Note: CARLITO'S WAY is the closest thing to a Passion Play in the Gangster genre. If ever a gangster movie was made for the Easter Season, this is it. No wonder it was voted by the French film journal Cahier du Cinema as the best film of the 1990s. Though France has long been secular, a certain Catholicist mindset continues to permeate throughout the culture. (The French Revolution sought to turn Paris into the secular Vatican of World Salvation.) As cinema could be said to be the New Religion of France, it is through movies that the French get anything like 'religion'. Imagine Howard Hawks and Alfred Hitchcock with a bit of Robert Bresson, and you have De Palma's second gangster movie, possibly his best work. (He seems to think so.) All the Christian themes and motifs are interwoven throughout the movie. Carlito, sentenced to thirty years, is sprung to new life. He is like Lazarus or Jesus resurrected. He dreams of another world, a kind of heaven in Bahamas far away from the world of crime he'd known all his life. Carlito and Gail, pregnant with his child, are like Joseph and Mary seeking escape and sanctuary. Kleinfeld acts like a parody of the Old Testament God, especially the One confronted with Job's questions. Pachanga turns out to be Judas. Benny Blanco is satan incarnate without possibility of redemption. The Italians are like the Romans. In a way, Carlito doesn't die only for himself but for the sins of all gangsters. As such, he is the last of his kind. He knows they are all tainted, all sinners, and each deserves to die as much as he deserves to live. And one can find many other allusions to Christianity. But our concern here is the role and meaning of Kleinfeld in the story and how it relates to the Real Jew in our world.
In the Brian De Palma movie CARLITO'S WAY, Al Pacino's character of Carlito Brigante owes David Kleinfeld(Sean Penn) big time. Carlito was sent away to rot in prison for 30 years, but Kleinfeld got him out after five. Even though Kleinfeld is a shady lawyer with mobsters as his clients, he is still a legitimate and 'respected' member of society. He attended law school, got a degree, and uses the law(and invokes legal and ethical principles) to aid his clients. He provides service to gangsters, but he isn't outwardly a gangster. Whatever he does, he does it legally within the bounds of rules established by the system. Or that's what Carlito thinks when is out of prison and a free man once again. He feels totally indebted to Kleinfeld and resolved to go clean. His release is like a miracle, and he doesn't want to risk going to prison ever again. Once a major drug dealer raking in lots of cash, he is now content to dream about running a car rental place in the Caribbean. He wants to be in good graces with the law than bet against it. He knows Kleinfeld is tainted and shady given the nature of his clientele, but he also knows Kleinfeld works within than outside the law. (That is until he discovers otherwise later.)
For all his compromises and questionable methods, Kleinfeld is cut above people like Carlito and his ilk. He relies on brain power and the law. In contrast, gangsters rely mainly on muscle, guns, and brute force. While gangsters do business and have their own 'code of the street', when push comes to shove(and it happens quite often), it's about who shoots first and dumps the body in the back of the car. Gangsters may take pride in their toughness, but they are like animals. Just as animals, though bigger and/or tougher than man, look up to humans as superior creatures with mysterious aura and abilities, gangsters like Carlito have a certain respect for guys like Kleinfeld who, without the use of guns and muscles, can find loopholes in the law to get thugs and murderers out of prison. Lawyers have the power of 'magic'. Even though the law exists to lock up criminals, its rules apply to lawmen as well as to outlaws. So, if lawmen violate any part of the law in their over-zealous prosecution of criminals, a crafty defense lawyer can turn the tables and use the law against them. That is how Kleinfeld became rich and successful, a hotshot lawyer who defends mobsters by invoking the sanctity of the law and looking for bugs in the prosecution. He spouts ACLU cliches to the benefit of his clients. He scours for the slightest error in the prosecution to nullify decisions of the court. When Carlito finds himself a free man, he knows that Kleinfeld and only Kleinfeld could have made the miracle come true. He regards Kleinfeld as a better man in so many ways. Smarter, knowledgeable, loyal, grateful, and a good friend. We learn that Kleinfeld's first big clients came through Carlito the once-kingpin, and he hasn't forgotten it. He did everything he could to get Carlito out of jail, and Carlito regards Kleinfeld as more than a friend. He is a 'brother'. Among gangsters, Carlito knows there is no real friend, no one to really trust. Indeed, upon staring at the dead body of his cousin, he says: "...look at you. You said they were friends... but there ain't no friends in this shit business." There can be no trust among gangsters. They may smile and shake your hands, but they will kill you or rat you out at any opportunity. Indeed, when Carlito was in prison, his former gangster buddies did nothing to get him out. Granted, they didn't have the means and know-how(as Kleinfeld does), but even if they could have gotten him out, would they have bothered? For them, it was just one less competition in the streets. In contrast, Kleinfeld went to all that trouble at his own expense to make Carlito free again. Then, it's understandable why Carlito feels he owes big time to Kleinfeld. Indeed, he feels forever indebted. Of course, it's all relative. To decent law-abiding folks Kleinfeld is a sleazy mob-lawyer, but to Carlito he might as well be the angel sent by the almighty. He appreciates what Kleinfeld did for him so much that he wants to be on good terms and graces with Kleinfeld to his dying day. He wants no bad blood between them. And despite his knowledge of Kleinfeld's darker and nastier sides, he wants to focus on the good and even noble side of Kleinfeld. In a way, his appreciation blinds him to Kleinfeld's hidden character. Indeed, Kleinfeld's act of kindness turns out to be the exception that proves the rule. It was less a natural extension of Kleinfeld's character than something that swam against it. So, if Carlito regards it as the defining moment in their 'friendship' that binds them like 'brothers', Kleinfeld is more than willing to undo Carlito's good fortune just to save his own skin with the district attorney prying into his affairs that have grown far more risque while Carlito was away. Kleinfeld hasn't merely been servicing mobsters but acting increasingly like one of them, taking risks and grabbing more than he should. His ego isn't satisfied with being a legal flunky of the hoodlums no matter how well-paid he may be. Instead of being told what to do, he wants to gain leverage over them and subordinate them to his will. He has something approaching like a god-complex, which especially shows itself when, near the very end, he talks to Carlito in the manner that God spoke to a hapless figure in the Book of Job.
It's worth pondering the reasons for Carlito's sentimental mis-perception of the real Kleinfeld. Because of what Kleinfeld did for him, he assumes there is something essentially, even exceptionally, good about him. Not good in the conventional sense(as they are all crooks one way or another) but in terms of honor and friendship. (It's sort of like the sentimental blind-spot of Noodles regarding Max in Sergio Leone's ONCE UPON A TIME IN AMERICA.) Because Carlito is so grateful, he forms a mental image of Kleinfeld that has little bearing on reality. He's so relieved to be a free man again that he fails to question the real motives as to why Kleinfeld did what he did or how true his commitment to Carlito really is. Carlito just assumes that Kleinfeld is like a guardian angel watching out for him. Imagine that, a hotshot lawyer who knows the ins and outs of the legal system never giving up on Carlito and pulling every trick in the book to get him released. Is that a friend or what? A 'brother'.
Yet, despite Carlito's wishful thinking(and ours as well as we want to believe in their 'brotherly' bond), Kleinfeld is quite something else. His one deed doesn't determine his character. While it's true that a person is mostly judged by what he does, actions mustn't be confused for intention. Bad people may do good things not for morality and justice but to gain trust to get a leg-up in society. Furthermore, it's not as if Kleinfeld has been acting like a standup guy all his life. Rather, he's mostly been a snake playing fast and loose with the law in service to mobsters and big time crooks. Therefore, his favor to Carlito wasn't characteristic of his career as lawyer. Indeed, we have good reason to believe that it had been all 'business' between Carlito and Kleinfeld. Kleinfeld did it for money because Carlito was once awash in cash. And that is why Carlito had no reason to believe Kleinfeld would go out on a limb to get him released from a 30-yr sentence because, by then, Carlito had no money left. Kleinfeld could have just abandoned him and spent his energies on other clients still in the business. Therefore, Carlito is especially grateful to Kleinfeld for acting 'personally' on his behalf than merely acting in interest of 'business'.
Special moments make us assume too much. They make us dream up things as we imagine them to be. At the celebration following his release at a nightclub, Carlito tells Kleinfeld that he would marry him if he were a woman. It's like when someone falls romantically in love, he or she is likely to see the other person as he or she imagines him/her to be. The sparkling rush of the moment undermines reason, criticality, skepticism, and evidence. Under the spell of love, the man might see the woman as a princess, or a woman might see the man as a hero. It is no wonder so many love affairs eventually go awry as the person discovers that the other person is not what he or she idealized him/her to be. Because of the sheer euphoria of his release, Carlito feels something like man-love for Kleinfeld. Kleinfeld isn't just his lawyer but his hero, his savior. And in that love, he assumes Kleinfeld feels for him the way he feels for Kleinfeld. And he figures that someone who's been so true to him(while just about everyone else forgot him or gave up on him) wouldn't dare do anything to jeopardize his future and well-being. Now, it's likely that Kleinfeld did Carlito a favor for old-times-sake's and because he personally likes Carlito. One may speculate that maybe he did it as a stunt to promote himself as a super-attorney to prospective clients or perhaps he figured on using Carlito in some way or another, especially as the ex-convict owes him something. But upon release, there's no indication that Kleinfeld had an ulterior motive in doing this favor for Carlito. But we learn sooner than later that Kleinfeld has himself stepped over the line and has become a target in criminal investigations. It appears he's not only using the law to aid criminal clients but taking part in crime for further gain(and perhaps to stoke his own ego as big shot).
Gradually and then dramatically, Carlito discovers the truth about Kleinfeld. Carlito may have regarded Kleinfeld as something akin to a hooker-with-a-heart-of-gold, the staple of so many Western movies. Sure, Kleinfeld loves money and chose to whore himself out to crooks with big bucks, but when push comes to shove, he's a real pal who comes through for you. As it turns out, Kleinfeld is really a pimp-with-an-ice-pick-for-a-heart. Never mistake the real man with his moment of grace. Even a predator sometimes goes easy on the prey and lets it go. Lions have been observed playing with gazelles. Polar bears have been seen playing with sled dogs. Kleinfeld's good deed for Carlito was an exception, and Carlito's problem is the fallacy of characterizing the essence of the man on the basis of his one act. After all, even Josef Stalin had his softer moments when he actually intervened to save innocent lives from persecution and possibly death. But just as it'd be absurd to assume Stalin's core character on such decisions, it turns out to be a huge failure of imagination on Carlito's part to assume that Kleinfeld could really be anything like a 'brother' to him. At best, he was nothing but a toy or just another plaything for Kleinfeld who feels himself to be better and smarter than anybody. In that sense, Kleinfeld is actually worse than any gangster. After all, if there's one saving grace about criminals, it's that they know they're crooks and hoodlums. They act against the law. They accept their lot as members of the underworld. In contrast, Kleinfeld feels himself to be above everything. As a lawyer working within the law, his hands are technically clean, and that makes him better than lowly gangsters and criminals who rely on him for legal counsel. But he has no use for the law either as he increasingly violates its perimeters in the style of a gangster. He's not a straight-up criminal against the law or a straight-up man of law against criminals. He's not even a somewhat honorable defense attorney who represents criminals but within the bounds of the law. Rather, he's an egomaniac with a god-complex who thinks he's so brilliant, awesome, and superior that he can play both criminals and the institutions like a game. Everything is a toy for the wunderkind. He sees all of humanity like Steven Spielberg sees the world through his movies. Like Harry Lime of THE THIRD MAN, he looks upon people like chips in a poker game. All the world is a house of games, like to the Joe Mantegna character in David Mamet's debut film of that very title. And his arrogance and contempt for humanity is such that there is nothing to change his mind.
For Carlito, the release from prison was a life-altering moment. It really did change him, and he meant it. He saw it as a miracle, regarded Kleinfeld as his 'brother', and swore to himself to go clean. Carlito's moral character possessed the possibility of being saved(in the Christian manner). In contrast, nothing can alter Kleinfeld's character because his core character is all about feeling as the center of the universe(and feeling bitter at the world for not bending to his wishes and will). Kleinfeld has what E. Michael Jones calls the Jewish Revolutionary Spirit. According to Jones, Jews are this way because they haven't accepted Jesus Christ as their savior and therefore are still obsessed with turning the world upside down in search of might and/or right. Secular Jews are especially dangerous because, not believing in God, they consider their intellect & smarts to be the greatest thing in the world, or maybe even the universe. Jones is correct to note the especially 'extreme' nature of the Jewish Worldview, but I'm not sure this problem is rooted in their rejection of Christ. It could really be a function of their especially restless and obsessive personality that is likely the result of evolution than lack of salvation. It could be that the most obsessive scholars got the most reverence in the community and married the daughters of Jewish merchants and money-lenders with the most excessive kind of cunning and greed. The extreme prophet mentality got merged with the extreme profit mentality. Then, is it any wonder that Modern Jews are in the habit of elevating Vice as the New Virtue, even going so far as to elevate globo-homo sodomism as the new official cult of the nation, even the world. And in David Kleinfeld, we see the combination of the both the profit mentality and the prophet mentality. He's not only insatiably greedy but so full of himself as the truly deserving god-dude of the criminal world and the legal profession. Deep down inside, he's tired of serving the hoodlums and wants to be their master. As the movie is set around the mid-70s, it was a time when Jews were still on the way up but without the ultimate power. Though Kleinfeld fails and eventually gets killed, other Jews with similar personalities, hangups, neuroses, drive, and obsessiveness did come to take over America(and then over the world under the hegemony of US as the lone superpower, aka the Empire of Judea).
Ironically, Jews were less successful in taking over organized crime than over 'legitimate' society. Jews failed against the 'goombas' but won over the 'waspy' Norwalks of the world(and that ensured Jewish power over the 'goombas' as well). Norwalk did bend the rules to put people like Carlito away, but when push comes to shove, he bows down to the Rule of Law. He's not going to hire killers to wipe out Carlito and Kleinfeld. He has his limits. He might dirty his hands a bit but doesn't want blood on them. In contrast, the mafia hoodlums and the likes of Benny Blanco(from the Bronx) will not hesitate to just blow people away. Against such animals, Jews had little chance. They were smarter than the Italians, but the 'greaseballs' were willing to shoot first, ask questions later. It's like Ace Rothstein the Jew in CASINO is terrified of Nicky Santoro the Italian-American. And Morrie the Jew in GOODFELLAS gets whacked by Jimmy(DeNiro) and Tommy(Pesci). Gangsters act without one hand tied behind their back. In contrast, men who uphold the Rule of Law(however imperfectly) can't simply do as they please. There are limits they dare not cross. Norwalk used illegal wiretaps to get Carlito, but he will not hire killers to wipe out people he sees as scum. His position relies on reputation and respect. And this is why Jews had an easier time taking power from Wasps than from 'Wops'. Even though Wasps had far more institutional and financial power than the 'Wops'(of organized crime), they played by certain rules based on meritocracy and penalty. So, if Bugs(Busy Urban Globalist Semites) are smarter and more capable, they could rise fast and even above Wasps. And if Wasps violated some aspect of the Rule, they could be called on the 'foul' and sent to the penalty box... and the Wasps adhered to the Rule out of shame. (Yet, Jews found a way not to submit to the rules themselves. By promoting themselves as the greatest victims of all time due to the 'Holocaust'[which should be called Shoah, just like the Palestinian tragedy is properly called Nakba] and by associating any criticism of Jews as 'antisemitism', a sickness that led to Nazism and the 'Holocaust', it became dangerous to call 'foul' on Jewish bad behavior. When Bugs called out on Wasps, it was deemed a righteous attack on 'white privilege'. But when Wasps called out on Bugs, it was denounced as vile indulgence in 'antisemitic tropes'. Jews also shut white people up by promoting 'white guilt' about black slavery and 'racism' in the US. Blacks, a corrupt and opportunistic people, took money from the Jews and decided to blame everything on whitey while sparing the Jews, at least on the official level. Thus, whites were pushed into such a corner under barrage of Jewish and black judgmentalism that they dared not call on Jewish and black fouls even as Jews and blacks blamed EVERYTHING on 'whitey'.)
Anyway, one thing Jews realized is that control of the law eventually leads to control over what had once been deemed as criminal activities. So, if Wasps control legality whereas 'Wops' control illegality, all Jews needed to do is gain control over the Wasps to beat the 'Wops' as well. Jews had a difficult time going head-to-head with no-holds-barred thugs. Now, there were Tough Jews who had no qualms about using bloody violence, but when it came to killing with guns and ice-picks, the Italians(and the Irish and blacks and Latinos) were just as capable and at times even more extreme. Though brain power was necessary in organized crime, guns and muscle mattered more when push came to shove. In contrast, brain power, cunning, and strong will were all that were necessary to gain power over Wasps, a people more prone to adhering to the Rule of Law. Once Jews beat the Wasps and gained control of the Law, they could then legalize what had once been illegal or, at best, legal in few localities, semi-legal, or legal-but-disreputable. Once it was made legal, it came under legal protection of the law than had to operate in the ever uncertain underworld. Then, Jews could run the vice industries legally. Jews couldn't compete with black street pimps in urban prostitution, but Jews could control the sex industry once pornography(aka electronic prostitution) was legalized. Jews had a tough time dealing with 'Wops' when gambling was illegal in most states, but Jews pretty much gained control of ALL of gambling once it became nearly universally legal(and even reputable, made so by advertising) across the US. Marijuana as an illegal drug was controlled by Mexicans and others, but as a legal product(that is also promoted for its 'medicinal' qualities), Jewish oligarchs are beginning to corner the market. Jews learned, "Don't try to gain control of what's illegal in contest with hoodlums. Rather, gain control of the law and then legalize what is illegal and then gain control over it under the protection of the law that happens to be dominated by Jews and Anglo-cucks or Anglucks." Sadly for Kleinfeld, he's a Jew who is still operating in an America where many vices were still illegal.
Now, what can we learn about Jewish Power in our world by pondering the Carlito-Kleinfeld relationship? Just ask yourself, why did Carlito feel obligated to go along on the boat ride to lend a hand in the prison-breakout of Tony Taglialucci? Obviously, it was the last thing Carlito wanted to get involved with. Miraculously, he was a free man again, and the last thing he wants to do is anything that might jeopardize his precious liberty. And yet, Kleinfeld made the request. Under normal circumstances, he would have said NO, but he feels obligated to say Yes because he feels he owes so much to Kleinfeld. But it's not only that. Kleinfeld, a passive/aggressive Jew, concocts a tear-jerker about how he's been wrongfully accused of stealing money from Taglialucci — a million dollars to be exact — and how he will be murdered if he doesn't do as told. Carlito, who still thinks highly of Kleinfeld, gives him the benefit of a doubt and agrees to take part in the expedition to fish Taglialucci from the water surrounding the prison-ferry. Even though Kleinfeld's request is a risky and dangerous proposition for Carlito, he regards it as an offer he can't refuse. Not in the way as it's meant in THE GODFATHER — under threat of violence or death — but as a matter of friendship and brotherhood. After all, Kleinfeld is like a 'brother'. There are only two people Carlito will give his life for: Kleinfeld and Gail, the woman he loves.
So, in Kleinfeld's hour of need, how could Carlito say NO? And yet, it begins to dawn more and more on Carlito that Kleinfeld's story isn't as it seems. For one thing, Carlito notices that Kleinfeld acts more and more arrogant, reckless, contemptuous, nasty, and hostile. He notices that Kleinfeld isn't driven only by smarts and greed but angst and insecurity. When Carlito gets into a row with Benny Blanco, Kleinfeld uncharacteristically pulls out his gun, as if he too is a gangster. He becomes more indulgent in the use of drugs, especially cocaine. And on the eve of the boat expedition, he keeps baiting Carlito with hints about the 'trip' in front of Gail even though Carlito patiently pleads with him to stop.
But Carlito's worst fears are realized when (1) Kleinfeld kills Taglialucci and his son, which means that he really brought Carlito onboard as an accomplice to murder and (2) Kleinfeld admits he did steal the million dollars from Taglialucci. He played the role of pitiful victim of intimidation by crazy-paranoid Taglialucci, but he was the real transgressor who stole mob money and then murdered those he'd wronged. He tugged at Carlito's heartstrings and abused Carlito's debt to him in the worst possible way. In doing something so crazy, he not only put a bigger price on his own head but possibly on Carlito's as well. Carlito truly believed he owed the world to Kleinfeld, but after what went down, he is adamant that it is EVEN between them and that Kleinfeld better agree. The scene is as compelling as the one in EL CID where Charlton Heston's hero presses upon the young king to swear to the truth. Carlito is not going to be Kleinfeld's Job(of the Bible). Kleinfeld, for all his brilliance and daring, is not god. Kleinfeld exhausted his moral capital with Carlito who knows something about how debts, monetary or personal, work.
So, how does this tie in with our Jewish Problem? It tells us that it is time — indeed, it's been long past due — for the West to say that it is EVEN with the Jews. Even prior to Jewish vileness baring its fangs since the end of the Cold War, one could argue that the West was more than EVEN with the Jews. Sure, there was the history of 'antisemitism', but Jews had also exploited Europeans since the dawn of time. Furthermore, Jewish financiers, merchants, and theorists collaborated with Europeans in the imperialist enterprise around the world. In addition, Jews played a decisive role in communism that destroyed millions of European/Slavic lives. And it wasn't as if Germans woke up one morning to hate Jews for the
hell of it in the 1920s and 1930s. No, during the Weirmar Period, many horrible Jews came out of the woodwork and acted in the most disgraceful manner to spread decadence and degeneracy far beyond any sane society should tolerate.
Still, given the horrors of the Shoah and Nazi madness, it was understandable why the Western World especially felt sympathy for Jews. Though the 'Holocaust' was greatly exaggerated, there was an extermination campaign against Jews, and a very large percentage of Jews(of all ages) were massacred in certain nations and territories, especially in the East. Of course, one could argue that, instead of the West feeling morally indebted to Jews, it should be the other way around. After all, UK and US could have allied with Nazi Germany just like USSR did for a time. But UK and US joined forces with USSR to defeat Nazi Germany. White goyim lost tremendous number of lives to finally destroy Hitler's empire, and Jews were saved. Given those facts, it should be Jews who should be forever indebted to the Good White Goyim who saved them. But Jews being Jews, clever and cunning, they decided to flip the moral dynamics and make the West feel guilty for not having done enough sooner than later. After all, while Franklin Delano Roosevelt and Winston Churchill dragged their feet in the liberation-invasion of France, it was the Soviets who did the bulk of fighting and dying. And this is why certain Jews, especially of leftist persuasion, felt a certain sentimentality about the Soviet Union after WWII. But then, Soviet Union fought Germany ONLY BECAUSE Hitler decided to invade Russia. Prior, Nazi Germany and Soviet Union not only had a non-aggression pact but cooperated in the invasion of Poland. Furthermore, Stalin's crimes were on the scale of Hitler's, and even a good number of Jews eventually ended up on his chopping block.
Jews are experts at flipping the script. Indeed, it is what Kleinfeld does in the opening of CARLITO'S WAY. Even though Carlito was a killer and drug-dealer, he is presented as an 'innocent' victim of over-zealous prosecutors who violated the law to get their man. During the so-called 'Red Scare', many Jewish agents spied for the USSR and sought to undermine American Security, but the Jew-run media and academia spread the notion that pure-as-snow innocent idealists were rounded up in a dragnet of paranoia that saw 'communists' everywhere. And even though Jews played a key role in Soviet Communism that destroyed so many lives, American Jews in the 1980s were making Soviet Jews out to be the biggest victims of communist tyranny, thereby needing to be brought over to the US with full rights as 'refugees'. Even though homos indulged in putrid sodomy and spread HIV all over in the 1980s and 1990s, Jews made homos out to be angelic victims of 'homophobia'. And even though Jews conquered Palestine and wiped it off the map, they whine about how the Palestinians don't recognize the right of Israel to exist. Israel has 300 illegal nukes made from material stolen from the US while Iran has no nukes and allows international inspections, but Jewish Power in the US would have us believe that Iran is the threat to the world. Even though Jew-run US encroaches upon Russian territory and surrounds it with military bases all around, Jews kvetch about 'Russian Aggression'. Even though Jews vilify whites as a race, they act like they are helpless victims of 'white supremacist' antisemitism. Indeed, Jewish supremacists project their own supremacism onto whites who want liberation and release from Jewish perfidy and Wars for Israel.
Even though so many white goy lives were expended in the defeat of Nazi Germany, Jews act as if they sacrificed themselves for the salvation of the West. No, the West died for the survival of Jews. If anything, Jews had played a crucial role in the rise of National Socialism because so many Germans got sick of Jewish gangsterism, exploitation, and radicalism. To be sure, it's not true that US, UK, and USSR fought Nazi Germany mainly to save Jews. While Jewish influence played a key role in preventing US and UK from cutting a deal with Germany, saving-the-Jews was NOT a priority in any nation. (Of course, things are different today when the #1 reason for any war is predicated on "Is it good for Jews?")
Because the Shoah got elevated to such a ridiculous degree in the West(and thereby the World), it came to dominate and define everyone's view of Jews, as well as Jewish self-perception. Indeed, majority of Jews say the most important factor in their Jewish Identity is the Shoah. We're supposed to see all of Jewish history, culture, behavior, values, and deeds in relation to that single event. It suggests that Jews were always poor pitiful victims(and innocent to boot) who were set upon by mobs or hordes of deranged 'anti-Semites'. So, all the anti-Jewish feelings in the past were merely manifestations of proto-Nazism. And because of the 'Holocaust' and the imperative of NEVER AGAIN, Jews of the present and the future are deserving of all the power they can amass to secure their existence. So, all cases of goyim pushing back against Jews throughout history were just rehearsals for the 'Holocaust' and all Jewish-Zionists acts of force and violence are morally justified as means to fend off 'antisemitism' or 'neo-nazism' and ensure Jewish survival.
Is that a sane way to see the world? Suppose there's a guy who was terribly wronged at a point in his life. Does that mean his entire life is about being a poor victim? Should we view every moment of his life and his every deed, bad as well as the good, through the prism of his moment of victimization? Should the moment serve as a monument? A man who does a heroic act can also do dastardly things. A momentary hero can later go onto steal, rape, rob, and etc. After all, the US military fought some 'good wars' but also some bad ones. Just because the Soviets liberated Eastern Europe from Nazi Germany in 1945 doesn't mean that Soviet tanks that rolled into Hungary in 1956 and into Czechoslovakia in 1968 were also doing something laudable. In THE GODFATHER, we see the Corleones acting honorable and even decent at times. But that doesn't mean they're honorable and decent at all times to all sides. Young Michael Corleone, not yet a gangster, was clearly wronged by the corrupt police chief — he was also a 'war hero' — , but that doesn't mean he remains an innocent civilian or a noble patriot all his life. If anything, he becomes even more ruthless and formidable than his father. We can't judge an entire life by one heroic deed or one wicked deed. Likewise, it's stupid to define the character of an entire people by one historical event. Americans may have fought nobly for independence and liberty against the British in the Revolutionary War, but not all of US history was about struggle for justice and liberty. US history has also been one of 'genocide', slavery, imperialism, mass theft, and alliances with some of the most unsavory regimes around the world. Russians may have fought the Great Patriotic War against the Nazis with much valor and stamina, but Russian history is a complex web of noble and ignoble moments. Then, how ridiculous for us to define the essence of Jewishness based on a single historical event? It'd be like judging Kleinfeld by his one noble deed for his friend Carlito. But just like Carlito realizes there are many sides to Kleinfeld, some far darker than Carlito ever imagined, it's about time we realized there are many sides to Jewishness, the ugly and demented as well as the wise and inspired, the murderous and megalomaniacal as well as the kind and compassionate. Unless we have a nuanced and balanced view of Jews, we will remain under the mandate of regarding Jews as the Perfect People. Do we want to worship Jews like ancient Jews worshiped God? Perfect no matter what? Upon agreeing to such a mental contract, we can't be anything but 'spiritual' slaves of Jews. Sadly, so many have signed it already, and it explains why the Western Policy is essentially "Jews demand, we deliver."
Even if we ignore all the Jewish evils and 'historical crimes' in the modern era prior to the end of the Cold War, it is time for the West to say, "WE ARE EVEN with the Jews." There should be no more burden of guilt or moral debt. Why? Because the Real Jew has reared its ugly head too many times in the latter half of the 20th century and especially in the last decade of the 20th century and all throughout the 21st century. This Real Jew is so far from the myth of the Ideal Jew perpetrated by the Cult of the Holocaust. Jews are not a bunch of Anne Franks, and to be frank, Anne Frank was no saint either. She was just some stuck-up Jewish girl who died of disease in a Nazi concentration camp. Not only has the Real Jew(that especially revealed itself with the Jewish takeover of America) exploded the myth of the Ideal Jew but it has given credence to so many anti-Jewish views and feelings of the past. Via the Holocaust Cult, the Western World was led to believe that the slightest hint of anti-Jewish feelings or perspectives was 'antisemitic', totally irrational and unfounded in facts, and not only wrong but evil and paved the way that finally led to the Shoah. But recent events deriving from Jewish attitudes and actions have proven beyond a doubt that the Real Jew is closer to the 'antisemitic' stereotype than 'philosemitic' fantasy.
This isn't to deny the Jews their greatness, but as greatness is an extreme quality that cannot be separated entirely from ambition, arrogance, aggression, hostility, contempt, obsession, vanity, egotism, megalomania, and/or radicalism, the Jewish Personality is bound to be wrapped up in all sorts of neuroses associated with greatness. After all, moderation in all things doesn't lead to greatness. While a society is best if most people are moderate, the great individuals cannot be moderate but must push it to the limit. Whether it's the first person to climb the mountain, the latest person to lift the heaviest amount of weights, or a composer hellbent on writing the greatest symphony/opera, he is driven by something other than moderation and balance. Richard Wagner was a great artist and had all the flaws associated with an extreme personality. It's like it's impossible to separate the honey from the bees that make it. The sweetness is the product of insects with vicious stings. Society needs great people with extreme personalities, but there cannot be too many of them... just like nature needs lions and wolves but they must be far fewer than the herbivores. People with extreme personalities associated with greatness may do awesome things, but the difficulty of their personality makes them dangerous if there are too many of them or if people come to worship them as demi-gods. Imagine what German society would have been like if every German had the personality and vision of Richard Wagner. Everyone would act as if the world should revolve around him.
This is why society, even as it appreciates the achievements of great individuals, should be wary of the neurosis associated with greatness. Admire the greatness but beware of the extreme ego that fueled the drive toward greatness. When people totally fall under the cult of greatness, the result is something like Nazi Germany or Maoist China. While Adolf Hitler and Mao Zedong were remarkable individuals with greatness of will and vision, they were also monsters of ego and vanity. The world must regard Jews in the way that a sane/stable society regards great individuals. Admire and appreciate the ability and achievement but beware of the ego and arrogance. Jews are a great people, no doubt, but that very obsession with greatness has made them in general a very abrasive, arrogant, difficult, dangerous, vicious, and vile people. Karl Marx was a great prophet of the modern age but also of a tyrannical personality. The cult of personality around Ayn Rand cannot be divorced from her strong and often ugly personality. Stanley Kubrick was one of the greatest film-makers but also a super-a**hole. Jews are to humanity what the great individual is to society. Jews achieved greatness but at the cost of losing much that is moderate, sound, and balanced. Jews denounce Hitler and yet seek Hitler-like power over all of us. They are the fuhrers of the world, and all the world must revolve around them. So, while there is greatness in the Real Jew, there is also much that is vile, hideous. It's like there are remarkable aspects to Kleinfeld. He's obviously very smart and committed to mastery of his profession. He knows the law inside and out. But his is the kind of personality for which enough is never enough. It's not enough to succeed as a mob lawyer; his big fat ego needs to compete with the mob and push it around than the other way around. He's Mr. Brains and did well by it, but he must also be Mr. Tough Guy.
Whites must realize that the score is EVEN between whites and Jews. Jews say that 6 million of their kind died in the Shoah, but those are bogus numbers. Most likely, 2 to 3 million Jews died in World War II, and not all of them were exterminated by the Nazi Killing Machine but were ground down by the general destruction of war. But even if we were to say everyone of those Jews were killed by Germans(or Western Civilization that fostered 'antisemitism'), let us do a historical audit of Jewish 'historical crimes'. Now, we can mention all the people who died as the result of Jewish role in communism, but let's be generous and overlook that. Let's just focus on what Jewish Power has done since the End of the Cold War. First, let's consider the Jewish Rape of the Russian Economy in the 1990s. This economic shock was stupendous for Jews but so horrible for the Russian masses that it's been estimated that a million or even millions of Russians were destroyed one way or another. If we add up all the people who died due to misery or lack of essential services — and all the children who weren't born but could have been if not for the Rape of Russia — , the number is clearly in the millions. Then, let's consider what Jewish control of US foreign policy did to Iraq in the 1990s. After the Gulf War, Iraq was hit with crippling sanctions that mostly affected the lives of ordinary people, especially women, children, and old folks. This was collective punishment, hardly different from Biblical accounts of entire populations being targeted by God's wrath. For the sake of destroying Iraq for the interests of Israel, the sanctions had a devastating effect on the nation. By most estimates, 100,000s of Iraqis died in the decade. By some estimates, 500,000 women and children were killed by disease, malnutrition, or hardship. All of this could have been avoided if the US hadn't become so slavish to Jewish Power, servility to which is the one thing that binds both political parties. Though Gulf War was a response to Saddam Hussein's invasion of Kuwait, records indicate that the George H.W. Bush regime, in concert with Neocons, sent mixed signals to Hussein that the US would not oppose the invasion. Furthermore, contrary to new image of Hussein as the latest incarnation of Hitler, the fact is the US had essentially triggered the Iran-Iraq War by encouraging Hussein to attack Iran in the early 80s. US supplied arms to Iraq(and even secretly to Iran to keep the war continuing), and this all happened when Ronald Reagan's foreign policy team was increasingly coming under the influence of Zionist Neocons and their shabbos goy collaborators. It's been said that about a million people died in the Iran-Iraq War, and in a way, it served as a template for Jewish-controlled America to use divide-and-conquer strategy in the region. Though Jews were not the only ones pushing for more intervention in the Middle East, they led the charge, especially against the 'Arabists', American foreign policy advisers who called for more balanced approach. It was intolerable to Jews that the US should be fair to all sides in the problems in the Middle East. Jews insisted that everything had to be boiled down to "Is it good for Jews?" So, if the cost of Judeo-centric foreign policy is the deaths of 100,000s or even millions of Arab or goy lives, so be it. Now, how is this mentality all that different from the Nazi 'Aryan' ideology of racial supremacism? Jewish supremacist logic says a single Jewish life is more precious than any number of goy lives.
But the madness didn't end there. Even though 9/11 has been blamed on Muslim radicals who did indeed carry it out, the fact remains that Alqaeda came into existence because the US, increasingly under Jewish Power, worked with Pakistan and Saudi Arabia to foster Sunni Muslim extremists as bulwark and/or terrorist-aggressors against initially Soviets in Afghanistan and then against Shia Iran and certain secular Arab states that continued to defy pro-Zionist US foreign policy. 9/11 happened because the very Muslim terrorists created by the US, Israel, Saudis, and Pakistan came to view the American Empire as the main aggressor against Islam. Furthermore, there is no doubt that the Israeli intelligence service Mossad knew about the plot and knowingly didn't alert US authorities. If anything, they nudge-nudged the terrorists along to complete the mission because 'the biggest terrorist attack on US soil' could be capitalized like Pearl Harbor to wage a series of Wars for Israel that began under George W. Bush and continued under Barack Obama(and haven't ended under Donald Trump, another puppet of the Jews). To the extent that Israel knew about the plot but didn't alert the US but, if anything, secretly guided the terrorists means that Global Jewish Power is at least half-responsible for the attack. https://www.bitchute.com/video/0SUBAs2yg7s6/
But 9/11 was nothing compared to the tragedies that would unfold next in the Middle East, North Africa, and all across Europe as the result of Jewish perfidy and monstrosity. Not only did Jewish Neocons in government use 9/11 to scaremonger Americans into the invasion of Iraq but they did it in concert with Jewish monopolists of Big Media who knowingly pushed lies about WMD. But the project of turning Iraq into a complete US puppet didn't go so well. With the Shia majority in power, the nation leaned closer to Iran. With Iran with allies in Iraq and Syria, Jews began to worry about the 'Shia Crescent'. The bloodbath unleashed by the Iraq War wasn't enough to dampen Jewish enthusiasm for more mayhem; if anything, it actually excited Jewish blood-lust even more, like sharks and vampires are driven to greater frenzy by the scent of blood. With Obama as their 'nigger behind the trigger', evil Jewish Supremacists took out Libya on false pretext by arming Jihadi elements, and then the US, under evil Jewish spell, sent weapons in Libya to terrorists in Syria to tear that nation apart. Libya, once the most successful nation in Africa, is now a wasteland. The resulting war in Syria has led to nearly half-a-million deaths. Israel, the Jew-run US, and its puppets or partners, especially Saudi Arabia and Turkey, swooped down upon Syria like a flock of vultures. Syria remains a nation only because Russia and Iran interceded to prevent it from becoming another Libya. To this day, the Jew-run US illegally occupies parts of Syria. To this day, Israel aids terrorists in Syria and lobs missiles into that country.
When we add up all the deaths, direct and indirect, from the violence unleashed by the Jew-run US, the numbers are staggering(and many more are likely to result from the Jewish strategy of making goyim fight goyim). Jews even goaded the US to support Saudi Arabia's genocidal war on Yemen because of the perception that Houthis have some ties to Iran. So, Jews don't care how many Arabs and Muslims are slaughtered. As if that wasn't enough, Jewish hegemonists decided to engineer a coup in Ukraine, ironically with the aid of Neo-Nazi-like elements who revere Ukrainian collaborators with the Germans in World War II. Ukraine has been a total mess ever since, and many thousands have died. So, what is the death toll from the Jewish Rape of Russia, Zionist sanction of Iraq in the 1990s, the 9/11 tragedy, the Iraq War, the fall of Libya, the Syrian War, Yemen War, and the Ukraine Crisis? Add to that the number of people who were killed by opioids pushed on the white population by the Jewish Sackler family. It's surely in the 100,000s, but they were mostly silent tragedies as the White Death was mostly suppressed by the Jew-run media run by scumbags who surely giggled with hideous glee over the horror.
Add up all the numbers, and they surely equal or exceed the 2 to 3 million Jewish dead in World War II. And why did Jews do all this? For one reason only: Jewish Supremacism and Hegemonism. But the disaster didn't end there. All these wars led to tons of refugees, and many opted to migrate to Europe. Also, the breakdown of authority and barriers in Libya meant that countless black Africans had an open bridge to demographically invade Europe. And Israel, which is hellbent on securing its own borders, sent its agents and 'aid workers' to Europe to 'welcome the refugees'. In other words, Jews did the most to cause the refugee crisis by wrecking entire nations but then took 'moral credit' by pretending to 'rescue' the refugees by herding most of them to Europe. If Jews are truly a redemptive people, one might expect them to fess up about their genocidal and/or imperialist wars and apologize and say NEVER AGAIN. You'd expect them to pledge to end all such wars so that people could stay in their own nations and not wander as migrants. But no, Jews want MORE Wars for Israel, more dead Arabs/Muslims, and more non-white migrants or refugees to head toward Europe. In some ways, Jews are worse than Nazis. Nazis were horrible but never pretended to be humanitarians. In contrast, Jews act just like Nazis in pushing their own brand of supremacist wars and mayhem but then also masquerade as people-of-compassion and saintly saviors who go out on a limb to offer aid and comfort to the refugees and migrants. Imagine the Nazis invading and destroying Poland & Russia, all the while pretending to be oh-so-caring humanitarians by demanding that OTHER nations take in Polish and Russian refugees. Yes, the Nazis were vile but not that vile. Jews are that vile. Utterly shameless in their abject hideousness.
Jews are the 2% that owns close to 50% of the wealth in the US. They are the 2% that controls 95% of the media. They are the 2% that controls 99% of all the politicians. Whatever differences the two political parties have in the US, they are agreed on total cucking to Israel and total worship of Jewish Power. Jews also control social platforms & finance and deny speech and funding to those whom they accuse of 'hate speech', but of course, Jews get to decide what is 'hate'. Zionist tyranny over Palestinians isn't 'hate' apparently. Jews who once made so much noise about the Constitution and Free Speech now throw their money around and make politicians of both parties support the anti-constitutional clampdown on BDS and free speech calling for justice for Palestinians. Also, the very Jews who whined endlessly about the paranoia of McCarthyism now spread lies & hysteria and accuse Russia of doing something it didn't do, like interfering with US elections to make Donald Trump president. Of course, it is the US that interferes with governments all around the world.
Jews have also spread gambling, drug use, loose sex, anti-white forms of feminism, and pornification of mainstream culture that have surely led to many deaths from problems of broken lives, depression, addiction, degradation, and degeneracy. Wittingly or not, the Real Jew has shown his face to be hardly different from so many 'antisemitic' stereotypes. Yes, Jews today are the main robbers via finance, main spreaders of drugs & degeneracy, main perpetrators of national ruin all across the West(not least by pushing the Great Replacement or White Nakba), main instigators of wars(especially in the Middle East & North Africa), and main purveyors of rabid & virulent hatred. Consider how many people in the West have been made to hate, hate, hate Russia, Iran, Syria, Arabs, Palestinians, and etc. If you're 'liberal', you probably hate Russia, Russia, Russia. If you're a 'conservative', you probably hate Iran, Iran, Iran, though lately it's been China, China, China. But of course, everyone LOVES Jews; everyone better love Israel.
Jewish vileness can be seen in the utterly hypocritical Zionist-controlled US policy toward Iran and Israel. Iran has no nukes and passed all international inspections. Israel has 300 nukes, not just any nukes but ones made from material stolen from the US. And yet, Israel is showered with praise and billions of dollars while Iran is sanctioned for destruction. How many lives suffered or died in Iran as the result of those sanctions? At this point, Jewish vileness is beyond belief. It is bottomless in its monstrosity. It's not enough for Jews to promote degeneracy, which is bad enough, but they promote it as the new holiness. Jews figure that as long as decadence and degeneracy are merely tolerated, they will still be looked upon with distaste and even disgust. So, the winds may turn against Jewish-backed cultural pollution. That's why Jews decided to 'sacralize' decadence and degeneracy as the new sacrament(and 'empowerment). Globo-Homo Queertianity is to replace Christianity. The trashy vice of gambling has been moralized by associating it with reparations for American Indians. "Desert Inn has heart, Desert Inn has heart."
We have seen the Real Jew at last, and he is so vile and has caused so much damage to all the world that it's no longer tenable — indeed, it'd be downright retarded — to perceive Jews primarily through the prism of the Shoah. If anything, Jewish-led events and trends especially since the end of the Cold War have given us another meaning and lesson of the 'Holocaust'. Surely, one meaning is that Germans went crazy and committed horrors. But the other lesson is that IF Jews keep acting like monsters, there could very well be another backlash that may lead to ANOTHER 'holocaust'. Given our understanding of the Real Jew, we can no longer believe that pure-as-snow Jews were set upon by evil goyim for no good reason at all. Rather, there were many good reasons to dislike and hate Jews. It's just that Germans went too far. But the way Jews are carrying on in our world and in our time, they just might drive humanity over the edge and unleash another round of horrors. Germans learned the lesson of WWII. They learned that, just because Germans had been wronged by the Versailles Treaty and suffered terribly in the Great Depression, it didn't give them license to act like supremacist-imperialists and treat other nations with murderous contempt. But Jews seemed to have come away with exactly the opposite lesson. The lesson they drew from the tragedy is that they are always right no matter what they do. It led to Shoah Nihilism, or Shoah-chauvinism or Shoahvinism. The moral cover of the Shoah gives Jews the 'right' to do whatever. They can act like the New Nazis all the while accusing others of being New Hitlers. It's like Kleinfeld thinks he can ask Carlito for ANY FAVOR since Carlito owes him. Jews once had Holocaust Credit but they've spent it all and then borrowed more and spent that as well, and they are now in the business of printing ever more Holocaust Dollars to push more Wars for Israel and Jewish Supremacism.
This must come to an end It must be over. Enough is enough. WE ARE EVEN. No more moral credit to Jews who've bared their true face as the Real Jew, and it is an ugly monstrous creature indeed. Jews have shown themselves to be Full-Gangster in their greed, sadism, nihilism, and blood-lust. Anne Frank is now Anne-Frankenstein. The world carrying on as if Jewish gangsters are saints would be like pretending vampires are selfless blood donors. Say it. "We're even. We're even." And then and only then can goyim be free at last, free at last.
We have seen how the material political power of Islam declined very rapidly during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries.
Did it decline or fail to keep up with the West? Maybe the Muslim remained where it was while the West advanced technologically. If someone stands still while you walk forward, he's not moving backward even though he will increasingly fall back behind you.
Hilaire Belloc:
Cultures spring from religions; ultimately the vital force which maintains any culture is its philosophy, its attitude toward the universe; the decay of a religion involves the decay of the culture corresponding to it – we see that most clearly in the breakdown of Christendom today. The bad work begun at the Reformation is bearing its final fruit in the dissolution of our ancestral doctrines – the very structure of our society is dissolving.
But the real benefit of Christianity was not that Western culture sprung from it but that the culture had something to fall back on when things went south. Christian moralism has stood in the way of cultural inspiration and creativity. Even though Renaissance artists created many religious works, the true spark and inspiration were neo-pagan. But paganism has a way of becoming decadent, nihilistic, and idolatrous, a narcissism of power and beauty. Christianity provided some balance to such tendencies. The main creative source of Western Civilization is Greco-Roman and even Germanic imaginations. But creativity isn't necessarily moral; it is also elitist and belongs to a few. As such, it can't for long serve as the basis of a stable civilization. Morality must be the core values of a people, and that is where Christianity proved most valuable. Not because culture sprung from it — Western Civilization was already great and accomplished before its conversion to Christianity. As for the Reformation, it was a response to the corruption and decay of the Catholic Church that came to overly rely on rituals and idols than on creed and conviction. For awhile, Reformation restored Christian passion.
Hilaire Belloc:
In the place of the old Christian enthusiasms of Europe there came, for a time, the enthusiasm for nationality, the religion of patriotism. But self-worship is not enough, and the forces which are making for the destruction of our culture, notably the Jewish Communist propaganda from Moscow, have a likelier future before them than our old-fashioned patriotism.
But patriotism is not about self-worship. It's not about worship at all. It's about pride and preservation of heritage. It is not a religion in and of itself. Also, spirituality can be made a part of patriotism and nationalism. This is most evident in Judaism and its Covenant that fuses tribalism with spiritualism. In a similar vein, Christianity can be made part of national heritage, i.e. while Christianity is for all the world, each people can stress their own story of how they came to the Faith, and that particularity within universality should have been stressed. Consider the Russian Orthodox Church. It is Christian and Nationalist. Likewise, Buddhism has a nationalist element among Tibetans, Vietnamese, Burmese, and etc.
In the end, Jewish capitalism turned out to be far more damaging to Western Man. Though Jews were heavily involved in communism, its triumph came to suppress Jewish power that relies on individual enterprise, tribal networking, and meritocracy to realize its full potential. In all communist nations, the Jews eventually lost out to the non-Jewish majority as communism is about The People and Mass Mediocrity.
The reason why nationalism came more naturally to Europeans is because European societies developed from agriculture. In contrast, Arabs were nomadic and generally didn't put down roots in any part of the desert. They were movers, traders, and raiders. Of course, in time, Nationalism began to fade among Europeans with increasing urbanization and globalism that made it easy for Europeans to move abroad and for non-Europeans to move into Europe. Nomadism is intrinsic to globalism. Wings rule over the feet.
Steve Sailer:
History often turns upon unexpected personalities. The West has been fairly lucky that no outstanding man has arisen in Islamic world. Since 1936, probably the two most remarkable personalities have been Nasser, who was more of a Bonapartist modernizer demagogue than an Islamist, and the Ayatollah Khomeini.
This may be true of past history when Muslims had a chance of literally conquering the West like the Mongols also nearly did. But in the modern era, why would the emergence of a great Muslim leader be bad for the West? Did Ayatollah call for invasion of the West? No, all the stuff about 'great satan' was mostly rhetorical. Kemal Ataturk wanted peace with the West and Westernization for Turks.
The main reason why Gamal Nasser and other notable Arab/Muslim leaders lost out is because Jews gained power in the West and used West as a proxy against the Arab/Muslim World. Israel was a Western creation of Jews and whites who supported, defended, and supplied Zionism at every turn.
The West, under Jewish Power, also crushed Saddam Hussein who, though a horrid person, did much to modernize Iraq. Living standards for most Iraqis were pretty decent prior to the Gulf War. For all the problems among Arabs, their societies would be far more accomplished if not for Jewish control of the West and use of Western power as proxy of Jewish agenda. Iraq today would be formidable if not for the Gulf War, semi-genocidal sanctions, and the invasion. Iraq was also building nuclear power plants before they were bombed by Israeli jets with US support. Syria would be in much better straits if not for Neocon agenda of sending and aiding terrorists. Gaddafi made real gains in Libya before Jewish-ruled West destroyed it. And Iranian economy would be much stronger if not for sanctions forced by Jewish-controlled US. If it came down to Jews vs Muslims, Jews would not necessarily win even though, pound for pound, they are smarter than Arabs/Muslims. The real secret to Israel's success and Muslim world's failure is that the Jews control the West that does the bidding of Zion. But suppose a Muslim-controlled West sanctioned Israel for its war crimes and dropped bombs to kill Israel leaders and figures. Where would Israel be?
Hilaire Belloc, Muslims, Arabs, Muslim World, Iraq, Turkey, Israel, Steve Sailer, nomadism, Western Support of Zion,
Decline of the US empire? No, US is still the sole superpower. More importantly, the real power isn’t ‘American’ but Jewish Supremacist. US is the main aircraft carrier and money bag of the Empire of Judea(EOJ), and the tentacles of EOJ stretch across many nations in North America, Europe, South America, Middle East, Asia, and Africa, esp South Africa.
If anything, the ‘Americanization’ of the world — which means falling under control of Jewish influence — still gathers pace around the world.
Even when nations supposedly oppose globalism in the name of 'populist globalism', all they do is invite more Diversity and suck up to Jews. Look at Brexit. Leaving the EU has led the UK to take in more darkies and suck up to Jews even more under Boris the Spider Johnson. Clever Jews hedge their bets and have puppets on both sides. So, no matter which side wins, Jews get what they want. Even Donald Trump, though loathed by most Jews, does little but suck up to EOJ. He even works with his Jewish masters to shut down free speech critical of Israel and Jewish supremacism. It's 'muh holocaust' or 'muh gay' all the time. And given that Jews are pushing Jungle Fever and ACOWW(Afro-Colonization of White Wombs), the US as sole superpower is turning into a Soul Superpower at least when it comes to its 'cultural capital' that is mostly about rap music and black-dominated sports.
Kevin Barrett's Reply: The US can no longer get what it wants. It has wanted to take back Venezuela for two decades and can’t do it. It wanted the Taliban defeated and eliminated by 2002. It wanted a stable pro-Israel pro-US Iraq by 2004 at the latest. It wanted Iran, the “7th country in 5 years” destroyed (or “regime changed”) by 2006. It wanted Assad out. It wanted North Korea to give up its nukes. It wanted Turkey to stop working with Russia and give up the S-400. It wanted Pakistan to stop tilting toward China. It wanted the Ukronazis to win. It wanted Russia to cave. It wanted to stop Russia from being Europe’s biggest energy supplier. It wanted Chinese economic growth, and the technological and military power it buys, to flatline. And so on.
Meanwhile the other poles of the multipolar world led by Russia, China, and Iran have let the US spend itself into a corner. The dollar is hollowed out and will collapse whenever the other poles want it to. And the big expensive military that killed the dollar can’t even beat backwards tribesmen in places like Yemen and Afghanistan. So the 2020s will undoubtedly witness the US getting less and less of what it wants. The US ability to dictate terms to the world is over.
As for the Zionists, they are just a parasite that sucks whatever blood is available. America’s blood is almost gone. So they will diversify their bloodsucking, and are in fact already doing so.
But the US never got everything it wanted. During the Cold War, it lost Cuba. And even its successes in Latin America smeared US reputation as it had to support 'right-wing death squads'. US pulled out of Vietnam. US power was at its zenith with the fall of Soviet Empire, but by the end of the 20th century, Vladimir Putin and nationalists were regaining power in Russia. And the Middle East was mostly intact except for Iraq that had been crushed in the Gulf War. (Still, Hussein was in power until 2003.) So, it’s misleading to say the World Order went from US getting everything to US not getting everything. The US never got everything.
It has wanted to take back Venezuela for two decades and can’t do it
But Venezuela is on shaky legs and is far weaker than in the Bush II years when Hugo Chavez was snubbing his nose. Chavez deserves praise as a nationalist, but his version of socialism was deeply flawed as it relied on high oil prices and patronage machine politics. Once oil prices plummeted, so did the economy. The regime in power is weaker than ever and just holding on. Also, US empire pushed back against the Latin National Left with considerable success. Ecuador is now in hands of US stooges. Just ask Julian Assange. Brazil is ruled by pro-Zionist Bolsanaro. Bolivia is now ruled by pro-US junta-backed ‘democracy’. Cuba, though independent, signed onto globo-homo nonsense.
It wanted the Taliban defeated and eliminated by 2002. It wanted a stable pro-Israel pro-US Iraq by 2004 at the latest.
Maybe, maybe not. In a way, the Taliban threat is a useful excuse to continue the US occupation. If the Taliban had really been eradicated, US would no longer have a valid reason to stay. US wants to occupy Afghanistan, not let it go. So, as long as the US has the Taliban Excuse, it stays and gets what it wants, thus encircling both Russia and Iran.
As for Iraq, it was a disaster, but that was good for the Empire of Judea(that rules the US) in a way. After all, a stable democracy in Iraq might still have turned out to be nationalist and pro-Arabist. It’s possible that once the Jewish-run US realized that the Shia-led regime in Iraq would lean toward Iran, it secretly armed and aided Sunni insurgents to attack and subvert the government. Make Arabs fight Arabs. Play both sides. To the extent that new Iraq had been a never-ending story of Arabs killing Arabs, the Empire of Judea loves it. After all, it created the exact same conditions in Libya and Syria. So, in that sense, the ‘disaster’ of Iraq turned out to be a useful formula, a handy template, in dealing with other 'rogue' Arab nations. Don’t invade and turn them into democracies. Just arm and fund certain ‘moderate rebel’ factions and set them loose to turn the Middle East upside down. While Israel is peaceful and prosperous, look at the horrible conditions in Iraq, Libya, and Syria. Total hell on earth. It looks like ‘failure’ but is actually a success to the extent that mayhem among Arabs means more power for Zionists. And Jewish-run US pulled it off with help from treacherous Saudi Arabia and Turkey.
As for Iran, it is reeling more than ever from economic sanctions. Given that Iran is a huge nation, it’s unlikely that the US wants a full-blown war. Rather, it uses financial terrorism and other means to undermine Iran, and they've been very successful. US didn’t topple Assad but got the next best thing. An utterly ruined Syria where US continues to occupy and steal oil. As for Pakistan leaning closer to China, that is the consequence of US growing closer to India, the much bigger prize. Though India is too big for the US to push around, it’s been working with US as bulwark against China-Pakistan. To be sure, the Hindus are clever and play both sides.
It wanted the Ukronazis to win. It wanted Russia to cave. It wanted to stop Russia from being Europe’s biggest energy supplier.
The Ukronazis did win. They are still in power in alliance with Judeo-Nazis. Also, the energy war is just beginning. With the shale revolution, the US aims to export tons of liquid gas to the EU. As for China, who knows what will happen. It’s debt is 3x its GDP. Very troubling.
The dollar is hollowed out and will collapse whenever the other poles want it to. And the big expensive military that killed the dollar can’t even beat backwards tribesmen in places like Yemen and Afghanistan.
But even now, nothing comes close to the power of the dollar. And Chinese economy depends so much on export to the US. In that sense, the US has China by the balls. China relies far more on the US market than the other way around. Also, US military didn’t engage in Yemen. In Afghanistan, it is there to occupy and continues to do so.
So the 2020s will undoubtedly witness the US getting less and less of what it wants.
But the US is still the #1 destination for smart people around the world. Concentration of brain power will determine much of the future. They are coming to NY, LA, and San Fran to serve the US in its high-tech domination. Immigration is mass treason(except for Jews who control what it means to be 'Pro-American', which today is invariably Pro-Jewish-Supremacist-and-Zionist). Hindus, Muslims, Chinese, Russians, and etc. come to the US to make money and to serve the Empire of Judea, often against their own kind. Palestinians in the US pay taxes that go to support Israel’s oppression of Palestinians.
As for the Zionists, they are just a parasite that sucks whatever blood is available.
The problem is Jews are para-hosts. Yes, Jewish power is parasitic and sucks blood, as in the 2008 bank bailouts. But Jewish Smarts do create lots of new enterprise and money, and goyim(esp politicians) suck on Jewish money as craven dependents. Jews are not like the Sicilian-Americans in GOODFELLAS who are purely parasitic or like Gypsies who only steal. Jews do a lot of bad shit but are also at the front-line of creating the new world of technology and markets. Thus, too many goyim have grown dependent on Jewish money-making. They suck the blood of Jews who suck on the blood of goyim. Jews suck but are also sucked upon. Thus, they are more than parasites. They also serve as hosts, or parahosts.
Judging by today’s crazy standards on ‘gender’ issues, just about every actor, artist, director, and etc. in the not-too-distant past was a ‘homophobe’ and definitely a ‘transphobe’. Or, more accurately, 'homo-disdainer' and 'trans-ridiculer'. Even 90% of Liberals in the 60s thought homosexuality was deeply problematic. Even most Liberal publications dared not to broach the subject. Psychology department was convinced homosexuality is a mental disorder. Susan Sontag's piece on Camp was controversial(even in an ultra-liberal magazine like PARTISAN REVIEW) because it discussed homosexuality. So, there was nothing strange about what John Wayne said on that issue.
As for Wayne’s ‘white supremacist’ view that blacks need to undergo further civilizational process before fully partaking of democracy, is it really all that outrageous? After all, how is it all that different from Samuel Huntington's theory that Third World nations would do better to undergo process of modernization under iron-fisted Enlightened Autocrats before gradually transforming into functional democracies? If anything, even many Liberal political scholars came to the same conclusion. Many social scientists and political scholars came to believe that sudden democratization can actually do more harm than good among peoples who are as yet culturally and economically unprepared to take on burdens of electoral politics(that can only work with rule of law and civic responsibility). Such dictator-supremacist theory became quite vogue in political science departments. That is why many came to appreciate Deng over Gorbachev following the implosion of the Soviet Union. Deng maintained Party supremacy and worked on economic development, whereas Gorbachev favored political reforms. Russia did even worse in the 90s when it fully went ‘liberal democratic’ without the institutions and attitudes necessary for a functional liberal democracy. And after the Rwandan disaster, the West enthusiastically supported the iron-fisted autocrat that kept tight order in that troubled nation. Denial of democracy in such nations doesn’t seem to bother Westerners. Indeed, Obama aided Egyptian military against democracy headed by Muslim Brotherhood. The idea was that Military supremacism was better than democracy in a nation that was, as yet, not ready for democracy and freedom. Also, after the debacles of Iraq and Libya, many(on both left and right) came to the conclusion that some nations are better off under the supremacism of an Iron-fisted leader than with experiments in ‘liberal democracy’. While democracy may be ideal for modern nations, not all nations and peoples have the values, habits, knowledge, and developmental levels to make democracy work. They just aren't cut out for it. In such cases, iron rule is often preferable to democracy. Indeed, that was precisely why Fidel Castro’s Cuba got favorable press from American Progressives during the Cold War. They admitted he was a dictator and that Cuban politics was about One-Party Supremacy, but they also emphasized that Cubans were better off under a tough ruler than many people in willy-nilly Latin American democracies where ‘leaders’ are are little more than shills of transnational corporations and organized crime. It’s oft-been duly noted that blacks in Cuba lived healthier lives than blacks in freer Latin American nations(and even in the US).
So, John Wayne’s views were along similar lines. There was not ONE America but TWO Americas. White America was sufficiently advanced for full democracy, but blacks had yet to attain full civilizational outlook to function properly in a free and democratic society. They had to undergo a process of modernization, not unlike peoples in pre-democratic developing nations, before they could take part in democracy. Granted, this line of argument was somewhat disingenuous because whites had had lots of time to civilize blacks since the end of the Civil War but mainly used political muscle to keep blacks down and marginalized. But then, as we’ve witnessed since the 1960s, even with best intentions of progressive whites, liberated blacks tend to use their freedom to act wild and destructive than sound and constructive. With blacks, you can’t win. If you keep them in line with an iron hand, you are the oppressor. But if you give them freedom, they run wild and degrade society. Indeed, even Wayne’s civilize-the-blacks idea wouldn’t have worked in the long run because black problems are less cultural than biological. Blacks evolved in Africa over 100,000s of years to be warriors, hunters, and jivers. With freedom, even civilized blacks eventually revert to their ugabugery.
Now, there may have been another reason why Wayne argued for denying blacks full freedom. Though he didn’t say it, he surely noticed that blacks are more muscular, more macho, and got bigger dongs. As a famous tough guy, he couldn’t honestly say, “We white guys will lose our manhood and our white women to the muscular and bigger-donged Negroes if we give them full freedom.” He had too much pride. But in fact, his ‘white supremacism’ was really a crutch against the threat of black supremacism. The 1970s movie MANDINGO with Ken Norton shows that black men are tougher than white guys, and white women get jungle fever the moment their eyes set upon some big Negro with more muscle and bigger dong. So, biology is black supremacist when it comes to raw manhood. Nature favors black manhood over white manhood in the thumping-and-humping department. But Wayne, like most white men of his period, had too much pride to speak honestly and say, “What I’m really freaked out is about black supremacism over us white guys. Did you see Woody Strode? I’m a big strong guy, but he’s twice as muscled and probably has a dong twice the size as mine. And that’s why we need segregation cuz integration will mean black supremacist manhood turning us white guys into a bunch of wussy white boy cucks.”
But it would have been better for the white race and the truth if he had said as much. All stable and lasting orders are based on truth, not fantasy.
On 33:22 of the video below, Luke Ford decries Jean-Francois Gariepy for subscribing to the view that World War II began, for all intents and purposes, in 1933 when the National Socialists came to power and were met with what was essentially a declaration of war on Germany by World Jewry. Halsey English then derides Gariepy for spewing nonsense and says ONLY ONE Jewish-owned newspaper ran a headline to that effect: "Judea Declares War on Germany".
So, which side is correct? Is Luke Ford right to stick with the conventional Narrative that WWII was the result of Adolf Hitler’s madness, or is there something to Gariepy’s position that Germany was forced into what became WWII by hostile Jewish machinations?
On the face of it, I would have to agree with Luke Ford that Gariepy is peddling a dangerous(and loathsome) canard. There would have been no World War II without Adolf Hitler and the fanaticism of those in his inner-circle. Even though Hitler amassed huge support among the German people, the great majority didn’t want war. If they cheered Hitler’s military successes, it was in the hope that the tensions would come to an end with the latest victory.
Granted, the general public has been fed a cartoonish version of history where crazy villain Hitler just decided to invade nations to fulfill his ambition of ‘conquering the world’. In truth, as Patrick Buchanan laid out in his tome UNNECESSARY WAR(much of which I don’t agree with), there was considerable rationality and pragmatism(under international pressure) in Hitler’s decisions. Often, he acted like a masterful statesmen in the game of political chess. Sometimes, his regime was acting like the elites of any other great power. Also, there were times when hard decisions were forced upon by Germany by changing circumstances, not least because Germany was situated between Western great powers and the great Eastern power, the USSR. So, it wasn’t like Hitler-as-evil-master-of-the-world was causing all the problems and forcing events on saintly nations. Still, World War II could have been easily avoided if it weren’t for Hitler’s rashness, megalomania, and deeply rooted pathology. Consider that the Great Powers had allowed Germany to retake the Rhineland. The union of Germany and Austria was tolerated, not least because the majority of Austrians enthusiastically welcomed the outcome. And given Sudetenland was over 80% German, it was allowed to merge with Germany as well. But then, Hitler moved onto Czech territory. Prior to that invasion, Hitler’s moves had been mainly one of Germans reuniting with Germans. Austrians, being Germanic, were happy to join with Germany. Therefore, prior to the invasion of the Czech nation, Germany held the moral high-ground, and that was part of the reason why the Great Powers didn’t protest too much. But the annexation of Czech nation into Greater Germany was different. It was clearly an act of Continental Imperialism, and the Great Powers felt obliged to do something. But, they let it go. So, if Hitler had stopped there and then, war could have been avoided. Or, if Hitler wanted to press further for more territory, it should have been for Danzig, a city next to East Prussia and with a population that was over 90% German. No matter what might have happened as the result of Hitler’s hypothetical move on Danzig, the Germans would have at least had a valid moral justification. After all, it would have been a case of Germany reclaiming a city that was rightfully theirs, one that was heavily populated with Germans(who wanted to be part of Germany) and steeped in German history and culture. But what did Hitler do? He made a diabolical pact with the USSR, and the two imperial powers invaded and divided Poland in half. It was then that the great powers, UK and France, declared war on Germany. Historians have marked this event as the beginning of World War II, but this only makes sense in retrospect. The fact is World War II didn’t begin with the invasion of Poland. For one thing, despite UK and France’s hostile declarations, they hardly did anything. There was a kind of ‘cold war’ between Germany and UK/France, that is until Germany decided to attack France. The German victory was so swift and sudden that it hardly expanded the scope of war. If anything, with France under German Occupation, there was greater stability in Western Europe. It was no longer France vs Germany but France with Germany. UK, the other great power held out, and the fighting continued back and forth between Britain and Germany, but as neither side had any real hope or will to defeat the other, it was limited warfare at best. Now, if Hitler had maintained the status quo at the stage in the game, there would have been no world conflict. World War II really kicked off into high gear when Germany invaded its ally the Soviet Union. Had Hitler maintained peace with USSR, there would be no mention of World War II in today's textbooks. German annexation of half of Poland and victory over France would be remembered as a limited European war, not a World War. But in 1941, for whatever reason, Hitler decided to attack the USSR, and that is what set off a global conflict, not least because Japan, upon observing Germany’s spectacular early triumphs, was convinced of German victory and felt emboldened to strike at the US navy at Pearl Harbor in the same year. So, World War II really began with the German invasion of the USSR in 1941, and Hitler must take the blame. If Hitler didn’t want another World War, all he had to do was keep the peace with the USSR. Now, there are some alt-historians who argue that Stalin was preparing to invade Germany and that Hitler’s attack on the USSR was to beat Russia to the punch, but unless there is a smoking gun to back up such claims, we are better off with the conventional narrative.
Anyway, given these facts, it was irresponsible of J.F. Gariepy to say that WWII really began in 1933 when World Jewry declared war on National Socialist Germany. The fact is it was within Hitler’s means to prevent tensions from reeling into a conflict on the global scale. He'd gambled in 1939 by moving into non-German territories, thereby incurring the wrath of UK and France. But he found a new ally in the USSR, and besides, Germany’s quick neutralization of France made it less likely for a burgeoning war. At the time, Germany had allies in Italy and Spain. And most Eastern European nations were ruled by right-wing regimes that were favorable to Germany. And Scandinavian nations sought neutrality and did business with Germany. (Germany did invade Norway but to preempt the planned British invasion.) On top of that, Germany was allied with the USSR. So, if Hitler wanted to avoid a cataclysmic war, all he had to do was run out the clock with the UK while maintaining an alliance with the USSR. But he did attack Russia, and it would be wrong to blame the Jews for Hitler’s craziest move. So, Luke Ford and Halsey English are right that one cannot blame Jews for WWII.
And yet, if we assume Gariepy was using hyperbole to make a point and modify his statement somewhat, there is truth to the claim that World Jewry did declare war on Germany in 1933 and that this had serious ramifications and repercussions unforeseen by Jews(and everyone else at the time). According to Halsey English, Gariepy's claim lacks merit because there was no nation called ‘Judea’. If anything, Jewish populations were dispersed around the world. As such, there was no single Jewish national entity to declare war on Germany. This is technically true, but a great power need not be national. It can be an imperial-network, and this was true of World Jewry. Indeed, historians have often failed to acknowledge the true extent of Jewish power because it wasn’t concentrated in one nation but spread out over cosmopolitan urban centers of various nations. Now, if all these various Jewish elites lacked Jewish consciousness or a sense of shared Jewish interests, it wouldn’t have mattered much. If that were the case, British Jews would have served only British interests, American Jews would only have served American interests, French Jews would only have served French interests, and so on. But in fact, despite differences in cultures and languages among World Jewry, there was a shared sense of interest among the Jewish elites(and Activist Jews) around the world. One thing for sure, during the Russian Civil War, Jewish-Americans(even capitalist ones) lent support to Jewish-Russian communists. Both American-Jews and Russian-Jews regarded Traditional Russia with the same kind of loathing. So, even though there was no single Jewish nation to declare war on Russia, a kind of worldwide Jewish Network did work in concert to aid the War on Traditional Russia. There was a kind of silent global Jewish declaration of war on the White Forces in Russia during the Civil War. Now, many Jewish communists didn’t see it as a war between Jews and Russians. They were ideological true believers(and they sometimes terrorized even religious Jews). But the fact that even non-communist Jews around the world lent support to communism in Russia had something to do with the perception that communism was good for Jews in Russia. So, even if there was no independent Jewish nation called Judea during World War I, Russian Revolution, and World War II, we can still acknowledge that there was a Jewish Imperial Network, one that might be called the Empire of Judea. Indeed, this is how empire works. British Empire was more than Great Britain. Its power was spread out and embedded in all its colonies. The power was not only in the national center but in the global network. And consider the Roman Empire. It initially spread out from Rome but continued even after Rome fell to the Barbarians. The surviving Eastern Roman Empire was centered in Constantinople and had a vast network from the Balkans to parts of North Africa. Thus, Roman Imperial Power had gained reach and influence beyond Rome and Italy itself. It took on a life of its own, thus surviving and expanding long after the destruction of Rome. Jewish Power also kept expanding and spreading despite the fall of Jerusalem to the Romans. Despite the loss of the Holy Homeland, Jews spread out all throughout the Middle East, North Africa, and Europe. And over time, they gained mastery as middlemen and became influential advisers to kings and noblemen. Of course, unlike the British or Romans, the Jews were never the official Masters of the World. But their skills in money and business were such that they were able to gain tremendous influence in both the West and East. And even after periodic pogroms and expulsions, Jewish power and influence eventually spread out again because of the Jewish Network. So, if Jews lost out in place A, they might find support from Jews in place B, C, D, or E. Or if Jews were kicked out of B, C, D, and E, they might rebound on their feet with support from Jews in F, G, or H. Jewish Diaspora was both curse and blessing. On the downside, Jews were spread thin all over the world. But on the upside, if Jews got squashed in one part of the world, there were Jews in other parts of the world to lend a hand or offer sanctuary. Jewish eggs were never in a single basket. Also, because Jews were spread out across many regions, they became more informed of the larger world through networks and contacts. In World War II, if the US had decided to nuke all of Japan and kill all Japanese, that would have been pretty much the end of the Japanese race. But because Jews were spread out over the world, their power could rebound quickly even after a massive disaster like Shoah.
Now, not all Diaspora Peoples have collective identity or work in concert. There are people of Spanish descent all over the world. In Spain obviously but also all throughout Latin America. But how often have Hispanic peoples worked collectively as a Tribe? It seems most people of Latino descent don’t care about others of their kind in other nations. As Catholicism has been central to Spanish culture, most Latinos are likely to think more in terms of culture or values than of identity and blood. In contrast, Jewish identity is centered around the concept of the Covenant that says all Jews are uniquely bound by blood. In other words, Jewishness isn’t merely an idea or value-system but a matter of unity of blood and spirituality. Christians have to drink the universal blood of Christ to feel holy. In contrast, Jews feel holy just by having Jewish blood course through their veins. So, it makes sense to speak of World Jewry as a political power in its own right.
Now, that doesn’t mean that all Jews around the world feel a strong sense of Jewishness or care about other Jews 24/7. And surely, many Jews became attached to certain nations and ended up fighting other Jews in other nations. During WWI, French Jews could end up killing German Jews on the battlefield. And during the Cold War, many American Jews were loyal to USA while many Soviet Jews were loyal to Russia. Still, to the extent possible, Jews around the world have identified more with one another than with fellow goy nationals. So, even though Polish Jews learned Polish language and gained knowledge of many things Polish, they felt closer to Jews of other nations than to Polish Catholics. It’s fair to say that most Jewish Americans feel closer to Israeli Jews or Jews in France than with ‘white trash’ Deplorables in West Virginia, Mexican-Americans, and Muslim-Americans. Indeed, the more diverse the US becomes, there will be a weaker sense of common Americanism, and it’s possible that many groups will become more like Jews in identifying more with others of their kind in other nations than with fellow Americans of different races or ethnicity. It seems many Mexicans in California and Texas identify more with Mexicans in Mexico than with non-Mexican Americans. But if most goyim have weak identities — most non-white Jews in the US just became generic ‘white Americans’ — , Jews have maintained a powerful and unique sense of identity that has made them feel special as embodiment of human treasure(the 'Chosen') and human tragedy(the targeted). Jews admire themselves more than any other people do but also pity themselves more. And it is for this reason that we can’t discount the real power of World Jewry as a collective global power and presence. Especially because Jews have mastered world-wide communication and mediation, they became better connected with one another across many national borders than any other people. For one thing, because Jews were so heavily invested in currency and money-lending, they had to be ahead of the next guy(especially the goyim) in news and information. Without the edge, Jews could lose out to middlemen competitors such as Greeks or Armenians. Then, it shouldn’t surprise us that World Jewry had a collective agenda and coordinated strategies in events like the Russian Civil War. While most goy elites were hell-bent on nipping the Bolsheviks in the bud, World Jewry thought otherwise and did everything possible to lend aid to the Reds. Consider how Winston Churchill, early in his career, noticed the obvious Jewish role in the Russian Revolution and sounded the alarm about Jewish radicalism. One thing for sure, the Bolsheviks could have been defeated if all the great powers had aided the Whites. And for a time, various Great Powers sent troops into Russia to do just that. So, why did they soon give up and let the Reds win? Did it have something to do with Jewish influence in those nations? After all, Jews controlled banking around the world, and politicians could be bought(or blackmailed by Jews who obsessively collected data on everyone). Also, with Jewish control of a large sector of the media, both intellectual ideas and public opinion could be shaped and swayed by the Jewish agenda. There is no question that World Jewry could work in coordination to target certain nations. Powerful Jews in banking, media, academia, and even the underworld had great pull among goy politicians(even ones who disliked Jews) because rich Jews spread the money around and could use the rumor mill of the media to defame those individuals deemed hostile to Jewish interests.
Now, Jewish Power in the period between World War I and World War II wasn’t what it is today, but Current Jewish Power seems like a fuller expression of eternalist Jewish Supremacist tendencies that had once been closeted. It's likely that Jews of earlier times felt much the same as Jews feel today, and the only real difference is that Jews back then were more careful not to ‘rock the boat’ lest the goyim get angry and ‘go Hitler’ on them. After all, Germany was considered to be one of the less ‘antisemitic’ nations in Europe. For a long time, France and Russia(including Poland as part of the Russian Empire) took the cake as the most anti-Jewish nations. In contrast, many Jews in Germany felt more accepted and assimilated. Then, why did relatively tolerant Germans become the most virulently anti-Jewish people in Europe? To address that question, we need to ask what did Jews do during the Weimar years when so many Germans were suffering. Many Jews were pimps, gangsters, and weasels. It’s often been asked, "Why did a people as intelligent, educated, and cultured like the Germans turn to something like Nazism? To answer this, one must also ask, "How did a people as intelligent, cultured, and possessed of long moral tradition as the Jews come to murder so many people with radical communism in Russia and spread filth & degeneracy among the Germans during the Weimar years?" After all, even though it is true that National Socialism did become an evil ideology that committed unpardonable crimes, it wasn't as if millions of Germans decided to just go crazy one day for the hell of it. Rather, they were reacting to hard times and ugly Jewish behavior. It was an over-reaction to be sure — like the US nuking of Japan and the plan to nuke 10 more cities if Japan didn’t surrender — but an understandable reaction to horrible Jewish behavior, just like US violence against Japan was a reaction to Japanese madness and aggression.
The problem with our understanding of Jewish responsibility in world affairs is due to the very point raised by Halsey English: Because Jews didn’t have a literal nation of their own(at least prior to the creation of Israel), all Jewish actions got bundled together with the actions of goy-majority nations. So, even though Jews were the main peddlers of opium to the Chinese, it just got bundled together with British Imperialism. And even though Jews played a key role in the Bolshevik Revolution, the rise of communism was seen as a ‘Russian’ thing. Now it’d be wrong to say Jews were the ONLY movers and shakers behind great historical events. British Imperialism would have existed without Jews, and there were plenty of non-Jewish radicals in Russia of various stripes. Also, even without Jews, socialism and anti-war politics would have been popular among Russians, most of whom were poor, backward, and tired of losing their sons to what seemed like a pointless unwinnable war(against Germany). Still, there is no doubt that Jewish bankers played a key role in financing much of Western Imperialism, for good or ill. And Jews were vastly over-represented among gangsters and underworld figures, something most people know little about because Hollywood has usually featured Italian hoods as gangsters. The book RED MAFIYA is a welcome corrective. (It took directors of Italian descent, especially Francis Ford Coppola with THE GODFATHER PART 2 and Sergio Leone with ONCE UPON A TIME IN AMERICA, to address the issue of Jewish gangsters.) Indeed, the fact that Jewish intellectuals, financiers, media people, and even gangsters all worked together to pressure the Great Powers(even the Soviet Union under Stalin) to support the Zionist Project was a tell-tale sign that Jews wielded immense influence around the world. Even when World Jewry couldn't wage war on certain nations/peoples on its own, they sometimes pulled the strings to make goy nations to do its bidding. Thus, the Jewish Hand was often gloved in Official Goydom. Unlike Jews today, Jews in the past didn’t have the dominant position in society, but they still had a lot of clout with goy rulers and elites, many of whom depended on Jewish money and connections in business. (And after WWII, what with the Holocaust gradually becoming the neo-religion of the West, Jews became like sacred objects in the Western Imagination, and Western Elites naively hoped that Jews would become oh-so-nice IF whites were to go out on a limb to hug Jews and weep. Jews didn’t reciprocate kindness with kindness but with contempt for soft-hearted and weak-willed goyim.) Therefore, even though Halsey English is correct to say there was no real nation called Judea to declare war on National Socialist Germany, there was nevertheless a worldwide Jewish network that constituted a Great Power in its own right. Indeed, this is the essential fact of globalism. Because Israel exists, many people(especially those on the far-right) tend to think Israel is the center of Jewish Power. Actually, it isn’t. Israel exerts great influence only because it is protected by World Jewry. After all, what would Israel be without US and EU support? And why do US and EU support Israel? Because Israel itself is all-powerful? No, it's because Jews in the US and EU have tremendous power. So, even if Israel were to vanish from this earth, Jewish power would still be immense because the Jewish globo-homo networks control so much of media, finance, and whore-politicians. While Jewish power from WWI to WWII wasn’t what it is today, it was still, pound for pound, the most powerful force back then as well. And because Jews had clout in many nations, it was difficult to defeat Jewish Power. Germans suppressed Jews in National Socialist Germany, but there were powerful Jews in France, UK, USSR, and the US. Germany conquered France, but there were Jews who had the ear of Winston Churchill who'd become dependent on Jewish money. And there were powerful Jews in the US. And even though Stalin purged many of the top Jewish Bolsheviks, the fact is there were lots of Jews in high places even during the Stalinist period. There were powerful Jews in capitalist nations and socialist nations. And prior to Italy’s alliance with Germany, 12% of Italian Fascists were Jews(even though Jews were just a tiny percentage of the Italian population; to be sure, most Jewish Italians of radical political bent were on the Left). So, Halsey English is technically right but essentially wrong about the nature of Jewish Power. This is why Jews today love globalism and hate nationalism(at least among goyim). Globalism means more power to the worldwide network and less power to goy nations to say NO to the George-Sorosian agenda. (Of course, Israel gets Passover exemption from condemnation of nationalism. Even as Jews denounce goy nationalism, they insist that all goy nations must support Jewish nationalism in Israel. To be sure, there are times when Jews will selectively support nationalism in goy nations, usually the case when Jews feel a need to pit one goy nation against another. So, Jews are okay with Ukrainian and Georgian nationalism against Russia. And Jews are okay with Polish nationalism as long as it’s directed against Russia. But Jews are not okay with Polish nationalism when it is directed against Third World invaders and Globo-Homo PC funded by Jews and executed by their cuck-collaborators.)
Now, returning to the topic of whether Jews started World War II, the answer is NO. World War II must be blamed on the megalomania of Hitler. And we must keep in mind that WWII really began with Germany’s invasion of the USSR. If not for that most unnecessary action, history books today would not be mentioning an event called 'World War II'. Jews didn’t force Germany to invade Russia. Hitler did that. Of course, one could make a roundabout argument and say Hitler attacked Russia because Jewish influence in UK made it difficult for the British to make peace with Germany. This school of thought says Winston Churchill, essentially owned by Jewish financiers, resolutely refused to come to peaceful terms with Germany and carried on with a pointless war in which neither side could win. And because Hitler could not persuade the UK with diplomacy, he decided to attack and destroy the USSR to send a clear message to the UK that it is all over, with Germans as the undisputed masters of All of Europe, in which case UK has no choice but to come to the peace table. This school of thought says Hitler admired the Anglos, wanted peace with UK, and sought equal partnership with the British in world dominance. Therefore, it would have made good sense for the Brits to ally with Germany. After all, Nazi Germany had no designs on the British Empire, and there was no people Hitler admired as much as the British. So, why did the British refuse to make peace with Germany, esp when Germany had no designs on British Imperial possessions? Some would argue that it was Jewish influence. Too many British politicians were under Jewish pockets. (There was also the factor of haute British contempt for vulgar displays of power by Nazi Germany. The manner of power mattered as much to the British as the power itself. During the war, Jews did everything to flatter the British sense of dignity that ideally shouldn't tolerate something so lowly and crude as Hitler and Nazis. Of course, AFTER the war, British Jews did everything to subvert the whole notion of British dignity as snobby and phony. So, British snobbery was good when directed at Germans but bad when used against pushy and irreverent 'money-grubbing' Jews.) Nevertheless, Hitler still wanted peace and partnership with the British, and the ONLY card he had left was to destroy the USSR. As long as the USSR remained(even as uneasy ally of Germany), the British would have tried to turn Stalin against Hitler. But if Germany defeated the USSR, then it was all over. Germany would have dominated all of Europe, and UK would have had no choice but to cut a deal with Germany that only wanted friendship with the British. (Even though Germany was allied with Russia and at war with England, Hitler's ideal hope was to be allied with racially 'superior' Anglos against the 'Asiatic' Slavs, whom Hitler really despised. Nazi Germany was like a man married to a woman he wanted dead while at odds with a woman he really wants to woo and marry. Anglos were a fatal attraction for Hitler.) This school of thought, promoted mainly by John Lukacs, may have some validity, but it requires too much speculative psychology as to ‘what Hitler was REALLY thinking’, something we will never know. What is absolutely clear is that Hitler gambled everything when he attacked the USSR that was an ally at the time. It was a spectacularly reckless decision, a risky zero-sum game. Once the invasion happened, Germany could gain everything or lose everything. Hitler went for double-or-nothing, and he ended up with nothing. So, despite circumstances in which Jewish power may have played a part, Hitler must bear the blame because he did what he didn’t really have to do. He was undoubtedly under pressure from UK(and the US), but he was not forced to invade the USSR. He did that of his own volition, and that’s when WWII really began and spelled eventual doom for Germany.
Anyway, even though J.F. Gariepy is dead wrong to say Jews started WWII by declaring war on Germany in 1933, he does have a point if we use ‘World War II’ in a looser way. If he means that World War II was the result of larger circumstances surrounding Europe at the time, there is some truth to this. But if one uses this line of argument, one can say the seeds of WWII were planted long before 1933. One can say Jewish role in communism was a declaration of war on traditional Europe. One thing for sure, it was the fear of communism that drove so many bourgeois and conservative elements in many European nations to support right-wing, reactionary, or fascist movements as the lesser evil. Surely, all such people heard of communist atrocities and Jewish role in Bolshevism, not least because ‘antisemitism’ wasn’t taboo back then. And given what communists, Jewish or otherwise, did to Christianity in Russia, many Christians(especially the Catholics) became fiercely anti-Jewish as well as anti-communist. Many people associated communism with men like Leon Trotsky and Bela Kun. Also, many(majority in some cases) communist leaders and intellectuals in nations like Germany and Hungary were Jewish. And during the Weimar Period, there was a Jewish War of Perversion on German Society. Jews were the leading pimps, gangsters, pornographers, and underworld figures just like Russian Jews came to dominate gangsterism and ‘white slavery’ in the post-Soviet period. https://redice.tv/red-ice-radio/weimerica-history-rhymes And then, there was the financial war during the Weimar period in which Jewish speculators with insider-knowledge rigged the system to rake in vast sums while so many ordinary Germans were on the verge of starvation. Jews will say this is all an ‘antisemitic canard’, but Jews did it again in Russia in the 90s, rigging and looting the entire economy to the point where a handful of Jewish oligarchs came to own 50% of Russian wealth. And we know what Jews did in the 2008 Wall Street meltdown. They got their whore-politicians, with puppet Obama at the helm, to bail out the ‘banksters’, the very people who'd been most responsible for the massive bubble. So, Jewish misbehavior tended to create a climate of distrust and hostility. If Jews hadn’t acted so radically ruthless in Russia and so greedily gross during Weimar Germany, a movement like National Socialism wouldn’t have come to power. While it’s wrong to blame EVERYTHING on Jews, Jews need to be accountable for their own actions. If not, goyim eventually scream 'Enough Is Enough' and seek out counter-radical solutions. If Jews don’t want goyim to be rabid and crazy, they themselves must stop being rabid and crazy. But Jewish Power insists on doing as it pleases while denouncing any reaction on the part of goyim that finally says NO MORE. None of this is to excuse Nazi craziness, and Hitler was a pathological nut. Some on the far-right seem to think ‘Hitler did nothing wrong’ because Jews were so rotten. But as the saying goes, "two wrongs don’t make a right". Jewish rabidness was wrong but so was German virulence. Ironically, both Judeo-centrists and far-right goyim think alike. Judeo-centrists think, "because Nazis were so evil, Jews were so perfect and innocent." As far as Jews are concerned, the fact that Nazis were evil meant that they must have targeted the most innocent and wonderful people, the Jews. Far-right goyim of antisemitic bent think, "Because Jews were so evil and vicious, Hitler and National Socialism must have been totally good because they waged war on Jewish-Evil." But such is fallacious thinking. Just because A is evil and B is against A, it doesn’t naturally follow that B is good. There are many cases of evil vs evil(such as Nazi Germany vs Soviet Union in WWII). Much of Jewish power has been on the side of evil, and National Socialism eventually manifested itself as a form of German Evil. Just like gangsters fight other gangsters, evil can fight evil. And the forces that led to World War II were German Evil and Jewish Evil. Too many Jews acted crazily as communist, financial thieves, pimps, and gangsters. The excesses of the Weimar Period led many Germans to support National Socialism as a socio-political restoration of health and decency, but as events made clear sooner than later, Hitler and his key cohorts were pathological nuts themselves. The dog that mauled the rabid Jew was rabid itself. It’s like the spread of hyper-rabies to everyone in David Cronenberg’s RABID. Jews and Aryans can both be rabid, and when their rabities rub against each other, the whole world can be engulfed in flames.
The proper lesson from WWII should be all peoples should take care not to grow rabid, but Jews never got the messsage. Germans and Japanese got this message and renounced imperialism and war. The GERMAN QUESTION, long a worrisome problem for other nations, was finally resolved with Germany deciding to become a 'normal nation'. Defeated by all sides and burdened with shame & guilt, Germans had no choice but to reassess themselves and arrive at a more balanced existence. Countless Germans and Japanese were killed in the conflict, and they learned their lesson. Millions of Germans and Japanese were victimized in World War II, but they also faced the fact that they’d victimized millions of other peoples. They paid a heavy price but also cost other nations dearly. It was a good lesson to learn.
Unfortunately, Jews never got the memo along those lines. By turning the Shoah into some kind of neo-religion, the Jewish Narrative is that of totally innocent, pure-as-snow, and wonderful Jews being attacked and killed by Nazis and other ‘anti-Semites’ for NO GOOD REASON. Jews overlook the fact that World Jewry constituted a great power in its own right. Even though Jews didn’t have a nation of their own, they had their claws sunk into several key nations that dominated much of the world back then. Jewish influence in US, communist Russia, UK, France, and etc. was considerable. And because Jews had close connections with some of the most powerful people in media, business, and politics, they could exert extensive influence. Also, there was a vast worldwide network of Jewish gangsters(who had close ties with Jews in the legitimate world). Indeed, even within Nazi Germany there was Jewish influence to persuade the regime to support Zionism. So, if Jews could exert some degree of pressure even on Nazi Germany, imagine the kind of pull they had in other nations. And much of Jewish financial meddling(then as now) was dirty and lowdown. When we take all of this into account, Jews weren’t just some innocent and hapless victims but ONE OF THE MAJOR PLAYERS in world power. Those who play with fire can get burned, and Jews got burned along with other peoples who also died in the 100,000s or millions: Germans, Japanese, Soviets, British, French, and Americans, all of whom were in the Game of Empire. (Indeed, the notion that the Empire of Japan attacked the US that only wanted peace is also hokum. While it’s true that most Americans were non-interventionist, FDR and Liberal elites were just itching for war and empire to pave the way for the American Century. Indeed, it was the US and UK that had been most instrumental in goading Japan early in the 20th century to join the Imperial Club as counterbalance to the Russian Empire and to suppress rising Chinese aspirations). Now, this doesn’t mean that all sides were equally to blame for WWII. Hitler and Nazi Germany were mostly to blame by far, and anyone who doubts this is a liar, fool, or retard. But it’s not like Germans decided to go utterly crazy in a sane world. Rather, Germans went crazy in a world filled with craziness, and Jewish Power was one of the craziest drivers of world madness, especially with communism in Russia and financial robbery & gangsterism in the West. If you torment a bear with a stick long enough, it might lose its temper and tear you limb from limb. Now, the bear was still wrong to overreact, but you wouldn’t be exactly innocent either. But Jews seem to think they have some divine right to beat people with a stick... and even shove a ‘rainbow’ stick up people’s arse. Today’s Jews, so full of themselves as the Holy Holocaust people, seem to think whatever they do is wonderful and anyone who reacts badly is an ‘anti-Semite’. So, never mind that Jewish globalists economically looted Russia in the 90s. Just pretend that Jews did nothing wrong, and how dare the Russians support a man like Vladimir Putin who is New Hitler because he restored some resemblance of national sovereignty. (Unlike Hitler and Nazis, Putin’s Russia is friendly to Jews and protects them. It only went after the worst of the Jewish oligarchs, BUT Jews are still fuming and up-in-arms because they favor even total a**holes Jews over goyim victimized by a**hole Jews).
Anyway, there is no denying that there was indeed a coordinated worldwide Jewish agenda to harm National Socialist Germany as much as possible. And from the Jewish perspective, it would have made sense since Hitler’s Germany was indeed virulently anti-Jewish to the point of blaming Jews even for things they weren’t responsible. From the viewpoint of Jewish power, pride, and honor, it was the most responsible and sensible thing for Jews around the world to unite in their anti-German campaign. After all, World Capital did much the same against the USSR. While there were capitalists(especially Jewish) who were sympathetic to the Soviet project, most of Worldwide Capital sought to strangle communism in its cradle. From the capitalist perspective, this was a most rational objective since communism’s stated goal was to stamp out private property. And of course, socialists and communists around the world formed Popular Fronts across many nations to build a worldwide bloc against capitalism and fascism. From the radical leftist perspective, capitalism was an evil form of exploitation that had to be stamped out to create heaven on earth for the Common Man. Therefore, all leftists around the world should coordinate their activism to subvert capitalism in every nation. Likewise, the perspective and policy of World Jewry were essentially rational and sensible on the basis of Jewish identity and interests. Given National Socialist Germany’s blatant antisemitism, why shouldn’t World Jewry have worked in concert to put forth a united front against Germany?
Now, one could argue that such efforts on the part of Jews further radicalized Nazi Germany and made it even more anti-Jewish. One might also argue that Germany felt cornered because of the Jewish-led campaigns, and this led to actions that were more out of exasperation than any diabolical plan to conquer the world. And there is a kernel of truth to this. If World Jewry had been less hostile and more accommodating to Germany-as-a-great-power, maybe Nazi Germany would have eased its policies on Jews. And maybe Germany would have been more willing to negotiate with other nations than go down the path of war. After all, ideological or racial enemies can be friends or allies on the basis of shared interests and compromise. Hitler had no love for the Asian race — indeed, one of his reasons for despising the Slavs was they were supposedly tainted with Asiatic blood — , but he formed an alliance with Japan. And Saudis and Israelis, despite despising one another, have formed an alliance against Iran. And the US and Red China came to see eye-to-eye on the Soviet Threat. So, maybe Jews should have been less hostile toward Nazi Germany and more diplomatic for the sake of pragmatism. After all, Germany was a great power(and getting stronger by the day), and as the Rolling Stones sang, "You Can’t Always Get What You Want." Besides, Jewish Power back then was considerably less than what it is today. Though Jews had access to key figures in many powerful nations, they still didn’t occupy the commanding heights that they do today. As such, even as they could pressure various nations to censure and condemn Germany, they had no means to making them attack and destroy Germany. Consider that when Leni Riefenstahl visited the US, she was welcomed by Walt Disney despite being snubbed by Hollywood moguls. And the powerful anti-war lobby in the US(heavily represented by German-Americans and many Wasps) was very effective in keeping the US out of conflagrations in Europe and Asia. It only took Pearl Harbor and Germany’s declaration of war on the US that roused enough Americans to support war. Given all these factors, maybe World Jewry was rash in overestimating its power to affect world events. It had a lot of power but not enough to destroy Germany. So, its overt hostility only emboldened the Nazi resolve to hurt Jews. But then, given Hitler’s character, it’s unlikely that a nicer approach on the part of Jews would have changed events much either. Hitler was the kind of psychopath who didn’t appreciate good will. He tended to see such as weakness or stupidity, and more often than not, he took advantage of the kindness of others. So, if Jews had taken a softer approach to Nazi Germany, Hitler would likely have wiped his feet on it like a doormat. But then, that is also a problem with Jews. There is something about the Jewish personality and character that ill-appreciates goodwill and kindness of others. Because Jewish culture developed to intellectually and economically dominate, any sign of goodwill on the part of goyim is usually seen as a weakness to exploit. Consider Jewish behavior in the Anglosphere world. Notice Jews gained the greatest success in Anglo-made nations, but Jews never show any appreciation, no gratitude. Instead, they spew endless bile at Wasps and Anglo-ized whites as the Source of All Evil. Jews would not be ruling the world today if Anglos hadn’t allowed them to piggyback on the triumphs of the British and American Empires. Without the Anglo Horse for Jews to ride, where would Jews be? But what do Jews do to the Anglo Horse? They dig their spurs into the Anglo flesh and show utter contempt(and pleasure at Anglo agony). Indeed, given Jewish behavior in the US and post-Soviet Russia, one can’t help that the National Socialists were at least half-right. They clearly went too far in their Jew-Hatred, and their genocidal campaigns cannot be justified on any grounds, but it’s about time we asked this question: If Jews, with their great power, recently did so much to harm White America and Russia with weapons of cultural degradation and financial robbery, why would Jews during the inter-war period have acted all that differently? Granted, a people’s attitude and behavior can change over time, but it’s also been the case that various peoples tend to exhibit certain dominant traits and behaviors consistently over time. So, whether under monarchy, democracy, National Socialism, communism, or capitalism, German people have tended to be disciplined, thorough, and efficient. In contrast, Russians have been known to be lazy, slovenly, and crude regardless of the dominant ideology. And people have noticed similar attitudes and behaviors in Swedes in Sweden and Swedish-Americans in the US. If such is true of goyim, it could also be true of Jews. And given Jewish behavior in the US from the 60s to the 90s — rancorous, subversive, nasty, irreverent, arrogant, contemptuous, venomous, hateful, hostile, and self-righteous — and in Russia in the 90s(what with all the gangsterism and financial swindling done in concert with Harvard Jews as ‘advisers’), would it be such a stretch that the same kind of attitudes and behaviors were prevalent among Jews in the Weimar period? Based on historical evidence(though often suppressed by Jew-run academia and media), there seems to be ample proof of Jewish bad behavior in economics and culture in Germany of the time. While some Jews were on the far left aiming for violent revolution, others were steeped in the most subversive and degrading manifestations of urbanism and capitalism. Jews dominated gangsterism, white slavery, pornography, and the drug trade. Also, Jewish power was doing much to create dissension among the goy populations. We see this today as Jewish media have long promoted feminism to drive a wedge between white men and white women. Jewish-controlled feminism tells white women that they are oppressed by white men and should side with People of Color. Also, Slut Feminism drives a wedge between young girls and parents. It tells young girls that they are ‘empowered’ if they dress and act like sluts who go with Negroes. And we know Jewish Power has been most instrumental in pushing the sickness of Homomania. Now, not all Jews are behind this, and many decent moral Jews are appalled by the madness, but the fact is the great majority of Jews are with the program. It’s like not all Germans were pro-Nazi, and many of them opposed Hitler’s madness, but they didn’t have to power to stop the wars and mass horrors. And there were anti-war Japanese who warned against militarism and imperial ambition, but they were in the minority and couldn’t stop the madness that led to destruction and defeat. Good decent Jews are in a similar strait. They want to stop the madness of crazy evil globo-homo Jews, but nearly all the elite Jewish power is globo-homo, and the great majority of Ordinary Jews support the crazy agenda. Granted, Jews are different from most groups. For example, only a small percentage of whites, blacks, and browns belong to the elites. Most goyim are just regular people. But given that 50% of Jews make $100,000 or more, a far larger percentage of Jews are in elite ranks. If, say, 5% of whites could be said to live in the upper-ranks of society, the figure is probably like 25%-30% for Jews.
Anyway, there is no doubt that Jews around the world, or World Jewry, have worked as a team against other groups. This doesn’t mean that all the powerful or consequential Jews were communicating 24/7 or hatching a plan in some dark room. Indeed, no such conscious collusion or conspiracy is necessary when so many people see eye-to-eye on things. On certain matters, even Jews who never met or know of one another’s existence could be doing the very things that culminate in actions in favor of Jewish interests. But this is true of any group. Most Muslims in the US never met one another and don’t know each other on the personal level, but on issues such as the Israel-Palestinian conflict or Muslim Immigration, a lot of Muslims all across the US will be saying and doing the very things that serve what they construe to be Muslim interests. So, even if a Muslim in Florida never met another Muslim in NY who never met another Muslim in Michigan, the kind of things they say and do will likely serve an interest that has special meaning and purpose for the Muslim Community. And this was also true of Anglosphere nations. Even though the US broke away from the British Motherland, and even though Canada, Australia, and New Zealand developed separately from the US(and eventually grew independent from Britain), they tended to be closer to another than with other nations because of the Anglo-glue. And prior to the Jewish-takeover of the US, there was a certain sentimentality among many Americans who regarded Great Britain as the motherland. So, despite the bitterness of the American War of Independence, the shared blood and culture made UK and US closer to one another than, say, the US and Mexico even though Mexico is closer to the US than UK is. So, even without conspiracies or conscious coordination, peoples around the world with bonds of blood and culture tend to, wink-wink, understand each other better and get along together. Same might be said of the World Sinery(or World Chinese). Even though there were bitter disagreements over ideology and economic philosophy between Mainland communist China and capitalist Hong Kong, Taiwan, & Singapore(and Overseas minority Chinese in Southeast Asian nations), at the end of the day, when the historical dust settled, there remained a kind of mutual understanding among the Chinese communities all over the world. This doesn’t mean that World Sinery all gather together in some banquet hall in Beijing to hatch some plot to dominate all of humanity, but it still means that many Chinese in the mainland and around the world feel an innate sense of Chinese-ness and Chinese interests that motivate them to think, speak, and act in ways that culminate in what amounts to Globo-Sino-Interests.
Then, why would it be any different with Jews? While it’s true that there is a network of powerful Jews all around the world — with globalism, worldwide communication is easier than ever, and Jews have been more invested in communication and news than most other peoples — , much of Jewish Power derives from the fact that many Jews instinctively act in ways that serve Jewish interests. So, many of these Jews don’t have to meet with other Jews or even know them on a personal basis. What matters is that most of them, even on their own, act in ways that are most beneficial to Jewish interests. So, one could be a Jewish professor in some elite college without direct connections to those Jews in the Deep State. But as a Jew, he may feel that Diversity serves Jewish interests because it gives the ruling Jewish elites the opportunity to play divide-and-rule among the goyim. So, in his role as professor, he may publish articles or teach classes that push Multi-Culturalism. And if he persuades a bunch of readers and students, he will have done his part in the interests of World Jewry. Or one could be a Jewish financial operator. He may not be part of any cabal or know anyone in Pentagon or Harvard. But, he may still donate a good sum of money to a Democratic candidate who pushes the Homo Agenda because he is convinced that the ‘gay agenda’ is good for Jews by promoting minority-centrism(where the majority comes under pressure to defer to certain select minorities, and of course, most Jews surely know that the Homo Agenda has been essentially funded by Jewish money and promoted by Jewish-run media). Even without conspiracy or elaborate collaboration, the actions of many individual can constitute an ethnic agenda IF most of those individuals are ethnocentric and mindful to say and do things that they deem to be good for the group or tribe. And in a way, elections work just this way. When you vote, you do it alone, and you don’t know most people who voted like you did. But if you voted for someone/something that you deem to be good for your people and if others of your ethnicity made similar decisions in the voting booths, then the cumulative effect of all those individuals is an ethnic agenda. Then, why would it not make sense that Jews around the world act in Jewish interests, especially since Jews have historically been more ethnocentric than other groups(indeed managing to survive as a distinct people in exiled diaspora), more informed of world affairs, and highly ambitious as a people. Surely, an ethnocentric people will use their knowledge to serve their own interests. And an ambitious(and even arrogant) ethnic group will try to achieve great power and privilege for itself. If Jews were lazy, low-IQ, unambitious, and lacking in strong identity(rooted in deep culture, history, and spirituality), then perhaps most Jews would show little interest in anything except short-term personal gratification. But in fact, Jewish pride has been rooted in the Covenant of blood, spirituality, and history. Given that kind of collective egotism — "We are the Chosen People of the One and Only God" — , why would it be surprising that Jews around the world would have a powerful sense of who they are, where they came from, and where they must go to remain one of the great peoples of the world? No people are as ethnically conscious as the Jews are, but then, no people get as touchy when people notice this powerful sense of Jewish interests(often at the expense of other groups). The only reason why Jews survived as a people and culture for 1,000s of yrs, especially in exile, is because they had a strong Covenant-Consciousness. In contrast, a people such as the Japanese didn’t have to try hard at being Japanese since Japan was isolated and safe for most of its history. A Japanese was naturally Japanese just by living in Japan and doing Japanese things. In contrast, Jews were surrounded by various other tribes and great powers always breathing down their necks. Even prior to the destruction of Jerusalem by the Romans, Jews were in a precarious condition as they neighbored so many other tribes and kingdoms. And over history, most of the Ancient Tribal identities have disappeared. Whatever happened to the Babylonians or Hittites? We don’t know. They just became some other people. Their identities weren’t strong enough. In contrast, Jews developed the most powerful identity via the Covenant and thereby outlasted many peoples who were many times more powerful than the Jews. This is a great feat of the Jewish people, but it has also made them arrogant and contemptuous of other peoples, the goyim, who lacked the Covenant. In the case of Christians, Jews came to hate them as the people who stole the God of the Jews. How dare the goy Christians, under the influence of renegade Jews who passed the fire of the Jews to non-Jews, pretend like they possess the New Covenant while blaming Jews for having killed the Son of God when, if anything, there would be no Jehovah to speak of if not for Jewish spiritual vision and sacred texts? So, while there’s no denying that the Jews are a great people, the terms of this greatness also made Jews a very difficult and dangerous people to the goyim. While there are good Jews and bad Jews — just like there is good and bad among all peoples — , the demands of the Covenant push even good Jews to favor collective Jewish Interests above all other interests. This constant psycho-cultural pressure encourages even good Jews to side with bad Jews than side with good goyim against both bad goyim and bad Jews. So, even as Jews demand that good goyim reject bad goyim, the good Jews don’t carry out their end of the bargain of casting out bad Jews. But can good Jews remain good when they are so close to bad Jews? If good tolerates the bad, it turns bad also. And then, if good goyiim join forces with good-Jews-gone-bad(by sticking closely with bad Jews), don’t even good goyim turn bad? Even if good goyim reject bad goyim, if their main allies(or masters) are good-Jews-gone-bad, they too will only end up serving the bad. This is why the world is so messed up. Jews say good goyim must say NO to bad ‘racist’ & ‘supremacist’ goyim and side with good Jews. But good Jews support bad Jews who practice ‘racism’ and ‘supremacism’ in the Middle East. If good Jews stick with bad Jews, aren’t they also bad? It’s like cops who work with gangsters are also, de facto, gangsters by association and cooperation. If good Jews stick with bad Jews and if good goyim stick with good Jews who stick with bad Jews, the end result will be both good goyim and good Jews doing the bidding of bad Jews. Goodness fades, and all that is left is Jewish badness. Now, we can argue as to what is really ‘good’ and what is really ‘bad’. We can argue globalism is the real evil, in which case nationalist Jews would be the good guys. Then, good nationalist Jews should condemn bad globalist Jews and work with good nationalist goyim against bad globalist goyim. But many staunch Zionists in the US, EU, and Israel who are all about nationalism for Jews will work closely with bad globalist Jews who are pushing for Open Borders in Europe and the West. During the ‘Refugee Crisis’, Israel(that refuses to take in any refugees) sent rescue delegations to Europe to welcome Arab ‘refugees’ and ‘migrants’ washing up on shores. https://www.israel21c.org/israaid-sending-team-to-help-refugees-in-europe/ So, good Jewish nationalists who support Israel as a Jewish state work with bad Jewish globalists to inundate the West with Muslim and African ‘refugees’. Again, if good works with bad, it too becomes bad. If ‘good’ Jewish nationalists act this way and refuse to condemn bad globalist Jews(and, if anything, work with them), what’s the point of good European nationalists working with ‘good’ nationalist Jews? If ‘good’ nationalist Jews are joined at the hip with bad globalist Jews, then any good European nationalist who is allied with ‘good’ Jewish nationalists will also be indirectly in service to bad Jewish globalists.
Anyway, the point is Jews, good or bad, tend to favor tribal power over universal principles EVEN as they demand that goyim reject ‘petty tribalism’ in favor of higher universal principles. But if Jews refuse to reject their own ‘petty tribalism’ and form a domineering alliance with goyim who have rejected their own tribalism and embraced universalism, the end-result will be a death knell for universal principles since goyim will have to support the tribalism of the Jews. Even though goyim will have forsaken their own identity, they will still be serving an identity because Jews will have clung to theirs. This is the current moral crisis of Globalism. No people preach more about universal principles than Jews do, but then, no people insist so much on the importance of their own identity and power as well. Jews tell goyim to trust Jews because Jews are so wise, idealistic, compassionate, and caring of all humanity. And the Jewish advice to goyim is "Abandon your identity & pride and embrace all peoples as part of one ‘human race’." Goyim trust Jews and follow up on the advice. Deracinated and Diverse, goyim are to no longer see color. But then, what is the Jewish demand on goyim? It is "Admire us Jews, serve us Jews, worship us Jews, kill for us Jews, die for us Jews, hate whomever we hate, endorse whatever we endorse, and etc." In other words, Jews aim to erase the identities of goyim not to end all tribalisms but to make all post-tribalists serve the one and only remaining Tribe, the Jews. Jewish message to White Christians is not, "You give up your white/Christian identity, and we’ll give up our Jewish/Semitic identity." Rather, it’s "You give up your white/Christian identity and come serve our Jewish/Semitic identity." Whites are to abandon their 'petty tribalism' to aid Jewish 'petty tribalism' in beating up Palestinians and other perceived 'enemies of Israel', a notion as malleable and fluid as the idea of 'hate speech'(which usually means whatever Jews hate). It’s like someone who says, "You take off your clothes while I keep mine on" or "You give up your money while I keep my own money... and take yours as well since you gave it up." This is down and dirty. So, yes, Jews are a great people, but it’s understandable why so many peoples have come to use the epithet ‘Dirty Jew’ because Jewish hustling, double-crossing, and backstabbing are truly venal and lowdown.
When we survey world events today, who can deny that World Jewry has worked together time and again to wage all sorts of wars, ranging from cold to hot? The main conflicts are not between Israel and its neighbors but between Jewish Globlalism and whatever stands in the way of total Jewish hegemony. Who can deny that World Jewry has pretty much declared war on Russia? This doesn’t mean Israel declared war on Russia. If anything, Israel and Russia have cordial relations as Jews often hedge their bets. But ever since Vladimir Putin rose to prominence and re-instituted some degree of national sovereignty & expelled the worst of the Jewish oligarchs, there has been a concerted effort among many powerful Jews around the world to isolate, defame, encircle, and strangle Russia. Jews should feel themselves to be lucky that Vladimir Putin isn’t someone like Adolf Hitler or Tony Montana. Indeed, Putin’s response to Jewish animus goes to show that Jewish hostility need not lead to a world war. Putin has remained sane & balanced and sought out closer ties with China and Iran against the power of US and EU controlled by Jews. Also, he has no imperialist ambition to conquer other nations. He even decided not to invade Georgia in 2008 despite Georgian provocations. So, just because World Jewry declares war on your nation doesn’t mean that your nation must engage in actions that lead to a world war. Jewish power is far greater now than in the 1930s, and Russia is feeling far more heat than Germany did from 1933. But notice that a world war has been avoided because Putin is a sane and cautious man. And Hitler could have played the game more soberly as well. The problem with Hitler was that, even as he resented Jewish pressures on Germany, his own ambitions were also on the dark side. He wasn’t just a German patriot trying to defend his fatherland from International Jews but a German imperialist whose grand ambition was as monstrous as that of the worst Jews. In contrast, Vladimir Putin has limited ambitions, which are mainly to safeguard Russia’s borders and revive a healthy traditionalist kind of nationalism. And one could say the same of the leaders of China and Iran, both of whom are far saner than rabid & virulent Jewish globalists and their pathetic craven goy cuck-collaborators.
Anyway, it is a fact that World Jewry orders hits on certain nations. In the case of Iraq, the Jewish Neocons, in collusion with Liberal Zionists and Israel, cooked up insane lies to manipulate the US, the lone superpower, into declaring war on Iraq and invading on false pretexts. So, yes, Jewish Power can be aggressive, imperialist, and pathologically destructive. It can be Nazi-like. But because Jews are now protected by American Power, the greatest in the world, they can get away with so much bad behavior. In retrospect, American invasion of Iraq was a far greater crime than Japan’s attack on Pearl Harbor. Japan, driven to desperation, sought to neutralize the US navy in Hawaii to buy some time to grab more of Asia from Western Imperialists. Japan too was a brutal and imperialist power, but it was fighting for its life and position in Asia. In contrast, the US was not threatened by Hussein’s Iraq. Furthermore, Hussein had nothing to do with 9/11 and, if anything, had done his part to suppress Jihadi terrorist elements in his country. So, what sound reason did the US have for invading Iraq? It was really to serve Israel’s interests in the region. Zionists wanted another modern Arab nation destroyed. Of course, even prior to the declaration of war and overt aggression by the US, there had been an economic war against Iraq that killed so many innocent women and children. The reasons given were about ‘human rights’, but this from a nation that aided Zionists in the Nakba progroms that wiped Palestinians off the map. Also, US had hardly cared about Hussein’s ‘human rights’ abuses in the 1980s when he was at war with Iran. In the case of the Iraq Invasion, Jewish Power used the US to overtly declare war. But Jews have used the US to declare de facto Cold War on Iran even though Iran, unlike Israel, has no nukes and allows inspections of its nuclear facilities. Also, what nation has Iran invaded recently? None. It has been far more peaceful with its neighbors than Israel with its. Even the Iran-Iraq War was started by Iraq(with encouragement from the US). Under Obama, the Jewish-controlled US and EU mobilized NATO to bring down Gaddafi and turn Libya into a hell-hole. And why would the US have worked with Israel, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey to funnel in Jihadis and weapons into Syria to blow up that country? Who was bound to benefit the most? Sure, Saudis and Turks had their own reasons, but why did the US get so closely involved? Do Saudis and Turks control US policy? No, Jews do. Jews made Obama mess up Syria because they thought a divided and tattered Syria would be good for Israel. And when all this mess led to massive migration-invasion into Europe by Muslims and Africans, World Jewry essentially declared demographic war on Europe. Soros and the Jewish-controlled World Media praised Cuckette Merkel as the moral leader of Europe for allowing the invasion and destroying her own country. So, there are various ways by which Jews declare war on other peoples. It can be overt(as with Iraq or Libya) or covert(as with Syria and Ukraine). And if not for Jewish power, would US-Russia relations really be so bad? I mean, what group in the US has this toxic animus against Russia? Eskimo-Americans? Mexican-Americans? Chinese-Americans? Cuban-Americans? Irish-Americans? Now, Polish-Americans may have some bitter feelings about Russians, but Catholic Poles do not control US media, finance, academia, and Deep State. It’s really the Jews. Jews hate certain nations & peoples and recruit the most craven cuck-puppet goy shitheads like John Bolton, Hillary Clinton, Nikki Haley, John McCain, Barack Obama, Joe Biden, Mitt Romney, and etc. to do their bidding. Just like Vito Corleone said "It was Barzini all along" in THE GODFATHER, we must say the ‘new cold war’ is about "It’s been the Jews all along." So, in the wider sense of Jewish War on Goyim, Jean-Francois Gariepy is right. If Jewish Power today wages wars, overt or covert, on so many perceived enemies of the Jews, why wouldn’t Jewish Power in the 1930s have behaved in a similar manner? And just like Israel expects the US to fight its wars, Jewish Power has often used proxies to get its way. Jewish power uses goy nations as hit-men or bouncers against other goy nations. In the 1930s, World Jewry did everything possible to turn the elites of UK, France, US, and USSR against Germany. Hitler was aware of this and came to hate Jews even more. Still, given his own crazy imperial ambitions and pathological hatred, he wasn’t merely reacting to Jewish hostility but actively trampling on the rights and freedoms of other peoples and nations. While he had every right to be angry with Jews and make counter-moves against the strategy of World Jewry, he didn’t have to invade Czech nation, grab half of Poland, and finally invade the USSR, then an ally. Hitler wasn’t merely reacting to events made worse by others — as Putin is currently doing against the moves of US & EU under Jewish control — but pro-actively encroaching on other nations to fulfill his own grand dreams of empire. And that is what J. F. Gariepy has chosen to overlook. Gariepy is right to say World Jewry did pull every trick in the book to set the great powers against Germany, and that Hitler took this badly and grew even more anti-Jewish than he already was. But this alone would not have led to World War II IF Hitler hadn’t nursed crazy imperialist ambitions of his own. Too often, because the Jews acted so terribly, there’s been a tendency among far-right lunatics to whitewash whatever Hitler did as heroic and noble struggle against evil Jews. But then, equally, there has been a total whitewashing of so much Jewish wickedness in world affairs because Nazi Germany acted so abominably and killed millions of Jews. Of course, the latter outlook is far more prevalent in our world that is so very much controlled by Powerful Jews with near-monopoly-stranglehold on key institutions and industries. Also, because Jews own the Narrative of their Holy Victim-hood that has become the ‘spiritual’ benchmark of Western Morality since the end of WWII, they wield influence even over industries and institutions that they don’t directly own or control. Because ‘antisemitism’ is such a cardinal sin in our Jewish-controlled world, even the richest white goy will find his enterprise and reputation destroyed by accusations leveled by Jews or their cuck-attack-dogs. While disgusting Jewish moguls like Sheldon Adelson can funnel billions of dollars into Zionist causes and projects(that do untold harm to Palestinians, Arabs, and others) without political opprobrium or outrage, imagine what would happen to Bill Gates if news came out that he personally donated a mere $100 to Richard Spencer’s NPI. All the Jew-controlled media and their brainwashed cuck choir would howl for Bill Gates’ head and destruction of Microsoft, in which case Gates will either be destroyed or just barely salvage his reputation and company by profusely apologizing, sucking Jewish cock, and donating billions to Zionist causes and for building more Holocaust Museums. Here we see the power of prophets over profits. People don’t live on bread alone. They want to feel righteous, and those who control the terms of righteousness control the hearts and minds of the elites and the masses. This is most evident in the power of Homomania, which is surely one of the most interesting(as well as diabolical) social experiments of all time. Jewish Power decided to consecrate homosexuality into some kind of angelic holiness sparkling with ‘rainbow’ colors. Spread via media and academia, so many people came under the proselytization of ‘gay rights’ into Gay Rites. Homosexuality went from a mere deviant lifestyle to be tolerated into a human condition that is next-to-godliness. It became something to be righteous about, and of course, when people feel righteous about something, they grow intolerant and hateful toward anyone who won’t share in the ‘spiritual’ passion. It becomes a matter of "We are Born Again because we worship Holy Homo, whereas you are cursed with ‘homophobia’." Now, what is Homomania but a Jewish Culture War on the world? It is a war on normality, biology, Christianity(and all great spiritual traditions), goy morality & decency, and majority power & dominance. It is a Culture War, Moral War, and Spiritual War in favor of Minority Supremacism of Jews and homos against non-Jews and Straights. The fact that so many people around the world fell for this globo-homo Jewish filth goes to show how much the world has been hollowed out by the spread of soul-eviscerating Pop Culture and mind-scraping PC, both of which are mainly controlled by Jews.
So yes, J.F. Gariepy is right about the way of World Jewry. It is a great power in its own right, and it will go to any lengths to wage wars, overt or covert, political-financial-cultural, against whatever and whomever they don’t like. We see this now in the tensions between US and Russia, Iran, & Syria. And who can deny that US has been at war against the pitiful Palestinians since the Nabka pogroms. No matter what the Zionists did to crush Palestinians, the US has been right there alongside Jewish power. So, we need to be very much aware of Jewish power, its nature, and its agenda. But that still doesn’t mean that the hostility of World Jewry against National Socialist Germany beginning in 1933 made World War II inevitable. If Jewish nastiness necessarily leads to World Wars, then there would be a world war between the US & EU and Russia, Iran, and China. Granted, it’s possible that Jews are now so confident of their control of US and EU that they will use their cuck-proxies to instigate the first military strikes against Russia, China, and Iran, in which case we can truly blame the Jews for starting World War III. But that is, as yet, far from certain, not least because the leaders of Russia, China, and Iran, unlike Hitler, have played the game sanely and responsibly against the dangerous moves of the globo-homo Judeo-Nazis. But in the case of Nazi Germany, Hitler played a crucial role in pushing events to the brink of World War and then pushing them all the way to total destruction. Hitler didn’t merely push back against Jewish power but pushed way beyond to realize his own insane dreams of a Nightmare Empire.
