Middle America must become Middle Finger America — Finalize the Divorce between Upper America and Middle America — Jewish End of ‘Iconarrativity’ — The Associative Power of ‘Adeology’ over Ideology — The Virtue of Nationalism and Race-ism — The Myth of Liberal Democracy must be Exploded — White Elite Privilege, not White Privilege — Need for Left-Right

Problem is Middle America is exactly what it is: Middle America. The Middle doesn't decide policy. The Top does. Top America has the power and apparatus to rule. It's like the mind controls the body. The middle body, or torso, doesn't control the mind. Sure, if the torso is in pain, it sends signals to the mind to do something about it. When Top America was white, the brain centers had nerve connections to Middle America, the midsection of America.
But Top America is now Jewish, and its nerve connections are with fellow Jews around the world and in Israel. Jewish brain centers sense little of the pain felt by Middle White America. When Middle(and Lower) White America sends signals to the Top about its pains and problems, the Top America says, "Here, take these pain-killing opioids and just die off to increase profits for Big Pharma. Die sooner than later because your ilk need to be replaced by non-whites who collaborate with Jewish Elites who let them in."

Even in the Top or Upper America, most people only wield or serve power. They don't get to decide or shape the direction of power. Military generals, even at uppermost ranks, don't choose which wars to fight or which nations to destroy. They are just in it for status and prestige. They do as told by people above them. The President is supposed to be Commander-in-Chief, but, based on a honest assessment of Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, Barack Obama, and even Donald Trump, it's obvious that the president is hemmed in by all sides by a greater power of Deep State networking dominated by the ethno-monopoly of Jewish Power. Congress is a parliament of whores that serves its donors than represents the people who elected its members. Jewish donations to Dems is 50 to 60%. Jewish donations to GOP is 25%. That ought to tell us who owns Congress. As Jews also control the media, they can use disinformation and propaganda to attack and smear politicians they don't like. Needless to say, all politicians are deathly afraid of AIPAC and big media. Also, as Jews and their cuck-puppets control top law firms and the courts, they can choose whom to go after. As every businessman, 'leader', or politician is corrupt and has skeletons in his closet, anyone can be brought down by Jewish Power, especially with its vast apparatus of collecting dirt on anyone for blackmail or prosecution. Notice how the Power went after Blagojevich but protected Obama, just another corrupt puppy. Jews are angry with Trump because his success owed much to Jewish protection in NY. Dig into Trump's past, and his dirt is inseparable from all the Jewish dirt in NY. Trump sure didn't work with David Duke or KKK to fleece so many people and pull all sorts of dirty tricks. Even the 'Russians' he had relations with in the past were Jews. So, when he spoke of America First and ran on Populism, Jewish rage knew no bounds and was determined to Truman-Show him from all sides: Keep him stuck in the Deep State Bubble. Trump-Man-Show is Truman Show as real-reality-TV.

Furthermore, Jews control media and academia; therefore, most elites in Deep State have been indoctrinated with Judeo-centric worldview, cult of 'white guilt', Magic Negro revelry(designed to turn whites into moral and sexual cucks), and globohomo neo-religion. While most people in Deep State are higher IQ, they lack individuality and integrity. They are mainly about status, prestige, and the pride of being part of the 'best and brightest'. Their priority is to say and do anything to belong to the Club. So, they just play along with the dominant Script that has already been written for them. Granted, there is sometimes an agenda-lag between the shapers of power and wielders of power. We saw this with the matter of 'gays in military'. As the US military had been against homosexuality for so long, the wielders of power in the military resisted the new pro-homo decree from above. But over time, the wielders of power eventually caught up to the demands of the shapers of power who have control of Narrative and Iconography that decide the collective values and passions of a people. Today, the wielders of power in the military are the most fervent pushers of globohomo-mania and invoke it with pride as a moral pillar of US hegemony: US must rule because it is 'most evolved' in globo-homo worship and tranny men competing in women's sports. (In New America, women should get blown up in combat, babies should be killed even at the point of birth, and men-with-wigs should beat up women in sports.)

Middle America only has voting power. The real power is decided by Top America. Upper America or Uppermost America controls the media, law firms, courts, finance, entertainment, intelligence services, organized crime(that works with powerful people), Pentagon, academia, and etc. They are the ones in the corridors of power, the backrooms where deals happen, the news centers & propaganda wings, the law courts, and etc. And these people feel contempt for dumb and mediocre Middle America, all the more so because goy-despising Jews are at the very top and because the new ideology is Diversity. Middle America is seen as 'too white', in need of enrichment by non-white foreigners as New Americans. Indeed, the US doesn't even deserve to build walls to keep out Caravan illegals who are blatantly trespassing into the US. These massive movements of Caravandals cannot be spontaneous. Such huge movements of peoples have to be organized and coordinated, just like the mass demographic invasions of EU from Middle East and Africa. Jewish Globalists could well be behind it, and it is a powerful way to demonstrate Who-has-the-real-power to Trump and his naive supporters. Globalists organize 'caravans' of illegals to storm America from the outside, and Jewish globalists on the inside use their control of courts, media, and cuck-politicians to tie Trump's hands from doing anything about it. It's as if Jews pulled down Trump's pants and snapped a mousetrap on his penis for all the world to see... yet, the ONLY thing he can do is sign the anti-wall bill, impotently declare emergency(that won't do anything as it will be blocked by an army of Jewish lawyers and goy cucks), and sing more hosannas to Israel. Jews are laughing at him and his followers who, no matter how insulted and humiliated, still praise Jews and Israel. Jews prize Diversity as a wedge to divide America so that goyim of many colors won't be able to unite against Jewish globo-homo power.

The failure of American Conservatives is partly due to insufficient interest in ideas, arts, culture, and world affairs. Such lack of curiosity meant Conservatives had little chance of taking over elite centers of information, social sciences, arts, entertainment, and etc. While many conservatives did succeed in engineering and business, the problem is such fields are essentially non-ideological or non-higher-inspirational. Business is about aspiration, and it's good to have lots of money. But meaning doesn't come from money itself but from the 'higher' purpose it serves. This is why Bill Gates tries to win respect and admiration by pouring billions into his 'save the world' projects. Where does Bill Gates get his ideas and values? Media and Academia. Finance is about making money, and engineering is about building and running things. They are value-free. People seek values from ideas and idols, from history books, movies, TV shows, narratives, and etc. As Jews and Liberals have shown far more interest in such fields, they came to control the ideas and idols.

Francis Fukuyama spoke of the End of History(meaning End of History of Ideas), what with Liberal Democracy being the ultimate goal and universal good for all mankind for all time. Jews didn't exactly see it that way. If Fukuyama focused on the blank slate of liberal democracy itself as the ultimate good, Jews concentrated on what they could write on the slate to turn liberal democracy into a tribal oligarchy. After all, EVEN IF liberal democracy may be the best form of governance, the fact remains that it is generic & bland, lacking a will and drive of its own. Jews thought less in terms of 'triumph of liberal democracy' than of 'triumph of Jewish Power by means of liberal democracy'(even if Jews had to resort to illiberal means like PC to suppress liberal principles and values, such as free speech, freedom of conscience, and equal justice; I wonder if Fukuyama thinks the Anti-BDS law passed by the Senate is in tune with Liberal Democracy? So much for equal justice and freedom of conscience. Also, if the US is really a liberal democracy, how come Fukuyama and other academics are SO AFRAID and TIMID about broaching the topic of Jewish Power and Zionist imperialism over West Bank? Or about what Jewish Power did to Russia economically in the 1990s? Fukuyama talks a lot of shi* about big bad Putin and how corrupt the Russians are, but he's utterly silent about Jewish role in the Shock Doctrine.) Jews were less interested in the End of History(of ideas) than in the End of Iconography and 'Narrativity' or 'Iconarrativity'. Jews understood that the groups favored by the 'Narrativity' and Iconography would get to dominate and control Liberal Democracy. Even in a liberal democracy, some people are bound to be more equal than others. Why would they be 'more equal'? Because they are favored by the prevailing narrative and official iconography. Who controls the narrative? The academia that feeds ideas and histories to the media. Who controls the iconography? The media and entertainment. So, Jews were less interested in the End of History than in how they could 'end'(or finalize or complete) the Iconography and Narrative(or Iconarrative) in their favor so that they could gain permanent power. Both Christianity and Islam sought to 'end' the 'Iconarrativity' for all future history. Christianity said the Final Truth for all time was revealed by Jesus. So, across the centuries, Christian powers patronized artists to create Christian icons extolling Jesus' divinity and memorializing His Crucifixion. The West did this generation after generation over 1500 yrs. And the Gospels were read and preached endlessly as the Final Revelation for mankind(that is unless Jesus decides to return). Muslims did the same with Muhammad, though in some ways, Islam was less effective because it presented a Final Narrative but no Iconography. As Muhammad as the Final Prophet could not be represented as an icon(such would have been wicked idolatry), there was only the Word of the Prophet and the Wail of the faithful. Christianity was a picture book with both words and pictures. Islam was just a book of words, mostly narrative and far less iconography.

Anyway, Jews decided to define the End of Iconarrativity in the Liberal Democratic world order. The favored icons came to be the Holy Three: Jews, Homos, and Negroes. The reasons are obvious. Jews chose themselves of course. Jews chose Negroes because Negroes are profitable to Jews in sports, entertainment, and sex industry. Also, Jews know that Negroes are the most potent force against whites. Why this need to browbeat and tame whites? Jews know that their supremacy depends on white submission to Jews. To make whites submit, they must be made to feel guilty and inferior. By invoking black slavery, Jews play on 'white guilt', thus paralyzing white pride and autonomy. And by promoting black prowess in sports, music, and sex, Jews turn white males into cucky-wuck wussies and turn white women into jungle feverish whores. No other race is as effective in undermining white pride and unity. Take American Indians. Due to the 'genocide' of the red man, whites could be baited with guilt about what they did to Indians, not least because genocide is worse than slavery. But because Indians are not a huge factor in sports, sex, and music, they are not effective as a weapon against white male pride and white women's loyalty to white men. So many white girls are now hooked to imitating blacks, 'twerking', worshiping black athletes, and creating sons who look and act like Colin Kaepernick.
As for homos, Jews chose them because both groups have something in common as high-achieving, neurotic, and arrogant elite minorities. Also, both are obsessed with entertainment, arts and ideas, gossip, and game of power. Jews have chutzpah, and homos have aristo flair. Also, as homos are flamboyant and fun-fun-fun, Jews know homo idolatry adds color and fanfare to globalism: The homo-rainbow and endless displays of homo and tranny exhibitionism. Jews also see Homo-Worship as useful weapon against Christianity and inverting traditional & normal goy values. And as every nation has its share of homos, Jews figure on recruiting and training queers in every nation as their useful toadies and allies. Also, by hyping the 'plight' of homos, the globo-homo empire morally justifies itself as a promoter of 'human rights'. Why do we need a new cold war with Russia? Uh... it doesn't have massive homo 'pride' parades. (As for Christian bakers who've had their lives destroyed because they won't make 'gay' wedding cakes? They don't count because the End of Iconarrativity trumps the End of History, or Homo Supremacism trumps freedom of conscience for bakers who refuse to participate in something vile and immoral because, after all, 'gay marriage' desecrates true marriage by associating marriage with homo fecal-penetration and tranny-penis-cutting.) US may be a 'liberal democracy' but one that worships a certain Iconarrativity that consecrates Jews, Negroes, and Homos as the holiest peoples. The globo-homo trinity of Jews, Negroes, and Homos is designed to be permanent. It doesn't matter what Jews, blacks, and homos do from now on. Jews are forever the Holy Holocaust People, Blacks are forever the Tragic Slavery People, and Homos are forever the Angelic Saints sprinkling 'rainbow' magic on us. Consider how Jews today act like Judeo-Nazis and have gone out of their way to confirm just about every 'antisemitic' trope and then some, but we are supposed to think of all Jews as Anne-Franks-Forever. The End of Iconarrativity demands it. https://www.gilad.co.uk/writings/2015/2/8/in-these-very-moments-the-protocols-are-being-rewritten Or consider all the black violence, thuggery, and nastiness. But we are supposed to see black reality forever through the narrative prism of TO KILL A MOCKING BIRD. Jussie Smollett was trying to pull a Mockingbird in the age of Gangsta Rap and out-of-control black thuggery.
This is why we can't talk honestly about Jewish power and corruption. This is why we can't have a honest discussion about black crime and violence. This is why we must pretend homos are holy victims when, in fact, HIV was the result of massive homo-fecal-penetration among obsessive fruitcakes ramming any pair of buns in sight. The End of Iconarrativity(as devised by Jews) fixed Jews, blacks, and homos as noble, holy, and magical for all time. They are like 'made men' in the Mafia.

If Middle America wants to bring down Uppermost America, it must surgically perform brain surgery and expose what's inside and how it works to control the world. It must do a Hannibal Lecter on the nerve center of Top America. Indeed, this was why Upper America took out Alex Jones. Granted, Jones was a sloppy surgeon and often a quack, but his scalpel did sometimes touch on the nerves of the globo-homo elites.

We must explode the Myth of American Liberal Democracy. While Fukuyama may have been right that the end of the Cold War was a triumph of liberal democracy over communism, he foolishly assumed that Idea or Ideal would determine the future. No, the fact is ideas are always shaped by individuals and identities. Why did Khrushchevism deviate from Stalinism? Why did Maoism deviate from Sovietism? Why did Castroism deviate from European communism? All were Marxist-Leninist but varied greatly according to individuals and identities involved. Indeed, notice what Dengism did to Maoism, and what Gorbachevism did to Brezhnevism. All these people were trained in communism as the End of History, but they still managed to reshape the ideology in profoundly different ways. This is even truer of Liberal Democracy. At least communism had a core set of tenets and dogma, which made deviation and heresy difficult except at the very top. In contrast, Liberal Democracy is generic and bland as a idea. It just ensures there shall be freedom of competition under the rule of law. But what happens when a particular group is so successful that it comes to control and corrupt the rule of law? That's been the outcome of Liberal Democracy since the end of the Cold War. Jews outpaced everyone else in the competition and gained dominant positions in media, academia, high tech, finance, law firms, law courts, vice industries like gambling, and deep state. Furthermore, Jews knew that the best way to secure their power for the long haul was to shield Jewishness from criticism. But how could this be done in a Liberal Democracy that is all about free speech and honest discussion of power? After all, isn't liberal democracy all about the freedom of conscience to speak truth to power, esp to the uppermost power? This is where the End of Narrative and Iconography became so crucial for the Jews. Unless Jews could close and seal(or 'terminalize') the Iconarrativity to fix Jews as permanently holy, perceptions about Jews could go from positive to negative depending on future Jewish behavior and/or historical revisions of Jewish-Goy relations. Without the End of Iconarrativity, new icons and narratives could emerge to challenge and topple the favored iconarrative status of Jews, e.g. Palestinians as the new holy victim group and Jews as the new supremacist group corrupted by excess wealth and power.
As people are quasi-spiritual(even in a modern secular liberal democracy) and hunger for sacred cows of some kind, Jews used academia, media, and the state to 'sacralize' Jews as the holy holocaust people, the Anne Frank people, the Schindler's List people FOR ALL TIME. Holocaust Movies now constitute a genre of its own, like Biblical movies of old. Also, the Jewish End of Iconarrativity has fixed Israel as not just another foreign nation but the 'greatest ally of the US' forever and ever and ever(like Jack Torrance in THE SHINING has been made to feel a special connection to the Overlook Hotel forever and ever and ever by the evil ghosts). What the Soviet-Chinese commie cabal did to Frank Sinatra and his men in THE MANCHURIAN CANDIDATE, Jewish power has done to US goy elites and masses who so mindlessly spout "Israel is the best, kindest, most wonderful, most holy, most super, most everything awesome under the sun, and the greatest ally of the US forever and ever."


Jews also used cuck-churches to spread the notion that it is God Himself who wills Americans to support Zionist bashing of subhuman Palestinians. So, criticism of Israel isn't merely political dissent but downright spiritual heresy. Of course, Jews exploit the stupidity of Evangelicals who are both pigheaded in their militancy and sappy in their sentimentality.
Since Jewish power became the biggest power but also one that no one must criticize, it grew ever more corrupt. Indeed, it isn't far-fetched to say the US is currently a Jewish gangster-fascist state(as opposed to a sane humanist-fascist state). Just like the so-called MSM obsesses more about fictional 'hate crimes' against 'innocent' blacks than about all the black-on-white crime and violence, it is more outraged by the slightest criticism of Jewish Power than by all the Jewish-supremacist hatreds against whites, Christians, Palestinians, Iranians, Libyans, Russians, and etc. Also, Jews claim to be against 'Islamophobia' but conveniently overlook the fact that it was all these Wars for Israel that have destroyed the lives of countless Muslims.

Now, Jews managed to pull this off with their control of ideology but there was another key factor. The problem with ideology is it comes with core tenets and principles that obey a certain logic. It can be a double-edged sword for those who wield it. Ideology is a thought-system, and as such, discrepancy or hypocrisy between what is said and what is done is often apparent. Jeremy Corbyn is a leftist ideologue, and as such, tries to be fair to both Jews and Palestinians on IDEOLOGICAL grounds. After all, if leftist logic is about opposing supremacism and favoring equal dignity for all, then the UK should not be supporting the Zionist-imperialist project in West Bank. While ideology is often abused, it comes with a rulebook, and it isn't difficult to discern the contradictions between what the power says and what it does. This is why Jewish Power understands that ideology alone isn't enough to guard their power. (The reason why Jews were more effective in persuading Protestants than Catholics is because the former, having forsaken the 'idolatry' of the Catholic Church, came to be defined more by words and credo of faith than by rituals, symbols, and icons. Therefore, Jews could point to the logical flaws in what the Protestants preached and what they actually practiced. In contrast, as Catholicism was heavily laden with iconography and ritualism, it was more impervious to logical arguments. You can't argue against wine, wafer, and holy water. Jews figured, "Use protestantist logic against goyim, use catholicist iconography to shield Jewish power.)
This is why Jews mastered the art of advertising and used its methodology in all their endeavors and projects. Thus, Ad-driven-ideology or 'Adeology' became the primary means by which Jews promoted themselves and gained control over others. If Jews had mainly emphasized the ideology of anti-supremacism(to invalidate white or goy supremacism) but then also pressured white folks to support Zionist imperialism over Palestinians, people will come to think more like Philip Giraldi or Ron Paul who find troublesome moral inconsistency in what Jews preach and what they practice. After all, why does the US claim to stand for egalitarian principles but then support the blatant Jewish supremacism over West Bank and wage all these insane Wars for Israel? Also, if sanctity of Jewishness is premised on having been victimized by evil Nazism, why are Jewish globalists allied with Neo-Nazis in Ukraine? Ideology has its dangers as an intellectual straitjacket, but it still works according to a certain set of rules and logic.
In contrast, advertising bypasses logic and reason. It works instantly or immediately, mainly via the subliminal power of association. After all, most ads are just pictures in magazines or short commercials on TV(some lasting 15 sec or less). If ads are so simple and short, why are they so damned effective in swaying millions, even billions, of people? Because of the psychological power of association. It's like the Albert Brooks as the ad guy in LOST IN AMERICA yammering about how Christmas can be associated with Las Vegas. His pitch came to fruition --reality now imitates jokes like life used to imitate art -- in America, but then, Christmas was long ago associated with crass materialism by the power of advertising.


The scene in LOST IN AMERICA is silly, but it conveys a real truth about the power of Advertising-as-Ideology or Advertising-over-ideology, or 'Adeology'. The human mind naturally seeks patterns, rhymes, parallels, associations. Why do so many people purchase certain products? Are all those shampoos really all that good? Or is it because the commercial associates the products with beautiful people and celebrities? Why should people buy a certain brand of cereal or pair of shoes? For many people, the main appeal is the product's association with some famous person or athlete. Now, Air Jordans aren't going to improve anyone's athletic skills, let alone turn him into a Michael Jordan, but kids who wear that stuff feel associated with Michael Jordan, as if there is a meeting of spirits through shoe-wear.
Or consider how Americans came to associate gambling with moral redemption. By doling out casinos to Indian Reservations as a form of 'reparation', the ugly vice became associated with redressing historical tragedies. Thus morally laundered, gambling could be promoted in all 50 states as a virtue industry than a vice industry.
So many Americans have come to support Israel mindlessly because of the power of Zionist 'Adeology'. At AIPAC conferences, giant screens blare with images juxtaposing the US flag with the Israel flag. And the speeches say little about real politics or history and instead run like Ad campaigns with slogans and jingles formulated to be soundbites quoted by the compliant MSM. "Israel is America's closest ally", "Israel is America's greatest ally", "America stands with Israel", etc. People who come under the spell of such barrage no longer need to think. For them, Zionism works like the greatest soap commercial.
Sigmund Freud's nephew Edward Bernays understood the power of advertising as the neo-iconography of the post-religious age. For most of traditionalist history, the dominant images or ideas were associated with eternal themes or mighty rulers. In European history from 500 to 1900, the most dominant(and recurring) images were those of Jesus and other Christian icons. In the Muslim world, the dominant images were Islamic symbols. In the Hindu world, it was Hindu images and symbolism. But with the rise of consumerism, the dominant images became consumer products and entertainment, a fact all-too-well understood by Andy Warhol. Since products-as-products are a bit boring, advertising associated products with famous stars, glamorous celebrities, or gorgeous fashion models. And in time, even TV shows and movies were like extended commercials with fancy cars, dress, products, and glam lifestyles. Advertising Companies gained the top power, possibly even over Hollywood, as the main idol-and-icon-generators. It's like people pay just as much attention to Superbowl commercials as to the Superbowl game itself. Indeed, after the game is over, there is more discussion of the ads than of the game that is over and done with.

Anyway, naturally The Power is going to use 'Adeology' to favor its own agenda. Notice the sheer paucity of Palestinian narrative or iconography in the media. Last year was the 70th anniversary of Nakba Pogroms, but there was virtually no mention of the term in the media and government. (If any politician in Congress had requested a moment of silence to commemorate the tragedy, he would have been lynched and destroyed by the entire Jewish Power Complex.) In contrast, politicians, media people, and etc. have spouted off a million times about not only Israel but Israel-as-America's-greatest-ally. Americans never see an image of the US flag juxtaposed with the Palestinian flag, but we've all seen countless images of the Israel flag associated with US flag.
Humans take pride in being creatures of reason(unlike stupid animals), but most times, we sense reality by instant-associations than by logical reason. If this weren't true, commercials would have little impact on us. Advertising has tremendous sway over us because our minds are essentially Pavlovian. (Indeed, even when we know commercials are mostly BS on the rational level, we are affected by them on the subliminal and sensual level.) Just like dogs can be made to associate bells with food even though bells and food have no direct relation, our minds can be made to associate anything with anything. They can be made to associate the vice of gambling with the virtue of historical redress. They can be made to associate Zionism with the Holocaust. Even though Zionism predated WWII by 70 yrs and even though Israel was created AFTER World War II in which Evil Nazi Germany was totally crushed, we've been led to believe Israel was an existential necessity to save Jews from the Holocaust. Associate Israel with the Holocaust enough times, and people begin to believe the two are inseparably linked. But it's a bogus association because, if Jews really needed a safe space after the horrors of WWII, Palestine was a rather odd place for a Jewish homeland as Jews would be surrounded by tons of enraged Arabs. Also, if the lesson of the Holocaust is that racial supreamcism is bad, how does it justify Zionism's ideology of Jews uber Palestinians?
But the associative power of 'Adeology' distracts us from moral logic and historical reason. Just repeat, "Israel is America's greatest ally" while staring at an image of the US flag and the Israel flag melding into one. Even a cursory glance at the news media makes it clear as day that they're hardly distinguishable from advertising. Media are owned by super-rich people who invest huge sums in certain politicians, agendas, or movements. Why would they undermine their own investments in business, politics, and society by allowing the media to be rational, fair, and impartial in their pursuit of truth? Carlos Slim didn't invest in NYT to have it counter his agenda. Jeff Bezos didn't buy Washington Post to have it rail against him and Amazon. Jews didn't spend billions on media ownership to spread news and views that might undermine the Jewish supremacist project. George Soros doesn't fund all these 'universities' to foster free thought that might conclude that Soros is a son of a bitch and globalism sucks. So, most of media work just like advertising. Media carefully vet the kind of reporters who will be good dogs. Indeed, the conditioning happens from grade-school to college as the Media-and-Academia-Combine(controlled by Jews) target kids for indoctrination and 'idolatration' from the youngest age possible.
Most of MSM is just propaganda or Ad-wars for the Deep State that takes its orders from Jewish Power. Mass Media are Jewish-controlled industry colluding with Deep State operatives who are mostly either Jewish or goy-puppets of Jews. Jewish Power is about network tyranny. There is no single Jew who is all-powerful like Stalin or Mao. Even super-rich Jews like Bloomberg and Adelson, on their own, could do only so much. But Jewish power is vast and networked in elite institutions and industries, and Jews have developed an instinctive tribal-supremacist hive-mindset that allows for synchronized coordination even without communication. For example, if a politician condemns the US involvement in Syria, so many Jews in media, academia, state, law firms, Hollywood, and etc, all think and feel alike: Syria is ally of Iran, enemy of Israel. For Israel's interests, Syria must be ruined. Anyone defending Syria must be destroyed. Even without talking with one another, most Jews instantly know what-is-up and what-must-be-done. So, instantly, the Jewish hive-action kicks into gear in all sectors to attack the defender of Syria. Now, Jews will not come out and admit this is how they feel and why they do what they do, but they all KNOW. They (((know))), and based on that hive-mind knowledge, they read from The Script to push the Jewish supremacist agenda. Of course, for general consumption(by us goy dummies), Jews in media, academia, state, and etc. will repeat the same talking points about 'Assad murders his own people', 'Assad uses gas', 'Assad is puppet of Putin', and 'Syria is a threat to Israel'(even though it's Israel that has been violating Syrian air space and dropping tons of bombs). But deep down inside, Jews know it's all about securing Jewish supremacism in the Middle East.

Now, returning to the problem of Middle America, one of its essential tasks must be the development of the Middle Mind. In a normal political order, the Middle usually goes about their daily routines and elects leaders to represent them and do the Big Stuff. They leave the policies and planning to the elites and elected officials. And the US used to have a functional elite system when white politicians paid heed to white voters(though, to be sure, politicians were always whores of oligarchs and moneymen; but then, white oligarchs of the past felt greater affinity with others of their race). Today, capitalist oligarchs are globo-homo freaks whose main attachment is to the class of super-achievers and super-rich all around the world. Bill Gates and Warren Buffett are closer and feel cozier with billionaires and fancy elites around the world than with the lower members of their own race.
People have forgotten that white race-ism did wonders for peoples all around the world, though often unintentionally. Race-ism forced white elites to favor their own folks over non-white elites. So, the British Empire was about the British elites favoring poor whites and working class whites as fellow countrymen than favoring non-white elites. Traditional British were obsessed with class, but they still favored race-ism over class-ism. Race-ism forced white elites to represent, defend, and feel loyal to their own racial kin and folks. It forced a certain socialism as noblesse oblige on the white elites.
This had a great impact on non-whites as well. Non-white elites were tempted to dump most of their own kind(as the masses of any society are 'losers' and 'dummies') and cozy up to white elites. So many Hindu and Chinese elites were more than willing to collaborate with European imperialism and dilly-dally with white elites. But when push came to shove, European imperialist elites favored race-ism over class-ism. British elites favored British masses over non-white elites, and French elites favored French masses over non-white elites. This 'insult' and slight had an ennobling effect on non-white elites. Snubbed by race-ist white elites, they also took up the banner of nationalist race-ism and championed their own peoples against the white imperialist elites. This led to the great anti-imperialist and pro-nationalist Third World movements. White elites were with white masses, and non-white elites were with their own masses. Thus, the world politics came to be about the masses looking up to their own elites as national defenders and champions. Like how the Vietnamese came to regard Ho Chi Minh, how the Indians came to regard Gandhi, and how Cubans came to regard Castro. (If the British elites hadn't discriminated against men like Gandhi, the latter would have become a bunch of Fareed Zakarias and Francis Fukuyamas, deracinated and traitorous Servitors of Empire. Zakaria cheers for US destruction of Syria, and Fukuyama is George Soros' boy who pushes population replacement for Hungary and Japan[though never for Israel].) The form of poly-nationalism or universal nationalism that came to prominence after WWII seemed to work just fine, but Jews came to resent it as they became the imperial elites of the US as the lone superpower. Jews loved nationalism for Israel where Jewish elites and Jewish masses were bound by history, culture, and blood. But goy nationalism was bad for the Jewish supremacist project because goy nationalism means that the primary obligation of goy elites is to their goy masses, e.g. Hungarian elites for Hungarian masses, Russian elites for Russian masses, Chinese elites for Chinese masses, white Christian American elites for white Christian American masses. This was frustrating for Jewish supremacism because it depends on goy elites serving Jewish hegemonists than representing and defending goy masses. So, Jews spread the notion that nationalism, at least among goyim, is 'far right', 'xenophobic', 'neo-nazi', 'racist', and 'exclusionary'. And Jews said all nations(except Israel) must embrace Diversity as the ultimate ideal. After all, Diversity could be used by Jews to drive a wedge between native goy elites and native goy masses. If goy elites must uphold Diversity above all, then they must prioritize the demands of foreign immigrant-invaders and minorities than the needs of their own folk. And it means that the native masses who decry Diversity and Replacement-Immigration should be denounced as 'racist' and 'xenophobic'.
Once the goy elites have been decoupled from their goy masses, they could be used to serve the interest of Jewish super-elites. In some ways, this arrangement was appealing to white elites as well because it's more fun for elites(of any kind) to favor other elites than care about their own people. Elite-to-elite network is a community of winners. In contrast, race-ist nationalism means winners must also be concerned with losers of their own kind. Zionism is about Jewish-Israeli elites being primarily bound to Israeli-Jewish people, whereas the Irish and Swedish national policies are now about the elites being most loyal to globo-homo hegemony, snubbing & excoriating their national folk over the slightest hint of 'racism' and 'xenophobia', and rolling out the red carpet to endless tides of immigrant-invaders who holler, "Where da white women at?"
One of the reason why Jewish globalists were eager to end communism in the Soviet Union was the system was about winners taking care of losers. Communism was a bad system and ineffective, but it did bind the Soviet elites to Soviet masses. But with communism gone, the Soviet elites could unchain themselves from the masses and scheme with Jewish globalists to make some serious dough for themselves. Of course, Jews would take the lion share of the wealth, but there was plenty to go around for the ex-Soviet goy elites who decided to roll the dice with the globalists.

Though it may seem counter-intuitive, globalism is dangerous to all peoples precisely because it is anti-race-ist. Unlike old Western Imperialism that was race-ist and upheld the unity of white elites and white masses, globalism is about white elites handing the white masses the divorce paper(a kind of no-fault divorce) to sever ties of contract and, instead, joining the swinging-set with globo-elites all around the world. Since Western globalist elitism no longer discriminates against non-white elites, even non-white elites are abandoning their own race-ist nationalism and scrambling to join the globo-homo Elysium World of winners-to-winners networking. Nicer for rich Hindu families to raise their kids to join Elysium of winners than devote their lives to improving the lot of so many Hindu losers who still shit outdoors.
And naturally, Jews have promoted globo-homo or Homomania as the ideology and 'idology' of the New World Order becasue (1) Jews prize homos as fellow elite minorities (2) homos are naturally aristo in style and attitude (2) homomania de-moralizes and de-culturalizes peoples and nations and promotes fads and fashions of 'Adeology' controlled by Jews.
Needless to say, Israel gets passover privilege from globalist denunciation of nationalism and race-ism as pathology and disease. Mono-Nationalism of Zionism says Jews and only Jews are deserving of nationalism, racial identity, and unity-solidarity of elites and folks. When Jews touch nationalism, it's pure gold. When goyim touch nationalism, it is lead poisoning... so says the twisted Jewish Logic that is for Jewish Mono-nationalism and against Poly-nationalism of goy peoples.

In a sane nation, the elites would try to moralize the populace because a moral, decent, and virtuous people are best for society. But Jews don't see goy populace as kinfolk worthy of care and concern. If anything, Jews see goy mass morality as a threat to Jewish power that is now awash in financial crookedness, vice industries, profits via pornification of mainstream culture, senseless Wars for Israel, and big pharma drug-peddling. An 'immoralized' people are less likely to be morally outraged by the filth and foulness of corrupt elites. So, Jews turned Disney into a slut-factory. (But because Disney began as a Family Entertainment Industry, its recent slut-promotion and homo-tranny propaganda are associated with 'Family Values'. More Adeology in action.) Jews promoted homomania as neo-christianity, to the point where so many Western churches now worship 'rainbow'-homo over God and Jesus. Jewish power bitches about 'hate speech'(as defined by Jewish haters who never berate Israel for its crimes) but does NOTHING about how hardcore porn is now readily accessible to young kids. There is promotion of tattoos, piercing, and sexual perversions of all kind, like 'pegging' a man by a woman with a dildo strap-on. We have news articles saying that straight men(!!) should experiment in 'gay' sex and take it up the arse. Jewish power de-moralized Americans of true morality and re-moralized them with fake morals, such as 'empowerment via slut pride', celebration of 'gay pride', promotion of trannies as 'real women', New Cold War against Russia that wants peace, endless 'hate hoaxes' concocted to promote anti-white defamation as fight-against-bigotry, stupid nonsense about 'white privilege' to distract people from Jewish privilege, 'gay marriage', and other forms of insanity. Jews would have us believe the New Normal constitutes 'universal values', but it is actually 'inversal values' as it's premised on inverting all the time-tested forms of virtue, integrity, morality, sanity, and normality.

Middle America must develop its own mind because Upper America has called for divorce. When a man says "I divorce you" and departs, the woman must no longer expect to be taken care of by him, especially if the law say he doesn't have to give her anything. In the movie UNMARRIED WOMAN, Jill Clayburgh finally comes to take care of herself after her husband dumped her. In TWICE IN A LIFETIME, the jilted wife learns to land on her own feet after her hubber dumps her. The big fat truth of American Politics is that the white elites divorced the white middle. White Middle must learn to think for itself and fend for itself and say FU to the elites. And remember, it was the white elites that rejected the white masses, not the other way around. The problem of Middle America is it is still under the impression that there is a marriage contract between itself and white elites. It will do better to break free of this delusion.


Upper White America is now just a mistress of Jewish supremacist globalist pimp, and it prefers to dilly-dally with non-white elites around the world who have also filed divorce papers to cut ties with their own national folks. Even Japanese political and business elites are giving up on their own people and preparing Japan to become another Brazil. Closer to home, look at the white elites of Canada and Australia. They will gladly dump on their own national folks and go shmoozing with Jewish elites, Chinese elites, and Hindu elites. Australian white elites will gladly sell entire swaths of national territory to Chinese and Hindu tycoons. White Canadian elites sneer at white masses and offer entire areas of their cities to Hindu, Chinese, and Muslim oligarchs and rich folks.
Most sadly, even much of Middle America, Middle Canada, and Middle Australia(and Middle Britain of course) have been sold on globalism because everyone from top to bottom has been brainwashed with mantras of Diversity, magic of Great Negro, wonders of Holy Jew(and universal obligatory worship of holy holocaust), and globo-homo fanfare. For most people, pop culture and advertising are their only culture. And virtually everyone who attends college is brainwashed into rejecting race-ism(except for Jews), nationalism, and true moralism. They come to believe Diversity is the highest good(even though diversity is the product of imperialism), race-mixing is the panacea of all problems(even though race-mixing has usually been the product of invasion & rape and interracism is predicated on racial superiority-inferiority, e.g. white women should go with black men who are superior to white dorks in muscle, vocality, and dong size). Look at Ireland. Once proudly nationalist, 70% of its people voted to pass 'gay marriage', and the idiot masses are so enamored to have some hindu homo as prime minister.

Of course, the white cucky-wuck elites prefer the new arrangement because the fading of nationalism and race-ism means that the native masses can no longer press upon the national elites to work for the common national good. Indeed, the very notion of shared national interest went out the window in New Ireland that is defined by More Diversity than by national identity and solidarity. So, what are Ireland and Irish interests under the globo-homo regimen where Ireland is now all about taking in tons of Africans, Muslims, and Hindus as the New Irish? It means the end of real Ireland and Irish people. Of course, Irish elites will have a grand time selling their nation down the river because they can capitalize on dilly-dallying with globalist elites of all races and colors. Winner-to-winner peer-networking. Irish have a contradictory mindset because they were both the most committed resisters against Anglo-Imperialism as well as its greatest collaborators. Even as the Irish sought to free Ireland from British Rule, the Irish followed the Anglos all over the world to colonize the New World, Asia, Africa, and etc. Today, UK and Ireland are almost indistinguishable in that both are under the globo-homo hegemony of the Empire of Judea. As such, their fates are now virtually identical and intertwined: Worship Jews, Negroes, and Homos. Open Borders and destruction of native identity. That said, the Irish worship the Jews so much that they've become, paradoxically enough, anti-Zionist(a development also evident in the British Labour Party). Irish politics and British Labour worship Jews as the Holy Holocaust people and have swallowed Jewish-led globohomo pro-diversity propaganda so totally that they are appalled by Jews acting like New Nazis in West Bank and Gaza. Jews are pulling their hair over this because they've steered themselves into a trap of their own making. After all, the position of Ireland and Labour Party is the logical conclusion of Jewish globo-homo ideology of diversity-mongering. Perhaps, the Irish and Labour Party need more doses of 'Adeology' than ideology so that they will think less about the issues and just get all teary-eyed with mantras of "Israel is our greatest ally".

Anyway, how does Middle America develop a mind of its own? Via the internet, the dispersed world of Middle America must create networks across cities, suburbs, small towns. Across all 50 states. Middle America must drop the complacent habit of letting OTHERS do the thinking for it. It must learn to think and talk for itself. Alt Right had a chance to play this role, but idiots like Richard Spencer blew it with egomania and flirting with trashy 14/88 garbage.
In the past, Middle America relied on figures like Rush Limbaugh to be its spokesman, but as Big Media are concentrated in few hands, most of the talking points came to be about 'lower taxes', silly sentimentality about Reagan, 'Israel, Israel, Israel', and etc. Rush Limbaugh was a huge champion of 'free trade' and globo-capitalism. He extolled winners and berated 'losers'. This 'voice of Middle America and its fruited plains' lionized super-capitalists as champions of freedom and liberty. Fast forward to today, and we now know these super-oligarchs are anti-nationalist, anti-conservative, anti-white-solidarity, and anti-freedom. It's been none other than the super-capitalists who deplatformed people, deny payment services and even banking to dissidents, and used big media to spread homomania. They use law firms to shut down free speech and go after virtuous bakers who refused to bake 'gay wedding' cakes. Also, as the 'voices of Middle America' on Talk Radio make their money from commercials paid for by globohomo super-capitalists, they don't even dare to speak truth to Homo power or Jewish power. They're a bunch of pathetic cucks.

Now, if Middle America had all the time in the world, it should work patiently to study hard and work itself into elite domains, just like the 60s radicals did in the 'long march through the institutions'. But there is no time for this. Demographics are changing too fast. So, Middle America must make its voices heard from where it is, the Middle. This would have been impossible in the past, but with the right tools and organization an authentic Middle American voice can be created via the internet. A media network that links all places, from biggest cities to smallest towns.
Even though the internet is accessible to all peoples and places, there has yet to be a unified platform that consolidates and connects all of Middle America into a Mind and Mouth of its own that is truly independent of puppet-strings of the globo-homo oligarchs and their commissars and agents.

First of all, there must be a war of terminology. Those who control terminology rig the game to favor their own ideology and agenda. Take a term like 'homophobia' that intrinsically favors the homo agenda because the very wording assumes that there is such a thing as phobia about homos when there isn't. There is a lot of negative feelings about homos, but it's not a phobia, an extreme panicked fearful reaction to something that is harmless. People who are turned off by homosexuality have sound, natural, and moral reasons. I mean it's about guys f***ing each other in the ass. Even if we tolerate such stuff, it is ugly, gross, and disease-prone. But the term 'homophobia' rigs the discourse in favor of homomania by assuming that anyone who is critical of or turned off by homosexuality is suffering from a clinical pathology. Or take the utter corruption of term 'antisemitism' that now means speaking the most obvious truths about Jewish Power. Even honest Tru-Semitism, or truthful criticism about Jewish influence, is shouted down as 'antisemitic', a term associated with Nazis and the like.

Anyway, Middle America is finished unless it develops a mind and mouth of its own. It must first wake up and read the divorce papers signed by white elites who chose to pimp themselves to Jewish super-elites and join in the globo-homo elite orgy. Just look at Justin Trudeau, the Man for All Costumes, and Emmanuel Macron, the Negro hugger who says real Frenchness is in Africa, implying France must take in endless numbers of stronger and donger black guys who will beat up weaker French guys and hump French women.
White elites handed divorce papers to white folks. They are now in 'free love' dalliance with Diversity. Understanding this, White people and Middle America must tell themselves every day, "White elites are NOT our elites. They are globo-homo whores of Zion. They are swingers, not loyal spouses to the national folk." Understanding this truth, white people and Middle America must decide that, because white elites no longer feel any sense of obligation to white masses, the white masses in turn should feel zero loyalty to white elites. So, if white elites make any demand on white masses, give them the middle finger or the Middle American Finger... just like Yellow Jackets in France are telling Macron to go to hell. Why should white masses serve the power, privilege, wealth, and status of white elites when scum like Bill Gates and Jeff Bezos just shi* on them? The hell with globohomo 'free trade' capitalism. Middle America or 'Kansas'(of "What's the Matter with Kansas" by Thomas Frank) should turn Social-Nationalist and say FU to the rich and affluent. Rush Limbaugh assured his listeners that the rich and successful would defend liberty and freedom of all the people from the State, but it turns out that the rich, especially Jewish ones, are spearheading efforts to take away our speech, our rights, and our guns. Via hyper-capitalism, they gain monopoly over media and platforms and treat the masses like Israel treats Palestinians in West Bank. Middle America was told that capitalism is great because profits and self-interest bring together even peoples who don't see eye to eye ideologically or tribally. Business means profits, and that means anyone will sell to anyone for more money, thus assuring co-existence of all peoples on the basis of business interests. But look how the big capitalists collude with the Deep State to shut down even banking and payment systems to certain individuals and groups. Look at the vile Jewish supremacist efforts to shut down BDS and free speech that calls for justice for Palestinians. Jewish capitalists fund politicians to proscribe the rights of Palestinian-Americans and their sympathizers. Look at Tim Cook that vile scum who speaks of 'sin' -- funny talk from a guy whose life revolves around taking penises up his poopchute -- and how Apple must censor anyone hated by Zionists who murder Palestinians. Limbaugh couldn't have been more wrong. Libertarianism was one big fraud that, boiled down to essentials, means the those with most money and biggest monopolies can use their muscle to do just about anything.

Middle America or Middle FINGER America must ask why it must support Jews against Palestinians(and Wars for Israel) when Jewish Power treats whites like Zionists treat Palestinians. Middle Finger America must break free from fat fartbags like John Hagee who has poisoned countless minds with blind worship of Jews and Israel(even though all polls show that Jews hate and despise white Evangelicals even more than Muslims). And if white cuck elites bitch and complain about how Middle Finger America isn't sufficiently loyal to the GOP(that snubbed white people who voted for it in favor of globo-homo hegemony), it should do a Janet Jackson on them and ask "What have you done for me lately?" As white elites declared divorce on white masses, they have no right to demand loyalty from white people. When white elites collaborate with Jewish super-elites to replace white folks and turn all of US into one big California, why should white masses do anything for white elites(who suck up to Jews than serve their own race)?


We need a Left-Right, and by that, I don’t mean that ‘rightists’ should join with ‘leftists’ or take up current ‘leftist’ agendas. Today’s ‘left’ is either crazy, stupid, or silly. (Today’s establishment ‘right’ is gutless and pathetic. A bunch of whores.) What I mean is that the Real Right should adopt certain Real Left themes. The Real Right doesn’t need to form an alliance the Far Left or the crazy ‘left’. Certainly not with the ridiculous globo-homo pseudo-left. But the Real Right can look back on history and recognize the noblest themes of the Real Left and incorporate them into the larger Agenda. Thus, the Left-Right. A Real Right enriched with adoption of the best themes of the Real Left.

Also, to clear thing up, we need to speak of White Elite Privilege.

The US is really about White Elite Privilege, not White Privilege.
White Elites really do have privilege and work hard to justify & keep it by spouting PC cliches about fighting ‘white privilege’, thus spreading the blame around to ALL whites, most of whom don’t have privilege. It’s a trick of spreading the blame to stay in the game.

We have to stop talking of ‘White Privilege’. The term is overly broad and generic. Too often, the debate is about ‘there is white privilege’ vs ‘there is no white privilege’.
The problem is ‘white’ is too expansive and inclusive a category, including everyone from Bill Gates to toothless hillbilly in W. Virginia. So, ‘white privilege’ is pointless as it includes even dirt poor whites with nothing and are often victimized by black thugs.

But there really is White Elite Privilege. Paradoxically, in order for White Elites to keep their considerable status and privilege, they must denounce ‘White Privilege’. It is oh-so-very convenient for them because they, as the clever educated and affluent, get to posture as agents of ‘social justice’ against the white working class and ‘deplorables’ who resist ‘change’. (Diversity also favors the elites over the masses. In a homogeneous society, the rich elites are at a moral disadvantage vis-a-vis the masses who have less. But in a diverse society, the rich elites can hug Diversity[mostly as tokens and peons] and accuse the have-nots of ‘racism’ and ‘xenophobia’. Thus, moral advantage goes to the elites.)
To expose these a**holes and bring them down, we need to use the term, White Elite Privilege. Or White Comprador Elite Privilege because white elite privilege is in service to Jewish Super-Privilege. As Jewish Power has rigged the Narrative to make Jews holy & pure while making whites tainted & guilty, white elites must appear to atone for past sins in order to justify and keep their privilege. Jews exploit this psychology by steering guilt-ridden white elites to serve Jewish power and Zionism, and the white elites play along because it isn’t all that difficult to shout out ‘Long Live Israel’ and wave the Israeli flag. Sure beats being dragged to labor camps for re-education. We need to talk of White Elite Privilege vs White Mass Problems. Change the terms of the debate, and people will think differently.

We call for POLY-NATIONALISM for the World and Oppose the MONO-NATIONALISM of Jewish Supremacism

It's time for truth. The Mono-nationalism of the Jews isn't workable. It certainly isn't sane or honorable. If anything, it is arrogant, stingy, hypocritical, and megalomaniacal. If Monotheism is the conviction that there is only one true God, with all other gods being false, Mononationalism is the belief that only one people are deserving of a strong and continuous sense of identity, history, culture, and territory, with the rest of humanity relegated to permanent scattered uprooted-ness. Most Modern Jews are Mononationalist in their insistence that they and only they have the right to say and do whatever, by any means necessary, to secure their own survival, security, power, and even dominance. (Indeed, Mono-nationalism is innately imperialist and supremacist since it denies the right of other peoples to have their own identity, culture, and territory worthy of preservation and continuity.)
Furthermore, Mononationalism is far more dangerous than Monotheism. Unlike Monotheism, which is about a state of mind and matter of the soul, Mononationalism is about policies and agendas that affect the actual workings of the material world which we all inhabit. When Ancient Hebrews clung to their monotheism of the one and only true God(as opposed to all other gods rejected as false), it was a concept within their mind. People can believe in anything without directly affecting others. Judaic ideas were spiritual and cosmological, not directly political upon the rest of the world. Jews could despise but still tolerate other cultures with 'false gods', and in turn, non-Jews could tolerate Jews with their peculiar religion. You believe your thing, I believe my thing. It's like a Beatles fan and a Rolling Stones fan disagreeing but tolerating one another. You believe John Lennon is best, I believe Mick Jagger is best. Live and Let Live.

In contrast, Modern Jews are into Mono-Nationalism, a powerful chutzpastic political-militant ideology, that declares Israel and Jewish Identity are the only True Nationalism while all other forms of Nationalism of goyim are false. This isn't merely a matter of the mind but a blueprint for real world politics that directly affects every person around the world. Just ask the Palestinians who already lost their homeland and the whites who are losing their homelands under the hegemony of Jewish Mono-Nationalism. According to twisted Jewish Logic, when Jews are proudly and resolutely nationalist it is good and noble because Zionism and Jewish Pride are the only true and worthy forms of nationalism. Logically then, it follows that when non-Jews invoke their own nationalism, it must be Evil & Wicked because Jews and only Jews can have the one and only true nationalism. As Jews never tire of reminding us, Jewish Power and Zionism are wonders to behold whereas the slightest hint of White Consciousness is 'far right', 'white supremacist', and 'xenophobic'. Given the sheer hypocrisy, arrogance, and contempt of Jews who think this way, why do so many non-Jews(especially those of white Christian background) fall for this obvious crap? (Even though Jews despise non-white goyim and use globalism to destroy non-white nations as well[especially in the Arab-Muslim World], countless non-white goyim collaborate with Jews because they prefer to live in white nations than in their own 'shitholes'. If given a choice between living in white nations and defending their own nationalism, many non-whites will choose the former. 'Diversity' means non-whites preferring to live with whites than with non-whites. After all, non-whites run from diverse non-white nations for white nations, even homogeneous ones. If they love 'diversity' so much, why do they flee from it toward white homogeneity?)

Possibly, Christianity may have been good for the soul but bad for politics. It may have undermined the national psychology of European goyim. Consider the Crusades that once drained Europe of so many of its men and resources. Under the spell of a Faith of Near Eastern origin, Europeans time and time again became enmeshed in faraway affairs and obsessed over the Holy Land as their True Homeland, the ultimate place to live for, die for, and/or kill for. Many Crusaders were more committed to retaking or defending the Holy Land(a world of Arabs and Semites) than safeguarding their own native local domains in the European Homeland. They wasted precious resources on Crusades than on their own domains.
The Monotheism of Christianity and Islam had greater political impact on the world(than Judaic Monotheism did) because of its universalism and messianism. Unlike Jews who believed in One God but didn't bother with the beliefs of others -- if anything, Jews anxiously guarded their Faith for themselves, which is why they hated renegade Jews like Jesus and Paul who dared to pass the torch to Filthy Goyim -- , Christians and Muslims were convinced that they must liberate and save the entire world with the one true Faith. Also, the universal faith provided convenient cover for Christian and Muslim imperialists whose conquests were motivated more by greed and power-lust than saving souls.

White Christians hearkened to the Church that mythologized the Holy Land as the true spiritual homeland. Given such mindset, when white Christians weren't trying to retake the Holy Land itself, they embarked on adventures and projects to find or found the New Eden or New Jerusalem. And then, as Christianity began to fade in the second half of the 20th Century, the secular cult of Holocaustianity came to be quasi-worshiped as the new Mono-Faith for the West(and hopefully for All Mankind), and so, the New American Theme came to revolve around securing the Holy Land for Holy Holocaust Jews and doing their bidding to expand Zionist hegemony all throughout Middle East and North Africa. Anything to win approving pats on the head from the holy holocaust Jews, the neo-messiahs of the New Era. But because most nations don't have Jews, the Tribe also decided to promote Homomania or Queertianity in the 21st Century to recruit homos(and trannies) in every nation to serve as key comprador-collaborators of Jews.

Given the current mindset of white goyim, it’s no wonder Jewish Power so deftly manipulates goy consciousness to make it forsake its own nationalism in order to serve and submit to the Mono-Nationalism of Jews. Whites, as neo-globohomo-christians, don't deserve homelands of their own and, instead, must praise and serve the one and only true nationalism of the Jews in Israel and the elysium-realm of Jewish globalist networking. In contrast, Jews, as ur-tribal-supremacist-Judaics, confidently get to own and secure their own identity and territory, that of the one and only true nation, which stands tough and hale as the spiritual center of World Jewish Power that gets to decide the fate of rest of humanity under the Zionic spell and/or whip.

ONLY JEWS ARE CHOSEN. The Rest of Humanity is to be CHASED around by Globo-Homo Imperialism.

Jewish-controlled Mono-Nationalist Thought pushes forth Two Credos for the New American Empire. One says: Jews are the ONLY people deserving of a unique and particular nationalism of their own. 'A World of Our Own' for Jews Only. The Other says: Americanism is the only trans-nationalism for all goyim of the whole world; so, America must be a beacon and harbor for ALL peoples, and ALL other goy nations must be ‘Americanized’, or deracinated and cucked into senseless-consumerism-as-lifestyle and mindless-worship-of-Jews-blacks-homos-as-the-Holy-Three.

Whites must say NO to Jewish Mono-Nationalism and defend the universal right of Poly-Nationalism: Poly-Nationalism posits there many different peoples with divergent histories, culture, and genetics. Each people have a legitimate claim of independence and sovereignty in their own territory in which their folks laid down roots and buried their ancestors. Otherwise, all goy nations will just turn into deforested weed-infested mudslides at the mercy of the globo-homo typhoons instead of remaining as vital forests with deep-rooted trees of peoples and their historic cultures.

Valuable Property has to be secured with Covenant or Contract(backed with force). If not, Others will come to Take it — Dynamics of Gold Rush teaches us about the current White Rush — Why Jews needed the Covenant to claim God for themselves

Way of the World. When people hear of easy gold, they drop everything and all go rushing for it.

Way of the World. When there is a Kill to Steal, other animals come to take it.

Way of the World. Ants flock to easy white sugar.

People need to understand The Way. The Way of the World is as follows: If someone or some people have something of great value, OTHERS will come to try to take it or partake of it. Greatness is great but has an Achilles Heel. Greatness is a double-edged sword. If you have something great, it is a thing to admire but also a thing to acquire. The whole world wants it, and if given a chance, will gladly take it. If a woman has great beauty and if it could be appropriated by plain-faced women, would they take it? Of course they would.

Just like something of great value has a vulnerability — everyone wants to take it —, something of lower value has an intrinsic security, a kind of a modest advantage. If you have something of low value, it may not be worth much, but then, you need not worry about others taking it from you. Who breaks into a house to steal a piece of iron? They’ll burglarize for gold though. It’s like a man with a beautiful wife is more insecure than a man with an average wife. More men will try to make a move to take the beautiful wife from the husband. So many invaders came to Ireland long ago because of its reputation for having the most beautiful women. It’s probably why Irish men had to be tough and unpleasant because they had to fight all the time to keep their women from Vikings and other horny invasive bastards.
If you have something of great value, it’s wonderful to have it, but then, you must always remind yourself that everyone else wants it too; they want to take it from you. This is why anyone who finds gold better be very quiet about it or make legal claim backed up by guns to keep the gold for himself. Otherwise, there’s gonna be a Gold Rush, like in the days of the 49ers. Because white nations are deemed the best and most desirable in the world, Mass-Immigration-Invasions are essentially a form of White Rush. Non-whites salivate, “Let’s all rush to white nations and grab the white gold.” They will cook up any number of reasons(mostly bogus) to make their claim.

Jews understood this dynamics because they experienced it many times over as both takers and taken. Jews greedily eyed what the goyim had and tried to take it from goyim, and goyim greedily eyed what the Jews and tried to take it from Jews. Jews created the most powerful and profound concept of God(at least one that is accessible to most people, as Hinduism may be more profound but is exceedingly confusing and complex). With every passing year in the Ancient World, the pagan gods seemed sillier(just superhumans with lots of flaws) whereas the Jewish God seemed infinitely mysterious and meaningful. So, naturally, there was the real danger of goyim trying to take this God of the Jews for themselves. And so, Jews came up with the Covenant, a spiritual-legal contract between God and Jews. Jews told goyim, “Yeah sure, our God is the one and only God of all, but He has a special contract with us, so you filthy goyim back off and stay away from our God.” Now, that’s good thinking. But then, a bunch of renegade Jews managed to smuggle the concept and reformulate it for universal acquisition. Jews must still be pissed over this because Google never runs Easter doodles.
Jews also mastered the Law because they amassed great fortunes. The Way of the World is for have-nots to grab stuff from the have-mores(or for have-mores to take even more from other have-mores). It’s been like that since time immemorial. So, Jews needed the protection of the Law to back up their claims. (But then, Jews also mastered the law to justify their taking of stuff from other peoples, such as land from Palestinians.)

Now, Anglos found the bestest land in the world. It’s hard to think of better expanse of territory than North America. Western Europe is nice but small. Russia is vast but much of it’s too cold, too dry, or desolate. China is huge but relatively lacking in natural resources for such a huge chunk of land. South America is vast but hot and jungly. Africa is huge but hotter, much of it parched and dry. Australia is huge but mostly useless. North America has prime land for agriculture and has tons of resources of all kinds. It has great natural beauty. It has everything.
On top of that, it was settled by the most advanced and talented people of the Time with sound genetics and intelligent culture. And these early Anglos and Northern Europeans knew what they’d stumbled upon. It was like Second Eden come true. If they took over the territory and populated it with their own kind, it would surely be the greatest power in the world. And the prophecy came true. It wasn’t long before the US became the most powerful nation(and Canada became essentially US-lite, the 51st state).
This is why the Founders were proud race-ists. They understood that the US needed a racial contract between whites and the land. Blood and Toil, i.e., because adventurous whites explored and found the land and toiled to build it, it was theirs by the covenant of vision and history. Indians had been here first, but they were savages who hadn’t made much of the land. Without such proud and powerful claim, others would come to the US and try the take it away from whites. Naturally, all throughout history, people have flocked to greatness and tried to take it or partake of it.
Now, Jews have a great eye, having worked as pawnbrokers and jewelers forever. They know real value when they see it, and they never saw anything like America. Great land with tremendous resources and managed by talented Northern Europeans, the most capable people in the world. So, how could they take over this bounty for the Tribe? First, by flattering the white goyim. Assure the Anglo elites that Jews and immigrants are oh-so-very-grateful to assimilate into Anglo-America. Put forth the notion of the Melting Pot, the ‘dream’ that immigrants would simply and happily melt into existing America and become good Americans of the Anglo mold…. except that as more and more ingredients were added to the American Pot, the dynamics went FROM the new-ingredients-melting-into-the-existing-elements TO existing-elements-melting-into-the-new-ingredients, or from the World assimilating to White America to White America assimilating to the World. The US now looks like hapless Uncle Sam surrounded by a gang of gypsies pickpocketing him from every angle.

If you have something of low value, you need not worry much about keeping it. I don’t think the Congo has to worry much about being inundated with mass immigration from Asia, Latin America, Middle East, and other parts of Africa. But if you have something of high value(like Denmark), you better have a powerful contract or covenant with it on the basis of legality, politics, and passion because OTHERS will try to take it from you. If you don’t stake it, others will take it.

Israel and Sweden are nice nations. So, black Africans head to both. Israelis knows black Africans are coming to take from them, so they build walls and invoke the special covenant between themselves and the land based on race, history, culture, and morality. The covenant moralizes the Jewish national defense of Israel.
In contrast, dumb Swedes listened to weasels like Barbara Specters and removed the stakes holding down their national tent. Because Swedish national ideology has been de-covenantized, it’s considered immoral for Swedes to defend what they got and considered moral for foreigners to invade and take from Swedes. It’s a case of ‘Inversal’ values where morality has been turned upside down.
Without grounding with patriotic stakes, Swedish tent is blowing in the wind. Nice places come under heavy pressure of migratory winds. This is why nice civilizations always built walls to keep out the barbarians.
Just like a house will fall apart if all the nails are pulled out, a nation(esp a nice nation) cannot hold together without a contract/covenant that hammers down ownership to a people based on race, culture, and history.

Ilhan Omar vs Jewish Power — Jewish Sun and its POC planets against the White Sun — Jewish use of White Janissary and POC Mercenaries

COTF(Coalition of the Fringes) is really a Judeo-Centrism. It's not about equality among minority groups but about non-Jewish minority planets revolving around the sun of Jewish Power. Notice that neither Charles Blow nor Sarah Jeong says anything much about Jewish Power or Zionist Occupation of West Bank. They are colored planets around the Jewish sun. And Ilhan Omar the Somali Congressman from Minnesota was meant to be a planet too. Jewish solaristics say, "White Sun bad, so color planets should revolve around Jewish Sun to fight evil white sun." Omar's sin was she suggested at Islamo-centrism. Instead of being a dutiful planet revolving around the Jewish sun, her truth sees Islamism as the core truth, the real sun. This messes up the gravitational laws of Jewish solaristics. For most blacks, Asians, Hindus, and Mexicans, what Jews are doing to Palestinians and Arabs doesn't really matter. They have no personal or tribal dog in the fight. So, they figure on playing the game and moving up the ladder by revolving around the Jewish sun that hogs the light and power. But Muslims do have a dog in the fight because so much of Muslim Consciousness has been about 'Evil Zionists crush Palestinians and attack Arab/Muslim nations'. Indeed, Muslim media and propaganda in Africa and Middle East are as anti-Zionist as Jewish-dominated Media in the US are anti-white. Muslims grow up inhaling this stuff as The Truth, just like PC-addled people in the US inhale anti-white-ism.

Another problem with Jewish solaristics is that the Evil White Sun also revolves around it now. Jews vilify whites the most, but whites make the biggest stink about how much they love Jews and Israel. Jews need this white support for Israel but also find it troublesome because it associates Jewish power with 'white racism'. If white sun is so evil and must be opposed by Jewish sun and its loyal color planets, why is it revolving around the Jewish sun and praising it?

It used to be Anglo-American Sun was at the center of America. And initially, Jews were an ethnic planet that revolved around the Anglo-American Sun... as did other ethnic-planets. But then, Jewish planet got radioactive and began to generate its own heat and became another sun. So, America became the ever-expanding Jewish sun revolving around the ever-dimming Anglo-American sun. But it's unstable for a solar system to have two suns. Should Jewish sun keep revolving around Anglo-American sun, or should Anglo-American sun begin to revolve around the Jewish sun? Anglo-centrism or Judeo-centrism? Around the time Cold War ended, the White sun began to revolve around the Jewish sun. US went from sentimentalizing the UK as special motherland to regarding Israel as its 'greatest ally'. US dropped the 'racism' of favoritism for Northern Europe and took up the 'progressivism' of favoritism for Israel. Why is favoring Jews over Palestinians a form of 'progressivism' than 'racism'? You got me. I guess control of the Word trumps the way of the World.

But Jewish Power was still not content with the White Sun revolving around the Jewish sun. As long as the White sun remains a sun, it challenges the mono-supremacy of the Jewish sun. It is typical Jewish mentality rooted in ancient habits: Jewish God is the only god, all other gods are false. So, Jewish sun is the only sun, and there shall be no other sun. Jewish sun power came from elite control of institutions and industry. As whites lost those areas to Jews, white solar power resided mainly in numbers. Whites were still the majority. Jews had quality sun power, whites had quantity sun power. So, Jews figured even THAT must be destroyed. If whites were to lose majority power, they will no longer constitute a sun and become just a planet wholly dependent on Jewish sun for light and sustenance. It will have no auto-generative power. Donald Trump won in 2016 purely due to quantity power. As virtually all the elite institutions and industries(even on the establishment 'right') were against Trump, he had only white populism to rely on. If white quantity power goes, white power got nothing. Whites will lose sun status and be just another planet.

Anyway, in the Jewish attack on white power, it needed Janissary and mercenaries. Jews may have elite power, but that is never enough. Just like generals need soldiers, Jews need the numbers. As they don't have it themselves, they gain numbers by the Janissary way and mercenary way. Janissary are white people brainwashed by PC to hate their own kind. Turks did this with Greek and Slavic boys. Ottoman empire scoured Christian areas under its control and conscripted the healthiest, strongest, and most intelligent boys. These Christian boys were trained in Islamic military academies and converted and trained to be rabid and virulent enemies of Christendom. Jewish power has done this to so many white kids via academia(for elite white kids) and idolatry(for white masses who become addicted to rap music, jungle fever, and Hollywood movies where white heroes are those who happily fight Wars for Israel or hate Russia). But Janissary whites weren't enough for Jews. So, Jews used immigration to recruit mercenaries. These non-whites are essentially bribed by Jews with tickets to the US. With tickets not only for themselves but for their relatives and their relatives and etc. As these people realize that their continued passage to white wealth depends on Jewish power and suppression of White American nationalism, they work with Jews even though they feel no love for Jews(and may even resent them). In politics, the choice is often not between what-we-love and what-we-hate but between what-we-hate and what-we-hate-more. It's like Jews side with Neo-Nazis in Ukraine because they hate Russia even more. It's like Saudis side with Israel because they hate Iran even more. So, when whites try to convince Jews to oppose non-white immigration because POC immigrants hate Jews, Jews scoff at the notion because they know non-whites can be made to hate whites even more, thereby siding with Jews. If non-whites hate Jews but hate whites even more for being a bigger obstacle to non-white immigration-invasion of the West, they will side with Jews who are at least letting them in as the New Ellisians.

AIPAC Jews are bitter about Ilhan Omar because she's supposed to be a good mercenary but isn't. Jews support the 'Muslim refugees' and make a big fuss about it for all the world to hear: "We Jews spend big money to bring you guys in to the West against the will of 'racist' white Nazi America." Basically, it means "We pay you to side with us against white people." Most non-whites, wink-wink, understand and play along. Take the Latin-American film-makers in Hollywood. They know who really controls the Film Industry. They know all about Jewish Power. But, because Jewish power is more welcoming of their kind while white America is more resistant, they play at being loyal mercenaries to the Tribe.

But things may be different with Muslims. Islam, unlike Christianity, lacks a soft side. It is militant and proud, just like Jewishness. It has its own kind of chutzpah. Also, Muslims lack 'white guilt' and, as members of POC, have been characterized as 'victims'. Indeed, Jews have been feeding this narrative, not least because 'Muslims as victims of white supremacism' is a convenient smokescreen for the reality of 'Muslims as victims of Wars for Israel pushed by AIPAC'. HAW or Hate-against-White is the glue that holds Jews and POC together.
In contrast, Jews count as whites, indeed so much so that Jews can conveniently repackage Jewish privilege as 'white privilege'. Also, because of the Palestinian issue, both the 'far left' and 'far right' sometimes use Muslims as a proxy against Jewish power. If it's taboo and 'antisemitic' for whites to criticize Jews, it's more complicated when Palestinians and Arabs do it because it is a fact that Zionism oppresses Palestinians and pushes for more Wars for Israel.
Also, white Janissary become awfully confused when it's Jews vs Muslims. Jewish-controlled PC instilled white Janissary with the simple moral formula of "whites bad, non-whites good." So, whom are white Janissary supposed to side with when it's white Jews vs non-white Muslims? Their NPC programming starts to go haywire. No wonder Jews try to distract everyone from all this with 'Gays are Holy'. Omar is either an idiot or savant -- or idiot savant -- when she invoked the tranny business to get some heat off her. She is learning. https://twitter.com/Ilhan/status/1092821831977975808

So, Muslims are troublesome mercenaries for Jews. Besides, Islam is powerful stuff. It has its own solar will to be the center of the world. Even if Muslims may never achieve political or economic mastery, they feel as the spiritual masters of the world. This is why Muslim nations have been more difficult to bend to the will of the West than, say, the East or Latin America. Japan and Latin American nations are awash with 'gay' stuff, but it's almost non-existent in Muslim nations. Pagan Japan and post-Christian Latin America have no core conviction, no sense of eternal or perennial truth. It's all about the fashion and what-is-hot, and that means mindless imitation of the biggest power in the world, the US. The Now is Wow.
In contrast, Muslims always put Faith at the center, just like Jews always put the Covenant at the center. So between Jews and Muslims, it's Core conviction vs Core conviction. Furthermore, Jews can't manipulate Muslims because the latter doesn't have a guilt complex the way Christians do. Muhammad was an unapologetic warrior, not a turn-the-other-cheek saint. So, while Jews could point to how Christians preached one thing but practiced another, they can't pull this trick on Muslims who believe their violence was sanctioned by Allah.

So, the current Jews vs Muslims battle resembles Romans vs Jews in the ancient world. Romans had the military might but they couldn't crush the will of Jews. And Muslims have the kind of will that cannot be crushed, not even with the full might of US and its Pax Judeo-Americana. In the end, profits can't beat the prophets, and Muslims have prophetic confidence.

Commentary on "Heart of Darkness Germany"(by Linh Dinh) -- Jewish Supremacist War on Germany and Goy Nations

https://www.unz.com/ldinh/heart-of-darkness-germany/

After Muslim congresswoman Ilhan Omar made an obvious point about Jewish power influencing American foreign policies, she was forced, by that same Jewish power, to recant, thus confirming, to all those who can still think, the awful influence of Jewish power.

ROTFL. Same happened with Chuck Hagel hearing. It was as hilarious as it was humiliating.



Maybe Jewish Power figures, paradoxically enough, that it will be ‘noticed’ LESS if it is brazenly out in the open. After awhile, people may just get ‘used to it’, even endeared to it as the New Normal. Imagine you have a spacious room, but suppose a bomb drops from the sky, falls through the roof, and sits in the room without exploding. You are told there is nothing that can be done about it. Indeed, trying to remove the bomb may set it off and then kaboom! So, you must accept its presence and work around it. Day in and day out, you grow accustomed to it, and it becomes regarded as part of the room. You hardly notice it because it’s always there. After awhile, you get so used to it that you can’t imagine your room without it. Eventually, if someone says there is a nasty bomb in your room, you get all triggered and denounce him for casting negative aspersions toward something that is so essential to what makes the room so special.

Maybe when something is made so ubiquitous, people not only get used to it but inured and 'habitualized' to it, indeed to the point where the they cannot conceive of normality without it. It’s like the changes in a society's response to the building of a dam that profoundly transforms the environment. There is the initial shock and disgust, the sense that it is a crime against nature, what with the flooding destroying so many plants and animals. But over time, a new flora and fauna grow around the water, and people become accustomed to the new reality. The dam, which had been denounced, has become essential to the new reality. People now defend it and oppose destroying the dam to restore the original landscape.

Or consider the pre-modern Chinese who were forced to wear queues(aka pigtails) as a sign of submission to the Manchu invaders. The draconian policy was to humiliate and subjugate the Chinese. But over time, Chinese got so used to the queues as a part of their image and style that, when the moment finally arrived to cut them off in defiance to the waning Manchus, many Chinese felt hesitant. As queues had become a part of Chinese culture for generations, many felt trepidation about discarding the 'tradition'.

Well, it now seems like all these White Cucks of Zion in the US have become accustomed to wearing their Jew-queues or Jueues.



There are no scientific or even documentary proofs of the Holocaust, so the six million figure is just as much nonsense as the human skin lampshades and human fat soap.

There are lots of lies and fabrications and tall tales about the Holocaust. And 6 million figure is almost certainly false. But there are mountains of evidence that Germans committed mass killings, esp in the Eastern Front, and many victims were Jews(though most were killed by bullets than gas). David Cole is probably right that around 3 million Jews were killed. So, while Jewish Power has grown corrupt and crazy of late, there is no sense denying the reality. It’s like Chinese may yet grow arrogant and dangerous, but there is no sense belittling Japanese atrocities in China that were all-too-real(though often exaggerated in sensationalist accounts of the Nanking Massacre).

Linh Dinh should be careful about pushing in the other direction too far. After all, he’s Vietnamese, member of the Tribe that was butchered in millions by US war machine. If the US, which stood for democracy and freedom, could commit industrial slaughter on such a massive scale, imagine what the Nazi War Machine would have been capable of in the East. Nazis were brazenly ethno-supremacist and felt justified in expending countless Slavic and Jewish lives to fulfill their dream of empire. So, the mass killings of Jews and Slavs were no myth. If Holocaust is a total myth, then Slavocaust must be too. In fact, Nazis committed both on a massive scale in the East.

The great irony is that Jewish globalist imperialists have become a bunch of Judeo-Nazis. Their attitude is hardly distinguishable from that of historical Nazis. They believe any number of Arab, Muslim, Iranian, and white Christian lives should be sacrificed to actualize the dream of the 1000 yr Judeo-Reich. Just look at the state of Ukraine and Middle East because of the influence of Judeo-Nazism. Entire areas look like Poland during WWII. Or consider the white death by Opioids(peddled by the sinister Sackler Family), which is reminiscent of the impact of the Jewish monopoly of opium trade in China.

For several years, I’ve posted reports from a German friend, describing his country in crisis, so below is his latest. Burdened by Holocaust guilts, Germans are shamed into accepting millions of refugees, many of whom are Muslims fleeing from wars triggered by Jewish power.

Germany was reasonably sane until the end of the Cold War. For example, it still had blood-based citizenship. And there was moderate pride in having overcome its dark past. Also, West Germany was much praised as a model for all of Europe, not least for East Germany that lagged under Soviet rule.

As long as the Soviet Union remained a threat, there was a limit to guilt-baiting Germany and spreading the ‘poz’ to weaken Europe in general. Europe had to remain moderately stable and secure to keep the Soviets at bay. But once the Soviet Empire collapsed, a new set of priorities came into play(as devised by New World Order).
At the same time, a most profound shift in the reins-of-power was finalized in the US, the boss over Europe. The US went from Anglo-elite rule to Jewish-elite rule. Why was this significant? Even though Anglo-America and Germany had fought bitterly in World War II, white Christian-Americans and white Christian-Germans were willing to bury the hatchet and work together for a better future for both sides. A movie like ENEMY BELOW(where Germans are portrayed as men than monsters) would be unthinkable today(when hysterical Jews label ANYTHING as 'nazi' or 'far right').



Vengeful Jews resented the rapprochement between White America and Germany following the war, but they couldn’t do anything about it because the top power back then was with the Wasps. In those days, even Liberal Wasps were more conservative than Conservatives today(who embrace ‘gay marriage’ and all forms of sappy cuckery). Indeed, nationalism was seen generally as a good thing during most of the Cold War. Both the new right and new left defended nationalism against imperialism. Soviets and the Left supported Cuban and Vietnamese nationalism against the US empire, and in turn the US supported Polish and Hungarian nationalism against Soviet Empire. And both the US and USSR sought to win hearts and minds in the Third World by supporting nationalism against fading European imperialism. Also, following WWII, much of Europe, both West and East, was reordered along nationalist lines, sometimes involving mass relocation of peoples, such as expulsion of Ost-Germans from Poland and other places. Such policies led to greater homogeneity and national consciousness. As for Imperial European nations like France, Great Britain, and Netherlands, the loss of empire left them with nothing but nationalism.

Even if there developed a school of thought that saw nationalism as deeply problematic, the fact is both US and USSR were fine with moderate nationalism around the world. But with the fall of the Soviet Union and with the triumph of the US as the sole superpower, mindsets began to change. The change owed especially to the Jewish takeover of the US. Perhaps if Wasps had retained power and kept Jews at bay, the US would have been more accommodating of other nations and systems. But with Jews at the helm, the lone superpower went into hyperdrive against all nationalisms(except that of Israel of course). Granted, Jewish-ruled US cynically supported particular nationalisms for political opportunism: Stoking ethnic hatreds in Yugoslavia, inciting anti-Russian animus in Georgia and Ukraine.

The reason for Jewish eagerness to weaken goy nationalism had to do with the nature of Jewish Power. Jews have very little national power. Their power is essentially globo-hegemonic: More about Jewish networking around the world than about unity of national elites and national masses. People say Israel is so powerful, but its influence depends utterly on the far greater power and wealth of Jews in US, EU, Russia, Latin America, and etc. It is globo-Jewish networking and coordination of power that favors Israel for special treatment.

Now, if Jews had a gigantic nation of their own, they might be more tolerant of nationalism as a general principle. Suppose Israel or some Jewish-majority nation were the size of Russia, China, or India. Or even Iran. Jews might feel secure in their impressive national power of great land mass, abundant natural resources, and large population. But the only national power that Jews have is Israel. Israel is an advanced affluent nation but ain’t much on its own. It’s like Britain as a GREAT POWER depended on its imperial expanse. Without the empire, Great Britain could be well-off and a nice nation but NOT a great WORLD power. In contrast, the US, China, or Russia can be great powers even without control of foreign territory. They have land, population, and resources all on their own. Because Jewish World Power depends on networking and maintaining control of key goy-majority nations and peoples, it must declaw and neuter them of nationalism(that may well awaken goy identity and interests against those of Jews). Now, Jews, as a Normal People, could have it pretty good without imperialist hegemony over other nations, BUT Jews are now addicted to supremacism(just like Brits got and Japanese were once addicted to empire). It’s like the ring in LORD OF THE RINGS. Once one tastes power, it’s hard to let go. Just like Germany-as-normal-nation was too humdrum for the Nazis, Jews-as-normal-people is too boring for Jewish globo-supremacists who must have it all.

The triumph of Jewish Supremacist power is why the world really began to change after the Cold War. With control of media, finance, academia, law, and deep state, Jews pushed the New Globalist Narrative on all the world. (Globalism differed from internationalism, which was about sovereign nations respecting and cooperating with one another. Globalism demanded the surrender of national sovereignty for all nations except Israel.)
We know about the fall of the Soviet Union but no less monumental was the fall of Wasp rule in the US around the same time. Ethic Coups took place in both US and Russia in the 90s. Because of the Rule of Law in the more stable US, Jews were able to manage the takeover more smoothly and efficiently over here. In contrast, the relative lack of Rule of Law in Russia was both a great boon and bane for Jews. It made for a great opportunity to steal and rob over thereas fast as possible in the decade of Shock Doctrine or Shylock Doctrine. Jews could steal more and faster in Russia of 90s than anywhere else in the world. But precisely because Russia was without Rule of Law, Vladimir Putin and FSB national-gangsters could move against Jewish globo-gangsters in the style of THE GODFATHER. Just like Adolf Hitler chewed more than he could swallow in the invasion of Russia, overeager Jews tried to swallow all of Russia in one big gulp but ended up puking all over(just like Cronus in his plan to devour his children).

Still, Jews checkmated for total power in the US and its puppet EU. As most white people lack prophetic will, they rely on the Official Power for permission on what is what. Jews are like adults and big-thinkers. Whites are like children and students. (Whites are to Jews what Asians are to whites. Mental Dogs.) Also, because the West had elevated Shoah into a secular faith, white people came to look upon Jews as sages, saints, and wisemen. For most of post-war period, such philosemitic sentimentality was less harmful because Jews didn’t have dominance over US and EU. It’s like we can be sentimental about American Indians as ‘noble savages’ without negative consequences because Indians do not and will never have control over us. But by the time the Cold War ended, Jews had amassed immense power and grown arrogant & megalomaniacal. They were the new supremacist-imperialists. But because whites had been indoctrinated with Holocaust Cult for couple of decades, they absorbed every Jewish word as the holiest wisdom or most brilliant insight. Of course, devious Jews were only too happy to oblige goy expectations(though originally concocted by the Jew-run media) and role-play as wisemen and sages and tragic victims. But in fact, George Soros and others of his kind weren’t trying to spread human rights and progress. They were trying to mentally, politically, and financially enslave goyim so that the globo-homo supremacists could rule over them-as-sheeple. But because whites had become enamored of Jews as the Holy Holocaust people, they earnestly lent their ear to every Jewish advice, no matter how ridiculous.
And Jews didn’t just direct agenda this at Germany but at ALL goy nations. Consider how the UK(the proud victor in WWII) is just as far gone as Germany and for similar reasons. London is now majority non-white, and its upcoming ‘conservative’ candidate for mayor is a black guy running against the current Muslim, the Pakistani Sadiq Khan. There is no greater sin in the UK than 'racism' and 'antisemitism'. Sweden and Norway had NOTHING to do with WWII -- if anything, Norway was occupied by Germany -- , but they are just as far as suicidal and self-loathing as Germany. Or, if there is pride, it is about demonstrating virtue via national/racial suicide. Indeed, Jews rigged the Narrative so that all of Europe is deemed more-or-less equally responsible of WWII and Shoah. If Germans must lose their nation to atone for WWII, others must lose their nations to demonstrate they are morally superior to Germans. In any case, both Germans and other Europeans must prove that they are oh-so-good in the eyes of Jews. Moral logic and values flow from the main premise, and the current premise is, "Holocaust is the greatest crime of all time, Holocaust = 'racism', and 'racism' = 'xenophobia'. So, if you oppose mass migration-invasion, you are 'xenophobic' = 'racist' = Nazi = pro-Holocaust." Unless Europeans reject this insane premise, they are a cooked goose in the Jewish pot.

Because smaller powers usually follow the lead of bigger ones, what happens in US and UK & Germany shapes what happens in smaller European nations as well. In some ways, Sweden is even more far gone than Germany.
The fact that Jews target all goy nations — victim nations along with villain nations of WWII — goes to show that the real Jewish motive is not about War Guilt or the Holocaust. It is about Jewish Supremacist takeover and control. Poland was invaded in WWII, and its resistance heroes were nationalist. So, one might think its national consciousness would be praised and be associated with anti-Nazism. But nope, Jews say even moderate nationalism in Poland and its desire to remain Polish are ‘neo-nazi’ and ‘far right’.
Also, Jewish globo-homo pressures on Japan and South Korea are the same even though Japan was aggressor nation and Korea was ‘aggressed’ nation. The same Globo-Homo propaganda is pushed on both nations, and the result is young peoples there now consider nationalism and homogeneity to be vile notions, which is one reason why Japan and South Korea are going the way of suicidal Ireland. When the US was Anglo-Christian-ruled, moderate nationalist feelings in Europe and Asia were tolerated and even encouraged. White American Christian elites thought, “We have America, Russians have Russia, Germans have Germany, Japanese have Japan, etc.” Each people have a base nation of their own. Such formula was deemed ideal for most of the world. But Jews think differently. Even though Jews rule the US, they don’t feel, “We have America” because, after all, 98% of Americans are goyim. Jews can’t really own America because they feel no connection to goyim. Jews can only rule as elites. In contrast, when the white elites ruled, they felt a bond with the white masses. So, the unity of white elites and white masses led to a sense of national ownership, and whites respected similar sentiments in other nations. But Jews in the US only see themselves as ruling over the filthy goyim. Jewish elites feel connection not with goy masses but with fellow Jewish elites around the world. Jews fear goy nationalism because it might reignite the idea that the goy elites of a nation are supposed to represent, defend, and serve their own people… like what the Jewish elites do in Israel and what Viktor Orban is calling for in Hungary. Now, Jews are totally on-board with such arrangement in Israel but revile it in Hungary. Why? Because if national goy elites primarily connect with national goy masses, they won’t serve the super-globo-elites(the Jews). It’s like the political dynamics of Vietnam under French rule. French imperialists suppressed the idea of Vietnamese elites bonding with Vietnamese masses. They demanded that the comprador Vietnamese serve the Franco-super-elites of the great French Empire. To drive a wedge between goy elites and goy masses, Jews push for Diversity. As the US and Germany turn more diverse, the white elites are pressured to care about ALL peoples than about white people. Thus, the bond between white elites and white masses is severed. (And since it is impossible for white elites to bond with ALL the masses, they just choose to serve the Jewish elites above them.)

With Jewish rule over the US, the New Message is all goy nations must forsake nationalism, promote diversity, welcome mass immigration, and etc, the kind of crazy stuff rejected by Israel. Look how globo-homo corporate Japan is celebrating its mulatto athletes born of black men and Japanese women. Japan is total Cuckpan now. Globo-Japan is a mere puppet of the US as puppet of the Empire of Judea or EOJ.

In the end, it’s not about the Holocaust because Jewish demands on all goy nations are the same regardless of whether the nations were villains or victims in WWII. Germans were villains and Poles were victims, but notice Jews pressure both peoples to comply to globo-homo national suicide. As for the Palestinians, they had NOTHING to do with World War II in any shape or form, but notice Jewish policy on them has been no better than on Germans; if anything, it's been worse. What does that tell you? Jewish Supremacist Power will destroy and sacrifice ANY people and nation to serve Jewish supremacist interests. It’s like how the Spanish behaved in the Americas. Or how Germans and Japanese acted during WWII. The radical supremacist sickness has now passed to Jews, and it has to be stopped.

Identity-over-Ideology(esp if masked with pseudo-universalist-values) beats Ideology-over-Identity — Why did Jewish Ashkenazim prevail over Anglo-Episcopalians despite Comparable IQ? — Why Jews beat Whites on the Issue of South Africa

One of the biggest truths of modern history is that those who favor ideology-over-identity will lose to those who favor identity-over-ideology. Those who choose blood over ink will prevail over those who choose ink over blood. Now, everyone has some identity and some ideology. The question is a matter of which goes on top. Among whites, it used to be identity first, ideology second. Now, it is ideology first, identity second. Or it's idolatry first, ideology second, and identity last? Idolatry of worshiping the Holy Three of Jews, Homos, and Negroes. The ideology of DIOS or 'diversity is our strength' and 'white guilt'. And last and also the least, white identity. In contrast, Jews and blacks put identity before ideology. Also, they celebrate the idolatry of worshiping themselves over the Other. Jews elevate and disseminate the image of Jews as Holy Holocaust People and Happy Humor People. Negroes elevate and lionize themselves as the superior badass people who win in sports, pop music, fighting, and sex. Blood is stronger than ink, seed is stronger than creed.

Indeed, we can see the results of identity-over-ideology vs ideology-over-identity in recent US history(as well as in South Africa or any other part of the world). Two highly intelligent and talented groups have been Ashkenazi Jews and Anglo-Episcopalians. Studies show that both groups have equal intelligence, generally one standard deviation above the American average. Some estimates even suggest Anglo-Episcopalians may have slightly higher IQ than the Ashkenazi Jews. So, given parity in intelligence and talent, the two groups should have been neck-and-neck. Or the Anglo-Episcopalians should have had the advantage since they are Christian and share race and religion with the white majority population, among whom Anglo or Northern European stock has been prominent. But since the end of World War II, Jews kept gaining while Anglo-Episcopalians kept losing ground. Now, one reason could be personality. Maybe Jews have more a dogged, aggressive, and insistent personalities, the chutzpah thing. Or, maybe Jews were more adept at navigating through modernity due to greater(and more shameless) familiarity with strangeness, and indeed, the 20th century was a very strange era with so many upheavals and transformations. Due to their long history as a nomadic people who developed Zelig-ish and Houdini-like means to adapt to different nations and cultures, all the while maintaining a strong and resilient sense of tribal continuity and identity, Jews were perhaps more 'creative' in the way they played the game of modernity. After all, if there are two boxers of equal speed and ability but one is rather stiff while other is fluid, the latter will have the advantage. Shamelessness was part of the fluidity that allowed Jews to take control of vice industries that, though disreputable(at least initially), made Jews a lot of money in stuff like gambling and pornography. Also, this strange fluidity served Jewish Identity well because hostile identity had to be camouflaged with hopeful ideology. Jews couldn't have won over goyim if they'd insisted on their identity alone. Imagine if Jews said, "We are so proud to be Jewish and want you goyim to do the bidding of us Jews." Even the biggest Philo-Semites would have been offended by such presumption and arrogance. So, Jews cleverly sought power by spouting ideological talking points about 'justice', 'equality', 'progress', 'universal values', 'human rights', 'proposition nation', 'fighting hate', 'diversity', 'tolerance', and etc. By pushing such ideological themes, Jews created the impression that human progress depends on peoples all over the world suppressing their particular identities to welcome the one-and-only universal ideology. After all, identity is rooted and tangible whereas ideology is rootless and abstract. You can't immediately transform someone to another national identity(nor would you want to, that is if you want to maintain the integrity of identity), but you can quickly convert anyone to your beliefs and values.
Now, if Jewish Power led the charge with identity, goyim would have countered with their own identities. If Jews say, "We are Jewish, we are proud, and we work for Jewish power!", then goyim such as Poles would have countered with "We are Polish, we are Catholic, we are proud, and we work for Polish power!" Therefore, Jews decided to charge with ideology than identity. Jews said, "We are for justice and progress based on 'western values' and universal human rights, and if you oppose us, you're a bunch of 'racists', 'supremacists', 'xenophobes', and probably 'anti-Semites' too." This had a disarming effect on the goyim. After all, if Jews claim such noble neo-Christo-visions of bringing all of humanity under one umbrella of justice, tolerance, and understanding, why should any people say NO?
In truth, however, Jews weren't charging with ideology to serve ideology above all else. They were charging with ideology to smash goy identity so that Jewish identity could squeeze through the barriers and score the touchdown to win the game. In football, the offensive linemen do not smash into defensive linemen to score touchdowns. The offensive linemen rarely get to handle the ball. Their only role is to defend the quarterback and/or open up holes for the running back to slip through. And this is the game that Jews have been playing. They used the force of ideology as offensive linemen so that the ball of Jewish identity handled by the quarterback/runningback would slip through and score the touchdown. So, in the end, the elite competition in the US after WWII was not about Jewish commitment to ideology vs Anglo-Episcopalian commitment to ideology. It was Jewish commitment to ideology masked with ideology vs Anglo-Episcopalian commitment to ideology over identity. Well, guess who won that game? Increasingly, Anglo-elites lost their sense of identity. They even came to regard it as evil and wicked. This spread not only among Anglo-elites in the US but spread to the UK where the elites now celebrate the fact that UK will be overrun with Africans and Muslims. (To be sure, white elites seek to preserve their own status and privilege, so they don't really practice the ideology they preach. But unlike Jews, they are not using ideology as cover for identity. Rather, they use ideology to have immunity. Sticking with PC talking points buys them some protection from criticism.) Anglo-elites have chosen ideology(and immunity) over identity... without realizing that Jews pushed the toxic ideology that is now poisoning the West in order to favor Jewish identity above all else. Jews didn't push ideology over all identities. They pushed ideology only against goy identities to make space for Jewish identity(that got passover rights). So, while Anglo-American elites in US and Anglo-British elites in UK have been pissing away their land, legacy, and lineage, Jewish elites the world over have been doing everything to reinforce and strengthen Israel as a Jewish State and to turn Holocaustianity as the reigning neo-religion all around the world.


Now, who knows how the world might turn out IF all groups sincerely and conscientiously committed themselves to ideology over identity. Whatever the result may be, at the very least one could say all groups acted in good faith. But reality is never one where all sides behave with utmost honesty and highest principles. After all, why does every nation have an intelligence agency that specializes in spying, stealing secrets, planting disinformation, subverting other nations though covert means, and etc? So much for mutual trust and fair play. Or look how corporations operate. Why do they get sued? Why do they have to pay fines? Because they are often caught cheating or doing stuff to gain an edge. It's always been like that and always will be. If anything, most big corporations seek monopoly power so that they won't have to deal with competition. It's the nature of power. Then, it's the same with tribes, peoples, and nations. The idea that all peoples will be equally committed to ideology-over-identity is a pipe-dream. Furthermore, even if MOST peoples do somehow manage to favor ideology-over-identity, it only takes ONE violator to mess up everything. Suppose there are 100 people, and 99 of them act fair and honest while ONE guy exploits the 'naivete' of others to steal the entire loot for himself. Just like one bad apple can spread its mold and mess up the whole barrel, one transgressor can mess up everything. This is why libertarianism never works. It assumes that all of humanity could be persuaded to behave as principled individuals who are sincerely committed to liberty and personal responsibility, but that is fairyland. Consider how all those guys on Wall Street were preaching about 'free markets' and against government regulation, but the minute their fortunes were threatened by the crash of 2008, they were the first to run to government for bailouts and protection. And notice how they used their muscle to ensure that none of them would go to jail. Talk about professional(and tribal) courtesy. Indeed, the reason why the US is so corrupt is because it came under the domination of Jews who rose in power by pushing ideology only to favor their own identity above all else. Indeed, Jews favor Jewish identity not only above goy identities but above the ideology that they pretend to espouse. What applies to other groups doesn't apply to Jews. So, the US must sanction Iran, Russia, Syria, and any nation hated by Jews, but if any conscientious people want to sanction Israel for its Occupation of West Bank and brutality in Gaza, the hell with free speech, freedom of conscience, and universal justice: Criminalize BDS. Its Juden Uber Alles. Current Israel is more further right(often in dark ways) than any European nation, but notice the Jewish-dominated media never call it 'far right' while the label is used so often to denigrate even moderate nationalist movements in Europe. So, even the slightest sign of white/European identity or Christian consciousness(the real kind as opposed to globo-homo-infected cucktianity) is 'far right'(implying connection to Nazism) while even the most hardline Zionist extremism and supremacism is merely described as 'right-wing'.
The main reason why Jews get so triggered about white goyim in EU, US, Russia, and etc. expressing the slightest concern for whites in South Africa is because such sentiments suggest at the stirrings of white identity, i.e., whites coming to realize that they must choose identity-over-ideology for the survival and well-being of their race. Jews want identity-over-ideology only for themselves. Indeed, Jewish-dominated media even try to suppress it among black Africans. While the globohomo media have no problem with Jews doing everything possible to keep Israel predominantly Jewish, they have lambasted black South Africans for trying to stem the tide of migration-invasion from neighboring African nations like Zimbabwe(with economy worse than South Africa's due to total black rule or misrule). Jews fear that if whites favor identity-over-ideology, whites will come to favor their own identity over any other. And that means whites will put their own racial pride and racial interests above those of Jews. If that happens, Jewish Supremacism and globohomo hegemony could well end sooner than later. The utter hypocrisy of Jews is most evident in their reaction to white favoring of Jewish identity over goyim, white or otherwise. If Jews are indeed disdainful of identity(as tribal , dangerous, and obsolete), why are they so happy to see so many white people pledging their support to Jews and Israel? Isn't Jewishness an identity and isn't Israel an identitarian-state? For whites to favor Jews means favoring one identity over another. e.g. Zionists over Palestinians. If the politics of identity is so toxic and if Jews insist that whites must forsake their own racial identity, why do they also insist that whites must extol Jewish/Zionist identity and do everything in the world to serve and defend it? Why should whites favor Jews over Palestinians? Why should whites favor Israel over Syria or Iran? Why should whites favor economic sanctions on any people, nation, or group hated by Jews -- consider the sanctions on Russia, Syria, Iran, Venezuela, Palestinians, Christians who won't bend over to Homomania, white identitarians like Jared Taylor who are denied Twitter and Paypal, and etc. -- while showering Israel with billions in 'aid' every year? Why should whites get all worked up over non-existent nukes in Iran while overlooking the nukes in Israel built with uranium stolen from the US? But then, Jewish logic would have us believe that actual Jewish communist spies and subversives in the 40s and 50s were innocent victims of the McCarthyite 'witchhunt' whereas Trump and his associates are guilty of 'Russia Collusion' even though there isn't a shred of evidence and the 'evidence', as such exists, was fabricate by goons hired by the Hillary Campaign and the Deep State. Jews often deflect criticism by invoking the concept of Protected Groups. Because Jews have defined themselves as the Holy Holocaust people, they insist on Protected Status. Perversely, such protection has led to Jews becoming the New Nazis or Judeo-Nazis. It's one thing to offer special protection to weak and helpless groups. After all, it makes sense to offer protection to few remaining tigers in their natural habitat. But if tigers were plentiful and prowling the streets to devour people, should they be protected? Maybe it made sense to offer protection to the badly wounded Jewish tiger after WWII, but today, the Jewish Tiger is the apex predator, and protected status for such power is dangerous for all of humanity. Just ask the Palestinians, Russians, Syrians, Iranians, white Christians, Libyans, white Europeans, Arabs, Muslims, etc. Or, consider the twisted logic when it comes to Jews and Muslims. Jews say Muslims need to be protected in the West due to 'Islamophobia', but it was Jewish Hollywood that made all those movies that portrayed Arabs and Muslims as subhuman scum terrorists. Furthermore, the biggest tragedies that befell the Muslim World since the End of the Cold War have been due to Wars for Israel steered by Jewish Neocons and Neolibs. So, Jewish Power has done tremendous harm to Arabs and Muslims. And yet, Jewish idea of Protected Status for Muslims and Arabs has NOTHING to do with what Jewish Power is doing to those people. Rather, it's about protecting Muslims from Donald Trump and his supporters who, if anything, are more likely to oppose further Wars for Israel and want to bring US troops from the Middle East. The concept of Protected Groups has rendered justice meaningless when it comes to Jewish-and-Arab relations. If, as Jews insist, Jews and Arabs/Muslims both deserve special protection, what are we to do when Arabs/Muslims need protection from Jewish Power? After all, isn't BDS a movement that calls for special protection for the much beleaguered Palestinians from Zionist-imperialist-supremacism? But, because Jews are also protected or more-protected-than-others, Jewish greed takes precedence over Palestinian needs. The end result is the Protected Supremacism of the Jews who, posing as Eternal Holy Holocaust People, get to justify all their nasty deeds by pretending to be a 'victim group' in this day and age. Imagine Nazi Germany invading Poland and then trying to silence all international opposition by claiming Protected Status for Germany. Nazi Germany and Judeo-Nazis both demonstrate how the Cult of Victimhood can blind so many to their victimization of Others. Because so many Germans felt that their nation got a raw deal at Versailles and suffered so much during the interwar period, they regarded themselves as righteous victims righting wrongs even though they were doing wrongs to other people. And because Jews rationalize everything through the prism of 'Munich' and destroying 'new hitlers', they are blind to how they've become the new hitlers.

Identity-over-ideology will always beat ideology-over-identity. The recent history of Jews vs Anglo-Episcopalians bear this out. And it explains why Israel is proud and has healthy birthrates while Scandinavian nations are browbeaten and have low birthrates; it's because Israeli Jews put identity over ideology whereas the Scandies put ideology over identity.
Now, this doesn't mean that a people should be all about identity and no ideology. "My country right or wrong" is a terrible idea. There must be a constant effort toward shared principles of fair play, justice, and mutuality among nations, peoples, and cultures, just like individuals mustn't think in terms of 'myself uber alles'. If you did something, you need to pay the price. Even so, to an individual, his own survival and well-being come first(as long as he doesn't maliciously harm others). To a nation or people, their survival or well-being comes first. As long as a nation or people acknowledge the right of other nations and peoples to feel and act likewise, there should be no problem. The problem with Jewish Power is not universal nationalism, which is a sound idea. The problem is mono-nationalism whereby Jews and Only Jews get to enjoy the rights of nationalism while all other peoples must forsake their own nationalism mainly so that Jewish hegemonic power can systematically penetrate their nations and take control, especially with the aid of globo-homo 'gay' collaborators of every nation. (Homos around the world collaborate with Jewish Power because the spread of Jewish supremacism means homo-favoritism.) Even as Jews tell goyim to abandon their identity, Jews not only cling to theirs but practice what is essentially 'my country right or wrong'. Jewish mono-nationalism isn't a fair kind of nationalism but a gangster-nationalism where the politics of Jewish Identity is above the law and beyond reproach. Zionists occupying West Bank? Israel aiding terrorists in Syria? Wars for Israel turning millions of Arabs/Muslims into homeless nomads? Whatever happens, never blame Jews. Even though Israel is aggressor against Syria, the cuck-puppets in the media yammer about how ISRAEL needs to be protected from Syria. It's all so surreal, so very strange and Kafkaesque, but then, Jews are masters of strangeness. Ironically, Jews have become like the Nazis who were into 'my country right or wrong' mentality. Now, if Nazi Germans and Globo-Zionists were without power, it wouldn't matter what they think. But because Nazi Germany was a great power, its arrogance and supremacist lunacy brought the world to the brink. And now, Jewish globo-homo hegemonic power is doing much the same, spreading filth, hate, and lies all over. In some ways, Jewish globo-homo lunacy is more dangerous than Nazi lunacy because, at the very least, the Nazis were honest and forthright about their arrogance, contempt, and supremacism. Even those who admired certain aspects of National Socialism could see that it was led by real a**holes. Jewish supremacist are also monsters but notice how they pretend to be human-rightists, liberal-democracists, universal-valueists, diversitists, and etc. But boil down the Jewish stew to its essentials, and remaining salts in the pot taste like Kosher Supremacism.

Now, there is a better kind of nationalism. A tempered and moderate one where a nation, people, and culture prioritize their survival, preservation, and well-being all the while rejecting the arrogant mentality of 'my country right or wrong'. Thus, if that nation or people are known to have done something wrong, they fess up and make amends. It's like if your son commits a crime, it is only right that he should pay a fine or do time in jail. But that doesn't mean he's not your son. After serving time, you still favor him and try to help him because he's part of the family. It was this kind of nationalism that prevailed for a time after WWII. Germany and Japan were made to admit their wrongs and paid a heavy price. But they were allowed to survive and take care of their own interests. Their nationalism was okay as long as it respected the nationalisms of other peoples. Back then, the US and Europe were ruled by genuine nationalist leaders who felt a strong bond with their own folks, culture, and history.
But ever since Jews gained supremacist power in the US(that controls so much of the world through money, hard power, and soft power), the ideological coding of the West has been altered so that its goy elites would not only favor ideology over identity but abort even the mere thought of white identity within the white womb. And yet, this ideology was bogus because it wasn't molded out of good will and reciprocity but to dupe goyim into dropping their own identities so that Jewish identity could slip through the weakened cracks to make the touchdown and win the superbowl of Global Power. It's like Jews want whites to surrender their guns so that Jewish-controlled institutions will monopolize all the firepower. At this point, trusting Jewish Power is like trusting a fox in a henhouse. Tails I win, heads you lose. Maybe, it needn't have been this way IF Jews, as the new elites, favored 'what is good for American people' over 'what is good for Jewish supremacism'? It need not have been a zero-sum game. But as the new elites, Jews never felt much fondness or connection with the non-Jewish majority and just focused on increasing diversity to make goyim-fight-goyim while they grab more of the loot.

People need ideology because identity alone isn't enough. But ideology must serve or revolve around identity. Just like Earth revolves around the Sun, ideology must revolve around identity. A people must be identocentric than ideocentric, just like true astronomy is Helio-centric than Geo-centric. Those who choose to be ideo-centrists will surely lose to those who choose to be idento-centrists(while feigning as ideo-centrists). That is the history of Ashkenazi Jews vs Anglo-Episcopalians since the end of World War II. So... which side won and why? Just do the political math.
And in South Africa, why are things getting worse for white Afrikaners while it's looking so up and up for Jewish super-capitalists? Jews all over the world, in the spirit of identitarianism, stick up for Monopoly-Capitalist Jews in South Africa. In contrast, whites all over the world have been made to feel that it's 'racist' and 'white supremacist' to care about white women being raped and white children being beaten to a pulp by blacks in South Africa.