Madeline Albright, Secretary of State under Billy Boy Clinton, said in an interview with Leslie Stahl that it was WORTH IT to kill and sacrifice 500,000 Iraqi children for the sake of the New World Order, one in which the US-Israel Axis gets to determine what is ‘evil’ and what is ‘justice’. She framed her remark in moralistic terms, i.e. though tragic, the killing of all those Arab children via Zionist-US sanctions is a lesser evil compared to the greater evil of Saddam Hussein or expansionist Iraq that must be contained by any means necessary. While it’s true that Hussein was a scumbag and Iraqis were no angels — indeed, what people are? — , we know Albright and her cronies were full of BS. The New World Order took shape as the Jew World Order, especially as Jewish elites edged out the traditional Wasps for top power, privilege, prestige, and authority(and even sanctity as Jews elevated themselves as the eternal Holy Holocaust People). So, the US policy since the end of the Cold War has essentially been about "Is it good for Jewish Supremacist Power?" In other words, all those Iraqi children were murdered and sacrificed for the Satan Prince of Jewish Hegemony. We might call this wicked prince ‘Paimon’, the evil but triumphant Anti-Christ presence in Ari Aster’s HEREDITARY, an esoteric work that really heralds the emergence and rise of the Jewish Man as the lord of all humanity.
Though Jews speak in moralistic terms — as did the communists and even the Nazis at times — , their sermonizing is merely a cover for their main priority, which is to create a world order in which all of goyim serve, obey, and worship Jews... or else. Unlike Christianity, the ultimate objective of which is to bless all of mankind equally with the love of God and Jesus, Judaism and Jewishness are about the Covenant that says Jews are the best people, most sacred race, and most worthy tribe to lord over all of humanity. Thus, if Christian moralism ultimately works against one’s racial/tribal interests, Jewish ‘moralism’ ultimately works to the advantage of Jews. Notice that when white Christians moralize, it’s about their own failures as Good Christians and the need to redeem themselves in the eyes of God and humanity. In contrast, when Jews moralize, it’s about how OTHER peoples did wrong to Jews and, therefore, must make amends by serving and sucking up to Jews forever and ever. Christian moralism is all-serving, whereas Jewish moralism is, like Nazism, self-serving. In the past, Christian moralism applied the same moral rules to Jews, and that served as a buffer against Jewish perfidy, but current Christian moralism worships Jews(and homos & Negroes) as higher than God and Jesus; as such it is now empty calories devoid of genuine spiritual content.
Indeed, Anti-Christianity is the new christianity. (Jews take umbrage at the notion that the Anti-Christ will be a Jewish Man, but in a way, it’s fitting. After all, if Christ was a Jew, it makes sense that Anti-Christ will also be a Jew. Both Christ and Anti-Christ as Jews would demonstrate that Jews have greater prophetic reach and imagination, for good or ill.) Personally, being a non-believer and lifelong atheist, I have no faith in God, Jesus, Heaven, Hell, Christ, or Anti-Christ. Still, there is no question that the great religions raised profound moral questions, and spirituality is a part of human nature. Therefore, the great religions must be respected(as well as critiqued by modern man) and defended from forces of Satanism. Now, what do I mean by ‘satanism’ when I don’t believe Satan exists? Even for a non-believer, certain ideas and things are clearly sick, demented, wicked, vile, and ‘evil’. When we say something is ‘evil’ or ‘satanic’, we don’t merely mean it’s bad. Indeed, most bad stuff isn’t evil. It’s just unpleasant and wrong. When someone steals, it’s bad but very much a part of human nature as humans evolved from animals who live by the ‘law of the jungle’. Also, lying and cheating come naturally to humans. They shouldn’t do it, but violating rules and codes of conduct doesn’t make one evil or satanic. Evil is much deeper, mysterious, and insidious in its vileness. It’s the difference between killing animals to eat and killing animals just for the sadistic joy of it. We know it’s always bad to kill animals. Even meat-lovers must know it’s ugly business to kill and slaughter so many animals. Still, life lives by consuming other life, and it’s just the way it is. But suppose someone decides to douse an animal with gasoline, light it on fire, and giggle with sadistic glee at the horrible sight. That would be evil. Even more evil would be if such a horrible deed was elevated to sacred status. That would be beyond even evil. It would be satanic, the deification of what is wicked. Aztec human sacrifice was satanic, beyond even evil. If the Aztecs had rounded up lots of people and had them killed for the fun of it — like the Romans with their horrible gladiatorial fights and bloodbaths — , that would have been plenty evil. But they went further and spiritualized their slaughter as an offering to their gods, as a sacred exercise. They must have worshiped the dark lords because only satanic anti-deities would make such demands. Likewise, such is why we are living in the Satanic Age in the current West. It’d be bad enough or plenty evil if the US went around killing scores of people for no good reason, but things are worse because so many Americans are convinced that their mass slaughter of other peoples is all for the good. It’s really a kind of human sacrifice. According to the likes of Albright, Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, and now even Donald Trump, it is to fight terrorism and spread ‘human rights’ & ‘democracy’ to other nations, but in truth, it really amounts to human sacrifice to appease Paimon, the demonic Jewish overlord. The US, as cuck-servant of satanic Paimon, is willing to go to any lengths to destroy any number of nations & people to gain approval from Jewish Supremacist Power. Serving Jewish Wickedness out of mere opportunism or sadism would be bad enough, indeed evil. But when Jewish Wickedness is worshiped and appeased day in and day out, the so-called New World Order is truly satanic. Same goes for the Globo-Homo nuttery. Sodomy or Homo-Fecal-Penetration is not good and can never be good. They have no health benefits and serve no biological purpose. They spread disease and lead to all sorts of health problems. And yet, because some men are born-that-way, modern society has decided to tolerate homos and decriminalize their life-style. That was mere badness. But then, this obvious badness was said to be just as (new)normal, rational, and natural as real sexuality. In other words, a dong-up-a-bung was no less legitimate as a sexual act than penis-into-vagina. And we were told a fake ‘penis’ molded from a mutilated vagina or a fake ‘vagina’ molded from a mutilated penis was just as good as the real thing. This was globo-homomania lurching into Evil territory. And then, homosexuality and tranny nonsense — so-called LGBTQ — were said to be deserving of matrimonial consecration and spiritual blessing, and this is where the whole thing became fully satanic. The West went from tolerating to worshiping the obviously bad. Anyone who worships the bad is under a satanic spell. It’d be like eating feces as the most delicious meal. Ironically, Jews who’d historically rejected idolatry made full use of it to sway the goy masses into worshiping Globo-Homomania. Unlike ideas and values that must be argued rationally and/or demonstrated morally, idolatry works merely by sensory association. If you associate homosexuality and tranny-stuff with ‘rainbow’ colors enough times, the idolatrously-inclined will feel and believe, "Gayness is a rainbow!"
Ask yourself this question. Would it be justifiable to sacrifice 500,000 Jewish kids in Israel in the name of global justice? After all, a powerful argument can be made against Israel as a massive violator of human rights. Israel was founded by grand imperialist conspiracy, extensive terrorism, and Nakba pogroms against Palestinians. Israel stole nuclear secrets from the US to build 200 to 300 illegal nukes. Though taking massive amounts of aid from the US, Israel has passed secrets to enemies and rivals of the US. In the 1980s, Jonathan Pollard didn’t act alone. He spied for Israel, and Israel used the stolen secrets to cut a deal with the USSR, then the arch-enemy of the US. Israel also began the Six Day War and occupied Palestinian territories that they still continue to occupy and fill up with Zionist caravans of illegal invaders. There was the bloody business with the USS Liberty. Jewish Neocons and other Zionists have manipulated the US to turn much of the Arab/Muslim world into a hell-hole. In other words, much of inhumane US foreign policy was cooked up by Israel Firsters working in the Deep State. Israel routinely lobs bombs and missiles into Syria and other neighboring nations. Israel also has the Samson option and threatens all of Europe with nuclear destruction if Israel were to fall. Indeed, even the inhuman sanctions levied against Iraq, Iran, and other nations have their origins in Jewish supremacist hatred for any nation or people that might rival Israel's status as the lone superpower in the Middle East. Israel has also worked with Saudi Arabia to aid and arm ISIS and other terrorists in the region. And Israel was once the closest ally of South Africa when Apartheid was still around. Israel even sent nuclear secrets to South Africa, the secrets it had stolen from the US. Jews in the US overlooked the close ties between South Africa and Israel even as they berated South Africa for ‘racism’, all the while ignoring the greater injustice meted out to Palestinians by Zionist supremacists. (Apparently, injustice for Palestinians is okay whereas injustice for blacks by whites is intolerable.)
So, given all these facts about Jews and Israel, would it be morally justified for the US and the world to economically sanction Israel to the point where 500,000 Israeli children are killed by malnutrition, starvation, and disease? If we believe in universal justice, and if good decent humanitarians like Madeleine Albright believe it was worth it to kill a half-million Arab kids(as a lesser evil) to counter the much bigger evil of Saddam Hussein, then shouldn’t the same moral logic apply to Israel? If killing 500,000 Arab kids was 'worth it' to pressure Iraq to become a better nation, then wouldn't it be worth it to kill 500,000 Jewish kids in the hope that Israel will be a nicer and kinder place for Palestinians, Arabs, and Muslims in Israel, West Bank, and neighboring nations(as so much of the violence in that part of the world in recent years originated from Jewish agenda that more-or-less guides the totality of US foreign policy)? But if someone were to suggest that even 50,000 or 5,000 or 500 Jewish kids should be sacrificed for the greater good of the region, most people in the West will scream ‘Another Holocaust!’ Such mindset suggests that a Jewish life is at least worth 1,000 or 10,000 Arab lives. Believing it’s justifiable to kill 500,000 Arab kids for a better Iraqi future while believing it’s horrific to kill just 500 Jewish kids fora better Israeli/Palestinian future would be a case of brazen hypocrisy and moral blindness. If indeed all lives are of equal worth, why is it okay to sacrifice countless Arab lives but unacceptable to ponder even sacrificing a few Jewish lives for a better future?
But there is something even worse in the whole equation. All those dead Iraqi kids weren’t really the result of a humanitarian policy, however misguided it may have been. It was not like the US(and Israel) were willing to use ‘necessary evil’ to bring about a greater good in the region. Zionists wanted Hussein crippled or gone, but they had no desire to see a powerful and prosperous Iraq as a democracy. After all, even a prosperous democracy can be anti-Zionist. The fact that the US developed as a democracy didn’t make it any less war-mongering than most autocratic empires. And this is why what we consider a failure in Iraq, Libya, and Syria are really successes in the eyes of Yinon-ist Jews who want to see the Arab/Muslim world in constant turmoil. That means all those Iraqi kids perished not due to some flawed humanitarian foreign policy but due to Jewish Supremacist plan to sacrifice any number of goy lives to gain greater advantages for Israel and Jewish globalist power. It would have been tragic enough if all those Iraqi kids died on the altar of misguided humanitarianism, but the truth is their deaths were the result of diabolical satanism of Zionist megalomania. I call it satanic because what is brazenly Jewish Supremacism is revered and worshiped as the highest form of humanitarianism by idiotic Americans. Jews spread horror in the Middle East, North Africa, and Ukraine; they use their influence to force sanctions on Iran and to restart a ‘new cold war’ with Russia. They do all this in the service of Jewish Supremacism that is as repulsive as Nazi-German supremacism during World War II, but they’ve managed to wrap their demonic agenda with the veneer of ‘humanitarianism’, ‘war on terror’, and ‘spreading democracy’ that so many childish Americans have come to worship. With their control of media, cuck goy politicians, finance, and academia, Jews can create a false narrative for countless suckers. If Nazis ruled Current US and spun all their supremacism and imperialist wars as ‘spreading democracy’, ‘fighting terror’, and some such nonsense, the chances are so many Americans would swallow it hook, line, and sinker.
If it was justifiable to kill 500,000 Iraq kids for a better tomorrow, then it’s justifiable to kill 500,000 Jewish kids for a better future. If you say it’s absolutely unconscionable to sacrifice Jewish kids — 5,000 or 50,000, let alone 500,000 — for some higher ‘humanitarian’ objective, then the same logic must apply to Arab children. And yet, the very people who wouldn’t abide the killing of 500 Jewish kids shrug their shoulders about the deaths of 500,000 Iraqi kids. (By some estimates, the number of dead Iraqi kids is considerably smaller, but let’s keep in mind that Monster Albright accepted those figures when she said it was WORTH IT to kill so many.) There is tremendous cognitive dissonance in the Jewish-controlled West. We are told that the Shoah taught us that life is precious and sacred, but in emphasizing Jewish tragedy uber alles, the end-result has been that Jewish lives are deemed 'more equal than others' and especially precious. Thus, all efforts must be made to 'save' and 'protect' Jewish lives. Furthermore, any number of goy lives may be sacrificed if doing so is deemed beneficial to Jewish lives. So, ironically, the anti-supremacist lesson drawn from the horrors of WWII became perverted into Jewish supremacist idolatry. The lesson Jews took from the tragedy is not "Having suffered so much, we Jews want to make sure that same thing doesn’t happen to other peoples" but instead, "Having suffered horribly and having gained moral status as the greatest victims of all time, ANY MEANS is justified to prevent another Jewish Holocaust." And so, if Jews see Hitlers and New Nazis everywhere, the West led by the US as lone superpower must do everything in its means to crush the new Axis of Evil, even if it means 100,000s or even millions of goyim are ruined, destroyed, or left dead. Paradoxically, ‘preventing another holocaust’ has led to more holocausts around the world. To save and protect the precious Jews, we must take their warnings seriously about ‘new hitlers’ and ‘new nazis’ and use endless sanctions and military might to starve, bomb, and terrorize people on Earth as sacrificial offering to the holy-schmoly Jews. How truly sickening.
How long can Jews and the world carry on like this? Also, aren’t Jews aware that they're are antagonizing all the world? Muslims and Arabs hate them. Even Saudis who are allied with Israelis hate them and carry on with the charade because of Sunni-Shia rivalry. As time passes and as more Europeans wake up to what Jews are up to, there will be a return of ‘antisemitism’ on the Continent. And given Jewish perfidy, there are more and more people on both the Left and Right who are noticing that it’s the JEWS who are behind the curtain in the Land of Poz. Also, the anti-white propaganda pushed by Jews have led to blacks hating Jews. Blacks may be stupid, but they are not dumb; they see that Jews are the most powerful and privileged among the privileged whites. And even though Vladimir Putin is good to Jews and protects them, most Russians surely feel bitter about Jews as they know what happened in the 1990s, and they know it was the Jews who were behind the ‘new cold war’, the sanctions, and the mess in Ukraine. As time passes, who will like the Jews? Wouldn’t Jews be liked IF they chose to be decent and stop with their supremacism, imperialism, and hegemonism? But apparently not. Jews are now so addicted to power and wealth that, deep down inside, they probably feel that they can’t be good Jews. Sure, they use media to project the image of the Holy Jews, but their behavior and attitude are totally contrary to the human spirit. Thus, Jews will continue to act the Big A**hole and prepare for a world where they will be resented and even hated by most groups. In other words, Jews have wagered on a future world of anti-Jewish hate than pro-Jewish sympathy. Jews feel that their insatiable egotism and powerlust will eventually drive various goyim against Jews. After all, if Jews decided to act good and decent, they will lose much of their ill-gotten wealth and greedy power. So, Jews must continue to act like George Soros, and that means increasingly alienating just about all of goy humanity. Then, how could Jewish Power survive in a world of increasing anti-Jewish animus? This is where Jewish Satanism kicks into high gear and conceives of all sorts of policies and agendas — mass immigration, divide-and-rule via Diversity, globo-homo, jungle fever, interracism, white cuckery, emasculation of Western Man and Eastern Man, endless wars in the Middle East, mass deaths by opioids, skankery, and etc. — to create a world of such chaos, disorder, and confusion that the goyim the world over won’t be able to be sober, serious, and united in their resolve to finally do something about the radical evil of Jewish Power. And of course, their mountain of money means they can buy up all the hacks in the valley. By now, most US politicians must know that Jewish Power is vile and venal. But they want more shekels thrown their way, so they go along with Jews-as-holy-schmoly act. Buying all that influence is very expensive, but money is something Jews are never in shortage of.
Whatever one thinks of Christian Zionism, it might not be so bad IF Christian Zionists lived by courage, consistency, and a real set of principles. But in fact, they are mostly craven cowards whose main premise is serving Jewish Supremacy based on Jewish Money and the Cult of Shoah(aka Holocaust). It’s like one can disagree with a certain ideology or set of values but still admire the courage, conviction, and commitment of those involved in the movement. At the very least, one can credit them as true believers, warriors, and crusaders. But this cannot be said of Christian Zionists whose positions and actions belie even their supposed core convictions. For all their invocation of God and sacred text of the Bible, they seem to be mainly motivated by a servile awe of wealth, power, privilege, and cultist-idolatry of (Jewish)Man above God. In other words, for the Christian Zionists, Jews and Israel are BIGGER than God and Jesus. And some of them cave to whatever Jews insist. So, if Jews push globo-homo, certain Christian Zionists will say ‘gay marriage’ is in tune with Christian doctrine.
If we take Christian Zionists at their word, they should at the very least condemn most Jews as ungodly, immoral, degenerate, and satanic. After all, most Jews are secular and non-religious. If they worship anything, it is themselves via the Cult of Shoah and Money. Indeed, Holocaust has become a kind of Holo-boast, as if what happened in World War II lends Jews moral & spiritual protection for whatever they do, no matter how foul, vicious, and inhuman. Now, if Christian Zionists were to say they have a special feeling for Jews because (1) Christianity grew out of Judaism & Jesus and the Apostles were all Jewish (2) Jews received the Covenant first (3) Christianity overly persecuted the Jews (4) Jews made great contributions to humanity in literature and science (5) Jews experienced a unique tragedy in the Shoah (6) God wants Jews to return to the Holy Land (7) God blesses those who bless Jews, THEN their admiration and sentiments would be understandable. But, that very premise presupposes that Jews are the people of God and essentially a Good people who were misunderstood and mistreated through the ages. Then, Christian Zionism would be an effort to reverse Christian Antisemitism that, for most of Christian History, defined the Church. It would face up to the fact that most Jews are the beloved of God, humble before God, and a blessing to all humanity. It would be a redemptive corrective to Christian Antisemitism that had mis-characterized Jews for too long. Christian Zionism, with its true and correct understanding of Judaism and the Jews, would work toward conciliation between Christian Gentiles and Jews the world over. One could agree or disagree with Christian Zionism, but one could at least respect them for their consistency if indeed their words and actions were in tune with their perceptions and convictions. In other words, if real-world Jews conformed to Christian-Zionist conception of Jews, there would be some validity to Christian Zionism.
However, if real-world Jews are, for the most part, nothing like the Christian Zionist vision of Jews, then the only sensible decision would be to reject Christian Zionism or, at they very least, seriously alter its terms and conditions. After all, what would be the point of Christian Zionists continuing to honor, admire, and support Jews if real-world Jews are nothing like their idealized image of the Tribe? For example, if you conceive of and adore wolves as peaceful herbivores but they turn out to be aggressive and dangerous carnivores, you would have to abandon or alter the terms of your admiration for wolves. You would either have to loathe wolves as bloody carnivores or admire them on the basis of their prowess as ruthless hunters. It would make no sense for you to stick to the belief that wolves are peaceable herbivores even as you know full well that they’re vicious carnivores? And it would be even weirder if you admire their prowess as blood hunters but still pretend they’re peaceful herbivores. That would be either surreal, retarded, or a pathological case of self-deception.
While many Christian Zionists are low-IQ dummies woefully misinformed about world affairs and Jewish Power, there are many in the movement who DO know the truth about real-world Jews and their global impact. They know that Jews are the greedy oligarchs of Hollywood. They know that Jews are the main pornographers. They know that Jews are the key purveyors of globo-homo degeneracy. They know Jews are the main instigators of mass immigration-invasion by non-white non-Christians into the West. They also know Jews turned the Holy Land into Sodom and Gomorrah. They know that Jews control Hollywood & TV and are responsible for so many anti-white, anti-Western, and anti-Christian movies and programs. They know that Jews ally with Muslims in the EU and US against Christians. They know that most Jews regard Evangelicals with utmost hostility. They know that Jewish lawfare has removed God and Christianity from so many public spaces. They know Jews pushed ‘gay marriage’. They know Israel is the center of White Slavery around the world. They also know that even religious Jews who do worship God feel a great deal of animus toward goyim and especially Christians. They know that many Israelis revere rabbis who say goyim are hardly better than cattle and exist only to serve Jews. They know what Rick Wiles knows: KOSHER COVER-UP: U.S. RULING CLASS HIDES EPSTEIN CHILD SEX BLACKMAIL OPERATION.
In other words, many Christian Zionists and Evangelicals know that most Jews are hostile to Christianity, morality, and the West in general. Also, they know that even religious Jews are not only anti-Christian but virulently hate Christianity more than anything. True, there are dumb ignorant Christian Zionists who live in their bubble and only believe what they want to believe, i.e. Jews and Christians are the best of friends and allies under the eyes of God; their main perception of Jews comes from sermons of cuck-preachers who take Jewish Money and from their potemkin-village pilgrimages to the Holy Land where cynical Jews lead them around by the nose to create false impression that Jews are friendly toward Western Christians(when it’s all just a stunt to squeeze more support and money from gullible Christians). Now, while a Christian may have special feelings for Jews for historical/spiritual reasons, he MUST NOT believe Jews are holier than Christians or deserving of treatment above and beyond what Christians get. After all, even if one believes that Jews were the original Chosen People, Christianity is premised on the notion that God offered a New Covenant to all the people of the Earth via Jesus and that Jews not only rejected the Son of God but played a key role in His death. Indeed, Christianity loses its very raison d'ĂȘtre if it says Judaism is just as valid as Christianity, let alone even holier. After all, if Judaism is just as good or even better, why was there a need for the Son of God in Jesus, the New Faith, and the New Covenant? Aviation went from propeller engines to jet-engines because the latter was deemed superior. It’d be silly to be for jet-engines but also insist that propeller engines are just as good(or even better). While Christians can and should respect Judaism as the root of Christianity, their deference would be rather perverse given that Christianity not only grew out of Judaism but in ‘radical’ rejection of its tenets. Via Christianity, God’s main concern went from Jews to those who would accept the New Faith. For true Christians, New Testament has authority over Old Testament, and therefore, the New Covenant must mean more than the Old Covenant. The perverse thing about Christian Zionists(and other Christians who cuck to Jews and/or Israel) is they claim to be devoutly Christian but go more by the Old Book than the New Book. It’s almost as if their main object of worship is actually Jew-Envy that they live out by sucking up to Jews as the True Chosen People, the real Master Race. And this awe of Jews seems less based on Biblical Text than on real-world Mammon-Factor, i.e. Jews are the richest and most powerful people who, through their control of media, propped themselves as the New Christs resurrected from the ashes of the Holocaust. Thus, Christian Zionism is really a worship of Man and Mammon. Jews are worshiped because they are (1) richest & most powerful and (2) perceived as the most sacro-tragic people, of course mainly because Jews control most of media and academia.
If Christian Zionists were true to their word, then they could have two viable responses to the truth about Jews. Upon realizing the truth about real-world Jews and the anti-Christian nature of Judaism — true Judaism can only regard Christianity as a heresy and theft of God by goyim — , Christian Zionists could admit their error and stop quasi-worshiping Jews. They would admit that, more often than not, Christian Anti-Semites were correct about Jews and Judaism(and its hostile relation to Christianity in particular and to goyim in general). Or, Christian Zionists can be very selective in their attitude toward Jews. They could single out those devout God-fearing Jews who are willing to co-exist with Christians on the basis of mutual respect(if not agreement) and support them in the US and Israel. That said, Christian Zionists would feel it’s their moral and spiritual obligation to condemn and denounce most Jews as either secular/atheist, decadent/degenerate, anti-Christian/anti-white, imperialist/genocidal, and/or greedy/perverted. After all, even in the Old Testament, God often separates wheat from the chaff by sparing the good Jews while condemning the bad Jews to death and destruction. The Golden Calfers certainly got it in the neck. Likewise, Christianity emerged by ‘good’ Jews separating themselves from ‘bad’ Jews who rejected Jesus as the Son of God and the Salvation that He promised. It makes no sense to praise and support ALL THE PEOPLE of a group. Such can only be idolatrous cult-worship of identity. After all, no people are entirely good, noble, or sacred. There are good whites, bad whites. Good blacks, bad blacks. Good yellows, bad yellows. Good Russians, bad Russians. Good Iranians, bad Iranians. Then, Christian Zionists ought to know that there are good Jews and bad Jews. Also, given what Christian Zionists claim to hold dear in morality and spirituality, they should admit that MOST Jews are viciously hostile to them and, at best, cynically exploit their support for Israel merely for tribal opportunism. The problem isn’t simply with secular Jews but many conservative religious Jews, such as Ben Shapiro. Shapiro is a religious Jew but regards Christians as mere cattle and cannon fodder for Jewish Supremacism. He’s not for peaceful existence with Christians(and Muslims) on the basis of mutual respect(if not admiration). Rather, he’s for using Christ-Cuck Soldiers to destroy Muslim and/or Arab enemies of Israel, and he’s for using Arab/Muslim immigrants in the West against whites/Christians. He demands that Christians respect, admire, and serve Jews, but he feels NOTHING for Christians and, as far as I can tell, longs for the total destruction of Christianity. Such Jews want to make Christians and Muslims mutually destroy one another so that Jews will rule the world. As such, even though he opposes the ‘gay’ agenda, he sees its usefulness in undermining Christian Order and Gentile Morale of Morality.
Christian Zionism would be somewhat valid IF Christian Zionists argued that the Holy Land belongs to Good Devout Jews who’ve chosen mutual respect and peaceful co-existence with the Christian World. Also, being Christians, they would have as much sympathy for Christian Arabs as for Jews. At the very least, they would pressure Jews to be accepting of Christian Arabs even if not for Muslim Arabs. All said and done, a true Christian must favor fellow Christians over Jews. But, look at the likes of Ted Cruz. They claim to be Christian, but they favor ALL Jews over Christian Arabs whose communities have been utterly smashed by Wars for Israel. The fact that Christian Zionists admire, worship, and serve ALL JEWS — regardless of their lack of faith, hostility toward Christians/goyim, insatiable worldly greed, and spread of degeneracy/decadence — makes it plain as day that their true religion is Power Worship and the Cult of the Superior Man. In effect, they worship Jews as the New-Nihilo-Christ for the simple fact that Jews got the most money, power, privilege, and control of media with which to elevate themselves as the Holy Holocaust People who better be obeyed because otherwise thou shall be destroyed.
If Christian Zionists really put God and Jesus above all, they would have the courage and conviction to (1) call out on bad Jews and (2) acknowledge that most Jews are godless, greedy, hateful, hostile, subversive, corrupting, and pro-satanist. Their mindless praise of ALL JEWS despite the fact that most Jews hate their guts and do everything to destroy the Christian Order exposes the utter phoniness of Christian Zionism as it currently exists. If Christian Zionists said something along the line of, "We acknowledge Jews as a great people whose religion and culture laid down the foundation for Christianity. We acknowledge the special talent of Jews and their contributions to civilization. Perhaps, such talents are the gifts of God. We also acknowledge that Jews through the ages have often been collectively scapegoated and victimized. And we acknowledge that the Shoah, aka the Holocaust, was one of the great horrors in human history. That said, we also know that Jews not only rejected Jesus, the Son of God, but did their part in killing Him. We also know the problems between Jews and Gentiles often arose from contempt Jews felt for Gentiles who were deemed less intelligent and less(or not) blessed by God. There was Christian Antisemitism, but there was also Jewish Anti-Goyism. In the modern era, many Jews of secular bent either used communism to destroy millions of Slavic lives or capitalism & degeneracy to destroy millions of white lives. Also, even though we understand the profound attachment that Jews feel for the Holy Land, we sympathize with Palestinians who also have deep historical roots in the land and were driven out in the Nakba pogroms. In our time, Jews have gained dominance in the US as lone superpower, and most Jews are now in supremacist mode. They will do anything — sell bad drugs, spread pornification of culture, push mass immigration-invasion, wage Wars for Israel in which mostly goyim die, replace Christianity with globo-homo Queertianity, and etc. — to secure their supremacist position vis-a-vis the rest of humanity. As such, while we Christian Zionists pray for Jews and support the Right of Return for devout and decent Jews who respect us as we respect them, we condemn MOST JEWS who’ve lost their way and are leading humanity astray with more wars, decadence, culture of greed, and degeneracy." If Christian Zionists said something along those lines, we can at least recognize it is not without a head, heart, and spine. But instead, what do we get from Christian Zionists? Mindless support of Israel despite the fact that Jews proudly say it is the ‘gayest country in the world’ and celebrate globo-homo-mania to the extent that much of Israel looks more like Sodom and Gomorrah than God’s Country. Mindless support of ALL Jews despite the fact that so many Jews either took part in communism and killed millions of Christian Slavs or used capitalism to spread vice industries, decadence, and degeneracy, leading to the deaths of so many whites(and blacks) from drugs, sexual diseases, and wanton self-indulgence.
Christian Zionists apparently see nothing wrong in the fact that the biggest donors to the so-called ‘conservative’ GOP are gambling moguls and hedge-fund parasites like Sheldon Adelson and Paul Singer. Christian Zionist idea of a Good Society is Pottersville(in IT’S A WONDERFUL LIFE) controlled by Jews. And for all their Christian piety, these Christian Zionist even root for globo-homo secular Zionists over Christian Arabs who’ve been rendered homeless by endless Wars for Israel. Therefore, Christian Zionism as it currently exists has zero spiritual value and zero moral content. It is really just empty calories of nihilistic worship of Power & Wealth, a kind of Ayn-Randism draped in Christian cloth. Indeed, notice how fast ‘gay marriage’ and globo-homo in general are spreading among Evangelicals as well. So much for fundamentalist faith in God, Jesus, and the True Way. These christ-cucks, just like Mammonic Mormons, will eventually bend every rule to bend over to the Top Power of finance, media, vice industries, and the deep state. Of course, so many American churches, Mainline and Evangelical(and Catholic and Mormon) have been infiltrated by Deep State culture-assassins. Or, they’re run by weak-willed craven opportunists who, when push come to shove, will sacrifice God and Jesus for their slice of the pie in a world that is so much in the control of Jews as the new god.
Iraq War happened in 2003, and back then, the US was still recognizably a normal country. In retrospect, it should be obvious to any sane, moral, and responsible person that it was a criminal enterprise cooked up by Zionist-supremacists, Deep State, and the Military-Industrial Complex. In truth, the people most responsible for 9/11 were the US, Israel, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and their proxy terrorists. The US and its allies had built up terrorist Jihadis in the hope of using them against secular Arab nations, Iran, and Russia, but there was blow-back, whereupon the terrorists turned their fury on the Metropole of the US itself. But then, it turns out that the Israeli Intelligence knew there was a plot among Muslim extremists and nudged & guided them to carry out 9/11 attacks. Zionist agents thought the attack would be good for Israel and the Jewish Empire. Using 9/11 as justification, the US(then led by George W. Bush and Neocon Zionists) decided to invade & occupy Afghanistan indefinitely and to cook up bogus excuses to invade & occupy Iraq. It was all a pile of manure, but many Americans bought the lie and supported the war. Majorities in both political parties gave Bush II a blank check to invade another nation on false pretext.
Still, we can understand why so many white/conservative Americans were then willing to fight for America. Not only did they feel that the US had been attacked by Muslim terrorist-extremists but that the US was a sane, sound, and normal nation that deserved defending. Turn back the clock to 2003, and there was no 'gay marriage'. There was no trannies reading books to children at libraries and kindergartens. No all-out Jewish Agenda to confiscate guns from White Americans. There was no revelation about Jeffrey Epstein. There was considerably less promotion of Jungle Fever and Cuckery. There were no explicit TV Shows calling for the culling and mass-murder of whites-as-Nazis as in recent shows like THE HUNT. Hollywood had yet to make movies like DJANGO UNCHAINED and GET OUT. Tattoos and piercings were, as yet, not so common. While the silently lethal opioid crisis had already begun, it had yet to claim over 100,000s of more lives. American churches were not desecrated and culturally vandalized with globo-homo 'gay' victory banners. Bakeries weren't destroyed for refusing to bake 'gay wedding' cakes. Businesses were not threatened with lawsuits, bankruptcy, or curtailment for not supporting the 'gay' agenda. Hate Hoaxes had yet to go totally out of control. Universities didn't yet have 'safe spaces' and explicitly shut down free speech. Big Tech had yet to show its true Zionist-supremacist face and use monopoly power to shut down white patriots and Palestinian Rights activists. Though there were plenty of skanks in pop music, twerking had yet to appear on the scene. And Miley Cyrus and worse were yet to arrive on the horizon as 'role models' for young white girls. There were no trannies in washrooms, and there were still only two 'genders' or sexes. There were movies like BROKEBACK MOUNTAIN, but globo-homo had yet to saturate popular culture. And shameless Jewish moguls in sex culture and pornography had yet to make so explicit the New Ideal of Black Male and White Female to push ACOWW or Afro-Colonization of White Wombs. Also, Barack Obama, the product of ACOWW, had yet to become president as an interracist symbol celebrating white wombs being colonized by black seeds. TV shows still weren't as deranged as Lena Dunham's quasi-porn GIRLS. Not every other character in TV and movies was homo or black. Jewish Power hadn't as yet OPENLY declared demographic war against whites with hideous glee. The financial collapse of 2008 hadn't yet happened, what with Jewish Wall Street getting bailed out to the tune of $1 trillion plus. US had yet to declare new cold war with Russia on account of its saying NO to globo-homo 'gay pride' parades and 'gay marriage'. The US had yet to cook up more BS to destroy Libya(despite Gaddafi's peace overtures), pull off a coup in Ukraine, and use terrorists to rip Syria apart. BLM lunacy had yet to grip the US. And it would have been hard to imagine something like the Pussy Hat March in 2003. Back then, anti-war marches against Bush II were on point. And so on and so on.
Trends weren't looking good in 2003, but the US back then still looked like a normal nation with ties to the tradition and values. But consider all the things that happened since 2003. The implosion of Bush II's idiotic presidency(thus disgracing all of conservatism by association) and the degenerate acceleration of culture, values, and ideas in the Obama years. US is now a totally transformed nation, one in which the Vile Jewish Cat has come out of the bag to scratch out the eyes of White America. Current America is beyond sick. Americans may denounce Iran as a theocracy, but the US is allied with a worse theocracy of Saudi Arabia. Furthermore, the US itself, far from being genuinely secular, liberal, and free, is really a new kind of theocracy or a neocracy. Or a Idolacracy, a nation that worships certain groups and figures as the new idols. US is a idolacracy where it’s mandatory to worship Jews & Shoah, Magic Negroes & MLK, and Globo-Homos. MLK cult is the religion of the US. We must worship MLK as a saint, perfect man, the true founding father, bigger than god and jesus rolled into one. If you question or deconstruct the promises of Diversity, you shall be hounded and un-personed. If you take moral action against globo-homo desecration of churches festooned with ‘gay victory’ banners, you will be tried and sentenced to 16 yrs in jail.
Even a mega-company like Chick Fil A is forbidden under Jewish/homo pressure from donating to Salvation Army and other Christian groups. Any politician who doesn’t agree that Israel is America’s greatest ally is targeted for the purge. So much for liberal democratic liberty and secular values. PC or wokeness, like Marxism-Leninism in communist nations, is merely the basis of a new set of sacrosanct symbols and catechisms. Iranian theocracy may be bad, but at least it doesn’t equate spirituality with celebration of twerking blacks, psychopathic Jewish supremacists, and shameless sodomites. At the 1992 GOP convention, Pat Buchanan called the US "God's Country". Given all the political, social, and cultural transformations whereby sodomy became the highest value among even so many so-called christians and Mormons, it's fair to say the New America is Satan's Country. Iran has called the US the 'Great Satan', and it proved prophetic. A country that worships idolatry and degeneracy will become just that. When Americans worshiped God, they believed in a power beyond anything of, by, and for Man with all his flaws. But once America came to worship identity groups(mainly Jews, blacks, & homos) and certain individuals(esp. Mandela, MLK, Oprah, Harvey Milk, Netanyahu, & Anne Frank) as the holiest of the holy, the ultimate power was invested in identity-politics and cult of personality. So, the new heresies are 'antisemitism'(or daring to question/criticize Jewish Power), 'racism'(noticing facts about blacks), and 'homophobia'(or the idea that you're mentally sick and morally decrepit if you don't see sodomy as a wonderful rainbow). Thus, certain groups and individuals are now bigger than God, the Truth, and the Cosmos. Everything revolves around the megalomania and egotism of Jews, blacks, and homos as the Holy Three. A people who worship such false gods are living in Satan's Country.
Given the current state of the US where Jews routinely smear and insult the white race and, furthermore, encourage anti-white hatred among blacks and other non-white groups, do white men in the US military really want to fight for Jewish globalist interests and Israel? By the way, what have Jews done to the Holy Land? They turned it into Sodom and Gomorrah. Some say Israel is the 'gayest country in the world'. If you think Sharia is bad, think of Gayria that spreads and enforces degeneracy as not only the New Normal but the New Sacred. Jewish Power even says a sentiment like "It's Okay to be White" is 'hate speech' and gets the FBI to look into the matter. Jews fund ADL and SPLC to spread libel and slander about white patriots and Christian groups. Anyone who doesn't totally toe the Jewish line is attacked as 'nazi', 'white supremacist', or whatever. Think of what Jewish Power did to Nick Sandman and the Covington Catholic kids. Consider how the Jew-run media suppress stories of black-on-white violence & crime and instead use Hollywood and TV to spread the false impression that innocent blacks are being hunted by evil cops. Indeed, why should white cops go out on a limb to protect Jews from black criminals when Jews in media and entertainment always blame white police and idealize blacks as precious darlings(even when they are depicted as criminals)? It makes no sense for white cops to protect Jews from blacks, and it makes no sense for white soldiers to fight for Jewish interests when one of those interests happen to be War on Whites. Jews are hellbent on Afro-colonizing white wombs and Globo-colonizing white lands with Diversity. Even as Jews promote their identity and interests, they deny any such to whites on the grounds that anything with even a whiff of white consciousness is 'nazi'. Unless you're a dog, cuck, or Janissary moron, why would you serve such a people? Why would you kill or die for the mortal enemy of your race? It's bad enough that whites do nothing against Jews who are waging War on White. But it's truly atrocious that white men sign up for the military and do the fighting, killing, and dying for the aggrandizement of this most vicious Tribe. It's like working for a gangster thug who kills your father, rapes your mother, addicts your brother to drugs, and turns your sister & daughter into hookers. White men need to wake up. Arabs, Muslims, and Iranians are far from perfect and have their failings, but they are NOT the enemy. They are not the ones who control the West and engineer White Nakba. Also, if Jews ally with Diversity against whites, whites should return the favor and side with elements of Diversity against Jews. But, pathetically enough, even as Jews use Diversity against whites, whites vow to protect Jews from Diversity. If someone comes at you with a knife, would you then try to protect him from that very knife? The fact is whites in the West and Iranians have one thing in common. Both groups are targeted for defeat and destruction by the Jews. Jews intended to carry out White Nakba and turn all white nations into non-white majority countries. Jews intend to desecrate Christianity and true morality among non-Jews with globo-homo filth and Afro-jive idolatry. Jews intend to demonize whites and scapegoat them for all the problems in the world, not least to distract people from the fact that Jews got the ultimate power. When Jews regard and abuse whites in such manner, should the attitude of whites be the cuckish dream of, "Gosh, gee, maybe if we do this favor for the Jews, they will finally love us and hug us." What kind of sappy shit is that? And if Jews call you an 'Anti-Semite', tell them that you're a Anti-Supremite because the Semites are now Supremites or supremacist Semites who seek world hegemony. Sure, Jews will deny it as conspiracy theory, but the cat is out of the bag. There is so much evidence of Jewish supremacist agenda and power. And Jewish arrogance sometimes blurts out that White Nakba is happening, Jews are behind it, and Jews are celebrating total victory over whites.
The current reality is truly incredible. Jews use media to make some of the most rabid and virulent movies and shows about whites. Some of these are near-genocidal, portraying MAGA-rians as subhuman filth that must be eradicated. In other words, White Patriots are the new Kulaks or KKKulaks. When both whites and Iranians are equally dehumanized by Jewish power, one would expect them to unite against Jews. But white morons in the US are sucking up to Jews in the hope that, gee whiz, maybe just maybe, if they root for Jews and against Iran just ONE MORE TIME, the Jews will finally be nice to whites. What dummies.
One key difference between Iranians and White Americans is this:
When Jews/Zionists dehumanize and undermine Iranians, Iranians defy the Jews and push back. When Jews/Zionists dehumanize and undermine white, whites cuck even harder and serve the Jews.
When Jews belittle Iranians, Iranians stand up to Jews and vow to resist. When Jews belittle whites, whites kneel before Jews and vow to serve.
Still, the end result is goyim vs goyim as the Jews wish.
This is why White Liberation is so essential and will save the world. Iran doesn’t endanger the world because it says NO to Jewish supremacist power and hegemonic agenda. In contrast, whites endanger the world because they say YES-YES-YES to Jewish supremacist power and serve it most loyally like dogs. If whites were to look to Iran for inspiration and gain white liberation, independence, autonomy, and emancipation from Jewish Supremacist Power(JSP), then Jews wouldn’t be able to wage more wars(and more cold wars). Without the compliant white horse and saddle, the Jewish rider couldn’t go very far. The world would be a safer and better place. Indeed, this very reason is why Jews are so hellbent on vilifying Russia and Iran as two major nations that remain independent of JSP. What Jewish Supremacist Power fears most is that whites in the West might do what the Russians and Iranians have done. Gain true autonomy. After all, why should whites serve the Jews when the Jewish Agenda is the Great Replacement, Jungle Fever and Afro-Colonization of White Wombs, anti-white propaganda & scape-whiting(or scapegoating of whites), globo-homomania as replacement for Christianity, and etc? Whites must be the dumbest people on Earth as they go about serving the very people who mean them the most harm. It’d be like Poles serving the Nazis during WWII or Hungarians welcoming Soviet tanks in 1956. Jews have harassed Trump from day one, but he serves them. How pathetic.
In a way, Iran is fighting for all of us goyim. Just like the French were once under Nazi Occupation, we are under Globo-Homo-Shlomo Occupation. Americans need to be shaken out of the Jewish Media hypnosis. They need to be liberated from the Occupation. The West is currently just one big West Bank. US military is just a Janissary force doing the bidding of Jewish supremacists and LGBTQ degenerate neo-aristos. Say NO to White Nakba. Say NO to the cuck-traitor comprador elites of GOP and Democratic Party. Go Iran, No Zion.
US invaded Iraq and removed Hussein, the obstacle between Iran and Syria. Without Hussein, Iraq joins the Shia crescent. Jews didn't like that, so the US took on the role of Hussein. What irony. US has become the ‘New Hussein’. We must ask, ‘who sane?’
The video above begins with Kevin Michael Grace's defense of Donald Trump's assassination of Soleimani and Iraqi militiamen as justifiable retaliation against the attack on the US embassy(which, in turn, was a response to earlier US attack on pro-Iranian Iraqi forces). Rodney Martin joins the discussion at 34:00 to condemn Trump's actions as being on behalf of Israel-Firsters, especially when, as Tucker Carlson has pointed out, so little has been done about Mexican Drug cartels and broken borders. (Of course, Carlson is too afraid to Name the Jew.)
Kevin Michael Grace as co-host on the Luke Ford Show is a man of journalistic experience and exhibits many positive attributes of the profession: Curiosity, erudition, and a critical mind. As a staunch conservative, a rare breed in journalism nowadays, he's been resistant to whims of fashion that have come to define Western culture and values. (But then, conservatism, like any -ism, comes with its own set of biases and blind-spots.) People like KMG are outliers not only because they're conservatives in an overwhelmingly Liberal profession but because they have 'liberal' tastes in arts and culture. Now, there is no reason for conservatives to be anti-art or anti-intellect, but in the modern era more liberals than conservatives have been invested in arts, culture, and ideas. One merely needs to survey the media, academia, and institutions. This imbalance has been more pronounced in America where conservatism has either a strong populist or Evangelical strain. As for conservatives committed to the arts, they've generally favored traditional arts, established reputations, or conventional genres. William F. Buckley Jr.'s idea of music was limited to classical. In contrast, KMGs' cultural sensibility and tastes are closer to those of Liberals though his analyses and judgments have a right-wing, Christian, and/or pro-white angle. Unlike the more staid culture warriors of Conservatism, KMG really gets and appreciates modernism, the avant-garde, and pop culture. He even dabbled in punk culture albeit for right-wing reasons. But KMG's inquiring mind and openness go only so far. Sometimes, he falls back on stereotypes and shopworn cliches to spout off on something he knows little or nothing about, as when he caricatured 60s Drug Culture in the manner of silly educational films only good for laughs. Though not a druggy myself — I don't even wanna try pot — , I know enough about hallucinogens from books and friends/associates that they aren't about seeing Magic Dragons. Though KMG is correct about the negative effects of drug culture(that got even worse with cocaine in the 70s, crack in the 80s, and meth in the 90s), he mis-characterizes something he knows nothing about. From Aldous Huxley's DOORS OF PERCEPTION & HEAVEN AND HELL and Jay Stevens' fascinating STORMING HEAVEN, it's clear that psychedelics weren't just escapism into a neural video-game with pink magic bunnies. Besides, doesn't Catholicism believe in miracles, a notion that has been exploited by charlatans to milk tears and dollars from suckers? KMG has interesting things to say when he opens his mind to any subject. Thus, even conservatives have something to gain from the liberal spirit; liberalism becomes a problem when it turns into dogma, as with Political Correctness, whereupon it becomes liberal-in-name-only and stuck within a iron-cast-of-mind. (Likewise, the radical leftist spirit has value insofar as it is willing to question and challenge the existing power structure. It turns sour when the spirit turns into dogma, as with Marxism-Leninism and hardens the passion into a cold iron fist.) Granted, liberals would do better with some degree of conservative anchor or roots as freedom without attachment is like leaves blowing in the wind: Free but fated to brown and wither. At any rate, one of the less appealing aspects of conservatism is to fall back on familiar biases without questioning assumptions. Sticking to the tried-and-true is usually good rule-of-thumb, but it doesn't provide all the answers. That the 60s drug culture went very wrong should be obvious to all, but to characterize psychedelia as KMG does surely misses something crucial. It's unlikely that so many people were drawn to such drugs just to lose one's sense of reality and to see objects turn into monsters. KMG's simpleminded take on Counterculture can be heard 46:00 in the video below.
Rodney Martin is an off/on guest on the Luke Ford Show, and I know little about him except that he's an American patriot, an upstanding member of Middle America. Though a regular American, he speaks more sense that most of the commentariat in Mainstream Media(that are as 'mainstream' as so-called Mainline churches are 'mainline'), and it's heartening that someone who isn't a professional in academia and government is as knowledgeable about world affairs and strives for moral consistency on US foreign policy. In the Grace-Martin discussion, Martin comes off much better because of this very consistency. To better understand the issue, consider the Politics of War in American History. The Liberal-Left opposition to Lyndon B. Johnson and the Vietnam War notwithstanding, most of the political discourse on War has been a matter of, "It's bad if your guy does it, it's good if our guy does it." We saw this with Liberals, leftists, and Progs from Bush II to Obama. While many on the Left opposed and condemned Bush II's invasion of Iraq(not least out of fear that it might turn out well), most were either silent or supportive of Obama's even worse destruction of the Middle East(Syria), North Africa(Libya), and Ukraine, not to mention the 'new cold war' with Russia. In contrast, the 'conservatives', who couldn't get enough of warmongering during Bush II's presidency, were either tepid in their support of Obama's war or even mildly voiced opposition. One of the remarkable things about Trump's 2016 campaign was his pledge to bring the troops home and make peace with Russia. He also denounced the invasion of Iraq as a total disaster. He also reiterated the obvious that the destruction of Libya and Syria only emboldened the terrorists. He did spew bile against Iran, but it was understood he had to throw some red meat to the Zionist oligarchs to get their money. At any rate, something remarkable happened as a result. The Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton became pigeonholed as the pro-war candidate, whereas Trump, for all his bluster and machismo, came across as an anti-war candidate. Thus, his supporters also became anti-war, and this angered the Neocon Jews who see the US as one giant aircraft carrier for Zion.
One of the developments since the end of the Vietnam War was the tendency to root for(or at least not oppose) war IF the commander-in-chief happens to be your guy. To the credit of the American Left, it opposed the Vietnam War when LBJ, a Democrat, was president, and then it opposed the war under Richard Nixon. There was a certain consistency in their position. But a narrative developed since then that the Progressive opposition to a Democratic administration led to the rise of Richard Nixon and Silent Majority. Therefore, the new strategy was one of vociferously opposing wars by Republican presidents while supporting or at least not-opposing wars by Democratic presidents. GOP, in turn, was likely to be far more supportive of GOP-led wars than Democratic-Party-led wars, but overall, its 'support the troops' mentality meant that its anti-war stance was weak at best. And so, Bill Clinton got away with lobbing bombs and missiles all over the place. And there was virtually no opposition to Barack Obama's war on Libya, coup in Ukraine, and aid to terrorists(labeled 'moderate rebels') in Syria. But then, Trump Phenom happened in 2016, and incredibly enough, it seemed as though American Conservatives could be the new anti-war voices and on principled than mere opportunistic basis. This was most welcome since the kind of people who are most likely to get killed in war are conservative white men. Furthermore, the Invade-Invite Strategy undermines American nationalism. By invading and destroying other nations, US loses moral credentials on nationalism, i.e. why should Americans have right of nationalism when their government violates and tramples on the sovereignty of other nations? Furthermore, the US strategy has been to give its invasions a human face with the invite-policy. "We may destroy your nation, but we are so warm-hearted and welcome you displaced folks to our nation." This has been going on since the Vietnam War. Kill millions over there but put on a human face by taking in untold numbers of refugees. This policy is especially damaging to American Conservatism since most of these newcomers end up voting for Democrats. One reason is the Democrats are for more immigration, but the other reason is, despite the fact that Jewish Democrats are the biggest globo-imperialists on Earth, the Democratic Party pays lip-service to concerns of People-of-Color and has at least some factions that speak up for Palestinian rights and oppose war(though never effectively). Thus, Democrats can enjoy their wars and imperialism while feigning 'progressive' credentials of peace and tolerance. In contrast, the GOP comes across as entirely pro-imperialist and pro-war. This was precisely why Donald Trump was so threatening to both Democrats and Republicans in 2016 when he ran, more or less, as a Peace Candidate. Though he projected power & pride(unlike spineless George McGovern in 1972) and supported the US military, he said all the wars in Middle East and North Africa have been disastrous, leading to more terrorism, more instability, more dead soldiers, more dead civilians, and the demographic invasion of Europe via Libya. He took a hardline position on Iran(unfortunately) and promised to reverse Obama's semi-conciliatory policies, but overall, he totally went off the GOP reservation to the ire of Neocon Never-Trumpers. And the passionate support for Trump among many American Conservatives(who cheered in the South when he said Bush family is responsible for the disaster in Iraq) suggested a sea-change in popular opinion. Could it be that American Conservatives are becoming Anti-War in principle? Could it be that Peace, Conciliation, and Diplomacy will become conservative positions while deranged Democrats will clamor for more wars(and cold wars)? Will American Conservatives break with the contemptible tradition of "War's okay if my guy's president, war's not okay if your guy's president." And for awhile, it seemed that way. Whenever Trump said he's about to pull out troops from Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria, many on the New Right cheered whereas Democrats, wenches like Rachel Maddow, and Never-Trump Neocons crowed. It seemed as though the Progs really were stuck on More Wars whereas the New Right was set on No More Wars.
But as Jews run the US, Trump has been unable to make peace with Russia. Not only did the Jew-run Media blast Trump for any sign of thawing with Russia but the hysteria of Russia Collusion Hoax made sane diplomacy with Russia impossible. After all, if half the nation is convinced that Trump is Putin's Puppet, Trump will be denounced as traitor for any overtures to Russia. And despite his many noises, Trump hasn't been able to pull out troops out of Syria, Iraq, and Afghanistan because the military-industrial complex and Jewish faction in the GOP are too powerful. Still, the fact that Trump managed to avert a new major war was seen as something. But perhaps it's the 'beat the wife and kick the dog' syndrome, the one where the man who is berated by his boss at work goes home to mete out violence against weaker members. Trump, having had his manhood taken away by Jewish Zionists and Globalists, is now a castrated and cucked man. As Jews have subverted and destroyed much of his first term, the logical thing for him would be to denounce Jews and maybe bomb Israel for its endless aggression and provocations against Syria, making it more difficult for the US to bring about any closure in that part of the world. But as we know, US is idolatrous of three groups as holy-schmoly — Jews, Homos, and Negroes — , and that means the Holy Holocaust People cannot be opposed or even criticized no matter what they do. So, even though Jews have been breaking Trump's balls from day one, he has to suck their cock and bend over to take it up the ass. Having been thus emasculated, how does Trump go about demonstrating his manhood? He plays dog to the Jews and mauls Arabs/Muslims or barks at Russia(or China). But no matter how loud a dog barks and how hard it bites, its 'toughness' is in service to its master.
A typical cuck celebrates the Jew-run US's attack on Iran/Iraq. He implies that Obama was a weak appeaser while Trump is a resolute patriot. In truth, Obama destroyed Libya, wrecked Syria, and pulled a coup in Ukraine at the behest of his Jewish masters. Obama also started New Cold War with Russia. Also, the money sent to Iran was Iranian money that the US had stolen and kept as 'frozen assets'. But the Jew-run media and cuck-politicians & pundits created this false meme that Obama showered Iran with free cash. Jew-run USA is an empire of lies.
The way Trump is going, he might trigger the biggest war in the Middle East yet, something that Jews want. (Even the peace deal under Obama was really just a trick. Jews were playing good-cop/bad-cop with Iran, throwing it some meat in the hope of driving a wedge between Iran and Russia. Notice that there has hardly been much opposition from Jews and Democrats for Trump's reneging on the Iran Deal.) Trump's reckless actions go to show just how powerful the Jews are in the US. Jews attack and destroy you, and your response is to cuck to them harder. It's like a dog trying to show greater loyalty to the master that beats it up. It's like a slave yelling, "Massuh, massuh, please, massuh", as the master beats him. Jews have done most to derail and defame Trump, but the cuck-man is sucking up to Jews to the point where it might lead to another war. Provoked ceaselessly, Iran might have to respond one day, and that will serve as pretext for another general Middle East War. Trump acts tough, but he knows he's close to being check-mated by Jews, and so he cucks to one faction of Jews in the hope that they will provide him sufficient moral cover and money to survive another day. And the price demanded by this pro-Trump Jewish faction is "MORE WARS FOR ISRAEL, you mangy dog-cuck." And of course, Fox News and other GOP dogs are barking to the script, regurgitating all the talking points about how Soleimani is responsible for 600 dead Americans — I guess 600 is a neat number like 6 million — and how Iran is the main sponsor of terrorism around the world(while anti-war voices on the Right grow more silent by the day). Once again, ugly opportunism is rearing its head over principled opposition to imperialism and war. Tucker Carlson is one of the few anti-war voices left, but even he sticks with the script that Soleimani was a bad bad guy. (Yeah, he's so very very bad, unlike all those heroic US generals who invade and bomb nations thousands of miles away at the whims of Zion, the globo-homo Sodom and Gomorrah of the Middle East.) Again, we are lurching into "My guy's wars good, your guy's wars bad." How long before all those dummy populists will cheer for War with Iran because their guy Trump is commander-in-chief?
Given KMG's keen intelligence and broad knowledge, one would hope he'd know better, but the fact is sensibility and prejudice often trump logic, consistency, and principles. And it seems KMG is turning into a War-Cuck because the basis of his worldview is Western hegemonism, Crusadism, and power-worship-ism. KMG says he's a nationalist and opposed to imperialism, but that means he's for Zionism but not for Palestinian nation-hood. Nationalism only matters to his kind and peoples he likes and to NO ONE else. He opposes non-white invasion of the West, but he feels it's okay for the US to drop bombs and assassinate people in other nations as an occupying force. And even though Jewish Power has done most to castrate and destroy the white race since the end of WWII, he claims to be Philo-Semitic. In other words, nationalism for KMG is mere opportunism to protect and preserve the West and to honor Jews. It doesn't apply to Palestinians and Arabs/Muslims who apparently exist to be bombed and murdered by West's pro-Zionist war machine.
But then, why does KMG admire the Jews? Because Jews are smart, rich, and accomplished. Because Jews are a great powerful people, he dreams of an alliance with them against the non-white world. In a way, KMG's fatal attraction to Jews is akin to Adolf Hitler's mis-perception of Anglos. Hitler admired the Anglos so much that he hoped for alliance of UK and Germany against much of the world, esp. against Jews and Russia. It was a sentimentality on Hitler's part that proved fatal. As Anglos were allied with Jews against Germany, the natural thing would have been for Hitler to maintain his alliance with Stalin. But he attacked Russia instead. Hitler's Anglo-dreams proved to be utterly useless. Likewise, KMG's Philo-Semitic dreams are useless. While a handful of Jews might think well of KMG, most Jews regard him as no different from neo-Nazi ilk. After all, KMG has called out on Jewish bad behavior and interviewed Kevin MacDonald(who is allied with David Duke and Jared Taylor). To Jews, Kevin MacDonald is evil incarnate, and anyone who gives him a fair hearing must be a 'nazi sympathizer'. It doesn't matter that KMG, despite his criticism of Jews, is ultimately a cuckish Philo-Semite because the ONLY kind of Philo-Semite that is acceptable to Jews is one that never ever dares to utter a single syllable critical of Jews. KMG is a sentimentalist about Jews because he thinks his kind can form a sound, stable, and fair relationship with Jews: One where Jews criticize whites, whites criticize Jews, but where both sides respect one another and carry on more-or-less as equal partners. In fact, such isn't in the cards given Jewish personality, arrogance, and megalomania. Jews want whites to be their dog, horse, and cattle. Whites better obey and serve. KMG is willing to serve, but he wants to speak his mind about bad Jewish behavior wherever such exists, but Jews will not tolerate any such. Thus, KMG has been purged just like Kevin MacDonald and Jared Taylor, another sentimentalist about Jews, the very people most responsible for his deplatforming. KMG is right to denounce the seedier and crazier elements of 'white nationalism', but he's under the illusion that Jews regard him any differently because he denounces Richard Spencer and David Duke. No, in Jewish eyes, he's no different. As Jews got the power, it doesn't matter what KMG wishes or thinks. What matters is what Jews think, and Jewish Power says KMG is a white-nationalist-supremacist-neo-nazi-homophobic-catholic-bigot.
I can understand cultural and intellectual Philo-Semitism. Like them or not, Jews have been a great people who contributed notably to arts, culture, religion, science, ideas, and entertainment. So, naturally Jews are worthy of admiration and respect, especially among those goyim who are engaged in the life of the mind and creativity. The problem is POLITICAL Philo-Semitism, i.e. the notion that because Jews have been great in many cultural and scientific spheres, they are somehow above the law or more-equal-than-others. Such pseudo-moralism is a kind of nihilism, a perversion of meritocratism that says those with superior intelligence or achievement have the right to push others around. Consider the Germans and Japanese. Both are highly accomplished peoples with fascinating cultures. Germans made great contributions to music and science. Japanese absorbed influences from China, India, and the West and produced interesting variations. So, one can understand Germanophilia or Japanophilia. But that doesn't mean Japanese have the right to conquer and push around less accomplished peoples. It doesn't mean Germans should invade and push around, say, Bulgarians and Slovaks who are less accomplished intellectually and culturally. The problem with Kevin Michael Grace is that his Cultural Philo-Semitism has turn into Political Philo-Semitism. So, he supports Zionist Nakba of Palestinians and the Occupation. He apparently feels no sympathy for Arab victims of Jews because they're inferior culturally and intellectually. (Or perhaps, there is at work a kind of Spiritual Philo-Semitism, which is the flip side of Spiritual Antisemitism that has been identified with Christianity that long blamed Jews for the killing of Christ. If Christian Antisemitism especially blames the Jews, Christian Philo-Semitism especially blesses the Jews as the Chosen, not least to atone for the Holocaust carried out by 'Christian Europe', though Nazis were Neo-Pagans. By current standards, KMG would be a Christian Anti-Semite for his dogmatic conviction that there is no salvation for Jews in the hereafter without Conversion, but on a subconscious level, he seems to balance this 'moral deficit' via Christian Philo-Semitism that says, even if Jews-as-Jews cannot enter the Kingdom of Heaven, they are deserving of the Holy Land and the support of the Christian community, despite the fact that Jewish-controlled foreign policy have caused grave harm to Christian Arab communities. Or, as a staunch Catholic who has never abandoned the Crusading mind-set, perhaps KMG feels that Europeanized Jews taking the Palestine from the Muslims is a kind of semi-victory for Christendom despite the fact that Jews have turned the Holy Land into Sodom-and-Gomorrah with massive globo-homo debauchery.) This is rather ironic since Jews see the white goy race as inferior in intellect, ability, and wisdom, therefore deserving to be used like horses, dogs, and cattle by Jewish masters. In other words, Jews look upon white people like KMG looks upon Arabs and Palestinians: An inferior people who deserve to be pushed around and made to obey. Kevin Michael Grace says he loves Jews and only dislikes those secular Jews who are paranoid about whites. But the fact is MOST Jews fall into the secular-and-hostile-to-white category. Most Jews voted for Hillary, and many Neocons became Never-Trumpers. And even those Jews who stick by Trump do so ONLY BECAUSE he cucks to Israel and worsened relations with Russia. Furthermore, if indeed KMG is a Philo-Semite, it is largely because of his admiration for SECULAR Jews who achieved most in the realm of arts, ideas, and science from the late 19th century. I doubt if KMG would be so awed with Jews if most of them were religious dogmatists with middling IQ who never contributed much to Modern Culture. Jewish pride and prestige since 'Emancipation' in the 19th century owe almost entirely to secular Jews, many of whom were radical and/or hostile toward whites and Christians. KMG dismisses as 'sentimental' the people in the West who sympathize with Palestinians, but it is he who is a sentimentalist about Jews. Most Jews are hostile to the white race and the West. They are pushing White Nakba and cheering for the Great Replacement. It's not Muslims or Palestinians who control the commanding heights of the West. It's the Jews. Also, KMG, like so many others like him, despair of some Jews being victimized by Diversity. But why should they care when Jews do NOT care about whites victimized by Diversity? If anything, Jews rejoice when whites are victimized by blacks, browns, and other members of Diversity. Just read the pages of the NY Times. Just watch all those TV shows that defame and vilify whites as the New Kulaks or KKKulaks. KMG is stuck in an unrequited love relationship with Jews who only piss all over guys like him. Same goes for Jared Taylor who was deplatformed by Jewish Power but still sucks up to Jews and cheers Zionism even though the grand Jewish Plan is to turn whites into New Palestinians. KMG may point out that Jews in UK and Canada now vote majority-conservative, but what does this mean? Jews have already turned 'conservatism' in Anglo-sphere nations into cuck-politics that cheers Diversity, waves the globo-homo flag, and worships Jews to high heaven. In other words, the kind of 'conservatism' that managed to win over the majority of Jews in Canada and UK is nationalist ONLY when it comes to Israeli interests and Jewish Pride. In other respects, it's hardly distinguishable from 'liberalism' that, in Canada and UK, may be a tad less enthusiastic about All-Things-Zionist. Besides, the reason why the so-called 'conservatives' are even more servile to Jews is because Jewish Elites are still on the 'liberal' side. As Jews are now revered as a holy people and as Jewish Elites got the real power & all the money — the real source of Jewish power isn't votes but money & media — and lean 'liberal', the 'conservatives' must make an extra effort to woo Jews to their side. We see the same thing in the US. Most of Jewish elite power is with 'liberalism' and the 'Democratic' Party, and that is precisely why 'conservatives' pander to Jews even harder. Why don't 'conservatives' just regard Jews as the enemy? Because Jews have been elevated to Holy Holocaust People, and it simply wouldn't do to alienate this god-men, even if they are busily attacking and defaming you and your kind.
So, does this mean that KMG should embrace Neo-Nazism and the crazier elements of Alt Right because Jews see him the same way? No, of course not. We should all keep our distance from lunatics(though, as the saying goes, even a broken clock is correct twice a day, and we should acknowledge that even someone as compromised as David Duke has made certain worthy contributions to the cause with courageous talk, as in this brilliant video). But we should also dispel the myth that Jewish Power will tolerate honest criticism and respect other groups on equal terms. Jews are in Judeo-Nazi mode and demand submission and obedience. We know this from how Jews work on Congressmen, virtually all of whom are made an offer they can't refuse: Sign a pledge to Israel or else. Jews are also the biggest hypocrites in the world. They berate whites for 'racism' and 'white supremacism' and say US/Canada belong to all the world and Diversity, but then they turn around and say ALL Americans & Canadians of all races and backgrounds must cheer for Jews(and Homos) uber alles. If indeed Jews are for racial equality and against ethno-centrism, why must all Americans favor Jews over Palestinians in the Israel-Palestinian Conflict?
And yet, KMG favors the Jews because, despite his knowledge and intelligence, he is at heart a Crusadist-imperialist, power-worshiper, and misguided in his racialism. After all, would KMG really care about Jews if they weren't so rich, so accomplished in arts & intellect? KMG's elitism favors the great peoples over un-great peoples even at the political level. Such attitude isn't much different from the Nazi notion that Germans deserve to invade and rule over the less accomplished Slavs. Jews > Palestinians, Germans > Slavs. Also, as European Jews are half-white, KMG favors them over them Ay-rabs and Muzzies. To many white pro-Zionists, Jews in Israel are 'our whites' and Palestinians are 'those niggers'. KMG even denigrates Palestinian resistance by associating the term 'intifadah' to what black thugs do in the US. Palestinians used intifadah to oppose ongoing Zionist invasion and occupation of West Bank and Gaza, but for KMG, such resistance is no different from black criminal elements wreaking havoc to rape, loot, and rob. Never mind that the Jews are robbing Palestinians of the remaining territories. KMG projects his own rather pathetic sentimentality about Jews onto those who defend Palestinian right of nation-hood. According to KMG, championing the most basic right of nationhood for Palestinians is 'sentimentalism' while sucking up to Jews who hate, defame, and smear people like him apparently constitutes moral rectitute.
Why one or the other? The current orthodoxy holds that one can be both a total tool of Jews and a New Hitler. Consider how Jews regard Donald Trump. They use all their power to ensure that Trump will be totally pro-Zionist in waging more wars for Israel and crushing the national aspirations of Palestinians. Jews make sure that Trump, as puppet of World Jewry, will worsen relations with Russia and increase tensions with Iran. But at the end of the day, despite all of Trump's cucking to Jews, he is still smeared by the Tribe as the New Hitler. Then, the same Jewish Logic applies to people like Kevin Michael Grace. In Jewish eyes, he is both a useful tool of Zionism and a 'white supremacist' far-rightist, even a 'Catholic-Nazi'. Indeed, anti-Trump Jews and 'pro-Trump' Jews play good-cop/bad-cop as they mindfuc* Trump. Anti-Trump Jews accuse him of being an evil 'white supremacist', and so, Trump needs moral protection from so-called 'pro-Trump' Jews, but this comes at a steep price: More New Cold War with Russia, more Wars for Israel, and shut down of BDS and the First Amendment. Jews cannot be appeased. KMG can cuck to Jews all he wants, but he will still be a 'nazi' or 'white supremacist' to them because he doesn't cuck 100%. That's the kind of people he is so Philo-Sentimental about.
There seems to linger a hope-against-hope among the likes of KMG and Jared Taylor(who are so besotted with Jewish power, achievements, and moral status stemming from the Shoah) that IF, maybe just maybe, whites demonstrate their fealty to Jews and Israel just one more time, the Jews will come over to the White Side. But in fact, just as Hitler's sentimentalism about Anglos was misguided, so was Stalin's misconception of Hitlerism. Just like, despite Hitler's overtures to the Anglos, the Anglosphere turned against the rise of German Imperialism, no amount of Stalin's 'trust' of Hitler was going to turn Nazi Germany into a true ally of the USSR. When the time was ripe, Hitler invaded Russia for keeps. Likewise, Jews are in supremacist mode and want to keep the white race as its dog, horse, and cattle. There cannot be mutual respect between Jews and whites. Jews think, "We win, you lose", or "We command, you serve." Jews know they got the meritocratic advantage while whites got the majority-advantage. Jews know that whites will stop serving Jews IF white elites decide to represent the white majority than cuck to the Jewish minority elite. Therefore, all vestiges of white consciousness, even "It's Okay to be White", must be banished from the public sphere. In the end, people like Jared Taylor and KMG are crit-cucks but cucks just the same. Crit-cucks are willing to notice and criticize Jewish Power but, when push comes to shove, they will side with Jews, serve Jews, and obey the Oi-Vey. They aren't like the cuck-cucks who constitute Congress & white elites who totally submit to Jewish Power like Oriental servants kowtowing before the Emperor of Wanton Mercilessness, but they will always reliably side with Jews against Palestinians and the 'muzzies' even when Jews are in the wrong.
Of course, Luke Ford himself is a crit-cuck, not least because he converted to Orthodox Judaism. Ford often speaks bluntly about Jewish Power and Jewish bad behavior, but as a Jewish Convert he is committed to Israel, Zionism, and Jewish Power. His loyalty to Jews contradicts his contention that all groups are tribal and ethno-centric. If so, why isn't Ford, a man of Anglo origin, not sticking with his own kind and fighting for Anglo-national identity? Why did he go over to the Jewish side? It's because there's something even more powerful than tribalism and nationalism. It's power-ism, the Will to Cower before the Will to Power, as when French women in droves ran into the arms of Nazi Occupiers. As Jews got the Will to Power and the Actual Power, so many white cucks(and cucks-of-color) act the bitch and bow down before Jewish Power, the new emperor of wanton mercilessness. Furthermore, obeying Jews or becoming a Jew(as Ford has chosen to do) comes not only with material benefits(or shield) but moral sanctimony as Holy Holocaust Worship has replaced Christianity, what with Anne Frank as the new madonna. Why did Ford convert to Orthodox Judaism than Reform Judaism? Partly because his conservative-leaning values are more likely to be found among Orthodox Jews. But in a way, it could be a way for Ford to compensate for his lack of Jewish roots by serving a hardcore strain of Judaism. After all, if you're born Jewish, you don't have to make an effort to be Jewish. Even if you never attend Temple or traveled to Israel, you can rest on the laurels of being Jewish by blood. But if you converted to Judaism, you must make a big show of being the Real Thing. Thus, becoming a hardcore Orthodox Jew gives Ford a chance to feel more Jewish than Jews-born-Jewish. Often, imitators without the title of originator make up for their deficit with zeal. Is it any surprise that Northern Europeans who came to Christianity later developed more puritanical strains of it?
Anyway, Rodney Martin comes across with more integrity in the discussion with KMG on the Luke Ford Show. Unlike KMG, he calls out on Trump's actions as a show of obsequiousness to Jewish supremacists, all the more pathetic since Jews are leading the charge against Trump. Also, Martin provides the context within which the attack took place. According to KMG, the US had to do SOMETHING in retaliation against the attack on the US embassy in Iraq. Now, if out of the blue Iranians/Iraqis decided to attack the US embassy for no good reason, then KMG would be correct. An attack on an embassy is a serious violation, and a superpower like the US must take action. However, we cannot ignore the context of why so many Iraqis/Iranians/Arabs/Muslims are irate with the US. The attack on the embassy didn't just happen out of the blue for no reason but because the US, as proxy-power of Zion, has been tearing the Middle East and North Africa apart. So, while purely on principles, KMG is right about violation of embassies, the fact is principles are dead in the Middle East and Jews & US killed them. Just consider. The US concocted lies to invade and occupy another nation, namely Iraq, under Bush II. Meanwhile, the nations most responsible for having created the Al-Qaeda — the US, Pakistan, and Saudis — averted responsibility. It was the Saudis and CIA that had armed the Jihadis in Pakistan and Afghanistan. Iraq had nothing to do with it, but Iraq got the blame. In the Clinton 90s, it was said 100,000s of Iraqi kids were killed as the result of sanctions. But the madness didn't end there. Under Obama, Libya was targeted and destroyed for trying to create a gold-based currency for Africa. KMG and others like him may accuse Obama of 'weakness' for not having defended the US embassy in Benghazi, but Obama was sure 'tough enough' to wreck an entire nation. Indeed, the attack on US embassy was the direct result of US arming and aiding the Jihadis in that nation. Obama and Jews even pulled off a coup in Ukraine by allying with Crypto-Nazi elements. And Obama and Hillary, as servants of Jews, began the process of arming Jihadis in Syria, tearing that nation apart, all the while tolerating Israel's constant attacks on that nation. Under Trump, the US lied about chemical attacks and lobbed missiles into Syria and continues to occupy oil fields.
Now, what is a greater violation of international law, norms, and decency? What the US, Israel, and Saudis have done or the hapless attack on US embassy in Iraq? Given the context, it seems what was done to the US embassy was NOTHING compared to crimes committed by Jews and the US. But even as KMG has opposed US interventionist policy in the Middle East, he has expressed little moral outrage. Rather, his real ire is about the attack on US embassy where NO ONE died. His Christian moralism is entirely racial(and misguided since the current US isn't even Christian but globo-homo as Queertianity is the new faith under Jewish hegemony). At Benghazi, only four Americans died, but that is a bigger outrage than all the Libyan cities and towns destroyed by Zio-NATO intervention. According to KMG's moral logic, the US invasions of other nations and violations of sovereignty are less outrageous than the attack on US embassies as imperial outposts.
Btw, if attacks on embassies always call for counter-strikes, would KMG have cheered China's retaliation by killing US generals following the US attack on the Chinese embassy in former Yugoslavia? US claimed it was an accident but really? Or, will KMG say the Chinese deserved it because they were doing fishy things in that part of the world? If Chinese deserved it for shady behavior via their embassy, couldn't the same be said for the US embassies in Libya(where US armed the very Jihadis who turned against them) and Iraq(where no one died by the way, in contrast to what happened to the Chinese embassy)? KMG invokes Jimmy-Carter-as-wimp as foil to Trump, but Carter had his hands tied because the Iranians were holding 55 American hostages. Also, the US was in an embarrassing situation because it had backed the much loathed Shah of Iran(hated by all sectors of Iranian society, from secular liberals to Islamists), a CIA-puppet. Also, as New Iran was both anti-American and anti-Soviet, the US risked pushing Iran into the arms of the USSR if the US waged war on Iran. This was still the era of Cold War and Post-Vietnam fatigue. An Iran allied with the Soviets would have undermined US ambitions in Afghanistan. Also, once Reagan came into office, he sealed the money-for-hostages deal with Iran. He didn't attack Iran either. And when Marines were attacked in Lebanon, Reagan's immediate reaction was to pull out all troops. Was he a wimp for opting out of more intervention in that part of the world? And speaking of craven cowardice, it was the US that did NOTHING when Israel pulled the Lavon affair, stole nuclear material from the US, and willfully attacked the USS Liberty to kill ALL servicemen. To this day, the US hasn't officially recognized what really happened on that day. This is the cuck-coward nation that the US has become under Jewish domination, but KMG laughably invokes Douglas MacArthur's quote about victory. It's the Jews who've occupied the West and are bringing it to ruin. It's the Jew-run West that's been wrecking the Muslim World and killing 100,000s of people. US under Obama and Trump have also aided Saudi Arabia's near-genocidal war in Yemen. And yet, KMG's idea of victory is cucking even harder to the Jews and attacking Iran, one of the few nations that resist the Jew-run US.
Given the context, the US has no right to speak of principles or rights. It violates all principles and all international norms to get what it wants, which is cucking to Jews. What is worse? An Iranian-backed attack on US embassy or the US plotting to bring down an entire government in Ukraine? Also, the very Jews who did regime-change in Ukraine plotted likewise in the US against Trump, pushing the crazy Russia Hoax lunacy and then finally having Trump impeached over the Ukraine comedy, but what does Trump do at the end of the day? He cucks to Israel and attacks Iran. This is 'victory'? If we lived in a world of peace and mutual respect and IF Bad Ole Iran attacked US embassies in other nations, I would agree that the US must act. But the US is now an evil globo-homo nation whose culture is rap, twerking, porn, and Jewish-made TV shows & movies that defame & dehumanize the white race as 'evil nazis who must be hunted down and killed'. But all said and done, KMG's sentimentality for Jewish Power and Awesomeness gets the better of him. He is critical but ultimately a cuck, or a crit-cuck. A crit-cuck may be preferable to a cuck-cuck like Ben Sasse, but it's still pathetic given what Jews have done to the US and KMG's beloved Canada, where the new 'conservatism' means More Diversity for whites and national-rights only for Jews and Israel.
If we go by the adage of bad nations deserving their comeuppance, then the US and Israel need to be bombed many times over. Most of their elites need to stand trial and be hanged. If Japan got what it deserved for its attack on Pearl Harbor, the US deserves far bigger punishment for its lies and invasions. But of course, the US can do as it likes because it's the sole superpower. It's not about principles but the privilege of power. While it's true that power matters and we can't expect all nations, big and small, to get the same treatment — stronger powers will always have more leeway — , there needs to be limits to the power of any nation, but the Jew-run US is now committed to doing ANYTHING to get what it wants. So, if Jew-run US is about Zionism Uber Alles, the hell with Palestinians in West Bank, the hell with Syrians who suffered so much, the hell with Iranians, the hell with Russians, and the hell with white Americans and Canadians who are fated to be replaced by Diversity at the order of Jews. And if Jews feel like cooking up total nonsense like Russia Collusion Hoax and dividing the nation politically and derailing peace with Russia, so be it. Israel, that has 300 nukes made from stolen US material, gets showered with billions while Iran that has allowed international inspections must be sanctioned to death. KMG ignores this larger context and huffs-and-puffs about the attack on the US embassy. Imagine if a black guy taunts, spits on, beats up, and cripples a white guy, but the biggest moral outrage is that the white guy, in retaliation, called the black guy a 'nigger'. That's about the level of KMG's moral integrity when it comes to the Middle East. What is a greater violation of international norms? The Jew-run West and Trump cooking up lies about Assad's chemical attacks and shooting missiles into that country or some ragtag Iraqis attacking the US embassy because the US occupation/imperialism never ends and acts more arrogant by the day?
But what kind of VICTORY? Given that the West is under Jewish Supremacist Control and that this power is pushing for White Nakba & Great Replacement, shouldn't white people be working toward national liberation via total victory over Jewish Power? As different as whites in the West and Iranians are, they have one thing in common: Both are victims of Race War carried out by Jews. Sorosian Jews are hellbent on turning all white nations into Diversity Hellholes and having white wombs be colonized by black seed. Iran, for all its faults, is defying Jewish supremacist power, whereas whites are cucking to the very power that is doing them the most harm. Whites are cheering on the very people who've devised the grand plan of great replacement. It's the Jews in media, academia, and Hollywood who've spread the most anti-white TV shows and movies. KMG complains about how Chinese and Muslim pressures have affected Hollywood products, but the MAIN censorship in US Entertainment is Judeo-centric, i.e. virtually no critical discussion of Jewish bad behavior, e.g. THE VICE blames oil companies for the Iraq War while being mum on the role of Neocon Jews. If anything, white people should take a page from the Chinese & Muslims and collectively threaten Hollywood with racial boycott unless Jews stop with the anti-white vitriol. So, if KMG is for victory, he should be calling for Total Victory over Jews. But his idea of victory is Trump being led on a leash by Zionists to attack Iran, one of the few nations that have managed to stand up to Zion and survive. Back in MacArthur's day, the US was ruled by Anglo-Americans. American Victory back then was victory for White America. In our day, the US is ruled by Jewish globalist whose ideology is essentially Soros-ism. Victory is impossible for whites as long as they are under the tyranny of Jews. No matter how many bombs Trump drops on Iraqis and Iranians to make himself look tough, the only victory will go to Jews who love to make goyim fight goyim. But KMG is too sentimental about Jews to see the big picture.
Another sicko calls for genocide against the Iranians, but this is A-Okay with Twitter that is supervised by Jewish supremacist ADL and SPLC.
Rodney Martin is the true patriot because he understands the context of what is happening. US is under Jewish Supremacist Occupation, and Trump is now little more than a globo-homo ambassador of Zionist hegemonism. He made noises about pulling out of Syria, Iraq, and Afghanistan, but it was all empty talk. And though having averted a major war in the region, he is now threatening Iraq with sanctions IF it expels US troops and threatening to blow up 52 targets in Iran, even historical and cultural sites, in the service of Zion. The US and Canada are now nations where historical monuments are being torn down, where churches are vandalized & desecrated by globo-homo symbols, where tattoos & piercings are commonplace, where young white girls are conditioned for jungle fever & young white males are trained to be cucks, where 100,000s of 'white trash' have been killed by Jewish-peddled opioids, and where every white town is targeted for Great Replacement — and Jews have a key hand in all these trends — , but Trump as 'tough guy' is threatening to bomb historical sites in Iran, a nation that dares to defy Zionists and Israel. And KMG, though willing to criticize Jews, ultimately cucks to them by declaring himself a Philo-Semite with the delusion that 'secular' anti-white Jews are negligible when, in fact, they constitute the great majority of Jews, especially among Jewish elites who hold all the cards. And KMG isn't the only one to cuck thus. All these white guys who haven't the balls to to resist and oppose Jewish power flex their muscles by beating up on 'muzzies'. It's the White goy Will to Cower before the Jewish Will to Power. Jewish Power is turning people like KMG into the New Palestinians, but their idea of 'victory' is bombing and killing Muslims for the merriment of Zion. At this point, any rhetoric about sanctity of embassies ring hollow because the US violates ENTIRE NATIONS with invasion and destruction. But according to KMG's logic, invading and destroying another nation is a lesser deal than attacking an embassy. KMG claims to be a nationalist opposed to imperialist, but when push comes to shove, he is a Crusadist who cheers on MacArthurite Imperialism and sucks up to the biggest power, which now belongs to Jews. In this, there is precious little difference from KMG and lunatics like Frank Burton. In a way, Luke Ford and KMG, as crit-cucks, illustrate why Anglos lost to Jews. For all their criticism of Jewish Power, they remain Philo-Semitic toward the very people who've done the most harm to the white race since the end of WWII. Ford converted to Judaism, and KMG declares himself a Philo-Semite, as if that will temper the hatred and contempt that most Jews feel for him.
The mindset of KMG offers a glimpse into the fatal sentimentality with which so many whites in the West behold Jewish Power and Prestige. For all his critical acumen and commitment to Catholicism, it's as if KMG's life is incomplete without demonstrating that he too is very much with the Tribe despite its War on Whiteness. You see, the Problem Jews are those secular ones and just never mind that MOST Jews voted for Obama and Hillary and rub their hands with glee over the Sorosian prospect of the West becoming Diversity Central. Jews push invade-invite policy with the Muslim World because the Invite gives a human face to the Invade, i.e. "We may invade Muslim nations but look how we are welcoming and embracing them as 'refugees'." Jews spread anti-Muslim tropes among white Christ-cucks to make them fight Wars for Israel in the Middle East but then spread anti-white and anti-Christian tropes among Muslim immigrants to make them side with Jews against whites. And yet, KMG's gripe about Muslims is that might attack Jews. He cares about Muslims hurting Jews even though Jews don't care about Muslims(or any non-whites) attacking and killing whites. In the end, Crit-Cucks are as useless as Cuck-Cucks.
Frank Burton suggests that those who oppose war and resist the Zionist control over the US are looking to Iran as some savior nation. This is utter bull. Anti-War Right's position is that the US and the West are no longer in any position to be lecturing to the world about freedom and justice. US is a nation where people are fined and jailed for refusing to bake 'gay wedding' cakes. It is a nation where Jews, Homos, and Cuck cultural-vandals can desecrate Christian Churches with globo-homo victory banners, but a man is sentenced to 14 yrs in jail for burning such a vile symbol. It is a nation where white cuck dads raise their daughters to emulate Miley Cyrus and have babies with black men. UK is a nation where people are jailed for tweets, and there is an entire litany of 'hate crimes' — concocted by Jews and homos mostly — that effectively shuts down free speech and freedom of assembly. Anti-War voices don't look to Iran as some utopia. They believe the West has no moral qualification to be pushing others around. What is truly 'pozzed' is how so many whites in the West cuck to Jewish Supremacism. To the extent that Iran, for all its problems, has remained outside the globo-homo orbit and defies the Jew-run West, it is deserving of respect.
More utter BS from Frank Burton. If Mexico declared itself an ally of Iran and sent pro-Iranian forces across the border to harm Zio-American interests, you bet the US would be shutting down the border and bombing Mexico. This isn't about geographical distance but about who has the power. Jews control the US, and Jews see no sense in getting tough with Mexico because, if anything, they regard Mexico and Latin America as allies in the browning of America to reduce white power. It won't be long before it's Bye Bye Texas for the GOP. The US is at war with Iraq/Iran because Jews control the US and control its cuck-politicians. After all, if distance is the key factor in US belligerence, why doesn't it attack Israel for its war crimes, support of ISIS & terrorism, espionage against the US, ongoing occupation & oppression of Palestinians, and etc.? The reason why the US has especially been belligerent against Iran and Venezuela is because both nations are loathed by Jews who call the shots. Trump, like most US politicians, is little more than an attack dog that barks and bites for Zion.
