing to make excuses for mounting black rage and violence. After all, you can't make an omelet without breaking a few eggs. And hadn't whites also rioted in the past? So, maybe it was black people's turn to rebel and turn over the apple cart. But the difference was that, while white folks made even more progress upon gaining freedom(via means violent or peaceful), black folks got even worse with more freedom. It was as if blacks-and-freedom was like drinking-and-driving. Freedom inspired white people to shoot for the stars. Freedom drove black people to dive for the mud.

In time, even do-good wiberals joined the White Flight. Jews joined the Jew Flew. (And Asians joined Chu-Too, and Mexicans did Brown-Not-Stick-Around.) It was getting ever harder to maintain the Noble Negro Narrative. White Flight was the result of Black Blight. Too much crime, too much craziness, too much ghastliness. And for those in the know, Abraham Lincoln actually had little sentimentality about blacks. His idea of playing White Moses was to lead blacks OUT of America. And MLK, for his all hammy but inspiring oratory, was a lout, punk, thug, and beast. Had he lived, he would have become just another Jesse Jackson... or worse a kind of Al Sharpton. Indeed, most Civil Rights Era blacks became crooks, thieves, and/or charlatans. It was his death that led to the myth of the Blackrist.

Now, if whites had sense and shook off the Noble Negro Narrative for good and saw the Real Negro at last, there would have been no more of this nonsense. But mental habits die hard, especially when the Jewish-controlled Media and Academia have been doing everything to elevate MLK into god-status and instill whites from cradle with Negrolatry. For most white young ones, the four most sacred people are MLK, Harriet Tubman, Oprah, and Obama. White parents have been made anxious about their kids becoming 'racist' at the age of three. According to Jewish Media, white kids have a natural inclination to turn 'racist'. It's almost as if the 'original sin' of 'racism' is hard-wired into the white DNA. Therefore, white parents must train their kids to be 'anti-racist' from the earliest age possible, and that means feeding them Negrolatry from the cradle.
So, most white kids come to awareness believing that any pro-white consciousness is evil while any pro-black consciousness is sacred. Stuff like Diversity-Inclusion-Equity training is not about instilling and/or reinforcing the same virtues of diligence, honesty, integrity, courage, and responsibility on ALL people regardless of race but about conflating goodness with certain identities. Being black, Jewish, or homo/tranny makes one automatically good, and the less fortunate groups without magic identities can only attain a measure of goodness by being especially partial to Jews, blacks, and homos/trannies. In other words, it's a total perversion of morality. Jews, blacks, and homos/trannies are good even if they act bad because their identities are 'good'. In contrast, even whites who are most diligent, honest, conscientious, and courageous are morally suspect because their identity is associated with all sorts of evils and failings throughout (selective)history. Instead of promoting 'diversity, inclusion, and equity'(or DIE) among whites(but then notice how this never calls for Jewish Guilt and Atonement for the mistreatment of Palestinians who are certainly NOT INCLUDED in the American Debate), society would do much better to promote accountability, appreciation, honesty, and humility among blacks. What US needs is not DIE but AAHH.

So, despite all the troublesome facts about blacks, whites cannot shake their 'psychristian' complexes about them. And yet, it's hard going to keep up with the pretense of the Noble Negro in a world where blacks act so ignoble. White people want to believe that black fevers of the soul, passion, and even rage are essentially driven by righteous hunger(or lust) for justice and goodness. It's like the Jews in the Old Testament are far from perfect but more blessed than other races because they got God on their side. Also, even though the Old Testament God is sometimes terrifying and unpredictable, He is the source of all that is good, as well as ultimately the great redeemer. And yet, the rise of Christianity suggest that enough Jews could no longer accept the anxiety-inducing uncertainties of the Old Narrative. Given the dire events of history, certain Jews agonized and strove for a new explanation, the Year Zero option where they could conceive of God from near-scratch.

We see something similar in the Third Phase of Negrolatry, that of the Blackrist. This is Negrolatry #3. Is it any wonder that so many whites have adopted black babies? Just like God was conceived anew through the narrative of Jesus as Baby God, molded and nurtured in part by man(and woman), white folks dream of the black starchild by way of white nurture. Negroes may be noble and all, but they are too fearsome and unstable, often scaring white folks half-to-death. So, how about if they adopt a black child and mold him to be the Noble Negro more in harmony with white fantasies? Just like the rise of Christianity tamed God into a more loving figure with a closer ear to man's problems, the cult of Blackrist seeks to 'fix' the problem of the broken Noble Negro Narrative. If blacks left to their own devices cannot live up to the Dream, whites must somehow intervene and replace the Old Negro with the New Negro.
Some do it by adoption, but it's also done by ACOWW or Afro-Colonization of White Wombs. Thus, the white woman carries the Noble Negro seed, much like Mary carried Jesus in her womb. Unlike a Negress who, though 'naturally noble', is too wild and funky for motherhood, the white woman would birth and nurture the mulatto kid to conform to the White Dream of the Noble Negro. No wonder so many whites greeted Obama as akin to black jesus. He was birthed by a white mother and raised by whites.
Another way is by Mass Immigration of Africans. Europeans have Noble Negro cult of their own. They believe America failed the blacks who turned out criminal and violent ONLY because of white tyranny and oppression traumatized the Negro soul. In contrast, Europe would welcome black Africans and treat them nice and show the world how naturally noble the blacks are. It's a variation on the Year-Zero-Negro, or Year Zegro. Europeans feel that American blacks became problematic solely due to mistreatment. It's like believing a tiger in captivity is dangerous because of abuses suffered at the hands of its owner and convincing oneself that a tiger would make the most wonderful pet if treated nice from infanthood. While it's true that a well-trained tiger raised from cub-hood can be friendly with humans, it can never be a proper pet because its very nature is wild & predatory and, furthermore, it is many times stronger than man.

Of course, there is one big difference between the transformation of God from the Old Testament to the New Testament and the transformation of Noble Negro Narrative from Troublesome Black Moses to Transcendent Black Christ. Whereas God isn't real whether one believes the Jewish version or the Christian version, blacks are all-too-real. There are tens of millions of them in the US, millions of them now in Europe, a billion of them in Africa, and there will be billions more in decades to come. Even though idea of God is a powerful concept, maybe the most powerful ever, it is still a matter to be pondered and debated. God doesn't exist in the real world. So, whether one is 'right' or 'wrong' about God, it is really a matter of theory.

In contrast, being wrong about Negroes is dangerous(and maybe fatal for Western Civilization) because countless blacks exist in reality and in ever increasing numbers, and they are by far the most aggressive, destructive, and dangerous race. Turning Negrolatry #1 into Negrolatry #2 was a big mistake. Whites noticed the raw power of blacks in muscle & music and conflated them with morality. Jack Johnson was about might-is-right, or 'we blacks be badass cuz we whup you white boys'. Upon noticing this fact, whites should have done everything to bring about permanent racial separation. But whites went with the cult of Joe Louis: the Nice Negro who uses his power as a credit to his race; he beats whites but is almost apologetic about it and, above all, wants to be liked by whites and be an American Hero in service of patriotism. But that Narrative fell apart in the 60s when blacks gained full confidence to riot and loot and scare whitey half-to-death.
But instead of waking up from the nightmare-mistaken-as-dream, whites ended up reaching for Negrolatry #3, whereby they came to fantasize about reinventing the Negro in their mind's eye. So, how did the Obama thing turn out? How are all these black kids created either by ACOWW and/or adoption turning out? Colin Kaepernick anyone? Is he the blackrist?

Can whites ever wake up? Perhaps not because of the 'viscerality' of black advantages. Jared Taylor detailed how blacks are better at certain things(like basketball) while Asians have their own niche advantages(like math and science). So, why can't people accept that blacks are better with balls and worse with ballpens? After all, most white people don't expect Asians to be good at basketball because they are better in math. White people aren't upset with Asian underperformance in America's most popular sports, and that's okay. So, why are whites upset with blacks not exceling in everything? Why not just say Asians are better at math and blacks are better at running/jumping? if whites can accept Asian inferiority in basketball, why not accept black inferiority in calculus or physics?

It is because math/science isn't visceral or exciting. In school, all the attention is on athletes, not on mathletes(even though the latter generally do better in life). So, the fact that Asians are good in math doesn't generate much excitement or convulsion about them. They are just seen as nerds.
In contrast, sports is visceral, and black dominance leads to white hero-worship of blacks as demigods or titans. Thus overwhelmed by excitement, whites have come to wish the best of their hero-race of blacks. (Likewise, white obsession with Jews has less to do with Jewish wizardry in math and science than their humor, forceful personalities, and prophetic reach that seem 'sexy'. Ayn Rand was no looker but her powerful big-think won over lots of acolytes.) This goes to show that Rationalism was bound to fail.

The perverse thing about the Cult of George Floyd is it managed to fuse Negrolatry 1, 2, 3 into a single package. He was beastly, a career thug, criminal, and druggy. He even had a stint in pornography. His fearsome beastly prowess made him like one of the crude pagan gods of dark nature. Negrolatry #1. But the Noble Negro Narrative spun his biography into something like a one-man exodus story. You see, he wasn't simply a lifetime criminal wandering across America to rob and cause more havoc. No, he was on a spiritual journey of self-discovery, in search of his milk-and-honey in a land mired in 'systemic racism'. A lone black moses in the tradition of the fugitive slaves on the run for freedom and dignity. Negrolatry #2. (Never mind Floyd was a free man and used his freedom badly. On the one hand, the Negrolators say it was a great evil to deny blacks equal rights and freedom in the past. On the other hand, Negrolators seem to imply that blacks + freedom is a bad mix because historical traumatization culturally or epigenetically drove blacks to be angrier and more dangerous; therefore, we can't expect blacks to use their freedom as sensibly as whites and non-blacks.) But then, Floyd died one day. How and why? He imbibed too much fentanyl, but the Jewish-controlled media and their minion-disciples, in a perverse variation of the feat pulled off by renegade Jews(who turned Jesus' tragedy into triumph), created the magic-myth of how Saint George Floyd was murdered by a 'white supremacist' centurion but overcame defeat and death by rising to heaven and gaining his place in the firmament. Thus, Floyd became blackrist. Negrolatry #3. We sure do live in crazy times.

COMING UP | THE GREAT DEBATE: E. MICHAEL JONES VS. JARED TAYLOR - Guide to Kulchur

The Facts of WHAT Is Happening vs the WHY of Deep State Motives — Don't Waste Good Facts on Bad Faith — People of Power Know the Truth but Pretend Otherwise for Power or Opportunism

There's been lots of talk of Who/Whom, but it also comes down to What/Why, or one mustn't lose sight of the WHY in the blindsided pursuit of the WHAT. Of course, we need to nail down the WHAT, the facts of what's really happening. But, in focusing solely on the WHAT, there's the risk of overlooking the bigger problem of the WHY, or why do the elites who know the what(of what's really happening) keep pretending they don't know and push the big lie? Why the Lie?

People like Heather MacDonald, Colin Flaherty(of "White Girls Bleed A Lot"), and Paul Kersey of SBPDL have detailed ad infinitum on the WHAT of black crime and social pathologies. They said it over and over and over and backed it with facts caught on video, recorded in statistics, and/or reported by local news. So, there is no way the elites don't know the WHAT. They know. And blacks who live in the black community know the WHAT as well. They know most blacks are killed by blacks. And black leaders/elites know this too, the WHAT. (By the way, the police doesn't seem to appreciate support from conservatives because Jews control the gods. Police are people too and therefore affected by Jewish controlled media and academia; so, despite what they see on a daily basis, they too regard blacks and 'progressives' more highly than 'racist' conservatives. So, no matter how much conservatives support The Blue, the Blue feels disgruntled of being associated with 'bigotry' and 'racism' said to be rife on the Right.)

If indeed the problem of the elites were ignorance and naivete, we could concentrate on the WHAT and keep hammering the nails of facts in the hope that the ruling elites will finally realize the truth of what's really happening. But over the years, no amount of speaking the truth has done any good. The elites keep favoring lies over truth.
There is no way Jews don't know about the black reality. They saw what happened to New York from the 1960s to the early 1990s. And, there's a good reason why Israel especially doesn't want black migrants; Zionists know Africans are problematic. Jews know blacks are more muscular, aggressive, and impulsive. In private conversations among themselves and with goyim they trust, Jews will admit that 80% of America's problems owe to blacks. (They'll also admit Jews control the media.) So, they know privately but will not admit publicly. And when individual Jews enter media or government, they never speak the truth even though they know certain things to be absolutely true.

So, at some point, we need to obsess less on the WHAT and focus more on the WHY. And on that score, David Duke(despite his checkered past) is actually better than most figures on the so-called Dissident Right. Dr. Duke, though kooky in certain respects, directs the focus on the fact of Jewish Supremacist Power and explains the WHY of the Jewish Lie. Duke knows the problem with the Jews and the cucked goy elites is not ignorance but malignance. Jews are for total power, and they regard Black Magic as an effective way to bait whites with 'white guilt' and hook them with jungle fever.

DAVID DUKE: FACTS OF JEWISH SUPREMACY AND JEWISH RACISM AGAINST WHITE PEOPLE

Indeed, the Jewish Media and Elites are not suffering from the Big Ignorance but willfully indulging in the Big Lie because what matters most to them is money, power, prestige, and control than truth and justice. Jews value blacks as money-makers in sports and music industries controlled by Jews. Jews value black history/slavery as a gold mine of 'white guilt' that paralyzes white pride and agency, thereby turning whites into cuck-slaves of Jews and their allies, especially blacks and homos. Jews value black muscle to emasculate the white man into cuck-maggotry, thus rendering him even more servile. This way, the white man is cucked in both morality and manhood.

Also, by having holy blacks as allies, Jews can prevent the formation of the Black-Palestinian Alliance. Why was MLK so valuable to Jews? Because, even as MLK championed racial equality in the US, he supported Jewish Supremacism in Palestine/Israel. He became holy for his struggle for justice in America but was also allied with Zionists. Thus, Jews could push the political equation: Equal Justice = Support for Israel.
Mandela was a trickier matter for Jews because Israel was South Africa's #1 ally whereas ANC was allied with PLO. But of course, Jews hedged their bets. Even though rich Jews worked with Afrikaners against the black majority and even though Apartheid South Africa and Zionist-Supremacist Israel were joined at the hip, there were also Jewish Communists like Joe Slovo who bet on the Black Horse in South Africa. So, when Apartheid finally ended, Jews could say to blacks, "You see, we Jews were on your side." And Jews funneled so much cash to Mandela that he became chummy with Israel despite the fact that it had supported the Apartheid Regime and practices a far more brutal form of apartheid in the West Bank and Gaza. Of course, Jews must pay off blacks, and this isn't cheap, but then, Jews rake in so much money from black sports/music that the whole operation pays for itself.

It is time to focus less on the WHAT and more on the WHY. Indeed, the Power is mostly about the WHY than the WHAT. If we ponder the WHY, it's obvious why the Power so often prefers the Lie over the Truth. The Power is all about maintaining its grip, and more often than not, the truth is usually more damaging to the Power. It's like Elizabeth Holmes and other creeps at Theranos knew all about the WHAT, that they were pushing a fraud. So, WHY did they do it? Because they wanted the investments, profits, and adulation. No amount of facts would have convinced Holmes who only cared about How to serve the Why. Holmes was ultimately about her idolatrous apotheosis as the female Steve Jobs than about truth, health, saving lives, and etc. It was all about egotism. Likewise, the Sackler Family didn't care about all those dead white goy lives, which were expendable. Sackers surely knew that opioids were devastating white working class Americans. But they didn't care as long as they got the money, and with that money, they could buy moral prestige as famous philanthropists of the arts and good works.

Then, it's so easy to understand the WHY of Black Lives Matter. We can detail the WHAT of black crime and how BLM is built on a pack of lies, but BLM doesn't care about facts because it is really motivated by ethnocentrism of black self-worship. Blacks, like Jews and Homos, are perfect and never to be blamed. In the Bible, God is perfect and whatever He does or whatever happens can NEVER be blamed on Him. The blame must always fall on systemically sinful humanity. In our secular age, Jews control the gods, and the three holies are Jews, blacks, and homos. We must revere them as near-perfect, and so, even when bad things happen around them due to their bad behavior, the fault is not with them but with us for having failed them. So, if blacks loot and burn down cities, it is no fault of their own but their righteous punishment and smiting of us who didn't work hard enough to create a social order worthy of their divine presence.

Indeed, the fact that blacks, Jews, and progs resort to yapping about 'systemic racism' is they know BLM is factually unsound. The statistics invalidate BLM as facts tell another story: Too many blacks kill other blacks and non-blacks as well. So, to justify BLM, they frame the protests, riots, and vandalism in the larger perspective of the history and 'systemic racism'. Using this logic, anyone can justify anything. I can rob & steal and justify my crime as a rebellion against 'systemic oppression' since most of history has been about the powerful exploiting the powerless. I can invoke Cain & Abel and justify whatever I do as a rebellion against the sinfulness of humanity, i.e. since all of humanity has been so brutal and dark, I must be too in order to 'survive'.
It's a general rule that people invoke 'heaven' and make highfalutin claims because facts on the ground go against them. If a black steals from you, the facts favor you and incriminate the black. So, the black invokes HISTORY to justify his deed: "Heaven's on my side, so whatever I do, no matter how devilish, has the blessing from above." (Hunter Biden, Jussie Smollett, and BLM thugs all have one thing in common. In an order where Jews control the gods, them three stooges got new heaven on their side, so whatever they do can't be wrong.)
Any factual investigation of the Jewish-Palestinian Conflict will favor Palestinians, a wholly innocent people who did ABSOLUTELY NOTHING but were driven off their lands by Jewish Immigrant-invaders backed by Western Imperialists and even the Soviet Union. Since facts of the matter favor Palestinians, Jews invoke the Big History of the Holocaust to justify the theft. Never mind Palestinians had nothing to do with WWII or the Shoah, and furthermore, Israel was created AFTER the defeat of Nazi Germany, which means Jews no longer faced extermination in Europe. In the modern era, Jews won the war of worming-heaven with serpent's eggs of the new trinity of Jew-hova, Homo-mania, and Afrotheosis.

BLM is like a holy war, and it has no use of facts or moral consistency, but then, the same could be said of the Crusades. Christianity is about love, peace, forgiveness, and pacifism. Jesus never told anyone to pick up swords and fight wars and build empires built on skulls. So, why did the Crusaders and later European Imperialists wave the banner of Jesus while carrying out massive acts of violence that clearly went against Jesus's teachings? Because they were really about power and pride than anything else. They didn't care about the WHAT of their deeds. Factually, they were acting against Jesus's teachings. But, it didn't matter because they were into power, glory, wealth, and prestige. So, Jesus mattered less as teacher than as symbolism. He was used to bless and sanctify the power and wealth of the West. This way, Westerners could go around the world conquering, plundering, slaughtering, and pillaging. As long as they carried the banner and cross of Jesus wherever they went, they could make believe they were the holy warriors of justice and love.
BLM works much the same way. Blacks are most obsessed with pride and power that count for more than any actual black lives. Just like dead soldiers are the price for victory and glory, more dead blacks due to BLM are the worthy cost of something better: Negro godhood. More dead blacks are just casualties of a righteous war as far as many blacks are concerned. This is especially true of black elites as they won't be the ones doing the dying. From where they're perched, they will have gained immense prestige thanks to BLM sacralization of the Negro. (By the way, if blacks don't care about More Dead Blacks, why should the Dissident Right make a fuss about the actual WHAT? Why should they counter BLM with real-black-lives-matter that despairs of how BLM-led policies have led to more deaths among blacks? If blacks don't care about their actual dead and, furthermore, hate and attack your kind, the LAST THING you should be doing is worrying about more dead blacks.)

But then, ADL, AIPAC, and SPLC operate much like BLM. They are controlled by people who secretly know the WHAT. They are no dummies or ignoramuses. They know the truth about black criminality. They also know the facts of how Jews stole land from the Palestinians and are ruthlessly plotting to wreak more havoc in the Middle East to ensure Jewish-Zionist supremacism. Those reasons are WHY they do what they do. As the WHAT undermines their WHY, they use their near-monopoly of media and institutions to push the Big Lie.

Why does the Jewish-controlled Deep State operate as it does? Now, when it comes to small matters, the FBI probably does really good work. There's sure to be far less politics involved in going after lesser crooks and criminals. But higher up the FBI, the issue of justice becomes intermeshed with the ways of power. People-of-Power or POP don't want the justice to apply to them, and as they buy the politicians who appoint the top heads of FBI, CIA, and other elite institutions, the upper echelons of the Deep State operate solely on the HOW to serve the WHY than on the facts of the WHAT. Indeed, why is it that Jonathan Pollard was released and allowed a hero's welcome in Israel? How come Arnon Milchan can walk around freely in the US and serve as king-maker when he admitted to stealing nuclear secrets for Israel? Where is the FBI and the CIA?

It's possible that many in the Dissident Right prefer to discuss the WHAT than the WHY because it's less risque. By hammering on the WHAT, they can pretend that the Power is simply ignorant, benighted, or clueless. So, they go on and on with statistics like number-crunchers. They are little more than social accountants. They don't want to deal with the WHY because they would have to focus on Jewish Power and explain why the Jews who know the truth willfully push the lie to maintain their control and power. Going there, one would be accused of 'antisemitism' and worse. But, this is dishonest and even cowardly. No matter how much truth you speak, you are dishonest if you keep pretending that the enemy simply doesn't know when, in fact, you damn well know that he damn well knows but is willfully pushing the lie for power-sake.

Suppose there is Bob and Bill. Bill keeps letting the pitbull out, and it attacks Bob. So, Bob explains to Bill that pitbulls are dangerous and can hurt people real bad; therefore, Bill should stop letting the pitbull out. Now, Bob would be right to speak the truth to Bill if indeed Bill didn't know that pitbulls are dangerous. That way, there's a good chance that Bill will realize the truth and no longer let the pitbull out.
But, suppose Bill lets the dog out repeatedly and Bob gets attacked over and over. By this point, it should be obvious to Bob that Bill knows that pitbulls are dangerous, is feigning ignorance and willfully letting it out for the express purpose of having Bob attacked and bloodied. But if, after so many attacks, Bob is still discussing the WHAT of the dangers posed by pitbulls than redirecting his focus on the WHY of Bill's viciousness and sadism, he is pretty useless regardless of the facts he lays out. He can gather all the facts and statistics about pitbulls and lay them at Bill's feet, but Bill will keep letting the pitbull out to attack Bob because the WHY that really motivates him is to see Bob get hurt and humiliated.

It's like the scene in Federico Fellini's AMARCORD. The student is feigning ineptitude just to mock the teacher in front of the class. The teacher's earnest effort is all for naught in face of motivation whose sole purpose is to make him look ridiculous. Too many on the Dissident Right are earnestly arguing with bad faith actors. Don't waste good facts on bad faith.

So, whether it's BLM or the bogus War on Terror, we need to focus less on the WHAT of the facts and more on the WHY of Jewish Power(without whose media-and-money-support, BLM wouldn't be possible). At this point, an honest assessment of the political psychology of Jewish Power and the Deep State will be more useful than all the facts and data we can stack up. Indeed, Juliann Assange and Edward Snowden can tell you that. What did they do but reveal the facts and raw data of how the Deep State really operates? They were titans of the WHAT. So, how did the Deep State and Jewish Power react to this mountain of facts? They did everything to cover it up and destroy the lives of whistle-blowers. It's because the Deep State isn't about truth or justice but about the Power guarding its power to do as it pleases. The WHY directs the Deep State to focus on the HOW to keep the power than any other consideration. So, less about What's Happening than Why Is It Happening.

White Folks and Their Fascinating/Exasperating Submission to Negro as Id and Superego

https://www.simplypsychology.org/psyche.html

What is the id?
The id is the primitive and instinctive component of personality. It consists of all the inherited (i.e., biological) components of personality present at birth, including the sex (life) instinct – Eros (which contains the libido), and the aggressive (death) instinct - Thanatos. The id is the impulsive (and unconscious) part of our psyche which responds directly and immediately to the instincts. The personality of the newborn child is all id and only later does it develop an ego and super-ego.

The superego's function is to control the id's impulses, especially those which society forbids, such as sex and aggression. It also has the function of persuading the ego to turn to moralistic goals rather than simply realistic ones and to strive for perfection.
The superego consists of two systems: The conscience and the ideal self. The conscience can punish the ego through causing feelings of guilt.

Why are white psyche and white ‘physiche’(the psychology of physicality) so chained to and slavish before the Negro?

Part of the problem is blacks have come to represent both the Id and the Superego(or SuperNegro) among white folks.

1. Blacks as Id.

Because blacks are wild, expressive, colorful, and ‘vibrant’/violent, many white folks(and other non-black folks, be they Asian, Muslim, Mexican, or Hindu) look to blacks to express what is repressed, restrained, or relatively lackluster(or 'lame') within themselves. So, a ‘bland’ and ‘generic’ proggy white girl may listen to Tina Turner, Beyonce, or Rihanna and feel her own inhibited sexuality & angst expressed through the less inhibited Negress’ shamelessly lascivious performance. It's like Jungle Therapy. Because the ‘white bread’ girl hasn't the sheer intensity of vocality, personality, and temperament to express her own sensual desires and natural drives so aggressively and nakedly, she identifies with the propulsive Negress as shaman-medium for her overly tamed and civilized whims and limbs. Because it comes naturally for the Negress to act wilder and nastier, she serves as a kind of Negro-electro-amplifier for the emotions of the white woman that simply cannot charge up to that level of hyper-funky-dynamism.

Among white males, there is a vicarious Negro-for-a-Day thrill in watching black athletes dominate the field because black male-athletic prowess leaves the white kind in the dust. Blacks can run faster, jump higher, dodge better, punch harder, and etc. So, a white guy, brown feller, and yellow boy may look to the Negro as the most potent purveyor of the Global Male Id. In any local high school, the top athlete serves as the idol of manhood in the community. In the global community, the victorious Negro has become the idol of manhood for all the world. As white manhood and especially Asian manhood have been degraded by comparison, white men are increasingly moving into cuck mode and Asian men are moving into pussy-boy mode. When whites in lived their own world and favored local heroes, white people could have white heroes. Consider a movie like CHARIOTS OF FIRE. And when Japan was closed off to the world, it has its local native heroes as top samurai swordsmen and sumo champions. But in global open competition, local/national heroes are easily blown away. It's like all dogs will lose to greyhounds in sprinting, and all dogs will lose to pitbulls in fighting.
Though all males have the masculine Id or male animal drive, it is manifested most loudly and aggressively among blacks, as when Muhammad Ali KO'ed Sonny Liston and howled he’s the ‘greatest’. In the 70s, the soccer world looked to Pele as the greatest idol of the game. Even in nations with no standing in world soccer, young boys grew up looking to Pele as some kind of sports god.

So, there could be a kind of global Id Addiction to or Id Worship of the Negro. Especially because the electronic-globo-world culture is so sports-pop-music-sex-porn-obsessed, many non-black women look to and imitate black women as the model of the most bodacious purveyor of the Id. Consider the success of Beyonce, Rihanna, and Nikki Minaj of the twerking-big-butt-school. So many white girls want to be like them.

And among non-black males, their less robust and rambunctious manhood channels the more aggressive, domineering, and violent Id of the Negro who can howl the loudest as rapper, who can sack the quarterback hardest as defensive lineman, and who can hump the most women as mandingo-man.

The Negro-as-Id phenomenon is surely manifested in the 'cuckolding' community where white men invite black men to hump their wives or girlfriends. Thus, white men partake of the bigger and stronger Id of the Negro who be humping da white ho wid gusto. Negro guy becomes the fantasy-extension of the white guy's Id. The white guy plays both biological slave to the Negro(as biological master) and fantasy Negro(as he identifies with the Negro doing his woman[who is sure to leave him sooner than later as no woman can for long respect a cucker]). As sexuality is about domination, people may find pleasure as either master or slave or as both. This is why so many white and Jewish homos go for black men, though white homos also, at times, bugger black men who usually bugger them, which makes the ‘sexual’ dynamics more complicated. The interesting aspect of homo porn(if one has the stomach for it) is that the ‘politics’ of sexuality is far more confused and ambiguous, and this may explain why homo artists/thinkers like Pier Paolo Pasolini, Yukio Mishima, and Michel Foucault made for interesting theorists of power. Though there is the female dominatrix(and recent feminist encouragement to ‘peg’ the men), the male-female sexual dynamics is far simpler, with men as dominant master and female as submissive slave. In contrast, the homo who is buggered as the ‘bitch’ can turn around the bugger the buggerer and make him the 'bitch'. In some ways, the inclusion of the Afro-homo in the Western homo community made things both simpler and complicated. Simpler in the sense that the Negro homo, being more muscled and bigger donged, was more easily recognized as the dominant partner while the white homo was relegated to the ‘bitch’ role. Even so, whereas a white woman cannot screw a Negro man, a white homo can still screw an Afro homo. So, among interracial homos, even the ‘bitch’ slave can bugger the dominant master who can play the ‘bitch’. Though Andrew Sullivan and Milo Yiannopolous are hardly important thinkers, their interracial homo-eroticism may have made them a bit keener about the various shades of power politics. The sexual ambiguity of Camille Paglia certainly accounts for her dual perspective on sexuality, watching through both male and female gaze.

Anyway, given the hedonistic Id addiction to blackness among white folks in US and EU(and among Japanese who are into Jungle Fever and among Chinese who worship black NBA players), the West may be helpless in its sensual-slavery to the Negro and too blind to wake up, come to its senses, and realize that Negromania is fatal to civilization. There is a reason why Odysseus ordered his men to tie him to the pull of the ship. Under the mesmerizing power of the Sirens’ song, he was willing to abandon everything and steer toward the femmes fatales even though he knew it meant sure death.

Emanuel Macron under the Id Power of the 'Groids'. The leader of France, the second power of EU, welcomes Negroes as Sensual Liberators and promotes Jungle Fever and ACOWW or Afro-Colonization of White Wombs.

Emanuel Macron, the Wonder Boy of Globalism, cheers as the Afro-French Soccer team wins the World Cup. As athletes are demigods of current culture, white Frenchmen now worship Negroes as the superior god-race. Macron plans to bring 150 million black Africans to France to impregnate all white wombs while white men are reduced to cucky-wuck status.

2. Blacks as Superego.

Because America dominates the world with media-academia-news-entertainment, its particular brand of Guilt Cult, Iconography, and Redemption Narrative defines global morality. What America feels guilty about, the rest of the world is also made to feel guilty about: The Imperialism of Guilt. What American reveres or worships, the rest of the world is made to revere or worship. After all, American stories, passions, and hangups are beamed to all corners of the world. So, if white Americans feel pangs of guilt about a handful of dead blacks, that matters more than 100,000s or even millions of dead victims in other parts of the world. To an extent, White Guilt is a form of White Power. Even though it burdens whites with the paralysis of guilt, it also burdens the rest of the world with particular white passions for redemption and atonement(even though the world had no part in white ‘historical crimes’). If whites feel sorry about Topic A, the rest of the world is made to feel sorry as well. This is why Negroes especially have gained so much from White Guilt. As US is a global super-soft-power as well as super-hard-power, its narratives and iconography are never just its own but beamed to all people around the globe. If whites feel guilty about Negroes as a sacred people, then the whole world must share in the guilt... or else be derided as ‘racist’. Since whites feel guilt about Jews, the rest of the world better share in the guilt... or else they are Anti-Semites. (This is most comical when it comes to Palestinians, clearly an oppressed people under Jews. But never mind what Jews did to Palestinians. Since whites feel guilty about Jews over what happened in Europe in the Shoah, the rest of the world better share in the guilt... even if the people, such as Palestinians, had nothing to do with Shoah and, if anything, were wiped off the map by Zionist imperialists). Especially because Jews dominate media and academia, they've promoted White Guilt vis-a-vis blacks as one of the great sins(next to the Holocaust) in order to paralyze white power and make it subservient by way of moral blackmail.

As a result, the deification of MLK and Mandela became central(and even mandatory) to global morality. Under such barrage, one might think no people other than blacks-under-white-rule(and Jews of course under goy Christian rule) suffered so horribly, overcame tragedy so nobly, and deserve all of our sympathy in all their transcendent splendorousness — never mind all the black brutality against blacks and Arab enslavement of blacks.
In truth, black Americans throughout the 20th century were generally better off and safer & securer compared to countless peoples around the world. Of course, the US was discriminatory toward blacks, but black-American experience in the 20th century could hardly be compared with true horrors in other parts of the world. Consider the death tolls of Armenians, Poles, Russians, Ukrainians, Chinese, Algerians, East Timorese, Cambodians, Kurds, and etc. And recently in Syria and all because Jewish-supremacists must get things their way.

But because the Jew-run US narrative dominates the world, MLK became a world figure and the 'plight' of black Americans(though piddling compared to true horrors suffered by other peoples in the 20th century) was hyped as one of great 'global' tragedies. And never mind all the dead Iraqi, Syrian, and Palestinian children as the result of Wars for Israel. Just wax tragic about Emmitt Till for the umpteenth time. (To be sure, it also owed to the Cold War in which the Soviet Union and its agents exaggerated the race problem in the US to make Capitalist America seem like an especially evil place.)

And even though blacks in South Africa had it much better than blacks in black-run African nations, Apartheid was made out by the Jew-run and cuck-managed Western Media to be one of the most evil things in history. (Never mind that the South African largess never would have been created under black rule.) If whites feel bad about something, it must be truly bad because white emotions count for more in a media-world that emphasizes whiteness to the hilt as both agency and scapegoat. If whites are glowing over something, it must be especially glow-worthy. If whites are crowing about something, it must be especially crow-worthy. (In contrast, most Americans and much of the world still know little or nothing about Nakba and the Occupation of the West Bank. After all, Jews control the Western Media as main source of world news.) Anyway, because of the cult of Negro Nobility and sanctimony around MLK and Mandela — when Negroes playact as 'noble' and uplifting, they come across as more eloquent & inspirational than most races because of their booming voices or Morgan-Freeman-like folksiness — , white people have come to look to Negro as the gatekeeper of higher morality, the holders of the key to heaven. For many whites, the Magic Negro might as well be god hisself. Indeed, for most whites in both US and EU, it is more blasphemous to badmouth MLK or Mandela(or even Morgan Freeman and of course holy homos) than God or Jesus.

The Negro celebrated as Id and worshiped as Superego.
So, there you go. We have a paradoxical situation where whites look to Negroes as both revelers of the Ultimate Id and torchbearers of the Ultimate Superego. Negro revered as both savage beast and spiritual icon.

Such deranged White Delusions are now at the center of globalist morality and culture.

Of course, white elites don't suffer physically(not yet anyway) from the consequences of this delusion because they have money, privilege, and safe spaces. People like Emanuel Macron, Theresa May, Hillary Clinton, and Joe Biden have it made no matter what happens. They rub shoulders only with fancy Negroes like Obama who know how to push the buttons and milk White Psychology. They reside in their own Elysium world. Elite scum integrate with the creme-de la-creme of Diversity while the native hoi polloi must deal with the sewage of Diversity. It’s so easy to rant against ‘racism’ if your kind need only integrate with fancy Negroes while poor whites must integrate with the likes of Mike Tyson.

In the long run, the spread of blacks and black influence in the culture-at-large will be the fatal undoing of the West. But whites are too blind to understand this because of their addiction to Negro Id and Negro Superego. On the animal level, they cower as beta-dogs before the masterful Negro as alpha-wolf. On the spiritual level, they kneel in atonement as guilty whites before the Magic Negro as black jesus. Because of this racial-sexual-spiritual complex, it is very difficult for whites to think skeptically and rationally on the matter. Both animal emotions and spiritual passions override criticality, evidence, sense, and logic.

If current trends continue, the White Race will be destroyed by the black fist, black dong, black booty, and the black holler as it gazes up at MLK and Mandela as god-angels at the gates of heaven. Also, even as blacks beat up and humiliate whites in schools and streets, whites will be too busy cheering for black athletes to realize that black physicality isn’t their dream team but their doom and gloom..

What is the current condition of the white race? Just imagine the white race as Milo with a Negro dong up his bung as he bitches that Democrats are the 'real racists' because MLK, the black moses and jesus rolled into one, was for the "content of one's character" and salvation of all of humanity through black magic.