Andreanics triggers Dorklords like Jack Dorsey who Grovel at the Feet of Jewish-Supremacist ADL & SPLC. No Wonder then that Andreanics has been Banned from Twitter.

Dorklords of Twitter simply can't handle the truth. Hip-dipster Jack Dorsey and his NPC drones are either craven cucks or indoctrinated bots. They betray principles for super-status or wallow in PC delusions of proggy grandeur. Then, it is hardly surprising that the Twitter-sphere cannot tolerate the cold hard truths of Andreanics. Following are some of the posts that got Andreanics banned in record time.

On Amazon's 'Europhobic' Book Banning — White Liberation/Emancipation from Jewish Supremacist Tyranny is possible only by way of Identification with Palestinian Plight in West Bank — Just like Trump flipped ‘Fake News’ on his enemies, Whites must do the same with ‘Hate Speech’, e.g. accuse Jewish Supremacism of the ultimate Hate Speech and Hate Acts

https://www.amren.com/commentary/2019/02/amazon-and-the-end-of-free-speech/

The internet giant’s new wave of censorship.
White Identity by Jared Taylor has just been delisted by Amazon. Like most cases of this kind, the digital book burning was in response to a hit piece. An article from Quartz called “There’s a disturbing amount of neo-Nazi and white supremacist material on Amazon” frothed about White Identity and other titles. The piece was headlined by a picture of a flaming swastika and a group of people performing the stiff-armed salute.

The article recycles the usual silliness, claiming Mr. Taylor is a “white supremacist who has earned a place in the Southern Poverty Law Center’s ‘Extremist Files.’” But the most “extreme” quote Quartz could find from the book was a warning to whites: “If they do not defend their interests they will be marginalized by groups that do not hesitate to assert themselves, numerically and culturally.” The fact that White Identity has been banned while books championing “black power” are still on sale suggests Mr. Taylor is correct.

Another book targeted by the article—and banned by Amazon—was the The White Nationalist Manifesto by Dr. Greg Johnson, in which he “argues for ‘the right of all white peoples to self-determination.’” There is no explanation as to why this is bad or even controversial. Meanwhile, black nationalist flags and books promoting Aztlán continue to be sold.

Why did Amazon do this? ADL and SPLC are the Kosher Nostra of American Thought Police. ADL took over thought-control on Twitter and kicked off Jared Taylor. Jeff Bezos is all about money. He has no interest in anything else. So, he takes orders from ADL and SPLC(playing role of PC rabbi) to sniff out what isn't kosher. And just like Twitter, Amazon went after Taylor.

Jewish Power was behind this. Taylorism has failed. He thought that by suppressing criticism of Jewish influence, the Power would go easy on him. Nope. He was targeted even above David Duke who still has Twitter acct.

Ironically, American Renaissance has censored or deleted many comments critical of Jewish Power, perhaps in the hope that it will go easy on Taylor and Amren. It was wishful thinking. While Amren attracted some Jewish thinkers, they are utterly without influence among powerful Jews. No matter how much Taylor suppresses or discourages criticism of Jewish Power, Jewish Power will hate him because he stands for resurgence of white consciousness. Jews are now in supremacist mode, and their power depends on whites rejecting white identity and cucking to Jewish identity and interest. So, even if Taylor isn't anti-Jewish, Jews see him as a threat because he stands for whites people having their own identity and interests. That is deeply threatening to Jewish supremacist power that is nothing without white submission.

Now, this doesn't mean we should embrace crazy neo-nazi talk or KKK nonsense. I've long denounced such views and associations. But we should be vocal in calling out Jewish power, but Amren has suppressed much legitimate criticism of Jewish Power. I never spouted Neo-Nazi nonsense, but many of my comments have been deleted by Amren because they were critical of Jewish Power and Zionist hypocrisy.

Taylor suggested we use the term 'white advocacy', which sounds less confrontational than 'white nationalism' or 'white power'. It's a good term, but it misses the crucial point. In order for whites to advocate for white identity and interests, they must first liberate and emancipate themselves from tyranny. What is the nature of this tyranny? Taylor should know from his Twitter ban and difficulty in organizing conferences. ADL got him kicked off Twitter with the full backing of Jewish-controlled media and academia. And the judge threw out the case. So, mere advocacy for white interests isn't enough. Whites need something stronger. Whites need to begin with the call for White LIBERATION and White EMANCIPATION. Whites need to call for White AUTONOMY. Such terminology ennobles white politics because it implies white people, far from being masters of America, are actually indentured servants to a bigger power. Liberation and Emancipation from what? We must speak frankly. It is Jewish Power. It's not Eskimos who control the media. It's not Hawaiians who control law schools, law firms, and the courts. It's not Mexicans who control the media. It's not Muslims who control Paypal. It's not blacks who control Twitter or Amazon. Most of the Power in the US is with Jews or with white cucks who've been allowed to get rich by conforming to the Narrative. Trump slightly deviated from the Narrative, and just look at the Jewish rage directed towards him even though he's done nothing but praise Israel and Jews.

White Advocacy is all well and good, but it must follow White Liberation and White Emancipation first. First,there must be liberation from Jewish oligarchy, Jewish tyranny, Jewish ethno-monopoly of media, academia, law and courts, and deep state. And finance. Whites must boldly speak the truth that they are under the occupation of globo-homo tyranny mainly funded and led by Jewish oligarchs and commissars. Before anything is possible, a people must seek liberation and emancipation. A dog isn't going to run freely unless it breaks loose of the leash. White Liberation or Emancipation movement must name Jewish Supremacism as the main culprit. Jewish-supremacism is mono-nationalist and says only Jews and Israel are deserving of nationalism, identity, and ethnic interest. All other people, the filthy goyim, must welcome diversity and ethnic demise via endless immigration-invasion and race-mixing. Jewish power says we must all support Israel's right to be a Jewish state, but then it pressures all goy nations, Hungary or Japan, to become like Brazil.

By calling for White Liberation/Emancipation, white people will gain the moral advantage vis-a-vis Jews who can be outed as the real supremacist power in the equation. After all, so-called white privilege is NOTHING compared to Jewish privilege. Jews are 2% of the US but rule this nation, the lone superpower. Proof of Jewish-supremacism: Whereas the media tirelessly bitch about 'too many whites', they never discuss the problem of 'too many Jews' in elite institutions and industries. The implication is Jews are above criticism and can accumulate all the power and influence in the world. Meanwhile, whites must be berated endlessly for their diminishing power and wealth. Next, consider US foreign policy. It is totally geared to serve Jewish Supremacism. Israel has 300 nukes made of uranium stolen from the US, but no problem. Iran has no nukes and passed all international inspections, but it's seen as a huge problem. Israel that has illegal nukes gets billions in aid. Iran that has no nukes gets sanctioned. Also, Israel was created from mass immigration-invasion. Palestinians were pushed off their own land by waves of Jewish immigrant-invaders. And now, Jewish caravans continue to pour into West Bank to take the remaining territory. Just like Jewish power forbids Americans from protecting their borders against illegal invaders, Zionist power makes it impossible for Palestinians in West Bank to stop the endless streams of Jewish invader-settlers. A mere coincidence? Or is it because both Palestinians in West Bank and whites in the US are under the occupation of the Same Tribe?

Do we see a pattern? A double-standard? Israel can have illegal nukes but is showered with praise and billions. Iran has no nukes but is hit with sanctions. Israel continues to steal land from Palestinians, but it is rewarded with accolades and money. Palestinians lament over the loss of remaining territories in West Bank, but they are neglected or insulted by the US state and media. Even so-called 'liberal' New York Times sides with right-wing Israel over Palestinians.
Indeed, the power in the West is no longer about left vs right. After all, why does the supposedly 'leftist' Democratic Party wholly support the far-right Israel while denouncing leftist Venezuela? What the power dynamics is really about boils down to "Is it good for Jewish supremacism?" Jews hate leftist Venezuela because it is allied with Iran and Russia, and therefore the Democratic Party attacks Venezuela even though both are supposedly 'leftist'. And Democratic Party is full of praise of right-wing Israel because it's good for Jews. For Jews, it's identity over ideology, and that is why they win over whites for whom it's ideology over identity(esp due to Jewish influence in media and academia).

Jewish Power treats white Americans like it treats Iran and Palestinians. It cries out in pain as it strikes them. It's like the Crown Heights Incident in which a Jewish car ran over a black kid, but the ambulance treated the passenger than the kid. Double standard.
As things stand, it's as if Jews can never do wrong. Jews can make all the money, form monopolies, spy on the US, spread cultural degeneracy, promote racial hatred(against Muslims in Hollywood movies and against whites in TV and advertising), turn Disney into a kiddie porn factory, shut down BDS(even criminalize the movement for justice for Palestinians), and steer US toward fighting Wars for Israel that killed 100,000s of Arabs and Muslims. No problem. Jews are above the law. They can have endless AIPAC conferences that are like Nuremberg rallies. They can promote Jewish pride and make politicians pledge that US mainly exists to serve Israel uber alles.
In contrast, if white people say something as innocuous as "It's Okay to be White", lo and behold, Jewish Power has SPLC and ADL alert all the media(run by Jews) about a great 'hate crime'. Hollywood gave us 'kill whitey' movies like DJANGO UNCHAINED. Jewish-controlled Media promote endless interracist propaganda to spread jungle fever and afro-colonization-of-white-wombs. Jewish-run media sensationalize endless hate hoaxes about 'white racism' but overlook tons of real black-on-white violence. Jewish power looks upon whites as slaves. Whites better not be 'uppity'.

When Jewish Power in the US treats white people like how Zionists treat Palestinians in West Bank, isn't it time for whites to wake up and identify & empathize with Palestinians? After all, no matter how much white people praise and flatter Jews, Jews will not see whites as Honorary Fellow Jews but as White Palestinians who need to be tamed, beaten, and exploited. Sackler family made its billions by addicting whites to opioids, just like the Sassoon family(also Jewish) sold opium to the Chinese and destroyed millions of lives.

Jared Taylor can try to win the graces of Jewish Power all he wants. The fact is Jewish Power will treat him as a White Palestinian. Jewish Power is in supremacist mode and demands that white people cuck to Jews. Any mention of white identity and interests is denounced as uppity defiance against Jewish Supremacism. No matter how cordial Taylor is to Jews, Jews will see him as an 'waker' of White consciousness that may lead to white independence from Jewish supremacist control. Jewish power sees whites as a horse. The horse must obey and submit to the rider. If the horse gains independence and runs off, the rider loses a lot of advantage.

Taylor respects power and success, and Jews are powerful and successful. In contrast, Palestinians are poor, grubby, a bunch of 'losers'. But the fact is Jews don't regard whites as honorary fellow Jews but as the Other Palestinians, more dirty goyim to tame and control bu eviction and dehumanization. Whites have been rendered homeless in their own homeland. Globalism says white nations are no longer theirs. Gavin McInnes has been praising Jews, Jews, Jews, Israel, Israel, Israel forever just like Taylor. But he organized the Proud Boys that stood up to Antifa, the paramilitary thug force of Jewish power; and so, he was destroyed, and he's been deplatformed by everything.

Whites need to reject neo-nazi and KKK garbage -- Taylor deserves praise in having pushed that crowd away --, but they must candidly discuss Jewish power and its ultimate agenda. Twitter and Amazon's policies against Taylor will hopefully make scales fall from his eyes. His graciousness to Jews has been utterly useless. He has gained NOTHING. He has fared worse than Richard Spencer and David Duke who are still on Twitter.

Maybe Palestinians are a poor and grubby people, but it's about time whites understood their plight. Not because Palestinians are saints or glowing with nobility but because they've been denied the most basic right of humanity: Right of nationhood, territory, autonomy, the very things that Jewish Power is now denying to whites in white nations. Even in the fragments of remaining territory in West Bank, Palestinians are denied a nation-state of their own. Jewish caravans keep coming to take more land, to use up the water supply, to destroy Arab farms.
How is this any different from how Jewish Power in the US treats people like Taylor and other s who care about their own race and identity? Just like Zionists divert most of the water to Jewish settlers while making Palestinian farms go dry, Jewish Power in the US funnels most money and support to the Jewish Supremacism of AIPAC, ADL, and globo-homo agenda. While Jewish supremacists can rake in billions and be showered with billions more by US government, White Advocates can barely book a hotel for a conference, barely raise funds, and barely sell books online.
Amazon sells all the Neocon books by Jewish Supremacists responsible for 21st century wars that killed so many people. These neocons also recruited Neo-Nazis for a coup in Ukraine. Madeline Albright the Zionist Jewess said it was worth it to kill 500,000 Iraqi kids. Hillary and Obama are war criminals who destroyed Libya and used terrorists in Syria. Israel provided medical treatment to ISIS fighters and sent them back into Syria to wreck the place. There us so much evidence of Jewish supremacism, but Jews get everything because they are above criticism. But whites like Taylor get nothing. They are treated as pariahs or non-persons, just like Palestinians in West Bank.

Now, Taylor has supported the Zionist takeover of West Bank. Well, if Taylor supports Jewish illegal invasion of West Bank and scoffs at the plight of Palestinians who are denied basic nationhood, what moral legitimacy does he have in calling for national sovereignty of white nations? Also, if white people indulge and encourage bad Jewish behavior, who's to say Jews won't treat whites the same way? If you help Bob steal from Bill, will Bob be grateful and go easy on you? Or, having been emboldened by his criminality, will he come after your property next? Jews had the numbers to take over Palestine and remold it into a Jewish nation. Jews don't have the numbers to take over white nations, so they use non-white immigration-invasion to fill white nations with Diversity, allowing for Jewish divide-and-rule of fractured goyim. Also, massive race-mixing among goyim leads to loss of strong identity. All that race-mixing in Latin America robbed brown natives of a powerful sense of identity with which they could risen up against the white minority.

It is about time white people realized that "We are all Palestinians". As far as Jewish Power is concerned, white people are More Palestinians, and the West is just a huge West Bank. By realizing the truth, white people must, first and foremost, work towards White Liberation, White Emancipation, and White Independence. Only such will highlight the fact that the real supremacism in the US is Jewish and that white people are being denied the basic right of identity and interest. If Jews have a right to work for Jewish identity and interests, then European-Americans have every right to work for white identity and interests. How dare Jewish Tyranny deny this most basic right to whites. When Jews denounce identitarianism, it's not because they want ALL Peoples to give it up. Jews want whites to give up white identity so that they will serve Jewish identity instead. It's a case of 'heads I win, tails you lose'.

Whites must undermine Jewish Moral Narcissism and Megalomania. Jews gained advantage not only with the power of money but with the politics of morality. Via endless TV shows, books, movies, and etc, the Narrative made Jews out to be holy and blameless while whites were made to be the source of all evil in the world. To undermine Jewish Power, whites need to weaken its moralistic foundations. This doesn't mean whites should say the Shoah didn't happen or praise crazy Hitler. Rather, whites need to speak honestly and soberly of Jewish financial role in Western Imperialism, Jewish sales of opium to the Chinese, Jewish role in slave trade, Jewish role in communism, Jewish role in predatory capitalism in Germany of 20s and Russia of 90s, the Nakba pogroms that wiped Palestine off the map, the ongoing Occupation of West Bank, and IDF death squads mowing down Palestinians who are denied right of nationhood. Jews advantaged their own power at the expense of white well-being by pushing a moralistic anti-white narrative. Whites must return the favor. White Liberationist movement must begin as a sober assessment of Jewish Power and History. It must reject the notion of Jewish holiness or purity. While many Jews did great things, many Jews did terrible things. Unless Jewish moral narcissism is knocked down a few pegs, Jews will lord over whites like they are gods or angels.

Also, it is no longer sufficient for white patriots to be for Free Speech. Not when the Enemy attacks Free Speech as 'hate speech' with crusading fervor. Sometimes, the best defense is to play offense. So, even as White Patriots defend their own free speech, they must morally attack Jewish Supremacist speech as the ultimate hate speech. Fight fire with fire. Denounce Zionism as hate speech against Palestinians. Denounce Amazon for selling books by hateful and murderous Neocon Jewish supremacists, like Madeline Albright who said it was worth it to kill 500,000 Iraqi children. Denounce Amazon for selling books of the neo-imperialist Deep State. Denounce it for selling Hollywood movies that feature Muslims as subhuman terrorist-savages. Denounce it for selling movies that feature whites as neanderthal bigots and Christians as scum of the earth. Denounce Washington Post, Jeff Bezos' rag, as hate propaganda against Russia, Iran, Palestinians, white Americans, Christians, and patriots everywhere. Also, insist that Jews are undeserving of 'protected group' status since they are the ruling elites of the US, the lone superpower.

Just like Donald Trump took 'fake news' and threw it back at his enemies, whites must take the notion of 'hate speech', define it in their own way, and throw it back at Jewish supremacists and globohomo commissars. Whites need to support BDS as Justice Speech and denounce Zionism as 'hate speech'. Whites must condemn homomania as hateful speech against decency, health, and normality.

Granted, Jews are awful clever in how they SAY one thing but DO another. They will SAY they respect Islam and Arabs while DOING whatever necessary to wage more Wars for Israel that have laid waste to Muslim nations. They will SAY they stand for 'liberal democracy' while DOING everything to spread their hegemony of tribal oligarchy. Jews often practice Love Speech while carrying out Hate Acts. So, whites must expose this hypocrisy and judge reality by what is done than by what is said, and Jewish Power is the biggest hate-monger in the world today.

Commentary on "John Wayne Did Nothing Wrong"(by Jim Goad)

https://www.takimag.com/article/john-wayne-did-nothing-wrong/

Judging by today’s crazy standards on ‘gender’ issues, just about every actor, artist, director, and etc. in the not-too-distant past was a ‘homophobe’ and definitely a ‘transphobe’. Or, more accurately, 'homo-disdainer' and 'trans-ridiculer'. Even 90% of Liberals in the 60s thought homosexuality was deeply problematic. Even most Liberal publications dared not to broach the subject. Psychology department was convinced homosexuality is a mental disorder. Susan Sontag's piece on Camp was controversial(even in an ultra-liberal magazine like PARTISAN REVIEW) because it discussed homosexuality. So, there was nothing strange about what John Wayne said on that issue.

As for Wayne’s ‘white supremacist’ view that blacks need to undergo further civilizational process before fully partaking of democracy, is it really all that outrageous? After all, how is it all that different from Samuel Huntington's theory that Third World nations would do better to undergo process of modernization under iron-fisted Enlightened Autocrats before gradually transforming into functional democracies? If anything, even many Liberal political scholars came to the same conclusion. Many social scientists and political scholars came to believe that sudden democratization can actually do more harm than good among peoples who are as yet culturally and economically unprepared to take on burdens of electoral politics(that can only work with rule of law and civic responsibility). Such dictator-supremacist theory became quite vogue in political science departments. That is why many came to appreciate Deng over Gorbachev following the implosion of the Soviet Union. Deng maintained Party supremacy and worked on economic development, whereas Gorbachev favored political reforms. Russia did even worse in the 90s when it fully went ‘liberal democratic’ without the institutions and attitudes necessary for a functional liberal democracy. And after the Rwandan disaster, the West enthusiastically supported the iron-fisted autocrat that kept tight order in that troubled nation.
Denial of democracy in such nations doesn’t seem to bother Westerners. Indeed, Obama aided Egyptian military against democracy headed by Muslim Brotherhood. The idea was that Military supremacism was better than democracy in a nation that was, as yet, not ready for democracy and freedom. Also, after the debacles of Iraq and Libya, many(on both left and right) came to the conclusion that some nations are better off under the supremacism of an Iron-fisted leader than with experiments in ‘liberal democracy’. While democracy may be ideal for modern nations, not all nations and peoples have the values, habits, knowledge, and developmental levels to make democracy work. They just aren't cut out for it. In such cases, iron rule is often preferable to democracy. Indeed, that was precisely why Fidel Castro’s Cuba got favorable press from American Progressives during the Cold War. They admitted he was a dictator and that Cuban politics was about One-Party Supremacy, but they also emphasized that Cubans were better off under a tough ruler than many people in willy-nilly Latin American democracies where ‘leaders’ are are little more than shills of transnational corporations and organized crime. It’s oft-been duly noted that blacks in Cuba lived healthier lives than blacks in freer Latin American nations(and even in the US).

So, John Wayne’s views were along similar lines. There was not ONE America but TWO Americas. White America was sufficiently advanced for full democracy, but blacks had yet to attain full civilizational outlook to function properly in a free and democratic society. They had to undergo a process of modernization, not unlike peoples in pre-democratic developing nations, before they could take part in democracy.
Granted, this line of argument was somewhat disingenuous because whites had had lots of time to civilize blacks since the end of the Civil War but mainly used political muscle to keep blacks down and marginalized. But then, as we’ve witnessed since the 1960s, even with best intentions of progressive whites, liberated blacks tend to use their freedom to act wild and destructive than sound and constructive. With blacks, you can’t win. If you keep them in line with an iron hand, you are the oppressor. But if you give them freedom, they run wild and degrade society.
Indeed, even Wayne’s civilize-the-blacks idea wouldn’t have worked in the long run because black problems are less cultural than biological. Blacks evolved in Africa over 100,000s of years to be warriors, hunters, and jivers. With freedom, even civilized blacks eventually revert to their ugabugery.

Now, there may have been another reason why Wayne argued for denying blacks full freedom. Though he didn’t say it, he surely noticed that blacks are more muscular, more macho, and got bigger dongs. As a famous tough guy, he couldn’t honestly say, “We white guys will lose our manhood and our white women to the muscular and bigger-donged Negroes if we give them full freedom.” He had too much pride. But in fact, his ‘white supremacism’ was really a crutch against the threat of black supremacism. The 1970s movie MANDINGO with Ken Norton shows that black men are tougher than white guys, and white women get jungle fever the moment their eyes set upon some big Negro with more muscle and bigger dong. So, biology is black supremacist when it comes to raw manhood. Nature favors black manhood over white manhood in the thumping-and-humping department. But Wayne, like most white men of his period, had too much pride to speak honestly and say, “What I’m really freaked out is about black supremacism over us white guys. Did you see Woody Strode? I’m a big strong guy, but he’s twice as muscled and probably has a dong twice the size as mine. And that’s why we need segregation cuz integration will mean black supremacist manhood turning us white guys into a bunch of wussy white boy cucks.”

But it would have been better for the white race and the truth if he had said as much. All stable and lasting orders are based on truth, not fantasy.

Commentary on "Israeli ministers pledge to settle ‘2 million Jews’ in West Bank as gov’t approves 1000s more units in the heart of Palestinian communities"(by Yumna Patel)

https://mondoweiss.net/2019/02/ministers-palestinian-communities/

Israel has approved some 4,000 new settlement units as part of a massive settlement project spanning across occupied East Jerusalem and into West Jerusalem, Israeli media reported.

Zionist imperialism demonstrates that Immigration = 'Genocide'. Mass Immigration-invasion led to wipe-out of the American Indians in the 18th and 19th centuries. Mass-immigration-invasion by Conquistadors & other Old World peoples led to permanent defeat of native browns in what is now called 'Latin America'(even though it has much deeper Mayan, Inca, and Aztec roots). Mass immigration-invasion led to the natives of Hawaii losing their homeland to whites and Asians. And of course, it is leading to total eclipse of the Palestinians in West Bank by the way of demographic imperialism perpetrated by Zionist Jews with the full backing of World Jewry. The only kind of Immigration that is safe and beneficial for native or dominant folks of a nation is Replenishment Immigration whereby the newcomers are the same or very similar to the existing population(therefore, easy to assimilate). Otherwise, the grim fate is Replacement Immigration that replaces one people with another.

It seems the Fatah Party in West Bank is as useless as GOP in Congress. It is essentially controlled opposition that talks the talk but never walks the walk. Utterly corrupt and compliant with the Power behind the scenes. It made peace with Jewish Imperialists like Sal cut a deal with Barzini in THE GODFATHER.

People like Ann Coulter wonder why America can't be like Israel in controlling its own borders and immigration-policy. They fail to realize(or refuse to admit) that white Americans have more in common with Palestinians in West Bank. Both white Americans and Palestinians are now under Zionist-imperialist occupation. As the result, Jewish Caravans can stream into West Bank and take over yet more land, and endless tides of brown Caravandals can barge into the US under the political, legal, economic, and 'moral' protection of Jewish American Power. Jews want more Jews in West Bank to create Greater Israel, and Jews want more non-whites in the US to play divide-and-rule among goyim.

It's about time people like Ann Coulter stop asking, "How come we can't have a wall like Israel?" and start asking, "How come we are just like Palestinians in having no effective wall against invasion(and no effective say in immigration policy)?" Walls between Israel and West Bank only protects Israel from Palestinians; they do NOT protect West Bank from caravans of Jewish 'settlers'.

Do people like Coulter understand that the US has had only two elites? Wasps and then Jews, with most of Diversity serving Wasps in the past and Jews in the present.
It makes NO sense to bitch and complain about how current US immigration policy goes against the spirit of what the Founders wanted or how things used to be. The fate of a nation is decided by those with Power Now or Pow-Now. History matters less than Who-has-power-now.
When Muslims took over Egypt, its pagan past was swept aside despite its thousands of years of glory. When Constantinople fell to the Turks, its great churches were converted into mosques. When Japan lost WWII, its culture and customs were irrelevant in the new 'liberal democratic' order conceived and implemented to serve as the puppet of US. And, it didn't matter that Palestinians had been in the Holy Land for 2,000 yrs. When Jews took over, they instantly turned it into a Jewish state. As Jews have Pow-Now, they get to decide on policy over there in West Bank and over here in The West. Jews also get to rewrite history so that the US was always a Proposition nation. And Jewish-controlled BBC rewrites European history so that European historical figures are now presented as blacks.

Whatever the people in the past believed or wanted, they are dead and no more. The Present is controlled by We-The-Living. Sure, people draw inspiration and meaning from the past, but power is about what people do NOW. For example, there is NOTHING in Christian history or theology that blesses homosexuality, but a lot of churches in the NOW(as the result of Jewish intellectual and cultural influence) have decided to worship the holy homo, and that's that. The dead-and-buried cannot return from the graves and save us from the current power. We-the-Living must do it for ourselves in the Now. The Living will always decide. When they die, the next generation of Living will decide. It's like a rich person may leave a will and instructions to his children, but his children will ultimately decide what is to be done with the wealth and privilege. And even if there are legal clauses that bind the children, they can always find top-notch lawyers to re-interpret the will.

Two Forms of Justice in the World: Jewish Justice and Palestinian Justice — Jewish Power divided the World into Jews & Meta-Jews versus Palestinians & Meta-Palestinians; Jews regard Whites as Meta-Palestinians, not Meta-Jews

Jewish Justice

Palestinian Justice

There are two kinds of justice in the world, metaphorically speaking.
Jewish Justice and Palestinian Justice.

Notice that Jews & Israel can do just about anything. Build nukes, pass nuke technology to apartheid South Africa, aid ISIS fighters, shoot missiles into Syria, mow down Palestinian protesters, occupy Palestinian territory(and Israel itself was stolen in Nakba) & grab more land, use neo-apartheid against Palestinians, exploit Slavic women for white slavery, drug an entire nation on opioids, use the US and EU to wage Wars for Israel, rob Russia of its wealth, spread paranoia about Iran & Russia, and etc. Even get Jonathan Pollard out of prison even though his espionage led to the deaths of hundreds. And yet, all we hear from US politicians is WE LOVE JEWS, WE ARE ALL GUILTY OF THE HOLOCAUST, GIVE MORE BILLIONS TO ISRAEL, HATE IRAN, HATE RUSSIA, HATE WHATEVER JEWS HATE. That is how Jewish Justice works.

As for the Palestinians? They were destroyed by massive Jewish immigration-invasion with the backing of Jewish bankers and the empires of UK, US, & USSR. Palestinians had no chance as the great empires all gave cover and protection to Jewish takeover of Palestine. Palestinians were provoked into war because the division of their homeland was imposed by foreigners. If China or Iran today were to send in tons of their peoples into Israel and then call for dividing the nation in two -- one for Jews, one for newcomers --, how would Jews react? They would rise up and resist. Palestinians understandably rose up in 1948, but they were crushed, and the war was used as pretext to ethnically expel the bulk of the Arab population by means of terror. And then, under more bogus pretext Zionists also seized West Bank in 1967, setting off endless Jewish migration-invasions that have drastically reduced Palestinian territory. But does anyone talk of Nakba in the US? Is there Nakba day or Nakba memorial? Nakba week or Palestinian Tragedy Month? Does any politician, Democratic or Republican, mention the utter injustice experienced by Palestinians? Has there been a single movie or TV show about Nakba or the Occupation? No. That is how Palestinian Justice works.

So, metaphorically speaking, which one are you? A Meta-Jew or a Meta-Palestinian? So many stupid whites thought that if they support Jews, praise Jews, hug Jews, indulge Jews, and worship Jews, Jews would treat whites as meta-Jews. But if Jews treated whites as equals, then whites would have the same rights and privileges as the Jews. Jews couldn't tolerate that because Jewish Supremacist Power -- Current Jews are addicted to supremacism like Japanese were addicted to Pan-Asian supremacism and Germans to Pan-European supremacism in WWII -- depends on white submission and subservience to Jews, just like Jewish possession and domination of Israel-West-Bank depends on Palestinian subordination to Jewish Might. Then, it was hardly surprising that Jewish power treated whites a Meta-Palestinians.
Now, which groups did Jews promote as Meta-Jews? Blacks and Homos. Blacks could be used to paralyze white moral pride -- the stuff about slavery and endless remembrance of Emmitt Till -- and undermine white manhood pride(as black men can kick white male butt and win the respect of white women with jungle fever). Reduced to wussy cucks, white race has been made to feel a need for redemption and benediction from morally superior groups. Knowing this, Jews pulled a bait-and-switch. Bait White Americans mainly with guilt about blacks, but then steer white desire for redemption toward serving Jews and Israel, which is ironically doing to Palestinians what whites once did to blacks long ago under Segregation. Same with the manipulation of white guilt about American Indians. Tell whites that they must atone for the 'genocide' of Indians by letting in more immigration-invasion. Total Bait-and-Switch. If mass immigration destroyed the American Indians, why should there be MORE immigration? Well, it's good for Jews in their game of divide-and-rule.

As for Homos as Meta-Jews, they are useful in boosting minority-elite power/privilege as the New Normal of social, cultural, and political affairs Jewish minority-elites and homo minority-elites see eye-to-eye. Jews boost homo power, and all those homos in Deep State -- Washington DC is 10% homo -- serve the agenda of Zionist hegemony all over the world. Also, globo-homo craziness has been effective in replacing Christianity and traditional-natural-normal values that empower the normal goy populace. If all those straights have been led to believe that the highest value is 'rainbow' homos who indulge in fecal penetration and trannies who cut off penises(and beat up women in sports), then it means the great majority of normal people, de-normalized and devoid of moral confidence in themselves, must SUBMIT to the 'values' of the 'special' minority.

So, there is Jewish Justice for Jews, black Meta-Jews, and homo Meta-Jews. Whites sucked up to Jews in the hope of being considered as fellow Meta-Jews, but Jews said "No, you can't be our equal. You exist to serve us." Whites could have woken up and told Jewish power to go to hell, but they just cucked and keep their heads bowed. Uppity whites were denounced as 'white supremacist' and 'nazi'. But then, why shouldn't white elites debase themselves this way? They've lost all pride but do get fat paychecks from Jewish Power. Paul Ryan will make some serious money. The Bush Die-Nasty got a second chance with George W. Bush because it totally cucked to Neocons with Dick Cheney as middleman. The white elites are worthless cucks, but they get paid well for being such good dogs. The John McCain farewell was the biggest Good Dog pet funeral of all time.

Anyway, there is no Jewish Justice for whites. As Meta-Palestinians in the eyes of Jews, Whites only get Palestinian Justice. SPLC and ADL spread lies, but they are showered with tons of cash from Jews, favored by media, and get to defame anyone. Meanwhile, Jared Taylor has struggle and scrape to secure a place for a conference(despite the fact that among white advocates, he usually cucks to Jews). Antifa scum get to bash heads, but their violence is not denounced by the Jewish-run Media. They are indulged with favorable Jewish Justice. There are Jewish lawyers to represent them if they get caught, which is rarely the case as cops have been ordered to go easy on them. These scum can bash skulls with padlocks but get off scot-free. Meanwhile, people who push back and fight back are denied banking service, deplatformed, railroaded, and locked up behind bars. They get Palestinian Justice. And Donald Trump and Jeff Sessions have done NOTHING for white patriots. Despite the bogus rhetoric, Trump has gone along with the arrangement of Jewish Justice for Jews, blacks, homos, illegals, antifa scum AND Palestinian Justice for whites, even those who supported him despite getting attacked in the streets by globohomo thugs.

White people need to wake up to the fact that they will never be anything but Meta-Palestinians in the eyes of Jews. Sure, some whites will do okay if they collaborate, but then Palestinians who collaborate in West Bank are rewarded too. Just like there are two forms of justice in Israel-West-Bank -- one for Jews, one for Palestinians -- , there are two forms of justice in the US and the world as devised by hegemonic globohomo Jewish Power. As far as Jews are concerned, white patriots in US and EU, Russians, Iranians, Syrians, and Christian Conservatives are Meta-Palestinians who deserve Palestinian Justice. Even when Jews wrong Russia, Russia gets blamed. Even when Jewish-controlled US is the aggressor against Russia, Russia is the guilty party. Why would hypocritical Jews who treat Palestinians like shi* treat the rest of the world any differently? Why did whites ever think that if they support Jews treating Palestinians like subhumans, Jews are somehow going to treat whites any better? After all, aren't both Palestinians and whites a bunch of 'dirty goyim' in Jewish eyes? Don't Jews think in terms of "Is it good for the Jews?" wherever they are and whomever they're with? The West looked the other way and even aided Israel's invasion of West Bank, but did this lead to Jewish gratitude to the West? No, Jewish policy toward EU and US follows the same dynamics as Zionist policy toward Palestinians in the West Bank. It is population replacement and destruction of goy nationalism on the arrogant Mono-Nationalist premise that ONLY JEWS are deserving of proud identity and nationalism.

The current formula is as follows:

Jewish Justice or JJ for Jews, Negro Meta-Jews, and Homo Meta-Jews.

Palestinian Justice or PJ for whites, Russia, Syria, Iran.

And then, there's the tricky part. If Muslims are OVER THERE, they deserve Palestinian Justice. Sanction them, destroy their economy, invade them, rain bombs on them, turn them into refugees. In their home nations, all these Arabs and Muslims are Meta-Palestinians. (There are exceptions. Saudis are Meta-Jews because they are such total cuck-dogs of the Zionist-US empire. Saudis can get away with anything: Murder, Torture, aiding terrorists.)
But if Muslims are OVER HERE, they suddenly favored with Jewish Justice. Protect them, promote them, and coddle them as akin to New Jews, a vulnerable minority group that needs to be protected from MAGA-monsters. But then, if like Ilhan Omar, a Muslim in America talks about Jewish Money and Power, he or she is back to being treated with Palestinian Justice.

No matter what whites do for Jews, Jews will always regard whites as Meta-Palestinians. It's about time whites realized this. Only then can whites work toward equal justice for all peoples, one that will recognize the right of nationalism and sovereignty for all peoples(than just for Jews). What Jews mean by 'liberal democracy' is Jewish supremacism and privilege. Real justice would not favor Jews over whites or whites over Jews or Jews over Palestinians or Palestinians over Jews. It would say that Palestinians and whites are deserving of nations and national security, just like Israel as a Jewish state.
It's utterly disingenuous for whites to complain about how Jewish power is undermining nationhood for white people when white people have supported the Zionist denial of nationhood to Palestinians. By assenting to Zionism's perversion of justice into a matter of Jewish Justice for Jews and Palestinian Justice for Palestinians, whites have encouraged Jewish Power to see the entire world as a macro-version of West Bank: One rule for Jews, another for goyim.
White liberation/emancipation from Jewish supremacism begins with saying NO MORE to Zionist colonization of the West Bank. Any white person who supports this has NO RIGHT to complain about Jewish power doing the SAME THING to his own nation. If Bob supports Bill's attack on innocent Paul, why should Bob complain when Bill turns around and attacks Bob too?