Why the Politically Correct Wokemons are a bunch of Bloodhounds — How 'Liberals' are for PC Uber Alles, therefore should be called Uberalls — Modern Man wants to Feel Free but Not Be Free, and how Jewish Power Exploits this Contradiction

Human Hounds of Woke Mentality: Jews provide them with the 'hate scent' and they go crazy tracking it 24/7.

Politically Correct Wokemons are really just two-legged bloodhounds with mindsets closer to canines than humans. They ain't nothing but hound dogs.

They can’t see, hear, find, or think on their own. They are profoundly uncurious and uncritical. No wonder their minds must be directed by OTHERS who control courses in Critical Theory. Critical Theory fills the mental(and 'spiritual') void of those who can’t be independently critical of anything. They must be TOLD and DIRECTED what to revere and what to revile. They are like dogs whose primary craving is confirmation from the master.

That’s why proglodytes are just a bunch of hound dogs. With no agency and agenda of their own, dogs rely on the master for the scents to track down. Once given a whiff of the scent, they run after it with blind, single-minded obsession. But then, what is the ultimate payoff for this kind of behavior among dogs? Dogs evolved to seek approval from the top/alpha member of the pack, which would be the human master for most dogs. Dogs befriend and play with other dogs but revere and nearly worship the human master as the alpha-god. At the end of the day, bloodhounds want approval from the master for having tracked down the scent. They will go to hell and back in pursuit of the scent to gain approval, which is what really gives 'meaning' to their existence. Likewise, nothing is more satisfying to a wokemon hound than having hunted down ‘bad thought’ and being approved by his/her master, the Tri-Supremacism of Jews, Homos, and Negroes.

Many more people attend college than ever before, but so many of them are on the dumb-side. In a saner world, far fewer people would attend elite institutions. But as colleges now fill up with tons of mediocrities and dummies(made worse by Affirmative Action), there is a much larger pool of morons for radical or Jewish professors to manipulate into states of frenzy. These students certainly can’t think for themselves. They grew up under rootless parents, were weaned on TV & junk culture, and were indoctrinated with PC education. As they can’t really think, they prefer ideological dogma or idol-worship. That way, all they need do is memorize and regurgitate a few catechisms & slogans and wave globo-homo or BLM banner to feel justified and holier-than-thou.

Just like bloodhounds, these sniffers or sniffs rely on others provide them with 'scents' to track down. Then, they chase after Fugitive Thoughts that refuse to be chained to plantation-mentally overgrown with with cotton-picking narratives.
Of course, the wokemon hounds sometimes get out of control, beyond what the master ordered. It’s like over-zealous bloodhounds can become lost in their maniacal drive to find the scent somewhere, anywhere. Likewise, once a wokemon hound is provided with scent of ‘racism’, ‘antisemitism’, or ‘homophobia’, he or she tries to sniff it out of ANYTHING and even begins to hallucinate the 'scent', like outlandishly bogus-KKK-sightings that took place at Oberlin and some other 'liberal' colleges. THAT one ‘scent’ becomes an all-consuming passion. And when he or she thinks it's been tracked down, he or she runs off to the higher authority and says, “LOOK, I FOUND IT”, and expects a pat on the head by the master. Good doggy, and here’s a biscuit. And for some who are so eager for approval and doggy biscuits but have a hard time tracking down the 'scent' in real life, there is always the option of the 'hate hoax' where the evil 'scent' is created out of the thin air.
One key difference between white PC hounds and black-homo-Jewish PC hounds is the former seeks approval from those up on the pedestal(mainly Jews, blacks, & homos), whereas the latter seeks further apologies & adulations from whites for further elevation on the pedestal. So, a white hound makes up a fake 'hate crime' to be petted on the head whereas someone like the Negro-Homo Jussie Smollett makes up a 'hate crime' to be kissed on the ass.

TUCKER CARLSON - HATE CRIME HOAXES ARE REAL AND DO DAMAGE TO SOCIETY!

What whites should do is cleverly toy with the ‘scent’ and make the hounds retrace it to their master. The Jewish master says go after ‘racism’, and the bloodhounds growl and run after whites(especially those who refuse to grovel, roll over, and play fetch). However, if whites label Zionism and Jewish Power as prime examples of ‘racism’ and supremacism, the wokemon bloodhounds may well circle back to their Jewish master. It's no wonder Jews fear and tremble at the mere thought of BDS. It leads the 'scent' right back to the Jews. Jews say, "Sniff this 'scent' of veddy veddy bad 'racism', so be a good dog and go after evil white 'racists'", but BDS says, "Look, Jews are the ones who reek most of 'racism' and supremacism in the Middle East."
Apartheid is too mild a concept(for what is happening in Israel and West Bank) - https://mondoweiss.net/2021/01/apartheid-is-too-mild-a-concept/

As long as Jews are providing anti-white 'scents' to woke hounds to track down fugitive white thoughts, it is utterly useless and retarded for whites say nothing but ‘Muh Israel’. When someone smears a certain scent on you and then provides the scent to dogs to track you down and tear you limb from limb, the last thing you should be doing is pledging undying loyalty, support, and protection to him. You should be clever and smear him with the very scent that he provided to the hounds.

The current wokemonism is all about Dollars & Scents. Jews got the dollars and provide the 'scents' to idiot hounds who can’t think on their own. They must be instructed by others as to what to worship, what to obey, what to hate, what to attack, and etc.
What is a FOOL? A fool is someone who is told two contradictory statements but mindlessly accepts both if only to win approval from the authority and/or out of fear of being ostracized for daring to question the illogic. It’s no wonder so many wokemon fools claim to oppose inequality but have no problem with the supremacism of Jews. Only a fool would believe in BLM, but fools will be fools.

One thing for sure, Jews figured out something about the contradictory way of human nature, and they've used this insight to manipulate and control the minds of the prog masses.

(1) Humans like to think themselves free and independent, speaking truth to power.

(2) Humans, at least most of them, are incapable of independent thought or criticism.

In other words, people(especially those with more education) want to feel free and think themselves a bit rebellious(or 'radical') but, on their own, don't know how to be critical and independent-minded. They are psychologically stuck inside the box. It's like so many would-be-artistic types like themselves as creative but don't know where to start and only lamely copy those precious few with the power of originality. Likewise, while dogs like to run free, they are utterly without sense of direction and purpose unless their master tells them what to hunt, pursue, or track down. Dogs want to run free but need the master to throw the stick for them to run after.

Jews understand and exploit this contradiction of human nature, i.e. that humans want to feel free but don't know how to be free. All said and done, when push comes to shove, people need to be told what to believe, what to cherish, what to reject, what to condemn. This is why true libertarianism repels most people as it requires each and every one of them to be his or her own person with his or her own thoughts and courses of action. It's no wonder that Jean-Paul Sartre, for all his individualist existentialism, ultimately settled for Marxism to lend meaning to his being.

People don't want to think of themselves as servile to authority or conservative(or chained to moribund tradition). They want to believe themselves to be free-spirited and independent-minded. But as most people cannot think or act on their own, they ultimately do lean on an authority to tell them what is what and what-is-to-be-done. The Jewish Trick is to offer that bit of authoritarianism but packaged as 'edgy', 'progressive', 'radical', 'liberating', 'empowering', and 'more evolved'. This way, people can feel free(in being part of something 'radical' and 'progressive') while also having the assurance that a higher authority does all the thinking and planning for them. They get to run free like dogs but in pursuit of sticks thrown by the master watching over them. (The fact that so many 'liberals' are drawn to bureaucracy, hierarchical institutions, and state power is all you need to know. The trick is to pepper the hive with the jive to lend the institution the conceit of inspiration. Hardly surprising that the New Authoritarianism is so closely aligned with hedonism in pop culture.)

It's no wonder that so-called 'liberals' have been easily led around by the nose by Jews who know human nature and mastered the ways of psychological manipulation. People want to feel free but are afraid to be free. It's like an amusement park. People love the 'wild' thrill of the roller coaster ride but only with the secure knowledge that everything is under control. Then, the formula for power is something that makes people feel free without the true burden that comes with real freedom. Turn modernity into something like a movie experience, i.e. all sorts of crazy exciting things happen on the screen but everything is secure and totally under control in the movie theater. Even the most independent-minded character in the Peanuts Comics, Linus Van Pelt, needed to compensate for his freedom of thought with a security blanket. More free you are, more anxious you are because, instead of relying on shared truisms and trust in authority, you feel a need to find your own path to truth, justice, enlightenment, empowerment.

So, what many people really want is authoritarianism packaged as 'liberation'. This way, they won't have to trouble themselves with real thought or course of action, which might be taxing on their minds and create all sorts of doubts and inner-havoc. They want something that flatters them for their 'progressive' and 'liberating' attitudes but really tells them what to believe, what to say, what to praise, what to hate. Most people are like the Cybill Shepherd character in TAXI DRIVER. 'Modern' and 'free' but safely within the confines of 'values', attitudes, and sensibilities established by others. Few people are like Jesus who founded a new church; most just want to belong to the big church, and most 'liberals' belong to the cathedral that tells them what to revere and revile.

And, this is perfectly fine with Jewish Power as Jews want to be the only ones doing the thinking, with most of it premised on "Is it Great for Jews?" As for goyim, let them feel 'free' and 'progressive' while, at the same time, enjoying the 'security' of being told what to believe, what to say, how to act, whom to hate. So, it's Jewish Power Uber Alles, and that means the so-called Liberals are now just a bunch of Uberalls.

The Lost Connective Links of Our Decadent & Degenerate Society — The Only Remaining 'Value' is Nihilism and Blind Worship of Power & Privilege — There is No Moral Core, just Moral Covers — The Lost Ideal of Virginity and the Rise of Whore-Moms

Civilization is turning into a trash heap because the connective links have been lost. Consider the cells in our bodies. Why are we different from single-cell organisms? A single cell organism like an amoeba lives only for itself. In contrast, all the cells in the human body must coordinate together. No cell in the human body can exist or live alone. It only has meaning in relation to all the other cells in the body. A single brain cell is nothing. It only has meaning in relation to other brain cells, and the cells in the brains have meaning in relation to cells in the heart, cells in the lungs, cells in the bloodstream, and cells throughout the nervous system.

Civilization is like a vast organism. Each person has meaning in relation to the larger society. Without such link, his life lacks meaning and larger purpose. What is the difference between a thug/criminal and a soldier? Both commit acts of violence. The difference is the thug uses violence only for self-gain. He is like a lone animal that attacks only to serve itself. In contrast, a soldier fights for the good of the team, the army, the society, nation. Ideally, he fights for a just cause or for the survival of the community. He is willing to sacrifice himself for the good of others with whom he identifies. Even in death, he hangs his hope on the larger community commemorating the heroism of people like himself, and in a sense, something of him lives on as long as the memory is kept alive. It’s like the Toshiro Mifune character in Akira Kurosawa's SEVEN SAMURAI gains larger meaning by using his fighting skills to defend a village of farmers under attack by bandits. He could have been a petty thief serving only himself, but he chose to fight and die for something nobler and worthier. And the thief in KAGEMUSHA gains new meaning through attachment to the Takeda Clan. Prior to his role of service to a higher cause/power, he was just some lone thief with nothing to live or die for except petty interests. It’s like the outlaws in THE WILD BUNCH(by Walon Green and Sam Peckinpah) gain a bit of redemption when they put their lives on the line for the principle of loyalty. Prior to their awakening and resolve, they’d been little more than killers and thieves. So, the difference between thug violence and soldier/policeman violence is the thug only thinks of himself whereas the solider or police officer thinks of the larger community and higher ideals and/or just cause.

Unlike animals that live for brute survival and most primal needs, humans have developed complex morality, values, and organizations. Being part of something bigger, our lives gain meaning in terms of morals, values, duties & obligations, legacy, and posterity. Moral civilization is about posterity, whore culture is about the posterior.
What goes for violence also goes for sex. Sex is animal drive and natural act. But humans are more than animals. Non-black races can be more than savages. So, they have found deeper meaning and purpose in sex. They learned to devise rules and laws to tame and control the biology of sex. Animals don’t know sex leads to new life. They just go into heat and hump one another. Negroes do know sex leads to new life, but Negro men don’t care to take care of their kids. They just want to go around and bang as many ho’s as possible and leave it to OTHERS to raise their kids. (And Cuck Christians and Prog-Whites, by indulging bad black behavior as the White Man's Burden & Blame, encourage more blacks to act nasty and crazy.)

Unlike blacks, the civilized races(at least those who haven't fallen to decadence and degeneracy fueled by demented popular culture) don’t see sex as mere animal horniness or wild debauchery. They see it as a natural drive/process that leads to new life and all the attendant blessings and burdens. Also, sex is seen as part of something bigger: Search for love, courtship, marriage, new life, parenting, acculturation, and etc. So, sex isn’t just for sex but part of something broader, deeper, and more meaningful. Without such mindset, civilization is impossible to create or sustain. Civilization isn’t about petty individuals indulging themselves obliviously to the larger needs of society. It’s about building links between various facets of life and society-as-a-whole to construct and preserve a system of meaning, worth, and higher values. Society links a warrior’s violence with duty, cause, heroism, and sacrifice. Civilization links sexual desire with love, marriage, parenting, children, and posterity. When such links are severed, warriors are reduced to thugs and mercenaries. And sexual desire just turns animal and crude. It is just for the pleasure of the moment. When things fall apart, the morally-minded seek to do the right thing to restore order whereas the nihilistic take advantage of the chaos to do as they please. While some people have an innate sense of morality, others are naturally prone to nihilism. Notice how blacks tend to riot and loot whenever the chance arises. It's almost as if they feel most at home in a savage state-of-nature. And then, there are lots of people who can go either way. They have good in them but also some bad. In the short story RASHOMON, a man finds himself without a purpose in a collapsing world. He teeters between morality and nihilism, finally choosing the latter. As most of us have both good and bad in us, we can go either way, though most whites and Asians will tend toward the good whereas most blacks will choose the bad under trying circumstances.

Matters are all the more dangerous today because the hubris of animal drives is no longer checked(at least immediately) by the nemesis of consequences. By the ruthless laws of nature, a woman who fools around too much will become pregnant or become diseased(and die). Being pregnant, she will have to sober up and take care of the kid. But in modern society, a woman can rely on artificial means of the Pill, condoms, and abortion to free herself of the consequences of her behavior. So, she can act wild and excessive without nature's check on her thoughtlessness. If she gets a disease, she can be treated with antibiotics. And even if she does decide to have the kid, the state will pay for child care and provide her with everything. So, female behavior can get totally out of control, and it’s gone totally nuts in the black community, what with black mothers even raising their kids to 'twerk'. Advanced technology enabled people to act even wilder and more savage than they would in the jungle wild. And this craziness is spreading to white and Asian communities too.

It should be no surprise that Homomania made huge gains in recent times. It is due to the de-linking of the natural drives from morality, culture, and nobler themes of society. There was a time when marriage linked together nature, morality, culture, family, spirituality, and children. But as the links have been cut, there is only the hedonism of the individual. So, everything is judged according to what kind of pleasure it brings to the Individual. So, if vain homo individuals demand their 'happiness' with ‘gay marriage’, then they must be allowed to ‘marry’ too. This is what happens when ‘marriage’ is de-linked from nature, morality, & culture and is, instead, regarded merely as a jolly 'choice' or 'right' of individuals in pursuit of hedonistic ‘happiness’ as vanity and 'pride'.
Worse, a disconnected society will come to favor power and privilege as the highest goods. As nature is no longer restrained, controlled, and guided by morality, integrity, and truth, it runs wild in pursuit of unfettered power and domination. The post-moral West is all about power and money. As Jews have most wealth and influence, they can rewrite the rules and even bring about something like 'gay marriage'. Why not? Jews got the most power, and a nihilistic society worships power. If Jews want it, they get it. (Notice that so-called Conservatives, so worshipful of Jewish Power, did NOTHING to stop Homomania. It's telling that the main donor to the GOP is Sheldon Adelson, the sleazy casino oligarch.) And as homos are the favorite ally of Jews and have plenty of power & privilege themselves, they can do as they like and demand that we follow along. And so many people go along because, deep down inside, the only thing they worship is power and privilege. And why are blacks allowed to do as they please and run wild and act crazy? Because a nihilistic society worships naked displays of power, and so many people in the West now worship Negroes as athletes, rappers, and studs. Just like black college athletes are protected from legal issues for their prowess on the field, the West indulges whatever blacks do because blacks are deemed 'badass' and 'cool'. Of course, Jews, homos, and blacks don't publicly claim to be about nihilism and power-worship. If anything, they make a lot of moral-sounding noises about 'antisemitism', 'racism', and 'homophobia', but their arguments are not true morality but distortions made possible by an excess of power and corruption. Globo-Homomania cannot be true morality. It can be a form of sham-morality only in an utterly degenerate society where the Good is determined not by genuine understanding and conscience but by deceptions & decrees of the ruling class that only really cares for power and privilege. The current US is not about having a moral core; it's about using moral covers to excuse the vile and vicious behaviors of Jews, blacks, and homos. Consider what Jussie Smollett was allowed to get away with, and consider how Google algorithms undermine the search for truth about his 'hate hoax', really a hateful crime against white Americans. And consider how the Media and Academia have made 'pride' nearly synonymous with homosexuality and trannies. Now, I'm sure those into Globo-Homomania sincerely feel themselves to be 'good' and 'moral' people who are all about 'tolerance' and etc., but such delusions only go to show how the Power can distort and deform hearts & minds of people who, under normal conditions of sanity and sobriety, would know better. A society that forces people to say "I love Big Brother" is bad enough. At least those saying it would know they're being forced. But a society where people are made to say "I love Big Brother" with heartfelt sincerity has truly gone over the cliff where decency and integrity are concerned. The existing Power would be such that it can not only force people to say or do the insane and demented but convince them that they are doing something sane and moral, even 'spiritual', what with so many churches being draped with the 'gay rainbow' flag.

So many women are now sexually degenerate, utterly corrupted by the Power that now equates whore-behavior with empowerment. (No wonder the Power used Camille Paglia to push the idolization of the skank.) They no longer see sexual desire as a link in the chain of love, courtship, marriage, family, parenting, children, and posterity. It’s just a Lady Gaga or Lena-Dunham thing where it’s just about momentary orgasms, howling like morons at nightclubs, dancing by sticking their asses to be rubbed by male groins in public, and etc. And there is no shame… or shame has been repressed because Mammon decrees that nothing is more shameful than to feel shame about surrendering to debauchery. Shame the shame and de-link people from the larger themes and meanings of a moral community. Just tell them that what matters most is the individual’s pleasure of the moment.
Or worship whoever has the most money or power. Consider how the current 'leftism' is all about corporate power and wealth. It's about the supposedly 'progressive' support of global corporations that monopolize everything and just get richer and richer. Today's supposed 'leftists' are more likely to champion Mark Zuckerberg and Google oligarchs than Julian Assange or Edward Snowden, the whistleblowers against the power. They are more likely to support oligarchic suppression of free speech that speaks truth to Jewish Power, exposes Globo-Homo degeneracy for what it is, and frankly discusses black problems of crime and mayhem.

Of course, moments pass, and people grow old. And when all their moments were lived only for the moment, they have nothing to call their own. Moments are like bricks. If you can see the bigger picture, you stack each moment like a brick in the building of a house. Over time, all those moments come together to constitute a meaningful house of purpose and memories. But, if you see each brick as just something to toss into the air for the fun of it, all those bricks become strewn and lost, without rhyme or reasons, and there is no house at the end.

The de-linking of natural drives from culture, meaning, morality, and posterity will be the undoing of civilization.

------------------

Ideally, people shouldn’t throw away their virginity on some punk or floozy.
It should be lost with or offered to the right lover/spouse. It used to be the norm that virginity was prized and highly regarded as something precious. It was something you guarded and kept, especially if you were a woman, and finally offered to the one you truly loved.

But then, virginity came to be seen as something like a disease, a plague. It had to be gotten rid of as fast as possible. It was like the cooties.
So, we have teens eager to lose it as fast as possible with someone they don’t even like, often while they're drunk and semi-conscious... just so they can say "I lost it" to their peers who are similarly brainwashed with degenerate Pop Culture. So, some teen guy will roll in the hay with some fat ho’ just to brag that he's now some kind of stud. Or the teen girl will lose it with some half-wit moron and make a fuss about how she lost it.

How did this happen? How did we go FROM a society that prized virginity as something precious that should be offered to the one you love TO a society that regards virginity as social disease, something one should be ashamed of? Pop Culture?

For most of human history — at least outside Negro-verse of wild jungle-bunner behavior in Africa and America — , the ideal was to hold virginity as something special to finally offer to the one you love.

Take the concept of ‘deflowering’. So, the virginal poon was like a pretty flower and it was to be offered for deflowering only to the worthy gardener. But now the only concept is ‘plowing’. A guy will say he met some ho’ and ‘plowed’ her fat arse.

I compare the generation of my friends’ parents and my friends, and there is no comparison. Whether Jewish, Catholic, Protestant, Italian, Asian, Muslim, Hindu, or whatever, the parents all got married, raised families, and grew up. But so many of my friends are immature infantile degenerate tards forever. Also, among my parents generation, it was often the case that their husbands were the first and only man the mothers did it with. There was special bonding and loyalty. But among the daughters, I see a lot of whore behavior. And some of them got ugly tattoos, and they dress like hoors. Now, what kind of mothers will they be to their kids? It will be like kids growing up with prostitute moms. Most of my friends had moms whom they respected. They saw their moms as having been respectable women before they met their hubbies and had kids. But when their daughters become moms, their kids will grow up seeing their tattoo mom-whores as someone who banged tons of guys before they finally settled down with some husband who might not even stick around. It’s all shudder-worthy. What degeneration of society. It’s like the world is becoming Negro-globalized or Neglobalized.