Idolatry Is the Flipside of Bigotry: Consider the Case of the Jews and Blacks - Excessive idolization of one group may lead to blind hatred for whatever groups hated by the idolized group.

 

There are two ways to promote or authorize prejudice, the negative and the positive. The negative way is brutally simple. Pick any group and tar them, defame them, or dehumanize them. It could be a racial group, ethnic entity, religious community, or ideological camp. For example, consider all those Hollywood movies where Arabs/Muslims were rarely little more than Jihadis or terrorists. Present them as a bunch of ‘ragheads’, barely human ‘muzzies’ to mow down when necessary, like in William Friedkin’s adaptation of Jim Webb’s RULES OF ENGAGEMENT. (Webb, who opposed George W. Bush’s Iraq War, should have known better than to produce such a pernicious work, especially because it feigns balance before finally concluding ALL Arabs to be a bunch of towel-head scum deserving to be mowed down from old man to young girl.)
Negative prejudice is, of course, common during war-time, even though current conventions decry overt caricaturing of the enemy, as happened in World War I and World War II: The evil ‘Huns’ depicted as rapacious gorillas or the vicious ‘Japs’ as rabid rodents. Granted, there’s still a lot of fulminating about barbaric Iranians and cruel Russians, but it’s hardly up to the levels of wars of yesteryear(except when depicting ‘white supremacists’).

However, there is another(and more insidious) way to normalize and enforce official prejudice: The excessive positive elevation of a certain group to the point of quasi-idolatry. Why would this be? A mindless promotion of A doesn’t necessarily demean B, C, or D. Just because A is made more popular or special doesn’t mean others are robbed of their basic dignity and rights of humanity.
But this is true only insofar as A has no hostile agendas against B, C, D, E, F, and/or etc. If indeed A does mean harm to, say, B and C, our obsessive devotion to A inevitably blinds us to the interests, rationales, and worthiness of B and C, because all we’d ever want to care about is A-ALL-THE-WAY.

That is why idolizing certain groups is dangerous, indeed far more than certain individuals. We know from celebrity culture that idolatry turns certain figures into ‘stars’, ‘heroes’, and ‘icons’. The fans, who could number in the millions or even hundreds of millions, are so taken with their idols that they often turn a blind eye to the dark side of their demigods or, worse, even justify it as ‘cool’ or ‘badass’.
The dark side of populism was admitted when Donald Trump said that his most devoted followers will vote for him even if he murdered someone in cold blood. So many movie stars, rockers, rappers, and athletes have gotten away with murder(figuratively speaking but literally in some cases) simply because of widespread adoration. Oftentimes, bad behavior, rotten values, and stupid attitudes were normalized simply because many people tend to imitate their ‘heroes’. The weaponization of Taylor Swift was on the assumption that the Swifties will do as their goddess-princess decrees.

Idolization goes way beyond favoring something. Rather, it favors something at the expense of others, even oneself. If Bob, Bill, Peter, Jim, and Nicolas each favor the self, that’d be the most natural thing. Each individual understandably prioritizes what is essential and necessary for himself. There is fairness and balance in each of the men favoring his own interest, of course within the rule of law and principles of fair play.
The problem of idolatry arises when one of the guys, say Jim, is accorded special status and fawned over by the others to the extent that his interests, feelings, and well-being take precedence even over the self among the others. So, Bob, Bill, Peter, and Nicolas will happily sacrifice their own self-interest in order to favor Jim. But it can even get worse if Jim harbors hostility toward, say, Nicolas. Suppose Jim wants Nicholas’ house and car. Bob, Bill, and Peter’s devotion to Jim would be such that they will berate Nicholas for protesting Jim’s hostile moves against him.
Idolizing Jim didn’t necessarily dehumanize the others, but if Jim were to turn hostile against anyone, idolatry translates into a bigotry toward the target of his ire on the logic that, Jim being so awesome, he must always be right, and whatever or whomever he hates must be in the wrong, therefore even worthy of destruction. Thus, idolatry could easily be the flipside of bigotry.

If we expand the example of individuals to ethnic and racial groups in the US, there’s nothing untoward about various groups favoring their own interests. It’s hardly surprising that the Armenian-American community would be more fixated on what goes on in Armenia and its diaspora. Same goes for Greek-Americans, Italian-Americans, Mexican-Americans, Polish-Americans, Burmese-Americans, and etc. Each group favoring its own kind isn’t idolatry but merely natural self-interest. After all, if Irish-Americans don’t prioritize Irishness and their culture and people, who will?

There is a kind of equality and mutuality of respect when each group emphasizes what is most important to its people and culture. Your people respect the other people’s priorities, and vice versa. Your people don’t claim that their interests are first and foremost for the entire country and neither do the peoples of other ethnic groups. The varying interests may be unrelated — it’s doubtful if anything meaning to a Pakistani-American community has any bearing on the Cuban-American community and vice versa — , divergent, or in conflict, but even if tensions arise, there is no danger of idolatry if both contentious groups acknowledge that the entirety of the country doesn’t exist to prioritize one ethnic interests or agendas uber alles. For example, the Turkish-American community and the Greek-American community may not see eye-to-eye on the issue of Cyprus, but both are sensible enough to know that the US doesn’t exist to place Greek or Turkish gripes on the front burner. Thus, both groups lobby for their own ethnic or national interests, as do all the other groups.

But what if one group is elevated to the point of idolatry? Not only does it serve its own interests(like all the others do) but insists upon other groups to shower it with special attention, then favors, then respect, then reverence, then obedience, then worship. Suppose every group is pressed upon to praise and serve this particular group, indeed care more about it than care about itself. While each group’s ethnic interests are to remain mostly a ‘petty’ or ‘private’ affair, the interests of this particularly vaunted group is mandated as a public ritual and spectacle. All must openly profess unconditional support, devotion, and loyalty to this group.
So, while Greek-Americans must go through the usual channels(mostly hidden from view) to pursue their own ethnic interests, their support for this special group must be vocal and visible, loud and unambiguous. In other words, Greek-American interests are merely ‘your business’, but the interests of this special group are ‘OUR BUSINESS’, indeed duty and mission.
Of course, the group we’re talking about is Jewish. The two other groups with similar status(though largely owing to Jewish power of selection and promotion) are the blacks and the homos.

Now, if the specially favored group only craves hugs and kisses, it wouldn’t be so bad. While undue attention showered upon it robs other groups of their own concerns, at least it won’t generate hostility and hatred for other groups. But suppose the special group not only hogs most of the positive attention but insists, indeed demands, that all the other groups direct negative rage against whatever groups it has a vendetta against. Not only must we kiss its feet but we must kick the butts of its designated enemies, even if they’ve done us no harm or harbored ill will towards us. Thus, the idolatry for the special group can easily turn into a kind of bigotry, spawning a whole bunch of Idolatrous-Bigots or Idolots.

Idolatry for the Jews have turned many Americans into idolots, often unsuspectingly so. Whereas bigots are easy to recognize, not so with the idolots whose mindless hatred are usually shrouded in words of love. In the 1980s, plenty of bigoted movies featuring ‘raghead’ Muslim terrorists were common, but such blatant propaganda have fallen out of fashion. Yet, the great majority of Americans, even those who are critical of Israel, still favor Jews/Zionists over Arabs/Muslims. It owes to the continuing idolatry of the Jews.
So, it’s no longer about hating Palestinians, Arabs, or Muslims as natural-born terrorists but emphasizing the Jews as the Holy Holocaust people, the God’s Chosen, the high IQ genius folks, or funny fellas(via comedy). If someone says, “Muzzies suck and let’s nuke them all”, that’s obvious bigotry, and everyone would notice and condemn it(except for some Republicans who hardly batted an eye when Sheldon Adelson said Iran should be nuked). But if someone says, “We love Israel so much, and Jews are so special, and we must do everything for them”, people often forget that such favoring of one group often leads to a policy of dehumanization toward any group that happens to be in the crosshairs of Jewish Power.

So much of the US foreign policy woes can be traced back to Judeolatry. Why did so many Americans become rabidly and virulently hateful toward Russians, Iranians, Syrians, and Palestinians? Why did so many people become anti-white, demeaning any expression of white identity and interests as ‘white supremacist’? Why do so many white people hate themselves, their own race, ethnicity, roots, and culture? More often than not, it’s because they put Judeolatry at the center of their lives. You see, Jews are so great, special, wonderful, wise, and awesome that whatever or whomever Jews denounce(via academia, media, and government) surely deserves all the antipathy that humanity can muster.

This is plainly evident among what still remains of the Christian community in the West, especially America. As Christians, you’d think they care about the well-being of fellow Christians in the Arab World, but they’d rather cheer on the Zionist violence against the Arabs on grounds that Jews are so special that they’re justified even in bombing and slaughtering scores of Christians on the other side of the world. And, if any Christian, white or Arab, draws attention to this madness, he or she is immediately derided as an ‘Anti-Semite’ and ‘canceled’ by the so-called Christian or Conservative community. Consider the time when Christian Arab-Americans called upon Senator Ted Cruz to address the issue of Israel’s attack on Christians in Syria. The cuck-faced turd-maggot of Texas growled and brushed them off as possible ‘Anti-Semites’. Some Christian!

It’s the truth. The main reason why so many Americans hate Russia and Iran is simply sue to Jewish animus, i.e. Russia and Iran are relatively free of World Jewry, at least by the totally cucked standards of the West.
Often, the true rationale for hatred is subconscious because no one wants to admit that he or she is a mental stooge or cuck-puppet of the Jews, but deep in their corrupted hearts is the wish to appease Jews and win their approval. So, as Jews hate Russia, we must hate it too and convince ourselves that the reason why Russia opted for military solution in Ukraine is because barbaric Slavs are hot-blooded, even though it’s more than evident that Russia has been maddeningly patient over the years despite the series of provocations by the Jewish-run West.

Judeolatry always prioritizes Jews among the non-Jews. Thus, a common question is whether one acknowledges that “Israel has a right to exist” while conveniently forgetting or ignoring the fact that Israel was created by denying the right of Palestine’s existence. The positive sympathy bordering on worship for the Jews has turned into contemptuous dismissal of all claims by peoples who were wronged by Jews.
It’s why white so-called ‘conservatives’ always turn a blind eye to those at odds with Israel, characterizing them as ‘terrorists’ or ‘Jew-haters’ simply because they resist the injustice done to them by Jewish Power.

Take Iran and the Jews. Israel has been provoking Iran to no end, even using outright terrorism to murder Iranian scientists, engineers, and diplomats. But, not only do Jewish Zionists at the NYT place quotes around ‘terrorist’(as, when Jews do it, it’s not quite terror) but the pro-Zionist goy idolots always blame Iran despite the slings and arrows hurled at it by World Jewry. If goy idolots watched a Jew strike an Iranian, they’d pretend not to notice. If the Jew then spat on and kicked the Iranian, the goy idolots would look the other way or take sick pleasure in the rightful Jewish Master meting out punishment upon the lowly ‘Muzzie’ slave. But, suppose the Iranian finally had enough and pushed back at the Jew. The goy idolots will predictably scream ‘foul’ and express outrage at such ‘brutality’.
But then, it’s the same dynamic over Jews and whites. Jews attack and defame whites constantly, but most ‘conservatives’ either pretend not to notice or blame the ‘left'(or surreally invoke ‘China’); but then, the minute a white or conservative notices what’s happening and raises the JQ, the ‘conservative’ community goes into hyper-overdrive of howling about ‘Anti-Semitism’.

Consider what Israel’s been doing to Syria and Iran forever. World Jewry and their brownnosing goy puppets pulled every trick in the book to turn Syria into a neo-Medieval ash heap nearly overrun by crazed Jihadis, but Syria was saved at the last minute by Russia and Iran. And for that reason, all Americans are obligated to hate Russia and Iran. (The very people who don’t care about and even cheer on Jews slaughtering Arabs/Muslims will then suddenly say ‘Assad must go’ for ‘gassing’ his people, which turned out to be yet another Jewish lie.) Israel can lob any number of missiles into Syria and use terror on Iran, and the goy idolots will either ignore or defend such transgressions, but the moment Iran strikes back after every last ounce of patience has run dry, the West will throw tantrums about Iranian ‘aggression’.

Likewise, Jews are allowed to spew any amount of abuse at whites, demeaning and defaming them as ‘white supremacists’ and ‘nazis’ and etc. If Palestinians, Arabs, and Iranians who resist World Jewry are ‘terrorists’ and ‘radicals’, whites who want to restore their identity and agency are ‘white supremacists’ or the ‘far right’ even though they harbor no desire to rule the world. Viktor Orban, for example, is deemed as ‘far right’ for the moderate desire to preserve his nation’s people and culture. How dare whites have an identity and agenda independent of the decrees of World Jewry.

Sadly, so many white people, in their blind worship of Jews, have internalized anti-white passions(that sometimes border on pathological hysteria whenever Jews sound the alarm bell of ‘nazi’ or ‘white supremacist’ or ‘far right’). Such white people have been conditioned to believe that whites exist to serve the Other, especially the Jew, because apparently whites serving whites is ‘supremacist’.

Now, if whites insisted not only on whites serving whites but nonwhites serving whites as well(as was the case during the Age of Western Empires), one could raise the issue of ‘white supremacy’. But most whites on the Right believe that every people should guard their own identity, preserve their own culture, and serve their own interests, e.g. whites serving whites, browns serving browns, yellows serving yellows, blacks serving blacks.
If anything, it’s the Jews who insist that all non-Jewish groups prioritize what’s-good-for-Jews over any other consideration. So, if a goy is faced with the choice of doing something that is better for his kind at the expense of Jews and doing something that is better for the Jews at his own kind’s expense, he’s obligated to choose the latter.

It’s no wonder that so many whites do things that are obviously detrimental to their own kind, often on grounds that nothing is worthier than appeasing and pleasing the awesome Jews who, being so smart and special and/or chosen, deserve to have everything on a silver platter.
Indeed, even those who defy World Jewry feel obligated to support Israel or, at the very least, not name the Jew. So, Viktor Orban and other ‘far right’ politicians in Europe support Israel, even though most Jews want to do to their nations what was done to the Palestinians. What is the ‘Great Replacement’ but White Nakba orchestrated by Jews via the migration-invasion of the West by the Third World?
And in the case of Putin and his cohorts, they dare not Name the Power that’s been most instrumental in instigating the war in Ukraine. The world seems unperturbed by countless Ukrainian Slavs having been sacrificed on the battlefield in a conflict that was really about Jews using Ukraine as their gangster headquarters in Europe and as a ramming rod against Russia. When idolatry of a group runs so deep, even its targeted enemies are afraid to spell out the plain truth and expose its evil core.

While Jews are the tops when it comes to idolatry, blacks and homos also enjoy the special group privilege of unconditional adoration and celebration. They are usually discussed in terms of tragic victimhood and/or triumphant victory, and of course, the two modes go together as people tend to feel the most sorrow for the most special. With the Jewish media having elevated homos to angel status, an average American is more likely to be triggered by some homo being called ‘fag’ than about the Zionist-led US dropping bombs and killing civilians in the Middle East. And while we hear about the persecution of homosexuals around the world, what goes undiscussed is the role of homosexuals in the US deep state to further Zionist-US aggression and mass mayhem. Homos are the main co-imperialists alongside the genocidal and supremacist Zionists.

With the worldwide goy fascination with blacks ranging from Michael Jackson to Michael Jordan, it’s easy to understand the appeal of MLK and Mandela(and now even George Floyd). Jews have played on this psychological feature of humanity to promote idolatry of blacks, especially among whites whose submission to Jewry is the indispensable foundation of Zionic hegemony. Jews must sit atop the White Horse that is robbed of agency.

Now, if blacks were mostly nice, Negro-Idolatry or Negrolatry might only have limited impact. It would draw excessive attention to stuff like the Super Bowl, college basketball, or popular entertainment at the expense of other matters, but it wouldn’t break a society.
But, in fact, blacks are the most aggressive, pathological, wild, savage, and destructive race on the planet. They’ve already leveled entire cities(like Detroit) and entire parts of cities in Baltimore, St. Louis, Chicago, Milwaukee, Oakland, and so on. If not for the ‘gibs’ provided by whites(and others) to the blacks in the US, most black communities would soon regress to the state of Haiti or, at best, Jamaica.

Yet, the idolatry of blacks means either turning a blind eye to the victims of blacks or even blaming them(or blaming others for what blacks do). So, even though the idolatry of blacks didn’t begin as hostility or hatred toward other groups, it de facto turns into that very thing because the pro-black idolots(or idolatrous-bigots) are inconvenienced by non-white victimhood that upsets the cart of Negrolatry.
The preponderance of victimhood at the hands of blacks undermines the faith in black wonderfulness, black nobility, black sanctity, black wisdom, and etc.
So, whenever blacks act badly, the Jewish-run media and their cuck consumers pretend the perpetrators are ‘youths’ or ‘lunch-time rowdies’. If a crazed Negro in an SUV rams into white people, blame the car, not the Negro. If Negroes steal too many cars, blame the car company for not making the cars more secure. There was the case of Asian-Americans blaming black-on-yellow violence on ‘white supremacists’ and MAGA. And there’s the Jewish Media’s constant reminder of Emmett Till to convey the message that, regardless of current black crime rates, the problem is all due to past ‘racism’, thereby implicitly justifying black behavior as unfortunate but all-too-understandable rebellion against a ‘systemic racism’.
Thus, the many victims of blacks are thrown under the bus, much like how the victims of Jews are ignored as either nonexistent or deserving of whatever violence meted out to them by Jews or their proxies, usually the shabbos goy US military and NATO.

 Video Link

Perversely enough, blacks sometimes sympathize with Palestinians as fellow victims and vice versa, but what would have made sense in the past no longer does today. When indeed blacks were second-class citizens in the US, one could reasonably draw parallels between the black experience and the Palestinian experience. But today, blacks are venerated in the US, innumerable programs exist to favor less-qualified blacks, tons of money are showered on the black community(much like tons of aid sent to Israel), and furthermore, most blacks in key institutions and industries are happy co-partners and co-imperialists with the US empire. Lloyd Austin, that fat fried-chicken and watermelon munching Negro, is a happy ‘Cogro’, or Co-Imperialist Negro, who is more than happy to do the bidding of Jews, of course alongside the white shabbos goy cucks, in instigating war in Ukraine, raining bombs on the Middle East, occupying one-third of Syria, and supplying Israel with more bombs to mass-slaughter women and children in Gaza and Lebanon. For every prominent Negro who sticks his head out for the Palestinians, ten other Negroes are happy to cheer on Zion and cuck to Jews to serve as Cogros for World Jewry. Most prominent blacks are more like Oprah, Obama, Lloyd Austin, Condolezza Rice, and etc. than Cornel West. And when a Negro like Ta-Nehisi Coates wanders off the plantation and talks about Jewish Evil, most prominent Negroes lend no support because their priority is to preserve their own statuses and privileges as Cogros.

Also, the US, far from being a land where rednecks round-up innocent Negroes and hang them from trees while guzzling moonshine, is now a place where most of the racial violence is black-on-white and black-on-non-white(and of course black-on-black). Thus, comparing blacks with Palestinians is now passe. Blacks in the US today are more like Jewish ‘settlers’ in the West who feel emboldened in attacking Palestinians, terrorizing Arabs, and gobbling up more and more land. Just like black violence led to White Flight(and non-white flight), Jewish-Zionist violence leads to Palestinian flight toward ever dwindling territories in the West Bank. And of course, in current South Africa, blacks act much like Jewish ‘settlers’ in Palestine. They attack white farmers, often murdering them in the cruelest ways. But if blacks at least have the right of indigenousness in South Africa, the Jews doing the terror in the West Bank are relatively recent arrivals from Europe(and America).

Because so many blacks are such ill-behaved louts in a world where so many people are invested in Negrolatry(the false fixation of blacks as holy and noble), the idolatry of blacks can only lead to the bigotry against their victims. We now live in a world that turns a blind eye to the victims of black violence(as if they don’t exist or matter) or berates them if they dare to complain. Either get brutalized and keep your mouth shut or shut the f*** up if you dare to name the problem.
And it’s not just the ‘liberals’. Remember that Mike Johnson, the GOP shabbos goy Congressman, told the country that we must understand and forgive black violence in BLM 2020. Not one word about the victims of black brutality. Predictably, he soon shilled for indiscriminate Jewish-Zionist terror against the Palestinians following Oct 7. You see, both blacks and Jews are so holy and noble that they always have reason to mete out violence to whomever, and we must comply with the way-it-is or cheer on the violence in ‘burn baby burn’ manner. Or pretend it is ‘mostly peaceful protest’. Maybe Jews and cucks will tell us the Gaza Horror is ‘mostly peaceful genocide’.

Many on the ‘Right’ have long assumed that the problem of Political Correctness and its more virulent form, ‘Wokeness’, is the Cult of Equality, but if indeed the new order was about equal justice for all, things would not be so bad because Jews, blacks, and homos would face the same standards. Some draw the distinction between ‘equality’ and ‘equity’, with the former meaning equal opportunity and the latter meaning equality of outcome, but even equity isn’t the main culprit in the current order.
After all, if equity were indeed enforced, the higher institutions would make sure that the various groups of goyim would be equally represented alongside the Jews. Or it could ensure that ‘conservatives’ are just as represented in the academia and media as the ‘liberals’ are. Or that Arab-Americans are given the same voice and representation as the Zionists. But where does anyone see ‘equity’?

No, the central theme of ‘wokeness’ isn’t equality or equity but idolatry of certain groups, mainly Jews, Blacks, and Homos. But then, most ‘right-wing’ types being brown-nosing shabbos goy cucks, they want to pretend otherwise because their strategy of ‘winning’ is always to play the dog to the Jews as masters. “Gee, maybe if we indulge Jewish Power with boundless talent and money, maybe the Tribe will choose us as the top dog.” So, as Glenn Greenwald said, the very ‘conservatives’ who decry censorship in defense of free speech will turn on a dime and call for clamping down on ‘Anti-Semitic’ speech. The very white conzos(conservative-bozos) who bitch and whine about racial preferences and the like will go out and out to demand that Jews and Israel be treated as special and sacred. And in so doing, the peoples, cultures, and nations hated by Jews get no respect.

Ironically, of course, the people most hated by Jews are the White Conservatives themselves, whose only purpose from the Zionist perspective is to serve Israel and fight & die in its wars. The likes of Ben Shapiro and useless cuck Christopher Rufo exist to shepherd the ‘conservative’ movement to uphold ‘colorblind’ values(meaning whites should reject any white identity, agency, and unity) while, at the same time, making an exception for Jews and Israel. In other words, “I see no color but the technicolor of the Jewish dreamcoat.”

https://twitter.com/dr_duchesne/status/1846947229778805209

Nick Fuentes explains how the entire right-wing is fake and controlled
 Video Link

The Remarkable Significance of the Pro-Palestinian Movement in the 21st Century

 

What is the significance of the mass protests since Israel’s bombardment and invasion of Gaza following the Hamas strike on October 7, 2023? A truly unprecedented development, the answer is bound to be multifaceted. One is the blow to the idolatry of victimhood, a kind of eternalization of historical tragedy seeking to permanently seal a certain group’s identity with a particular event or prolonged(but far from unending and/or continuous) condition.
The mental habit may have origins with the Christians who made a grand fetishization of victimhood/suffering and permanently affixed their faith and community with the suffering of Jesus Christ and the Early Christians. In other words, because the Romans fed the Early Christians to the lions, Christians get to accrue forever interests on noble victimhood regardless of their aggressions, violence, and hypocrisies through the ages.

Over time, it became a kind of passive/aggressive strategy(not always conscious) in dealing with the outside world(and ‘heretical’ sects of Christians). It became a de facto ploy of European Imperialism whereby, oftentimes, the Christian missionaries were among the first ones to make contact with the Other, only to be misunderstood, persecuted, and even killed by the natives. Thus, the Christian West earned Sacred Victim points via the ‘passive’ sacrifices of the missionaries and cashed them in as moral justification to conquer and quell the infidels. “We tried to spread love and faith to your darkies, but you slayed our missionaries with vicious cruelty, thereby leaving us no choice but to set things right by the might of arms.” Send in the missionaries, create saint-martyrs, bleat sanctimoniously about their sacrifice, and then invoke God and Country to wreak vengeance and spread the ‘civilization’.

Still, one saving grace of Christianity, for all its hypocrisies, was the commitment, at least in theory and ideal, to be as hard on oneself and one’s own people(if not more so) as on the Other. After all, whereas the benighted heathens may not have known better in their spiritual darkness, the Christians who’ve accepted the blessings of Jesus the loving and compassionate God should have known better and expected more of themselves.
Then, it’s no wonder that, along with the violence and hypocrisy, there were genuine efforts in the Christian West toward social and political reforms based on Christian moral precepts.
Also, one useful quality about hypocrisy is it could be pointed to reveal the hypocrisy of those who preach one thing but practice something else. One might say a hypocritical Christian was less dangerous than a consistent Nazi ideologue, Roman soldier, or Mongol barbarian who honestly acknowledged he was invading to conquer, exterminate, and enslave, and that was that. You can’t fault them for hypocrisy as they practiced exactly what they preached.

Christians exploited past suffering to sanctify their present and future, but in their emphasis on victimization and suffering, they were confronted with their own transgressions or trespasses against others. Thus, being a Christian didn’t mean you only got to cry victim; it also meant you had to face up to your own potential for evil unto others.
Indeed, a Christian who wraps himself in the banner of Jesus, endlessly bleats ‘Christ Is King’, and acts as if he or his people have nothing to answer for is a pretty useless Christian. (Even more useless are American Christians who really worship the Mammon of power and wealth, which explains why they currently worship Jews above God and Jesus and cackle with hideous glee at the sight of Gazans being butchered by the almighty IDF. Such types have proven that faith in Christianity is no guarantee for moral rectitude. At the other end, you have those insufferable holier-than-thou types who relish wallowing in guilt as a kind of exhibitionism. “Just look at me kiss a Negro’s feet, boo hoo hoo.”)

If there has been a degree of self-reflection among Christians, such has been mostly absent among the three groups that have recently staked claims of permanent tragicism or eternal victimhood. They are Jews, blacks, and homos. It wasn’t always so, however.
Post-Holocaust Jews, while hardly critical of Jewish behavior, did believe that Jews, given their own history of suffering, should be more conscientious and compassionate about other groups who’ve experienced similar tragedies or face horrors of the now. It partly explains why many Jews took up the cause of Civil Rights for blacks, pushed for revisionism on the American Indians, and protested the Vietnam War where American militarism was embroiled in neo-imperialist destruction.
And the appeal of Michael King(aka Martin L. King) to many whites was the message of reconciliation and understanding, a call to peace as a means to settle the racial divide in America. And before him, plenty of black leaders were critical of blacks and mindful of bettering themselves to show their worthiness of being fully accepted into American Society.

However, Jews and blacks by and large proved to be not as self-reflective as the White Christians. The reasons could be genetic, cultural, historical, and/or political. Blacks, being wilder and more childlike, tend to lack empathy and instead view the world in terms of ‘gots to have me’. Jews being of pushier temperament and wilier mindset, tend toward egocentrism, tribalism, or ‘advantagism’.
But aside from genetic and cultural traits, their victim mentality is more ingrained due to prolonged historical conditions. As far as blacks are concerned, at least up to the Sixties, they lived under the white yoke since their forced arrival on American shores as slaves. Their entire memory is that of having been on the bottom. Likewise, the entirety of Jewish existence in the West until relatively recently was under white/Christian power. Thus, Jews always felt their lot was precarious, never certain. Even when times were good, there was always the chance that the winds of fortune may blow the other way, and they’d lose it all or be expelled yet once again. And even privileged Jews felt surrounded by goyim who muttered about ‘Christ Killers’ and ‘stingy Jews’.

In either case, their condition didn’t mean that blacks or Jews were all saints — as surely there were plenty of rotten ones among them as among all other races and tribes — , but it did mean that, saint or sinner, they all lived under the power of another people consistently for a long long time. Unlike Jews in Judea who were sometimes victors and sometimes losers, the Jewish diaspora were always at the mercy of bigger powers. Likewise, blacks felt that they were just a bunch of ‘niggers’ to white people who held almost all the power through most of US history(and American History was the only history that blacks in the US knew).

But the victimhood mentality among Jews and blacks may have grown out of proportion due to the Northern European Protestant factor, the reasons being twofold. (1) Northern Europeans reached the summit of world power, even to the point of feeling invincible, thus allowing them to relax a bit and take their might for granted. Thus, they felt they could afford to be more generous, redemptive, and magnanimous. In contrast, such feelings hardly existed in Southern Europe and Eastern Europe that never felt as powerful or secure; excessive moralism or generosity for the Other was out of the question. Even in the US itself, the richer and more advanced northern elites tended toward greater generosity and moral concern than the poorer and less secure whites in the South who thought more in terms of protection and survival, especially from the wild Negroes. Morality in the South emphasized duty to God and one’s place in the order, not to change society for the betterment of all. It was much the same in Latin America where white minorities ruled over the darker populations of browns and/or blacks.
(2) Protestantism made Northern Europeans more personally and individually conscious of their moral choices than leaving it up to an institution to offer them instructions on what’s what. Thereby, whereas doing good work in the Catholic South was a matter of taking cues from above, in the Protestant North it meant taking one’s own initiative and accepting one’s own accountability to improve the world. Perhaps, Northern Europeans, having evolved in colder climes, were more earnest by nature as well. Compare Robert Redford with Joe Pesci. In a way, Martin Scorsese’s films exhibit a kind of Catholic Envy of Protestantism. Despite having remained a Catholic, a film like MEAN STREETS pulsates with Martin-Lutherian impulses of protest against Church teachings. Its (anti)hero Charlie wants to seek ‘redemption’ his own way, find ‘salvation’ in the streets among the hoodlums and the hoors. Anyway, Jews and blacks could have taken Northern Protestant moralism two ways. Adopt it themselves and shape their own morality in a similar manner OR take advantage of White Guilt to favor their own racial or ethnic power; in other words, use the Northern Protestants for the suckers that they could easily be. Needless to say, they opted for the latter.

In a way, the predominance of the Jewish and black victimology makes sense within the American context. The black one is obvious as blacks were imported as slaves and largely lived under bondage until the end of the Civil War; and then, blacks continued to face various legal and social discriminations on racial grounds in a country founded on the principle of equal justice. Not only was it a struggle for blacks to overcome the various obstacles but it was a challenge for whites to overcome their own prejudices. The challenges were difficult but also bracing and redemptive for many whites who, through the black narrative, hoped that a better version of America would emerge with the eventual fulfillment of its founding principles of the republic.

The other great noble victim narrative involved the American Indians, but it never quite caught on like the one involving blacks. Unlike blacks who arrived in chains to serve as slaves, thus were always under white rule, American Indians were free-roaming warriors who fought the white settlers in bloody clashes. Though doomed in numbers and by technology, the frontier war narratives portrayed them as fearsome braves who met a tragic end(like the Japanese in World War II) than as bona fide ‘victim’ groups. (Of course, blacks were fearsome tribal warriors in the Dark Continent as well, but as they arrived on American shores subdued in chains, they were always regarded as little more than slaves, a people completely at the mercy of whites.)

Furthermore, whereas black populations exploded and increasingly poured into influential urban centers(eventually in the North and the West), American Indians faded away in sparsely populated areas of the country, the so-called ‘reservations’. And their stony and stoic demeanor didn’t do much for their expression as a community.
And with the popularization of the American Western, it once again became fashionable to depict Indians as Red Savages who had to be rubbed out to make the West a nice decent place for Christian womenfolk and children. Also, for all their legendary prowess as natural warriors and hunters, American Indians hardly turned out to be more athletic than the white man. In contrast, whites would become virtually addicted to the siren song of black sports and music.

If black victimology in the US is understandable given the history, the primacy of Jewish victimology needs some explaining. After all, so-called ‘antisemitism’ in the US was relatively mild compared to what prevailed in Europe, especially parts of Eastern Europe. (Granted, even the slightest hint of ‘antisemitism’ is now regarded as an unpardonable sin, somewhat akin to blasphemy against God in the Middle Ages or using the Lord’s name in vain; but then, if anything has the status of godliness in our times, it is Jewishness, largely thanks to Jewish control of academia, media, and finance. Thus, the slightest infraction against Jewishness is deemed infinitely worse than the most bilious invectives against, say, Russians, Iranians, Chinese, Whites, Christians, Arabs, and etc. In other words, a society where Jews have it all but may hear the epithet ‘kike’ on occasion is more alarming than a society where whites/Christians or certain other goyim come under a constant barrage of ideological and racial abuse, not least from none other than Jewish Power.)

Jewish American historiography is rife with narratives about ancestors fleeing from pogroms in the Pale of Settlement(then a part of the Russian Empire) and coming to Edenic America to find hope, freedom, and opportunity. And the great Jewish calamity of the 20th century, the Shoah or Holocaust, didn’t happen in the US but across the Atlantic, and the US expended a great deal of material and human resources in the defeat of Nazi Germany. As horrible as the Shoah was, it happened in Europe, and there is no reason for Americans to make it a centerpiece of collective consciousness. If Americans really want to wax tragic about its own guilt of ‘genocide’, they should fixate on the fate of the American Indians or the millions of victims of American Wars(especially in East Asia and the Middle East). When something close to genocide is happening now in Gaza at the hands of the Likud(ation) government of Israel fully backed by the US, now there is something Americans can get all weepy over.

And yet, the majority support for Israel(that is carrying out mass slaughter), far eclipsing any concern for the Palestinian bodies piling up in Gaza, offers a clear indication as to why Jewish Victimology has become so central to American values and mythos. All said and done, when push comes to shove, the great majority of White Americans are shallow, brown-nosing, and sycophantic dweebs looking to gain approval and status by sucking up to the richest and most powerful people. As Jews are by far the wealthiest and most influential group, whites are naturally most servile to them. But then, Jews don’t want to be seen as the most powerful group being feted by a bunch of toadies, sidekicks, and whores. And whites don’t want to be seen as what they really are: brown-nosing cuck-maggots.
And so, the Jewish Victimology turns out to be convenient for both sides. Via the Holocaust Cult, we can keep pretending that Jews are forever the Holy Holocaust People always being hounded by new specters of ‘antisemitism’. Thus, even though cuck-goyim suck up to Jews for shekels, approval, favors, and status, there’s the pretense that it’s all about protecting poor helpless Jews. So, never mind the fact that Jewish Power is built on bribery, blackmail, and gangsterism. Never mind that most white Americans(especially in government and Christian Zionist churches) have the mentality of dogs(at least in relation to Jews). Jewish Victimology allows whites to pretend that they are noble white knights coming to the rescue of a much beleaguered people who are yet once being threatened by new manifestations of ‘nazism’.

Given the kind of lock that Jewish Power has on the American Psyche, many in the dissident sphere came to despair of the pathetic state of affairs in the general discourse, political and moral. Just about everything Americans seem to obsess about in periodic outbursts of moral panic seems to be the brainchild of Jewish Power. Jews push the button, and the machine does as programmed. It’s as if the American Mind is a putty in Jewish Hands. Whether it’s ‘feminist’ panic about ‘date rape’ at white fraternities, ‘hate crime’ hoaxes, yet another iteration of ‘innocent’ or ‘gentle’ black child killed by whites/cops, the supposed persecution of saintly homosexuals or ‘trans-genocide’, Assad gassing his own people, Putin as New Hitler threatening ‘democratic’ Ukraine, the rise of the ‘far right’ and ‘white supremacism’, or ‘systemic racist’ police mowing down random black men in the streets, and etc., it’s difficult to conceive of any victim narrative around the world independent of Jewish-controlled narratives and agendas. It’s as if Jews gained the monopoly on licensing victimology, without whose validation, one’s suffering amounts to a plate of beans(in the eyes of the ‘free world’ or ‘rules-based order’), whereas even a non-event like the death of George Floyd(who most certainly died of self-induced fentanyl poisoning) could be blown up into the greatest tragedy since the crucifixion of Jesus H. Christ.
The fact that so many Americans keep falling for such nonsense time and time again indicates that Americans are infantile, close to retarded, trashy and shallow, beyond help.

Then, what a surprise that an outpouring of support for the Palestinians exploded upon the scene as a great black swan moral event. How and why did this happen? What are the lessons to be learned from this? Is it a culmination of certain long suppressed trends or the beginning of something that is likely to grow bigger in the future?
One thing for sure, this happened outside the purview and permission of Jewish Power, which, if anything, had been doing everything in its power to prevent something like it, not least in the suppression of the BDS movement. To be sure, Jewish activists did play a key role in pro-Palestinian movement, much like conscientious whites played a significant role in the Civil Rights Movement. But these dissident Jews never had the kind of power that Zion Inc. had built up over the years. Norman Finkelstein admitted that he’d pretty much given up on the movement that hardly went anywhere as the pro-Zionist wing of the Jewish Community seemed so invincible and pervasive at all levels of society. It took him by surprise that the movement exploded into the street and sprouted all over campuses, leading media outlets that had previously ignored him to suddenly appeal to him for analysis and commentary.
It’s all the more remarkable given that the current controversy began on Oct 7, 2023 when IDF bases were overrun by Hamas fighters, initially lending Israel the moral advantage as the aggrieved and victimized party. And of course, to this day, there are plenty of US politicians and religious figures who invoke Oct 7 to justify whatever Israel has done since, much like Americans felt justified in everything they did in World War II following Pearl Harbor.
But when bombs began to rain down on Gaza and indiscriminately blow things up, the political shift was dramatic.

One thing for sure, the outpouring of sympathy for the Palestinians was not manufactured, making it all the more remarkable. Just about every political agenda or mass passion has been astro-turfed for as long as we can remember. Think of WMD in Iraq or War on Terror. Think of GloboHomo pushed by Hollywood and the courts. Or the ‘date rape’ panic that always focused on White Fratboys. Or the #MeToo hysteria. And of course, Trump as ‘literally Hitler’, Russia Collusion mass paranoia, Covid mania, and BLM-George-Floyd riots. And if anyone paid attention to the idiocy known as ‘American Conservatism’, the biggest alarm bells were about the monopolization of power by the ‘far left’, which would include BlackRock and other super-capitalist oligarchs, LOL. All these political and/or moral panics were manufactured by certain elements of the elites, be they ensconced in government, academia, media, entertainment, or law firms.

But the Pro-Palestinian movement was different. If anything, the elites of both parties have been targeting BDS for destruction. Whether it was Nancy Pelosi or Donald Trump, American Politics has mostly been about the biggest names in government rolling over at the feet of Netanyahu and the like.
Yet, out of the left field, Pro-Palestinian voices exploded on the scene. Even more remarkably, it happened during Biden’s presidency. The mass outrage of BLM in 2020 could be explained as the Deep State’s coordinated effort to delegitimize Trump’s MAGA-America, one of white supremacism where cops went around hunting down innocent and angelic blacks. Indeed, the Democratic elites(and even some ‘RINO’ ones) poured gasoline on the social unrest, aka ‘mostly peaceful protests’, and the overwhelmingly Jewish-Democratic media played along.

In contrast, the pro-Palestinian protests were bound to hurt the Democrats by exposing them as just as bloodthirsty as the GOP on Zionist issues and just as servile to AIPAC. Thus, one cannot chalk up the angry protests to political opportunism. If anything, many protesters were soon targeted for blacklisting on future job prospects(and some heads rolled in elite academia for having defended the free speech of the protesters). As such, this was possibly the most authentic movement since the Anti-War movement of the Sixties.

Palestinian-Americans have miniscule power and influence compared to the Jewish-Zionists(and their cuck-n-proxy goy allies), so how did this happen? One explanation is Palestinian-Americans(and Arab/Muslim-Americans in general) invested much of their energies on impacting(if not dominating) a key department in academia: Middle East Studies. Unlike conservatives who’ve failed to consolidate control over any single department and whose influence is diffuse across academia, Arab-Americans have worked hard at gaining significant representation in Middle East Studies, a key field considering America’s imperial foreign policy that has often targeted that region of the world.
Thus, even though Palestinian/Arab/Muslim Americans have limited power and influence in most sectors, they’ve amassed considerable intellectual/moral arsenal in at least one area of expertise. And even though these individuals are usually ignored by the Jewish-dominated ‘mainstream media’ or MSM, they’ve gained a considerable following through social media. Over time, growing numbers of young people grew up listening to both sides instead of merely the Jewish-Zionist-oriented one.

But there is also the Jewish Factor as many American Jews, especially of the younger generation, have grown disgusted with Israel’s turn to far-right extremism as embodied by Netanyahu and his allies(who have majority support among the Israelis). Ironically, mega-Zionist Trump and MAGA may have hastened Jewish-American disillusionment with Israel and Zionism, indeed far more than the wars of George W. Bush.
While some on the (dissident) Right appreciated Trump for standing up to the Neocons and their Wars for Israel, some Jews and influential people on the Left grew even more hostile to Israel when the Trump-Netanyahu pact emboldened Israelis to act even more aggressively and arrogantly in the region. Jewish Power vilified Trump as a white supremacist, hate-monger, xenophobe, literally Hitler, Neo-Nazi, and etc. but there was Netanyahu shaking hands with Trump who gave the green light for Israel to annex more territory and beat up on Palestinians. If Trump is ‘literally Hitler’ and if Israelis prefer him as the leader of America, it implies Israel is a kind of ‘nazi state’.

One thing for sure, if the Pro-Palestinian movement has one decisive advantage over the Alt Right, especially in its incarnation during 2016-2017, it was the themes of nationalism and humanism, as opposed to supremacism and neo-imperialism. While plenty(and probably most) of Alt Right types rejected supremacism and imperialism, the movement got hijacked by Richard Spencer, a neo-imperialist who merely wanted to replace Jewish Supremacist World Hegemony with Anglo-White one. As such, he tended to encourage stuff like Heil-Gate and form alliances with Neo-Nazi types like Mike Enoch, Chris Cantwell, and etc. As such, it was easy for Jews and globalists to paint the Hitler mustache on the Alt Right. A lost opportunity for the Dissident Right. Never let a child lead a movement. Spencer is a spoiled brat.

In contrast, the pro-Palestinian voices merely want the world to recognize the humanity of the Palestinians. Also, unlike 007-Darth-Vader-wanna-be Richard Spencer and other such ilk who speak in global hegemonic or ‘Jupiterian’ terms, pro-Palestinians only demand a rightful homeland for Palestinians in the land of their ancestors.
In the US, Jewish Power is actually against equal justice for all peoples and nations. Rather, it insists on special affinity and favoritism for Israel, meaning those at odds with the Zionist agenda must be relegated to enemy-or-less-than-human status. Far from pushing the American System to treat Jews and Palestinians equally(here and abroad), Jewish Power demands that the US always favor Jews and Zion. Jews, blacks, and homos are the holy trinity deserving of ‘more equal than others’ status. Jews slaughtering tens of thousands of Palestinian women and children is no big deal. But Palestinians calling for their own homeland is twisted into ‘calling for the genocide of Jews’.

There seems to be an overlapping if not a convergence of rightist and leftist strands in regards to the increasingly abusive and corrupt Jewish Power. Many on the Right feel that Jewish-Zionist-centric Neoconservatism is antithetic to American Interests. As the nationalist fervor following 9/11(with its own questionable narrative) fizzled in the morass of the Iraq War(built on a lie that no one could long sustain), the mainstream of the American Right turned against interventionism, which explained the popularity of Donald Trump’s foreign policy platform in 2016(to the chagrin of Jewish Neocons who wanted to keep milking American blood for Jewish Supremacist Wars).
Even though the American Left was slower to coalesce into a viable opposition against the establishment, it’s likely that many came to a similar realization as the so-called nationalist-populists on the American Right. Neolibs of the Democratic Party are merely the flipside of the Neocons of the GOP, and most Democratic elites have done little but shill for Zion.

A key difference is this: Whereas many anti-Neocon conservatives don’t care enough about the issue to meet up in fiery rallies — it’s more apathy about Israel First than outright antipathy toward Zionism — , many on the Left, especially the young, relish the romance of protest and activism(and are furthermore concentrated in urban areas whereas the rhetoric and action become most heated). Thus, they are situated to make a bigger impact on the political direction of the country.