The Great Anomaly? Just when the US was rejecting 'Racism' among white Americans, It was promoting 'Racism' among Jewish Zionists — The Main Source of Double-Standards in America is Both Parties have allowed to Jews to do as they please in the upper echelons of power

People talk of double-standards, and it's true that double-standards apply to different groups and individuals. Democrat leaders get to encourage BLM riots and face no consequences. Antifa scum go free. The Antifa and other scum who were rounded up for burning a limousine and committing other acts of vandalism in the 2017 Inauguration were all set free. The community college professor who bashed someone's skull got a slap on the wrist from the California court. Antifa can attack Proud Boys, but when Proud Boys fight back, the police only arrests the latter. Twitter and other platforms turn a blind eye to hatred expressed by blacks, Jews, and the like but force a ban those who speak up for whites and Christians.
But as the saying goes, "Fish rots from the head." So, why should it surprise us that double-standards define American Justice when they are entrenched in the highest echelons of power and with total support of both parties and their mass supporters? The biggest double-standard that defines America from top to bottom is the supremacism of Jews and the pervasive favoritism they enjoy from all quarters. Both the Democrats and Republicans have been totally complicit in this. All races and ethnic groups have been complicit as well, out of fear, cowardice, pressure, philosemitism, or money(as Jews have plenty of cash to throw around).

Do most so-called 'liberals' raise alarm when their elected politicians favor Jews uber Palestinians even though Jews stole Palestinian Land and continue to occupy West Bank and steal more of it? Do most so-called 'conservatives protest when their elected politicians favor Jews uber Palestinians? No, both the politicians and the people who vote for them are not only complicit in this grave injustice but feel hardly any guilt or pangs of conscience.

When the uppermost echelons of power act like this and not only get away with it but have the total support of both parties, why should anyone be surprised that double-standards(especially as devised by Jews) are such a prominent feature of America? All these 'conservatives' and patriots bitching about double-standards... well, where the hell were they when Donald Trump was hailing Israel and praising Jews regardless of what they do? Sadly and pathetically, most 'conservatives' and a good number of patriots were cheering the Jews/Israel First line while mocking the grievances of Palestinians.

So, if anyone wants real credibility on the issue of equal justice and rule of law, he or she must address that the US practices double-standards at the very top, with Jews in effect doing as they please with full compliance of craven goy elites, and that most certainly includes Donald Trump who, like Bill Clinton and Barack Obama before him, pardoned some of the sleaziest lowlife Jews that ever walked the Earth. So, before white conservative males spout off about how Joe Biden, as the puppet of Jews, is putting whites(and especially white males) in the back of the bus, they should have some self-awareness and ask themselves, "Why did we support Jews in their agenda to dispossess, murder, humiliate, and destroy the Palestinian people, land, and culture when Palestinians did NOTHING to us? Why was it okay to force Palestinians to the back of the bus when it came to US foreign policy and 'human rights'?
And if the destruction of an innocent people was just fine with white conservatives(indeed with them patting Jews on the back and kissing their ass), why are they now so upset that Jewish Power is now doing to them what it did to the Palestinians... with the full support of white conservatives?" Indeed, why was Palestinian Nakba a great thing but White Nakba is a bad thing? If you happily fed your next-door neighbor to an alligator, should you be complaining when the alligator comes for you next? Did you expect gratitude from the alligator? Alligators exists to devour everything, and Jewish Supremacists are determined to enslave and control goyim. You can no more bargain with Jewish Supremacists than with Nazis or the Terminator. Of course, most Jews won't admit as much, and the majority of Jews don't believe they are supremacist, but if Jews are judged by what they DO as opposed to what they SAY, they are totally supremacist and 'exceptionalist'. So, any 'conservative' or patriot who refuses to address this problem — Jews and cuck-goyim have instituted double-standards in favor of Jews at the highest stratums of power — should just shut up about double-standards at the lower levels of society. It's like complaining the river is foul without acknowledging that the source of the river itself is foul. It's like complaining about the symptoms of cancer without ever naming the cancer.

Indeed, isn't it odd that just when the US was moving toward a single-standard on one matter, it was also moving toward a double-standards on another matter? In the 1950s and 1960s, the US decided that Segregation and Racial Discrimination were wrong. There had to be a same set of rules for both whites and blacks(and measures had to be taken to enforce these standard for the latter). The idea was the American History was marred by two sets of rules, one that advantaged whites and disadvantaged everyone else, especially blacks. Given that the US was founded on principles of freedom and the proposition that 'all men are created equal', it was deemed not only wrong but shameful that America had for so long failed to enforce equality under the law for all peoples.

And yet, exactly at the same time, the US was moving toward a Jews-uber-Arabs policy, one of double-standards where Jews were free to do anything while the Palestinians/Arabs were called foul on just about everything. The American nation was loudly atoning for its past sins of racial discrimination and favoritism while, at the same time, totally prioritizing one group's ruthless dispossession, oppression, and dehumanization of another.
Worse, US support of Israel defied all foreign policy norms. It was nothing new for the US to have morally dubious allies, but it was in the name of national interest, aka realpolitik. As FDR said of a certain foreign leader, "He's a son-of-a-bitch but our son-of-a-bitch." Also, the Cold War necessitated that US form alliances with unsavory allies to form a bulwark against the Soviet Empire. But, this logic hardly applied to US support of Israel as the sensible and practical thing would have been to form alliances with the Arab/Muslim world against the Soviets. If anything, the US support of Israel was the main reason why several key Arab states allied with the USSR. Furthermore, the US had no reason to do any favors to Jews who'd been among the most radical, seditious, subversive, and hostile elements in the US. Not only were Jews prominent in organized crime but in espionage for the Soviet Union. Even the idealistic reason, or idealpolitik, didn't pass muster upon scrutiny as the Jews had taken the land from another people, one that had no role in the Holocaust. But the combination of Jewish Money & Media power, Christian sentimentalism, chutzpah, Wasp deracination, and awe of Jewish Genius led the US to favor the Jews regardless of what was being done to Palestinians.

This was the Great Contradiction or the Great Hypocrisy of the US in the second half of the 20th century. Just when it was proclaiming to be moving away from the bad old ways of favoring the white race over non-white races, it was doing everything to favor Jews & Zionists over Palestinians, Arabs, and Muslims regardless of morality, ethics, and principles. Whites had to be equal with other races, BUT Jews could be superior to Palestinians(and eventually over all other goyim, which is the current state of affairs in America). Jim Crow was bad, but Jim Crowitz was okay. South African apartheid was evil, but Israeli apartheid mustn't even be mentioned. Of course, Jews could get away with it as the Civil Rights was a domestic issue whereas the Arab-Israeli Conflict was a foreign matter(though Israel today hardly counts as a foreign nation but the symbolic metropole to which America must pay tribute).

On the other hand, American opinion on the Vietnam War came to parallel developments in the nation itself, and when Muhammad Ali, perhaps the most famous black person in the 60s after MLK, chose prison instead of service, it gelled in the minds of many that the white 'racism' toward blacks and American 'imperialism' in Vietnam were two sides of the same coin: The Cowboys and Indians view of the world where whites were justified in conquering, killing, and triumphing at any cost. Indeed, not a few Jews drew parallels between US war in Vietnam and the Holocaust, as if the US had become the new nazi nation. So, if American view of foreign policy and American view of domestic issues could merge into a common thread with Vietnam, why didn't this happen with the Arab-Israeli Conflict as well? One might say it was because the Vietnam War was intense and involved 100,000s of servicemen(and 55,000 deaths), whereas the US was not militarily involved in the Middle East(except for Israel's attempt to sink the USS Liberty and pretend it was an accident, with total complicity of the US media, even then dominated by Jews). Curiously enough, MLK also took money from Jews and supported the Zionist 'genocide' of Palestinians. The irony is rich. He marched for equal rights in the US and denounced America's 'racist' war in Vietnam, BUT he was totally onboard with Jewish supremacism and imperialism against the Palestinians and Arabs. Hmm. His hypocrisy sort of betrayed what Jews were really up to.

But then, whereas the Vietnam War ended for the US by 1973, the Arab-Israeli Conflict lingered in the headlines all throughout the 80s, 90s, and beyond, though far less since the Zionists consolidated near total control in the West Bank and the Jew-run media began to look the other way. And through all those years, despite pro-Zionist bias in the media and US politics, surely any perceptive American could have noted that Palestinians had legitimate grievances and not only lost their nation but their remaining territories were being stolen by Jews. Today, Jewish Caravans freely enter West Bank and carve up more territory with virtually no opposition from US politicians. (And whenever Trump mentioned Israel, conservatives and populists cheered loudly for the double-standards favoring the Jews.)
So, whereas Vietnam just became a memory after the war, the Arab-Israeli Conflict was always in the news. Furthermore, South Africa became very big news in the 80s and 90s, especially with the sanctions/boycott movement. And because Apartheid South Africa and Israel were the closest allies, one didn't have to be a rocket scientist to see the parallels between the conditions of blacks in South Africa and of Palestinians in Israel & West Bank. And yet, Mandela was anointed whereas Arafat continued to be portrayed as a 'terrorist'. And the great majority of American Jews denounced South Africa while simultaneously demanding that US support Israel's repressive and discriminatory practices against Palestinians.

So, despite media bias, there was enough news and information out there for Americans to realize what was happening to the Palestinians and how it paralleled America's historical 'sins' of slavery of blacks and 'genocide' of the Indians. And yet, Americans never made any real effort to take notice(which goes to show that American Moralism is mostly the product of external pressure than internal conscience). They just pretended to see Jews as forever Holocaust People even though Shoah was carried out by Europeans, not by Palestinians who, however, were made to pay the price. And any attempt to bring some measure of balance was thwarted in both parties by Jewish money; it had to be Jews uber Arabs.
Black Democrats who complained were soon bought off or defamed. The 'Arabists' in the GOP were soon shunted aside by Zionist Neocons for whom the red carpet was rolled out. As the Western Right was more tainted with 'racism' and 'antisemitism', American Conservatism wooed the white Jews(as blacks were a bridge too far) over to the GOP as the more pro-Jewish Party.
Of course, the main reason for GOP's support of Jews against Palestinians was hardly different from the racially discriminatory policies of the past. Jews were seen as fellow whites whereas the Arabs were deemed the brown Other, aka 'sand niggers'. And Jews took advantage of this even while secretly loathing American Conservatives as crypto-Anti-Semites. And then, there were Evangelicals who had both racial and spiritual reasons for favoring Jews over Arabs. Jews were revered as the People of the Book(though slated to be wiped out when Jesus returns)whereas Muslims were just heretics. But what about Arab Christians? Well, they were the brown Other and less worthy than white Jews. Due to the Civil Rights Movement and canonization of MLK, it became racially taboo for whites to be anti-black, but they could transfer their racial animus toward brown Arabs via Zionism. Besides, the Holocaust Narrative made it convenient to support Zionist oppression of Palestinians in the name of defending Jews from Another Holocaust being hatched by Arabs as the 'new nazis'. It all became so disingenuous.

Yet, was the Great Contradiction really a contradiction? On the surface, it would seem so: A case of Jews denouncing white 'racism' against blacks but demanding that the US unconditionally support Zionist 'racism' against Palestinians in Israel(and even Wars for Israel that have led to deaths of innumerable lives); also, a case of White America making a big show of how it's seen the light and is on bended knees to atone for what was done to non-whites, especially blacks, while, at the same time, deliriously championing Israel's ruthless and supremacist policies of racial domination over Palestinians and Arabs.
One may ask why the Jews, who were the most vociferous white leaders of the Civil Rights Movement and the biggest critics of white 'racism', were also the most zealous proponents of US policy that must always favor Jews/Zionists over Palestinians/Arabs/Muslims regardless of whether Jews are in the right or in the wrong. Why is it that Jews, who condemn the view that white lives are more precious than black lives, push policies that clearly insist that a single hair on a Jew is more precious than a thousand Arab lives? An insane contradiction?

And yet, the contradiction isn't such a contradiction if we dig a little deeper. Beneath the surface rhetoric, both Jewish support of black civil rights and Jewish suppression of Palestinian rights are of a kind designed to favor Jewish Supremacism. There is an inner-consistency beneath the outer-contradiction. In truth, Jews pushed the Civil Rights Movement in the US not because they cared about blacks but because they regarded White Christians as their main rivals(even enemies) for power. So, Jews were less motivated by altruism and sympathy(though some were) than by Jewish Supremacism that needed to topple whites and put them in their place. As white goyim greatly outnumbered the Jews, the most effective way was to demoralize whites with 'white guilt', which could be instantly disseminated to millions of white hearts-and-minds via the electronic media controlled by Jews. Just broadcast ROOTS a bunch of times, and whites will feel real sorry.

So, to Jews, blacks were less a people than a moral cudgel to beat whites with. Of course, blacks were also useful to Jews because, being tougher and stronger, they could rob the white man of his 'iconic' status in the pantheon of American Manhood. So, blacks were essentially a weapon for Jews to use against whites, not so much to bring about racial equality for all but to pave the way for eventual Jewish Supremacism. With whites demonized & demoralized and therefore sucking up to Jews and blacks for atonement, who would stand in the way of Jews for total supremacy? And indeed, that's exactly what happened through the years. Also, with blacks as bribed and dependent allies of Jews and with whites as guilt-ridden cucks(who worship Jews as the holy holocaust people), Jews had a free hand and could do as they pleased in the Middle East. Though some blacks may see the wrongness of what is going on, they are too dependent on Jews for money and media support; besides, what blacks care most about is "what's mine!" So, Jews can pose with blacks as the two great victim groups: The Holy Holocaust People and the Sad Slavery People. And what with whites burdened with Holocaust Guilt and Slavery Guilt, they dare not expend any sympathy on the Palestinians as every last ounce of compassion must be reserved for Jews(and blacks and then homos). It's the Guilt Tax. Of course, as Jews control the Narrative, people don't know about all the evil things Jews have done throughout history, and so, Jews are exempted from any burdens.

So, just like Tom Hagen says Hyman Roth played the Pantangeli Affair beautifully, it seems the Jews played the game masterfully. By feigning sympathy for blacks in the Civil Rights Movement, Jews gained the alliance of blacks and the moral servitude of whites plagued with 'white guilt' about blacks in the US and about Jews in World War II. That made it foolproof for Jews to do as they pleased in the Middle East and North Africa, finding any excuse to topple nations, kill countless people, tyrannize the Palestinian population(like Spartans did with the Helots), and act like nasty Judeo-Nazis. Jews sure know how to play the world like a game of chess. But with truth and honesty, we can expose them for what they are. Truth is to evil what light is to vampires.

Whites keep losing to Jews because they approach one another differently. Jews look upon whites with fear, suspicion, hatred, and paranoia. Jews see whites as the rival, even enemy, that must be defeated and subjugated. Just read the anti-white rants of Tim Wise and other Jewish Supremacists posing as 'human rights' activists. And so, Jews look for the most vulnerable spots, the Achilles Heels, of whites to make them bleed and fall. Jews have 20/20 vision on whites as the people who must be conquered and enslaved. Jews play the game.
In contrast, whites approach Jews as their best friends and wisest teachers. Whites look upon Jews with reverence, admiration, and trust. Whites see Jews as the best of the best, a people so wonderful that whites must be willing to sacrifice their own lives to protect Jews(though the idea of Jews sacrificing their own lives to save goyim is hilarious to them). So, whites never look for the Achilles Heel of Jews but use all their power to shield Jews from any sling or arrow. In other words, whites shield Jews who stab them in the back. Whites have blinders on that prevent them from seeing the Jews as the rival or enemy. So, even when the Jew attacks whites, whites don't see the Jew but see the Russian, the Chinese, the Iranian, the Arab, the Palestinian, the whatever. Whites constantly seek to scapegoat others because they are incapable of seeing that it's the Jew who is behind White Demise or White Nakba. But then, even many who do see the Jews know that the current climate is such that it's career suicide to name the Jew. Furthermore, Jews are not only going after your jobs but your bank accounts. The denial is funniest among white guys who talk loud and act tough, like Alex Jones. He acts like a barbarian-he-man, but whenever Jews kick his ass, he blames the 'Chicoms'. The Jew must be named because nothing is possible without doing so.

DON'T CALL THEM "DOMESTIC TERRORISTS", I'M SYRIAN LET ME TELL YOU ABOUT TERRORISM!

PMB Factor or Why Jewish Psychology Makes It Nearly Impossible for Non-Jews to Co-Exist Alongside Jews in Good Faith. PMB = Pedestal, Mirror, and Buttplug. GOMB or Get Off My Back, a Necessary Message to Jews from Whites.

It should be obvious by now to all honest and sensible people that Jews are a deeply problematic people. Now, all peoples are problematic because life itself is problematic, a matter of chaos, confusion, struggle, and survival. Just like all organisms have developed their own specialties to gain an edge in their niche, every human group has had to be more than 'nice' and kind to survive in what has mostly been a harsh world. Still, just like some organisms are more threatening than others, certain human groups are more difficult than others. African honey bees, for instance, are far more aggressive than European honey bees. African elephants are more aggressive and dangerous than Asian elephants. Weasels are feistier animals than muskrats. Some snakes are venomous, many are not. Dragonflies and butterflies are mild compared to hornets. Among dogs, some breeds are more dangerous than others. Among cats, orange tabbies tend to be more aggressive than long-haired black cats. Then, it shouldn't surprise us to realize that some human groups are more problematic than others. This is largely a matter of personality but also linked to levels of intelligence, aggression, strength, neurosis, and/or psychopathy. It also has to do with general egotism within the group.

Two racial/ethnic groups that are most problematic are Jews and blacks. To be more specific, it's the Ashkenazi Jews, ones who are half-European, who are more problematic than other kinds of Jews. Not only do they have problematic personalities but they have advantages and deficiencies that drive many of their members half-mad. Jews are rightly seen as pushy, feisty, and weaselly, but the problem is compounded by the fact that they're more intelligent and less attractive. (Being more intelligent, Jews think they should rule the world but resent the fact that too many goyim regard them to be unattractive and unappealing.) Blacks are rightly seen as loud, crude, and obnoxious, but things are made worse by the fact that they are tougher and less intelligent. (Being tougher and louder, blacks think they should rule the world but resent the fact that their limited IQ prevents them from rising to the top of everything.) And then, there is the matter of egotism that runs wild in both communities that do not lack for know-it-all bigmouths. The egotism also blinds many Jews and blacks to their shortcomings and failings.

In a way, Jews and blacks are mirror-opposites of one another, and in a hypothetical world composed of only Jews and blacks, they would not get along at all. Blacks will try to beat up Jews and rob/rape them, and Jews will use their wits to devise means and ways to enslave and even exterminate blacks. But because both groups rely so much on parasitism on Whitey as the commonly shared host, they've developed a symbiotic relationship. Also, having developed in close proximity with whites, both groups have suffered under whites and gained so much from the complex relationship. Consider what blacks gained under other blacks or under Arabs compared to what they gained under whites. Consider what Jews gained under/with Arabs or other-non-whites to what they gained under/with/over whites, especially Northern European whites.
Indeed, Jewish Global Power is inconceivable without its hooks deep into Anglos and Germanics. While Jews gained great advantages all throughout Europe and Middle East, their power was always limited within the bounds of ability of the host. In other words, while Jews in the Ottoman Empire did better than many groups, they could not surmount the limitations of Turkish civilization. Same goes for Jews in Russia. Jews could rise to the top in Russia, especially in the early stages of Bolshevism, but their worldwide influence was hampered by the problems of Russian national character(and failings of communism, of course). Jews gained a great deal in Italy and France, but both nations were surpassed by Anglo and Germanic nations that really came to define the future of the West. It's like a rider, no matter how talented, is only as good as the horse he is riding. If the horse is weak, no amount of experience and knowledge on his part can turn it into a great horse. Worse, if he has no emotional or moral connection to the horse, he may decide to exploit and abuse it for all its worth and dispose of it sooner than later. Jews understood that the strongest horses in the West were Anglo and Germanic. It was the UK, Germany, and the US. German Jews gained more than all other Jews with the exception of those in the UK and US. This is why Jews reacted to badly to National Socialist Germany's rejection of World Jewry. Would Jews have reacted so violently to a lesser nation saying NO to Jews? After the creation of Israel, many Arab nations expelled their Jews, but World Jewry didn't mind at all. They were happy to have those Jews come to Israel. Furthermore, they didn't see it as a great loss because Jews in Arab nations wouldn't have amounted to much because Arabs could never amount to much. So, Jews in Arab nations were atop weak horses. Jews see goyim as in terms of strong horses or weak horses. That's the esoteric meaning behind Steven Spielberg's WAR HORSE.

How Jews see the white race.

Just like Jews know that blacks are the superpowers in sports, and therefore, Jewish-owned teams in NBA and NFL must recruit top blacks to have championship teams, they know that Northern Europeans, especially Anglos and Germanics, are the most formidable civilization-builders, nation-enrichers, and imperial managers. Thus, Jewish Power relies on access to Anglo and Germanic nations. This is why Jews fear the rise of white identity and white interests among Anglos and Germanics. Even though Nazism turned out to be evil and monstrous, it had many positive sides as well, and one was the theme of liberation and emancipation(from maniacal Jewish control) before the movement turned into one of enslavement and extermination of the peoples of other nations. Before National Socialism went off the rails as Germano-Supremacist Imperialism, its main appeal was the hope of national liberation from World Jewry who, during the Weimar Years, exploited and debauched the German nation. If Adolf Hitler had the sense of limits of Kemal Ataturk or Vladimir Putin, he would have been one of the greatest men of the 20th century, indeed in all of European history. But he betrayed the initial hopes of National Socialism by igniting wars to conquer and exploit other peoples. But then, one problem of National Socialism was it was a radical Germanic version of Jewishness. In the fight against the Jews, Germany would use many of their tactics.

Anyway, the reason why Jews reacted so hysterically to the rise of National Socialism was because they regarded Germany as one of their prize horses. If a weak horse throws off the rider and runs away, it's no great loss. But if a strong prize horse throws off the rider and flees, it's a huge loss. It's the difference between a fisherman losing a sardine and losing a marlin. It's like there's a big difference between losing a plain lover and a beautiful lover. Now, if Jews have such problems with Germans and Anglos, why don't they just leave and go live with other peoples? The thing is, despite the problems, Jews know deep down inside that Jewish Power could only have risen to global greatness atop the backs of Anglo and Germanic prowess. It's like a Jewish owner of the NBA or NFL cannot hope to win the championship without black players. If blacks are the prize horses of Jews in American sports, whites folks(esp Anglos and Germanics) are their prize horses in the global struggle for hegemony. This is why Jews fear the awakening of white consciousness that wants to be free of the JSP(or Jewish Supremacist Power) on its back. When Jews rant about 'white supremacy', it is pure projection because what they're really about is ensuring White Submissivism to Jewish Supremacism. What Jews fear most is White National Liberation and White Global Liberation. White Liberation will save not only the white race but the whole world that is being trampled and destroyed(militarily and immorally) by the Jewish rider atop the white horse. Just consider Libya and Syria under the hoofs of the white horse ridden by JSP. White Liberation will not only save whites from vicious Jews but will spare the whole world from the misuse of the white horse in the hands of Jews. White people must stop being horses of the Jews and become human again. White people must tell the JSP or Jewish Supremacist Power, "Get Off My Back!" It isn't right for Jews to use white folks as their prize horse and war horse. GOMB or GET OFF MY BACK must be the mindset of white folks when it comes to Jewish Power.

Now, the question of why Jews are so difficult. The main reason is the PMB Factor, or Pedestal-Mirror-Buttplug Factor. It is why no amount of goodwill and kindly gestures on the part of whites is likely to change the atrocious Way of the Jew. Many white people believe that Jews will reciprocate in kind if whites treat them real nice. The thinking is that white Christians had wronged Jews for many centuries and then there was the Shoah, and that's why Jews are still overly sensitive, suspicious, and a bit paranoid. Therefore, if whites change their ways and shower Jews with love and kindness, Jews will eventually mellow out and learn to love whites as well.
Granted, there are some whites who are slavish to Jews out of sheer awe. This awe could be religious, as with Christian Zionists who believe Jews are the Chosen of God, and therefore, those who suck up to Jews shall be blessed while those who mistreat Jews will be condemned. Well, whites have been sucking up to Jews since the end of World War II, and what has been the result for the West? Rise of Sodomania as the new faith, anti-white dehumanization, monstrous wars for Israel, and massive demographic replacement.
Now, these Christian Zionists may feel more fortunate than Arabs and Muslims whose worlds have been torn asunder in recent years. They may feel whites are better off than Arabs because whites suck up to Jews whereas Arabs give the middle finger to Jews. God rewards whites, punishes Arabs. But until late modern history, Arabs had been kinder to Jews, but it was the 'antisemitic' white world that rose to greatness. And the reason why Arab nations have been smashed in recent years is because venal Jews have exploited the power of the white horse to trample on other nations. Even though white nations don't lay in ruins like Arab nations, their fate will be far worse than that of Syria or Iraq in years to come because Jews are pushing for mass Afro-Islamic invasion of Europe. But because Christian Zionists are so in awe of Jews, they don't have the wherewithal to speak the truth and name the Beast.
But not everyone in awe of the Jews is a Christian Zionist. Plenty of them are libertarians, materialists, and status-seekers who naturally look up to whomever happens to be the richest and most powerful. These cuck-collaborators will betray anything and even sell their mothers down the river for their slice of the pie. They are like Ned Beatty in SUPERMAN angling for a piece of California as 'Otisberg'. Indeed, what is a political libertarian but someone who worships the rich and powerful as the Best Individuals? While social libertarians are mainly concerned with freedom to indulge in sex & drugs, political libertarianism is all about sucking up to money. Its archetypal practitioner is the cucky-wuck Paul Ryan who bows down before the JSP(Jewish Supremacist Power) and kisses its ass because he is so in awe of Jewish money and power. As its pet, he gets doggy biscuits for which he is oh so grateful. Most college-Republican organizations are grooming centers for political libertarians whose main aspiration is to be useful for Jewish-Power-and-Wealth that they hold in awe. If the richest and most powerful people in the US were Iranian-Americans and not Jews, these cucky-wuck libertarians would prostrate themselves at the feet of globalist Iranian power.

Anyway, what Christian Zionists and Political Libertarians have in common is the faith that if white folks are ever-so-nice to Jews, Jews will mellow out and pay back the love and affection. This is where both groups are wrong because they fail to understand the Jewish Bio-Cultural Character. The truth is it's highly unlikely that Jews will act in good faith because of the PMB or Pedestal-Mirror-Buttplug Factor. What is meant by the Pedestal. It refers to higher Ashkenazi Jewish intelligence. Even though many Jews deny it, they privately believe their own kind to be smarter than the dimwitted, hapless, and/or one-dimensional goyim. So, Jews place themselves upon the pedestal as the superior race, indeed the master race. Sure, Jews always use such terms in relation to Nazis & 'white supremacists' and pretend as though they themselves are for equality and justice. For example, Jews often excoriate white people for not being 'welcoming' or 'inclusive' enough to the non-white hoi polloi around the world. Thus, one might get the impression that white people want to preserve their 'white privilege', whereas Jews want to share their goodies with all the world. But this is bogus for two reasons. For starters, while one can make a powerful case that white people should not invade and rule over non-white folks — that would indeed be a case of White Privilege — , it's absurd to argue that white people must share their own homelands with all the world. No civilization can maintain itself with open borders, aka Open Invasion. Indeed, Jews themselves have ensured that only Jews get to immigrate to Israel. Jewish tightly guard their own Jewish state while offering up white-majority nations to the world; Jews are being 'generous' with what doesn't even belong to them; imagine someone feigning 'generosity' with YOUR money. Anyway, Jews know full well that if any bunch of people can move to Israel, it will lose its majority-Jewish demography sooner than later. True White Privilege would be a matter of whites having their way in non-white lands. In contrast, whites defending their own homelands and nations is NOT any kind of 'privilege'. It is a duty, and it should be called White Duty, or White Priority. After all, it must be the duty and priority of every people to guard and defend their own homeland, especially if it's deeply ancestral. So, when Jews smear White Duty and White Priority(of defending and preserving white nations) as 'white privilege'(or even 'white supremacy'), it is a dirty trick.

Jerry Nadler the vile and vicious Jew 

Jewish BS is bogus for another reason. Increased Diversity doesn't lead to greater equality but greater inequality, what with Jews getting richer over the rest. First, how can all the diverse immigrant-invaders compete with Jews who are not only more intelligent but so well-connected? Also, the Jewish lie of promised equality should be obvious to anyone, especially given how Jewish Power has rigged the American System to favor Jews uber alles. If Jews and their allies were really into equal justice, would they be insisting that the US must regard Israel as its closest ally while turning a blind eye to the plight of Palestinians? Furthermore, Diversity makes Jews(and their globalist allies) even richer because it undermines the national middle class & working class. So, while wages drop for the white middle/working classes, the profits rise for the upper-crust made of Jews and other globalists. And of course, Jewish Power grows ever more powerful under the Diversity regimen because the diverse groups of goyim simply can't get their act together to form an effective coalition against Jewish Power. Not only do the Jewish Media and Jewish-paid whore-politicians pit the various goy groups against one another(whereas 'leftist' and 'rightist' Jews work as a team) but the elites of goy groups are vetted and paid for by the Jewish oligarchs who own them like so many nickels and dimes in their pockets. So, whether the politicians or 'leaders' are whites like Paul Ryan or Lindsey Graham OR blacks like Al Sharpton or Barack Obama, all they ever really do is suck up to Jews. It's rather remarkable in the case of Sharpton because he once used to be a tireless Jew-baiter. But Jewish Money goes a long way, and the rambunctious jive-ass bunny has been sucking up to Jews over the years.

Anyway, not only are Ashkenazi Jews possessed of higher intelligence but they know it. Therefore, they regard non-Jews as inferiors or untermensch who must serve the smarter Jews. Jewish attitude is much like the pig attitude in George Orwell's ANIMAL FARM, which today is most relevant as a HBD(Human Bio-Diversity) allegory. It's made more problematic due to the Jewish Covenant-mentality. If Jews were mainly libertarian, their sense of superiority would mostly be individualistic, i.e. they'd believe only the smart Jewish individuals deserve all the money and privilege they got. But because of the tribal Covenant-mentality, Jews think that they, as a group, should rule over other peoples. While white libertarian elites will side with smart and/or rich non-whites against non-smart and/or non-rich whites, Jewish 'covenantarian' elites will primarily side with even lesser Jews even against white elites who are the socio-economic peers.
It's been said Episcopalians are just as smart as Jews, even a bit smarter. Then, why did Jews come out on top over Wasp Episcopalians? It's because Jews not only used their superior IQ in individual terms but drew strength from their sense of tribal unity and destiny, whereas Episcopalians came around to thinking only in terms of atomized individualism or collective universalism. People who act merely as individuals may gain great wealth, but they cannot amass power as a group. As for those who seek to include all of humanity in their tent, they end up with a morass of deracination, confusion, and chaos. 'Rightist' Wasps only thought in terms of 'me, me, me', and 'leftist' Wasps thought only in terms of 'world, world, world', encompassing all of humanity. Both sides lost out to Jews who, even as they've exploited the advantages of individualism and universalism, opted for 'we, us, ours' as their central mindset. So, if one bunch of Wasps veered off into one direction while another bunch of Wasps veered off into the other direction, Jews remained on track to push their ethnocentric agenda. Jews used individualism to the extent that highly talented Jewish individuals came to amass great fortunes. Jews also used universalism to the extent of persuading white/goy nations to open up to the entire world in the name of shared humanity, and such open vulnerability allowed Jewish power and wealth to penetrate so many nations and sink its hooks into them. Jews regard individualism and universalism as mere tools, whereas so many goyim have been 'intellectually' hoodwinked into accepting them as the core tenet of existence and justice. What really animates Jews is their form of ethno-spiritual tribalism that might be called 'covenantarianism'. Ideology is like air, identity is like matter. While all people need some degree of ideology(or beliefs based on creed), it is too thin as a civilizational core to sustain them through history. It is identity(or one's sense of belonging based on breed) that wins in the long run. A people must be careful not to embrace too strongly an ideology that undermines their sense of identity. Also, while small identities may unite with other identities of similar race-and-culture to form a bigger and stronger identity, it is game over if a people allow their identities to be diluted, erased, and even replaced by others. When similar identities unite, it is like flames coming together to build a bigger flame. When certain identities are overwhelmed by very different and even hostile identities, it's like flames being put out by fire.

Anyway, white people must understand that Jews will never regard them as equals because Jews believe themselves to be more intelligent and holier in the eyes of God(or History). In a way, modern Jewish identity might be called Achievement-Identity, or Identity-of-Pride in having produced so many geniuses, neo-prophets, artists, business titans, and etc. The New Republic, over several decades, was like the journal of Jewish Achievement Identitarianism. White people mustn't expect to be treated as equals by such a people. Jews feel entitled under the eyes of God and/or History to rule over goyim, and white people are their prize horse. Jews value whites as property, not as humanity. Whites are good in the eyes of Jews AS LONG AS they serve Jews. Now, some white people may figure that Jews will treat them nice IF whites do indeed honor and serve Jews as the superior race. Just like a master treats a dog kindly, maybe the Jewish Master will treat the White Dog nicely if the latter dutifully does the bidding of the Jews, fetch, roll over, and wag its tail. Such an attitude is self-debasing but also delusional. White cuckery doesn't fill the Jewish heart with gratitude but contempt. Upon seeing the once great race debasing itself at their feet, Jews feel even more contempt and just want to spit on white servility even as they demand it. Jews may gauge and value white cuckery for what it's worth in political and economic terms, but they feel ZERO RESPECT for it.

Another reason why Jews can't be expected to have kindly attitude toward white goyim is the Mirror Factor. If the Pedestal Factor instills Jews with Superiority Complex, the Mirror Factor imbues them with Inferiority Complex. Everyday, when Jews like Anthony Weiner wake up in the morning and look in the mirror, they see a funny-looking Jew staring back. Now, there are many good-looking Jews, and I don't necessarily mean Jews with substantial European blood. There are Semitic-looking Jews who are handsome in their own way, just as it's true of Arabs. But as Jewish evolution favored brains, money, zealotry(which went from spiritual to ideological in the 19th century), and pushiness above all other considerations, it didn't favor the traits of beauty. Among European noblemen, there was the dream of the handsome prince marrying the beautiful princess and having many good-looking kids together. Among Jews, the main consideration in marriage was money and/or mind. As such, many Jews ended up looking nerdoidean or haggly-waggly. Now, some Jews have a sense of humor and don't mind other races being better-looking. But many Jews, especially because of the Pedestal Factor, have been deeply resentful over the fact that some races, especially the 'Aryans', are generally more attractive than Jews. I mean, how did that happen? If Jews got the Covenant with God, shouldn't they be the fairest race?

In the past, white 'Anti-Semites' made a big deal of Jewish looks, especially with caricatures with hooked noses and sloping foreheads. But then, out of sensitivity over Shoah, fear of Jewish power, and/or influence of Jewish media, most whites decided they must be effusively nice to Jews. Over time, the only people commenting negatively about Jewish looks became Jewish comedians. Consider how Woody Allen beds only 'Aryan' women in STARDUST MEMORIES and then mocks ugly Jewish women. White people decided to remain mum about Jewish looks and, if anything, cheered white/Jewish sexual pairings.

Now, did such massive shift in goy attitude lead to Jews finally developing nice and kindly thoughts about whites? No. The fact is no matter how much whites praise, honor, and even adore Jews, Jews wake up every morning, look in the mirror, and feel like the wicked queen in SNOW WHITE. "Mirror, mirror on the wall, why does staring at myself make me run to the Wailing Wall?" Remember Cinderella was nice to her ugly 'sisters', but it was to no avail. The fact is the ugly sisters continued to hate her because she was beautiful while they were not. Indeed, their hostility toward Cinderella was compounded by the fact that she was their social inferior. Why should the inferior have the superior looks? Likewise, Jews, especially the women, wonder why the lowly goyesses should have the better looks? It fills them with envy, resentment, and even hatred. If Jewish men are eager to get their hands on blonde 'shikses', Jewish women want to carry out 'beauticide' by encouraging white women to mate with black men. Then, the kids that incubate in white wombs will have nappy hair, broad noses, and fat lips. Thus, 'Aryan' beauty will be destroyed, and then, even Jewish women will look better than the mulatto-ized white race. Now, of course, most white people aren't all that good-looking, but when it comes to beauty, people tend to think of the cream of the crop of any race, and justifiably or not, white beauty has become the World Standard. For that reason, the Mirror Factor will make Jews feel hatred toward the white race in the foreseeable future.

Finally, there is the Buttplug Factor. Ever notice that Jews have some of the worst personalities in the world? They really take the cake when it comes to being a**holes. One might say they act like they got buttplugs up their bungs. Jews are irritating and irritable. Now, Jewish comedians made this aspect of their ethno-cultural personality somewhat endearing through the use of humor. Who hasn't laughed at Don Rickles and Rodney Dangerfield? Or at Woody Allen and Mel Brooks? And yet, just like the use of 'camp' has really been a crutch for nasty, vicious, and narcissistic homos, Jewish humor is often the velvet glove that conceals a tight wound-up fist. Indeed, humor is partly therapeutic to Jews because if they didn't learn to laugh, they would hyperventilate and blow up with neurosis, hostility, and biliousness. It's like the Marx Brothers. They drive everyone and themselves crazy. If not for the humor as safety-valve, they'd probably go totally nuts and turn half of humanity into raving petite-hitlers or 'petitlers'.

Now, one may wonder how Jews developed the Buttplug Personality, and it probably has to do with their history of Rabbinical studies and middleman/merchant practices. To be a successful religious scholar, Jews had to verbally out-argue others, often over hair-splitting matters. And to be successful as businessmen, Jews had to be haggly and contentious. And so, Jews developed the kind of personality that many goyim might find to be unappealing, hostile, ugly, and even offensive. Just like some organisms evolved to be especially aggressive and problematic, the Jewish personality developed to cause a lot of problems. And yet, in its tireless energy, it has also been the source of many great achievements by Jews. Generally, greatness is the product of extreme, not mild, personalities. Richard Wagner and Ludwig van Beethoven were 'Aryans', not Jews, but both had very difficult and demanding personalities.

Anyway, the problem with Jews is with the sum of the three factors: Pedestal, Mirror, and Buttplug. After all, a people can be pretty intelligent and not be so unpleasant. A people can be plain-looking and even ugly and not so destructive. Australian Aborigines are considered to be on the 'ugly' side, but they are causing problems around the world. And people can have temperamental or nasty personalities and be limited in the harm they do. Greeks and Southern Italians have been known to be hot-headed and confrontational, but they don't endanger the world. But because of Jewish intelligence amasses great power and gives vent to Jewish resentments, the combination of ability and hostility can do great harm to the world.
Indeed, why was Nazi Germany so dangerous? There was the combination of awesome German talent and the pathology of the ruling elites headed by unstable Adolf Hitler. Because Jews gain so much with their intelligence and ability(and feel great arrogance toward goyim due to their tribal Covenant with God and History), there is a lot of firepower behind resentments of Jewish Inferiority Complex and the temper tantrums of Jewish Irascibility. Indeed, one reason why Jews hate Donald Trump so much is he has his own kind of 'chutzpah', which makes him go off script and howl like a wolf than bark like a dog at the behest of the master. Jewish intelligence enables Jewish hostility, and Jewish hostility fuels Jewish intelligence. It is a venomous combination, and one needs to be cold-eyed and clear-headed about the Jewish character as we move into the future where Jewish Power and Wealth will keep expanding. When faced with such cohabitant, competitor, or enemy, one must NOT give into naivete, sentimentality, or wishful thinking. One must know the truth. You must know your Jew.