Paradoxically, the Best Way to Defend Free Speech is to Deny It to Your Enemy — Then, Your Enemy will Work Hard to Defend Free Speech — Call for Hate Speech Legislation against Zionist 'Hate Speech' against Palestinians and Anti-White Defamation emanating mainly from Jewish Supremacism

Jews who monopolize social and video platforms like Facebook and Youtube are at it again. They are purging entire accounts and deleting 100,000s of videos. Some say internet companies are implementing this policy under duress from organizations like ADL but that’s neither there nor here as both ADL and the monopolists of those internet companies are Jewish and arch-Zionist. The wretched hag Susan Wojcicki, who was given control over Youtube, may pretend to care about free speech, but it’s all phony hand-wringing. Her ilk would like for us to believe they are defenders of free speech but are forced to act under pressure from ADL and the like. But this is nonsense. Google that owns Youtube is one of the richest companies in the world. It doesn’t have to listen to ADL. It can do as it wants, which is, of course, what it does. And what it chooses to do is work closely with ADL to push Terms of Services that are conducive to the Only Rule that matters to Tribe: "Is it good for Jews?" or more precisely, "Is it great for Jewish Supremacism?" And it’s not a left vs right issue because Jews on both sides of the political aisle work tirelessly to shut down BDS by means of both business and the state. Incidentally, BDS is mostly aligned with the American Left, but it’s given no latitude by the Zionist monopolists of Google and Facebook who are less ideological and more tribal-supremacist.

Google and Facebook(and other companies) yammer about Terms of Services, but it is THEY who have violated the Terms and Promises. When they were getting started, they wanted to draw everyone in because they wanted to be monopolies. If they had honestly stated from the get-go that they’d favor the Democrats, Globalists, Zionist-Supremacists, Homomania, and etc. at the expense of others, many many people would not have used those services and instead would have sought out alternative services. The ONLY reason why ALL OF US decided to use those services was because Google, Facebook, and the like more-or-less promised us neutrality, fairness, and balance. Google even boasted early on that it would not do ‘evil’. Because people of all stripes trusted Google and Facebook, they signed up for those services on a massive scale, thereby turning them into mega-monopolies that pushed out all competition. But now that they have amassed monopoly powers, what are they doing? They are using their muscle to favor and promote certain voices and viewpoints while suppressing, censoring, and banning others. This is called the Jewish Hustle. It’s like what a pool shark does. He plays the first few games not so well and even loses a few to lure suckers into more games with higher stakes. Google and Facebook Jews conned us. They became monopolies but sucking ALL OF US in on the basis of fairness and neutrality, but once they gained great fortune and power, they decided to use their monopoly muscle to favor certain voices over others.

Furthermore, they’ve betrayed the entire spirit of Youtube and Facebook. Youtube became a thing because, for the first time, ordinary people could become part of the media than mere passive observers. Prior to the internet and effective video-platforms, most people watched TV news and shows made by a handful of corporations, but there was no effective way for them to offer feedback or create their own content. But with advancing video-streaming technology, millions of people were able to become content-creators and share their views. And in some ways, they were advantaged over media ‘mavens’ because they didn’t have a boss telling them what they could or couldn’t say. This freedom made some of the commentary downright loony, but it also meant more freedom for people to speak freely, something that is impossible in ‘mainstream media’ where any reporter or personality who spouts wrongthink can summarily be fired. So, on a host of issues and subjects, the personalities on Youtube and Facebook began to share their views with genuine sincerity. This element of sincerity and courageousness made certain Youtube, Facebook, and Twitter personalities very popular(or notorious), regularly drawing a larger share of the audience than ‘mainstream’ media where most news people and opinion-makers couldn’t step beyond the boundaries set by corporations and official narrative.
That was the whole point of Youtube's appeal. If we should just watch and listen to Corporate News and Shows made by a handful of mega-corporations, why bother with a platform like Youtube or Facebook where the DIFFERENCE is you can gain access to things OUTSIDE the perimeters of corporate and state control? Youtube began as a place where you could upload videos and share your views and share in the views of others just like you who had something to say and could do by making videos. But, what has Youtube been doing lately? It’s rigged search results so that, on any hot, controversial, or contentious topic, just about the only search results it will show are those by corporate news and bogus ‘independent’ content-creators(like the Young Turks) who’ve been tamed by massive funding by the super-rich Jews. Again, what is the point of using Youtube if it’s going to operate just like the Old TV. YOUtube has turned into WEtube, the ‘we’ in this case being oligarchic Zionists and mega-corporations that hog ownership and control of most of the media. They now say, ‘WE’ got the power, and ‘WE’ Zionist oligarchs will work with other Zionist monopolists of the media to control the Platform, Megaphone, and the Narrative. When push comes to shove, Jews prove to be tribalists first and ideologues second. All this stuff about ‘free speech’ and ‘First Amendment’ means nothing to Jews if free exchange of facts, analysis, and opinions threatens the Jewish lock on power.

Of course, the problem isn’t merely Jewish but Cuck-Wasp. Anglo-Americans who once used to rule America handed over power to the Jews so thoroughly and completely that Jewish Power has no effective opposition. When the Founding Fathers formed the new republic, they were careful to implement a system of checks and balances where no person, sector, or branch of government could have total power. But when Wasps handed over power to the Bugs(Busy Urban Globalist Semites, aka Jewish elites), they implemented no standards and methods by which the New Power could be counter-balanced and critiqued. But then, this massive quasi-revolutionary transference of power took place almost stealthily without declaration. It could be a Silent Revolution, Silent Coup, Silent Surrender, and Silent Betrayal because it didn’t happen overnight but over a decade or two. It was dramatic, indeed seismic, but gradual enough for people not to notice, especially when the Jew-run media created the impression that Whites were still in control, not least by using Wasp figureheads & mouthpieces and by getting young people all worked up about ‘white privilege’.
It’s incredible that the Founders were more concerned about the future of the American republic than the late-stage Wasps who handed power to Jews without putting any safety locks in place. To be sure, it would have been risky for late-stage Wasps to sound the alarm as Jews had such control of media and academia when the transference of power happened. Back in the early days of America’s founding, all the organs were controlled by Anglo-Americans who could freely debate the nature of power. But when Jews were taking over, they had near-total monopoly of the media, academia, and the deep state, and it would have been risky for anyone to raise questions about the character of ascendant Jewish Power. Even in the early 70s when Wasps still held the power, Richard Nixon and Billy Graham had to speak secretively about the Jews.

Even though Jews could loudly voice their issues with Wasps, it became deeply contentious and then downright taboo to discuss the problem of Jewish power, personality, and pathologies. Jews could psychoanalyze men like Nixon and raise alarms about the ‘authoritarian personality’(of white goyim, of course), but no one better say anything about Jewish neuroses and pathologies. One thing for sure, late-stage Wasps were most derelict in their duties. Perhaps, it was inevitable that the power would pass over to smarter and more driven Jews, but Wasps, in losing power, could still have created a Culture of Critique(of their own) to scrutinize and expose the dark side of Jewish Power. After all, if Anglo/Germanic Americans(especially those on the Right) were infected with the ‘authoritarian personality’, then one could say Jews carried within them the germ of the radical will(though a compliment in Susan Sontag’s vocabulary) that has caused so many problems around the world(while also leading interesting ideas and propositions).

Anyway, in order to face the rise of censorship in the West, we need to expose and discuss its core source. We need to remind ourselves that it’s not mainly ideological but identito-centric. Essentially, it’s about Jews shutting down any voice they find threatening to Jewish supremacist power. Those who say the ‘left’ or ‘woke capital’ is behind the Culture of Censorship are focusing on the dogs, not on the dog-owner; on the puppets, not on the puppet-master; on the ‘buffers’, not on the guy who is ‘pushing the button’. Besides, the Real Left is deader than the Right. As I’ve said many times before, today’s so-called ‘left’ is just an ‘idological’(idolatry as ideology) front of Jewish Supremacism and Global Capitalism. Big Money and Big Institutions pushed bratty and insipid inanity, triviality, and decadence as the hallmarks of ‘new leftism’ so that Jewish Superpower and Global Capital would NOT come under any real pressure from the populace.
As history has shown, the most effective counterbalance against Big Capital is nationalism and working-class consciousness. Nationalism pressures Big Money to be patriotic and prioritize what is good for the nation-as-a-whole than "what’s in it for ME?" Nationalism binds the elites to a place and people. And worker-consciousness can organize for higher wages and more concessions from the Big Capital class. This is why Big Capital has come to dislike nationalism and worker-consciousness. By undermining nationalism, Big Capital can make more profits by outsourcing jobs and ‘insourcing’ cheaper foreign labor. Furthermore, to erode nationalism even further, the elites say the foreigners must be accepted as ‘New Nationals’ or else it’s ‘racist’ or ‘xenophobic’. Thus, the rich elites, who’d been morally defensive against the demands of nationalists and workers positioned themselves on the moral offensive as the ‘inclusive’ and ‘welcoming’ Good People at odds with ‘closed-minded’ nationalists and ‘petty-minded’ working class folks.
Of course, the rich elites don’t have to bear the brunt of mass Diversity as they, with increasing profits via globalism, can afford to live in the nicest and safest areas. And even if they rub shoulders with Diversity, it is with the quality kind — the most educated and high-earning POC(people of color) — than with the worst dregs of society. Just like rich whites get the Obamas whereas poor whites have to deal with the Mike-Tysons of the world, rich whites(and Jews) rub shoulders with affluent Asians and Hindus(and white Latinos), whereas the poorer whites must deal with the worst elements among the new arrivals. The elites claim to reject nationalism as too small-minded and petty because their hearts and minds are BIG ENOUGH for all the world and all of humanity. But this is utter nonsense because, even as they destroy national walls, they are busy building economic walls of privilege for themselves that are among the most exclusive habitats on Earth. Also, while elitism on a national level is realistic, elitism on a global scale is merely rhetorical. Elites can lead nations, not the world. Thus, those who claim to care about the whole world end up doing nothing for anyone... but themselves. It's like parents who neglect their own kids in the name of helping ALL THE CHILDREN of the world end up doing nothing for anyone; by focusing on all the children, they neglect their own kids, but then, they do nothing for all the children since it's impossible; it just becomes empty pretty talk. This Elysium World of Globosphere was sharply presented in Woody Allen’s BLUE JASMINE.

All these people put on airs of being open-minded even as they live in the most enclosed places on Earth. Their residences are not necessarily gated or walled of physically, but the costs are forbidding enough to keep most people out. Now, if these people were only about piggery and privilege, it wouldn’t be so bad. What makes them insufferable and ultimately intolerable is they have a bogus and conceited air about them. Ooh lala, they are not only rich and privileged but are MORALLY better than the hoi polloi because they are soooooo open-minded and tolerant(especially of fancy-pants homos). It’s really like Marie Antoinette play-pretending to be a shepherdess. It’s like the jerks at Google and Facebook. They rake in all the money from globalism, live in their ultra-posh neighborhoods that exclude most people, and send their kids to the most expensive schools, but they act like they’re so ‘progressive’ because they are so ‘tolerant’ and into ‘diversity’.

And of course, they are into the Holy Three of Jew Worship, Negro Worship(from a safe distance), and Homo Worship. If these people were truly ideological in the leftist sense, they would favor no particular group over others UNLESS the favored group happens to be the masses of workers, the ordinary folks. Leftism was about the People against the Rulers, not about One Particular Group over Other Groups. Now, some may argue that Jews, blacks, and homos had been victimized in history, and therefore, they are deserving of leftist sympathy as ‘oppressed groups’. But if we look back in history, EVERY PEOPLE had been oppressed at one time or other. Also, blacks were big players in the slave trade and did all the capturing and selling to whites(and Arabs). As for Jews, they were as often victimizers as victims. In the 20th century, they were among the greatest victims under Nazism, but they were also among the biggest villains as communists, Zionist-imperialists, finance capitalists, and cultural subversives. As for homosexuality, even though it was repressed for most of human history(and for good reason), homos never constituted a valid social group because a homo could be BORN INTO any family, any nationality, or any class. A homo could be born into a slave-owning family or into a slave family. Also, given their vanity and natural narcissism, homos have often sidled up to the Power in its exploitation of the masses. In this, both Jews and homos have something in common as historic ‘minority collaborators’ with the Ruling Elites that squeezed their own peoples. And today, globalist homos work with Jewish globalist supremacists for World Hegemony, what with Jews as the King and Homos as the Queen.

So, all would-be truth-tellers need to stop calling the Globalists the ‘left’. As I’ve said many times before, it’s giving them too much credit. It only creates the impression that the current Globalist Elites who rule the West and much of the world are on the side of ‘progress’ when their ideology is really but the Regression to the Greed. How can globo-homo issues be ‘leftist’ when homos and trannies make up just a tiny fraction of society, especially a haughty, fussy, arrogant, and ooh-lala one at that. These homos cater to the rich and powerful. To understand homo psychology, watch THE TALENTED MR. RIPLEY(with Elizabeth-Warren-lookalike Matt Damon as the homokin) or the psycho-homo played to perfection by Will Patton in NO WAY OUT.

Now, some might argue that being pro-mass-immigration is leftist because it pits the poor(or poorer) masses of the Third World against the richer and ‘more privileged’ whites of the First World. But, in fact, the Diversity of the newcomers make it impossible for them to unite as a bloc against the ruling power that remains Jewish, Homo, and white-cuck-collaborationists. Also, as the newcomers mainly compete with the white hoi polloi, the elites can exploit the tensions of the lower orders while grabbing most of the loot for themselves. The elites know that white-and-nationalist people, out of racial solidarity, will not side with People of Color against Jewish/white elites; they also know that the POC will not rise against the Jewish/white elites who are for mass-immigration. If anything, POC generally side with Jewish/white elites against the white hoi polloi. Also, even if POC,-as-new-nationals, vote for so-called ‘progressive’ politicians, the fact is they don’t get to decide policy. They only supply votes for politicians handpicked by Jewish supremacist elites who make sure their paid-for-whores shill for Jewish interests and Israel uber alles. If ideology really matters in the US, why is there no difference between the GOP and the Democrats in the mindless support for Israel and endless hosannas to Jews? While more of the grassroots Democrats may be sympathetic to Palestinians and BDS Movement, those concerns are NEVER addressed at the upper echelons of the Party where all the key decisions are made. So, the rank-and-file just supply the votes for the puppet-politicians vetted by Jewish Power to be servile to Zion and Jewish globo-homo supremacism. BDS is usually associated with the Left, but it gets ZERO protection from high-powered Democrats. Even Tulsi Gabbard supported the Anti-BDS bill.

The ‘Idology’ of Jews matter more than any ideology in American ‘progressivism’ or ‘leftism’, which is now totally bogus. Now, it may well be that many so-called ‘progressives’ are passionate and sincere in their hysterics, but they are utterly lacking in agency. They have no clue as to who really rules the world, and their minds are so easily molded by the Jewish Hand that has monopoly control of media, academia, deep state, and finance. If ‘progressives’ are so independent-minded, how did they so suddenly lose interest in the working class and become so obsessed over globo-homo issues? It’s because their silly little heads are hardly different from TV sets. Their antennas pick up signal from the Central Command System. So, if TV shows say ‘homo is holy’, the progs are thus programmed. So-called ‘progressives’ really ought to be called ‘programmives’. They are like chorus characters in a Jewish-Homo musical play. If progs lack true agency, Negroes are mostly about URGENCY; they are masterful slaves of their basest instincts for hollering and ‘twerking’. Dominance of urgency essentially robs blacks of real agency because their instincts, sensations, and emotions override any rational and/or reflective understanding of the world. Black soul is a pool of narcissism that blacks endlessly stare into to feed their junglomania. Even a fat, ugly, and stupid black woman has the diva-complex of thinking she be ‘queen of the Nile and shit’.

Now, what would be the most effective way to combat the rise of censorship? First, we must focus on the main source behind it. All honest observers will notice it is Jewish Power. Then, we must fight fire with fire against Jewish Power. We must direct all or at least most of our fire on the Jews. Next, we must ask, "What means are Jews using to shut down free speech?" It is the moral passion of combating ‘hate speech’, speech that is SO BEYOND THE PALE that it mustn’t air freely lest it poison the social ecology. As emotions override reason among many people, especially in relation to sacrosanct matters, there has been a growing number of people who are willing to sacrifice free speech 'absolutism’ in favor of Approved Free Speech(which is really free-speech-in-name-only). Especially among Millennials, a generation raised under PC in schools and pop culture from cradle to school to work, there is a willingness to shut down ‘hate speech’ that supposedly defiles the Holy Three of Jew-Worship, Negro-Worship, and Homo-Worship. Indeed, there are SPECIAL TERMS to defame any view that dares to speak truth to Jews, blacks, and homos: ‘Antisemitism’, ‘racism’, and ‘homophobia’. Granted, ‘racism’ can mean any kind of racial or ethnic bigotry, but it has bite ONLY in relation to blacks because Pop Culture and PC Narrative have instilled so many folks with images of the Magic Negro. Because blacks have been presented as especially tragic and ‘spiritual’, people are more triggered by heresy against Black Worship than by negative things said about most other racial or ethnic groups. Consider how Hollywood got away with all those movies that stereotyped Arabs/Muslims as subhuman terrorists. Or, consider how it’s perfectly okay for Hollywood to stereotype Russians as vile thugs or fan the flames of yellow peril where the Chinese are presented as especially villainous. Thus, so many Millennials grew up with images of holiness that favor blacks over others. Because Millennials and self-righteous PC types(whose minds have been so thoroughly warped by TV and/or academic indoctrination) are so weepy-eyed and holy-schmoly about Jews, blacks, and homos, they would rather sacrifice free speech in the name of banning ‘hate speech’, which is to them what devil-talk was to Christians in the Middle Ages. Even the rational side of man often caves to the power of taboos that is out to snuff the blasphemous. This aspect of progs is often overlooked because of the conceit that ‘liberalism’ is secular and rationalist, therefore opposed to religious dogma. But ideology, especially when laced with ‘idology’, is just a secular variant of theocracy. Whether it was the mass reverence for Marx, Lenin, Stalin, or Mao OR it is the virtual worship of Jews(as Shoah People), blacks(as Magic Negroes), or homos(as fairy-angels of the new era), the same psychological dynamics come into play. The emotional commitment is so powerful that the faculty of reason and true secular/liberal principles break down. Also, such emotions tend to simplify and ‘dichotomize’ any issue that pertains to their notion of the holy. Just like for the true believers of religion, there is God and the Devil, there is for the PC-indoctrinated minions a worldview where the Good is pitted against the Evil. Because of such Manicheanism, even moderate and slightly deviant views could be denounced as wicked. Just like the Pod People in THE INVASION OF THE BODY SNATCHERS cannot tolerate any human — each and every person must be made into a Pod Person! — , PC minions believe they are on the ‘right side of history’ and that anyone who disagrees must either be converted soon enough or condemned as hopelessly ‘hateful’. This is why even moderate ‘rightist’ thinkers like Charles Murray and Heather MacDonald have been hounded by PC loons. In their pathetic but passionate little minds, there is Good and Evil, and they are on the side of the Good. The Evil is lack of reverence for Jews, blacks, and homos. Because the Holy Three is SO IMPORTANT to them, even mildly critical or neutral feelings toward the trinity are deeply suspect and to be condemned. It’s like, for true believers in Religion, there can be no middle ground between Faith and Devil-Worship. To the true believer, the moderate non-believer is hardly different from an outright Devil Worshiper. Because he believes God is so true and holy, those who stand outside the light, even if not vociferously anti-God, must be agents of the Devil. Likewise, PC minions’ faith in Jew Worship, Negro Worship, and Homo Worship is so total as the fashion-passion of the moment that they simply cannot conceive of any goodness or decency outside their vision of the Light. To be on the side of angels, one must condemn any critic of Jews as ‘nazi’, any skeptic of LGBTQ nonsense as ‘homophobic’, and any speaker of truth about blacks as ‘racist’. PC isn’t merely about hostility against what it deems as evil but about rage & exasperation over any lack of requisite enthusiasm for the Holy Three. Middle-ground is not acceptable for PC. You must believe! One mustn’t let facts, reason, and skepticism color one’s views about Jews, MLK & Mandela, BLM(even though blacks usually kill blacks), and globo-homo fruitkins(who are now so holy that ‘gay colors’ now routinely adorn Mainline churches.) Just like narcissists are blind to the world in their obsessive self-worship, moral narcissists of PC are blind to all of reality that don’t conform to their self-esteem as holy-schmoly(if Jews, blacks, or homos) or properly-redemptive-and-atoning(if white and cucky-wuck). Take Ken Burns, aka CucKen Burns, an insufferable dweeb who is so into Negro Worship that he is totally blind to all the trouble blacks make for whites. But then, rich and privileged whites like him can choose to rub shoulders with the Nicer Negroes.
Also, blacks tend to treat rich whites differently from poor ones. The poor ones, they beat up and terrorize, but the rich ones, they flatter and schmooze. This is why rich whites, Democratic or Republican, have a totally different experience of blacks. Not only do they rub shoulders with better kind of blacks but blacks, even lowly ones, tend to behave better around rich ones. After all, if a black guy is a limo driver or receptionist, he is bound to treat rich ‘honkeys’ with respect he would never show to a lowly ‘honkey’. So, the rich ‘honkey’, being accustomed to being treated with respect by blacks, has a far more positive view of blacks than lowly whites do who are disrespected and humiliated. Also, the rich ‘honkey’ feels a certain anxiety complex because he is superior to the Negro in social status but below him in ‘moral status’(according to PC that posits Jews, Negroes, and Homos as the holy three); the reason why so many rich whites, including ‘conzos’, took so quickly to Homos is because homos are ‘holy’ and high-status. When a socially superior rich ‘honkey’ is served by a ‘morally superior’ ‘groid’, the former feels his ‘white guilt’ compounded because, even after all these years, he the whitey is being served by the blacky. So, he feels an added urge to be nice to the Negro and entertain friendly thoughts about blacks in general. In contrast, when a rich white guy is with a rich homo, their social parity makes things a bit smoother.

Anyway, once we have identified the main source that threatens the principle of Free Speech, we need to go on the offensive as well as play defense. No one ever won a war purely by playing defense alone. Even the toughest boxer will eventually be KO’ed by an inferior boxer if he only plays defense. This is why Jews keep winning. They play defense and offense. They defend Israel as their national homeland while attacking the nationalism of goyim. They defend their own identity, legacy, and heritage while impugning the identities, legacies, and heritages of other groups. Jews defend their own right to free speech while denouncing the uses of free speech by their enemies or rivals, real or perceived. When Jewish radicals were hounded by anti-communists in the early 50s, Jews lavishly funded ACLU to defend even anti-American and pro-communist speech(or silence as in taking the fifth) as a means to defend Jewish speech(as so many of the leftist radicals were Jews). Even as Jews were going out on a limb to defend their own liberty and speech rights in the US, many of them were supporting Stalinism in Eastern Europe even though people over there were being denied basic democratic rights and even being imprisoned or executed. Why? Because many of those Stalinist agents were Jewish, and Western Jewry regarded them as fellow tribal brethren. This is how Jews play the game. Nationalism for me but not for thee. Free Speech for me but not for thee. Jews also support gun rights in Israel because a well-armed populace means Jews with Guns. But in the US, Jews oppose gun rights because most guns are in the hands of goyim, especially white conservatives and patriots who tend to be more opposed to Jewish agendas of deracination and degeneracy. So, there you go: Guns for me but not for thee. Jews play defense and offense. They defend what is theirs but go on the offensive against what the Other has.

Now, some may argue that it’s not just the Jews. Non-whites are also opposed to Free Speech and Gun Rights, but then, ask yourself, why this is so. It’s because they’ve come under the influence of Jewish media and academia that tell non-whites that white people’s speech is ‘hate speech’ and that an armed white populace are ‘nazis’. Non-whites, just like so many cucky-wuck whites, are mental clay in Jewish Hands. The source of anti-free-speech-ism is not non-whites but Jews who mold so many minds via their control of institutions and industries. Also, Jews are especially dominant in the Democratic Party, and their main strategy for keeping the diverse and divergent coalition together has been by vilifying whiteness. And that is why so many non-whites have come to regard free speech and gun-rights for whites as problematic. Because Jews told them to see whites as the White Devil, they’ve come to regard white speech as devil-talk and white gun-ownership as the Wehrmacht or the KKK. The real source of white problems is the Jews.

Almost always, your enemy will give you bad advice. He will tell you to do what you shouldn’t do while he himself doesn’t do it, indeed does the very opposite. It’s like the British/Jews told the Chinese to use opium while they banned it in their own domains. You would have to be stupid to give your enemy good advice, which would be like feeding him key information. Now, if Jews regarded whites as allies and friends(as whites have come to see Jews), then Jewish advice might be of value. But the truth is Jews regard whites as the enemy(or main rival), and therefore, it doesn’t matter what whites think of Jews. If Bob sees Bill as a friend but Bill sees Bob as an enemy, Bob’s hospitality and trust will be completely wasted because Bill is committed to bringing Bob down. In the end, what YOU think matters less than what HE thinks of YOU. If HE thinks you suck and should be brought down, no amount of YOUR positive view of him will change the fact that he’s out to get you. Likewise, it doesn’t matter what whites think of Jews. The truth is most Jews see whites as either enemies or rivals... or at best lackeys and servants, certainly not as equals. In the present, whites are so trusting and servile to Jews that they will gladly take on the roles of servants out of their total awe of Jews as brilliant rich folks and Holy Holocaust People. For many whites, Jewishness epitomizes Materiality(money) and Morality. If you’re such a white person, you’re a hopeless and pathetic. Your message to Jews is, "Please don’t hate me, please don’t treat me like an enemy or rival, because all I ever want to do is praise, worship, and serve Jews, Jews, Jews, Israel, Israel, Israel." Such cucks are not even hoping for equality with Jews. They are happy to play the subservient role. It’s like the Charlie Kirks of the world whose big ambition is to be the next John McCain the Cuckaine or Mitt the Shit Romney.

Because the enemy will give you bad advice, indeed quite often the exact opposite of what it does, white people should always have the following rule in mind when dealing with Jews: Do as the Jews do, Disobey what They say. If Jews push ‘white guilt’ on whites, whites must push ‘Jewish Guilt’ on Jews. If Jews push ‘diversity’ on white nations, whites must push ‘diversity’ on Israel. If Jews work with non-whites against whites, whites must work with non-whites, especially Palestinians, against Jews. If Jews shut down white speech as ‘hate speech’, whites must attack Jewish speech as ‘hate speech’. If Jews say ‘antisemitism’ is just horrible, whites must say anti-whitism(the favorite pastime of vile and venal Jews) is totally terrible. Unless whites identify Jews as the main enemy and fight fire with fire, they will lose... as certainly as the Byzantines lost to the Turks. Whites need to go into Reconquista mode that took back Spain from the Moorish invaders. Whites must reconquer what is theirs, and in order to do this, they must seek White National Liberation from Jewish Supremacism.

To fight fire with fire, White Liberation(or White Emancipation or White Independence) from Jewish Supremacism must adopt a Speech Policy that is akin to the Jewish Strategy. Whites must demand a speech code that forbids the defaming or dehumanizing of whites. After all, Turkey has a law that bans insult to Turkey-ness, and Russia has a law that bans denigrating the memory of Russians in World War II. Whites must demand a speech code that forbids any insult to whiteness, any impugning of white memory. Of course, whites will be free to criticize, condemn, and disparage other groups. Whites should call for ‘hate speech laws’ that favor white identity and interests, just like Jews push for ‘hate speech laws’ that favor Jewish identity, Zionism, and their interests. From the Jewish POV, any criticism of Jewish power is ‘hate’. Harsh condemnation of Zionist tyranny over Palestinians is ‘hate’ or ‘antisemitism’, which is why Jews insist that BDS be muted, shut down, and railroaded.
What this shows is that ‘hate speech’ is never a neutral concept. ‘Hate’ is defined by those who control the law. In Turkey, those who insult Turkey-ness are labeled as ‘hateful’, which is why it’s illegal to discuss the Turkish mass-killing of Armenians following World War I. Jews mold the meaning of ‘hate’ to suit their needs. So, all their anti-Wasp and anti-white screeds are not ‘hate’. Jews can defame, dehumanize, and scapegoat whites for all the problems of the world. Indeed, Jews can smear whites much like how Nazis once smeared Jews. All that is not ‘hate’ as far as Jews are concerned. But if any white person shows the slightest hint of white pride or speaks even a bit of truth against Jewish power, that is HATE, say the Jews. This is how Jews play the game. Then, whites must play the same game. Whites must say it must be illegal to insult whiteness. Sure, whites have a checkered history, but then, SO DO ALL OTHER PEOPLES. Why single out the white race as especially guilty or blameworthy for all the problems of the world? This is bigotry and maggotry. Also, what about all the positive contributions that the white race has made for the world? Why not balance the bad with the good? Why dwell so much on white wrongs while never giving credit for white contributions? Such lack of balance goes to show that anti-white dehumanization has become de rigueur in the global debate dominated by Jews. Jews do to whites exactly what they blame the Nazis of having done to them. Jews smear whites as intolerable scum of the Earth UNLESS whites get on their knees and grovel before Jewish Supremacist Power as its cuck-servants. Then and only then are whites tolerated as House Honkeys(if members of the elite) or Field Honkeys(if part of the white hoi polloi). In other words, Jews will not accept whites on an equal basis as a people with sense of identity, illustrious history, and right of destiny. No, Jews regard whites as untermensch, a people who are tolerable only as a slave race. It’s like Nazi German plan for the Russian Slavs was as a race of helots. If allowed to survive, their existence must revolve around serving German ‘Aryan’ interests. Now, there is no need for bad blood between Jews and whites. Both groups could get along, BUT as long as Jews insist on acting the way they do at the moment, whites must push back in kind because otherwise is to risk their survival for all the future. Use the Jewish Way against the Jews. If Jews say, "We believe in free speech but not in ‘hate speech’", say likewise but define ‘hate’ in way that suits white interests. Define ‘hate’ primarily in terms of defaming and dehumanizing whites and furthermore denying the right of pride for all the great achievements made by whites. Also, define ‘hate’ as the neo-imperialist insistence that white people don’t have right of territoriality over their ancient homelands and over nations they built virtually from scratch in North America and Australia. Also, even white self-loathing must be deemed as ‘hate speech’, and the blame must primarily go to the group that did most to instill whites with self-hatred, and of course, the main peddlers of Hate-Whitey Ideology have been the Jews.

Now, some may argue that such ploy would go against the principles of Free Speech, but principles are useless when the Other Side only cares about Power and will do ANYTHING to get what it wants. Principles matter only when (1) all sides commit to the same set of rules and standards or (2) a certain group has the power to enforce the principles on all groups. But the current US is not that kind of country. It’s a nation ruled by Jews whose only ‘principle’ is "Is it good for Jews?" or more accurately, "Is it great for Jewish Supremacism?" Jews violate both rules 1 and 2 of Principle-ism. They don’t care about principles, and they don’t use their dominant power to enforce the same set of principles on all groups, including themselves. Rather, Jews are always busy moving the goal posts to the extent that the US has become a Kafkaesque nation, and ironically enough, the goyim are now like a bunch of Joseph K’s who are toyed around by Jews who control the Castle of Power.

It is only by putting Jews on the moral defensive and threatening their anti-white speech that they will come around to defending free speech(like they once used to when their radical/communist speech was threatened and when they sought to legalize pornography). Why should Jews defend free speech when they have control over the levers of media & academia and when their anti-white speech is not only protected but part of official dogma? Generations of kids, white and non-white, have been raised to the catechism of Blame-Whitey-for-Everything. And white elites, out of craven cowardice and/or outdated sense of magnanimity, put up with all the anti-white garbage. They sense that they must go along with anti-white dogma in order to keep their privileged positions under Jews as the ‘good whites’. Also, old habits die hard. Just like it took time for it to sink in among aristocrats that their days are numbered, white elites(especially the Wasps) had been so used to having the power that many still carry on with the illusion that they are the ruling class of America. Of course, Jews like to sustain such illusions to (1) to hide their power behind the facade of Wasp privilege, thereby making whites the magnet of most criticism(as in "Hollywood-So-White") and (2) to flatter white cuck-collaborators who, having lost their power, have little left but to cling to their title as the Ruling Class. Because white cuck-collaborators still have a lot of money and privilege(if not much influence and real power), they have a bad habit of conflating their own white privilege with the condition of all whites who are NOT privileged; indeed, many whites are now suffering terribly from loss of work, drug addiction, integration with thuggish Negroes, and mass replacement by foreigners.

We need a new movement that is not for the principle of free speech but for shutting down ‘hate speech’ that defames and dehumanizes whites. The position should be, "While it's fair to criticize wrongs and abuses committed by whites, it is NOT ACCEPTABLE to speak of whites as especially burdened with guilt and blame." After all, such is the Jewish line. Jews will say it’s okay for people to criticize Zionism and Jewish abuses, but it’s wrong to say everything Jewish is bad or to blame everything on Jews. (Of course, Jews even denounce mild criticism of Jewish bad behavior as ‘antisemitic’.) What’s good enough for Jews should be good enough for whites. Also, whites must put Jews on the moral defensive by decrying Zionism as ‘hate speech’ that led to the destruction and ‘genocide’ of the Palestinians by means of immigration-invasion. Whites should balance the good/great elements of Jewish history/culture with the dark side, such as Jewish role in communism, radicalism, subversion, criminality, and financial theft. And if Jews bitch about evil white history, whites should point out how Jewish finance played its part in the Western Imperialist ventures. Jewish History is inseparable from 'white supremacism' because Jews were co-partners in the Western Conquest of the World, even going so far as to play a key role in the Latin American slave trade and selling opium to the Chinese under British Imperialist protection. Also, to the extent that Jewish immigrants worked alongside white immigrants to eradicate the American Indians from the Great Plains, Jews also took part in ‘genocide’ of the natives. And to the extent that Jews and their money played some role in the making of the new empires and nations of the New World, Jews are no less ‘guilty’ of the slave trade. Despite Jewish kvetching about ‘white supremacism’, Jews have been tailing ‘white supremacists’ all over the world to make their fortunes. Jews tagged behind Anglos to make tons of money in the diamond mines of South Africa. Wherever Anglo, Spanish, Portuguese, and French imperialists went, Jews followed as financiers, merchants, and investors. Jews exploited every opportunity made possible by ‘white supremacist’ conquerors of the world. And Jews pressured and bribed ‘white supremacist’ Great Britain and Europe in general to aid in the Zionist project that targeted the brown Palestinians for destruction, replacement, and erasure. It isn't very difficult to push Jews into a morally defensive posture. And if Jews bitch about the Shoah(aka Holocaust), remind the world of how Jews played a key role in communism that led to the deaths of millions all over the world. Only when the pushy Jews are pushed back and their rights of speech are threatened, only then will Jews come around to defending free speech. When Jews defended free speech in the past, some thought it was out of principle. But it was just opportunism. When dealing with such people, we need to shelve principles and fight fire with fire.

Commentary on “Ilhan Omar's 'Tropes' are True”(by Kevin Barrett) — Whites need an Emancipation Movement from Jewish Supremacist Power — Whites need Non-Governmental Organizations to Speak Truth to Jewish Power — Whites need to base their Power Strategy on the Jewish Rise to Dominant Position

https://www.unz.com/kbarrett/ilhan-omars-tropes-are-true/

Omar leads the way for White Americans.

White Americans are so fearful about losing majority status, but this is because they only fight with shield than with sword or spear. Lacking an offensive weapon, whites only rely on defensive instrument of demographics: "Hopefully, there will be enough of us to stem the PC tide."
But if whites had an offensive weapon, they could concentrate all their force on the sharpened tip against the heart of the enemy. Where does PC flow from? It mainly flows from the Jewish elite community. Then, it makes sense for whites to drive the sword into the Beast. It's like Siegfried killed the dragon by thrusting his sword into its heart.

In a way, whites must begin to think and 'strategize' like Jews. Just think. How did Jews gain so much power, indeed the dominant power in the US? They certainly didn't have the numbers. Jews were never more than 3% of the US population, and now they are slightly below 2%. Obviously, Jews didn't have the numerical advantage to elect themselves to power like the Irish or Germans did in big cities and entire states in America. Jews gained power by concentrating their offensive energy against the top rulers of the US, the Wasps. Take over the brain, and you gain control of the entire body. Jews pulled this off by two ways: They focused on areas that would gain them the most cash and influence: finance, vice industries, medicine, high tech, big media. And then, with power of media and academia, they sought to de-legitimize Wasp power and privilege by any means necessary. While elevating themselves as a morally holy people, they made Wasps out to be a bunch of phony snobs and 'racist' war-mongering scum. Jews didn't need to worry too much about elections and demographics because they took over the BRAIN CENTERS of the operation. As ideas and narratives flow from the top, Jews in top positions were able to alter the minds of the majority by decree and propaganda. And since Jews were so powerful, it didn't matter which party won as both parties had to kowtow to the real bosses at the top. Jews didn't approach Wasps with a shield. They attacked with a sharpened spear or slingshot that hit the Wasps right in the head(and balls).

In a democracy, there's this conceit that power moves from bottom to top. The people decide what they want and elect politicians to represent their needs and aspirations. But this was more myth than reality. In a democracy, more often than not(and today, almost totally), politicians are puppets vetted by the donor class. They don't so much represent their voters as serve their vetters. Jews understood this. There was no need for Jews, who lacked the numbers by the way, to try to elect politicians who might represent them. Rather, Jews should reach the top by means of economic success and intellectual influence, and then they could vet and own all the puppet politicians, indeed even those from regions that aren't very pro-Jewish because, as the game is played, ALL politicians depend on big-time donors, especially in the modern age of electronic media and interconnected economies that have pretty much undermined local-yokel-ism.

There are two ways to practice power in the US.

1. Elect puppet leaders who will hopefully topple or at least check the bad elites.

2. Select puppet leaders by becoming the new elites.

#2 will beat #1 all the time since 99% of politicians whom people vote for are 'selected' before they are 'elected'. They are vetted before they are voted for. And who does the vetting? The elites.

This is why White America needs to stop with the habit of electing 'conservative' candidates and then hoping they will do their job. The fact is they are puppets. Just look at the likes of Paul Ryan and Marco Rubio. The donor class might as well put up dummy dolls for office.

This is why we need a new kind of politics. This kind of politics doesn't rely on elected officials. Rather, all we need is a growing number of truth-tellers, big and small. Instead of focusing on elections(which are now meaningless because it's only a matter of time before Texas, Florida, and Georgia will turn permanently 'blue'), whites need to use the power of Narrative to name the power. Not with Neo-Nazi or KKK craziness but with simple honesty, courage, and integrity. The fact is the ruling elites of the US are Jewish-globohomo-supremacist. Also, the great majority of Jews are supportive of this power. All Liberal Jews and at least 50% of Neocon Jews. So, 90% of Jews are with globohomo tribal oligarchy. It is this power that has spreads anti-white hatred, anti-Christian degeneracy, moral decadence, jungle fever interracism, cucky-wuckery, opioids to profit off addiction and deaths of whites, broken borders, evil Wars for Israel, and etc. It is this bunch of elites who pushed 'new cold war' with Russia that prevented post-cold-war peace and reconciliation. This power spreads Hate News against Russia, Syria, and Iran. Lately, even against Venezuela. And this power has blanked out most news reports about plight of Palestinians. It violated Constitutional rights in criminalizing BDS. They use Big-Tech-and-Finance collusion to deny freedom of speech and banking services to True Conservatives. They violated freedom of assembly for Unite-the-Right people at Charlottesville. (Whatever one thinks of the people gathered at Charlottesville, they had every right to assemble and speak.)
The recent C-PAC conference showed how utterly fruitless Conservatism Inc. has become. It has Sebastian Gorka saying we need to oppose the 'left' because it's like Stalin taking away your quarter-pounder. (Given the obesity problem, Stalin would be doing Americans a favor.)


Never mind that the so-called 'new left' is totally in bed with Big Capital that has been leading the charge in censoring speech, deplatforming people, firing & blacklisting people based on creed, ruining Christian bakers who refuse to participate in degeneracy, and even denying banking services(which should be criminal as people can't live without banking -- what are they supposed to do, hide all their cash under the bed?). It's especially contemptible because Big Banks used the government to force ALL taxpayers to bail them out, but now, they are selectively denying service to people on the basis of ideology. Meanwhile, Zionist supremacists who spread Wars for Israel, tyrannize Palestinians, and aid ISIS terrorists in Syria can raise all the cash they want and use all the finance and big-tech services as they please. This isn't about Big Tech waging war on 'hate'. It's about imperialist-supremacists clamping down on nationalists who prefer 'republic, not an empire'. Just like Japanese Imperialists shut down Japanese patriots who wanted the Japanese military to withdraw from China and mind its own business, the globo-homo imperialists clamp down on Western nationalists who say NO MORE to empire and call for border security and sovereignty. Imperialism hates limited nationalism. These globo-homo imperialist are even worse than imperialists of old who, at the very least, felt loyalty to their mother country, e.g. British Imperialists believed in Queen and Country, French Imperialists believed in the French Republic, and Japanese Imperialists believed in Sacred Japan. In contrast, globo-homo imperialists in the US see the US itself as just another colony. So, the US isn't the core base, fortress motherland, of their power projection. Rather, the US itself must be invaded and taken over by globalism. In contrast, even as British Imperialists took over foreign domains, they made sure foreigners didn't take over Britain. Of course, today's UK is the same as the US. It takes part in globo-homo imperialism to support Wars for Israel, spread hate and paranoia against whatever Jews hate, and welcomes massive Third World invasion to turn UK into something like North Africa + Pakistan. Granted, there is ONE nation that globo-homo imperialism protects and safeguards as worthy of national survival and sovereignty, and that is, of course, Israel. Globo-homo Imperialism is Mono-Nationalist in insisting that Jews and Only Jews are deserving of national identity, national pride, and national territory. All other peoples and lands must put out to endless waves of globo-homo madness, be they in the form of military invasions, economic sanctions, homomania, jungle fever, and demographic transformation via endless immigration-invasions. Globo-Homo says NO to Poly-Nationalism that respects the identities and territories of all peoples.

White people must learn from the Jewish Way of Power. While demography is destiny, so is elitocracy. After all, Latin America is majority non-white, but whites have managed to hold most of the power. And Jews have economic dominance in South Africa, and Asian-Indians have most politicians in their pockets in Kenya and some other African nations. And Chinese minorities have immense clout in Southeast Asian nations. And Jews, though even a tinier minority in Europe than in the US, have tremendous sway over UK, France, Russia, Germany, and etc.
Now, gaining elitocratic power isn't easy. Jews lucked out due to higher IQ, stronger personality & will, and long historical experience of networking in the diaspora. So, no people can just gain elitocratic power... just like most people can't make it in professional sports simply because they want to or work hard at it. Genetics favors blacks in brawn, and genetics favors Jews in brains. Still, as the saying goes, there is more than one way to skin a cat.

Even with all the censorship and deplatforming, there are many ways by which whites can get their voices heard to strike fear into the heart of the ruling power. For inspiration, whites should look to Ilhan Omar and BDS movement. Omar has very little power in Congress as a freshman representative. But with a few tweets, she has made the entire Jewish Establishment shake in their boots. If ONE politician can make a difference, imagine what several more could do? And then even more? Now, one may argue that she's been able to get away with this because she is black, a woman, and Muslim. Jewish Power, in order to smear Donald Trump as a 'Islamophobe', elevated people like Omar in the hope that she would only bash 'evil racist conservatives', but she struck out at the Lobby as well, and if anything, all those 'evil racist' Republicans came to the aid of Jewish Power. ROTFL.
Jews: "Omar, we noble Jews support you against those evil racist white male Republicans."
White Republicans: "Dear Noble Jews, we cucky-wuck white Christians support you Jews against that vile and evil anti-Semite Ilhan Omar." Imagine Bill recruits Bob to beat up John. So, Bob beats up John while Bill cackles with hideous glee. But then, Bob turns around and slaps Bill. Now, how should John react? He should be cheering on Bob for beating on Bill for a change, right? But in US politics, John denounces Bob for beating on Bill even though Bill got Bob to beat up John. Jews use Muslims to beat up whites -- Jews also use whites to beat up Muslims in the Middle East -- , but when Muslims badmouth Jewish supremacist power, whites grovel before Jews and offer them protection from Muslims. Jews get an attack dog to maul whites, but when the dog barks at Jews, whites denounce the dog for daring to defy the master. Then, it's no wonder why whites are losing in the US. Never mind all these elections. The main reason why whites lose is they are most slavish to the very people who are most hellbent on white destruction. Why are whites so slavish? Because there isn't a single White America. There are two Americas ideologically and culturally. Ideologically, so many whites have been brainwashed to be self-loathing that they welcome their own demise and hate whites who want to survive and preserve the white way. Economically, there is comprador white America and rest of white America. While white cucky-wuckery is despicable, it pays very well at the top. Look at the wealth and status of the likes of Paul Ryan and Mitt Romney. So, even though cucky-wuck white elites will also lose White America, they have it so good as 'house honkeys' who snub their noses at 'field honkeys'.

This is why White America needs a new kind of power game independent of electoral politics. Consider ADL and NAACP. Or SPLC. These are not political parties but hold great sway in American Narrative and discourse. And consider the rising power of BDS despite all the nails strewn on the road to burst its tires. The effective thing about those organizations is they always have a voice regardless of who wins elections. In politics, only the winner gains the platform, and since he won with money from donors, he really has nothing to say but 'cuckity-cuckity-cuck'(like some blacks have nothing to say but blackity-blackity-black). Palestinian-Americans finally have ONE politician in Congress, but that's not where their real power is. It's in the BDS movement and effective use of alternative media. The reason why Jews dread BDS far more than Neo-Nazis or KKK is because BDS narrative makes Jews out to be the supremacist tyrants over the Palestinians as the people in bondage. BDS cuts to the chase like the boy in EMPEROR'S NEW CLOTHES and points to Jewish Power as the dominant force in US politics. Jews denounce it as 'antisemitic', but as long as Palestinians spell out the facts of what is really happening in the Middle East, Jews cannot win the argument. And this is why Jews are loathe to openly debate with BDS. So, they use extralegal means to criminalize BDS. They pay off politicians to attack anti-Zionism as same as 'antisemitism'. Jewish power was so afraid of the Aljajeera documentary THE LOBBY that they lobbied to have it shut down, but it leaked out anyway(like the truth about Michael Jackson), and it revealed an ugly reality about Jewish Power and its pernicious effect on media, academia, and politics.



What white people need is something like BDS, ADL, NAACP, and etc. Some organization or movement that always gives voice to white concerns REGARDLESS OF who wins elections. Alt Right could have played this role, but fool Richard Spencer and cohorts insanely ran on White Supremacism 202. Jews would never have gained power in the US had they openly played their game on the basis of Jewish Supremacism. People would have told Jews to go to hell. Jews, being clever, ran on challenging WASP privilege and white power(often associated with supremacist groups or 'racist' laws). Thus, Jewish Power Grab came across as ennobled by association with combating unfair white domination and discrimination. Of course, Jews were not trying to be equal with rest of America but merely weakening White Elite Power so that Jewish Power could replace it. But, the lesson to learn is that Jews moralized their agenda with a theory of justice. In contrast, there was Richard Spencer the fool pontificating about how he and a new Aryan aristocracy deserve to rule because they are like James Bond crossed with Darth Vader. He should write comic book fantasies. A movement so devoid of moral element has no legs to stand on, especially in the US where the concept(though usually a conceit) of 'human rights' is so important in public consciousness. The fatf*** Matt Heimbach was yet another clown. He could have done something worthy by championing the white working class faced with a host of problems ranging from 'free trade' outsourcing to opioid crisis. He gave lip-service to some of these concerns but just couldn't resist putting on Nazi helmets and playing fat fuhrer, which made it so easy for the MSM to paint him as Neo-Nazi(and it seems the moron is really that). I suppose it's more fun to 'larp' as superhero white-knights than roll up the sleeves to do some real work. All this arrogance and hubris led to the fall of the Alt Right... just like the implosion of the Black Panthers who overestimated their awesomeness. Cucky-wuckery is bad, but so is Cocky-Wockery. As Harry Callahan said in MAGNUM FORCE, "A man's got to know his limitations."

This is why a truly effective white movement must emphasize White LIBERATION and White EMANCIPATION. The notion of 'liberation' and 'emancipation' raises the question of 'freedom and independence from WHAT or WHOM?' And that is when whites can make a most effective and potent case against Jewish Power as the ruling and dominant power in the US. For proof, listen to this local-yokel from Montana in the video below. Even before she could run her campaign, Jewish supremacists descended on her like locusts and made her sign this, that, and everything under the sun for Jewish-Zionist interests. She admits she didn't even know where Israel was on the map. As a person of Montana, she wanted to do something for her own people, but Jewish Power made her offers she couldn't refuse.


Now, we can't expect political hacks and puppets to speak honestly to Power. US democracy is a mere shell. It's like hermit-crab-democracy, where the shell exists but without the original organism that has been replaced by another organism that uses the shell for its own purposes. Call it shellocracy or shillocracy, but US politicians are puppets and can't be trusted to do anything.
This is why blacks have often turned to NAACP and even Nation of Islam. Given that NAACP is so controlled by Jewish money, there is more truth coming from Nation of Islam though its ideology is poisonous and its leader, Farrakhan, though courageous, is a pathological nut. Still, Nation of Islam is invaluable in some ways because it often voices truths that no one is willing to talk about. Now, it is morally compromised because it stands for its own brand of supremacism on some crackpot theory about Yakub grafting the evil white race out of the black race, and etc. It has the same problem as Spencer's Alt Right that, even as it bitches about Jewish power, dreams of a white supremacist world in which Spencer as 007 with Darth Vader helmet conquers all the world and humps all the girls.

A true white movement must honestly and courageously speak truth to the Power and demand emancipation of whites from Jewish supremacism, Zionist imperialism, the false god of globohomo degeneracy(spread by Jews), jungle-fever-black-supremacism(that says inferior white males must hand over their white women to Negro men and then die of opioids), and mass invasions that seek to turn whites into defeated & defamed minorities all over the world. (And being an anti-supremacist movement, it must say NO to anyone associated with KKK and Neo-Nazi craziness, many of whom are either Feds or psychos.) And to drive home this point, whites must draw parallels between whites and Palestinians. Ann Coulter and others try to shame the Jews by asking, "How come Israel can defend its borders but US and European nations can't?" But this is a bogus question because Israel is not defending its borders. Israel is already secure as can be. Palestinians cannot re-enter and even African migrant-invaders have been shut out. What Israel is doing is not defense but offense. Zionist Caravans are streaming into West Bank and taking over land, water, houses, and all the resources. It is the Palestinians who are denied the right of border, security, autonomy, and sovereignty. Sound familiar? Is the situation of White Americans closer to that of Jews in Israel or Palestinians in West Bank? It's obviously the latter. Whites are being mocked, defamed, and ridiculed constantly by the power just like Palestinians in West Bank and Gaza are. Now, just imagine the shit storm -- a damn healthy and necessary one -- IF Ann Coulter or some prominent Conservative were to draw parallels between Whites in US/Europe and Palestinians in West Bank. Imagine what would happen if Ann Coulter said whites can't do anything to protect their own nations just like Palestinians cannot preserve the last remnants of West Bank because both whites and Palestinians are under neo-imperialist globo-homo hegemony of the Same Power: Jewish Supremacism.

This is why we need leaders, spokesmen, and movements OUTSIDE politics. Because Jews, homos, and blacks lacked the numbers to take over government outright, they mastered the art of creating non-political organizations to get the message out and drive the agenda. In contrast, most whites just relied on going to voting booths every 4 yrs. This used to be effective for whites in the past because they were the overwhelming majority and because US politicians weren't always beholden to Jewish power or PC dogma. There was a time when white masses elected white politicians who felt some real connection to the people of the community. That is no more. Politicians are useless. Congress is a rubberstamp parliament of the Zionist globo-homo deep state complex.

As whites are poised to lose even electoral majorities in US and European nations in the coming future(mainly due to Jewish PC and money power), they must drop the defensive shields and craft sharpened swords & spears for concentrated attack on the TOP POWER. Just hiding behind the ever-crumbling demographic shield isn't sufficient for whites to keep any meaningful power in the West. Whites must go on the offensive, but against what? Never fight a two-front war, as the Germans found out in WWI and WWII. Go for the main enemy first, and once that falls, move the forces against other enemies. Jewish power is not only the main enemy but the linchpin of the anti-white war wagon. If it goes, the wheels come off. It was Jewish power that was most instrumental in pushing for destructive & supremacist Wars for Israel, mass immigration-invasion & cult of Diversity(which is mainly a strength for Jewish elites hellbent on playing divide and rule among diverse goyim), jungle fever(to weaken white male pride and destroy white female beauty, much hated by resentful & envious Jewish feminists), the new normal of cucky-wuckery(to turn white men into a bunch of sappy dogs that growl and bark ONLY in service to their Jewish masters), Homomania as replacement for true spirituality(such as Christianity) and true morality, and the Cult of Compulsory Hate(whereby all goyim in the West must hate and revile whatever Jews hate: Russia, Iran, Syria, you name it). If Jews love, we must love. Since Jews love themselves, we must love Jews. Since Jews hate Iran, we must hate Iran.
This is why white people need emancipation from Jewish supremacist power. A free people have autonomy of emotions, and they choose for themselves what they love and what they hate. But under the current domination of Jewish supremacism, 'hate speech' is totally controlled by Jews. So, whites must support Jewish hatred against Palestinians, Iranians, Syrians, Russians, and Christian Conservatives as 'liberal democracy' while denouncing calls for independence and autonomy from Soros-ian globo-homo madness as 'far-right hate', 'autocracy', and 'extremism'. Why should Jews be the hands and goyim be the clay? Do Jews allow goyim to mold Jewish brains and hearts to think and feel in certain ways that favor goy interests over Jewish interests? Whenever whites tried to control Jews, Jews said NO THANKS and even NO WAY! Jews insisted on thinking for themselves and forming their own emotions/passions on issues of the world, esp as pertaining to Jewish interests. Then, it is only right that whites stopped letting their hearts and minds be used as clay by Jewish hands. Whites must turn into hands and mold their own destiny.

Look at Ilhan Omar. The tweets of one black Muslim woman made Jewish Power tremble in fear. Imagine what 5 or 10 Ilhan Omars can do? Imagine what would happen if a bit of Ilhan Omar sprouted in the hearts and minds of whites. That would be the start of the White Liberation Movement.

My Suspicion: Patrick Little is a Federal Agent of ZOG

I can’t help thinking Patrick Little is a federal agent or some shill of globo-homo Jewish Supremacism. I have no smoking gun, but gut instinct tells me something is not quite right about his persona. With Paul Nehlen, his kooky direction wasn't all that surprising because, let’s face it, the guy isn’t very bright. An immature dimwit and goofball(who, as it turned out, was only ‘larping’ as a mainstream candidate), he was easily manipulated by 4chan trolls and the like. He went from a semi-serious candidate to something like the Pee-Wee-Herman of the 14/88 crowd simply because he was flattered by all the ‘love’ he got from trolls and nutters.
In contrast, Patrick Little comes across as a bright guy with a sharp mind. So, unless he happens to be funny in a head(a real possibility, I suppose), it’s safe to assume that he’s putting on an act. But for whom? As a general rule, when something happens, it’s useful to ask, "Which side benefited most from it?" Then, it is also useful to ask "Which side was most harmed by it?" With Patrick Little’s series of ‘campaigns’(or stunts), it’s obvious that the biggest casualty has been the Moral Stance against Jewish Supremacism. If Patrick Little had started out as a hotheaded Neo-Nazi blowhard, the only thing he would have discredited is 14/88 nonsense. Instead, Little arrived on the scene by denouncing Zionist Imperialism, Jewish Supremacism, and Globo-Homo craziness that swept over the West(and even the Rest). These were all morally sane, tenable, and necessary positions. If supremacism is toxic and must be rooted out in the US, all honest and rational people should admit that the dominant supremacy that animates the American Way(at home and abroad) is Jewish Supremacy. It molds and holds everything from finance, high-tech, gambling, media, entertainment, law firms, courts, Pentagon, and whore politicians. Jewish supremacists sound alarm about ‘hate speech’ to shut down Free Speech and Free Spend, but the truth is that American Hate is mainly defined by Jewish control of US foreign and domestic policy. US favors Zionist Imperialists over Palestinians who live under Occupation. Why? Because Jewish Supremacists love Zionism and murderously hate Palestinians. Jews control Pop Music industry and have used Rap music to spread virulently murderous messages of street thugs, promoting gang violence that killed countless lives. Jewish anti-white hatred and anti-Christian contempt are spewed by the Jew-run media 24/7. Jews push for White Genocide by promoting replacist Mass-Immigration-Invasion and ACOWW(or Afro-Colonization of White Wombs that implies that INFERIOR white men must surrender their women to SUPERIOR black men). US animus against Iran, Syria, and Russia is all the result of Jewish globo-homo hatred against defiant nations that won’t kowtow to the demands of the Empire of Judea(EOJ).

If the US were truly a white supremacist nation, would the main themes of media, academia, and the Deep State be ‘white people should be overrun and replaced with non-whites’, ‘white women must reject inferior white men and go with superior black men’, ‘white Americans must hate white Russians’, ‘Western Christianity must be replaced with Homomania’, ‘Southern Heritage must be destroyed’, ‘white young ones should worship rappers’, and etc? Seriously, if the US were truly run by ‘white supreamcists’, as so many Jews hyperventilate all the time, would those be the biggest current themes? Then, why are those themes so predominant in so many areas of American Life and Thought? Why did so many white people fall under the sway of such hateful and demented anti-white craziness? It’s because the US is really a Jewish-Supremacist nation, one where globo-homo Zionist-imperialists get to program the media and rig the system to push policies that are deemed ‘Good for Jews’ and ‘Bad for Whites’(or 'Bad for any people hated by Jews').
For those reasons, it is a moral imperative for all good white people to stand up to Jewish Supremacism and its culture of hate, contempt, murderousness, hubris, toxicity, duplicity, and hypocrisy. When faced against an immoral power, the most potent weapon is a moral argument. The Goliath of Falsehood fears the David of Moral Truth. And initially, despite his outlandish antics, Patrick Little garnered attention as a loud, brazen, and courageous speaker of truth to Jewish Power. Even though he had zero chance of becoming Senator of California, he entered the race to make his case against tyrannical Jewish Power and globo-homo imperialist reach around the world. And because of this, he garnered sympathy from individuals of all stripes. As a clever trollitician, he could have spread many effective memes highlighting how the US is really ruled by power-hungry Jewish Supremacists and how all of humanity(not just white people) have so much to lose as the result of the machinations of men like George Soros and institutions in the US and EU that are essentially controlled by Jewish oligarchs and their agent-enforcers. Surely, any sane person would have learned from the David Duke case that it makes no sense to be associated with KKK or Neo-Nazi nonsense. Now, Little didn’t join the KKK(like Duke stupidly did once) or the American Nazi Party. But by spewing Neo-Nazi talking-points, Patrick Little effectively associated his initial morally valid condemnations of Jewish supremacism with a form of White Supremacism. If your moral objective is to condemn supremacism(of Jews or any other group), how does it help your argument to support or apologize for the supremacism of your own race? What’s the point of morally condemning Jewish supremacism to argue for White Supremacism? Now, Little will deny that he is any such, but by regurgitating much of 14/88 nonsense on Hitler and the wonders of Nazi Germany, he has associated himself with a supremacist ideology that triggered a war that killed 50 million white people in Europe.

Now, why would Little do this? He doesn’t seem like a dumb person. He comes across as sober and intelligent. Why would he do something so reckless and retarded? Why make a moral case against Jewish Supremacism but then morally discredit oneself by shilling for German Supremacism of the Nazis. If Hitler and Nazi Ideology weren’t supremacist, what is?
One possible explanation is that Patrick Little became so angry with Jews that he came to endorse anything associated with anti-Jewishness in kneejerk fashion. If true, it means Little is too unhinged and impulsive to be a moral voice. A moral person must try to maintain his equilibrium of honesty and integrity against the pressures of passion. Now, given what so many Jews are doing to the white race, Palestinians & Arabs, Russians, Iranians, Christians, white people, and decent folks around the world, it is understandable why so many people are angry with Jews and even hate them. According to ADL and such vile organizations, there is something wrong with ‘not liking Jews’ as if it is the duty of all of mankind to like Jews. But why? Liking or hating a people should always be conditional. If Jews are good to you and act with honor, there are reasons to like them. If Jews treat you horribly, why should you like them? It'd make good sense to dislike or hate them. But, by the logic of ADL, Jews should be unconditionally revered like they’re gods or something. We must make offering to the Great Jews no matter what they do to us. Jew-Worship is like a pagan practice of mass-human-sacrifice, one where amoral gods must be obeyed and appeased no matter what they do. Jew-Worship says Jews are like a race of gods, therefore we must revere and obey them regardless of whether they are good or bad. Indeed, because Jews are so ‘holy’, whatever they do and demand must be ‘good’. With Jews, good-or-bad isn’t determined by rules but by identity, i.e. Jews are good because they are Jews, and what Jews do is good because Jews did it. So, if Hungary shuts its borders to mass-invaders, that is bad because Jews don’t like it. But if Jews do the same in Israel to protect the borders, it is good because Jews like it. Jews are the master, and we are dogs for whom the issue of 'good or bad' is simply a matter of 'master likes it' or 'master hates it'. We are to have no moral agency of our own. White people having moral agency is 'white supremacism' in the Jewish Supremacist Rule-book. It is a case of bad uppity doggy that won't no longer fetch the slippers and the newspaper. Only Jews get to decide, and white people exist only to obey and agree. Jews got the rod, and whites just nod.

With Jews, moral rules are impossible in the Current Year because Jewish supremacist power insists on a kind of ethno-nihilism. What is GOOD FOR JEWS is good. That’s just about it. And what Jews deem as BAD FOR JEWS is bad because it displeases Jews. So, good or bad is a matter of Jewish pleasure of displeasure. This is obviously supremacism, and Patrick Little made a splash by calling out on Jewish arrogance, contempt, and hypocrisy. His campaign seemed like a stunt from the beginning, but it was spunky and feisty. And he won respect from various peoples and groups because he was willing to say what the Establishment Parties were afraid to say.

The True Sinead McCarthy

But what did he soon do? He began to talk 14/88 nonsense about Hitler as a great man and how WWII was entirely the fault of everyone but the Germans. Alarm bells should have gone off here. Little’s shtick is so much like that of Sinead McCarthy, a red-head who appeared on the Counter-Culture Right a few years ago. She thrust herself as an irreverent maverick unafraid to poke fun at sacred cows. While some of her stuff was willfully offensive and outlandish, people excused it as your typically racy troll behavior. But it wasn’t long before she pushed for Flat Earth Theory and began to accuse every other person in the Alt Right as ‘homosexual’. Then, it became obvious that she was either a total kook or an agent for an organization like SPLC, especially as photos emerged that exposed her as part of the POC gang(and possible 'mudshark').
What do Little and McCarthy have in common? They seem to be rather bright and knowledgeable about lots of things. So, why would Little make so much good sense about Jewish power and then sabotage his own moral credibility with boilerplate apologia for Hitler and Nazis? And why would Sinead McCarthy, who billed herself as a rebel and maverick, claim to believe that the World is Flat? How can someone be skeptical about the Jewish Narrative but so trusting of the utter nonsense of Flat Earth Theory? It seems McCarthy’s shtick was to associate any opposition to Jewish Power & Narrative with cuckoo astronomy & superstition. And it appears Patrick Little’s plan is to keep associating moral opposition to Jewish supremacism with support for Hitler and Nazis who stood for Aryan Supremacism.

Thankfully, few people take Patrick Little seriously anymore, just like most people in the Dissident Right dropped McCarthy like a hot potato once she began to spout nonsense about the World being Flat and how every other guy in the Alt Right is a homo. It just goes to show that we need to be vigilant at all times against infiltrators... or nutjobs.

Google, Facebook, Twitter, Paypal, and etc. became MONOPOLIES on the basis of Neutrality and Fairness. Therefore, They have No Justification to now Censor People and Deny Service on the basis of Identity + Ideology.

Some argue that Google, Facebook, Twitter, Paypal, and other Internet Monopolies have the right to censor or deny services to just about anyone because they are private companies. But this argument is utterly bogus. They are not merely companies but monopolies, and furthermore, they got to be so HUGE because they offered their products and services to all of us with the promise of fairness, integrity, and neutrality. After all, Google’s motto used to be "Don’t do evil". Now, ‘evil’ is a vague term, but the general understanding was that Google would not rig the system to favor certain interests over others. It would play the role of a fair arbiter and referee. As for Twitter, it expanded worldwide because of its stated commitment to Free Speech. It presented itself as a forum providing free exchange of ideas even for those living in repressive un-democratic nations. And Paypal had no stated ideological agendas. It offered payment processing services to people around the world. And it is precisely for those reasons that so many people of all identities and ideologies signed up to use their services. It was on the assumption that the companies would act fairly and without favor to any one particular group. Would any of them have become the behemoths they are now IF, in their incarnations, they'd stated their long-term ideological and tribal goals outright? No, many people would have refused their services and gravitated toward other alternative platforms. Why would so many people have signed up for services and products by companies that pledge to push agendas against their kind? For example, if Twitter had stated from the very beginning that it would favor globalists, Zionists, the Deep State, anti-white cretins, nasty blacks, homosexuals & trannies, crazed feminists, and the like WHILE targeting conservatives, moral people, white folks, Palestinians, race-realists, Christians, pro-family people, patriots, nationalists, and etc for shadow-banning, censorship, and blacklisting, countless millions of people would never have signed up with Twitter. People of all ideological convictions signed up to Twitter because the word was that Twitter does not play favorites: It lives by principles, integrity, and basic sense of fairness. It doesn’t favor agendas by ideology or identity EVEN IF most Twitter employees happen to lean in a particular way politically. Our understanding was that Twitter employees' politics would be a personal matter and not affect their professionalism as maintainers of a social platform committed to Free Speech.

All these companies didn’t gain prominence simply by appealing to one side of the ideological spectrum or favoring one identity over another. Google didn’t start out by saying, "Our system will favor Progs over Conservatives, globalists over nationalists, Zionists over Palestinians, homos & trannies over natural-normal decent folks." If it had been forthright about its long-term political and cultural agenda, there is no doubt that most peoples disfavored by Google Jews would never have used the service, thereby preventing its becoming a Search Engine Monopoly around the world hogging over 85% of the traffic. Google got BIG on the promise and pledge of neutrality and fairness. People signed up and used the service because they thought they could trust Google to stick to its pledge of "Don’t be evil."
Imagine if Paypal had stated in its startup phase that it would favor certain identities and ideologies while denying service to a whole spectrum of identities and ideologies, especially those related to Palestinian causes, white identity, and Natural Morality, the kind that believes it makes zero sense to celebrate homo fecal penetration & tranny penis-cutting. Many people would have thought twice about signing up for Paypal. The success of all those companies(even to the point of becoming global monopolies) depended on their ideological neutrality. Imagine if Paypal had been started up by a bunch of white nationalist-patriots who sympathize with Palestinians, and suppose their stated purpose for the company was to favor white patriots, Palestinians, pro-family people, and Christians while denying service to a host of Zionist figures(on the basis of Jewish Hate and Tyranny against Palestinians), radical feminists, Deep State globalists(for their wanton destruction of the Middle East via Wars for Israel), and homo-tranny radicals(for spreading degeneration and perversion as hate propaganda against morality and normality). If such had been the stated principles of the company, then we know that many people would not have signed up for Paypal because its values and agenda offend them. Even moderate Liberals and Progressives might not have signed up(even if they wouldn’t have been denied service) because they find the notion of a company censoring or denying service to their ideological allies to be offensive. Indeed, if a white-nationalist-patriot-run Paypal had hidden its long-term agenda and persuaded countless millions to sign up to its service on the promise of ideological neutrality, then it would have a responsibility to stick to those principles. After all, the ONLY reason why so many people signed up was on the basis that the company has no ideological bias.
Now, suppose this white-nationalist-patriot Paypal grew super-huge into a monopoly by pretending to be ideologically unbiased but, upon gaining near-total-dominance, decided to purge a whole bunch of people deemed to be Zionist haters, globalist-imperialists, homo-tranny degenerates, radical feminists, and etc. Even if most moderate Liberals and Progressives are not denied service, wouldn’t they feel cheated that they’d been led to sign up on the premise of the company's ideological neutrality? Their memberships made the company a dominant player in global business, but suddenly, the company targets many people on the ‘leftist’ side of the spectrum. And Jewish members are left wondering why Zionists are being especially targeted for ‘hate speech’ when Palestinian anti-Zionist 'hate speech' is not only allowed by endorsed.

In retrospect, all these companies became behemoths and monopolies via false advertising. They couldn’t have become so big if they’d stated their ideological biases in their start-up phase. After all, if a company says it will go out of its way to favor ONE side while discriminating against the OTHER, then people on the Other side will support another company that especially caters to them. If a hamburger chain opens with the express ideological statement against conservatives, then most conservatives will not patronize the place. They will look for another chain that caters especially to conservatives and works against liberals. The reason why certain businesses got so big is that they claimed to be ideologically neutral and unbiased. Thus, they pulled customers from the entire ideological spectrum and from all identities. McDonalds and Walmart didn’t start out by saying they’ll favor certain kind of customers with particular ideological views while disfavoring other kinds of customers. The understanding was that, regardless of your identity or ideology, if you order their products, you will be treated well as a customer. If either company had started out with a stated ideological bias, it would have alienated tons of customers.
Now, imagine if Walmart, upon gaining retail supremacy, declares that it will treat customers with certain ideological bias better than other customers. So, certain customers will get discounts and special deals while other kinds of customers will be over-charged or banned from stores. That would be pretty lousy, wouldn’t it, especially since the company got SO BIG by having led all Americans into believing that it’s a fair and neutral retail outlet for ALL customers.

Same logic applies to the Internet Monopolies. They got so big because they promised neutrality, fairness, and lack of bias. Google didn’t start out saying that its search engines will favor globalists over nationalist, progs over conservatives, homos & trannies over natural-normal folks, and etc. When it turned out that some Jews in Israel rigged the engine to hide Pat Buchanan from search recommendations, Google quickly fixed the problem. So, we were led to be believe that, while there were some bad apples at Google, the top management was committed to fairness and neutrality. But now, we know that the rottenest apples are at the very top of Google. Indeed, the Google Jews fooled us into believing that they have integrity & principle and would not stoop so low to rig the algorithms to favor their agenda. If insider-trading is illegal, why isn’t insider-algorithm-rigging illegal, especially when Google search results affect the lives of countless peoples around the world? There was a time when Google started out as a little guy, and perhaps, it did identify with the upstarts, mavericks, rebels, and the like. But once Google became one of the biggest companies in the world, its CEO’s and oligarchs identified with the Deep State, Establishment, Globo-Homo Hegemony, and Zionist Tyranny. But then, even when they were starting at the ‘bottom’, Google Jews were elitists with connections with some of the most powerful people in America and the world. And given their tribal links with Israelis who oppress Palestinians, for how long could Google be equally fair to Jews and Palestinians? The history of the Google Doodle illustrates how the company became increasingly more ideological and tribal. It became ever more Jewish-supremacist, and its ideology was the globo-homo kind meant to subvert and undermine the cultures and values of all goy nations. (The fact that Google and other Jew-dominated companies are not really leftist can be seen in the fact that Google Doodles never celebrate Palestinian heroes and martyrs. And given that 2018 is the 70th anniversary of the Nakba Pogroms that wiped Palestine off the map, you’d think Google would do *something* to honor the tragedy of the powerless and helpless Palestinians. Aren’t leftists supposed to care for the underdog, the downtrodden, and wretched of the earth? If Google is really leftist, where is its concern for Palestinians? Name one doodle in honor in Yasser Arafat or for the brave Palestinian children who took part in the Intifada. And if Google is really leftist, why hasn’t it condemned the globalist imperialist Wars for Israel that turned the Middle East upside down? Why no Google Doodle to commemorate all the Muslims or Arabs[many of them Christian] maimed or killed by these Zionist-made wars? Google, like so many Jews, are only faux-leftists. They don’t care about the downtrodden, the poor, and the wretched of the earth. They only care about wealth, privilege, power, and monopoly, mostly to be concentrated in Jewish hands.
Jews are tribal supremacists who invoke symbolic ideology to appear ‘progressive’, which in our time, mainly means worship of homos and trannies, a practice that only goes to help the rich and powerful since the vain & narcissistic homos and trannies love to cater to the wealthy and powerful.)

The Jewish Factor is all-important in the understanding of how these internet giants operate. The rigged game isn’t only about ideology. It’s not really about Left vs Right. With Jews, it’s all about manipulating ideology to serve identity. Jews hide behind ‘leftism’ to give the impression that they are for ‘social justice’ and the ‘little guy’. In fact, they are for the minority elite supremacists, namely themselves. Jews promote ‘leftism’ to encourage the gentile majority to turn against itself. Jews want whites to be ‘leftist’ in siding with non-whites(and Jews) against white patriots. It’s classic divide-and-rule strategy. These white ‘leftists’ are never supposed to notice that Jews got the Real Power. Consider Michael Moore who makes so much noise about Big Money but never says anything about Jews. He’s a useful tool for the Tribe. Even when Neocon Jews were instigating 9/11, Moore only went after Bush and Big Oil when, in fact, it was the Big Jew, not Big Oil, that clamored for Wars for Israel. The clearest indication that Jews support ‘leftist’ ideology only as a ploy can be seen in the case of Jeremy Corbyn. Like him or not, Corbyn takes his leftism more seriously than others. He sees the world in terms of the lowly masses(of all the world) vs the elites. So, he naturally sides with brown Arabs and Palestinians against Jewish bankers and elites. So, how have so-called Jewish ‘leftists’ responded to this? With favor and sympathy? No, with utmost vitriol. You see, ‘leftism’ is wonderful when Jews can use it to ideologically divide whites into two camps at each other’s throats. But, when it is used more sincerely and consistently, as when white leftists ally with brown masses against Jewish elites(who control the Anglo cuck-collaborator elites), Jews flip out and foam at the mouth.
This is why people who call Google, Facebook, Twitter, and Paypal ‘leftist’ are really doing a favor to the Jewish Oligarchs of Big Tech. It makes rich and powerful Jews sigh with relief. It gives the false impression that Silicon Valley is run by people who really care about the downtrodden, the less privileged, and the marginalized. That is, of course, a total myth. Silicon Valley is run by super-rich Jewish supremacists who fully support the Deep State, the Warfare state, Wall Street financial gangsterism, the ‘new cold war’ with Russia, the strangulation of Iran, Homomania(the quasi-religious cult of globalism), and the Zionist tyranny over Palestinians. These Jews work with cuck-white-collaborators and with Asian-Indian elites(some of whom are oligarchs themselves) who are totally obsessed with money, power, and privilege. By hiring some publicity clowns to make ‘progressive’-seeming doodles or gestures, companies like Google manufacture the impression that it’s all about the ‘little guy’ or the ‘oppressed’. It’s about as convincing as the aristocratic elites of Old Europe feigning humility and piety via Christian rituals ostensibly about atonement and sacrifice. (How sincerely spiritual was Michael Corleone when he stood in the Church as godfather for the child whose father he was plotting to kill? Jewish elites use 'leftism' like the Mafia used the Catholic Church. As moral perfume to mask the stench of power.)

In fact, the only thing most aristocrats ever cared about was their own vanity, privilege, and power. Power eventually comes to obsess over itself. We saw this with communist elites who gradually turned into the new Power Elites whose main objective was to maintain power for its own sake. Behind the symbolism and chorus of righteousness, everything turns ‘fascist’. Look what happened to the once idealistic boomer generation. They became the Clintons. They became the likes of Joe Biden and John Kerry, once an anti-war activist but ultimately just another operative of the Deep State using American Power in a game of neo-imperialist hegemony.

This is why the current censorship makes no sense purely from an ideological viewpoint. After all, most of the Real Left sympathizes with the Palestinians against Zionist Occupiers. And yet, the behavior of Google, Facebook, Twitter, Paypal, and etc. are all geared to favor Zionists and Jewish supremacists. Members of BDS that tried to highlight the 70th anniversary of the Nakba pogroms were banned from Twitter.

Much of Google is operated from Israel, and those working on the algorithms are nasty vicious Zionist Jews. Facebook is working with Neocon warmongers to shut down ‘hate speech’. Now, any honest person would say the most consequentially hateful speech is Zionist Imperialism. In its name, an entire people have been ethnically cleansed, humiliated, brutalized, occupied, and periodically killed in escalations of violence. And in the name of securing the supremacy of Israel, Zionists in the US have hatched one crazy war plot after another resulting in ruined nations all across Middle East and North Africa. And if Jews don’t destroy nations with US and Israel bombs, it is with financial strangulation. Since the US controls much of Asia and EU, nations like Japan, Germany, UK, and France do like the US tells them to. And since Jews run the US, most of the advanced world is about serving Jews. And even nations like Russia and China that have sovereignty are affected by this Jewish supremacist power because they rely on world trade dominated by the US that is dominated by Jews.

We need to identify and label Jewish power properly. Calling it ‘leftist’ does it too much credit, and indeed, that is exactly what Jews want. The concept of the ‘Alt Right’ was flawed in that it too saw the world in terms of right vs left. In fact, a people need both leftism and rightism. This is the necessary truth of neo-fascism. Indeed, such is the formula for Jewish success. Jews don’t divide themselves into Jewish Left against Jewish Right and vice versa. No, the secret of Zionism was meaningfully integrating Jewish nationalism with socialism and capitalism. Only stupid children see the world in terms of black-and-white. This was the great promise of Fascism, but Mussolini and Hitler failed in the first round because of the Cult of Personality and Imperialism. And this is also why Zionism has failed morally. Had it been merely a nationalist phenomenon, it would have made political and moral sense. But, it turned imperialist, megalomaniacal-supremacist, and pathological in its hegemonic ambitions. Jews have become the New Nazis, or Judeo-Nazis. When people like Stefan Molyneux, Paul Joseph Watson, Nicholas Fuentes, James Allsup, Richard Spencer, Ann Coulter, Tucker Carlson, and the rest of them refer to Big Tech as ‘leftist’, the Silicon Valley Jew-oligarchs are loving it and laughing their asses off. Here they are, playing the Power Game of supremacy as Tribal Jewish Hegemonists, and a bunch of Alt-Right, Alt-Lite, and Conservative types are calling them ‘leftists’, creating the impression that all those super-rich psychopathic Jewish supremacists who aid-and-abet in the ruthless tyranny over Palestinians are a bunch of naive do-gooders whose hearts melt at ‘little people’. If anything, many in the Alt Right are far more leftist(in the genuine sense) than Jewish globalists are.
The trick is to avoid something as extreme as communism. We don’t need pure leftism, just like we don’t need pure rightism. We need a healthy combination of Left and Right. Left-Right, not ‘Alt Right’, is the real formula for truth, justice, and success. Without Rightism, leftism has no focus or gravity. No ideology can be totally universal and about ALL people. It’s difficult enough to manage, protect, and preserve your own nation. Imagine if your people had to take care of three or four nations. Next, imagine if your people had to take care of all the world. Swedes are discovering how stupid their ‘moral superpower’ posturing really is. Not only is it naive and silly, it’s arrogant and closet-supremacist. Swedes seem to believe that they must take care of other nations and peoples because most of the world is incapable of doing so on its own. It’s as if Swedes are overly qualified to manage their own nation only with its small population. With their surplus energy and talent, they should take care of Africa and Middle East too. Now, it’s not a bad thing to lend help to less fortunate or capable peoples. But it’s a mad sign of hubris to believe that one’s own people could play moral superman to the world. This is why Leftism must revolve around a Rightist Core. That way, the idealism of leftism has a specific gravity and purpose. Just like Leftism needs a rightist gravitational core, Rightism needs leftist expansiveness. Imagine a society where the ruling elites only care about their own power, privilege, and prestige. Suppose they snub and look down on the masses as dirty, ignorant, and worthless. Aristocrats treated serfs in such manner. And today, Jewish supremacist elites have ordered their white cuck-collaborate elites to look upon the white masses in the same way: As Trash. This is why Jews are faux-leftists. They don’t care about the white masses. Jews fear that a left-right unity among white elites and white masses(as during the New Deal and Eisenhower Era) will weaken white goy-elites servitude to Jews. Jews want white elites to serve Jews, not to lead and represent the white people. Jews want white elites to be ‘rightist’ or ‘leftist’ but not left-right.
If white elites are totally ‘rightist’(or libertarian, self-centered, and greedy), then they will become like GOP cucks who don’t have the trust or support of white people. What white person respects that turd Paul Ryan who only shills for the Koch Brothers and Israel?
If white elites were totally ‘leftist’, they will be too busy attacking any sign of white success and wealth to forge a unity between white elites and white masses. This is why white ‘socialist’ types just don’t get it. By hating on all vestiges of wealth, they don’t think to forge a unity of white mind and white body. White ‘right’-libertarians can be found in Congress and think-tanks. White ‘left’-socialists can be found in academia and bunch of organizations. Because they lack a sense of racial consciousness(something that existed even in FDR’s time), they judge everything ideologically or just cynically suck up to Power.

In contrast, because Jews do have a strong tribal sense, their leftism and rightism can be shaped to serve something deeper than ideology: Identity. It is Jewish identity that serves as the gravitational pull to their ideological inclinations. Identity is real and concrete. A Jewish people really exist, and they want territory and power; and they have a history. Abstractions must serve something tangible and real. Even with their religion, Jews used the Covenant to partially reverse man’s servitude to God. Without the Covenant, the abstract God is at the center, and Jews must serve Him and His abstract, cosmic, and universal Truth. Since God is the Lord of all that is, Jews would feel compelled to serve OTHER peoples as the children of God. But the Covenant makes God ‘serve’ the Jews as the Chosen People. The Covenant serves as a contract between God and Jews. Jews are to honor and glorify His greatness, and in turn, He is to favor and support the Jews over all other peoples and their gods and cults.
The problem with Christianity is there is no specific covenant between God and Christians. Though Jesus’ promise is considered the New Covenant, it is too universal and pervasive to have a meaningful purpose, at least since the West has spread the Gospel all over the world. When Western Power was limited to Europe, Christianity did serve as a defacto ‘white’ religion, especially as European Christians were at war with mighty Arabs, North Africa, and Turkic Muslims. Back then, Christian Europe was not richer nor more powerful than other parts of the world. There seemed little likelihood that Europe would dominate the world and spread Christianity to other peoples. But as the West did begin to expand and conquer other lands, Christianity gradually transformed from a European/white religion and faith to a universal faith. Thus, it lost the defacto quasi-covenant feature it once had for Europeans. When Jews conquer a people like the Palestinians, the last thing they try to do is convert them to Jewishness. The Covenant is between God and the Jews. It is not to be shared with non-Jews. Thus, the core principles of Jewishness work against Conversion. Even Reform Judaism that allows conversion does so without enthusiasm and with reluctance. It allows conversion but doesn’t encourage it. In contrast, the core principle of Christianity is conversion. After all, Europe itself went from Paganism to Christianity via massive conversion. That Christianity was defacto a European religion for so long was due to an accident of history. Until the rise of modernity, Europe simply didn’t have the means to conquer and dominate other peoples. If anything, it came close to being invaded by others such as Moors, Mongols, and the Turks. But once Europeans gained dominance around the world, the core principle of Christianity awoke in a spectacular way and mass conversions were planned for non-white subjects. Indeed, white Christian masters converted black slaves to Christianity. Despite social differences between whites and blacks, whites were willing to turn blacks into the spiritual equals of whites. And given what Jesus stood for, black slaves were bound to be favored by Christian sentimentality, which explains the rise of Abolitionism driven by religious fury.
In contrast, Jewish slave-owners in the South never dreamed of turning their black slaves into fellow Jews, no more than any Jew in Israel wants to convert Palestinians and Arabs into New Jewish Brothers. For Jews, the Tribe and goyim are different in both body and soul. In contrast, white Christian masters, even as they separated white bodies from black bodies, preached a Gospel that said whites and blacks were at least united in spirit and the love of Christian God and Jesus. This may be seen as the noble element of Christianity, but as the Faith takes in more and more converts from all over the world, its meaning and spirit becomes ever more abstract and confused because they have to cater to just about all peoples whose identities, appearances, customs, histories, values, and group-personalities are so different. And look at the Catholic Church today. It is a hodgepodge of confusion, with a globo-homo cuck-pope presiding over Africans, Asians, and the Third World. As for Mainline Protestantism, what the hell is that nowadays? On the one hand, it’s supposed to be about saving all the world, and yet its main obsession is Homomania that is the darling cult of over-privileged-and-pampered urban elites.

What goes for religion goes for ideology. After all, religions are spiritual ideologies. Unless a faith is connected to something specific and tangible, it grows bigger and bigger. It seems to be growing in power but actually grows diffuse and diluted as it has to appeal to more and more peoples who are so much at odds in tangible matters. This is why even universal-seeming ideologies work best only in specified settings. ‘Thou Shalt Not Kill’ is a good universal principle, but it’s best if Turks enforce it among themselves. We don’t want Turkish police and courts to be responsible to law-and-order all around the world. And I doubt if Turks want the responsibility either. Then, how stupid for the US to be the ‘policeman of the world’. Worse, given that the US is ruled by nasty vicious Jews, its foreign policy is usually that of a gangster even as it pretends to be the defender of ‘human rights’ and ‘liberal democratic’ values in five continents. While it’s good for nations to share ideas and advise other nations against doing evil, most peoples are best off when they mind their own business. It’s like the Sun warms all the planet, but each people use the sunlight to grow food on their land. Solar-based agriculture is a universal practice wherever there is soil, but each nation has its own national farms. Drinking water is also universal, but that doesn’t mean the US should supply water to all the world or that the whole world must come to the US for water. Education is a universal ideal, but each nation has its own obligation to educate their national folks. It’s not up to the US to educate the world. Besides, these days, US academic influence means spreading Homomania, Afromania, and Shoah-Worship to all nations. Outside hard sciences, so much of US academia and media have gotten utterly decadent and corrupt due to Jewish and Homo influence.

Anyway, Big-Tech got to be monopolies by drawing users from the entire spectrum of ideological allegiances. If the intent of Big Tech companies such as Google, Twitter, and Facebook was to rig the algorithm and manipulate results to favor ONE side over another, it should have made known from the beginning. Then, many on the Right would have sought alternative platforms. Indeed, the reason why a social platform site like Gab was a late-comer to the game was because it was unnecessary when Twitter more or less remained true to the principles of Free Speech and allowing views from all sides. Even Andrew Torba surely thought something like Gab would have been pointless a few years ago. Why offer a Free Speech platform when Twitter was being fair and allowing views all across the ideological spectrum? But ever since Donald Trump won, Jewish Wall Street has been tempting Jack Dorsey with investment and higher stock prices IF he would allow Zionist supremacist groups like ADL to monitor for ‘hate’, which means whatever Jewish Supremacists don’t like. The main targets have been those who mock Jewish tyranny, call for white emancipation from Jewish supremacism, and espouse pro-Palestinian causes. Jews even spread the lie that the most effective pro-Trump voices, such as that of ‘Ricky Vaughn’, were Russian agents. At least Joe McCarthy was right about the existence of a vast web of Soviet spies in postwar US government agencies. All this stuff about Russia has been made of whole cloth by Jews who simply cannot stand a fair fight.
Too many Jews act dirty. They fixed baseball games and boxing matches in the past. They use media and money to make sure that US foreign policy is rigged in favor of Zionist supremacist imperialists than of Palestinians who are oppressed, murdered, and terrorized. Jews are without character and principles. Because of their verbal IQ, they are very adept at making themselves sound intellectual and sophisticated, but it’s mostly sophistry,a dirty game of power and control to fool us. The fact is Jews simply cannot stand anything that goes against their own power and agenda. So, the Jewish idea of ‘liberal democracy’ is only one where the masses vote in the way that Jews want. Rule by Jewish oligarchy and elites is ‘liberal democracy’ according to Jews. If the masses vote against Jewish globo-elite wishes, it’s called ‘populism’. According to Jews, people are good only when they obey Jewish elites. Jewish elitism = Liberal Democracy. If the people think on their own and vote for their needs and against Jewish agenda, it’s demeaned as ‘populism’. Jews hate ‘populism’ because it is a call by the goy masses upon goy elites to lead them. Jews want goy elites to serve Jewish-super-elites, just like British or French Imperialists wanted local non-white elites of the empire to serve the Imperial overlords than their own native folks. The imperialists wanted comprador elites than comrade elites. Comprador elites collaborated with the Imperialist overlords whereas the comrade elites sided with the native masses against the imperialists. Today, Jewish globo-homo supremacist elites rule the West, and there is nothing they fear more than the unity of white elites and white masses. Jews think, "How dare those white elites represent and defend their own people than serve us Jewish masters!"

It is time all good Americans denounced the Big Lie of the Big Tech companies. They got to be monopolies because of the participation of everyone, and everyone participated in their services and products because of the understanding that Big Tech companies will be fair and neutral. If Big Tech had made their ideological agenda known from the beginning, they would have missed out on tons of customers and users because countless people would have been outraged and offended by the agenda. Imagine if Twitter got started by having made its ideological biases and pro-Zionist tribal agenda well-known. Then, something like Gab would have been viable as it would have offered a truly Free Speech platform. But Twitter was dishonest. It promoted itself as a Free Speech platform and drew in users from all over the world and all across the ideological spectrum. And with such promise, it became a monopoly. But with its great power and influence(made possible by promise of Free Speech), it is now rigging the system to favor one identity, Jewish supremacism, above all others and favoring globo-homo ideology over other views. According to current Twitter(and Facebook) policy, someone who says that real sex only happens between man and woman is accused of ‘hate speech’ against Homomaniacs who celebrate man-to-man fecal penetration and tranny penis-cutting. We must never criticize perversion and degeneracy, especially the kind favored by Jewish Globalists. Twitter will even allow Jewish-controlled porn that feature white women as sex meat and cumbuckets to be traded and sold by Jewish adult-entertainment industry moguls. But if you’re a decent traditional person or a good Christian who is off-put by homo fecal penetration and say so, you will be suspended and eventually deleted.

Now, if Twitter weren’t a monopoly, it wouldn’t matter. If it was just one among many social platforms offering its kind of services, those banned by Twitter can go to another platform. The problem is Twitter is virtually a monopoly, and it got to be such because of its false promise of Free Speech to all sides. That was why other similarly-conceived companies couldn’t compete with it. What’s the point of creating another Free Speech platform when Twitter was just that? It would have been redundant. And because of its reputation for free speech and neutrality, so many people signed up and made Twitter a total monopoly. If Twitter had been honest about its intentions from the beginning, an alternative platform would have been viable because people would have known from the outset that Twitter is a pro-Zionist, pro-Globo-Homo, anti-white, and anti-Palestinian platform. A company like Gab would have had a chance and would have grown(even bigger than Twitter) if people years ago knew that Twitter would not allow Free Speech. (Of course, Twitter is totally erratic in its regulation of ‘hate speech’. It bans Jared Taylor but allows David Duke, a figure who is far more extreme than Taylor. Why? Precisely because Taylor is an especially intelligent and rational voice on the Right about race, intelligence, and other matters. ADL that gives orders to that pathetic cuck Jack Dorsey simply cannot stand a man like Jared Taylor. ADL would prefer if most people associated White Interests with David Duke who is forever denigrated for his KKK past.
To be sure, Taylor’s one big failure is his loyalty to Jewish Power despite the fact that Jews are his main persecutors. When will Jared Taylor wake up and understand, as does Kevin MacDonald, that it’s hopeless with most Jews. Sure, there will be some Jews who do have principles and will do what’s right. But most Jews have no qualms about playing a dirty game to get what THEY want. Jews developed as merchants whose main objective was profit. They weren’t shaped by the ethos of noblemen who, despite their exploitative nature, had a sense of honor and pride. Jews are essentially fixers than fitters. Not to be trusted. And their influence is deeply corrupting. Their control over the white cuck-elites have turned even people of Northern European stock into pathetic dogs like John McCain and Ben Sasse, gutless and spineless toadies who suck up to Jewish supremacist power but pretend they are helping a poor helpless ‘survivors of the Holocaust’. From a cosmic perspective, it’s all very funny. Unfortunately, we don’t live in cosmic dimensions as gods do but in the human world where we all suffer from the sheer rottenness of the Tribe.